A Russian SPY PLANE Flies Above a US Aircraft Carrier, Then THIS Happened...

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • The vast expanse of the ocean is a silent witness to many untold stories. But what happens when the skies above these waters become a battleground for strategic moves and counter-moves? Imagine a scene where a Russian spy plane flies dangerously close to a US aircraft carrier. What are the immediate reactions of the crew? How does the US Navy respond? And what are the broader implications of such encounters?
    To understand the gravity of this encounter, we first need to grasp the significance of the players involved. The US aircraft carrier, a floating fortress of power, represents a significant element of American military might. These behemoths are designed to project power, maintain peace, and respond swiftly to threats worldwide. With a crew of thousands and an air wing capable of striking targets hundreds of miles away, the aircraft carrier is the centerpiece of the US Navy’s strategic operations. These vessels are marvels of modern engineering, equipped with advanced radar systems, powerful defensive weaponry, and the capacity to launch and recover a wide variety of aircraft, from fighter jets to reconnaissance drones.
    #usnavy #russia #aircraftcarrier
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Become a member and proudly bear the title of 'Navy Life Supporter'!
    As a 'Navy Life Supporter', you show your appreciation and respect for all Navy Sailors. By becoming a member, you not only support this channel but also enjoy fun extras like unique badges and emojis, and your comments get the attention they deserve!
    Let's share special experiences and stories in the comments under the videos. This is the chance for former sailors to reminisce and for everyone curious about life at sea. It's more than just sharing stories; let's together discover and share the fascinating and diverse aspects of maritime life. Let's strive to show the world how intriguing and complex the life of a sailor at sea can be, with all its challenges and adventures.
    Together, we offer a glimpse into the unique world of the navy and show our appreciation for the brave men and women who brave the open sea and defend our country. Whether you want to relive old sea tales or learn more about the maritime world, it's all possible here.
    Do you also want to show your appreciation and support for the brave men and women of the Navy? Support this channel by becoming a member!
    Click the link below and proudly become a 'Navy Life Supporter'!
    / @navyproductions
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Note: "This channel is exclusively intended for entertainment, informative, and educational purposes. The content herein does not reflect the official positions or policies of the US Navy or any other naval units from various countries. Some videos may present hypothetical scenarios and should not be interpreted as actual events. The appearance of visual material from the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) or other military sources neither implies nor constitutes an endorsement by the DoD or these organizations."
    We use images and content in accordance with TH-cam's Fair Use copyright guidelines. We also give as much credit as possible to our sources. If we have forgotten to do this, please contact us via our email address!

ความคิดเห็น • 516

  • @navyproductions
    @navyproductions  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    What do you think are the long-term effects of such confrontations between Russian spy planes and US aircraft carriers? Could these incidents lead to larger conflicts, or do they help maintain peace through deterrence?👇🏼

    • @wmverk
      @wmverk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Depends on where the US carrier located 😅

    • @Leshiy_52
      @Leshiy_52 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      You can tell us about the destroyer Donald Cook and the Su-24 in the Black Sea. Why did the entire crew quit?

    • @LittoralPinniped
      @LittoralPinniped 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Leshiy_52 BullSh*t!!!

    • @michaelwimberly4509
      @michaelwimberly4509 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Imagine their response, if we do NOT respond! Haha. “Ok, fly over….We are still going to win. How many people like to play the game, when you have stopped playing the game? Roll the dice 100x in Monopoly. Buy every property. I stopped playing after I put hotels on BoardWalk and Park Avenue because I know that I am going to win”.

    • @michaelwimberly4509
      @michaelwimberly4509 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And, who cares about the Russian ‘bear’. I lived there. It was a great country, when I moved there. I remember 19:30 on election day, and fireworks. I said, “I thought the elections ended at midnight”. She said, “He already knows he won”. I said, “He knew THAT, 16 years ago”. She cross-eyed me, “WHAT?!”…….”Nothing, мишка”. Quit playing the game. Give them nothing to work with. I love to talk trash. The minute somebody stops replying, I get angry, then go to sleep. By the way, we used to sing a lullaby, that describes a wolf (Americans, because we smile/show our teeth), stealing babies from their Mother……if people were more familiar with the cultures of their opponents, America might have prevented a lot of casualties throughout the decades. What is YOUR OPINION, Navy?

  • @nunyabeeswax9463
    @nunyabeeswax9463 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    I'm an old school Electronic Warfare Technician. WLR-1 old school. If the spy plane was radiating the SLQ-32 would give the ship a few minutes heads up before the plane appears on radar.
    The Snoopy detail was always fun......

    • @Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P
      @Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Roger That EW.... I right next to ya As your Watch Sup - OS.
      And Thanks for your Service, Sacrifice and Time!!

