Have you ever seen an atom?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Scientists at the University of California Los Angeles have found a way to create stunningly detailed 3D reconstructing of platinum nanoparticles at an atomic scale. These are being used to study tiny structural irregularities called dislocations.
    Read the paper here: dx.doi.org/10.1...
    Sign up for the Nature Briefing: An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, free in your inbox every weekday. go.nature.com/...

ความคิดเห็น • 17K

  • @jorgepadua9124
    @jorgepadua9124 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20725

    We're a bunch of atoms watching a bunch of atoms on a bunch of atoms.

    • @tomtom9509
      @tomtom9509 8 ปีที่แล้ว +643

      To say nothing of the quarks, leptons and bosons...

    • @TheMakyato
      @TheMakyato 8 ปีที่แล้ว +326

      oh the hp laptops

    • @christiandavidxx
      @christiandavidxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +231

      i'm just an immortal watching a bunch of mortals think about moral things, confused at why they can't reach immortality.

    • @nonconvexgreatrhombicosido9435
      @nonconvexgreatrhombicosido9435 8 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      +Christ David Lol you're not immortal. Also Stop deleting my comments. Why are you so offended?

    • @mattoe1
      @mattoe1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      lol how can he delete your comments

  • @user-wh9mr9tb7q
    @user-wh9mr9tb7q 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7742

    Thought this was some kind of bleeding edge nano tech, then realized this video was posted 8 years ago. mad respect to all the scientists out there

    • @GGsquared
      @GGsquared 2 ปีที่แล้ว +317

      @Hidden Aspects “Source(s): Dude trust me”

    • @SpikeyBagel
      @SpikeyBagel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +200

      @@GGsquared Source(s): bro you gotta believe me

    • @Pradapussy
      @Pradapussy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +182

      @Hidden Aspects have you seen the videos inside of your body or the food you eat 🤯🤯crazy molecular structures bro

    • @RocketTurret
      @RocketTurret 2 ปีที่แล้ว +106

      @Hidden Aspects bro literally everything to ever exist is made of crazy nano-particles and structures.

    • @SpikeyBagel
      @SpikeyBagel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +107

      @@Pradapussy like bro, why are there rectangles in my onion? that must be the work of the government. nature doesn't make rectangles, bro.

  • @galadirk7843
    @galadirk7843 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22423

    My atoms watching this: "Hey there bros"

    • @paramueswaran8015
      @paramueswaran8015 3 ปีที่แล้ว +249

      Underrated

    • @jemonsue1608
      @jemonsue1608 3 ปีที่แล้ว +657

      My atoms be educated.

    • @barium_67
      @barium_67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +206

      @@paramueswaran8015 it's been only 3 days and you're like "uNdErAtEd" wait for a while breh

    • @paramueswaran8015
      @paramueswaran8015 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      @@barium_67 wAiTiNg

    • @barium_67
      @barium_67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@paramueswaran8015 🤬

  • @louiswhite6749
    @louiswhite6749 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1486

    I’m watching this 8 years later and imagining how good microscopes are now

  • @stockwatsonnu8518
    @stockwatsonnu8518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5052

    “Have you ever seen an atom?”
    Yes, I haven’t

    • @DalekCraft
      @DalekCraft 2 ปีที่แล้ว +221

      Somehow, this makes sense.

    • @duwiii420
      @duwiii420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      ....i don't know what to say.

    • @lukaposeidon8490
      @lukaposeidon8490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +111

      Yesn't

    • @unwaving332
      @unwaving332 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      My brain is melting

    • @Gldtr39
      @Gldtr39 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yes I’ve met Adam

  • @hun450
    @hun450 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9793

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    No, but I have drawn them..

    • @musicalhamsa5892
      @musicalhamsa5892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +217

      For science class, i can guess.

    • @infinityxtanishq8712
      @infinityxtanishq8712 3 ปีที่แล้ว +178

      No , you drew an older theoretical model of the atom , not the atom itself ........

    • @Myday_145
      @Myday_145 3 ปีที่แล้ว +228

      No you idiots he means sense everything is made out of atoms,including things you write then yeah he has drawn atoms.He’s drawn atoms by drawing pictures

    • @ananttripathi4264
      @ananttripathi4264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Just like gods lol

    • @AdrianRO1918
      @AdrianRO1918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@Myday_145 no shit sherlock

  • @manababa1313
    @manababa1313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1433

    “Have you seen an atom?” I don’t know maybe I’m made of them.

    • @thetoastcart9360
      @thetoastcart9360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Fax be seeing em everyday

    • @waitwhatihavefriends2181
      @waitwhatihavefriends2181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thetoastcart9360 yeah ikr

    • @ashleywilliams4665
      @ashleywilliams4665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I read the title and said “yes, I’m constantly looking at them… at all times”

    • @simplybxellax
      @simplybxellax 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are made of atoms.

    • @whoami8247
      @whoami8247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thetoastcart9360 you are seeing a massive group of atom and not the atom itself

  • @djmocok
    @djmocok 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1487

    Atom, you see one, you've seen it all

    • @Krazycutiegurlxxx
      @Krazycutiegurlxxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      There's a different atom for each element. Not to mention isotopes. So..... i'd disagree.....unless you were referring to how WE can see them. But even then, i don't know if we can perhaps see a difference in sizes of atoms or something.

    • @kujo62
      @kujo62 8 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Way to ruin the joke by bringing in facts.

    • @Krazycutiegurlxxx
      @Krazycutiegurlxxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      ku62jo62 ...Jokes are supposed to be funny.
      I saw no joke.

    • @kujo62
      @kujo62 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      i did. therefore, it is a joke. and once again, you're ruining everything.

    • @Krazycutiegurlxxx
      @Krazycutiegurlxxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      ku62jo62 You should see a doctor. Your sense of humor seems to be delirious.
      As a professional tomfoolerist with a PhD. in tomfoolery, i suggest 30 minutes of Monty Python.
      Inform me of a recommended way to chop down the largest tree in a forest for your checkup.

  • @elijahhouahri
    @elijahhouahri 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9214

    Atom one: I lost an electron.
    Atom 2: are u sure?
    Atom one: I'm positive

  • @MentalParadox
    @MentalParadox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3063

    "So it's all pixels"?
    Agent Smith: "Always has been."

    • @GfaiderKseii
      @GfaiderKseii 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      *shoot*

    • @kevindavis7603
      @kevindavis7603 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Matrix confirmed...

    • @RSReddit1
      @RSReddit1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@kevindavis7603 😳😳🧐🧐😮😮😭☠️

    • @jamesgoldring1052
      @jamesgoldring1052 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Yeah, these discoveries scare me, pandoras box

    • @wannabekid3256
      @wannabekid3256 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol

  • @BillSmith-rx9rm
    @BillSmith-rx9rm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    It's amazing when you think of the size of the universe and the massive objects contained in it. The galaxy is the planets the Stars, the nebula, and on and on. And yet everything in the entire universe comes down to the microscopic level. That's really what rules the universe. The small things, not the large things. It's amazing to think about.

    • @DerpMuse
      @DerpMuse ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@TomTom-bh2wf yes atoms are comprised of protons/neutrons/electrons. The Electron isnt made of anything, but it communicates information through photons. Protons and Neutrons are comprised of Up/Down Quarks, held together by Gluon field and color charge. The Electroweak force spontaneously release w/z bosons which cause neutrons to become protons, making net charge unbalanced and cause electrons to jump to the atom changing the atomic weight causing the atom to decay over lonnnnng periods of time through a set chain of atomic decay into specific elements due to how the new unstable mass splits into 2 or more new elements with less energy/mass and also some energy released to the aether of space as light or entropy increasing depending how you look at it.

