@@mabusestestamentbeing misunderstood has two options: -genius -insane However, the funny thing is that geniuses in some cases appear to be insane for most people, as they are too evolved for their generation. Step by step into the unknown, the genius is not aware, but he is building the road for the generations to come.
I hate to say it, but Jordan misquotes him. He doesn't say "I can write in a sentence what it takes another man a book to write," instead, he says, "I wish to be able to write in a sentence what it takes another man a book to write." He wasn't being arrogant, he was being hopeful.
Everything about this video has done greatly. From the AI generated arts, music to the voice of the content creator. Well done, keep doing what you are doing. I really enjoyed the content 😌
That saying about he who has a why, that is so inspiring to me. I've heard it various times in the past, and it always just fills me with an urge to pick up my goals and fight through any situation they put me in, for the greater benefit the goals will bring
“ I can write in one sentence what it would take others a book to write “ - Nietzsche “ I can write in one book what it would take others to say in a sentence” - Peterson
A very under appreciated, overlooked, great philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche was. I really enjoy all the works he done and his view towards bettering one’s self. Really outstanding work he made with the utmost delicacy put into it to make it speak to the corr of humanity in revealing what being human is and how to overcome the faults plagued amongst humanity
I'm reading bits of beyond good and evil on and off. gotta say everytime I read a paragraph I'm in awe it's very mentally stimulating he takes you to the edge and conclusion of every idea. I like when he shits on other philosophers his shit talk is very accurate
I had never heard of Nietzsche before, but I must say that the quality of the video and the work put into structuring it makes me want to research a little more. Thx
just read one book and you will go into the abyss do not worry there will be one to guide you through who is known as Nietzsche and once you come back from that abyss you will meet a new man, an enlightened man. But i must say to read nietzsche you must read two more books one being the Schopenhauer's the world as will and represtation and kant's the critique of pure reason. Then you will have a better understanding. there are book that are recommended to read before Nietzsche for me I had read Kant in detail before reading Nietzsche, and when I started reading Nietzsche and some unfamiliar names popped up, I left reading Nietzsche to read that person's main work first. so that is also a way but not recommended. Do not start with the birth of tragedy, start with the genealogy of morals instead.
@@Coolnfts123 thats a valueable insight but after evaluating your ideas I've to say that this is not necessary to the full extent. Its useful for a better understanding and context, but I believe that you dont have to read it in depth in order to understand Nietzsche. ChatGPT version-4 is already actually super-intelligent and very cohesive. It can practically summarize and even give details about the core ideas of those philosophers and their set of believes. You can easily ask GPT for a detailed summary and then ask further questions if you dont understand specific points. After having done that with Schopenhauer and Kant, you're good to delve deeply into the work of Nietzsche. I myself, around 10 years ago read Nietzsche without having read Schopenhauer and Kant, understood him fine and got depressed as well :)
@@zjaeger1800Using gpt to read a philosopher like Nietzsche, is a waste. Believe I support ai to the fullest I even work with llms, but philosophy is subjective, reading summary which is from a subjective source with having the full context is somewhat a waste of time in my perspective. Gpt is extremely biased, most people would think the opposite so I would recommend to read books rather then just gpteing
Its like instead of focusing on how you can redistribute wealth, instead focus on how you can raise the standard of living and the quality of culture for all people
Yeah, some reference to sources would be nice to qualify what is being purported. Why would Nietzsche emphasize collective goals for his followers if the point is to have those followers evaluate their own values? Still a good video, but I also am not convinced of that part.
@@robertscott3732They didn't ask how you can have collective goals, rather that he is not buying, and I'm not either, that Nietzsche wanted his followers to pursue collective goals, as such.
@arturzathas499 Now I go alone, my disciples, You too, go now alone. Thus I want it. Go away from me and resist Zarathustra! And even better: be ashamed of him! Perhaps he deceived you… One pays a teacher badly if one always remains nothing but a pupil. And why do you not want to pluck at my wreath? You revere me; but what if your reverence tumbles one day? Beware lest a statue slay you. You say that you believe in Zarathustra? But what matters Zarathustra? You are my believers - but what matter all believers? You had not yet sought yourselves; and you found me. Thus do all believers; therefore all faith amounts to so little. Now I bid you to lose me and find yourselves; and only then when you have all denied me will I return to you. Maybe collective in the sense that we are all going our own way but do not think that we are a movement or an ideology or a common force. The ubermench will come from us finding our own path.
part 1: emancipation part 2: respond (see the difference between responding and reacting) part 3: push yourself ( is it the only way to find your limits - which in turn gives you a platform to better yourself - and ultimately know thyself) part 4: accept who you are (it is the first step to controlling what you can do)
This is a brief but excellent introduction to the life & thought of Friedrich Nietzsche; some of your images are superb. You should now extend this video with references to Schopenhauer, Darwin, & Wagner...as well as by including his ideas on the master/slave morality, the will to power, & the eternal recurrence of this same universe. Nietzsche focused on the lasting value of a superior individual, not on the collective herd. Reacting to those comments below, it must be stressed that Nietzsche's ill health & death had nothing to do with his impressive creativity & remarkable genius. Yes, Nietzsche's profound worldview has greatly influenced the ongoing evolution of philosophy forever. Prof. Dr. Dr. H. James Birx, New York
I clicked on this bc I loved the title of the video... but then almost immediately, he uses the cartoon superman to say that is wha tNietzsche meant for the overrman, that is definitely what he did NOT mean when he said "Man is something to overcome, a bridge..."
I just can't get over the fact that nothing matters our world will end 100% surely and we will be forgotten in the dust of the universe...money makes us happy women make us happy ..but all of it will end ..maybe thats the reak beauty
@@jurassicthunder Hah! He'd have to learn to write a sentence first! But you remind me. A half page in _The Gay Science_ contains all the good parts of _Manufacturing Consent._ I was relieved when I found this out. Chomsky's linguistics and academic ethics were so terrible I don't like to quote him if I can avoid it.
Imagine quoting something as short as an aphorism and still editing out the second part - which is the most arrogant part of Nietzsche's statement: "what others do NOT say in an entire book".
Wow, Jordan: Nietzsche said, "It is my AMBITION to say in ten sentences...". He strove. I thought Pederson appreciated terse Scripture passages... which is a similar style. And then, to label anyone as "... THE MOST..." of anything, is itself, a very arrogant position for Pederson to take.