    • @macy-gu6vl
      @macy-gu6vl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      I remember as a radarman standing watch in ECM. We were attacked off the coast of Vietnam. I'm still on high alert.

    • @timd1833
      @timd1833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Ditto for me, Whirrly-1 & Slick-32

    • @artimustrieste1480
      @artimustrieste1480 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@macy-gu6vl @macy-gu6vl They never should have take the Tech out of Radar men / OS. That was a big Mistake.
      Here's to you 👍

    • @3DPDK
      @3DPDK 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P OS as watch supervisor over EW? .... um .... what Navy were you in?

  • @2ndchance431
    @2ndchance431 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I remember watching the P3 Orions take off from Moffett Field in the early 70s when I worked at the Lockheed location next to Moffett. It eas really interesting to see the U2s take off as well! As soon as they were airborn they went almost vertical to gain altitude quickly. Awesome!

  • @daydreamer0923
    @daydreamer0923 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Thank you. 👋🙂
    Completely unsure what is what up there, however I do believe in our Country & it's no how. Our military has been doing & wining wars for along time now. Thank you to everyone of those who have fought for our many freedoms.💙💯💙. Thank you for your work to give this information.

    • @bruceage9er
      @bruceage9er 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Our country doesn't whine wars. We win them.

    • @Jaime-u5m
      @Jaime-u5m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Our military is constantly "doing", winning? that's up for debate.

    • @MrGarymola
      @MrGarymola 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      many would say we haven't won a war since WW2.

  • @timlane5445
    @timlane5445 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    In my time in the Navy. 197@-1981. We had Russian Bear Aircraft fly near and over us all the time. We always sent fighter aircraft to escort them from beyond us. I worked Flight deck on H-3 helicopter and S-3 on USS Midway and USS Saratoga. We always had Russian boat trail us all the time in the Indian Ocean.

    • @denisekennedy3099
      @denisekennedy3099 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      How often did US/NATO aircraft or ships follow Russian navy ships? Was it ever done on a tit-for-tat basis? I have never served in any military role and I find all this insight from those of you who have served absolutely fascinating.

    • @ronjones9447
      @ronjones9447 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@denisekennedy3099we followed or observed them, same as they did us. It was routine stuff. There was a time when the USS kitty hawk a conventionally powered US super carrier ran over a nuke Russian sub

    • @robertopiedimonte2078
      @robertopiedimonte2078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@denisekennedy3099
      US and UK nuclear submarine used to trail soviet nuclear submarine waiting them directly on exit from their homeport!!!
      Above the surface, if there was something interesting or warning NATO, thanks to aircraft carriers they were tracking it by greater distance.
      Another deadly game played, as done with submarines, was to have an old almost ineffective allied ship, usually a Gearing destroyer underwent Fram II modernization, staying in the wake of carrier officially in case of plane crash or man overboard, but in reality to be hit by taylor made soviet torpedo following the unique wake of an aircraft carrier!
      Crazy times, not crazy as now with Putin, which is hard to understand if he is mad or a wonderful poker player caged in his own propaganda of a Great Russia...

    • @TheHallway7
      @TheHallway7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      We got permission to moon the bears on my LST’s flight deck in the early 80’s.

    • @williampick2910
      @williampick2910 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Repetitive message and images. Go NAVY.

  • @skipperclinton1087
    @skipperclinton1087 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    It's been awhile since I was out there "in it" but I would imagine that long before that spyplane got even close it was being painted with the weapons targeting radar in the passive mode.
    Firing solutions were already made so going "hot" only takes the flip of a switch.

  • @jfjerez
    @jfjerez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Nice description of what happen…I being on this situations many times. I spend 20 years in the Navy all in aircraft carrier, and let me tell you .. I think the Russians know exactly what we doing, almost every single time that they do this is when we have out celebration of beer day, BBQ, Ice Cream social, even on WOG day.. we might be in the flight deck celebrating, running playing some ball excessive and suddenly! Alert clear flight deck and lunch the alert 5… yes… those 2 alert 5 are planes in a Cat position with crew seat ready to go… and our celebration was interrupted because some of those Russian planes decided to fly too close.. they probably were looking as they flyby ( because they do, I seen at least one that flow over the carrier but escorted by out fighter..

  • @thomas1699
    @thomas1699 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    You said a whole lot to say very little. Basically, the same thing over again with the words rearranged.

    • @christerstabis3187
      @christerstabis3187 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Exactly my thought ! Didn't learn anything new...

    • @Jaime-u5m
      @Jaime-u5m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      isn't this what we do daily? small talk!

    • @christerstabis3187
      @christerstabis3187 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Jaime-u5m Not comparable at all. Apple and oranges. Besides, if you say the same thing over and over again to someone (at the same occasion) I guess that person would think you are quite tirening to listen to...

