One year later: The Chrysler Pacifica was everything we needed

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 124

  • @SSS-mp8th
    @SSS-mp8th 6 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    As a parent of two I nod my head, vans are the best tool for the job. Can haul 4x8 sheet goods, I've had 12' lumber fit inside with the hatch closed and packed everyone and everything including a pet for long trips.

    • @B-rad1
      @B-rad1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SS S You just summed up the comment I was going to post about my Odyssey. I just finished moving its utility is indispensable. And being in college, some of my friends even consider it cool to have a van. Who'd have though?

  • @kbeck4660
    @kbeck4660 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I have one and as a muscle car guy I am not ashamed to say I absolutely love driving this minivan

    • @biggworm6655
      @biggworm6655 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is it fast?

    • @kbeck4660
      @kbeck4660 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@biggworm6655 she definitely rips yes.

    • @scottstrausberger5378
      @scottstrausberger5378 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kbeck4660 Yes they do! Traction is the only thing that limits it...

    • @piggy310
      @piggy310 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's just weird.

  • @Jeremiah17seven
    @Jeremiah17seven 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Lots of positives being talked about with the Hybrid version of the Pacifica. A major drawback for me is that you lose stow and go in the second row...where the Hybrid's battery goes. No way do I want to lose stow and go in the second row. I love having stow and go space in both second and third row, Something to think about for those considering the Hybrid.

  • @kennethwhitney4737
    @kennethwhitney4737 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My 2020 Chrysler Pacifica just turned 200,000 miles and has been driven in all lower 48 states. No major issues except the dealer charged me $600 to change a fog light. I still have my orginial brakes. Flushed transmission, changed spark plugs and I’m ready for another 100,000 miles. I would not own any other van, I love this van. I’m looking for another one. Oh, good mileage and tires last forever, about 85,000 miles

    • @ethanvillavicencio8136
      @ethanvillavicencio8136 ปีที่แล้ว

      What trim do you have

    • @MisterCee41510
      @MisterCee41510 ปีที่แล้ว

      Godd to know. I have a 2017 that has around 85k miles. I love it but Im worried about long term ownership.

    • @shanet7511
      @shanet7511 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you buy new or used? I'm looking at some 2022 with around 50-60k miles but being military in Germany there's only a few to choose from

  • @jacobreed47
    @jacobreed47 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So lucky we haven't a single issue with our Pacifica. And we have manual 3rd row seating, I knew that was gonna be an issue,just look at the Ford Flex same thing same problems. Manual 3rd is the way to go. Love our Pacifica.

    • @user-qu6rd1uv7z
      @user-qu6rd1uv7z 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Acuravigor47 Ford Flex needs a hybrid or PHEV version

  • @sensiblebabyandreality6804
    @sensiblebabyandreality6804 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Until people realize one thing, if you maintain a vehicle very well regardless of make, they will last a long time. If you don't, it is your own fault for not maintaining the vehicle meticulously.
    As an experienced Service Advisor who worked for Chrysler many years, I can speak from experience how well maintained Chryslers lasted an awfully long time with very high mileages and just wear and tear repairs such tires or brakes.
    Personally, I have owned many Chryslers and none of them gave me any major problems until later on in their life.
    Bottom line is to maintain ur vehicle well.
    Yes there are certain vehicles that are an exception to the rule where no matter how you maintain it, it still gives you repeated issues. However, in this day and age that is only 5 to 10% of the vehicles these days.

    • @joelrepass2379
      @joelrepass2379 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Shahji Mangalam Very true but each car manufacturer does have their cars that aren’t reliable, even Toyota. I think Chrysler gets a terrible rep for poor reliable when GM and Ford aren’t much better.

    • @doug9066
      @doug9066 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes this is so true, I keep my 2006 Lincoln Town Car maintained, mostly oil changes with the exception I had to replace the rear suspension air bags & pump last summer other than that no issues. I'll eventually get the transmission serviced as I add more miles to my car & then a tune up eventually. Yes that's the key word keep up with maintenance as needed especially oil changes.

    • @scottstrausberger5378
      @scottstrausberger5378 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you Sensible..... Years ago I belonged to a forum where people would complain about Chrysler reliability endlessly. Once you questioned them, guess who did not own a Chrysler.