When you are young, your body is the best it will ever be, and you are like a god. As you age, you lose your youthfulness, and your powers are stripped away. You lose your god-like qualities, and fall further away from the ubermensch state, never to be regained. And death is the great equalizer, as no matter what path you take in life, you always end up at the same destination as everyone else - dead. But even with struggle and heartache, you can choose to live your best life, to walk along the best path that you can muster. And it will be worth it, because you will have raised children to be their best selves, and interacted with others in a way that makes them lead their best lives, and to be a part of that is enough.
I think you do get some of the main points right, but I do notice that some of your viewpoints align with capitalist ideology, which Nietzsche criticizesed (look up Nietzsche on money makers). Also using Peterson in the beginning also kind of undermines the whole video, as Peterson struggles to understand Nietzsche himself.
Hey. Grat video as usual. But could you mix the images with the footage as you did before? You have a great way of editing. I guess this new way is easier maybe. But a half/half mix should do. Just a small suggestion. Take it or leave it 😉
Neitzche didn't "solve everything". He pointed out the logical conclusion of acccepting Darwinian evolution: nihilism. 'Beyond Good & Evil' is called that because in a purely naturalistic, mechanical universe such as what we see in evolutionary theory, the is no such thing as right or wrong. There is no 'goodwill,' as Kant would say. There is only the will to power.
@@noobzie8963 and that's according to Neitzche, that there is only the will to power. Or, at least, that the will to power is more important than the will to Truth
@@jamespierce5355His point was that fundamentally life’s highest purpose is a will, (a life) force that seeks to express it’s power in the world in all its different forms. A flower growing through the crack of a sidewalk etc… it strives. In nature, we see a hierarchy of life forms and life rewards those with the greatest will along with health & strength. This produces beauty. It’s fine to be a good person. But good people must understand that goodness requires power to do good. It’s not enough to believe you are good if in reality you are just weak.
@@bryanutility9609 to me power implies authority and control, which is incompatible with ultimate truth. I think maybe 'strength' would be a better word. They are similar words, but strength does not carry the same connotation of control in my opinion
"Nietzsche said, 'God is dead, and we are the ones who killed him.' He didn't mean that in a literal sense." Well damn, up until just now I thought for sure that we literally killed God.
i dont think Nietsche wanted people to become millionaires because of their anger, keeping in mind you can do great things for society if you would set your mind to it. Becoming a millionaire should only be because you want to make the world better (my opinion)
Great video but why do you put people like alex hormozi and things like money in the same context as nietzsches believes? His believes are much greater than ghese temporary things
Nietzsche didn't solve everything. The spirit of his philosophy leads to more questions than answers. Nietzsche was a perspectivist and a philosopher of becoming. Everything is flux as Heraclitus who inspired Nietzsches philosophy wrote. Even truth?!
"what doesn't kill you only makes you stronger" I call that bull S. ! I have suffered a lot, I had many surgeries, felt unbearable pain, my mind went to really extreme places and my thoughts are very clouded by it all, I pushed through, I'm still suffering, and looking back, I'm not stronger in any way than I was before, there were no lessons to learn, nor I had to change my way of living because what happened was my fault (for example an alcoholic who had liver problmes ) what happened to me it was just chance, random chaos of the universe we seem to inhabit. A much more accurate statement could be "what doesn't kill you left you in the ground, unable to rise up, only looking to the sky and dreaming about the relief that would be death, no more suffering, no more pain, no more misery"
Im probably coming of as a uncaring/harsh “person” right now, but that is what this vid was about: what you said that happend to you weakend you physically, but it’s about having the mentality to let go of what happend to you and live on with a smile and a sense of purpose and fulfillment, no matter how little reason you have to smile compared to others. It’s a matter of perspective. You sound like you have resentment towards life and the unfortunate things that have been happening, let that resentment/sense of injustice go, and the weight of how much “ life genuinely sucks” will go with it. This is how you will become superior to others, despite the damages, you still can be better than most. You know thats true I dont know what injuries you got and im not enjoying full health ether, maybe you cant walk, maybe you can. But I know based on what you typed your head is still good enough to turn it into a powerhouse
@@truffelnootje I can walk, but I'm in pain everyday, sometimes it's not that bad, sometimes I don't want to feel nothing anymore, my point is that I can't see how what happened to me it's something good or "I'm better now than before just because I'm alive" I don't think so, I'm worse at everything, one could say "well you're weak minded, you're in pain ? Enjoy it " or whatever bullshit they come up with, I know I can't live the rest of my life feeling sorry for myself or saying "it's all so unfair" but I have reasons to be bitter and resent life, it's a rabbit hole , I know that too, I'm not asking for help, I'm just saying that quote, it doesn't work for me, maybe for other people it can be valuable, for other situations
@@johnf.r6658If you think Nietzsche wants you to enjoy your suffering, you are mistaken. Strength here is nothing more than the magnitude of your ability to endure the burden and suffering of following certain wills. The quote is worth little without context. But hey, you probably do deal better with suffering, than most. You mentioned how you resent the randomness of your circumstances and Nietzsche recognizes this as something innately human. Lamenting the past and the randomness thereof is part of the greatest threat everyone faces. He calls it the Spirit of Revenge. It is the call to nihilism itself, the randomness and absolution the past holds over ourselves. Suffering for Nietzsche is not something to enjoy and his Zarathustra laments and fears suffering immensely. Instead, his lesson is to give it purpose through your will. To alleviate the randomness by giving meaning to circumstances through a form of art. Here a few quotes on the matter: “And how could I endure to be a man, if man were not also the composer, and riddle-reader, and redeemer of chance! To redeem what is past, and to transform every “It was” into “Thus would I have it!”-that only do I call redemption!” “One thing is needful. -- To "give style" to one’s character-- a great and rare art! It is practiced by those who survey all the strengths and weaknesses of their nature and then fit them into an artistic plan until every one of them appears as art and reason and even weaknesses delight the eye. Here a large mass of second nature has been added; there a piece of original nature has been removed -- both times through long practice and daily work at it. Here the ugly that could not be removed is concealed; there it has been reinterpreted and made sublime. Much that is vague and resisted shaping has been saved and exploited for distant views; it is meant to beckon toward the far and immeasurable.”
