Here's why this doesn't work for a number of reasons. 1.1. Windows NT 3.1 is 32-bit, it does not have a 64-bit version 1.2. Windows 11 is 64-bit, it does not have a 32-bit version 2.1. Windows NT 3.1 did not have NTFS implemented, it uses FAT instead 2.2. Windows 11 came LONG after the deprecation of FAT in Windows Vista 3. Windows NT 3.1 was released before UEFI was even a thing afaik, but Windows 11 requires it for the drive As such, these versions are mutually exclusive and cannot be dual-booted on the same drive.
1. I knew this barrier was a thing before my experiment even happened (even my friend said so) and yes, this is one of the reasons why it wasn't so clear to me whether or not if both could still dual boot (I also forgot to explain that I had to switch on VMs) because it automatically boots to BOOTMGR (which is obviously 64 bits on W11) 2. Windows NT 3.1 DID support NTFS, you can even see it on the video right here: 3:15 3. Also explained in the video: I didn't realize this during my experiment but when I did, I had 2 options: 1. Use a W10/11 hard drive to convert the drive from MBR to GPT or 2. Bypass W11's check from Legacy, I chose 2nd since it was less time consuming
You made me think there was a notification received at my computer lol
Here's why this doesn't work for a number of reasons.
1.1. Windows NT 3.1 is 32-bit, it does not have a 64-bit version
1.2. Windows 11 is 64-bit, it does not have a 32-bit version
2.1. Windows NT 3.1 did not have NTFS implemented, it uses FAT instead
2.2. Windows 11 came LONG after the deprecation of FAT in Windows Vista
3. Windows NT 3.1 was released before UEFI was even a thing afaik, but Windows 11 requires it for the drive
As such, these versions are mutually exclusive and cannot be dual-booted on the same drive.
You can bypass UEFI and install it on BIOS using registry editor
NT 3.1 did have NTFS. It's called *NT* FS for a reason
It did have NTFS but maybe the version difference is a problem?
1. I knew this barrier was a thing before my experiment even happened (even my friend said so) and yes, this is one of the reasons why it wasn't so clear to me whether or not if both could still dual boot (I also forgot to explain that I had to switch on VMs) because it automatically boots to BOOTMGR (which is obviously 64 bits on W11)
2. Windows NT 3.1 DID support NTFS, you can even see it on the video right here: 3:15
3. Also explained in the video: I didn't realize this during my experiment but when I did, I had 2 options: 1. Use a W10/11 hard drive to convert the drive from MBR to GPT or 2. Bypass W11's check from Legacy, I chose 2nd since it was less time consuming
I got you to 90 subs yo
You have 69 subs at this moment im typing this
LOL
Now 90
96 now
301 now (big jump from last reply fr)
I found a copy of Microsoft's last stable and trusted OS, DOS 6.2
5:16 the hand looks so weird like who touches their keyboard like that
the keyboard groomer
I just subbed
You couldve added music but otherwise a cool experiment, and also some commentary.
Tf is that static
U had 280 subs now u have 281
🗣️🔥🔥🔥 I subbed
Use Rufus to make a windows 11 install that doesn't have TPM etc requirements
This was one of the original plans, I could've used a USB and make the VM boot into it but I had no spare USB drives so I had to stick to another plan
fucken disk ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