EdgePerformance EP917Ti Engine Update (180 HP!!)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @JH-tk6oi
    @JH-tk6oi ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Ya'll are brilliant. Made a beautiful engine even prettier.

  • @ITSFUNZ
    @ITSFUNZ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sweet looking setup !!!

  • @wallywally8282
    @wallywally8282 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Crazy power from a 1.2+ Litre engine!

  • @zonealgo
    @zonealgo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would love this engine in a KFA Safari XL build I am thinking about starting in early 2024!
    I'm looking for 160 Hp to 180 Hp with turbo and lighter installed engine weight that other options.

  • @ITSFUNZ
    @ITSFUNZ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome setup !

  • @lipo9499
    @lipo9499 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am very interested in putting this in a rv-7

  • @jasonknight149
    @jasonknight149 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Have you done anything new with the gearbox to accommodate the higher power?

  • @willcall9431
    @willcall9431 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice build. Brilliant on the position sensor off the pump. So what is the Price point and lead time?

    • @EdgePerformanceNorway
      @EdgePerformanceNorway  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you. You can see engine pricing here. Lead time currently 6-8 weeks.
      shop.edgeperformance.no/butikk/aviation-engines/ep-boxer-motorer

  • @Captndarty
    @Captndarty ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very informative. Thank you. What’s the turbos critical altitude and max continuous?

    • @EdgePerformanceNorway
      @EdgePerformanceNorway  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      24.000’
      shop.edgeperformance.no/produkt/aviation-engines/ep-boxer-motorer/ep917ti-180hp-turbo-efi-fadec

    • @Captndarty
      @Captndarty ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@EdgePerformanceNorway your website says the critical altitude is 15,000 not 24,000 and there’s nothing about max continuous horsepower…

    • @flexairz
      @flexairz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Captndarty It says:
      Maximum operating altitude 23,000 feet
      and:
      Power output: 160HP (118Kw)/180HP (133Kw) 224Nm (113ft/lb) @ 5800rpm
      So I expect max continuous to be 160 hp

    • @Captndarty
      @Captndarty ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@flexairz I know what the maximum operating altitude is I never ask that. I asked the critical altitude where the turbo makes the most power. He has two versions a 160 hp and the 180 hp models. Neither show the maximum continuous.

    • @OneAlphaMike
      @OneAlphaMike ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Captndarty I have the same questions. Also wonder what the HP is a Max ECO power.

  • @hellycopulaucity4347
    @hellycopulaucity4347 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Berapa harga di sana?? Ai in indonesia

  • @daivietnguyen7289
    @daivietnguyen7289 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just wandering if this new EP917 Ti is going to fit in the Shark aero ???

  • @djal1030
    @djal1030 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How$? Whas the TBO? Weight? 180hp for how long?

    • @EdgePerformanceNorway
      @EdgePerformanceNorway  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      shop.edgeperformance.no/produkt/aviation-engines/ep-boxer-motorer/ep917ti-180hp-turbo-efi-fadec

    • @TSLApilot
      @TSLApilot 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So that’s 180 hp for take off and 160 max continuous hp?

    • @Captndarty
      @Captndarty 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TSLApilothe sucks at explaining and answering direct simple questions

  • @percussion44
    @percussion44 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MTBF 50 hours

  • @DanFrederiksen
    @DanFrederiksen ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Instead of forever being reliant on difficult expensive hacks of already overpriced rotax engines you really really should make a turbofan jet engine from scratch instead. scaled down version of Williams FJ33 is a simple approach, it's actually a much simpler engine than a piston engine, much cheaper to make and for the ~600kg MTOW category it would only have to be around 15kg. So very small, very light, simple device, with natural twin engine redundancy, jet speeds, high altitude performance and fuel efficiency comparable to good pistons. World long distance record of 40000km without refueling belongs to Williams FJ44 turbofan engine so shake off any idea of jets having inherent bad fuel economy. Think about it.