I just want to thank you guys for approaching Dakes in a non-judgmental way. So many channels are quick to pounce on any errors and conclude the entire work is invalid. The same logic can be used to refute the Textus Receptus, and the Codex Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, and most, if not all, of the work of Westcott & Hort.
@@DakePublishingThe publishers should have never discontinued the four column layout. The three column isn’t horrible, but the classic four column is better. The three column doesn’t even get the book titles correct. It says “Genesis. The first book of Moses.” Whereas the four column correctly says “The first book of Moses called Genesis.”
Awesome review. I was given a 1987 printing of the standard 4 column. It’s nice but bounded leather isn’t great for overall use and longevity. Also I just ordered the large print bonded leather. Hoping to get both rebounded in the future.
Antonio Laurenzana .. sorry it has taken me 2 years to respond to your note....regarding.. " "Awesome review. I was given a 1987 printing of the standard 4 column. It’s nice but bounded leather isn’t great for overall use and longevity. Also I just ordered the large print bonded leather. Hoping to get both rebounded in the future." I have had a couple Dakes bibles for the last 20 years or so.. but I saw that many are selling for 40- 70 dollars now on ebay in Genuine Leather.. at first I bought a bonded leather one off E bay for about 25.00.. and after about a year.. the cover became very tattered... the next one I got I paid more for... but the cover is amazing!.. it is so Soft.. in genuine leather.. it fits in my hand like a glove.. It has the softest cover.... the cover feels like soft skin... I have a couple ....as I said..... from around the year..2000..these are in genuine leather.. but Nothing like this one from the 70's... my first two Dakes with genuine leather covers.. feel like tree bark.. very rough..And Not pliable at all.. very Stiff... I know they are leather.. but they are NOT pliable...and Not very pleasant to the touch.. If you have Not already paid a bunch of money to have your Dakes rebound.. might I suggest.. you try shopping on Ebay?.. but make sure that the bible is for sure in genuine leather.. look at the photos.. a Dakes in Genuine leather will state "genuine leather".. in the bottom corner of the back cover.. and get an older one preferable from at least the 60's or 70's..
Good grief!! If most of you only have criticism for the Dakes then why did you watch the video? So you could sit in the seat of ridicule & judgment? If you’re not interested or here to learn something then just move along & take you condescending criticism along with you, please!
Never , God's word infallible, Not Dake's...you misrepresent and if Dake was anointed to do his calling, I would think you and people like you would be slower and pause with your comments. For sure your name doesn't reflect the King in the Bible. I expect more from you especially having the name "David"
@@DakePublishing I'm just telling you how it was in my church. To the leaders, if Dake wrote, then it was TRUE (according to our leaders). I'm not claiming that Dake himself thought he was infallible.
@@DakePublishing who is this reply meant for... certainly NOT me..?... I have never said a disparaging word regarding the Dake's bible.... please direct this reply to the proper individuals..
@@davidgagnon7806 YOUR WORDS: " I'm just telling you how it was in my church. To the leaders, if Dake wrote, then it was TRUE (according to our leaders). I'm not claiming that Dake himself thought he was infallible." I think that is the fault of church leadership then... they should be teaching the laity to be like the Bereans... searching out scripture for themselves to see if it is so... it is Not the place of leadership to sway people toward the use or away from the use of any particular bible... they can share with them pros and cons that are legitimate.. then let the people decide.. they may find out their leaders are lying to them... as far as Dake ...?.. well I am Not sure if he DID or DID NOT think himself infallible... but if he did think he was fallible... he would have recanted some parts of his bible that he thought were in error... BUT that does Not make him any worse than FARSTAD ..FALWELL...BARKER and others who have published bibles... at least they are committed to what they believe... it is up to us the laity to determine if what we are reading is correct... NOT church leadership..
i doubt it, You hold the plumb line to the Word of God. God can defend His own words. Immeasurable is such a arrogant statement. Learning to spell it would help you in life.