  • @Robert-fy1vq
    @Robert-fy1vq 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    People keep leaving comments about how bad Chrysler reliability is. I own a 2015 Dodge Grand Caravan and in 3 years not one problem. My sister bought a 2015 Honda CRV a couple month later and it has been in 5 times to the service department. My aunt has a 2005 Honda Odyssey and from day one is has had problems. I owned Toyotas for 26 years and yes I had problems. My last car was a 1998 Toyota Avalon and I had that car for 18 years. From the very first day it had electrical issues, but it came and went. Most of the time everything worked fine. I take very good care of my cars and so far I love my Dodge minivan. Before I bought one I asked people driving one if they liked the Dodge or had problems, most said they liked their Dodge and had very few issues. Do buy what you like. You never know if you will get a lemon or not.

  • @briandjordjevic9969
    @briandjordjevic9969 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Mopar or no car I got the 2017 Pacifica it’s great

  • @Jeffrey-s6g
    @Jeffrey-s6g 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You know what I absolutely love my 2017 Chrysler 200 LX, but after that car is paid for I am definitely eyeing the Pacifica. For me though certified preowned fully loaded model is what I'll be after. Chrysler has been doing good in producing fancy looking cars, they don't sell alot but thats okay i like the exclusivity feeling

  • @MustPassTruck
    @MustPassTruck 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What about all the reviews talking about transmission problems?

    • @kenhoward3512
      @kenhoward3512 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's troubling. Chrysler transmission problems goes back decades.

    • @grantdillon6325
      @grantdillon6325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kenhoward3512 The ZF 9 speed had a lot of issues upon launch. After a while they got the programming right. My 2017 Pacifica work van shifts just fine.

  • @dgc2780
    @dgc2780 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kudos to chrysler!! i was freaking sad when they declare bankrupt at 2006? (not sure the year), but now no matter if they model availability is short, their cars are quite good (not the best world class)

  • @PaulHo
    @PaulHo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That dog stole my heart. What van?

  • @kmwu8702
    @kmwu8702 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I do think Chrysler have better design than the competition, but the poor build quality and the reliability is what killing it...

    • @gedaman
      @gedaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      King M Wu Always lease an FCA product. They’re not made to last in the long term. Everything made by FCA from Fiat to Alfa Romeo has some of the lowest reliability ratings in the industry. Drive it for 36 months then get something else.

    • @joelrepass2379
      @joelrepass2379 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The problem isn’t the engineering behind the vehicle on Chrysler’s. It is the manufacturing. What makes Toyota’s built so well is that if the people at the factory do a good job the can move up to Lexus. The people at Chrysler slap their cars together and try to push them to the dealers. I noticed that with my Ram but once the dealer fixed the problems from the factory the truck has been very reliable.

  • @TalismanPHX
    @TalismanPHX 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scary front passenger side suspension clunking is either A: halfshaft (known problem) or B: mismanufactured lower control arm thats now loose.... possibly BOTH.

  • @TheBioAbyssal
    @TheBioAbyssal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I had the same clunking/ clicking noise. It has transpired to numerous repairs, lies, and jumping through hoops. At this point and with legitimate reason, the vehicle is being purchased back under lemon law. It’s a shame, otherwise outstanding vehicle, poor half-shafts. I will miss it, to a degree. On a side note, there have been over 1200 reported cases thus far and seem to be mainly affecting very top trim level from the 2017 batch.

  • @NileshR12
    @NileshR12 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd get this Pacifica Limited in this blue with those wheels. Or even the upcoming Pinnacle trim with that color & wheels

  • @iketheranter9126
    @iketheranter9126 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for this test!!! 😁

  • @capitan_camote_picante6370
    @capitan_camote_picante6370 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    N. America needs the Traveller and Trafic

  • @calbob750
    @calbob750 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    FCA sells more Dodge Grand Caravans than Pacificas. The Pacifica is a refined minivan, the Dodge is more budget friendly. I hesitate to say a discount off sticker close to 5K new can be found on the Grand Caravan.

  • @JaisenJames
    @JaisenJames 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you test the hybrid?

  • @pbldrum
    @pbldrum 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did I hear thirty thousand miles at the beginning of this video? How's the tranny? Chrysler minivan transmissions are notoriously horrible and undependable. Was it still shifting smoothly? I owned an '05 T&C and it had a shuddering clunk when it came to a stop.
    I do love the look of this new Pacifica. Vans are still cool...

    • @vivekdarji9053
      @vivekdarji9053 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Stamp Jockey Chrysler fixed the 9 speed and now it works well in all vehicles with it equipped with it

  • @PartyUpLive
    @PartyUpLive 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the interior of this van and it's nice, but I went with the Grand Caravan because of the issues cars have the first few years of a new generation. This one for example, has problems that I am happy I avoided for the sake of getting the "latest and greatest".