@@Brien831 thanks for the reply, I agree, that famous quote alone doesn't do much for me. I wouldn't dare to call myself an artist, sounds pretentious, but I do write my own songs and play guitar, I made some lyrics that reflects on the awful things that I have suffered and still I'm going trough, when I listen to what I did, it doesn't bring me joy necessary, but it's meaningful for me, and helped me more than all the therapy and all the talking to doctors and the empathy of other people, that either care on a very superficial way about me, or just feel sorry for what happened to me, none of those scenarios make me feel better, I feel anger and shame respectively towards those 2 groups of people, but anyways, I should read more Nietzsche, and sorry for rambling and consider that English isn't my first language so there's that, perhaps what I wrote doesn't make much sense
very nice video but i find it funny that most of the imagery is AI generated muscular men, as if the only way to put his words into action is through exercise and physique. Nietzsche talked about mental strength or willpower which is achievable by any man woman or child who is dedicated enough, i believe this conceptual idea of philosophers being in peak physical condition is outdated although the greeks saw it as necessary, in modern society we don't need to place such a high value on physiques and rather on freethinking. Jordan Peterson is part of the problem imo
Ehh, unfortunately for Nietzche hos philosophy tends to break down in the practical application of it and his philosophy does almost the opposite of what it was intended to, which was liberation. Obviously there were other factors for his insanity but I will always maintain that one of the factors of Nietzche going made was him following his own world view. If you want a more meaningful philosophy that is similar to Nietzche but doesn't involved the self obsession, read Dostevsky.
@aviatordanz no Nietzches philosophy doesnt break down it just tells where you are and where you need to be to achieve freedom. But bc you are coping so hard that instead of acknowledging that you are not free where you are. You just change the meaning of what it means to be free and try to deny the point nietzche made. You could say this a freedom but its simply the freedom to hide.
Nietzsche never quite answered "why" we must aspire to be superhuman? If in the end existing is as good as not existing, or at least existing is just a prelude to non-existing, why must anyone do anything at all? Hevel, hevel, vanity of vanities, saith the preacher. Nietzsche's declaration that God is dead is not to be taken in the promethean sense that it is usually interpreted. Rather, God's death is a profound tragedy. Hence why Nietzsche makes a madman declare it. It is not so much that God is dead, but that Europe had, in its hubris, lost the ability to have faith. That too, not all of Europe. Western Europe specifically, which broke away from worldview in which Logos was at the centre of human existence. The rupture with the old world happened in the Protestant rejection of Catholicism and it's intellectual tradition that held Truth, Goodness and Beauty in balance. Modern world is essentially the three solas without God behind it. I am self-sufficient. My own mind is enough. My interpretation is supreme. Nietzsche's philosophy most certainly did not improve the lives of people. Nazis were inspired by his vision. His own sister was an incurable antisemite. For a man who raged against pity, Nietzsche fell victim to his own humanity. Nietzsche collapsed in Turin while trying to protect a horse being flogged. 19th, 20th and 21st century is simply a tragic world. Without Magesterium, there is only the morass of conflicting interpretations.
The true superhuman is a saint, transfigured in the image of Christ. Nietzsche wanted a godless, demonic superhuman who can crush the weak under his heels. That has been tried and it has failed. Read the epic of Gilgamesh. In the end, it is pity that saved him.
The professor and teaching assistant for a Nietzsche course in college said Nietzsche does not give a rigorous philosophical justification for his views. So I have the same question your comment starts with. Given his views that there are not objective truths, it seems like that would be consistent, but doesn’t answer the question. I guess since we have to make decisions (even if it’s to do nothing) attempt to do what we each think is best?
@@lonelycubicle: It is utterly arbitrary though, isn't it? What does "best" stand for in your sentence? What we each think is "best"? Based on what? This is the kind of mushy thinking that passes for philosophy these days. There is no good, better, bad and worst without a cogent canon of values to hang these labels on. We can say I travelled a 1000 kilo meters to get here, but this is compared to a single kilo meter, which is itself measured against meter and so on and so forth. So when you say "best", the question is as compared to what? What is the unit of measurement you're using? Yourself? What are you? You'd have to say, I am human. Now, we'd have to ask: What does it mean to be human? Of course, for this we must start with the question of the ideal man, which cannot be answered without accounting for the moral reality of man. We can only quantify and grade quality with a standard, like say 24 karat gold. The ideal man is Christ, saith this Catholic.
@@Ordinary_Catholic If the world’s best philosophers/thinkers [add whatever groups of people should be included] can not agree on what is the best way to live a life, people have to make decisions and what is left except for each person to attempt to live their life as best they can? That’s all I meant by ‘best’. My main point about Nietzsche is that since he says, “… facts is precisely what there is not, only interpretations” (WP § 481)”, why follow his interpretations/prescriptions?
@@lonelycubicle That is precisely my point. The world's best philosophers cannot agree on anything, let alone morals. That is precisely the value of philosophy. It shows the inadequacy of vacuous ratiocination based on premises that are themselves yet to be demonstrated to be true. Now there are two alternatives. To brute force your way through life, to act as if good and evil does not exist, that objective truth is a lie, and "only interpretations" exist. Or you can go beyond yourself in another way - through faith and revelation. Clearly, you prefer the first. But I have to ask, do you actually live as if there is no objective reality, that there are only interpretations. For me, how we live is the test of our philosophical fidelity. I don't know where you live, but let's say you're a New Yorker and you get mugged and stabbed in a dingy alleyway, would you still hold to your proposition that there are no moral absolutes? And that the man who stabbed and stole your wallet was simply living his "will to power" in the "best way" he can? Let us raise the stakes even further. Let us say it happens to your mother or your sister or daughter, would you still hold on to your proposition? I'm sure you'll say a distinctly, objectively evil act was committed, and I pray to God you never have to come to this point in life. But I have made my point. Men like Nietzsche at long last were never willing to put their money where their mouths are. And those who did wreaked extraordinary destruction upon humanity. And you think the saints of the Catholic Church were some spineless men who dared not go where Nietzsche went? St Augustine had already seen what Nietzsche saw. He even called named the problem: Libido Dominandi, the Lust to Dominate. You only need to read the City of God. Bottom line is this: We as humanity have been there, tried that and now have the t-shirt. Nietzsche is dead. I recommend watch Hitchcock's The Rope, a wonderful movie that takes Nietzschean Will to Power to it's logical conclusion.
Nietzsche lacked common experiences that are a basis for much of human society and morality.. of course he was very intelligent and perceptive and his philosophy is very interesting and in many ways enlightening.. however the way he is interpreted leads me to think that he lacked two experiences that are key.. I don't know if he ever really hurt anyone in his life.. I mean hurt them very deeply like breaking the heart of a young girl.. surely he would feel remorse for the pain he caused.. The other experience is that of having children and a family.. this lack of experience surely colors the way that he analyzed life and society.
thats completly true. One of the most wise things to know before reading a philosopher is to realize and to admit that the world the author is producing and judging about is simply his world, build around his experience of life mostly as a (subjective) deduction. Even if some deductions are true objectively, it is always the sum and the point of view that determines how bright the world or life can be. Nietzsche did not seem to have much fullfillment in life in terms of receiving and showing love.