  • @macy-gu6vl
    @macy-gu6vl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    I was a radarman off the coast of Vietnam we were attacked by enemy aitcraft. Im still on high alert.

    • @gbonkers666
      @gbonkers666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I seem to remember reading something about that.....

    • @garyhester3424
      @garyhester3424 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Thank you and good job !

    • @umbertomaresca6192
      @umbertomaresca6192 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      are you Vietnamese?... if not what were u doing there..

    • @T-BwBerlinKarlshorst-
      @T-BwBerlinKarlshorst- 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Als ihr von feindlichen Flugzeugen vor Vietnam angegriffen wurdet???
      Ihr seid der Agressor gewesen !!! Der völkerrechtswiedrig mit Kriegsverbrechen & chemischen Waffen Vietnam angegriffen habt. Das andere waren die heldenhaften Verteidiger eines souveränen Landes.

    • @JuanHernandez-ev4bb
      @JuanHernandez-ev4bb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Spying pos.

  • @kevinelrod323
    @kevinelrod323 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Flying over one is MUCH DIFFERENT than flying AT one.

  • @Wizwiz2112
    @Wizwiz2112 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Brings back lots of memories. Different times 70’s through 80s Russian bears Tu-95s flew at us all the time. We would always know they were coming. I’m talking in the middle of the Indian Ocean. Well before that young radar operator knew they were coming. At a certain point they were intercepted by a couple of fighters. F4s on my first time. They would get close enough to see the pilot from the flight deck. Never over. As they approached say from the port side hundreds of well wishers would line up and moon them. The tu95 would pass circle back and come down the starboard side. All would run across the flight deck and repeat. I I’ve been out 30 plus years now so I doubt if that happens any more. Cold War games!! Different times. Way different times. Former CTO2 USN

    • @denisekennedy3099
      @denisekennedy3099 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      This is hilarious. Did Soviet naval crews do anything similar?

    • @gbonkers666
      @gbonkers666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Or the Russians showing them Playboy magazines...

    • @EduardoNunez-bt6vb
      @EduardoNunez-bt6vb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😀😃😄😆😂🤣😎😺🐕

    • @roysheaks1261
      @roysheaks1261 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can’t do a full moon with women onboard.

    • @robertbailey8444
      @robertbailey8444 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was a flight engineer on a P3B and later on a P3C from 75 to 81 out of Brunswick ME. When we deployed we were for the most part shadowed by the TU-95 bears on occasion we would loose them by flying very low altering our course and flying without any lights or equipment giving away our location. When we encountered Russian ships we had a free fall shoot that we could drop items out the aircraft. On occasion we would take hustler or penthouse type reading materials put them in a weighted plastic bag and practice dropping them on the ships when we flew over them. They didn’t seam to mind us flying directly over them. In fact they always smiled and waved at us. On occasion they would shoot flairs or light us up with very bright flood lights and we would return the favor. Those were the days I’ve visited 21 counties in my 6 years flying and my flight hours are just over 2,700 hour as a flight engineer. When I was with VP-11 in December 1979 we lost an aircrew (13 of my best friends)they flew into a mountain in the Canary Islands. While tracking a Russian sub. At the time weather was zero visibility we were flying a small contingency of 3 birds out of Lajes in the Azores these were the days before GPS all navigation was done with time and distance charts the mountain they hit was around 6000ft and we were told they impacted the mountain at 5300 ft saddest of times and the reason I didn’t stay in the navy and go on as an officer and finally a pilot. Freedom is not free god rest there souls AMS-1 Bailey.

  • @ChadDonley-rs3nn
    @ChadDonley-rs3nn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    What they didn't talk about ..... like when a f35 pops out of no where when the Russians were looking at other distractions.

    • @johnhopkins6260
      @johnhopkins6260 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      With a terse message: "maybe it's best if you just go home"

    • @EnglishTurbines
      @EnglishTurbines 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The mistaken belief that an F35B is "stealth.....🤔😳😏🇬🇧

  • @brianhollister1005
    @brianhollister1005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Right that is why it is all over news

  • @angelpony1657
    @angelpony1657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The Outcome could go either way-Good OR Bad...
    That’s Where AND Why:
    Making Good, Sound, Solid Choices AND Decisions
    in the moment-
    IS-So IMPORTANT.
    You Don’t send ‘Just Anybody’ up there-
    When there’s The Potential,
    For an International Aerial Dogfight...
    Real Happens.
    God Bless,
    😇
    🙏🏻

  • @katwitanruna
    @katwitanruna 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I remember hearing a story about an aircraft carrier that had a medieval reenactment group on it of which the Captain was a member. They saw Russians incoming and he called mandatory fighter practice on the flight deck. I’ve always loved that story.
    In case you’re wondering, it was a Society for Creative Anachronism group.