    • @bluewassabi4279
      @bluewassabi4279 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@DerpMuse thank you justin for sharing an interesting information. I don't know what advances we would have in the next 50 years, going beyond quarks strings, and so on. Our universe is a marvel huh; we are like ants trying to figure out how a diesel combustion engine works. But always feel good to "learn" new things indeed.

    • @vedanshisharma7833
      @vedanshisharma7833 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ComradeChilliBeans exactly

    • @madwhitehare3635
      @madwhitehare3635 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And all from nothing, some say….😉

    • @BillSmith-rx9rm
      @BillSmith-rx9rm ปีที่แล้ว

      @@madwhitehare3635 Yes, entirely by chance. Totally an accident. The odds scientists say are 10 to the 200th power. That's a one with 200 zeros. A number that is bigger than all of the stars in the universe, so they say. But if you believe in the likes of Carl Sagan and his wannabe Tyson, they say with a smirk on their face, entirely by chance.

  • @314159265352
    @314159265352 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9246

    Yes. When trillions of them get together.

    • @ahuman4
      @ahuman4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +125

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    • @votesus9819
      @votesus9819 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Lmao

    • @coolcat-nq4mj
      @coolcat-nq4mj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      @@ahuman4 u said it 1 hour after he posted the comment, it's not the time to say underrated

    • @ahuman4
      @ahuman4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@coolcat-nq4mj ?

    • @coolcat-nq4mj
      @coolcat-nq4mj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@ahuman4 ur previous comment b4 u edited was "underrated comment"

  • @dopedrums
    @dopedrums 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2895

    "have you ever seen an atom?"
    Proceeds to show onion hieroglyphs

    • @ERWlN_SMITH
      @ERWlN_SMITH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      😂😂😂

    • @ryanmotmaen6311
      @ryanmotmaen6311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Actually those are onion's cells

    • @Seffek
      @Seffek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      @@ryanmotmaen6311 Thanks for sharing that information, I did not know this until now.

    • @ERWlN_SMITH
      @ERWlN_SMITH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@ryanmotmaen6311 damn bro really? I never knew 🤯

    • @shadowwolf5128
      @shadowwolf5128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ERWlN_SMITH seeing your profile ye i would say you didn't know

  • @DNV970Raze
    @DNV970Raze 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3305

    -"Have you ever seen an atom?"
    - * proceeds to show an onion *
    -me: that's a strange looking atom

    • @hsnplayz
      @hsnplayz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      me too also thought the same.

    • @WhoThisMonkey
      @WhoThisMonkey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Shrek is like an onion, so atoms are essentially swamp ogres.
      I learned something new today.

    • @sarthakhajirnis1908
      @sarthakhajirnis1908 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Cursed atom

    • @LYCJay
      @LYCJay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Xd

    • @markkjm3333
      @markkjm3333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good afternoon

  • @hamster2845
    @hamster2845 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Trying to view an atom using visible light is like shooting cannonballs off a brick wall to determine its texture.

    • @TRVPHAUS
      @TRVPHAUS 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that doesn't make any sense.

    • @Shadydoesit
      @Shadydoesit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@TRVPHAUSactually it makes complete sense, because to measure something on such a small scale would change its position

    • @fxeditors
      @fxeditors หลายเดือนก่อน

      Uncertainty principle

    • @bookofsounds014
      @bookofsounds014 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      so this suggests the findings only demonstrate light behavior?

  • @paulanocu3711
    @paulanocu3711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +672

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    Shows onion

    • @Thecrusader6169
      @Thecrusader6169 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Fun fact: onion is an atom
      Just kidding 😂

    • @onlyraff7768
      @onlyraff7768 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Thecrusader6169 no but it is fr 😂

    • @Bakibenz96
      @Bakibenz96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's an easter egg for those who know the deep lore :D Bohr's early atom model is frequently compared to an onion.

    • @0djunder0
      @0djunder0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Thecrusader6169 well, yes, is made of *atoms*

    • @Thecrusader6169
      @Thecrusader6169 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@0djunder0 that's what I said

  • @kartikeymehrotra8589
    @kartikeymehrotra8589 2 ปีที่แล้ว +888

    This was 8 years ago, damn, I thought I'm watching some cutting edge engineering in play

    • @lumenpraetorius4592
      @lumenpraetorius4592 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No.

    • @KaarthiBlaze
      @KaarthiBlaze 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Yea... imagine how much tech have progressed now

    • @unskadunsk
      @unskadunsk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Still pretty advanced

    • @indigoisasleep8552
      @indigoisasleep8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, you are

    • @aiduck8307
      @aiduck8307 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@KaarthiBlaze yeah like Facebook is no longer is used and TikTok being a mental asylum. 😂

  • @CanadianPrepper
    @CanadianPrepper 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18316

    Wait until the flat earthers get bored and start a new "Atoms dont exist" campaign...

    • @masterbetty3020
      @masterbetty3020 5 ปีที่แล้ว +155

      @@lukewave7680 You heard correct!

    • @JS-qg1ie
      @JS-qg1ie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2113

      What’s the difference between a knife and a flat earther?
      A knife has a point.

    • @osslayer8976
      @osslayer8976 5 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      James Stimpson oof flat earthers

    • @Smullet90
      @Smullet90 5 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      @@JS-qg1ie
      That's *A* difference not *THE* difference.

    • @JS-qg1ie
      @JS-qg1ie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +127

      Smullet90 First time hearing a joke?

  • @alexpetrov8871
    @alexpetrov8871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    These tiny dots - atoms, they are actually made of emptiness. What you see as a dot - is an area where electrons orbit over nucleus, where nucleus in turn is several hundred times smaller than the maximum orbit. There is no "matter" at all - only energy fields.

    • @sunimarai8380
      @sunimarai8380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can u explain it

    • @619kane
      @619kane 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      GOD PARTICAL

    • @scruffypupper
      @scruffypupper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      But if enough of the atoms hang out together they make up some kind of matter (onion) right? So if the atoms are empty and the emptiness contained by an energy field how can the onion exist so that we see it? Are we/everything just an energy field the brain interprets as a thing (person/onion) based on how the brain is programmed to perceive energy?

    • @nataliatals7165
      @nataliatals7165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      *facepalm*

    • @madiebon_5440
      @madiebon_5440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nataliatals7165 Don’t let laymen near the electron microscope

  • @LegalLowGround
    @LegalLowGround 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3121

    "have you ever seen an atom?" me having seen Jimmy Neutron a ton as a kid: Pfff yeah....

    • @AndroidFerret
      @AndroidFerret 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Me who played stalker 2000hours ..

    • @poo_man
      @poo_man 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah thats about right

    • @will_marvin
      @will_marvin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      When they split the atom in the pencil eraser in the crossover with fairly odd parents

    • @auggie803
      @auggie803 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      -What the heii iz a PFFF

    • @NaviYT
      @NaviYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Jimmy: “Hey professor, what happens when you split an atom?”
      Author minding his own business’s pencil: *BOOM*

  • @Pettan_Supremacy
    @Pettan_Supremacy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1891

    It's been 8 years i think the technology would've grown even better

    • @champadevi2581
      @champadevi2581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +193

      Yes that's what I thought.
      Gotta wait until youtube recommends something new on this topic.