I’m deeply Christian, but I always thought that _if_ God didn’t exist then Nietzsche would be most correct of the atheistic philosophers that I know of.
Nietzsche doesnt say God doesnt exist, that isnt what God is dead means. He says the full committed believe in God as giver of objective truths and morals is not possible anymore.
@@Brien831 Ok but he also didn’t believe in Christianity and thought it perpetuated Slave Morality. He thought that Christianity subverted the strength-based might-makes-right Master Morality of the ancient world. In his view- now that Christianity had “fallen” it was up to a new generation of Masters to create a new system out of the ashes.
Whatever you do: Don't donate to "cancer research", which is just funding torture and propaganda. Rather, support efforts to inform the public of the healing modalities that have proven effective; like clean, low-carb diets and saltwater fasting.
He didnt solve everything, but his reevaluation of all values should be used on him aswell, to really transcend him. Better to find the flaws and individuate yourself then to follow nietzche. I personally think his focus on "ought" claims, is his biggest mistanke, as If the true individual couldnt find his own path, and has to be told by nietzche how to live.
Individual doesn’t mean simply pernicious and pedantic. I don’t think Nietzsche ever demanded that people follow him religiously , I’m pretty sure this video isn’t advocating it either . Rather that by reading his works one might discern some useful information which hadn’t been previously accessed or perhaps to provide an alternative angle to validate and ratify one’s existing ideas . There is a false saying, ‘Whoever cannot save himself - how can he save others?’ But if I have the key to your chains, why should your and my lock be the same.” I’m am quite sure within his works I personally would find more sentences of pertinence and use than in any of the publications which you have written but would be willing to be proven wrong if you are willing to direct me to you most well considered contribution . Nobody is perfect but we are all perfect imperfections
@@guzgrant Well feel free to tell me how ones supposed to interprate his seemings on "slaves and master morality", "the ubermensch" and "will to power" that doesnt imply any ought claims from his side. I sometimes wonder what early nietzche would say about his later works. I personally love his Key and chain analogy, i also use many of his bits of wisdom, but that doesnt mean i have to buy into it all. As for my own ideas, i dont spread them without caution, there is context and a place and time for everything. Infact one of the biggest ironies in nietzche is he himself being co-opted by the religious, which always makes me laugh, and i cant think of a Better philosopher to be used in that way. His ideas on suffering in perticular. His reevaluation of all values is the only ought claim i actually follow, as that allows me to use it on him aswell, as for the rest, im perfectly able to find out how one ought to act on my own, thats the whole point of being an individual as i see it
@@DeadEndFrog I mean for Nietzsche was Austrian for one thing so the literal dissection of language would be best forgiven as generic imperfect parallels and considered as part of widoer context and the point being illustrated and less so dwelled upon and scrutinised as a claimed or intended individual semantic truth ..
Lmao, why would you think Nietzsche wants to show a path? A major point of Thus Spoke Zarathustra is, that there are no paths and your’ and Zarathustra’s disappear right behind the, You fundamentally misunderstood him, if you think he gives any advice on what you ought to do and how to live.
Altogether a good video, but I feel like you’re trying too hard to house Nietzsche within traditional morals. You make him out to be just another preacher of virtue and altruism; in reality, he was fundamentally opposed to such ideas.
Well he definitely didn't solve everything and he has to give credit to Hinduism for where he got many of his ideas. We can move forward as a species if we stop idolizing flawed human beings
Join my weekly newsletter, if you don’t gain value or knowledge from each email, unsubscribe hassle free
subscribepage.io/BN4ChH
"He who has a why, can tolerate almost any how." Similar to Frankel. Meaning in life.
Frankl quotes that quite often in Man's Search for Meaning
Not similar. Frankl literally took that from Nietzsche.
Frankl's career summarized in one sentence.
“To be great is to be misunderstood.” - Ralph Waldo Emerson whom Nietzsche described as “a glorious, great nature, rich in soul and spirit.”
On the other hand, being misunderstood doesn’t mean you’re great 😉
@@mabusestestamenthe he, people often miss that
I love you too, hnviejhiwdhnfwodfsdfdfs 😘
Also a racist sexist anti semite...
@@mabusestestamentbeing misunderstood has two options:
-genius
-insane
However, the funny thing is that geniuses in some cases appear to be insane for most people, as they are too evolved for their generation.
Step by step into the unknown, the genius is not aware, but he is building the road for the generations to come.
I hate to say it, but Jordan misquotes him. He doesn't say "I can write in a sentence what it takes another man a book to write," instead, he says, "I wish to be able to write in a sentence what it takes another man a book to write." He wasn't being arrogant, he was being hopeful.
All philosophy read today is misinterpreted by idiots.
@@ASTR0TALKSPHILOSOPHY No, but it does happen a lot.
You just misinterpreted my philosophy.@@CameronABrodie
@@ASTR0TALKSPHILOSOPHY how?
@@CameronABrodieshut up
"the only thing you should fear is not being yourself" amazing
what a trip, man
with such a less views ... this was the best video of Nietzsche
you deserve much more views
Everything about this video has done greatly. From the AI generated arts, music to the voice of the content creator. Well done, keep doing what you are doing. I really enjoyed the content 😌
You can tell he was a great philosopher because of how insanely beautiful his mustache was.
That saying about he who has a why, that is so inspiring to me. I've heard it various times in the past, and it always just fills me with an urge to pick up my goals and fight through any situation they put me in, for the greater benefit the goals will bring
This is an insanely high quality video. Just subscribed. I’ll watch anything you produce.
“ I can write in one sentence what it would take others a book to write “ - Nietzsche
“ I can write in one book what it would take others to say in a sentence” - Peterson
"God is dead" -Nietzsche
"Nietzsche is dead!" - God
@@dromeus21God never existed. Nietzsche is immortal.
This is it
@@kentjensen4504logically unsound considering everything you presume to make neitzche immortal makes god immortal in the same way
@@tommytwo-times9053 That was just my way of saying Nietzsche is famous. Calm down.
A very under appreciated, overlooked, great philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche was.
I really enjoy all the works he done and his view towards bettering one’s self.
Really outstanding work he made with the utmost delicacy put into it to make it speak to the corr of humanity in revealing what being human is and how to overcome the faults plagued amongst humanity
I've never heard music that has made me feel beautifully melancholy inside. This channel has instantly became my favorite.