    • @denisekennedy3099
      @denisekennedy3099 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Brilliant. I bet the Soviet/Russian pilots were laughing their heads off and had a hard time getting anyone to believe them if they didn’t photograph or film it. Great story, thank you.

  • @Steve33-c4o
    @Steve33-c4o 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you ALL for your selfless service 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍🏽

  • @renerenatorivera9062
    @renerenatorivera9062 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was a Combat Information Center Officer on my last ship. This brought back memories of radar screens and "MO" boards

  • @williamdodge5123
    @williamdodge5123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Full Moon salute from flightdeck crew!!!

    • @stephentaylor280
      @stephentaylor280 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We did the full moon naval salute when we sonar pinged the hell out of a Russian submarine when it surfaced next to us in the Med.

  • @miraclemax08
    @miraclemax08 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Lisa and Bart Simpson in the backseat: I'm not touching you. . . I'm not touching you

  • @wernerpanchenko6542
    @wernerpanchenko6542 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    They used to do that to us off the va capes at flight deck level their fishing snooper vessels would follow us 20 miles of the coast

  • @ElimanGibba
    @ElimanGibba 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    It’s a game that can turn bad.

  • @buzz385
    @buzz385 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    It was good to see the old F4's😊

    • @george-ev1dq
      @george-ev1dq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great old monster of a bird, still in use with a couple of countries I believe

    • @ronjones9447
      @ronjones9447 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      My dad worked at McDonald Douglas in St. Louis where they built the F4 and F15s he loved them both

    • @jameswhitman8710
      @jameswhitman8710 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Use to be a jet mech and worked on A LOT of F-4’s while stationed in Guam. Good ole P&W j-79’s. If my memory serves me correct, same engine as on the B-52’s and even the f-111.
      Loved the f-4

    • @jameswhitman8710
      @jameswhitman8710 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All there doing is to study our response time and methods.(opinion)

    • @ronjones9447
      @ronjones9447 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jameswhitman8710 it’s left over from the Cold War, we watch them they watch us

  • @danfrakes5871
    @danfrakes5871 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Unless its a weather baloon. Then we protect them till they get all pictures they need.

  • @ASDasdSDsadASD-nc7lf
    @ASDasdSDsadASD-nc7lf 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Huh, it went exactly the way you think. They fired 5 missiles at it and atomized it, then pretended they did nothing at all.

  • @mikemonroe6086
    @mikemonroe6086 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    On the USS ENTERPRISE in 78 there Bear was allowed 5 miles from ship. At high altitude 5 miles is squat . We're defending freedom and their not. Let them swim

  • @manontondalan9941
    @manontondalan9941 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    they do that all the time we were patrolling north of
    japan close to vladivostok.... they even drop concussion bombs.

  • @johnjacobs1625
    @johnjacobs1625 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Russians never got within 100 miles of the carrier back in the 70s without an ESCORT!! JJ USS America & USS IKE!

  • @jhglaze
    @jhglaze 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I think the answer is both areas need to be patrolled so of course there is a bit of Sabre rattling which increases the possibility of something happening in the way of escalation but that’s the nature of the business.

    • @kenster865
      @kenster865 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well put. I just find the opportunities for mis-interpretations these intentional close encounters present to be unjustifiable on BOTH sides. One screw-up and we could be looking at a nuclear exchange. As the world situation intensifies, it's not wise, no, not one bit..

  • @LittoralPinniped
    @LittoralPinniped 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    In the 70's U.S. Navy ships were routinely overflown and have been ever since. I was on a carrier once that was overflown by a "Bear-Delta." This was shortly after the end of Vietnam conflict and seemed rather routine!

  • @williamrendall134
    @williamrendall134 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a good report and piece is all ways the first thing thanks.

  • @denniskee
    @denniskee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This incident happened at the International water, both site must exercise mutual respect and not to cause any harm to each other, and restrain any use of force!

  • @amiganer681130
    @amiganer681130 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Is there a minimum distance that has to be respectet by both parties? In internationa waters all have right to be there.

  • @John-gr5tx
    @John-gr5tx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The immediate reaction of the crew is to crap their pants when the rockets hit and yell histerically "that fighter is a mig!"

  • @leondillon8723
    @leondillon8723 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    7:31)What would happen if a jet broke the sound barrier passing over the dome?

    • @Triggernlfrl
      @Triggernlfrl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The jet would go faster than sound.

