This is something I've worked through in my Career. I am a Male Ballet Dancer by Profession, as well as a Dance Instructor. As you would expect, the majority of the time I'm Teaching young girls and women. When I first begin Teaching I would recieve blow back from the Older Senior Girls. Looking back, I was coming at it with the Male Bravado that my Male Teachers would use to teach me. I've since found that it does take a certain balance of energies. Seeing the Human who is Dancing, working through the problems, and growing alongside the Dancer they are working to become. My parents split when I was 12, the year before I started dancing. I had the thought recently, Since I was lacking in proper Masculine influence. How did I develop this sense of Balance around myself that I have . . . Because in my career, I was blessed with hundreds of daughters. 😅 I never expected this life in living, But I damn sure am grateful for it, and it's lessons.
Maybe am delusional, or I've been terribly tricked. But Simon is just super easy to understand and listen to. Amazing human being, one of my favorites!
I’m a massive fan of Simon normally but I’m disappointed at how the actual question was swerved here. It may have been unintentional, but it further proves the struggle that masculinity faces in the modern world.
Simon is just using caution to dodge the keyboard worriers. A lot of people fail to see the context in which someone speaks these days. Words are only inflammatory if you are easily triggered. I observe plenty of that from youth. Good news is Millennials have aged and matured a bit so we don't hear to many complaints about them anymore. Lets see what the newer generation brings about in society.
So what he’s saying is we’re all having problems but we can solve it by being more like women because that works best with his thought process. He never addressed making sense out of male logic at all for men but rather the pure feminine aspect of the dynamic. Now risk rejection is a positive aspect of male learning that women can learn. What if they do? What would be the point of us needing one another if we are learning how to become one another? These things can help them in job growth but what about finding men in the current climate where they have an advantage? The question is whether we’d be needed if we take on too much femininity and women too much masculinity. Note: before I anyone asks, I already know the lady falling into her feminine made the people like her more. Different genders respond to behaviors in a more traditional way. What I find odd is that rarely are these guests ever truly pressed on their logic.
Polarity must exist to create attraction between masculine and feminine. It is such a simple concept, yet I never hear it addressed as to why men and women seem to be at war. Women have masculinized and the answer is not for men to feminize. Masculine women are tyrants and encouraging their behavior is just leading us further toward societal collapse all while gaslighting men to be more vulnerable (feminine) and it'll fix everything.
It was circuitose but he got there.. trying to 'solve' depression by thinking hard about it leads us to pick up a gun, how you actually solve depression is by connecting to people and meaning, living - that's the point of the story.
@@Hesnotoneofus I think youre half way there. What your getting at is that modern therapeutic methods are built for women and not men. Men do not need to think and express more, as you said that leads to violent action potentially. Men need a solution to the problem and a direction. Men need purpose and that purpose can be solving our own issues if there is a method to do so. Unfortunately we dont talk about and solve men's problems in our culture so instead we will gaslight men as they continue to kill themselves and others because there are no genuine solutions or acknowledgement to the problems of these hopeless men.
In my experience (as Simon says) In the workplace, female leadership is wiser if you lead experience people. Otherwise they will challenge you. It s the same in life as we get older. But I think when you lead a very junior, they admire you, everything you say, they want male leadership to get to the right path. This is what it is about.
I used to train people ..I was shocked on the pressure men put on themselves ..they are internally stressed out.. but the facial expression is neutral ..but women ..I could often tell by observing that they were stressed out ..men in my opinion is not getting the nurturing as from past generations..some women are like.. suck it up ..some women are not nice to men..some men need to feel it is ok to express their emotions ..some men cant vent..they snap..some women need to nurture their man..to realize that he has feelings ..some men are obsessed with their grandma or mom..leaving out their wife..she isnt nurturing him..he is leaving her ..with all the chores .its just a lose lose situation..neither person is getting what they really need from the other person ..we are in a constant loop if critizing each other ..instead of accepting our differences ..men and women need to work together on their problems initially ..then ask for help ..be a united front ..there is too much emotional backstabbing..we are just stressing one another out ..I feel it is because people forgot that we are different..figure out what you can each do ..what you can work on together ..to be there for each other ..to have sympathy for one anothers trials..to do things to destress. I feel that people nowadays feel guilty relaxing or taking a nap .its taboo .but your body needs rest..people arent giving each other nap breaks anymore..people are afraid to ask for help..
I understood it perfectly. Many people have so much inculcated hate for anything considered feminine, it makes them stubbornly oblivious to what is required of them in relationships and in leadership positions, i.e. empathy, care, patience. Men and women both. Men and women are both taught that those things indicate weakness when the opposite is true.
