Quick Q: are you partial to Instantly over Snov for running the campaigns? pretty sure Snov can do that too, might be easier to consolidate tools? haven't run these yet myself so just curious
@@kiaorioncreative I know Thomas prefers Instantly, but Snov's been doing a lot of feature development, so if it's good it's good. When you go through 200kf, I'll have a checklist of like, "Your email sending tool needs to do all of these things" so if Snov ticks all the boxes, it's fine by me. (A different student was asking me about using her pre-existing ECRM as well)
Hey, nice to meet you. :) The logic of Snov vs. apollo for emails is that Snov has a much better and more thorough quality process for email addresses. If you're enjoying apollo as your leads DB, you could test this by using an email checker tool (to check for bounces, etc) on a sample of ~100 domains from apollo, and then grab emails for those domains from snov and compare. The cold outreach pro, Thomas, whom I've worked with and partnered on the course was quite adamant about not using emails straight out of apollo due to data quality issues. Something like snov or hunter will help make sure your emails are going to the right people. (But you could always split test a campaign where you send half to apollo emails and half to snov emails and let us all know how your reply rates differ :) )
This episode is FIRE
Quick Q: are you partial to Instantly over Snov for running the campaigns? pretty sure Snov can do that too, might be easier to consolidate tools? haven't run these yet myself so just curious
Thanks brudder
@@kiaorioncreative I know Thomas prefers Instantly, but Snov's been doing a lot of feature development, so if it's good it's good. When you go through 200kf, I'll have a checklist of like, "Your email sending tool needs to do all of these things" so if Snov ticks all the boxes, it's fine by me. (A different student was asking me about using her pre-existing ECRM as well)
We use apollo (new to your teaching) and have had good lucky. what does Snov do differently that makes it worth the purchase?
Hey, nice to meet you. :) The logic of Snov vs. apollo for emails is that Snov has a much better and more thorough quality process for email addresses. If you're enjoying apollo as your leads DB, you could test this by using an email checker tool (to check for bounces, etc) on a sample of ~100 domains from apollo, and then grab emails for those domains from snov and compare. The cold outreach pro, Thomas, whom I've worked with and partnered on the course was quite adamant about not using emails straight out of apollo due to data quality issues. Something like snov or hunter will help make sure your emails are going to the right people. (But you could always split test a campaign where you send half to apollo emails and half to snov emails and let us all know how your reply rates differ :) )