  • @josephethiopia9884
    @josephethiopia9884 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You don’t need World War III this is my message
    🇺🇸🙏🇺🇸🙏❤️

  • @christinavillanueva5254
    @christinavillanueva5254 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dios Bendiga USA🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸US Navy Eisenhower ❤️❤️

  • @bouncerslabrealnature9143
    @bouncerslabrealnature9143 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank goodness I've seen enough of this in real time on the USS Independence CV 62 in the old days 😂😂

  • @user-tl2xh5ft3s
    @user-tl2xh5ft3s 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we already know who the most powerful military in the world is.... Russia would be crazy to do anything. peace to all 💪🇺🇲

  • @stephen3727
    @stephen3727 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Peace through strength

  • @robertcox5896
    @robertcox5896 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Russians are just like the United States. They have the same wants and needs. There must be mutual respect between the two nations to avoid conflict.

  • @sparc77
    @sparc77 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back in the 80s, we (B52G) occasionally were shadowed by Soviet interceptors. On one such occasion it was a pair of MiG23s. Our copilot, in a gesture of humor, held a centerfold up against the window. The Flogger rolled over and flew next to us inverted. We didn't understand until the copilot realized he had the centerfold upside down. I'm pretty sure the Soviet pilot was too far away to make out any details, but he knew what it was and was probably laughing as we parted ways.
    It just goes to show that politics aside, we were pretty much cut from the same cloth.

  • @carlm.m.5470
    @carlm.m.5470 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The US is owned and controlled by centralized banking and the few families that own the centralized banks; Russia is not. When you look at what the US and the world call enemies of the US and the West, you'll see that the countries all fall in to 2 distinct categories, those with a centralized bank (The US, NATO countries, and almost the rest of the world) and those that do not want the illegal printing, debt scams, and loss of political control that come with having a privately owned bank print your country's currency (Russia, Venezuela, Syria, Iran, N. Korea, Iceland). The owners of the centralized banks in each country they have been installed can print whatever they want for themselves to be used for whatever they want. The first purchase is always the politicians necessary to insulate themselves from being thrown out of the country. The slow game is that they rent the currency to the host country for a fee at compound interest. Eventually the host country owes everything and every asset to the bank. The US fought the Revolutionary War to get out from under the same people responsible for this and again in the War of 1812. Eventually, a Founding Father of the US still friendly with the English Crown permitted the installation of a centralized bank and it wreaked havoc quickly and to the bone. President Andrew Jackson was finally able to break up the power structure and end the centralized bank. It had always been the goal of the English Crown to place the United American colonies back under the control of the English Empire. In 1913 they finally succeeded with the creation of the Federal Reserve. And from that moment on, the US has never been governed by the people.
    Russia wants to govern Russia for the people of Russia, not the few families that own most of the world. Those families, also known as the top 1% of the wealthiest top 1% do not want the planet to be God's playground for God's Children, they want everything edited to operate for a different soul,; editing Man; editing Man's relationship with God, changing the Earth permanently, subduing Nature or getting rid of it, instead of being Stewards of God's Earth.
    Look at what the US really has dome lately, and ask if this country is being managed for the health and betterment of the citizens of the US and our neighbors? The answer is the same regardless of your politics, because it is not being run by diplomats and experienced businessmen. The US has been hijacked long ago and is operating for thieves and murderers, and that is why their actions when really looked at are far different from the names given to their movements. The 'Patriot Act' , when read reveals itself to be the most unpatriotic set of laws in US history.
    Don't let them get away with this any longer; start learning and talking about centralized banking and what it does, for who it works, and why it would ever be considered.
    And remember, Russia is fighting against bankers, not against US citizens.

  • @stonecoldcowboy1817
    @stonecoldcowboy1817 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    @navyproductions I am, what you would call, a Jarhead but even I will say, after watching this video, Go Navy!!! The way I was taught in Boot back in the early '80's, the Navy is part of the Corps anyway! LOL

  • @Chris_at_Home
    @Chris_at_Home 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I went on some patrols in a P-3 50 years ago and we flew around USSR ships some. Our cameras would be running and their guns would track us. Some of the guys on the deck would wave. We used to kid around saying it wouldn’t be a good time to open the bomb bay.

    • @jimtownsend7899
      @jimtownsend7899 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When we were rigging the Soviets, it was common to have guns tracking us, and them shooting flares "in our general direction". Oranges from box lunches could mysteriously fall from free fall chutes during on-top shots. We never did figure out how that occurred.

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jimtownsend7899 We came across two Soviet subs tied to a tender while transiting the Med. We descended rapidly and dropped a flare on the bubbles of one of the subs getting underway. The tender lowered a lifeboat and went to retrieve the flare. It was fun to watch.

  • @stevenewdell3824
    @stevenewdell3824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good report, thanks

  • @josvandencamp8441
    @josvandencamp8441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where did this occur?