One of the best video I’ve seen on philosophy on TH-cam. Keep it up.
Nietzsche wasn't talking about money 10:21
I'm reading bits of beyond good and evil on and off. gotta say everytime I read a paragraph I'm in awe it's very mentally stimulating he takes you to the edge and conclusion of every idea. I like when he shits on other philosophers his shit talk is very accurate
This is one of the best postings I’ve heard in weeks. Thanks 👍
Excellent
But please dont rush videos
Take your time and do your best
Quality over quantity is what we desperately need
Yeah, I’ve had a backlog building up for a while, should calm down a bit now though 😂
This was a great video. Short, pithy, visually clean and satisfying, and actionable wisdom.
I had never heard of Nietzsche before, but I must say that the quality of the video and the work put into structuring it makes me want to research a little more. Thx
just read one book and you will go into the abyss do not worry there will be one to guide you through who is known as Nietzsche and once you come back from that abyss you will meet a new man, an enlightened man. But i must say to read nietzsche you must read two more books one being the Schopenhauer's the world as will and represtation and kant's the critique of pure reason. Then you will have a better understanding. there are book that are recommended to read before Nietzsche for me I had read Kant in detail before reading Nietzsche, and when I started reading Nietzsche and some unfamiliar names popped up, I left reading Nietzsche to read that person's main work first. so that is also a way but not recommended. Do not start with the birth of tragedy, start with the genealogy of morals instead.
@@Coolnfts123 thats a valueable insight but after evaluating your ideas I've to say that this is not necessary to the full extent. Its useful for a better understanding and context, but I believe that you dont have to read it in depth in order to understand Nietzsche. ChatGPT version-4 is already actually super-intelligent and very cohesive. It can practically summarize and even give details about the core ideas of those philosophers and their set of believes. You can easily ask GPT for a detailed summary and then ask further questions if you dont understand specific points. After having done that with Schopenhauer and Kant, you're good to delve deeply into the work of Nietzsche. I myself, around 10 years ago read Nietzsche without having read Schopenhauer and Kant, understood him fine and got depressed as well :)
@@zjaeger1800Using gpt to read a philosopher like Nietzsche, is a waste. Believe I support ai to the fullest I even work with llms, but philosophy is subjective, reading summary which is from a subjective source with having the full context is somewhat a waste of time in my perspective. Gpt is extremely biased, most people would think the opposite so I would recommend to read books rather then just gpteing
Not quite buying that nietzche wanted us to pursue collective goals
Its like instead of focusing on how you can redistribute wealth, instead focus on how you can raise the standard of living and the quality of culture for all people
Yeah, some reference to sources would be nice to qualify what is being purported.
Why would Nietzsche emphasize collective goals for his followers if the point is to have those followers evaluate their own values?
Still a good video, but I also am not convinced of that part.
@@robertscott3732They didn't ask how you can have collective goals, rather that he is not buying, and I'm not either, that Nietzsche wanted his followers to pursue collective goals, as such.
the ubermensch he talked about is supposed to be our (collective) creation. he thought it is our duty to sacrifice ourselves for that goal.
@arturzathas499 Now I go alone, my disciples, You too, go now alone. Thus I want it. Go away from me and resist Zarathustra! And even better: be ashamed of him! Perhaps he deceived you… One pays a teacher badly if one always remains nothing but a pupil. And why do you not want to pluck at my wreath? You revere me; but what if your reverence tumbles one day? Beware lest a statue slay you. You say that you believe in Zarathustra? But what matters Zarathustra? You are my believers - but what matter all believers? You had not yet sought yourselves; and you found me. Thus do all believers; therefore all faith amounts to so little. Now I bid you to lose me and find yourselves; and only then when you have all denied me will I return to you.
Maybe collective in the sense that we are all going our own way but do not think that we are a movement or an ideology or a common force. The ubermench will come from us finding our own path.
Who knew Nietzsche lifted so much.
He has more gains than DBZ characters.
this video was amazing tbh idk why it only has 1.8 k views it deserves more .
Awesome video! Excellent explanation!
we live in a sick society, they want you to be average human, if you go for superhuman they call you narcissist
This is the right video at the right time for me! Thanks!
part 1: emancipation
part 2: respond (see the difference between responding and reacting)
part 3: push yourself ( is it the only way to find your limits - which in turn gives you a platform to better yourself - and ultimately know thyself)
part 4: accept who you are (it is the first step to controlling what you can do)
also, nietzsche is to be sensed, not understood. that's why so many have trouble with him
@@arturzathas499 can you explain this distinction?
This is a brief but excellent introduction to the life & thought of Friedrich Nietzsche; some of your images are superb. You should now extend this
video with references to Schopenhauer, Darwin, & Wagner...as well as by including his ideas on the master/slave morality, the will to power, & the eternal recurrence of this same universe. Nietzsche focused on the lasting value of a superior individual, not on the collective herd. Reacting to those comments below, it must be stressed that Nietzsche's ill health & death had nothing to do with his impressive creativity & remarkable genius. Yes, Nietzsche's profound worldview has greatly influenced the ongoing evolution of philosophy forever. Prof. Dr. Dr. H. James Birx, New York
I clicked on this bc I loved the title of the video... but then almost immediately, he uses the cartoon superman to say that is wha tNietzsche meant for the overrman, that is definitely what he did NOT mean when he said "Man is something to overcome, a bridge..."
I just can't get over the fact that nothing matters our world will end 100% surely and we will be forgotten in the dust of the universe...money makes us happy women make us happy ..but all of it will end ..maybe thats the reak beauty
Nietasche was quite right that he could write in a sentence what others would take a book to write.
something that Jordan Peterson wishes to do but can't
@@jurassicthunder Hah! He'd have to learn to write a sentence first!
But you remind me. A half page in _The Gay Science_ contains all the good parts of _Manufacturing Consent._ I was relieved when I found this out. Chomsky's linguistics and academic ethics were so terrible I don't like to quote him if I can avoid it.
Imagine quoting something as short as an aphorism and still editing out the second part - which is the most arrogant part of Nietzsche's statement: "what others do NOT say in an entire book".
A man's philosophy is his own:
It will never fit anyone so well as himself;
and, even then, it will begin to pinch.
Thank you, I needed this, and subscribed!
Most Understood ! His Time Is Not come Yet He Was 26th century In the 8th century
Thank you
What you say about his sister is no longer believed to be accurate. You should look into that and consider updating. Great video, all the same.
