Lol - this video cracks me up. He stated lots of elite athletes and how they move in their sport, and those athletes spend time in the weight room, but none of them do “functional patterns” (not that I know of” yet have exceptional, sought after, ways to move… does anyone else not see the problem here?
The movements actually do seem very useful, but you're 100% right for noticing that. I just finished explaining to someone in a comment how Usain Bolt, Asafa Powell, Yohan Blake, Tyson Gay all squatted 400 - 450+. They were certainly doing unilateral work with them l, but they were still doin em. I'd go further to say that most sprinters running sub 10 can probably squat a minimal 350 to 400 and utilize the exercise in training. Varying slight from 1/4 squats all the way to full.
The video says "using these elite athletes as a reference point not the end product" - they have accomplished the highest feat of performance without FP, so the original comment is correct in pointing out the irony odf this preachy marketing. The visuals of FP being the cybertruck vs the horse only prooves that FP is trying to establish their credibility through marketing, which makes FP a product and nothing else.
exactly, and they state that the scienfic world is involved in some exercise conspiracy to keep people injured. Sports teams exclusively try to keep their athletes on the pitch. Why haven't they jumped on FP that claims they do this. Naudi, even though his a bit insane, has found a way to market to the fringes who are as mentally challenged as he is and is making bank. That's what FP is successful at.
Great video and explanation. It has totally changed my mindset from how I used to train to becoming more functional with my movements that was certainly being degraded from my old ways with traditional training, especially at my age 65. Still a long way to go, but loving it. Thank you..
I went to the website. I want to sign up for an online lecture. But I don't speak English. Can I take a lecture? Are subtitles in Korean? What program should I take if I can solve my back pain?
I buy into all of the FP approach, just not so much in the MFR, aka Foam rolling or trigger point release. There is lacking evidence that it helps, also my own experience. It only helps for a very short time afterwards.
Ok how do I start, there is no gym where I live, in the middle of nowhere, not to mention an FP training gym. I have a space at my house but no idea how to begin w no one to assess my crookedness.😬
You have to start buy giving them your money then they’ll tell you what to do. An unproven theory that goes against what’s known to work. There you have it.
Why did you stop these videos Mike? Pretty informative and useful despite not appealing to the masses (likely presentation style). Even though they can be long I always come back for them 💪🏼
Great explanation here, FP is far superior to traditional/conventional training approaches. It has to far taken me out of a great deal of pain and helped me build more muscle mass than any previous method I tried. With other approaches in the past, all I ever saw in the realm of results was joint pain and a stagnant physique.
Hello Sir, I recently heard about you that you have been helping many people recover from injuries…I am a student and plays cricket and I have been suffering from sciatica pain for few years…Sir , please can you help me with some exercise or stuff…coz I have to sit on desk for long hours to study…sometime pain is less and sometime pain is unbearable …So plz kindly help me🙏🏻🙏🏻
@@Legolas3300 Non disclosure agreement. They make everyone sign one. It's nothing ground breaking at all. They make up disfunctions and claim to solve them. It's just exercise, changing your diet and sleeping.
Great summarization, thank you for this video. This is a great way to introduce people to Functional Patterns. Building muscle around efficient pain-free movement, eliminating waste..smh nothing but 💰💰💰
Great video until it compared themselves to other exercise modalities… there is never a superior training methodology or a “one size fits all”…. it’s such a irresponsible perspective and discredits your work and services
You realize that early man maybe lived to 30 and 50 was really old. We have evolved past this to live much longer. I understand that these things are important but so is a strong core and muscle mass. Also we developed projectile weapons pretty fast because throwing was not as effective. Also I do believe we had to lift heavy things to build shelter. I could go on and on about early man the stupidity of using them as your base line vs modern people living healthy active lives past let’s say 80 or 100 with good cognitive function as well. How about variations in a species. Spider monkeys vs gorilla chimps and orangutans etc. I believe you might be trying to improve one piece of the fitness puzzle but as for a complete one stop solution. I don’t think so. 4:26
I was a subscriber for a long time, the recent shorts I saw blew my mind! Instead of providing value, this channel is making shorts that suggest Kneesovertoesguy or yoga is hurtful or negative, deep squats are bad? I thought this was a joke, lost a subscriber for sure… 💩
So, you "observe the best athletes", all of whom didn't do functional patterns to become the best. Isn't the logical conclusion that FP isn't required at any level to be a "best athlete"? Naudi is always bring up Barry Sanders, a guy who has never done one minute of FP (and prob did heaps of training that Naudi would call bullshit), as the pinnacle of human movement...doesn't that also speak to the idea that FP isn't any sort of requirement for moving well and being an amazing athlete? Lebron James?? Naudi has shit all over his squat videos (which are horrible to be fair)! Now he's an example for you guys? That's rich. And what if those athletes trained with traditional weightlifting/powerlifting/bodybuilding protocols? Wouldn't that also falsify Naudi's central claims that all of those protocols are inferior to FP? For how could we look at the best athletes doing other training protocols and then say "FP, being totally unrepresented in these athletes, is how one moves like the best athletes"? FP has literally put up not one olympian or top-level athlete ever. Dake was a beast before FP. FP didn't make him who he is...that was later in his career. But there is not one, from-the-ground-up-athlete, that's exclusively done FP their entire training career that's become an elite level athlete. Yet we're to believe that it's the best way to move like an athlete?