  • @moisesrodriguez-sanchez638
    @moisesrodriguez-sanchez638 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    All this power and advanced technology seems ineffective against low tec HOUTI missiles.

  • @brunonikodemski2420
    @brunonikodemski2420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The US Navy, just like the US Army, is a decade behind the curve about modern warfare. Just like a tank, any ship or carrier is a "sitting duck" to any suicidal weapon, of sufficient size. We designed tanks and apc's and these are easily destroyed by 2kg and 6kg rounds in certain places. Any aircraft carrier has three obvious weaknesses, with the obvious one at the base of the control tower. Any severance of the communications to the rest of the ship, renders it unable to sense or see strategic incoming weapons. The crew can still run the ship, via portable radios and cellphones, just like similar examples in WW2, but that process has not been trained for, not thought out, and probably impossible for a modern crew to be able to perform safely, without causing more damage. Once the carrier is blind, all the other processes become difficult, if not impossible. If other ships cluster around to protect it, they become a dense-pack of targets, worthy of another suicidal strike. Terrorists and Russians and Others have already used these tactics at many global places. An Assault-Breaker type of missile can launch 30+drones, which if emplaces on the deck of an active carrier, would essentially enflame the entire stored aircraft area of the deck, eliminate the deck crew, and probably cause random explosions of mounted weapons. This technology is already being investigated for real, and seen in gaming videos. Ukrainians are using duct-taped weapons on drones, to take hard-armor vehicles, including M1s, M2s, LAVs, Strykers, etc, etc. Wait until the Navy learns about underwater drones. They will be shocked, just shocked, Just like in the movie, to learn that there are unobservable things loosely floating beneath them.

  • @pokojoe9741
    @pokojoe9741 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice video, but could have all been said in 5 minutes without being so redundent.

  • @markjenner7199
    @markjenner7199 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If the Russians keep pushing the boundary,and if you do nothing it's a sign of weakness

    • @johnhopkins6260
      @johnhopkins6260 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ...or Confidence. (if you can capture it on a cell phone, it's as good as shredded) aka "maybe it's best you just go home"

    • @denisekennedy3099
      @denisekennedy3099 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@johnhopkins6260 Completely agree. It’s a mature and restrained response when they are tweaking your tail…

    • @MarikaRichter
      @MarikaRichter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Completely agree.

  • @WilBegaye
    @WilBegaye 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AMUN BABY
    PROUD TO BE A GOD-FEARING NATIVE AMERICAN
    OFF TO THE FUTURE WE GO!

  • @graydonwilson5550
    @graydonwilson5550 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There sure is a lot of repetition in this video, saying several of the same statements several times each. Tiresome.

  • @ruthretzke8785
    @ruthretzke8785 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ha! No military jets for me. I love my bi-planes! However, I'll throw a nickel on the ground for all of you MARVELOUS and BRAVE military pilots! I still believe the saying about "their are old pilots and bold pilots, but no old bold old pilots". Respect to all of you!

    • @yperkin1016
      @yperkin1016 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😮😊

  • @dustinadamson833
    @dustinadamson833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr Tuvok, activate the Photonic Cannon! 😄

  • @shawnmurphy6811
    @shawnmurphy6811 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What I don’t understand is why they Let a spy plane any plane for that matter get so close

  • @Jaime-u5m
    @Jaime-u5m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If we survive this stage of our collective infancy; 50,000+ years from now future generations will poke holes at our current stupidity. If, we survive ourselves!

  • @craigchabot3002
    @craigchabot3002 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If the Russians had been more aggressive then it would be splash one spy plane

  • @mrgfix
    @mrgfix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This has been and will continue be a constant activity for many years. USS Coral Sea, CV-43. The Russian Bear (TU-95) came to visit us during the mid 70's. They would have several F-4's ready to go at any time.

    • @randywilliams568
      @randywilliams568 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was on uss coral sea in 77 west pac .I was with vf191.I also have seen the Russian bear a couple of times on the flight deck

    • @skipperclinton1087
      @skipperclinton1087 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There is always a CAP somewhere not too far away from its "home". The "intercept" launch is just for show.

    • @mrgfix
      @mrgfix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@randywilliams568 I was in Operations department on the 75 and 77 west pac.

  • @uzairisaidin3674
    @uzairisaidin3674 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sitting DUCK.....against RUSSIA's HYPERSONIC MISSILES....!!!!!!
    ..R.I.P
    .

  • @michiganprospector8209
    @michiganprospector8209 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whoever is responsible for allowing potential disaster to fly over a USA aircraft carrier should be court martialed.

  • @artpro5930
    @artpro5930 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How many types of jets are shown in the stock footage? I get that there is no actual footage of this encounter, but can we not change the American jet or the Russian spy plane with every cut?