Wow, Jordan: Nietzsche said, "It is my AMBITION to say in ten sentences...". He strove. I thought Pederson appreciated terse Scripture passages... which is a similar style. And then, to label anyone as "... THE MOST..." of anything, is itself, a very arrogant position for Pederson to take.
When you are young, your body is the best it will ever be, and you are like a god. As you age, you lose your youthfulness, and your powers are stripped away. You lose your god-like qualities, and fall further away from the ubermensch state, never to be regained. And death is the great equalizer, as no matter what path you take in life, you always end up at the same destination as everyone else - dead. But even with struggle and heartache, you can choose to live your best life, to walk along the best path that you can muster. And it will be worth it, because you will have raised children to be their best selves, and interacted with others in a way that makes them lead their best lives, and to be a part of that is enough.
Reading the quotes might mistaken me into a philosopher sometimes.
Rude of me unable to remember some great names in a journey. 😅
Quoting Jordan was a bad start
My favorite philosopher that saved my life.
Elijah Oxford, nice work sir and keep up the awakening! Kindly regards 369
love the artwork
Perfect...thank you
I'm a nonachiever and I am happy this way.
I think you do get some of the main points right, but I do notice that some of your viewpoints align with capitalist ideology, which Nietzsche criticizesed (look up Nietzsche on money makers).
Also using Peterson in the beginning also kind of undermines the whole video, as Peterson struggles to understand Nietzsche himself.
very good video!
My brother where is the video on masculinity?
I'm quite enjoying this but the fingers keep bothering me. Please use 5 finger input when generating in mj
Hey. Grat video as usual. But could you mix the images with the footage as you did before? You have a great way of editing. I guess this new way is easier maybe. But a half/half mix should do. Just a small suggestion. Take it or leave it 😉
Truly the goat
Where can i find the idea of not following the master in his books?
Neitzche didn't "solve everything". He pointed out the logical conclusion of acccepting Darwinian evolution: nihilism.
'Beyond Good & Evil' is called that because in a purely naturalistic, mechanical universe such as what we see in evolutionary theory, the is no such thing as right or wrong. There is no 'goodwill,' as Kant would say. There is only the will to power.
Why is there only the will to power?
@noobzie8963 there is another: the will to Truth
@@noobzie8963 and that's according to Neitzche, that there is only the will to power. Or, at least, that the will to power is more important than the will to Truth
@@jamespierce5355His point was that fundamentally life’s highest purpose is a will, (a life) force that seeks to express it’s power in the world in all its different forms. A flower growing through the crack of a sidewalk etc… it strives. In nature, we see a hierarchy of life forms and life rewards those with the greatest will along with health & strength. This produces beauty.
It’s fine to be a good person. But good people must understand that goodness requires power to do good. It’s not enough to believe you are good if in reality you are just weak.
@@bryanutility9609 to me power implies authority and control, which is incompatible with ultimate truth. I think maybe 'strength' would be a better word. They are similar words, but strength does not carry the same connotation of control in my opinion
"Nietzsche said, 'God is dead, and we are the ones who killed him.' He didn't mean that in a literal sense."
Well damn, up until just now I thought for sure that we literally killed God.
Great video. May I ask how are you creating art for your videos?
This is AI.
Hey I already started thinking like this I had my questions
Obsessed ❤
One sentence. Nietzsche was a Sigma personality.
Great video.
But guess what sticks more, and stays with you a sentence or a book?
Where does the artwork come from? Stunning
Did you draw the illustrations as well? They are nice.
Nietzsche disaagrees with basically every opinion JP has. I don't know why he keeps bringing him up.
Those images are so good what AI did you use?
i dont think Nietsche wanted people to become millionaires because of their anger, keeping in mind you can do great things for society if you would set your mind to it. Becoming a millionaire should only be because you want to make the world better (my opinion)
Great video but why do you put people like alex hormozi and things like money in the same context as nietzsches believes? His believes are much greater than ghese temporary things
Nietzsche didn't solve everything. The spirit of his philosophy leads to more questions than answers. Nietzsche was a perspectivist and a philosopher of becoming. Everything is flux as
Heraclitus who inspired Nietzsches philosophy wrote. Even truth?!
Tbh, the expression how you explain his idea is kinda misleading. but it is inevitable.
"what doesn't kill you only makes you stronger" I call that bull S. ! I have suffered a lot, I had many surgeries, felt unbearable pain, my mind went to really extreme places and my thoughts are very clouded by it all, I pushed through, I'm still suffering, and looking back, I'm not stronger in any way than I was before, there were no lessons to learn, nor I had to change my way of living because what happened was my fault (for example an alcoholic who had liver problmes ) what happened to me it was just chance, random chaos of the universe we seem to inhabit. A much more accurate statement could be "what doesn't kill you left you in the ground, unable to rise up, only looking to the sky and dreaming about the relief that would be death, no more suffering, no more pain, no more misery"
Im probably coming of as a uncaring/harsh “person” right now, but that is what this vid was about: what you said that happend to you weakend you physically, but it’s about having the mentality to let go of what happend to you and live on with a smile and a sense of purpose and fulfillment, no matter how little reason you have to smile compared to others. It’s a matter of perspective. You sound like you have resentment towards life and the unfortunate things that have been happening, let that resentment/sense of injustice go, and the weight of how much “ life genuinely sucks” will go with it.
This is how you will become superior to others, despite the damages, you still can be better than most. You know thats true
I dont know what injuries you got and im not enjoying full health ether, maybe you cant walk, maybe you can. But I know based on what you typed your head is still good enough to turn it into a powerhouse
Nietszche has covered your case in the master slave morality concept.
@@truffelnootje I can walk, but I'm in pain everyday, sometimes it's not that bad, sometimes I don't want to feel nothing anymore, my point is that I can't see how what happened to me it's something good or "I'm better now than before just because I'm alive" I don't think so, I'm worse at everything, one could say "well you're weak minded, you're in pain ? Enjoy it " or whatever bullshit they come up with, I know I can't live the rest of my life feeling sorry for myself or saying "it's all so unfair" but I have reasons to be bitter and resent life, it's a rabbit hole , I know that too, I'm not asking for help, I'm just saying that quote, it doesn't work for me, maybe for other people it can be valuable, for other situations
@@johnf.r6658If you think Nietzsche wants you to enjoy your suffering, you are mistaken. Strength here is nothing more than the magnitude of your ability to endure the burden and suffering of following certain wills. The quote is worth little without context. But hey, you probably do deal better with suffering, than most.