  • @safetyequipco
    @safetyequipco 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2 years? Long term?

  • @BTC909
    @BTC909 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you make enough to cover the full $7,500 Federal Tax Credit it makes no sense not to get the Plug In Hybrid. It's cheaper than the Touring L & Touring L Plus & Limited. I would avoid the '17, lots of them being dumped and can be found for 20K with low miles. '18 has AA & ACP.

    • @bulletchevyz71
      @bulletchevyz71 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ivan Vojt what's aa and acp?

    • @BTC909
      @BTC909 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Android Auto & Apple CarPlay.

    • @user-qu6rd1uv7z
      @user-qu6rd1uv7z 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Between federal and state we got over 10K in rebates / credits on our plug-in van

  • @davect01
    @davect01 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Despite what great features they may have when your Pacifica becomes a huge driveway paperweight from constant breakdowns you will be regretting it.
    It is a shame because Chrysler/Dodge turns out some great ideas

  • @user-qu6rd1uv7z
    @user-qu6rd1uv7z 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Our plug-in version is great. It typically yields 1000 miles per tank of gas mostly (city driving)

  • @dough4508
    @dough4508 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a 2017 Pacifica right as I comment it will be a year in July nothing but issues don’t kno if because I got it at 40 thousand miles but had a transmission issue around 50k mark then the back door stopped working warranty didn’t cover 800$ stow seat don’t stow had 2 bad leaks crank seal and Valve cover seal Alternator serpentine belt I’m at 75,000 miles right now only because I drive for Lyft and Uber but a Car shouldn’t have those problems at that mileage not even At 100,000 miles shit factory warranty was over at 60,000 miles I got it at 40 extended warranty doesn’t cover everything I think it was a bad deal for me $30,000 car Oh and I forgot to add the transmission is slipping again

  • @marktuyet
    @marktuyet 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had front end problems with all my Dodge Caravans .
    But now I have lots of issues with my Toyota Sienna including a repaint .

    • @kevinposhepny8907
      @kevinposhepny8907 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Marktuyet What year is your Sienna? And what do you mean "a repaint"? Just curious about the issues, I have a 2017 Sienna with about 9500 miles and it's been trouble free for 10 months. My second Toyota, and I love it!

    • @SuzukiKid400
      @SuzukiKid400 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Marktuyet A friend of mine had his Sienna engine cease up just after the warranty expired. He had taken it in for several service appointments telling them the engine was making clunking noises but they said it was normal. When the engine ceased they wouldn’t cover any of the cost to fix the van. He was so pissed if he had to pay for a new engine. He immediately traded it in for a Pacifica. Not all brands are perfect!

    • @marktuyet
      @marktuyet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have too many issues with my 2011 Sienna. Hard to believe it's a Toyota . Complete repaint ..the entire vehicle .. steering column problems . All exterior rubber disintegrating . Plastic interior parts breaking . Second row seats stuck and can't remove ..the list goes on and on . It's just my wife and I and we are in our 60s and not pets .
      Maybe it was made in China .. lol! Pos

    • @piggy310
      @piggy310 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@marktuyetUmmm okay..

  • @Dronetothetop
    @Dronetothetop 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The major problem starts at around 40,000 miles range according to the other real owners.

  • @sadmanh0
    @sadmanh0 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    how is it difficult to get that kid into a pickup truck? he can walk and everything by himself

    • @trkonkal
      @trkonkal 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Especially kids, passengers will be brushing up against the step rail and the rest of the dirty truck trying to get in and out.

    • @suyogm691
      @suyogm691 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol well he had to say something to convince us or rather justify his buy 😜 Anyways but it’s nice van

  • @tomwork8500
    @tomwork8500 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    !!$800 for a windshield!! That alone kinda sways me back k to considering a Odyssey.

    • @vivekdarji9053
      @vivekdarji9053 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tom Work it wasn’t the cars fault

    • @scottstrausberger5378
      @scottstrausberger5378 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've replaced 2 of them and together they didn't cost that much.

  • @t.s.4091
    @t.s.4091 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Only import cars in Europe... We actually do not have any vans with as many features as the Pacifica.

  • @mikeybthepilot
    @mikeybthepilot 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    E-Hybrid one is better. We had both, the plug-in one is vastly superior.

    • @dontelindsey5846
      @dontelindsey5846 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mikey B what made it better?

    • @mikeybthepilot
      @mikeybthepilot 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Donte Lindsey It drives better thanks to the lower centre of gravity. It accelerates much more smoothly. It is far quieter. It’s just all-around more pleasant and more refined.