  • @BrentCaddy
    @BrentCaddy หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any conflict is always a aggressive encounter which is not good for both sides unless you have a electro magnetic fields and then you know that everyone is on thin ice unless you have a reverberation and you are sorted out no survivers

  • @tumbleweed996
    @tumbleweed996 หลายเดือนก่อน

    did anyone notice that the russian aircraft troops inside the aircraft were wearing heavy coats, like it's gotta be freaking cold inside that airplane

  • @ancientgamer3645
    @ancientgamer3645 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Russia could save a lot of money by just watching videos on TH-cam.

  • @kempersmith6462
    @kempersmith6462 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It depends on the current level of tension between the powers as wo what might happen when contact is made.

  • @Pfrazier43
    @Pfrazier43 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It is lost to some that these crews are made up of mostly college age men and women. They are given charge of a billion dollar Air Craft Carrier, and sail all over the globe doing their job so we go to sleep each night with narry a thought about the, "games," going on around us. These young people deserve our greatest respect, for keeping us safe, and for the great care they😊 show, for the billions of dollars worth of assets, they are intrusted with every day.

  • @JosephGelis
    @JosephGelis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, we still have F-4s active in the Fleet (5:35)?

  • @margaretlouiseable
    @margaretlouiseable 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cat and mouse. Red October. Watch the water. Our precious military is all over our current situation.

  • @gordy7877
    @gordy7877 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I believe that's called saber rattling, other wise known as harrassment...😂

  • @Angelo-h1h
    @Angelo-h1h 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Putin is such a Troublemaker!!

  • @pallidustigris
    @pallidustigris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's dangerous but both sides are trained, qualified, and current on their respective missions. Either side don't want to ignite a deadly war no one wants. Documented history shows these close encounters have taken place for decades. As technology advances, rules and procedures are updated and or implemented to avoid a tragic mistake. Both sides have humans involved and as long as that is a case, there is always an element of cool minds under stress. Don't know how future drones and smart weapons will react to a perceived hostile act by its integrated software and hardware, but I am confident there will always be a watchful human element to pull the plug on the system if required.

  • @jacobgang1400
    @jacobgang1400 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The game of cat of mouse can eventually result in accidental conflict with the danger of expanding.

  • @rossnolan2883
    @rossnolan2883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Sound the sirens 🚨

    • @Craft-oh7uv
      @Craft-oh7uv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dose Russia have computers ?

    • @rossnolan2883
      @rossnolan2883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Craft-oh7uv yes that is how they are able to locate army ships it’s intolerable

  • @dianeadkins1281
    @dianeadkins1281 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If this is true HOW did they get this close to our shore? Our military is supposed to know and prevent any potential threat

  • @stepheng1138
    @stepheng1138 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    back when i was in, this would have never happened. they got within a certain distance they would be ordered to turn away. if they don't the alert fighters would have been launched and they would have escorted them out our area

  • @jeffcombest6466
    @jeffcombest6466 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can hear the senior Captain launch the emergency fighter jet right now to not fire until fire upon sounds familiar

  • @DarylVogel
    @DarylVogel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    US Navy; born to be on high alert...

  • @syedGA
    @syedGA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    To both the countries if u can't beat them join them

  • @JimDonofrio-q3u
    @JimDonofrio-q3u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would have never been allowed to get that close

  • @jorg8714
    @jorg8714 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ... tut mir leid, aber ich möchte MIT GLIED bleiben.
    Deshalb behalte ich ES und geb's nicht weg ....

  • @yoongsunloh7054
    @yoongsunloh7054 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How to disarm the signalling receptor without flying to encounter the encounter technology 😅

  • @marlongoodwin5015
    @marlongoodwin5015 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is it that our military is told to stand down while in danger

  • @NancyJ238
    @NancyJ238 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Childs rhyme: Little Miss Muffet sat on her tuffet..along came a spider...and scared Miss Muffet away. Miss Muffet is the "President" of the United States. Don't we all just feel so safe 🙄

  • @stephentaylor280
    @stephentaylor280 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I was in the Navy fly over by Russians was another normal day at sea in the North Atlantic. One Russian aircraft flew low over our fantail and ended up hitting the water and crashing. There is a video of this incident on youtube.