If average joes are doing traditional lifting, how come they’re not moving like Sanders, Bolt, etc? Never have there been results of structural changes from traditional lifting in relation to optimizing human movement.
@@mainsourcery yeah good point. Original comment has a lot of fallacies in it. The athletes above are great because of how they move not how they train. The traditional training methods fail so many more times than they succeed
Dake was about to have to take an early retirement before FP. His body was broken. It’s clear to see him overcome that after starting FP and to see his wrestling greatly improve as a result
@@jeffharris8617 yup. He also forgot to mention that these elite athletes are genetically gifted and succeed DESPITE the dysfunctional s&c/rehab protocols they’re told to adhere to. If FP is altering the way people, especially those who are not genetically gifted & have bad neurological conditions, adapt to stress, gravity & their environment, imagine what FP would do for an elite athlete. But FP prides itself on helping the less fortunate, while the rest of the industry harps on athletes who are already genetically gifted.
Almost all pro athletes are people who naturally were able to move well, and this is in spite of doing traditional lifting, not because of it. If traditional lifting made them move that way, we would see traditional lifting making average joes move better, but it's not. Also, what you're saying doesn't make any sense. Even if pro athletes were able to be pros without the use of FP, that doesn't mean people don't stand to benefit from using FP. Pro athletes got to where they are mostly due to a natural ability. So yeah you dont need FP to be a pro, but that's only if you're already one of the top percentiles of genetically gifted athletes. Most people do not have that natural ability. So for most people, they need FP to improve their athleticism. And Dake was injured and about to retire before he started FP. FP prevented him from retiring, changed his game completely, he became better than he was before, and went to win world champions and olympic medals after. Also other pro athletes benefitted from FP, like Johnny Eblen who became Bellator world champion. Either way, athletes dont matter because people in way worse situations are able to benefit tremendously from FP, like regular joes, old people, and people with neurodegenerative diseases. So if they're getting benefit, it's obvious that athletes will benefit.
That usually means you’re mad & offended by FP’s position when it comes to how the human body should be conditioned, because you can’t argue the points made.
It’s a cult that requires you to sign nda’s before doing anything, you need to allow your social media to be accessed by people in the organization and repost/comment on all the fp social media
@@OBMATT is every company that requires an NDA a cult to you? And what is one destructive thing about the FP system that makes it a “cult”? Have you seen the results it showcases, then compare it to the non-results of the rest of the industry?
@@mainsourcery ah a fp boy. Does your MD make you sign an NDA prior to seeing them? Or how about a massage therapist? PT? Chiro? No. Naudi also requires that you follow everything he says and if you disagree you’re out. Yep, plenty of people have stories how they questioned him and he booted them. They require you to also change your instagram handle to their approved way along with giving them access. As for the “result”, they aren’t any different than what people get when they start exercising and changing their diets. They just cherry pick what to show. If it’s so great, why won’t any of your fp people actually do a study comparing it to these other methods? Oh that’s right, you’re afraid it will show that it’s no different than anything else
@@OBMATT continual observation of natural phenomena, constantly testing, producing 10k+ results worldwide over a 10+ year span. Does this not seem “scientific” to you. If not please elaborate.
