Could you do 7700x vs 7800x3d vs 9800x3d vs 7900x3d vs 7950x3d on 4k 4090 games include Black Myth Wukong, FF 16 or FF7 Remake, Ghost of Tsushima, Resident Evil 4 Remake and other games of your choice
Just in my opinion, I think X3D doesn't help anything in AAA games in 2K res? Because mostly everyone is talking 1080p and only E-sport titles like varolant or PUBG performance. Because mostly I played only AAA games in 2K or 4K DLSS Quality that means the final resolution is still rendering at 2K from 4K settings am I right? If 2K is still not that different that means 4K has no gap too without a doubt. And I'm looking for 9800x3d and it's very hard to find. So I'm thinking about 9950x for 645 USD in my country. Maybe this is a good choice?
IMHO for everyone NOT chasing ultra high fps for competitive gaming at low resolution, X processors are a better choice. I'd take the 9900x over 9800x3d any day, because it's 90% as fast in games, but literally twice as fast outside of gaming and in everything else, meaning your computer will feel way faster day to day and especially in productivity. Also, one thing x3d fanboys always cunningly keep quiet about and never mention it, is the fact that v-cache doesn't do anything in a lot of games, and the performance of the CPU's is not consistent, they'll perform well one time, not the other time, it's like depending on so many factors including what windows decides to do, you need the Xbox gaming thing on PC enabled, etc.
Im looking to upgrade my PC. Honestquestion: Is there a proper "harmony" that PC parts need to have with each other? Example: A 4K monitor needs a Rysen 7 and a 4080 super. If you pair a 4070 with a VERY good monitor and a VERY good CPU, won't the computer just run the helldivers game at the "lowest common denominator"? Plz write back PS. I think theres a better way to ask. Is there a most optimal configuration to make a great working PC? Tier1: R7 4080 Tier2: R5 4070 Tier3: R3 4060 just an example
Until recently I had a AMD Ryzen 5 5500 (yes, the worst possible CPU you can imagine, lowest of the low sub 100€) and a RTX4070 Super. Ran all games at 4K (PUBG, Apex, BF5, BeamNG, AC, iRacing, BF2042, CS2, etc.) that I play, mostly all maxed out settings, and it was perfectly fine to run all these games at locked 144 fps for my 144 hz 4K monitor. In windows it was horrible, very laggy, so annoying, literally right clicking on desktop to make the dropdown menu pop up took 2-3 seconds to react, overall a very sluggish feeling system in windows due to 5500 ryzen, but in games, zero problem, it wasn't even bottlenecking the CPU too much as it was at above 95% often.
4k gaming is almost all about GPU for 95 percent of modern games, if you're comparing modern cpu's. 1440p / 1080p the cpu becomes more important. Even at 1440p/1080p the highest end gaming cpu's are overpriced, besides niches like 360/480hz esport gaming, or a niche game you play that performs best with X3D. Highly recommend a 1440p or 4k 120hz+ GOOD Ips / OLED and as good as a gpu you can buy with a 7600 / 7800x3d or 9600/9700/9800x3d. Purely for cost saving 5700x3d / 5700x / 5600 or even 12th gen intel on sale are also great you can build extremely cheap and pair it with a higher end GPU. At the moment 4070 Ti Super or below is the only thing I would personally consider. If you really have the money and care about 4k gaming nothing comes close to the 4090 ( but 5090 is coming VERY soon ).
@@Navi_xoo thanks for the reply. Im the type of person who builds a great PC and use ps it for like 5 years. Whats the reason you wouldn’t use a 4080 Super?
9700X needs 105W TDP configuration
Could you do 7700x vs 7800x3d vs 9800x3d vs 7900x3d vs 7950x3d on 4k 4090 games include Black Myth Wukong, FF 16 or FF7 Remake, Ghost of Tsushima, Resident Evil 4 Remake and other games of your choice
Just in my opinion, I think X3D doesn't help anything in AAA games in 2K res? Because mostly everyone is talking 1080p and only E-sport titles like varolant or PUBG performance.
Because mostly I played only AAA games in 2K or 4K DLSS Quality that means the final resolution is still rendering at 2K from 4K settings am I right?
If 2K is still not that different that means 4K has no gap too without a doubt. And I'm looking for 9800x3d and it's very hard to find. So I'm thinking about 9950x for 645 USD in my country. Maybe this is a good choice?
IMHO for everyone NOT chasing ultra high fps for competitive gaming at low resolution, X processors are a better choice. I'd take the 9900x over 9800x3d any day, because it's 90% as fast in games, but literally twice as fast outside of gaming and in everything else, meaning your computer will feel way faster day to day and especially in productivity. Also, one thing x3d fanboys always cunningly keep quiet about and never mention it, is the fact that v-cache doesn't do anything in a lot of games, and the performance of the CPU's is not consistent, they'll perform well one time, not the other time, it's like depending on so many factors including what windows decides to do, you need the Xbox gaming thing on PC enabled, etc.
@@derbigpr500 9900x has 12 cores compared to 8 cores in 9800x3d. So it should be not more than 1.5 faster
Im looking to upgrade my PC.
Honestquestion: Is there a proper "harmony" that PC parts need to have with each other?
Example: A 4K monitor needs a Rysen 7 and a 4080 super.
If you pair a 4070 with a VERY good monitor and a VERY good CPU, won't the computer just run the helldivers game at the "lowest common denominator"?
Plz write back
PS. I think theres a better way to ask. Is there a most optimal configuration to make a great working PC?
Tier1: R7 4080
Tier2: R5 4070
Tier3: R3 4060
just an example
All ways get the fastest CPU possible and invest money on a good motherboard for lag free gaming
Until recently I had a AMD Ryzen 5 5500 (yes, the worst possible CPU you can imagine, lowest of the low sub 100€) and a RTX4070 Super. Ran all games at 4K (PUBG, Apex, BF5, BeamNG, AC, iRacing, BF2042, CS2, etc.) that I play, mostly all maxed out settings, and it was perfectly fine to run all these games at locked 144 fps for my 144 hz 4K monitor. In windows it was horrible, very laggy, so annoying, literally right clicking on desktop to make the dropdown menu pop up took 2-3 seconds to react, overall a very sluggish feeling system in windows due to 5500 ryzen, but in games, zero problem, it wasn't even bottlenecking the CPU too much as it was at above 95% often.
4k gaming is almost all about GPU for 95 percent of modern games, if you're comparing modern cpu's. 1440p / 1080p the cpu becomes more important. Even at 1440p/1080p the highest end gaming cpu's are overpriced, besides niches like 360/480hz esport gaming, or a niche game you play that performs best with X3D. Highly recommend a 1440p or 4k 120hz+ GOOD Ips / OLED and as good as a gpu you can buy with a 7600 / 7800x3d or 9600/9700/9800x3d. Purely for cost saving 5700x3d / 5700x / 5600 or even 12th gen intel on sale are also great you can build extremely cheap and pair it with a higher end GPU. At the moment 4070 Ti Super or below is the only thing I would personally consider.
If you really have the money and care about 4k gaming nothing comes close to the 4090 ( but 5090 is coming VERY soon ).
@@Navi_xoo thanks for the reply. Im the type of person who builds a great PC and use ps it for like 5 years.
Whats the reason you wouldn’t use a 4080 Super?
1080p testing pls