You mentioned how you resent the randomness of your circumstances and Nietzsche recognizes this as something innately human. Lamenting the past and the randomness thereof is part of the greatest threat everyone faces. He calls it the Spirit of Revenge. It is the call to nihilism itself, the randomness and absolution the past holds over ourselves.
Suffering for Nietzsche is not something to enjoy and his Zarathustra laments and fears suffering immensely. Instead, his lesson is to give it purpose through your will. To alleviate the randomness by giving meaning to circumstances through a form of art. Here a few quotes on the matter:
“And how could I endure to be a man, if man were not also the composer, and riddle-reader, and redeemer of chance!
To redeem what is past, and to transform every “It was” into “Thus would I have it!”-that only do I call redemption!”
“One thing is needful. -- To "give style" to one’s character-- a great and rare art! It is practiced by those who survey all the strengths and weaknesses of their nature and then fit them into an artistic plan until every one of them appears as art and reason and even weaknesses delight the eye.
Here a large mass of second nature has been added; there a piece of original nature has been removed -- both times through long practice and daily work at it.
Here the ugly that could not be removed is concealed; there it has been reinterpreted and made sublime. Much that is vague and resisted shaping has been saved and exploited for distant views; it is meant to beckon toward the far and immeasurable.”
@@Brien831 thanks for the reply, I agree, that famous quote alone doesn't do much for me. I wouldn't dare to call myself an artist, sounds pretentious, but I do write my own songs and play guitar, I made some lyrics that reflects on the awful things that I have suffered and still I'm going trough, when I listen to what I did, it doesn't bring me joy necessary, but it's meaningful for me, and helped me more than all the therapy and all the talking to doctors and the empathy of other people, that either care on a very superficial way about me, or just feel sorry for what happened to me, none of those scenarios make me feel better, I feel anger and shame respectively towards those 2 groups of people, but anyways, I should read more Nietzsche, and sorry for rambling and consider that English isn't my first language so there's that, perhaps what I wrote doesn't make much sense
So why did he write books?
excellent video, but at 6:48 it must be spelled "bear" not "bare".
Great video. Does anyone know who drew the thumbnail? (Also featured @6:46)
First second into the video and I already had to close the page. God I just can't stand Peterson.
very nice video but i find it funny that most of the imagery is AI generated muscular men, as if the only way to put his words into action is through exercise and physique. Nietzsche talked about mental strength or willpower which is achievable by any man woman or child who is dedicated enough, i believe this conceptual idea of philosophers being in peak physical condition is outdated although the greeks saw it as necessary, in modern society we don't need to place such a high value on physiques and rather on freethinking. Jordan Peterson is part of the problem imo
Ehh, unfortunately for Nietzche hos philosophy tends to break down in the practical application of it and his philosophy does almost the opposite of what it was intended to, which was liberation. Obviously there were other factors for his insanity but I will always maintain that one of the factors of Nietzche going made was him following his own world view.
If you want a more meaningful philosophy that is similar to Nietzche but doesn't involved the self obsession, read Dostevsky.
Only beauty can save the world.
@aviatordanz no Nietzches philosophy doesnt break down it just tells where you are and where you need to be to achieve freedom. But bc you are coping so hard that instead of acknowledging that you are not free where you are. You just change the meaning of what it means to be free and try to deny the point nietzche made. You could say this a freedom but its simply the freedom to hide.
Very useful knowledge for our generation. Can I help create Indonesian voice over version of each of your video?
Peterson is unable to say who is a genius and who isnt.
Nietzsche never quite answered "why" we must aspire to be superhuman? If in the end existing is as good as not existing, or at least existing is just a prelude to non-existing, why must anyone do anything at all? Hevel, hevel, vanity of vanities, saith the preacher. Nietzsche's declaration that God is dead is not to be taken in the promethean sense that it is usually interpreted. Rather, God's death is a profound tragedy. Hence why Nietzsche makes a madman declare it. It is not so much that God is dead, but that Europe had, in its hubris, lost the ability to have faith. That too, not all of Europe. Western Europe specifically, which broke away from worldview in which Logos was at the centre of human existence. The rupture with the old world happened in the Protestant rejection of Catholicism and it's intellectual tradition that held Truth, Goodness and Beauty in balance. Modern world is essentially the three solas without God behind it. I am self-sufficient. My own mind is enough. My interpretation is supreme. Nietzsche's philosophy most certainly did not improve the lives of people. Nazis were inspired by his vision. His own sister was an incurable antisemite. For a man who raged against pity, Nietzsche fell victim to his own humanity. Nietzsche collapsed in Turin while trying to protect a horse being flogged. 19th, 20th and 21st century is simply a tragic world. Without Magesterium, there is only the morass of conflicting interpretations.
The true superhuman is a saint, transfigured in the image of Christ. Nietzsche wanted a godless, demonic superhuman who can crush the weak under his heels. That has been tried and it has failed. Read the epic of Gilgamesh. In the end, it is pity that saved him.
The professor and teaching assistant for a Nietzsche course in college said Nietzsche does not give a rigorous philosophical justification for his views. So I have the same question your comment starts with. Given his views that there are not objective truths, it seems like that would be consistent, but doesn’t answer the question. I guess since we have to make decisions (even if it’s to do nothing) attempt to do what we each think is best?
@@lonelycubicle: It is utterly arbitrary though, isn't it? What does "best" stand for in your sentence? What we each think is "best"? Based on what? This is the kind of mushy thinking that passes for philosophy these days. There is no good, better, bad and worst without a cogent canon of values to hang these labels on. We can say I travelled a 1000 kilo meters to get here, but this is compared to a single kilo meter, which is itself measured against meter and so on and so forth. So when you say "best", the question is as compared to what? What is the unit of measurement you're using? Yourself? What are you? You'd have to say, I am human. Now, we'd have to ask: What does it mean to be human? Of course, for this we must start with the question of the ideal man, which cannot be answered without accounting for the moral reality of man. We can only quantify and grade quality with a standard, like say 24 karat gold. The ideal man is Christ, saith this Catholic.
@@Ordinary_Catholic
If the world’s best philosophers/thinkers [add whatever groups of people should be included] can not agree on what is the best way to live a life, people have to make decisions and what is left except for each person to attempt to live their life as best they can? That’s all I meant by ‘best’. My main point about Nietzsche is that since he says, “… facts is precisely what there is not, only interpretations” (WP § 481)”, why follow his interpretations/prescriptions?