@@ampjs1 for the number of people you guys claim does fp, those numbers are not impressive. The “results” are no different than what personal trainers show in their before and after photos. Heck, those scam weight loss pills show “results” as well. How about to be scientific you guys actually show it in research? Compare people doing fp to a group doing sham fp. Blind the participants and see the outcomes. I know, you’ve got the canned fp response on why research isn’t worth jt
Lol - this video cracks me up. He stated lots of elite athletes and how they move in their sport, and those athletes spend time in the weight room, but none of them do “functional patterns” (not that I know of” yet have exceptional, sought after, ways to move… does anyone else not see the problem here?
They stay in their echo chamber
The movements actually do seem very useful, but you're 100% right for noticing that. I just finished explaining to someone in a comment how Usain Bolt, Asafa Powell, Yohan Blake, Tyson Gay all squatted 400 - 450+. They were certainly doing unilateral work with them l, but they were still doin em. I'd go further to say that most sprinters running sub 10 can probably squat a minimal 350 to 400 and utilize the exercise in training. Varying slight from 1/4 squats all the way to full.
You're completely missing the point. Watch the video again.
The video says "using these elite athletes as a reference point not the end product" - they have accomplished the highest feat of performance without FP, so the original comment is correct in pointing out the irony odf this preachy marketing. The visuals of FP being the cybertruck vs the horse only prooves that FP is trying to establish their credibility through marketing, which makes FP a product and nothing else.
exactly, and they state that the scienfic world is involved in some exercise conspiracy to keep people injured. Sports teams exclusively try to keep their athletes on the pitch. Why haven't they jumped on FP that claims they do this.
Naudi, even though his a bit insane, has found a way to market to the fringes who are as mentally challenged as he is and is making bank. That's what FP is successful at.
Awesome video Mike
Excellent breakdown and explanation that I will surely give to all my clients
Great video and explanation. It has totally changed my mindset from how I used to train to becoming more functional with my movements that was certainly being degraded from my old ways with traditional training, especially at my age 65. Still a long way to go, but loving it. Thank you..
Hello, what are your concerns with swimming?
I went to the website. I want to sign up for an online lecture. But I don't speak English. Can I take a lecture? Are subtitles in Korean? What program should I take if I can solve my back pain?
How can FP help with ACL reconstruction rehab?
No
What do you mean by "competency" as opposed to "competence?"
Are there any scientific studies to back up FP claims ?
no
No, they refuse to do any
@@Matt_thePT Cuz they absolutely have no idea what Science is. FP is a cult.
Thank you Mike for the video. Very well put together. I'll be sharing this consistently moving forward!
is getting a tan mandatory?
I buy into all of the FP approach, just not so much in the MFR, aka Foam rolling or trigger point release. There is lacking evidence that it helps, also my own experience. It only helps for a very short time afterwards.
I love this! So useful, you tha man Mike!
Ok how do I start, there is no gym where I live, in the middle of nowhere, not to mention an FP training gym. I have a space at my house but no idea how to begin w no one to assess my crookedness.😬
You need to be initiated into their religion via their 10 week program. Careful though.
You have to start buy giving them your money then they’ll tell you what to do. An unproven theory that goes against what’s known to work. There you have it.
PRI Technique and Functional Patterns are Truly life saving I love them both
Why did you stop these videos Mike?
Pretty informative and useful despite not appealing to the masses (likely presentation style). Even though they can be long I always come back for them 💪🏼
Nice description. FP takes an engineering approach to the human body, and produces great results using very simple tools.
Great explanation Mike. Thank you!
Great explanation here, FP is far superior to traditional/conventional training approaches. It has to far taken me out of a great deal of pain and helped me build more muscle mass than any previous method I tried. With other approaches in the past, all I ever saw in the realm of results was joint pain and a stagnant physique.
Hello Sir, I recently heard about you that you have been helping many people recover from injuries…I am a student and plays cricket and I have been suffering from sciatica pain for few years…Sir , please can you help me with some exercise or stuff…coz I have to sit on desk for long hours to study…sometime pain is less and sometime pain is unbearable …So plz kindly help me🙏🏻🙏🏻
They will force you to buy the course and have you sign an NDA
@@OBMATT whats NDA?
