Thanks! There’s so much I didn’t cover in the video, the custom button settings to get extra zoom on shots as well as the shooting modes just makes this camera so easy and fun to use
You have described it very well. The Gh5 is a timeless camera. I am a documentary and film maker and I work for several television stations in my country and I continue to use this camera for my work along with others like the Gh6 or the Blackmagic 4k...it is important to invest in good optics. With premium optics the image is even better. Greetings from Spain.
Hola, and muchos gracias! Definitely agreed! Some lens like the Sigma 18-35mm really gets the best out of the GH5, one of my favourite combos ever and I’ve used a LOT of cameras!
GH5 is still a beast in 2024 and you can find them pre-owned at ridiculous prices! I picked one up a few months ago; like new, with a 47 shutter count for $440 USD.
@@TalesOfTam I actually switched over to the GH5 from the Sony A6700, which is saying a lot IMO. The biggest thing for me was that the GH5 never overheats when shooting 4K60 continuously, whereas the A6700 literally would overheat and shut off after only recording 4K60 for 25 mins which I think is totally unacceptable for a brand new, $1500 camera.
@@DennisMeetsWorld wow that’s really interesting, the a6700 looked really good to me but I suppose if autofocus isn’t needed then the GH5 is incredible
You don't multiply the aperture by 2, only the focal length and depth of field. An f/1.2 lens on MFT will still take in the same amount of light as it would on a FF camera. So yes, if you are talking about the depth of field only, then you can multiply the aperture by 2.
I returned the G9 II and reverted to the GH5. The color accuracy on the new model was disappointing; the focus and higher frame rate did not justify the cost when the skin tones were so inaccurate, making everyone appear like characters from The Simpsons. Consequently, I nearly sold all my Micro Four Thirds gear but decided to keep my GH5 and Leica 12-60 lens. With the remaining funds, I purchased a Fujifilm GFX 50s II medium format camera.
The GH5 is a good survivor anyhow! I will say have you looked into the S5ii? Jumping from the tiny 4/3 sensor to bigger than full frame must be a difference!
@@TalesOfTam Yes, I was considering the S5ii, but it would cost approximately 40% more than the GH5 and Fuji combination. S5ii is indeed sharper and 1 stop more dynamic, beside for low noise. But GH5 still had deeper colors, and less rolling shutter.
@@TalesOfTam Indeed, 400mbit ALL-I surpasses many cameras at the 3000 euro price point in today's standards. Pana Leica is affordable in Denmark and offers greater clarity compared to Olympus lenses.
@@skumcat most definitely, value for money it can’t be beaten, just a shame about the autofocus but as I have shown on my channel it’s not completely needed!
It would be interesting to know what this camera makes it "old" compared to newer cameras because personally I don't see a difference in terms of quality in video recording. And the GH4 which I also own brings very similar results in 4k, you couldn't tell the difference. Of course stabilisation is gonna be non existing on the GH4 but if you have a stabilizer then... Nothing is stopping you. There s always this general idea that working with older cameras doesn't make you "professional" but this is really nonsensical.
The annoying thing about the gh5 is that it reads out the sensor in 10bit linear, hence why it has the V-LOG-L The S-series have 12bit linear readout whicg is the reason for their higher DR, not necessarily because they are fullframe
@@handfuloflight If you want to have full control of the image processing and the best potential image quality, then the Sigma FP. This comes with the cons of slow turn around time and massive file sizes. The S5II is a better quick turnaround and general use camera.
@@handfuloflight The issue with you question is the fact that both sensors are very similar but the main difference is the s5ii processes everything in camera. You can get 10/10 images from it, but that requires you to nail your exposure, your white balance and everything to do with the image. You have very minimal post-processing flexibility. So you have to understand how you camera processes the image from 12bit linear raw signal to a 10bit log video. You basically control the input so you can expect a good output. The sigma fp gives you much more flexibility, but this also means, that if you're not good at post-processing, your image has a high chance of coming out looking poor. You have control over the input and output unlike the s5ii. It's all about what your skill level is and how much convenience you need out of a camera. I'd reserve the fp for narrative or creative jobs and use the s5ii for everything else
The autofocus issue has nothing whatsoever to do with the age of the GH5. My initial step into micro 4/3 was with the GH2, of which I have to say has a certain image quality which is great. I follwed that with a GH3 and then two GH4's, never had an issue with autofocus in video mode with any of those old cameras. Now I have the GH5 and have autofocus issues like everyone else.
