Molecular Orbitals in Coordination Complexes - Using ORCA in Inorganic Chemistry (Part One)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @alpz8434
    @alpz8434 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These videos are amazing! I am a second year chem student doing some research in inorganic chem and this is just the kind of thing I can work on while out of the lab! Thanks so much and keep up the great work!

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to be helpful! I'd recommend looking to see if your organisation has access to a supercomputer if you want to do lots of calculations - it'll make it much easier!

  • @ahmedel-morsy3883
    @ahmedel-morsy3883 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video! Keep up the great work!

  • @HCAcademy
    @HCAcademy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video, excellent contribution.

  • @kyriakosfan8949
    @kyriakosfan8949 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi,
    how come that the resulting eg orbitals level not only has the 2 (dz^2 and dx^2-y^2) orbitals, but also has that third one at -7,8 eV?

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That extra orbital is the ligand non-bonding orbital!

    • @kyriakosfan8949
      @kyriakosfan8949 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DrBenChem okay, thank you. Nice video

  • @rasakundu83
    @rasakundu83 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super

  • @juancarlosdominguezsolis.4665
    @juancarlosdominguezsolis.4665 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    which funcional recomends for carbon nanotubes finished in gold ? thanks for the video

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi! For macromolecular systems like carbon nanotubes, I suspect you'll need to use a different program - the huge number of electrons will mean that the calculation will run incredibly slowly, likely for many months even on a dedicated computational server.
      What do you mean by 'finished in gold'?

  • @gio1470
    @gio1470 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I'm using a mac so I'm not sure if you can help me. After using the "orca" comand followed by [filename].inp>[filename].out in the comand line in the correct directory I'm greeted with the message :
    [file orca_main/maininp1.cpp, line 15105]: ERROR: expect a '$', '!', '%', '*' or '[' in the input
    even though I didn't forget to put asterisks and exclamation marks in the correct places within the input file.
    Do you have any advice on how to fix this issue?

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Have you tried downloading the .inp file from the GitHub directory and running that to make sure your file is formatted correctly?

    • @gio1470
      @gio1470 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DrBenChem Yeah, it was a format issue: the file has to be written in plain text.
      Thanks

  • @setyantotriwahyudi4322
    @setyantotriwahyudi4322 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing. Great...

  • @zulqarnainchaughtai
    @zulqarnainchaughtai 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you please explain the orbital having energy -7.8 eV? I mean how we get six MO's from five AO's?

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There are a lot more than 5 AOs going in - remember, there are the molecular orbitals from the ligands, too.

  • @srremus9781
    @srremus9781 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey if I try to plot my gbw file orca gives out:
    Your bgwfile is either corrupted or from a different orca version! Please be very careful with your calculation results!!
    Data_size, sizeof( Torcainfo): 503600, 49704
    Do you know how to fix this error? I should have the correct version orca 4.2.1 and all my calculations are normally working. So I don't know why it doesn't start

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi! Not entirely sure what to suggest - have you tried fully uninstalling ORCA and replacing it with the newest version?

  • @amyprostmusic9646
    @amyprostmusic9646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could these energies be used to calculate the band gap?

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      To calculate the Band Gap of a material you would need to simulate a much larger structure - I do not think DFT with ORCA is appropriate, maybe VASP might be capable?

    • @tulenik71
      @tulenik71 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      or nwchem and plane waves... but they are quite expensive (approx. 10x longer than single molecule in vacuo with the same functional)

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn't the total charge in the input file be 3 instead of 2?

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only if we were looking at Vanadium III!

    •  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DrBenChem Ok. I've started the calculation now, let's see if I defeat your 4:37 time! I'd like to calculate for 3+ as well; do I use the same multiplicity in the input file?

    • @DrBenChem
      @DrBenChem  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ for 3+ you'll only have 2 unpaired electrons, so the multiplicity will be 3, not 4.