@@Legolas3300 Non disclosure agreement. They make everyone sign one. It's nothing ground breaking at all. They make up disfunctions and claim to solve them. It's just exercise, changing your diet and sleeping.
NDA: Non Disclaimer Agreement
So what u mean? They scam?
Great video Mike and FP 🔥
Thank you Mike! Great stuff
Great video and explanation, The blurb is useful 😅
Great explanation with helpful visuals, thanks Mike!
Awesome video, helps a lot🙌
Functional Patterns is correct.
Thank you for making this video! I will definetly share this.
Legit💥💥💥
Awesome summary 👏
Great video to help us making people understand what is Functional Patterns Training System. Thank you for al the amazing video series. 🙏🏾🤙🏾💪🏾🔥🦍🚀
Resultados fantásticos, gostaria muito de praticar e ver a capacidade que meu corpo tem👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Pratique e serás surpreendida pelo metodo de treino e resultados.
When he said Cindy Mcloughlin, I heard the SPCA song. This is marketing version of Paul Chek, well big egos
Great summarization, thank you for this video. This is a great way to introduce people to Functional Patterns. Building muscle around efficient pain-free movement, eliminating waste..smh nothing but 💰💰💰
Great video until it compared themselves to other exercise modalities… there is never a superior training methodology or a “one size fits all”…. it’s such a irresponsible perspective and discredits your work and services
have you tried it?
They make up their claims and are scared to actually compare it against anything else
Yeah ofcourse you want everyone to get a participation trophy 😂
Who's here after Virendra Sehwag???
Me
You realize that early man maybe lived to 30 and 50 was really old. We have evolved past this to live much longer. I understand that these things are important but so is a strong core and muscle mass. Also we developed projectile weapons pretty fast because throwing was not as effective. Also I do believe we had to lift heavy things to build shelter. I could go on and on about early man the stupidity of using them as your base line vs modern people living healthy active lives past let’s say 80 or 100 with good cognitive function as well. How about variations in a species. Spider monkeys vs gorilla chimps and orangutans etc. I believe you might be trying to improve one piece of the fitness puzzle but as for a complete one stop solution. I don’t think so. 4:26
Is this safe for people with scoliosis?
Thanks Mike great explanation of the only system that works.
Great video 💪🏽💪🏽🔥
Excellent video Mike 🔥🔥🔥
At 4:31 I thought Naudi was wearing a hijab for a second LOL. Thanks for a great explanation Mike
❤❤❤❤
Superb explanation. 🔥
Well done, about as concise as you can get.
Nice video 🙏
I wish you could break it down so it is easily understandable for "normal folk". Too many anatomical and physiological terminology analogies
Great video Mike, awesome explanation thank you #fpallday
What happened to the functional pattern TH-cam feed? Last video posted 7 months ago
I was a subscriber for a long time, the recent shorts I saw blew my mind!
Instead of providing value, this channel is making shorts that suggest Kneesovertoesguy or yoga is hurtful or negative, deep squats are bad?
I thought this was a joke, lost a subscriber for sure… 💩
This seems like Mormonism lol
So, you "observe the best athletes", all of whom didn't do functional patterns to become the best. Isn't the logical conclusion that FP isn't required at any level to be a "best athlete"?
Naudi is always bring up Barry Sanders, a guy who has never done one minute of FP (and prob did heaps of training that Naudi would call bullshit), as the pinnacle of human movement...doesn't that also speak to the idea that FP isn't any sort of requirement for moving well and being an amazing athlete?
Lebron James?? Naudi has shit all over his squat videos (which are horrible to be fair)! Now he's an example for you guys? That's rich.
And what if those athletes trained with traditional weightlifting/powerlifting/bodybuilding protocols? Wouldn't that also falsify Naudi's central claims that all of those protocols are inferior to FP?
For how could we look at the best athletes doing other training protocols and then say "FP, being totally unrepresented in these athletes, is how one moves like the best athletes"?
FP has literally put up not one olympian or top-level athlete ever.
Dake was a beast before FP. FP didn't make him who he is...that was later in his career.
But there is not one, from-the-ground-up-athlete, that's exclusively done FP their entire training career that's become an elite level athlete.
Yet we're to believe that it's the best way to move like an athlete?
