ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2021
- Coming up are some crazy Soviet-era machines you won't believe exist!
Part 2: • Craziest Soviet Machin...
Suggest a topic here to be turned into a video: bit.ly/2kwqhuh
Subscribe for more! ► goo.gl/pgcoq1 ◄
Stay updated ► goo.gl/JyGcTt goo.gl/5c8dzr ◄
For copyright queries or general inquiries please get in touch: hello@beamazed.com
Legal Stuff.
Unless otherwise created by BeAmazed, licenses have been obtained for images/footage in the video from the following sources: pastebin.com/sDha7AGa
Part 2 here! th-cam.com/video/MBZVOJrhuHY/w-d-xo.html
only one like 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@wavevr who asked ok 🙄🙄
If the very first sentence was true, communism would have started the industrial revolution instead of freedom in the USA. Sorry,---it would not have happened with out the USA, and russia has been an impoverished citizenry while people in the USA flourished with their minds, and their freedom. "Be Amazed" at all the dysfunctional things a communist government makes,, (usual copies or given or taken.). We did it better when we were free to do so. Your programmers are going to be amazed all right.
This is bs garbage and hypocrisy advertising.
Very creative and interesting BUT way too many ads.....
"once every 5 minutes"
i mean, one atomic shell shot out a giant sewer pipe with treads destroying entire battlefields is quite good every 5 minutes.
Yes but pushing a button to destroy it 1000 miles away is more effective
i mean it's a little nuke there... i guess even one shot for one vehicle, it's pretty fine then...
@@shorray One shot, you say. There's a vehicle, based on this prototype and still being in use.
th-cam.com/video/6YZ_LdKMqcY/w-d-xo.html
Yeah, I think sending one nuclear bomb 28 miles away every 5 minutes is more than ample as things like that go.
@@nickbrutanna9973 So Those Tank Operators were on a Suicide Mission? I mean 28 miles away is not exactly far? How do they propose to escape the Fallout of the Nuclear Explosion in vehicle that moves at a snail's pace?
That's what I love about the Soviets:
If you can imagine it,
then you can build it.
Nothing is too much far-fetched
If you don't build it, they will come!
Crazy things are built all over the world. Look at "crazy" Rides.
Or
Just visit a Lamborghini showroom.
Remember in the soviet flag you have a few building tools an in Russia what you think of is never a thought it is real from you yourself
@@brummbar5895 Have you ever seen a sickle, I have actually used it.
@@brummbar5895 ù
Fun fact, the military MAZ trucks are so reliable and good at transporting extreme loads through the hostile, muddy Siberian wilderness that they are still widely used as foresting vehicles.
THE U.SS.R.AND THEN RUSSIA HAVE ALWAYS COME OUT WITH WAY AHEAD OF ITS THEIR TIME FAR FLUNG FUTURISTIC DESIGN CONCEPTS THAT ARE TOTALLY GROUNDBREAKING AND REVOLUTIONARY AND LEAVE THE REST OF THE WORLD IN AWE AND ENVY
I love Soviet engineering. The created wonderful, crazy, brilliant equipment.
Could only fire once every 5 minutes.. Because with an atomic warhead the first round is just a warning 😂
"Dimitri, fire a warning shot"
"But sir, this is a nuclear weapon!"
"Yeah yeah, just fire it, Dimitri"
Roflmao
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hahahaaaaaa 😅
@@petro3366 🤣🤣🤣
If there is one thing about the Russians that can't be denied, it is the fact they are a creative and resourceful people.
Resourceful? To waste gobs, and gobs of money of unworkable and laughable "technologies" is resourceful? That's the problem, these kinds of governments look at their citizens as a "resource".
@@palomarjack4395 I suppose you think our own govt hasn't thrown away gobs of money on ridiculous things?
Considering the US government still exists, I’d say we’re not doing as badly.
@@arynrowland862 Considering the Russian Government still exist, I'd say they're not doing as badly.
@@arynrowland862 ah yes... you clearly don't make a difference between solviet union and Russia. Anyway, speaking of existence, have you noticed that the US are the most indebt country in the world? Where Russians are like ... on the 20th spot? Yeah.... America and resourceful simply cannot be used in the same sentence...
Timestamps!
The 2B1 OKA- 0:43
The 1K17 Szhatie-2:39
The Zveno Project- 4:32
The Antonov A-40- 6:10
The MIL MI-10- 7:46
The K-84 Ekaterinburg- 9:08
The M-15 Belphegor- 11:05
The Lun-Class Ekranoplan- 12:40
Project Ekip- 14:33
The Bartini Beriev VVA-14- 16:27
The ZVM-2901- 18:12
The Kalinin K7- 19:42
The TSAR Tank- 21:22
The Evolution of MAZ Trucks - 22:58 - [ Minsk Auto Zavod 23:05 - MAZ-529 23:22 - MAZ-535 23:38 - MAZ-543 24:02 - MAZ-547 24:29 - MAZ-7904 24:49 - MAZ-7907 25:15 ]
I am sorry if i missed anything, i also tried to get every MAZ Evolution truck in the last few timestamps.
thanks
Great work bro❤
That's what i was searching
Awesome!
I like the way that the narrative tries to conquer Swizterland then denies it!
The "flying Circus" evolved into in air refueling and drone-swarms, launched and controlled by a single fighter. The US army loves this kind of stuff.
Fun fact about the ekranoplan, it only used the 8 engines to get up to hovering speed, by which point only two of them were needed to keep it moving. It also hovered 4 meters (13 ft) above the water's surface, not inches.