    • @backyardtortoise.
      @backyardtortoise. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      @@champadevi2581 instead of waiting, why don't you just search it up.

    • @champadevi2581
      @champadevi2581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +363

      @@backyardtortoise. There's no fun in that.
      Why look for it when you can wait for 5 more years and happen to stumble upon it and see how advanced we've become. Ecstasy.

    • @Nihilius87
      @Nihilius87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@champadevi2581 😂

    • @secretc.5214
      @secretc.5214 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@champadevi2581 ez

  • @scottmeager5919
    @scottmeager5919 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2605

    There is literally more space in a "solid" object than there is not.

    • @pattyryopotybuttongamer3063
      @pattyryopotybuttongamer3063 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      quick romhack troubleshooting guide
      -have you checked that the files are in the correct folders?
      -are they named correctly?
      -have you verified the romhack you are trying to use is for the update version of your game, whatever update that is?
      -have you verified that you are using the right versions of any plugins you are trying to use?
      -have you verified that no files are interacting with other cheat plugins you may be using?
      -have you tried disabling any plugins you may be using?
      -have you checked that the base game runs without problem?
      -have you tried re-downloading the relevant files and replacing them on the sd in case they were a bad download or a bad copy?

    • @bbesung6796
      @bbesung6796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@pattyryopotybuttongamer3063 yes

    • @howiestillgamez5326
      @howiestillgamez5326 2 ปีที่แล้ว +125

      @@pattyryopotybuttongamer3063 have you fucking checked what you are replying to

    • @frankforte8078
      @frankforte8078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@howiestillgamez5326 yes

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@howiestillgamez5326 - Copy and paste has gone into the wrong video. lol

  • @rajatrajput9316
    @rajatrajput9316 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    What if a single atom has a whole universe inside it😳
    It means we are living nowhere but inside an atom.

    • @fuckingdumbo
      @fuckingdumbo 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      dunbass indians
      can’t even write an original comment!!??

  • @Braindrain85
    @Braindrain85 5 ปีที่แล้ว +413

    I'd like to give a shout out to protons for keeping our community positive.

    • @irw4350
      @irw4350 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #metoo..................... oh, drat, its been used before

    • @XiJinping14
      @XiJinping14 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Boooooooo

    • @jeffyweffy6398
      @jeffyweffy6398 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice one😎

    • @apatriot6421
      @apatriot6421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      It's 2020 and being positive is the worst thing now 🤣

    • @nameinvalid33
      @nameinvalid33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      💀👍

  • @sokka47
    @sokka47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1028

    I'm like, 'Wow! So they can see atoms now.'
    Then I realised it's 8 years ago.

    • @SubtoUltraFoot
      @SubtoUltraFoot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Xd

    • @_j5126
      @_j5126 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      dang i wonder how far we have gone in 8 years now

    • @SubtoUltraFoot
      @SubtoUltraFoot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes🤣

    • @anshukandulna1844
      @anshukandulna1844 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      IBM making patents for 2nm transistors

    • @Chris-hw4mq
      @Chris-hw4mq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@anshukandulna1844 yet a fucking virus fucked the whole planet

  • @euanscotland
    @euanscotland 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2683

    I have always wondered if there is a universe in every single atom .

    • @hamburger9677
      @hamburger9677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +180

      There isnt

    • @accidentcarrot7225
      @accidentcarrot7225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +160

      @@hamburger9677 Who knows?

    • @hamburger9677
      @hamburger9677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

      @@accidentcarrot7225 no an atom is made out of subatomic particles not a universe

    • @adnansaleem6167
      @adnansaleem6167 3 ปีที่แล้ว +431

      @@hamburger9677 you did not get the context in which the statement was probably made.

    • @YouAreInfinity117
      @YouAreInfinity117 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      It would’ve been really dope

  • @GameUnCrafter
    @GameUnCrafter ปีที่แล้ว +79

    As a chemist, we actually did a lab where we could see literal atoms. It's a core memory of mine and I remember it like yesterday.

    • @yourlocalsister5788
      @yourlocalsister5788 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Woah how did the atoms look like?

    • @juicerak7269
      @juicerak7269 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Atom is so infinitely small that nobody has seen a clear actual atom. Even the video is 3d representation, there's no way what you saw are atoms

    • @r3b3lvegan89
      @r3b3lvegan89 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That’s not true at all. There’s a video showing gold atoms and it’s very real.

    • @BDizzleMySchnizzle
      @BDizzleMySchnizzle ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@r3b3lvegan89no, there isn't.

    • @BDizzleMySchnizzle
      @BDizzleMySchnizzle ปีที่แล้ว +10

      If you're a chemist then you know you didn't see an atom. Nobody has. Come on, dude.

  • @RorySucks
    @RorySucks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    Me: "Yeah, I have seen myself."

    • @AxxLAfriku
      @AxxLAfriku 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      NO! NO! NO! Many people say I am sick in the head. NOOOO!!!! I don't believe them. But there are so many people commenting this stuff on my videos, that I have 1% doubt. So I have to ask you right now: Do you think I am sick in the head? Thanks for helping, my dear bo

    • @SnoppleWopple
      @SnoppleWopple 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AxxLAfriku hi AxxL

    • @frankiegamingyt7657
      @frankiegamingyt7657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ?

    • @Royalrajput411
      @Royalrajput411 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AxxLAfriku wt are you atom

    • @Rahul-ps9jw
      @Rahul-ps9jw 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, You Saw More than one Atom. But You Can't see a Atom

  • @ultimategohan7567
    @ultimategohan7567 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1059

    "have you ever seen an atom"
    Why yes, I have electron microscope as eyes, what did you expect..

  • @sandstinger3454
    @sandstinger3454 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1011

    when you hold a solid object and then think about it being made up of tiny round objects held together by forces not touching each other
    the feeling is not describable

    • @stuffedpotato9826
      @stuffedpotato9826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Ikrr!!! Same feeling when you look at the sky and realize you're looking at thousands of humongous balls of fire millions of light years away from you 🤩🤩

    • @AntonioMedeiros-gb3cx
      @AntonioMedeiros-gb3cx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

      @@mickeyindahouse12 So because we've known about things for a long time it ceases to be special? My friend, you suffer from linear thought.

    • @vk67new67
      @vk67new67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      42

    • @etheriouse.n.d5263
      @etheriouse.n.d5263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@stuffedpotato9826 bascally looking at the past. you´ll never see the stars as they are right now in this moment but as they were tousands and millions of years away

    • @fx3dv2vg7m
      @fx3dv2vg7m 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      And yet, you're not touching atoms of a solid object either when holding it

  • @wongeric720
    @wongeric720 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2891

    Me about to sleep
    TH-cam: Have you ever seen an atom?

  • @icebluscorpion
    @icebluscorpion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Seeing the matrix at it finest structure with such fine detail gives my a very deeply sense of satisfaction and admiration for this universe that we live in

  • @Medicranger
    @Medicranger 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1344

    Ah, atoms... the pixels of the universe.

    • @emmanueloverrated
      @emmanueloverrated 8 ปีที่แล้ว +109

      They aren't, they are way too big... The size of a "universe pixel", if such a thing exists, would be more about at the scale of the Planck length, thus about 60,000,000,000,000,000,000 times smaller than a single proton. :P
      4k TVs still not that impressive.

    • @xbone4138
      @xbone4138 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Nekkz what about quantum foam??

    • @quarkyquasar893
      @quarkyquasar893 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, Not even close.

    • @quarkyquasar893
      @quarkyquasar893 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Smithstirini Well, about 1 atom per 4.18x10^(-30)m^3....