@@DakePublishing I have had a couple Dakes bibles for years.. but I never used them that much.. one Large print and one regular print... back then I thought there was too many notes in them.. and the Genuine leather covers felt very stiff.. and rough when holding them.. I don't know why the genuine leather covers felt so rough....even after applying tons of leather cream and softener to them.. and letting them sit.. in fact if I don't do this on a regular basis the black covers begin developing.. white streaks in between the leather scales.. about 2 years ago I saw some people selling Dakes bibles on line at good prices.. and I managed to get a ninth printing one.. from '76 in genuine leather.. and I have to say..... the cover melts in my hand .....it is so soft.. I was using the Liberty Annotated bible (one I had rebound in Goatskin about 18 years ago)... for about 20 years.. but for the past 2 years I have only been using my Dakes.. what a God send.. I did not even mind all the markings from the previous owner in it... this bible is a real blessing.. now I can hold it.. without giving my hand a blister..
I seriously doubt it. Is Dake guilty? then guilty for what believing God's word.guilty as charged. Hmm let me think when Finis Dake went to Heaven, He was chastised for believing God's word. I seriously doubt it, Most people who have a problem with Dake , they stubble over believing God's word. Whether you agree with him on how the Word should be studied go for it but to say He didn't believe the Literal word of God as it was written is a lie and not an honest person. Literal is safe unless the bible uses symbolism that conveys a truth. It is human nature to discredit someone you don't agree with and especially true to talk bad about someone WHEN YOU WILL LOOK FOR ANYTHING TO DISCREDIT HIM OR HER.
@@DakePublishing I never stated J Finis Dake did not believe the Literal word of God... I love his bible.. I had a question regarding the covers available over the years for this... I have this very soft grain cover that feels like lambskon... and I have Not felt another like it... it is from the 8th printing 1976... do you know anything about the Dakes leather covers over the years..?
I just want to thank you guys for approaching Dakes in a non-judgmental
way. So many channels are quick to pounce on any errors and conclude the entire work is invalid.
The same logic can be used to refute the
Textus Receptus, and the Codex Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, and most, if
not all, of the work of Westcott & Hort.
I would sell you a genuine leather version but I took my scissors and cut out all the heretical study notes, so there isn't much left of it.
you wear the name like a badge of honor
@@balaamsass5540 LOVE YOU BROTHER
@@DakePublishingThe publishers should have never discontinued the four column layout. The three column isn’t horrible, but the classic four column is better. The three column doesn’t even get the book titles correct. It says “Genesis. The first book of Moses.” Whereas the four column correctly says “The first book of Moses called Genesis.”
Awesome review. I was given a 1987 printing of the standard 4 column. It’s nice but bounded leather isn’t great for overall use and longevity. Also I just ordered the large print bonded leather. Hoping to get both rebounded in the future.
Antonio Laurenzana .. sorry it has taken me 2 years to respond to your note....regarding..
"
"Awesome review. I was given a 1987 printing of the standard 4 column. It’s nice but bounded leather isn’t great for overall use and longevity. Also I just ordered the large print bonded leather. Hoping to get both rebounded in the future."
I have had a couple Dakes bibles for the last 20 years or so.. but I saw that many are selling for 40- 70 dollars now on ebay in Genuine Leather.. at first I bought a bonded leather one off E bay for about 25.00.. and after about a year.. the cover became very tattered... the next one I got I paid more for... but the cover is amazing!.. it is so Soft.. in genuine leather.. it fits in my hand like a glove.. It has the softest cover.... the cover feels like soft skin...
I have a couple ....as I said..... from around the year..2000..these are in genuine leather.. but Nothing like this one from the 70's... my first two Dakes with genuine leather covers.. feel like tree bark.. very rough..And Not pliable at all.. very Stiff... I know they are leather.. but they are NOT pliable...and Not very pleasant to the touch.. If you have Not already paid a bunch of money to have your Dakes rebound.. might I suggest.. you try shopping on Ebay?..
but make sure that the bible is for sure in genuine leather.. look at the photos.. a Dakes in Genuine leather will state "genuine leather".. in the bottom corner of the back cover.. and get an older one preferable from at least the 60's or 70's..
I love my dake. Do I agree with everything he does? No. But that’s the same with ANY study Bible. I’m a Pentecostal pastor so Definitely a great Bible
Good grief!! If most of you only have criticism for the Dakes then why did you watch the video? So you could sit in the seat of ridicule & judgment? If you’re not interested or here to learn something then just move along & take you condescending criticism along with you, please!