  • @sailingcapedissappointment2012
    @sailingcapedissappointment2012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should know how the reality of a nuclear WWIII is not going to be permitted and I say this based on my own observations as I have been doing Astral Travel since I was a kid and one day in 1984 I went to the moon and I saw objects there and wanted to explore them but as I was reaching the surface I spotted two little ET's who were busy working on something and they dropped what they were doing and had started working thier way over to me . We communicated telepathically and they told me I should not be there , these two little guys were around four feet tall but they wern't quite like everyone usually describes them as they didn't have large heads with slanted eyes however thier eyes were black but they weren't quite as large as everyone describes them either also they looked exactly alike . This out of body ended in sleep paralysis and I was laying on my bed while the glow of the moon was still eminating from behind me on about the room and I can't turn my head to see why . As I lay there unable to even move a finger I can hear high speed computer like sounds operating at a high rate of speed that eventually fade away as I watch the sun come up the next day and on in to the day until around noon . This was my second sleep paralysis , something I had not encountered in all the times I have been out of body . Alien beings are real and with that in mind it should not require a doctorate or achievement of tenure to determine that all out nuclear war will not be permitted . The usuall skirmishes may not fit the same urgency however one must take note that higher entities are not subject to the linear affects of time here on earth as they exsist outside this construct and they have a clear understanding of what will exist in what we percive as the future ....

  • @MartyDowd
    @MartyDowd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pretty Big Aircraft, especially for A "Spy Plane". FGS, it's as big as a C-5!

  • @ukmkotabandung3609
    @ukmkotabandung3609 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pesawat AS tidak akan pernah berani menembak dahulu pesawat militer Rusia 😊

  • @KaskKreem
    @KaskKreem 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This happened, they checked other out n went their separate ways.

  • @jimsavely1104
    @jimsavely1104 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think we are ok as long as there is not a rouge madman to set things in motion. We did a tour in the Black Sea back in the early 80's. Soviet Union ships following our every move. We had 2 US ships. When we refueled out at sea we would pull up along side the supply ship. We watched the Soviets refuel and the supply ship was in front of the ship receiving fuel. We were off the coast of Libya when the 2 migs were shot down. This was the same tour after the mig incident we headed to the Black Sea. We were halfway back across the Atlantic heading home when we had to turn around and head back to the Med. This after the president of Egypt was assassinated.

  • @mustafamusa9230
    @mustafamusa9230 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    War

  • @michaelburns8883
    @michaelburns8883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whenever we encountered Russian ships at sea they always had their missiles pointing at us.

  • @barryking5993
    @barryking5993 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It happens every day of the week 365 days a year

  • @USNMMCret
    @USNMMCret 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Capt Teets lol. It’s the little things.

  • @JaimePimentel-wl1fp
    @JaimePimentel-wl1fp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is always the risk of conflit.

  • @willieJ2129
    @willieJ2129 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why was the Russian aircraft allowed so close?🤔

  • @tightwill
    @tightwill 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think it can escalate if some one makes a mistake.

  • @carlchristensen8157
    @carlchristensen8157 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Peace through Superior Firepower

  • @leonsperspicacity.
    @leonsperspicacity. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The response to the scenario, what would happen if any nation or military powers showed escalated aggression is verry simple. We the citizens of the U.S.A. spend our tax money on our military forces more than any other nation with the standing order to defend our nation and assets at any cost. We don't have a universal healthcare system because we as a people would rather our money be spent mostly on national defence, quick and concise response and protection of our allies and assets. We remain calm and stoic, taking escalated aggression and all threats with severe training in vigilance and analytics. We take into account the necessity to de-escalate conflict any time is is possible however when no peaceful resolution is available to us, our forces will not hesitate to resolve the conflict with total commitment and obliteration. it is simply in our nature if no peaceful resolution available, to give all we are to a swift and violent conclusion.

  • @Hardrock1a
    @Hardrock1a 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russian Bears have flown over battle groups forever. We picked them up just after they took off from Ho Chi Min City and tracked them all the way.

  • @simonrobins4316
    @simonrobins4316 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the game of intel gathering is always on going - an example being, when a US carrier gets upgraded, leaked intel from port, from congress funding discussions, etc, tell the Russians something new is coming into service on that carrier group - so they want to gather more intel on that group - lets say the carrier group has upgraded radar, then the Russians will sweep in close to detect emissions in spectrum of frequencies - then they compare to what was done before and then guage the difference - if its a new a/c (say the F35) they want to see how long it takes to get up into the air, what it emits when tracking for them - the Russians try to gather as much as possible
    the US, the UK, France, almost all NATO nations with force projection capabilities and then intel gathering capabilities, do exactly the same - the side effect of having some novel capability, is that at some point you will use it and someone will try to gather intel on it
    its just that the Russians want to get in the face of anybody trying to gather intel on them - some say its unprofessional in how they try to warn others off, which is somewhat true - which is strange as its puts a flight crew in danger (in this case), something most NATO nations try to avoid, but Russians seem to want to constantly test and challenge
    the issue here being, what ever we do to one of their assets, the other side will do back at some point - so taking out a passive-threat out could cause things to escalate