Hey, so basically V-Log is a colour profile that extracts the most colour information so when you go to edit and colour grade the footage you can have maximum freedom, it also catches the highlight better. Great when paired with 10 bit footage so you can grade to your desired image! If you’re just starting however then Cine D is good enough :)
@@gonzapaschetta for the GH5 you would need to buy it if you’re buying brand new, but to be honest they don’t sell brand new so chances are on the used market you can find a GH5 with V-Log already bought :)
The GH5 is a staple in the videography community, excellent video and great breakdown.
It really is, the OG for me 😂
😮amazing video, I actually buy gh5 in 2024,, still learning those all farme rates and focus peaking
Thanks! There’s so much I didn’t cover in the video, the custom button settings to get extra zoom on shots as well as the shooting modes just makes this camera so easy and fun to use
Really good video man, loved the cinematic bit at the start
Thanks!
You have described it very well. The Gh5 is a timeless camera. I am a documentary and film maker and I work for several television stations in my country and I continue to use this camera for my work along with others like the Gh6 or the Blackmagic 4k...it is important to invest in good optics. With premium optics the image is even better. Greetings from Spain.
Hola, and muchos gracias! Definitely agreed! Some lens like the Sigma 18-35mm really gets the best out of the GH5, one of my favourite combos ever and I’ve used a LOT of cameras!
Feels like a decent camera to step from budget range nowadays. Sub £700 with kit for pretty pictures without having to think too much is a decent deal
Definitely! If you can get past the autofocus it’s still insane value
I got GH5, amazing, love to hear your video
Congratulations! It’s a phenomenal camera and I’m sure you’ll enjoy!
My guy a whole reviewer now kk, professional stuff there
Safe my bro 😂
Music video is going hard broo 💪💪💪
Very cold I must admit 👀
I am the recipient of this beautiful tech 😁
IF ANYONE WANTS TO SEE AND HEAR PURE ART CHECK OUT THIS CHANNEL
Banging video man. Very thorough analysis of the LUMIX GH5
Appreciate it!
Nice video man
Appreciate it!
We still use this today. It's awesome.
It is timeless!
Very informative! I love this content!
Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks
GH5 is still a beast in 2024 and you can find them pre-owned at ridiculous prices! I picked one up a few months ago; like new, with a 47 shutter count for $440 USD.
Just wanted to let you know, you are a proud owner of an incredible piece of gear!
@@TalesOfTam I actually switched over to the GH5 from the Sony A6700, which is saying a lot IMO. The biggest thing for me was that the GH5 never overheats when shooting 4K60 continuously, whereas the A6700 literally would overheat and shut off after only recording 4K60 for 25 mins which I think is totally unacceptable for a brand new, $1500 camera.
@@DennisMeetsWorld wow that’s really interesting, the a6700 looked really good to me but I suppose if autofocus isn’t needed then the GH5 is incredible
The camera seems very reliable in all conditions
Yeah it really is!
Just bought one for $350 last month and I love it
Incredible bargain for such a great camera! Well done
Definitely still an underrated camera on a budget especially using a lens adapter to have a wider variety of lens
And with a speedbooster better DOF and low light capabilities!
You don't multiply the aperture by 2, only the focal length and depth of field. An f/1.2 lens on MFT will still take in the same amount of light as it would on a FF camera. So yes, if you are talking about the depth of field only, then you can multiply the aperture by 2.
I see, thanks for clarifying!
Gh5, metabones speed booster, and Vlog you can't go wrong
Yep what I used! Very reliable and cost effective
they need to sponsor my guy
fr fr
The GH5 also has a 4K Open Gate mode at 60fps, you can't found this even on the G9II or S5IIX.
It’s unreal value for a camera 7 years old at this point!