Simon approaches this question from a feminist viewpoint which is men should act more like women. He probably didn’t intend this but he’s contributing to the de masculinization of men which has negative generational consequences that we’re already seeing.
@@ehuremovic526 In case you didn't catch it, he pointed out differences between male/female leadership, even going to talk about male/female traits, and eventually saying that a good leader has a balance of both. Women were on a pedestal the entire time he spoke. This is practically the modern feminist argument in terms of how male should behave; men should be more like women.
@@fuyooooo I don't agree with your pedestal comment and I don't agree with the modern feminist argument because it's way too general. The way I see it an individual can acquire skills to accomplish things.
go ahead and be miserable then. because seriously, if you can't comprehend that patience, care and empathy are essential skills for effective leadership, let alone any other human relationship (because you're that triggered by anything remotely associated with femininity) then your misery (and the misery of everyone you love) is guaranteed.
Andrew turd thinks being a man means women need to be subservient to make him feel special- a man that relies on others including women to take care of him is no man
So let me get this right….. the solution is that the men need more honesty, more empathy, more understanding. Did I get that right? As a man I would like to apologise and will try my best to be more honest, have more empathy and be more understanding. Gtfoh.
Tate is right. His bombastic approach gets notice because he refuses to be governed by the tone police. The old IT'S NOT WHAT YOU SAY BUT HOW YOU SAY IT trope is tired and useless. Whether the information is delivered with sugar cubes in your mouth or with fire breathing crassness, those who will not heed will not heed. Team Tate over this way. He's unapologetic because apology is unnecessary.
Civil rights didn’t hurt white people. The legislation of gay marriage didn’t hurt heteronormative marriages. Pointing out the struggles of young men shouldn’t and won’t hurt women.
Consider a scenario: a mixed gender group get lost hiking in a forest. It is an emergency situation which will require someone to assume leadership. Assuming similar relevant knowledge, if all the men in that group anxiously cower in that situation in a way which forces one of the women to take that leadership......how do those women now instinctively regard those men? Would any of those women be likely to see those men as potential partners? Women have a deep need for men to be willing and able to take leadership and make sure they are safe in situations when it really matters. This does not imply any sense of ownership or lack of freedom. It also doesn't mean placing anyone's preferences above anyone else's. Its just a matter of the roles we play and which ones are harmonious with our fundamental nature. Our culture desperately needs to stop denying fundamental realities like this. It is making us all sick.
So weird you'd use that example. I watched a story the other day about a group of 14 year old girls on a 3-day hiking excursion whose adult male guides got them lost in the remote woods on day two. So - many miles into their journey. After several hours of the men leading them deeper into the mess, the girls took charge and got them out of the mess. And here is yet another man failing to take into consideration that men aren't always the most logical or capable ones in the group. It's that failure to see or acknowledge that he needs to take a different role - is precisely what makes a man unfuckable.
Fuckable is the man who recognizes whose expertise and instinct is superior in a situation and takes a supportive role - without ego, or whining about masculinity, or pissing contests.
@@themuse11 I'm thrown off by men leading a group of 14 year old girls. Under what circumstances were these? I bet those men underestimated the intelligence of those girls. Which happens often.
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
This is something I've worked through in my Career.
I am a Male Ballet Dancer by Profession, as well as a Dance Instructor. As you would expect, the majority of the time I'm Teaching young girls and women.
When I first begin Teaching I would recieve blow back from the Older Senior Girls.
Looking back, I was coming at it with the Male Bravado that my Male Teachers would use to teach me.
I've since found that it does take a certain balance of energies.
Seeing the Human who is Dancing, working through the problems, and growing alongside the Dancer they are working to become.
My parents split when I was 12, the year before I started dancing.
I had the thought recently,
Since I was lacking in proper Masculine influence. How did I develop this sense of Balance around myself that I have . . .
Because in my career, I was blessed with hundreds of daughters. 😅
I never expected this life in living,
But I damn sure am grateful for it, and it's lessons.
❤
Maybe am delusional, or I've been terribly tricked. But Simon is just super easy to understand and listen to. Amazing human being, one of my favorites!
Listen well.....And you may become a Simpmaster.
Thx for advice man@@9avedon
I’m a massive fan of Simon normally but I’m disappointed at how the actual question was swerved here. It may have been unintentional, but it further proves the struggle that masculinity faces in the modern world.
Woke simping ruined the military.
Masculinity has always struggled, that’s what it entails.
@@zerowheeler What he means the normal struggle, its the struggle that is put by intention in the way of men.
