Situation based questions for PMP® Exam | Episode 6 | Process Groups practice question for PMP® Exam
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ส.ค. 2024
- In this 6th episode of live discussions of PMP exam questions, we have selected 5 questions from 5 process groups to prepare you for your upcoming PMP certification exam.
The questions are very close to the actual exam and in the video, we have discussed many tips and tricks that will prepare you for many such questions.
00:00 Quick Introduction to Process groups
01:43 Question 1: Initiation
14:08 Question 2: Planning
23:31 Question 3: Execution
27:13 Question 4: Monitoring & Controlling
33:50 Question 5: Closing
All the questions are discussed with detailed explanations for exam tips and tricks, along with the strategy of how to solve such questions in the exam.
____________
Take mock exam simulators to test your preparation with exam-like questions: exams.edzest.org
Not sure how and where to start your PMP® preparation, talk to us at
Phone/WhatsApp/Telegram: +91 9673332684
Mail: contact@edzest.org
Great session with great explanation
Thank you so much 😊🙏
👍
Thank you!
In Question - 2 if we use the Bottom Up Estimation...it will brings more precise estimates as compared to Analogous...which leads in proper realistic selection of developers and problem will be solved....
Your statement is correct in general, but in this specific question, it's not established that the problem is with estimation. And it's also not clear whether WBS was created, which is required for bottom up estimation.
I Have same question as kirtimarwah2002 i believe second question answer should be D instead of A.
Hi, charging the estimation technique wouldn't prevent the problem. Since, on Agile/Scrum, you'd not create a WBS, hence bottom up estimation might not be possible.
Very nice .thank you very much
You're welcome Vikas. 😀
And C video conference
👍
Ans
. A
👍
C
👍
Hi. I have a question regarding the question that had estimation techniques as one of the option(last option). The question clearly states that estimation was done based on previous similar projects so clearly it is analogous techniques. Bottom up would have been more accurate. But you mentioned that the correct answer is doing both the projects sequentially. In a normal scenario, it’s difficult to wait for one project to finish so your project can be started. So why was the bottom
Up estimation option not the correct answer?
Hi, the question asks what could have been done differently to avoid the problem faced. The problem was not with estimates but because the team was doing multi-tasking.
Hence, changing the estimate wouldn't have worked.
I agree with what you're saying regarding practical difficulties in doing in sequence, but the question is asking, what could have been done differently. So while planning we could have planned for prioritising a project over the other.
@@edzest I think the problem is with estimate only not recourse sharing .. because during planning itself we know that the recourses will be shared hence we took 5 developers. If we follow bottom up estimate we could have estimated the correct recourses.
Ans C optimize the resources as budget is also tight
👍