I returned the G9 II and reverted to the GH5. The color accuracy on the new model was disappointing; the focus and higher frame rate did not justify the cost when the skin tones were so inaccurate, making everyone appear like characters from The Simpsons. Consequently, I nearly sold all my Micro Four Thirds gear but decided to keep my GH5 and Leica 12-60 lens. With the remaining funds, I purchased a Fujifilm GFX 50s II medium format camera.
The GH5 is a good survivor anyhow! I will say have you looked into the S5ii? Jumping from the tiny 4/3 sensor to bigger than full frame must be a difference!
@@TalesOfTam Yes, I was considering the S5ii, but it would cost approximately 40% more than the GH5 and Fuji combination.
S5ii is indeed sharper and 1 stop more dynamic, beside for low noise. But GH5 still had deeper colors, and less rolling shutter.
@@skumcat well you can never go wrong with the GH5, great lens options for cheap too and very tough
@@TalesOfTam Indeed, 400mbit ALL-I surpasses many cameras at the 3000 euro price point in today's standards. Pana Leica is affordable in Denmark and offers greater clarity compared to Olympus lenses.
@@skumcat most definitely, value for money it can’t be beaten, just a shame about the autofocus but as I have shown on my channel it’s not completely needed!
It would be interesting to know what this camera makes it "old" compared to newer cameras because personally I don't see a difference in terms of quality in video recording. And the GH4 which I also own brings very similar results in 4k, you couldn't tell the difference. Of course stabilisation is gonna be non existing on the GH4 but if you have a stabilizer then... Nothing is stopping you.
There s always this general idea that working with older cameras doesn't make you "professional" but this is really nonsensical.
Most definitely! It’s such a capable camera now and will continue to be so
Short answer: Yes
You know it!
The annoying thing about the gh5 is that it reads out the sensor in 10bit linear, hence why it has the V-LOG-L
The S-series have 12bit linear readout whicg is the reason for their higher DR, not necessarily because they are fullframe
@@shueibdahir that’s really interesting I didn’t know that, I now also have the S5ii so that’s a cool thing to have!
S5II or Sigma FP, bro?
@@handfuloflight If you want to have full control of the image processing and the best potential image quality, then the Sigma FP. This comes with the cons of slow turn around time and massive file sizes.
The S5II is a better quick turnaround and general use camera.
@@shueibdahir If you can get a 10 out of a Sigma FP relatively speaking what can you get out of a S5II?
@@handfuloflight The issue with you question is the fact that both sensors are very similar but the main difference is the s5ii processes everything in camera. You can get 10/10 images from it, but that requires you to nail your exposure, your white balance and everything to do with the image. You have very minimal post-processing flexibility. So you have to understand how you camera processes the image from 12bit linear raw signal to a 10bit log video. You basically control the input so you can expect a good output.
The sigma fp gives you much more flexibility, but this also means, that if you're not good at post-processing, your image has a high chance of coming out looking poor. You have control over the input and output unlike the s5ii.
It's all about what your skill level is and how much convenience you need out of a camera.
I'd reserve the fp for narrative or creative jobs and use the s5ii for everything else
The autofocus issue has nothing whatsoever to do with the age of the GH5. My initial step into micro 4/3 was with the GH2, of which I have to say has a certain image quality which is great. I follwed that with a GH3 and then two GH4's, never had an issue with autofocus in video mode with any of those old cameras. Now I have the GH5 and have autofocus issues like everyone else.
That’s really interesting, I’ve never tried any of the GH5’s predecessors so would be interesting to verify!
What do you mean buy a vlog?
Hey, so basically V-Log is a colour profile that extracts the most colour information so when you go to edit and colour grade the footage you can have maximum freedom, it also catches the highlight better. Great when paired with 10 bit footage so you can grade to your desired image!
If you’re just starting however then Cine D is good enough :)
@@TalesOfTam yes I know that. But this vlog profile you need to buy it ? Or unlock it ?
@@gonzapaschetta for the GH5 you would need to buy it if you’re buying brand new, but to be honest they don’t sell brand new so chances are on the used market you can find a GH5 with V-Log already bought :)