    • @davidlee2221
      @davidlee2221 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      +Nekkz thats if we live in a quantized universe, if we life in a continuum than were fucked for determining basic unit size.. its like being inside a cube in space and asking which direction the floor is.

  • @megaraitei
    @megaraitei 5 ปีที่แล้ว +864

    I was expecting to see like the nucleus surrounded by orbiting electron.

    • @markthomson4700
      @markthomson4700 4 ปีที่แล้ว +121

      @Chad Kimberley Of course, the cloud analogy isn't right either. Electrons are merely probablistic wave functions.

    • @GYJennyXD34
      @GYJennyXD34 4 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      electrons don’t orbit the nucleus! this is a common misconception & referred to as the solar system concept (planets orbit the sun).
      electrons are really clouds of the largest possibility of an existing negative charge :)

    • @KaalaantargatA
      @KaalaantargatA 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@GYJennyXD34 I appreciate your knowledge
      Please post in your channel

    • @kirikiri9269
      @kirikiri9269 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, but The title says, "The real atom", and those also dont have that much space in atomic radious, because all around the nucleous there are electrons, like so so many. A nucleous is drowning in there clouds. Thats why some molecules conduct electricity

    • @clmasse
      @clmasse 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@GYJennyXD34 The different electronic states in an atom have a well defined angular momentum, which means that they are orbiting in some sense. The cloud picture is another misconception.

  • @savcob6291
    @savcob6291 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2056

    Saw 2 helium isotopes... He He...

    • @rundom9047
      @rundom9047 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      XD

    • @silicalnz3008
      @silicalnz3008 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      +savcob I am such a nerd xD

    • @teeman9266
      @teeman9266 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +savcob
      buh-dum, TISH

    • @tombradford7035
      @tombradford7035 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      I'm that stupid I didn't get that joke.

    • @savcob6291
      @savcob6291 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Tom Bradford
      Helium is designated in chemistry as He

  • @borkbread3056
    @borkbread3056 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Now I’m waiting to see what a quark looks like

  • @manababa1313
    @manababa1313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4040

    Mad respect for the scientists thanks for answering my question that I didn’t have.

    • @essereferrari16
      @essereferrari16 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Why you gotta be mad bro

    • @manababa1313
      @manababa1313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@essereferrari16 I’m not

    • @emycharaa
      @emycharaa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@manababa1313 Don't listen to them, I don't understand why they're so mad lmao

    • @naturalcombat7495
      @naturalcombat7495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@emycharaa i cant even understand whether you’re joking or not

    • @adrianapollyon5087
      @adrianapollyon5087 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No one has ever seen an atom. Or a living virus. Or photons. All theoretical

  • @liammoore4371
    @liammoore4371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +434

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    Me: "Well yes but actually no"

    • @liammoore4371
      @liammoore4371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i was meant to put “well”

    • @abdullahal-mamun7365
      @abdullahal-mamun7365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@liammoore4371 edit it then

    • @ninjawizard7021
      @ninjawizard7021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Fashion cattle: I like to do these fashion things like asking and responding
      Me: fucking idiot teenagers

    • @ninjawizard7021
      @ninjawizard7021 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@abdullahal-mamun7365 you waste your time with demented people

    • @BisexualPlagueDoctor
      @BisexualPlagueDoctor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ninjawizard7021 why are you hostile like that? When did anyone ever say that? I don’t give a shit about fashion, but I’ve heard zero people say that asking and responding are fashionable.

  • @ThomerTD
    @ThomerTD 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1969

    Have you seen an atom?
    *Stares at anything*
    Now I have

    • @vodun270
      @vodun270 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      xdddd

    • @thepaperbagz7620
      @thepaperbagz7620 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ahaaaa

    • @daanklein880
      @daanklein880 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Nope. Actually not. We see because there is light. The wavelength of light is basically too big to see such detail. Electrons, on the other hand, do have a wavelength small enaugh to 'see' things as small as atoms.
      So, if your eyes would be able to see using electrons, you would technically be looking at atoms all the time. Though, we see using light, so it's a no go for us😂

    • @CeledonianError
      @CeledonianError 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@daanklein880 Well technically we're always looking at atoms, as everything is made of atoms

    • @user-td4do3op2d
      @user-td4do3op2d 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He made the same joke at the start of the video. Why does this have so many upvotes?

  • @beanju1ce_995
    @beanju1ce_995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    “have you ever seen an atom?”
    21.4 million people: *interesting*

  • @DR-7
    @DR-7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +484

    "Scients have found a way to see a singular atom!"
    Me, who can see billions:

  • @advocaciafidelis
    @advocaciafidelis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2360

    2 AM, i have to be up at 6AM for work
    TH-cam: have you ever seen an atom?
    Me: well, no. But O_O

  • @katniseverdien594
    @katniseverdien594 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A bunch of atoms looking at another bunch of atoms.

  • @karldilkington8587
    @karldilkington8587 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2824

    Why aren't there any flat atom conspiracy theories?

    • @karldilkington8587
      @karldilkington8587 6 ปีที่แล้ว +198

      How do you know bro? *They* could be lying to you!

    • @bayybars
      @bayybars 6 ปีที่แล้ว +282

      Karl Dilkington the government is hiding the truth, atoms are donut shaped

    • @Crunkmaster
      @Crunkmaster 6 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      there are now, good job

    • @cleden506
      @cleden506 6 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      string theory...

    • @keianawhite8339
      @keianawhite8339 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LOL :)

  • @bainy8366
    @bainy8366 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1671

    Have you ever seen an atom?
    **shows onion**
    Me: WTF

    • @navagharkiran5769
      @navagharkiran5769 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Alle bulle in onion also atom has

    • @hocuscantfocus5375
      @hocuscantfocus5375 5 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      You mean
      "Anion"
      🕶️

    • @zikiel3716
      @zikiel3716 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@navagharkiran5769 not kidding

    • @vierspartan117
      @vierspartan117 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're new in this side of TH-cam

    • @Rama_Verma_
      @Rama_Verma_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@navagharkiran5769 😂😂😂😂 that contains cell buddy

  • @aminimoose3971
    @aminimoose3971 2 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    "I am atoms."
    --Some guy named Adam

    • @waitwhatihavefriends2181
      @waitwhatihavefriends2181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The adams family

    • @chornobylreactor4
      @chornobylreactor4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Atoms crafts store got some real nice graphite pencils

    • @bruhsset
      @bruhsset 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Megan Fox and MKG in an alternate universe

    • @borayucel4911
      @borayucel4911 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you wanna tell “Adam” in turkish or surname one

  • @perfi4333
    @perfi4333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Atoms are also the reason we are watching this.

  • @21MilesAhead
    @21MilesAhead 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1614

    I expected to get to see one atom and not 27k of atoms together

    • @thebadger4040
      @thebadger4040 8 ปีที่แล้ว +162

      Ain't that a bonus?

    • @davemarx7856
      @davemarx7856 8 ปีที่แล้ว +117

      you expect something that is currently impossible.
      even if we could isolate one atom, it would look like a blurry dot. we would not be able to see the electrons that orbit the protons and neutrons in the middle.
      if you look at an electron you interfere with it's orbit and possibly destroy a family of Whos.

