Some key truths here but other important factors are missing ; when the Digital market was gaining pace, Kodak made a "standards" comparison between real Film & Digital ; they concluded, Digital will not meet/ reach Film Quality for decades if ever. In a sense Kodak was correct in principle... large format Film today inc Imax motion picture, well exceeds Digital,,, ( for ultimate resolving , a Film Negative will always surpass Digital ; there is no limit to size of Neg captured image ). ............................................................................................................ High end Qualities do not necessarily translate to profitability. Remember when Electronic Video Cameras displaced 16mm "News" Film Cameras by 1980. The Quality of Video (??) then , was a fraction of the Film Cameras it displaced. It was all about "Cost & Convenience" as it was with Digital in 2003 - the digital image quality was poor, very poor and Kodak misjudged the rate of change ; Film being displaced "so early" by a product with an "inferior" resolving quality... ............................................................................................................. The TIMING factor ; the sale of Computers mirrors that of Digital Cameras, plus the improving Photo & Video editing along with "low priced" quality Printers... that's what accelerated Kodak's dilemma , more than any other in the overall Market...! The point we can take from this is ; the Market today is more prepared to sacrifice Quality against Cost and Convenience - products don't need to last long in a disposable society ; just like most Photo's today - never even printed...
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
Some key truths here but other important factors are missing ; when the Digital market was gaining pace, Kodak made a "standards" comparison between real Film & Digital ; they concluded, Digital will not meet/ reach Film Quality for decades if ever. In a sense Kodak was correct in principle... large format Film today inc Imax motion picture, well exceeds Digital,,,
( for ultimate resolving , a Film Negative will always surpass Digital ; there is no limit to size of Neg captured image ).
............................................................................................................
High end Qualities do not necessarily translate to profitability. Remember when Electronic Video Cameras displaced 16mm "News" Film Cameras by 1980. The Quality of Video (??) then , was a fraction of the Film Cameras it displaced.
It was all about "Cost & Convenience" as it was with Digital in 2003 - the digital image quality was poor, very poor and
Kodak misjudged the rate of change ; Film being displaced "so early" by a product with an "inferior" resolving quality...
.............................................................................................................
The TIMING factor ; the sale of Computers mirrors that of Digital Cameras, plus the improving Photo & Video editing along with "low priced" quality Printers... that's what accelerated Kodak's dilemma , more than any other in the overall Market...! The point we can take from this is ; the Market today is more prepared to sacrifice Quality against Cost and Convenience - products don't need to last long in a disposable society ; just like most Photo's today - never even printed...
Nice sharing 👍👍👍