In my cult, all the Kool Kids had a Dake's Bible. And Dake's notes were as infallible as the scripture itself.
lol🤣
Never , God's word infallible, Not Dake's...you misrepresent and if Dake was anointed to do his calling, I would think you and people like you would be slower and pause with your comments. For sure your name doesn't reflect the King in the Bible. I expect more from you especially having the name "David"
@@DakePublishing I'm just telling you how it was in my church. To the leaders, if Dake wrote, then it was TRUE (according to our leaders). I'm not claiming that Dake himself thought he was infallible.
@@DakePublishing who is this reply meant for... certainly NOT me..?... I have never said a disparaging word regarding the Dake's bible.... please direct this reply to the proper individuals..
@@davidgagnon7806
YOUR WORDS:
" I'm just telling you how it was in my church. To the leaders, if Dake wrote, then it was TRUE (according to our leaders). I'm not claiming that Dake himself thought he was infallible."
I think that is the fault of church leadership then... they should be teaching the laity to be like the Bereans... searching out scripture for themselves to see if it is so... it is Not the place of leadership to sway people toward the use or away from the use of any particular bible... they can share with them pros and cons that are legitimate.. then let the people decide.. they may find out their leaders are lying to them...
as far as Dake ...?.. well I am Not sure if he DID or DID NOT think himself infallible... but if he did think he was fallible... he would have recanted some parts of his bible that he thought were in error...
BUT that does Not make him any worse than FARSTAD ..FALWELL...BARKER and others who have published bibles... at least they are committed to what they believe... it is up to us the laity to determine if what we are reading is correct... NOT church leadership..
why is this vertical
Dake was off in hos own world
@6:52 - Dispensationalism
Dakes ughh. Not my favorite
what is your favorite?
God's word should be your favorite not Dake's words
Dake Heresy & Lies as done inmesurable damage to the Body of Christ too !
i doubt it, You hold the plumb line to the Word of God. God can defend His own words. Immeasurable is such a arrogant statement. Learning to spell it would help you in life.
@@DakePublishing I have had a couple Dakes bibles for years.. but I never used them that much.. one Large print and one regular print... back then I thought there was too many notes in them.. and the Genuine leather covers felt very stiff.. and rough when holding them.. I don't know why the genuine leather covers felt so rough....even after applying tons of leather cream and softener to them.. and letting them sit.. in fact if I don't do this on a regular basis the black covers begin developing.. white streaks in between the leather scales..
about 2 years ago I saw some people selling Dakes bibles on line at good prices.. and I managed to get a ninth printing one.. from '76 in genuine leather.. and I have to say..... the cover melts in my hand .....it is so soft.. I was using the Liberty Annotated bible (one I had rebound in Goatskin about 18 years ago)... for about 20 years.. but for the past 2 years I have only been using my Dakes.. what a God send..
I did not even mind all the markings from the previous owner in it... this bible is a real blessing.. now I can hold it.. without giving my hand a blister..
I seriously doubt it. Is Dake guilty? then guilty for what believing God's word.guilty as charged. Hmm let me think when Finis Dake went to Heaven, He was chastised for believing God's word. I seriously doubt it, Most people who have a problem with Dake , they stubble over believing God's word. Whether you agree with him on how the Word should be studied go for it but to say He didn't believe the Literal word of God as it was written is a lie and not an honest person. Literal is safe unless the bible uses symbolism that conveys a truth. It is human nature to discredit someone you don't agree with and especially true to talk bad about someone WHEN YOU WILL LOOK FOR ANYTHING TO DISCREDIT HIM OR HER.
@@DakePublishing I never stated J Finis Dake did not believe the Literal word of God... I love his bible..
I had a question regarding the covers available over the years for this... I have this very soft grain cover that feels like lambskon... and I have Not felt another like it... it is from the 8th printing 1976...
do you know anything about the Dakes leather covers over the years..?
Real scholars do not use Dake’s.
laughing
Dakes was a real scholar and He used one .. if it's good enough for Dakes it's good enough for me..
@@jeffcarlson3269 Balderdash!
You never dislike a Bible. Even a Dakes? Guess there is no reason to watch your reviews since I now know you will like anything.