    • @TheBunnygirl20
      @TheBunnygirl20 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      +Dave Marx lol

    • @dianehaiber
      @dianehaiber 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      If you are interested in single-atom microscopy, you might want to check out David Muller's work on single-atom diffraction (scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ:g8uWPOAv7ggC) - this is just a conference abstract but the work is probably being published soon. I'm a grad student studying electron microscopy myself, and imaging single-atoms is quite difficult due to sample syntehsis and beam-specimen interactions. In my experience of microscopy of gold nanoparticles (supported on a thin film of carbon), single atoms are briefly visible and tend to agglomerate and form tiny clusters (to minimize surface energy). So isolating one for long enough to obtain a stable image with high signal-to-noise ratio is not trivial.

    • @tomislavrastovac2127
      @tomislavrastovac2127 8 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      His expectation wasn't illogical given the video title, and that's kind of the point. He's saying that the title is misleading, a click bait. Cool video nontheless..

  • @killerkitten7534
    @killerkitten7534 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2136

    “Over time microscopes have become more powerful”
    Me: Wow, is that what an atom looks like? Looks like an onion lol
    “These onion cells for example”
    Me: oh…

  • @douglasthompson9070
    @douglasthompson9070 8 ปีที่แล้ว +763

    You're not seeing the actual atoms. You're seeing the electron vibrations of the atoms. The atom is mostly empty space with a nucleus. And that nucleus is 100K times smaller than the width of the atom. So the 3D model is a representation of the representational image of the outer electron shell of a bunch of platinum atoms. Most likely using a modified electron microscope. But it's still cool.

    • @douglasthompson9070
      @douglasthompson9070 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Of course, what is seeing anyway but just a very narrow bandwidth of visible light photons bouncing off energy fields of electrons traveling around at the speed of light then hitting our eyes for our brain to process. The energy fields are all we will ever get see I think on the atomic level.

    • @VeNoMS4
      @VeNoMS4 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      they use a TEM for this and there are no photons involved here. it's all electrons because you cannot get a photon beam in the angstroms

    • @Ferelmakina
      @Ferelmakina 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      not really. in a metallic bond like that, the cores are toghether and the electrons move freely around the material

    • @elimalinsky7069
      @elimalinsky7069 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well, seeing the electron cloud is crazy enough as it is. Seeing the actual nucleus and individual protons and neutrons is still science-fiction.

    • @Ferelmakina
      @Ferelmakina 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eli Malinsky IF they exist...

  • @CalvinHikes
    @CalvinHikes ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It may look blurry but it's literally the most in focus image ever taken.

  • @patzino7701
    @patzino7701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +436

    Thinking about these atoms feels almost weird as thinking about space and time.

    • @AldenJohnson
      @AldenJohnson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      its funny that we've made atoms indirectly show us what atoms look like

    • @harryballzanga
      @harryballzanga 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Maybe what we observe as space is simply something the size of an atom in something of a greater scale.

    • @s3ntin3l60
      @s3ntin3l60 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@AldenJohnson that's why I don't quite buy this lol. Atom...help me see an atom.

    • @ay33773
      @ay33773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@harryballzanga we’re just a universe inside an atom

    • @talizorahnarrayya5916
      @talizorahnarrayya5916 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@s3ntin3l60 wdym?

  • @denilsson31
    @denilsson31 8 ปีที่แล้ว +285

    What we see is the electric field of the atom. It is impossible to see it like we commonly understand it.

    • @DanielRamirez-vm3be
      @DanielRamirez-vm3be 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Uncertainty Principle, in one image

    • @thesnare100
      @thesnare100 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, I think it may be impossible to actually see the subatomic particles- that is- the nucleus and the electrons. There's the scanning tunnel microscope which shows them as small spheres, but I'm not sure it's possible to actually see the proton and the electron that orbits it in a hydrogen atom. The way our eyes work is by picking up visible light waves that reflect off of something, visible light couldn't reflect off of a proton or an electron.

    • @giotag1819
      @giotag1819 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      +thesnare100
      We are talking about *electron* microscopes here, and by "seeing" we mean scanning a target with an electron beam, then detecting the transmitted beam or the interactions with the sample's surface, and transforming that into an image on a screen, which our eyes can see.
      The minimum wavelength of visible light (400 nm) means the theoretical limit of the resolution of a light microscope is around 200 nm, much more than the size of an atom.

    • @ffggddss
      @ffggddss 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      + denilsson31
      It's an *imaging technique*.
      But then, so are our eyes, if you really break down the physics of seeing.
      So yes, we *are* seeing atoms here.
      Granted, it's somewhat second-hand, because we see, with our eyes, the images of them that are produced by this contraption; but that's qualitatively no different from looking at something through an ordinary light microscope.

    • @DanielRamirez-vm3be
      @DanielRamirez-vm3be 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Another way to see them would be using x-rays or gamma rays instead of visible light, cause them have their wavelengths closer to the scales of an atom and a nucleus respectfully, and let the computer do the work transforming the data into visible light, like the infrared images of the Hubble

  • @harrisonmoore3841
    @harrisonmoore3841 4 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    “Have I seen an atom?”
    Well yes, but actually no.

    • @CHUCKNORRIS-qw1me
      @CHUCKNORRIS-qw1me 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      i have seen atoms not an atom.

    • @suraj_danu
      @suraj_danu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It has 69 likes i don't wanto like it

    • @trt2013
      @trt2013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I daily see Trillions of Atoms! 😎

  • @nobi-xyz
    @nobi-xyz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’m waiting for that one person who’ll say “shoutout to the cameraman for magnifying the camera for us to see the atoms”

  • @afraibnat4621
    @afraibnat4621 4 ปีที่แล้ว +540

    Me: Can’t imagine how small an atom is
    Also me: Can’t imagine how enormous the multiverse is

    • @8EightMan
      @8EightMan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      also me: Can't imagine how enormous the biggest black hole ton 618 is

    • @JeeterJuice
      @JeeterJuice 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m gonna go Astro project to go explore the solar system

    • @feenboi8930
      @feenboi8930 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Midnight_ Editz astral*

    • @honey3206
      @honey3206 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not solar system , UNIVERSE

    • @SunitaSharma-qe4rk
      @SunitaSharma-qe4rk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also me: Can't imagine how enormous the whole universe is (or maybe multiverse)

  • @GM-dg6mj
    @GM-dg6mj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1800

    _have you ever seen an atom?_
    ant man: **laughs in particles**

    • @Daniel-dd6sj
      @Daniel-dd6sj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      He hasn't seen an atom because he goes subatomic really fast

    • @Daniel-dd6sj
      @Daniel-dd6sj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Thomas Daka really weird

    • @allah___maadarchod
      @allah___maadarchod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ant-Man can't see an atom.

    • @allah___maadarchod
      @allah___maadarchod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Thomas Daka do you think that the size of the electrons, protons and nutrons are shrinkable?🤔

    • @allah___maadarchod
      @allah___maadarchod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Thomas Daka well, the concept of the abilities of ant-man are not fictional by the way. Don't ask me anything about that. Just know that these abilities exist. You believe it or not, i leave that upto you. Oh btw, electrons, protons and nutrons are not shrinkable for god's sake !! You just make a material more dense when you shrink it. You don't lose molecules or mass while doing so. Similarly you don't gain mass by expanding something. That's basic physics. Well, if you notice, i didn't mention about weight. Why? I let you to find the answer.

  • @rectaalborween8471
    @rectaalborween8471 8 ปีที่แล้ว +679

    We are just atoms...TRYING TO UNDERSTEAND FUCKING ATOMS!

    • @ThrottleKitty
      @ThrottleKitty 8 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      And you are just the universe, complaining about the universe.

