I read your background. Which makes the inaccuracies in your video that much more confusing. Contact me so I can educate you. Former 11F out of Spang, Germany here.
It's funny how all this criticism of the F-35 appeared right AFTER Israel used F-35's to attack Iran and the world learned that F-35's were INVISIBLE to Russia's S-400 anti-aircraft radar system.
That was a good review. But, I think subtitles would be better. That way people get to learn about the subject, and some French. What is with the F35? It represents the future, I think. People see a technology transition happening with drone warfare, and the future F35 is designed to accommodate that, perhaps even being a platform to develop a sixth generation fighter, which is of course a kind of mobile advanced drone control station. But all this is future technology. In the meantime, if you want something effective get the F15 EX, or the Rafael, as you say. However, who can afford both? Having to choose one or the other is a ridiculous situation, from a tactical standpoint, so we must imagine that in a total war scenario, which somehow doesn't involve nuclear Armageddon, the West on a war economy will provide as many 4th generation fighters to back up the F35s as is needed. We should imagine this is the promise Joe might have made. In any case, the F35 is still an experiment, and it will eventually become what we in the West hope it to be, given time and investment. And considering the Chinese investment in this kind of platform, can Europe afford not to be involved at the ground level?
Pierre Sprey wasn't the "chief designer" of the F-16, actually he wasn't involved in the F-16 design at all - he was a member of the team that did calculations for maneuverability requirements for the F-16. His criticism of the F-35 is based on ideas from the 60s and 70s which were outdated even by the time the F-16 was being designed, let alone the F-35. He didn't make any tangible contribution to aircraft design, he only became famous because his nonsensical talking points were picked up and parroted by anti-western propaganda media.
Excellent --- DISINFORMATION!!
🤣😂 He swings, He misses! Sub title is spot on though.
I read your background. Which makes the inaccuracies in your video that much more confusing. Contact me so I can educate you.
Former 11F out of Spang, Germany here.
The guy in this video doesn’t have a clue about modern fighter jet.
Don’t let 🇺🇸screw you over , as we were. Mike 🇦🇺
It's funny how all this criticism of the F-35 appeared right AFTER Israel used F-35's to attack Iran and the world learned that F-35's were INVISIBLE to Russia's S-400 anti-aircraft radar system.
Still believing everything you read on the internet huh?
All BS talk
That was a good review. But, I think subtitles would be better. That way people get to learn about the subject, and some French. What is with the F35? It represents the future, I think. People see a technology transition happening with drone warfare, and the future F35 is designed to accommodate that, perhaps even being a platform to develop a sixth generation fighter, which is of course a kind of mobile advanced drone control station. But all this is future technology. In the meantime, if you want something effective get the F15 EX, or the Rafael, as you say. However, who can afford both? Having to choose one or the other is a ridiculous situation, from a tactical standpoint, so we must imagine that in a total war scenario, which somehow doesn't involve nuclear Armageddon, the West on a war economy will provide as many 4th generation fighters to back up the F35s as is needed. We should imagine this is the promise Joe might have made. In any case, the F35 is still an experiment, and it will eventually become what we in the West hope it to be, given time and investment. And considering the Chinese investment in this kind of platform, can Europe afford not to be involved at the ground level?
Qui parle? C'est Xavier? Si oui, tres bonne prononciation en anglais!
Belgium cancelled F35; yet Singapore added more F35s. The chief engineer of F16, Pierre, criticized the F35, will lose in dogfight against Mig 21.
Pierre Sprey wasn't the "chief designer" of the F-16, actually he wasn't involved in the F-16 design at all - he was a member of the team that did calculations for maneuverability requirements for the F-16. His criticism of the F-35 is based on ideas from the 60s and 70s which were outdated even by the time the F-16 was being designed, let alone the F-35. He didn't make any tangible contribution to aircraft design, he only became famous because his nonsensical talking points were picked up and parroted by anti-western propaganda media.
Pas bon le son là vieux!
Random guy thinks he knows better than the free worlds experts.
Ahh yes, another misinformative video sponsored by Russia.
Internet referencing, Yes Sir
Propaganda badly dubbed and stupid numbers meaning nothing hahaha
i smell bullshit💩💩
The Guy is an ex military pilot ...så he knows what is he tallking about
No he does not he is sadly misinformed