@@lonelycubicle That is precisely my point. The world's best philosophers cannot agree on anything, let alone morals. That is precisely the value of philosophy. It shows the inadequacy of vacuous ratiocination based on premises that are themselves yet to be demonstrated to be true. Now there are two alternatives. To brute force your way through life, to act as if good and evil does not exist, that objective truth is a lie, and "only interpretations" exist. Or you can go beyond yourself in another way - through faith and revelation. Clearly, you prefer the first. But I have to ask, do you actually live as if there is no objective reality, that there are only interpretations. For me, how we live is the test of our philosophical fidelity.
I don't know where you live, but let's say you're a New Yorker and you get mugged and stabbed in a dingy alleyway, would you still hold to your proposition that there are no moral absolutes? And that the man who stabbed and stole your wallet was simply living his "will to power" in the "best way" he can? Let us raise the stakes even further. Let us say it happens to your mother or your sister or daughter, would you still hold on to your proposition? I'm sure you'll say a distinctly, objectively evil act was committed, and I pray to God you never have to come to this point in life. But I have made my point.
Men like Nietzsche at long last were never willing to put their money where their mouths are. And those who did wreaked extraordinary destruction upon humanity. And you think the saints of the Catholic Church were some spineless men who dared not go where Nietzsche went? St Augustine had already seen what Nietzsche saw. He even called named the problem: Libido Dominandi, the Lust to Dominate. You only need to read the City of God.
Bottom line is this: We as humanity have been there, tried that and now have the t-shirt. Nietzsche is dead. I recommend watch Hitchcock's The Rope, a wonderful movie that takes Nietzschean Will to Power to it's logical conclusion.
Nietzsche lacked common experiences that are a basis for much of human society and morality.. of course he was very intelligent and perceptive and his philosophy is very interesting and in many ways enlightening.. however the way he is interpreted leads me to think that he lacked two experiences that are key.. I don't know if he ever really hurt anyone in his life.. I mean hurt them very deeply like breaking the heart of a young girl.. surely he would feel remorse for the pain he caused.. The other experience is that of having children and a family.. this lack of experience surely colors the way that he analyzed life and society.
thats completly true. One of the most wise things to know before reading a philosopher is to realize and to admit that the world the author is producing and judging about is simply his world, build around his experience of life mostly as a (subjective) deduction. Even if some deductions are true objectively, it is always the sum and the point of view that determines how bright the world or life can be. Nietzsche did not seem to have much fullfillment in life in terms of receiving and showing love.
Whats the deal with the misleading camera recording date? Clearly not 1987. Whats the agenda here?
I feel like you totally misinterpreted the concept of ‘superhuman’. At least compared to the way Nietzsche presented it
It’s cha
I’m deeply Christian, but I always thought that _if_ God didn’t exist then Nietzsche would be most correct of the atheistic philosophers that I know of.
Nietzsche doesnt say God doesnt exist, that isnt what God is dead means. He says the full committed believe in God as giver of objective truths and morals is not possible anymore.
@@Brien831 Ok but he also didn’t believe in Christianity and thought it perpetuated Slave Morality. He thought that Christianity subverted the strength-based might-makes-right Master Morality of the ancient world. In his view- now that Christianity had “fallen” it was up to a new generation of Masters to create a new system out of the ashes.
Using AI would disgust Nietchze
Whatever you do: Don't donate to "cancer research", which is just funding torture and propaganda. Rather, support efforts to inform the public of the healing modalities that have proven effective; like clean, low-carb diets and saltwater fasting.
He didnt solve everything, but his reevaluation of all values should be used on him aswell, to really transcend him. Better to find the flaws and individuate yourself then to follow nietzche.
I personally think his focus on "ought" claims, is his biggest mistanke, as If the true individual couldnt find his own path, and has to be told by nietzche how to live.
Individual doesn’t mean simply pernicious and pedantic. I don’t think Nietzsche ever demanded that people follow him religiously , I’m pretty sure this video isn’t advocating it either . Rather that by reading his works one might discern some useful information which hadn’t been previously accessed or perhaps to provide an alternative angle to validate and ratify one’s existing ideas .
There is a false saying, ‘Whoever cannot save himself - how can he save others?’ But if I have the key to your chains, why should your and my lock be the same.”
I’m am quite sure within his works I personally would find more sentences of pertinence and use than in any of the publications which you have written but would be willing to be proven wrong if you are willing to direct me to you most well considered contribution .
Nobody is perfect but we are all perfect imperfections
@@guzgrant Well feel free to tell me how ones supposed to interprate his seemings on "slaves and master morality", "the ubermensch" and "will to power" that doesnt imply any ought claims from his side.
I sometimes wonder what early nietzche would say about his later works.
I personally love his Key and chain analogy, i also use many of his bits of wisdom, but that doesnt mean i have to buy into it all. As for my own ideas, i dont spread them without caution, there is context and a place and time for everything.
Infact one of the biggest ironies in nietzche is he himself being co-opted by the religious, which always makes me laugh, and i cant think of a Better philosopher to be used in that way. His ideas on suffering in perticular.
His reevaluation of all values is the only ought claim i actually follow, as that allows me to use it on him aswell, as for the rest, im perfectly able to find out how one ought to act on my own, thats the whole point of being an individual as i see it
@@DeadEndFrog I mean for Nietzsche was Austrian for one thing so the literal dissection of language would be best forgiven as generic imperfect parallels and considered as part of widoer context and the point being illustrated and less so dwelled upon and scrutinised as a claimed or intended individual semantic truth ..
@@guzgrant sure, but whats the problem then?
Lmao, why would you think Nietzsche wants to show a path? A major point of Thus Spoke Zarathustra is, that there are no paths and your’ and Zarathustra’s disappear right behind the, You fundamentally misunderstood him, if you think he gives any advice on what you ought to do and how to live.
Is the length of the video on purpose? 11:11
Altogether a good video, but I feel like you’re trying too hard to house Nietzsche within traditional morals. You make him out to be just another preacher of virtue and altruism; in reality, he was fundamentally opposed to such ideas.
Video is pretty good and insightful. But the voiceover is a bit sloppy 😮
at 5:23 Socrates has 6 fingers in his right hand
how to get this haircut ?
I thought this was a peterson video.
Nietzsch-ay??? Just coming up with creative ways to mispronounce his name now
Are you the artist of these panels ?
Everyone who denies God lives a depressive sad life.
706 views? Is this a reupload or something?
Well he definitely didn't solve everything and he has to give credit to Hinduism for where he got many of his ideas. We can move forward as a species if we stop idolizing flawed human beings
Who’s art is this
are those images ai generated?