    • @stealthbeastgaming
      @stealthbeastgaming 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I understeand atoms just fine tyvm

    • @MrFuzziiWuzzii
      @MrFuzziiWuzzii 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      We're the universe discovering things about ourself.

    • @knifeyonline
      @knifeyonline 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      If God exists, and in the beginning there was only God... Doesn't that mean ANY creation is part of God? Nobody claims (not even the bible) that you can make something out of nothing. Therefore we are all part of the universe, and the universe is part of God.

    • @rectaalborween8471
      @rectaalborween8471 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Throttle Kitty What?

  • @George.Coleman
    @George.Coleman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "Have you ever... ever felt like this?"

  • @iwattasandwich8672
    @iwattasandwich8672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +625

    "How you ever seen an atom?"
    Oppenheimer: No, but I've split atoms.

    • @LoLFilmStudios
      @LoLFilmStudios 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      This is pretty dangerous, some people might say atomic bombs do not exist.

    • @TheBaffledZone
      @TheBaffledZone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@LoLFilmStudios what the fuck

    • @kaibluck1380
      @kaibluck1380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@TheBaffledZone atomic bombs work due to a chain reaction that splits atoms and releases the nuclear energy inside of them

    • @adambahri9369
      @adambahri9369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Little dark there bro

    • @HumanAndroid18
      @HumanAndroid18 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@LoLFilmStudios I know someone who says that

  • @helpmeget1ksubs.please284
    @helpmeget1ksubs.please284 2 ปีที่แล้ว +758

    *"So, after all... Its just pixels?"*
    *"N- actually, you got a point."*

    • @tanphatvo9670
      @tanphatvo9670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @DON'T are you mad we are not reading your profile?
      Or are you mad we “read” your profile...I didn’t even read it..what are you mad at

    • @wojak6351
      @wojak6351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@tanphatvo9670 he wants you to don't do it

    • @technologicalelite8076
      @technologicalelite8076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @DON'T old

    • @Ana11411
      @Ana11411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @DON'T 😑 another one

    • @tainted_bread
      @tainted_bread 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I... That... **dies**

  • @utkarshagarwal903
    @utkarshagarwal903 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1763

    So this video was basically
    - Have you seen an atom ?
    -No
    -Even we haven't

    • @kingsleymichael7533
      @kingsleymichael7533 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Succinct.

    • @TaylorYarick
      @TaylorYarick 6 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      I don't know why you'd comment that or why you have so many thumbs up. They literally showed you a lattice of individual atoms in the video. You can see each atom individually therefore you've now seen an atom

    • @K.B.Williams
      @K.B.Williams 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Fuc kYourAds agreed. That would be amazing to see

    • @almak8785
      @almak8785 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Utkarsh Agarwal THANK U ! i almost wasted time watching this already known shit

    • @ColinForBooks
      @ColinForBooks 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I was wondering about the fact that electrons are so far away from the nucleus, so what are we actually seeing? You said electron clouds, and that makes sense to me. The video makes ya think that an atom is a solid thing - cloud seems better. Thanks!

  • @R1PPA-C
    @R1PPA-C 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Kudos to the lab hand who picked up that particle and rotated it 1.8° a time for the cameraman

  • @letsgoquizzing2346
    @letsgoquizzing2346 3 ปีที่แล้ว +699

    Dalton :- No further than atom
    Today's scientists :- what's next after quarks ?? 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Physics_Rin
      @Physics_Rin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂😂😂😂

    • @Fivekey100
      @Fivekey100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Recently my course mates told our teacher that he did not teach us Dalton's atomic theory which he should have because it was in the book
      And my teacher burst into anger on us and on Dalton as if Dalton was his son who did not pause online games ... he considered his theory that useless 😂

    • @letsgoquizzing2346
      @letsgoquizzing2346 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Fivekey100 😂😂

    • @tanih_bhat
      @tanih_bhat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Strings

    • @pumpkin162
      @pumpkin162 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Live would've been easier won't it??

  • @sushantillusionist5786
    @sushantillusionist5786 8 ปีที่แล้ว +314

    we are made of atoms studying about atoms means atoms is studying itself

    • @Robertas919
      @Robertas919 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      You have no idea how close to truth you are... :D

    • @heavyglassglass
      @heavyglassglass 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +Robertas Ciparis
      Do you know the truth? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING FROM US?

    • @Robertas919
      @Robertas919 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      heavyglassglass
      Adom and Eve = Atom and Electron
      Thats all I will say to you. :D

    • @CharlieTangoYankee
      @CharlieTangoYankee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      "We have begun to contemplate our origins: starstuff pondering the stars; organized assemblages of ten billion billion billion atoms considering the evolution of atoms; tracing the long journey by which, here at least, consciousness arose."
      -Carl Sagan, "Cosmos"

    • @F4Y541
      @F4Y541 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      heavyglassglass it's just their retarded atoms overwhelming their regular atoms... Lol!

  • @mb5612
    @mb5612 2 ปีที่แล้ว +928

    “Have you ever seen an atom?”
    Then for two seconds I’m like, “Damn, an atom looks just like a slice of red onion!” 😂

  • @amberdavis5311
    @amberdavis5311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I could never grasp chemistry because the pictures were always drawings and I didn't believe them and wanted to know what the things really look like this video is so helpful in my journey of knowledge

    • @epmcgee
      @epmcgee ปีที่แล้ว

      This is basically just a high tech version of your science book. It's a 3D model of what we think it should look like.

    • @MrNarak
      @MrNarak 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I found the comment. Finally .

  • @sm__akash
    @sm__akash 4 ปีที่แล้ว +464

    I still remember that moment when I asked my high school teacher whether he ever saw the electron or not and in response I was sent out of the class for being a disturbing element in the class.😁

    • @meetings5145
      @meetings5145 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Good 4 u!!

    • @aadityakumarkarn
      @aadityakumarkarn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @Em Zet India 😂

    • @Metrion77
      @Metrion77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @RCube Clips Yep. Our knowledge about atoms is defined by our knowledge of electrons. And our knowledge of electrons is defined by our knowledge of atoms. Circular theoretical science: We know because we wrote a paper saying we know.

    • @metricdeep8856
      @metricdeep8856 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      SM Akash “disturbing element”. I like what you did there.

    • @nani54100
      @nani54100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@aadityakumarkarn bhakths spoted

  • @matteocarta7678
    @matteocarta7678 6 ปีที่แล้ว +338

    Before this video... I've never seen an atom.
    After this video. I've never seen an atom

    • @mr.evasion
      @mr.evasion 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is the thing with atoms and everything else for that matter VIBRATION. nothing is ever in a big enough space for a long enough time . Is this a Quantom Thing?

    • @rogerpersod9675
      @rogerpersod9675 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nor have you ever seen a grain of sand; so what, sand does not exist as grains???

    • @Snipsey01
      @Snipsey01 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      what?

    • @mr.evasion
      @mr.evasion 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If an atom could fill a ball park (stadium) then the nucleus of protons/ and/or neutrons would be the size of a grain of rice (!) The" empty space " is ENERGY. that's what we observe......

  • @Nomadic_1
    @Nomadic_1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    If you zoom in even further, you’ll see a blue ball circling another large yellowish-orange ball

    • @ducky4303
      @ducky4303 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      and the blue ball has "-" on it and the orange ball has "+"

    • @butterchuggins5409
      @butterchuggins5409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      That takes a lot of balls.

    • @brianlaudrupchannel
      @brianlaudrupchannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Get out

    • @canpy143
      @canpy143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bahahaha, i like that!