    • @dontelindsey5846
      @dontelindsey5846 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mikey B thanks

    • @kevinf2661
      @kevinf2661 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      With heavier total weight I'm super curious about suspension failure. Especially after this video.

    • @mikeybthepilot
      @mikeybthepilot 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kevin F they gave the Hybrid version “heavy duty” suspension vs the gas version, for what that’s worth. The battery pack is only a few hundred pounds and the overall van is lighter than the outgoing T&C despite being bigger through the use if aluminium etc so I don’t see it as being a problem. I have to think any automotive engineer worth their salt would know how to deal with a few extra hundred pounds on a vehicle.

  • @fentor3713
    @fentor3713 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The plug-in version is better

    • @davidhood9712
      @davidhood9712 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree. We just bought one and love it!

    • @gedaman
      @gedaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Plug-in Hybrid version doesn’t have stow ‘n go seats though.

    • @kevinf2661
      @kevinf2661 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Any reports on the hybrid's 1 year suspension reliability? Curious about the higher total weight.

    • @SweetBearCub
      @SweetBearCub 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Plug-in Hybrid version doesn’t have stow ‘n go seats though." The plug-in only gives up second/middle row stow & go, as the battery is there. In exchange, it actually gets beefier and more comfortable second row seats. As such, the 8th seat (middle second row) isn't an option. It does retain the 3rd row stow & go. For me, giving up a gimmicky 2nd row stow & go and uncomfortable 2nd row seats in exchange for a 33 mile all-electric capability, plus normal hybrid capabilities after that (average MPG rises from 22 combined to a whopping 32, insane for a minivan), it's so worth it.

    • @user-jz3vc9kd2j
      @user-jz3vc9kd2j 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL if it's not 290 horsepower plugin isn't better. Fact

  • @thesimplegig
    @thesimplegig 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Miles?

  • @roguedogx
    @roguedogx 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Before watching - please no reliability or quality issues. Please no reliability or quality issues.

    • @roguedogx
      @roguedogx 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dam it! Although it's no where near as bad as the Cherokee in mt's long term test.

    • @a.kblur04
      @a.kblur04 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      roguedogx Chrysler is great, they just... don’t know, I’ve got no excuses. They’re like an American Alfa Romeo to me, reliability meh, but I have an unconditional love for them and everything they bring to the table

    • @gedaman
      @gedaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Adam Douglas LMAO - Chrysler is owned by FCA which also makes Alfa Romeo. They’ve gotten a lot better since the Italians took them over in 2010. Just look at how nice all of the interiors are on everything from the Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 to the Chrysler Pacifica and Alfa Romeo Guilia. Sergio Marchionne has really turned Chrysler around into a respectable and most importantly profitable company again.

    • @a.kblur04
      @a.kblur04 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know I know, haha! Chrysler and Alfa are technically related. But I'm speaking kind of how Alfa is to the Europeans. Something about them, and they are loved even if unreliable. That's what Chrysler is to America in my opinion. And yes totally, their cars since FCA aren't unreliable and are actually awesome vehicles. However the stereotypes of Chrysler equals garbage still remain.

  • @fortunatedad7695
    @fortunatedad7695 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Garbage is still garbage even if its wrapped in a nicer leather and is more aesthetically pleasing.

  • @GUYANESEGT
    @GUYANESEGT 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Toyota sienna is the minivan for me

    • @instasingingvids3529
      @instasingingvids3529 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      samus aran me too

    • @jacobreed47
      @jacobreed47 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meh, low tech and boring to drive. Look at the Toyota Alphard or Veilfire minivans, those blow the Sienna away.

    • @GUYANESEGT
      @GUYANESEGT 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      i don't think we have those here

    • @gedaman
      @gedaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Toyota Sienna is crap compared to the new Chrysler Pacifica. The Sienna feels like a tin can rattling down the highway with cheap plastics and outdated infotainment system. Toyota is overrated AF.

    • @Aaron-tk7wh
      @Aaron-tk7wh 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      gedaman yeah right unlike Pacifica the sienna wouldn't be in the garage getting fixed when was new so sorry your comment is false.