Simon is just using caution to dodge the keyboard worriers. A lot of people fail to see the context in which someone speaks these days. Words are only inflammatory if you are easily triggered. I observe plenty of that from youth. Good news is Millennials have aged and matured a bit so we don't hear to many complaints about them anymore. Lets see what the newer generation brings about in society.
I love the host he seems such a great guy
It's not about male or female leadership but about yin-yang, to embrace both sides of ourselves
So what he’s saying is we’re all having problems but we can solve it by being more like women because that works best with his thought process. He never addressed making sense out of male logic at all for men but rather the pure feminine aspect of the dynamic. Now risk rejection is a positive aspect of male learning that women can learn. What if they do? What would be the point of us needing one another if we are learning how to become one another? These things can help them in job growth but what about finding men in the current climate where they have an advantage?
The question is whether we’d be needed if we take on too much femininity and women too much masculinity.
Note: before I anyone asks, I already know the lady falling into her feminine made the people like her more. Different genders respond to behaviors in a more traditional way.
What I find odd is that rarely are these guests ever truly pressed on their logic.
Polarity must exist to create attraction between masculine and feminine. It is such a simple concept, yet I never hear it addressed as to why men and women seem to be at war. Women have masculinized and the answer is not for men to feminize. Masculine women are tyrants and encouraging their behavior is just leading us further toward societal collapse all while gaslighting men to be more vulnerable (feminine) and it'll fix everything.
It was circuitose but he got there.. trying to 'solve' depression by thinking hard about it leads us to pick up a gun, how you actually solve depression is by connecting to people and meaning, living - that's the point of the story.
@@Hesnotoneofus I think youre half way there. What your getting at is that modern therapeutic methods are built for women and not men. Men do not need to think and express more, as you said that leads to violent action potentially. Men need a solution to the problem and a direction. Men need purpose and that purpose can be solving our own issues if there is a method to do so. Unfortunately we dont talk about and solve men's problems in our culture so instead we will gaslight men as they continue to kill themselves and others because there are no genuine solutions or acknowledgement to the problems of these hopeless men.
@healthymindhappierlife5089 As I said - meaning is important, meaning is achieved through purpose.
Beautiful story, raw truth about an experience that if we see it, we can grow from it.
In my experience (as Simon says) In the workplace, female leadership is wiser if you lead experience people. Otherwise they will challenge you. It s the same in life as we get older.
But I think when you lead a very junior, they admire you, everything you say, they want male leadership to get to the right path. This is what it is about.
Let’s talk about men’s issues. Ok, there’s this woman in the military…..🤦♂️
He wanted to tell that story so bad he was looking for any opening
Beautifully said Simon 🙏🏼
That third squeeze was like a geyser, I'm in ❤ with this reel!
I used to train people ..I was shocked on the pressure men put on themselves ..they are internally stressed out.. but the facial expression is neutral ..but women ..I could often tell by observing that they were stressed out ..men in my opinion is not getting the nurturing as from past generations..some women are like.. suck it up ..some women are not nice to men..some men need to feel it is ok to express their emotions ..some men cant vent..they snap..some women need to nurture their man..to realize that he has feelings ..some men are obsessed with their grandma or mom..leaving out their wife..she isnt nurturing him..he is leaving her ..with all the chores .its just a lose lose situation..neither person is getting what they really need from the other person ..we are in a constant loop if critizing each other ..instead of accepting our differences ..men and women need to work together on their problems initially ..then ask for help ..be a united front ..there is too much emotional backstabbing..we are just stressing one another out ..I feel it is because people forgot that we are different..figure out what you can each do ..what you can work on together ..to be there for each other ..to have sympathy for one anothers trials..to do things to destress. I feel that people nowadays feel guilty relaxing or taking a nap .its taboo .but your body needs rest..people arent giving each other nap breaks anymore..people are afraid to ask for help..
Sorry but if "my team" is making me fail, the team HAS TO GO!!
We need human leadership to become a regular experience.... for every human.
Great interview.
Simon Sinek is da GOAT
Let’s talk about men’s issues. Ok, women make better leaders and men need to be more like women.
I understood it perfectly. Many people have so much inculcated hate for anything considered feminine, it makes them stubbornly oblivious to what is required of them in relationships and in leadership positions, i.e. empathy, care, patience. Men and women both. Men and women are both taught that those things indicate weakness when the opposite is true.
Sorry, as a woman, I like some of the stuff Andrew Tate says. Women trying to be equal to men has absolutely not helped either gender.
Found the Pickme.