    • @larsswig912
      @larsswig912 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ducky4303 if you zoom in even further into the orange ball, you will see little red balls with pluses and plain green balls
      zoom in even further and you see even smaller little balls in groups of three with the letters u and d on them

  • @peppereater3028
    @peppereater3028 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1068

    Neutron walks into a bar and asks how much for a drink, bartender says for you no charge.

    • @srinukondapalli6160
      @srinukondapalli6160 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Really?

    • @chaoticyatan7115
      @chaoticyatan7115 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      #Lmao
      😄

    • @tinkmarshino
      @tinkmarshino 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      well that took guts! well played!

    • @AbhishekKumar-gx6oj
      @AbhishekKumar-gx6oj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      😂sheldon cooper

    • @einherz
      @einherz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no, he said no, you'll again lost your electron and will looks like fucking proton

  • @musskeeterbump
    @musskeeterbump 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    came to see atom and saw nothing but pixels

  • @ClauseLenen
    @ClauseLenen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me being made of atoms watching a video of atoms showing me atoms looking at atoms under a bunch of atoms on a device made of atoms.

  • @bernz2507
    @bernz2507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +331

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    Yes, its everywhere

  • @felpel1027
    @felpel1027 2 ปีที่แล้ว +453

    That’s so crazy! The atoms are aligned in perfectly straight lines and order, that means perfectly straight lines do exist in Nature, if you go deep enough

    • @mikemondano3624
      @mikemondano3624 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Wrong.

    • @fosibro4951
      @fosibro4951 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@mikemondano3624 explain

    • @gamer-px5cu
      @gamer-px5cu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@mikemondano3624 Existence it self comes before nature, we can create a perfect angle so a perfect angle actually exist.

    • @t-dog8528
      @t-dog8528 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@gamer-px5cu perfection is when you stop and say "I'm happy with the outcome" like my uneducated response, perfect.
      And the participation award goes tooooooo,
      ME🙆🙆🙆🙋🎉🥇

    • @Young_Dab
      @Young_Dab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gamer-px5cu What created existence? 🤔 Or how is existence created? 🤔

  • @plazmikpond
    @plazmikpond 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    basically it's a natural pixel

    • @hjembrentkent6181
      @hjembrentkent6181 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      not really

    • @plazmikpond
      @plazmikpond 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      you know what I mean I know it's a atom

    • @TimeMACH1NE
      @TimeMACH1NE 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ali Lerche what if that means we're in a simulation

    • @humanWhoUsesYoutube
      @humanWhoUsesYoutube 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not a atom it's an atom

  • @navaneethmohan9751
    @navaneethmohan9751 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fun fact : Atoms are seeing videos in an atom of atoms which are made by atoms

  • @LinKueiDragon
    @LinKueiDragon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +457

    Funny how you ask someone if they have ever seen an atom, when atoms literally make up everything

    • @chocolate_squiggle
      @chocolate_squiggle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      They are smaller than the wavelength of light that we use to 'see' - so no, no-one has ever 'seen' an atom. It's literally impossible.

    • @peelsreklaw
      @peelsreklaw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      We only "see" photons, and then not really...we see the projection of them into our consciousness. So all we really see is consciousness...is it made of atoms? Idk

    • @kifi672
      @kifi672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Energy is making up everything, yet we don't see it either

    • @krisreddish3066
      @krisreddish3066 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@peelsreklaw yes. Thoughts themselves are surely matter when stored in any case even when the chemicals of thoughts are not considered, only the electrical signal.

    • @WhiteUnicorn82
      @WhiteUnicorn82 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@peelsreklaw "Seeing" incorporates all from electrical signaling pathways of the brain/optical nerve/cones, photons after interactions with objects, and the interpretations we all make, etc, so we do all "see" these things, with photons making up just a part of what's needed for seeing.. I'm sure you knew this, however. We've slipped more towards language and definitions now :-/

  • @mttw_kzn2510
    @mttw_kzn2510 2 ปีที่แล้ว +494

    Narrator: Have you seen an atom?
    My atoms: *gasps* they're finally talking about us! Let's go guys to the top of his head!

    • @coastachancka
      @coastachancka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      LOL

    • @Freeemon
      @Freeemon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      *desintegrates*

    • @Icey-cream
      @Icey-cream 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no 1 laiwk fnf no you carep

    • @spyaccount6396
      @spyaccount6396 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Im just imagining them bouncing to get on top of the head
      ITS SUCH A STUPID BUT FUNNY THING TO IMAGINE

    • @TalpaTulpa
      @TalpaTulpa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @marouane Attahali it’s not chance or luck, it’s just things happening

  • @demonslayer045
    @demonslayer045 3 ปีที่แล้ว +302

    Fun fact :- you never actually touch any object, because every object including you is made of atom which is surrounded by orbits of electrons having negative charges. When you touch it with your hands the electrons of your hand and the electrons of the object (having like charges ) start repelling ,hence there is always an extremely small gap

    • @elka-bs8590
      @elka-bs8590 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ye

    • @rohanbari
      @rohanbari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      +1 That's right.

    • @JoseLopez-tk4tq
      @JoseLopez-tk4tq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Okay, but what about all those "flavors" of quarks?

    • @pranayaughade9406
      @pranayaughade9406 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Meanwhile me a weeb : so everyone's gojo🤡✨

    • @miak.5196
      @miak.5196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      Great, I can use this on my court hearing tomorrow. Thanks bro!

  • @gagandeepsingh_7374
    @gagandeepsingh_7374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    "Yes I am seeing one right now"

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why does that strike me as.....hilarious!!

  • @areyouactuallyreal
    @areyouactuallyreal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +293

    "Have you ever seen an atom?"
    18 million people: *"Maybe, lets confirm"*
    Edit1: changed from 16mil to 17mil in 4hrs
    Edit2: 18 mil now in 1 day

    • @user-lv1im7so5b
      @user-lv1im7so5b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Its 17 now

    • @areyouactuallyreal
      @areyouactuallyreal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      holy shit 4 hours ago it was 16. Will just edit this out 👍

    • @nonfb
      @nonfb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@areyouactuallyreal and this was uploaded years ago..

    • @Demomain-
      @Demomain- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TH-cam's algorithm: Ah, a video released 8 years ago.
      *i t ' s r e l e v a n t*

    • @ohareair552
      @ohareair552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don’t need to change it, no one will be mad at you

  • @CrammyCram
    @CrammyCram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    “Have you ever seen an atom?”
    Me: yes, but I’ll click anyway

    • @spidermanfromufa
      @spidermanfromufa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      aee)

    • @shinchanyt6089
      @shinchanyt6089 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Melon Musk your name tho

    • @shinchanyt6089
      @shinchanyt6089 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Melon Musk no that name is not funny your orginal name is funny. I really can't stop laughing till now.

  • @Richardddoobies
    @Richardddoobies 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    I once caught a single neutrino with a magnet and an aquarium net.

    • @Raskolnikovtzs
      @Raskolnikovtzs 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BULLSHIT! YOU'RE A LIAR!!

    • @Richardddoobies
      @Richardddoobies 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I DID! I kept it in a magnetic containment field for a week, but the power company shut me off and it got away. They said a residential line was not designed to draw 400,000 Kw.

    • @Raskolnikovtzs
      @Raskolnikovtzs 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rick Davidson Pay your bills, you'll see how the company don't shut you off.

    • @Richardddoobies
      @Richardddoobies 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They always told me not to look up at the sun, but I did, and a neutrino went right in my eye! It sailed through my skull and out the back of my head, and now I have mental problems!