  • @cotes42
    @cotes42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Had to like it to break the 666 likes number 👼🏻

  • @Gwolf888
    @Gwolf888 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    rebrand as a Dodge Pacifica in next generation. rest in peace Chrysler

  • @Crankshaft232
    @Crankshaft232 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did i see a Porsche lose to a drag race to a stupid van

  • @East17A
    @East17A 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so after one year you have two issues . the sized up seats and squeaking suspension !!! and that is Chrysler in case you forget wait for it 4 more years and praise your self . with the on going non stop mechanic visit . other way protect your self with extended Warranty . that probably not going to cover everything that needs repairs . just do your self a favor folks. Don't buy it used. and if you can't help it. get extended warranty

    • @gedaman
      @gedaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      East17A I wouldn’t want to own any FCA vehicle for longer than a 36 month lease. FCA makes some nice cars like the Pacifica, Grand Cherokee, Charger SRT Hellcat, and Alfa Romeo Guilia, but I wouldn’t want to deal with their terrible long term reliability issues.

    • @East17A
      @East17A 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      gedaman specially when they get paid a lot money. Some people concider 25 or 30 thousands dollars not a lot of money for a car but in fact it is a lot of money to consider reliability

    • @keyoke69
      @keyoke69 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leasing is dumb af. A fool and his money.

  • @rickt2419
    @rickt2419 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Within the first year already that many issues and you still recommend it !? Be serious!
    Chrysler is still just Chrysler, so sad! I won't even take one as a rental.

    • @Jeremiah17seven
      @Jeremiah17seven 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I rented one and used it for a week long trip to Florida from Texas. All of us loved it for many reasons. Ended up buying a 2019 Pacifica and so far we all love it. Yes...it could have problems and might not. But the same can be said for any brand. I owned a Toyota 4X4 and hated it. Had engine problems very early on after owning it. I have not owned a Toyota since...and never want to. All brands have their problems.

    • @SuzukiKid400
      @SuzukiKid400 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rick T Yeah, Chrysler should know better than to allow their windshields to get hit by ricks and to allow nails to get into their tires. Pffftt

  • @Video-Games-Are-Fun
    @Video-Games-Are-Fun 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you can live out of here and save money on a housing payment every month!

  • @brucewayne-ej3cx
    @brucewayne-ej3cx 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    $800 windshield lol. Yeah Fuck dodge/chystler buy one if you like paying for lots of repairs.

  • @MrAsh-cw5cq
    @MrAsh-cw5cq 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I still prefer the odyssey or sienna

    • @gedaman
      @gedaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mr. Ash Some people prefer inferior products. I like a modern minivan that doesn’t shake at highway speeds. I would never choose a shaky Sienna or overpriced Odyssey over the Chrysler Pacifica.

    • @SweetBearCub
      @SweetBearCub 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "I still prefer the odyssey or sienna" And I prefer a minivan that gives me 33 miles of all electric range and then a whopping *32 combined MPG*, which is 10 more than the gas-only version. Even higher in the city, where frequent stops and starts can lean more heavily on the electric portion. Chrysler's had it for the 2017, 2018, and the upcoming 2019 model years. Where's Honda and Toyota's response? Nowhere. Crickets.

    • @user-jz3vc9kd2j
      @user-jz3vc9kd2j 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL you prefer to pay 10k more for something that looks like a turd with 100 less horsepower? Cool bro.

  • @premiercconstruction
    @premiercconstruction 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry Chrysler is the 30k mile wonder. After 30k everything notoriously falls apart and the value evaporates.
    Chrysler has a lot to prove after making
    complete crap for so many years. They can make great vehicle but they choose not to. That says a lot....

  • @Slickpete83
    @Slickpete83 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    just wait until the shitty built quality of Chrysler kicks in and stuff starts to break down early

    • @instasingingvids3529
      @instasingingvids3529 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Slickpete83 yep

    • @jacobreed47
      @jacobreed47 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Look at the town and country and Grand Caravan. Those are built like tanks and 1st editions are still on the road today. FCA yes but minivans everyone knows they do it right.

    • @christopherbrown1391
      @christopherbrown1391 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They all have there problems. I think the Honda and Chrysler are the best

    • @brockwalls1413
      @brockwalls1413 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Acuravigor47 Bingo. It’s one of the reasons (besides cost) that they haven’t really changed the Grand Caravan in like 7 years. There’s nothing wrong with it.

    • @gedaman
      @gedaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brock Walls The Grand Caravan has been around for 11 years now and needs to die. The Chrysler Pacifica is so much better!!!

  • @jackpez
    @jackpez 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Never lease a car

  • @mirjaaaaan
    @mirjaaaaan 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    First

  • @cherylgaston479
    @cherylgaston479 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dont buy chrysler cars no matter how nice they are full of problems they are a money pit

  • @dannynguyen4081
    @dannynguyen4081 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I was going to buy this van but the guy with the son kept cussing so I decided to skip this car. Good job...