What a relief he doesn’t know about the tates. It feels hopeful.
he's lying
💯 @@grademployment
It’s as much about the people you’re leading as the leader itself. One type of leader doesn’t fit all no matter the gender.
Either I hang around in the darker section of the internet or I'm hallucinating and this is not real.
Simon approaches this question from a feminist viewpoint which is men should act more like women. He probably didn’t intend this but he’s contributing to the de masculinization of men which has negative generational consequences that we’re already seeing.
Disagree. He's saying all leaders need to be empathetic and patient, irrespective of gender because these are "human skills".
@@ehuremovic526 In case you didn't catch it, he pointed out differences between male/female leadership, even going to talk about male/female traits, and eventually saying that a good leader has a balance of both. Women were on a pedestal the entire time he spoke. This is practically the modern feminist argument in terms of how male should behave; men should be more like women.
@@fuyooooo I don't agree with your pedestal comment and I don't agree with the modern feminist argument because it's way too general. The way I see it an individual can acquire skills to accomplish things.
go ahead and be miserable then. because seriously, if you can't comprehend that patience, care and empathy are essential skills for effective leadership, let alone any other human relationship (because you're that triggered by anything remotely associated with femininity) then your misery (and the misery of everyone you love) is guaranteed.
Invite Andrew Tate On The Podcast.
Andrew Tate isnt Anti Women, he is Pro Men - this isn’t a competition
Andrew tate is pro money. Men like Jordan Peterson are pro men
Andrew turd thinks being a man means women need to be subservient to make him feel special- a man that relies on others including women to take care of him is no man
So let me get this right….. the solution is that the men need more honesty, more empathy, more understanding. Did I get that right? As a man I would like to apologise and will try my best to be more honest, have more empathy and be more understanding.
Gtfoh.
I didn't like Simon and this is why !
So you're saying empathy and patience is a bad thing?
@@ehuremovic526 maybe you misread my reply. That’s not what i said at all. Read it again.
@@shanghaiffgg you ended your comment with 'Gtfoh' and to me that expresses disbelief. Do you mind explaining why you would use that?
@@ehuremovic526 because his answer was evasive and ridiculous in equal parts
Tate is right. His bombastic approach gets notice because he refuses to be governed by the tone police. The old IT'S NOT WHAT YOU SAY BUT HOW YOU SAY IT trope is tired and useless. Whether the information is delivered with sugar cubes in your mouth or with fire breathing crassness, those who will not heed will not heed. Team Tate over this way. He's unapologetic because apology is unnecessary.
Don't think he answered the question...
Civil rights didn’t hurt white people. The legislation of gay marriage didn’t hurt heteronormative marriages. Pointing out the struggles of young men shouldn’t and won’t hurt women.
bro talk about Andrew Tate so much BUT inviting him on.
invite him on or are you scared of people ganging on you lol
I do not resonate with this humans thoughts. Maybe he should study and speak about astrology & numerology. I don't know much about these subjects.
He’s wrong.
Consider a scenario: a mixed gender group get lost hiking in a forest. It is an emergency situation which will require someone to assume leadership. Assuming similar relevant knowledge, if all the men in that group anxiously cower in that situation in a way which forces one of the women to take that leadership......how do those women now instinctively regard those men? Would any of those women be likely to see those men as potential partners?
Women have a deep need for men to be willing and able to take leadership and make sure they are safe in situations when it really matters. This does not imply any sense of ownership or lack of freedom. It also doesn't mean placing anyone's preferences above anyone else's. Its just a matter of the roles we play and which ones are harmonious with our fundamental nature. Our culture desperately needs to stop denying fundamental realities like this. It is making us all sick.
So weird you'd use that example. I watched a story the other day about a group of 14 year old girls on a 3-day hiking excursion whose adult male guides got them lost in the remote woods on day two. So - many miles into their journey. After several hours of the men leading them deeper into the mess, the girls took charge and got them out of the mess.
And here is yet another man failing to take into consideration that men aren't always the most logical or capable ones in the group. It's that failure to see or acknowledge that he needs to take a different role - is precisely what makes a man unfuckable.
Fuckable is the man who recognizes whose expertise and instinct is superior in a situation and takes a supportive role - without ego, or whining about masculinity, or pissing contests.
@@themuse11 I'm thrown off by men leading a group of 14 year old girls. Under what circumstances were these? I bet those men underestimated the intelligence of those girls. Which happens often.
Huh. Being human and not a hard ass works after all. Whowouldathunk?
comment
Attention sells.
What?... He didn't answer/address the question at all. Just had a casual chat about some tangentially related matter.