    • @davidlee2221
      @davidlee2221 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      400,000 Kw per hour? per second?

  • @briankleinschmidt3664
    @briankleinschmidt3664 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No. I once met an Adam. He worked for me, but then got a better job at the courthouse. Nice fellow. I hope he is well.

  • @judyreyjumamoy
    @judyreyjumamoy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    have you ever seen an atom?
    this video: we neither

    • @kalaiyarasangunasekaran1835
      @kalaiyarasangunasekaran1835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      🤣

    • @esar1499
      @esar1499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly, these are 3D videos wtf.

    • @purpleman5243
      @purpleman5243 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hahahahahah

    • @lilyjr.1384
      @lilyjr.1384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins He is faithful and just to forgive us and cleanse us from all unrighteousness ❤️

  • @bigchungus6320
    @bigchungus6320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +417

    “Have you ever seen an atom”
    Yes but actually no

  • @lsporky3567
    @lsporky3567 7 ปีที่แล้ว +318

    If the atoms are the pixels of the universe... damn I'm so HD 6,7 10^27

    • @happydolphin1432
      @happydolphin1432 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      CarasGlassees Sounds stupid, doesn't works

    • @razmuzen1090
      @razmuzen1090 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      "Doesn't works" ironic

    • @DavidSanchez-tf3xo
      @DavidSanchez-tf3xo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      CarasGlassees maybe someone is ultra HD and they have a singularity TV.

    • @chadliampearcy
      @chadliampearcy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well How about ultra HD. Quarks and Electrons.

    • @briandiehl9257
      @briandiehl9257 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually plank length s the pixels, in which nothing can be smaller

  • @zifuade4056
    @zifuade4056 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    •••We are a bunch of atoms, watching through a bunch of atoms, a bunch of atoms trying to see a bunch of atoms through a bunch of atoms on a bunch of atoms•••

  • @nettowaku1252
    @nettowaku1252 5 ปีที่แล้ว +391

    Have you seen an atom?
    "Well yes but actually no."

  • @Burbie
    @Burbie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +326

    This was 7 years ago...
    I wonder what advancements have happened to this

    • @starscream2092
      @starscream2092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Now we can render this exact same video in 4K

    • @adamvarghesesatish3337
      @adamvarghesesatish3337 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Ummm this was 8 years ago loser . I am now filing a complaint against you to the police for being so dumb that you can't calculate how long ago 2013 was. You will also pay for my medical bills as I lost brain cells seeing you write down this was 7 years ago. I don't care if you call me a Karen.

    • @Burbie
      @Burbie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@adamvarghesesatish3337 u dont no how to count boomer
      It was on 27th of march 2013 , it's 16th march 2021 as of today
      8 years hasn't completed yet
      And TH-cam automatically shows for me "7 years ago" stupid fuck

    • @adamvarghesesatish3337
      @adamvarghesesatish3337 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@Burbie 🤣🤣🤣 I have successfully completed the task of trying to troll someone online without using aggressive or angry words . I tried my best to make a comment that does not make me look like I am pissed and somehow try and make someone else mad. I have done that succesfully even by being sarcastic. I want my internet points now

    • @Burbie
      @Burbie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@adamvarghesesatish3337 oh fuck off idiot...

  • @SimulationWithDaniel
    @SimulationWithDaniel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +197

    And this is 2013 omg 3 years later and ive never heard of this before lol

    • @ricksande2210
      @ricksande2210 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same XD

    • @davemarx7856
      @davemarx7856 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's the way They want it.
      😐

    • @Pidgey95
      @Pidgey95 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      same

    • @robin9740
      @robin9740 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Dave Marx I've used electron microscopy as a first year bachelor student. So no, they want us to know about this discovery. There would be no reason to not tell the world. It just wasn't sensational enough for mainstream media.

    • @davemarx7856
      @davemarx7856 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Robin Van Gaalen
      I was making a conspiracy theory joke.
      But, yeah. It's unfortunate that media will jump on "Flossing. Not really important?" but gloss over "Atomic particles? Still hard to see."

  • @muhammad_fahmi_ilma
    @muhammad_fahmi_ilma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, and this is found 9 years ago.

  • @aa-tx9su
    @aa-tx9su 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    1:26
    Oh cool you can see the 3D figure of the atom going left or right

  • @REAlREAction
    @REAlREAction 7 ปีที่แล้ว +282

    Watched a video claiming to show me what an atom looks like.
    Still don't know what an atom looks like.

    • @machaiquen
      @machaiquen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      REAl REAction and you probably never will because we are limited by how small we can see objects it is called heisenberg's uncertainty principle

    • @BeattapeFactory
      @BeattapeFactory 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      machaiquen heisenbergs uncertainty principle has nothing to do with the fact that we are not able to see atoms

    • @TheAsianDude888
      @TheAsianDude888 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      machaiquen Doesn't that only pertain to atom's electrons?

    • @daniramdani8144
      @daniramdani8144 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      haha.. same..

    • @EngelbertEichner
      @EngelbertEichner 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      my thoughts, but somehow i'm not disappointed.. was still interesting

  • @Nby-DIH
    @Nby-DIH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's interesting to see real blurry images than high-quality Cartoon images!! Thanks!!

  • @Dennizzz119
    @Dennizzz119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +365

    This was 8,5 years ago. Just imagine what has happened and has been learned in the mean time!

    • @omegaz6257
      @omegaz6257 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, atoms are cool.

    • @rkpyi8616
      @rkpyi8616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In 2019 if im not wrong they got blackhole picture

    • @TheSamuiman
      @TheSamuiman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes, how to create global hysteria about something that always existed and force entire populations to do things one never ever thought or even dreamed about!

    • @omegaz6257
      @omegaz6257 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rkpyi8616 Yes they did, it was orange-ish in the photo.

    • @matthewclark6239
      @matthewclark6239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nothing major, or we would have heard about it.

  • @faithfulgrl
    @faithfulgrl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +184

    This is so beyond the part of my brain that I know how to use.

  • @massimilianomontelatici9897
    @massimilianomontelatici9897 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I spent the second half of the video figuring out if the image is rotating left or right....

  • @diptadeepdas9562
    @diptadeepdas9562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +164

    Think our universe just look like this from outer space, however we are just a speck inside a super giant something living.

    • @geraldford6409
      @geraldford6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      There are some theories that our entire Universe is smaller than a Quark inside a larger universe

    • @clapdrix72
      @clapdrix72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@geraldford6409 What theories? Where are they published? I think you watched too much Men in Black.

    • @Lyrical14369
      @Lyrical14369 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@clapdrix72 not everyone is a conspiracy theorist, just go on google and type it in.

    • @geraldford6409
      @geraldford6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@clapdrix72 I should have said belief systems, as in Eastern or new age philosophies.
      The idea is, once you introduce additional spatial dimensions as string (ie sub quark scale) theory does, then like Dr Who’s Tardis, a Universe could fit into what appears to us a finite enclosed volume, whatever the scale of that volume. Similar to the Flatland 2d universe story, it’s inhabitants witnessing a 3D object like a sphere pass through their 2d universe, first an infinitesimal point, the a growing circle, then shrinking back down to a point and disappears.
      See
      Dalai Lama
      The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality

    • @xanthos9641
      @xanthos9641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@geraldford6409 Yeah I thought that when I was a child. No one can really concretely disprove it though (the big bang theory is almost concrete, but not truly proven), so I guess we'll never know until... we know lol