If average joes are doing traditional lifting, how come they’re not moving like Sanders, Bolt, etc? Never have there been results of structural changes from traditional lifting in relation to optimizing human movement.
@@mainsourcery yeah good point. Original comment has a lot of fallacies in it. The athletes above are great because of how they move not how they train. The traditional training methods fail so many more times than they succeed
Dake was about to have to take an early retirement before FP. His body was broken. It’s clear to see him overcome that after starting FP and to see his wrestling greatly improve as a result
@@jeffharris8617 yup. He also forgot to mention that these elite athletes are genetically gifted and succeed DESPITE the dysfunctional s&c/rehab protocols they’re told to adhere to. If FP is altering the way people, especially those who are not genetically gifted & have bad neurological conditions, adapt to stress, gravity & their environment, imagine what FP would do for an elite athlete. But FP prides itself on helping the less fortunate, while the rest of the industry harps on athletes who are already genetically gifted.
Almost all pro athletes are people who naturally were able to move well, and this is in spite of doing traditional lifting, not because of it. If traditional lifting made them move that way, we would see traditional lifting making average joes move better, but it's not.
Also, what you're saying doesn't make any sense. Even if pro athletes were able to be pros without the use of FP, that doesn't mean people don't stand to benefit from using FP. Pro athletes got to where they are mostly due to a natural ability. So yeah you dont need FP to be a pro, but that's only if you're already one of the top percentiles of genetically gifted athletes. Most people do not have that natural ability. So for most people, they need FP to improve their athleticism.
And Dake was injured and about to retire before he started FP. FP prevented him from retiring, changed his game completely, he became better than he was before, and went to win world champions and olympic medals after. Also other pro athletes benefitted from FP, like Johnny Eblen who became Bellator world champion. Either way, athletes dont matter because people in way worse situations are able to benefit tremendously from FP, like regular joes, old people, and people with neurodegenerative diseases. So if they're getting benefit, it's obvious that athletes will benefit.
Where does the man bun come into the picture?
Objective not subjective 🌎
its a cult.
That usually means you’re mad & offended by FP’s position when it comes to how the human body should be conditioned, because you can’t argue the points made.
@@mainsourcery I don't care about FP position, it's a cult.
It’s a cult that requires you to sign nda’s before doing anything, you need to allow your social media to be accessed by people in the organization and repost/comment on all the fp social media
@@OBMATT is every company that requires an NDA a cult to you? And what is one destructive thing about the FP system that makes it a “cult”? Have you seen the results it showcases, then compare it to the non-results of the rest of the industry?
@@mainsourcery ah a fp boy. Does your MD make you sign an NDA prior to seeing them? Or how about a massage therapist? PT? Chiro? No. Naudi also requires that you follow everything he says and if you disagree you’re out. Yep, plenty of people have stories how they questioned him and he booted them. They require you to also change your instagram handle to their approved way along with giving them access. As for the “result”, they aren’t any different than what people get when they start exercising and changing their diets. They just cherry pick what to show. If it’s so great, why won’t any of your fp people actually do a study comparing it to these other methods? Oh that’s right, you’re afraid it will show that it’s no different than anything else
Pseudoscience
Translation “science I don’t care to understand and have no coherent counter-argument against”
@@ampjs1 translation, it’s not based on any science and I blindly follow without looking at any actual research
@@OBMATT continual observation of natural phenomena, constantly testing, producing 10k+ results worldwide over a 10+ year span. Does this not seem “scientific” to you. If not please elaborate.
@@ampjs1 for the number of people you guys claim does fp, those numbers are not impressive. The “results” are no different than what personal trainers show in their before and after photos. Heck, those scam weight loss pills show “results” as well. How about to be scientific you guys actually show it in research? Compare people doing fp to a group doing sham fp. Blind the participants and see the outcomes. I know, you’ve got the canned fp response on why research isn’t worth jt
@@ampjs1 th-cam.com/video/06Y1d8tmljQ/w-d-xo.html
This is fearmongering and will lead some people to fear movement, leading to kinesiophobia and catastrophizing.
There are multiple flaws in this concept of training and exercise. Great marketing thats for sure....practicality......mehh im not so sure
What flaws? We’re open to hear your analysis. Unless that’s the extent of your rebuttal to everything we covered here.