It also couldn't hover
Also, 13 feet is 156 inches so.......... "inches above the water" :)
@@randomentity6553 And inches are not metric, so the normal world takes some table and tries converting that shit into normal units. And we need to buy your weird tools as well as the normal ones. Bloody expensive. Just saying.
Being conservative is okay, but you can stretch it too far. These ancient units cause trouble, when you talk to people who went to normal schools (these scientific units exist for many many many years, now) and use normal units in daily life, just because EVERYBODY dropped those weird Emperor things. Except for you. Wake up! The world is larger than just your country. When will you finally discover they have passed you? Your units are out dated. Admit it. Tools like a seven thirteenth of an inch wrench? You still divide those inches in weird numbers. How about going decimal? For real, you all live in a museum!
Woow
Except it couldn't hover. It exploited an aviation phenomenon know as ground effect that occurs when a horizontal wing surface is flown over reasonably smooth ground surfaces.
It appears that with the collapse of soviet Russia we missed out on extraordinary innovation and technology.
The saucer and ekronoplans are something good
@@laszlokocsi1825 also the flying tank sounds fun
That was just paperwork & relabeling.
Another one falling for propaganda lol
p
Engineer: How long do you want the barrel to be on the 2B1-OKA?
Soviet Government: *Y E S*
I take that as an 3 mile long 🤨 one
Da comrade, in Soviet Russia big boom boom NEVER bad thing 👍
Blud thats longer than mine 😂
That ekranoplan is a genius idea. Undetectable by radar or sonar, it would've been a nightmare. Could've revolutionized the amphibious transport.
Not very compatible with stormy weather though. And you could only imagine how large was its turning arc. I think the only role it was good for was the short-range-rockets-carrying interceptor. But when the same result can be achieved with hypersonic rockets from ground-based launchpads or bomber planes, then it gets redundant. Still, it is a fun concept and a good-looking machine.
@@Tallorian a glorified troop and cargo transport then. But faster AND used only in certain situations
@@reynaldoandannieangnged6434 You need to take into account that not only it would be able to carry stuff solely between coastal places (preferably with a specialized docking infrastructure), but it would be very difficult to operate in areas with heavy naval traffic, because it's "flight" height is not enough to overpass even relatively small private boats, and its speed might make it very hard to avoid collisions.
Too many ifs and buts for a reliable military or commercial transport use.
Сейчас возрождают строительство экранопланов, но в гражданских целях. Это может стать очень полезной амфибией для большой страны и прекрасным примером инженерной мысли.
Nope. Susceptible to storms,incompatible with ship transportation (could for a while climb to about 40 meters, but couldn't hold it And had to dodge),susceptible to wind shear over land,very dangerous to fly when wave swell was over a few meters. In fact too dangerous for civilian use.
"Its too expensive" say the american engineer.
"Its too big and heavy" say the japanese engineer.
"Its too inefficient" say the german engineer.
"For when you want it?" say the soviet engineer.
@@HA-gu1qk We are lucky they where !
"please, let me out, i wanna see my family" said soviet engineer
@@greenlevel22 my grandpa is soviet engineer in he is a happiest man on that planet even now in his 89 years old he going for a walk and whistling some oldschool melodies (fallout like music:)) making random people smile ,skies few times a week,plays with my kids and takes care of his garden in summer
the american being the one to say its too expensive is probably the most insane part of this comment lmao
@@madzak9847 just stop lol, it’s embarrassing
The long legged helicopter is quite similar to the Sikorsky CH-54/CH-64 Tahre/Skycrane.
Between WW1 and WW2 Britain and German also considered building large multi-turreted tanks.
For the 2B1 Oka, the 2B1 Oka it's 420mm gun can also be replaced with a 406 mm gun that can fire. As for the Zvena Project, the Bomber used in the project is the (quite obsolete at the time) Tupolev TB-3 heavy bomber, the TB-3 is actually meant for strategic Bombing, btw, the TB-3 also carried the AN-40 which was FAR too heavy for the TB-3 to carry
You got to be fair - most of the designs were ahead of their time, and those MAZ trucks loaded with ICBMs roaming the endless Siberian forests were making sure that US citizens were kept busy digging bunkers in their back yards, so you were saying about being crazy...
And by digging bunkers they burned excessive calories from all those burgers. 😃
Absolutely every last one of these designs it’s years ahead of its Self as a Yugoslavian kid mother Russia was always symbol of strength and in pride
Wouldn't the rocket exhaust total the Maz chassis? or at least set those big tires a fire?
@@GreatWhiteNorthAK Like the soviets GAF If exterminatus was on its way
@John Doe you don't know for sure unless you try
The UFO plane needs a rebirth. Its a great idea. I think aerospace engineers need to have a look at it.
UFO planes are already in use ,what you are thinking that things in air are really aliens👽 😏.............
There is a reason why UFO design doesn't work.
Right after the csar tank
@@swamivardana9911 I think it works with hidden technology. Our government has tech hidden that would advance humanity by several decades. Internal combustion engines have been around for 120 years. Think nobody ever made one that got 100 mpg? I do.
Umm no. Stupid idea sir.
Super interesting.
These MAZ (the "smaller" ones) trucks look practical. After a refresh of the design, these can even sell today. Not only to the military.
The crazier thing was the mass popularity of technics, machinery and engineering in society in 1900-1970s. Magazines like Popular Mechanics were actually quite, well, popular in Soviet Union. And the Unoin published its own analogical magazines too. And it was just a part of a social ssytem which also included technical-oriented child clubs, youth societies, practical sections and home enthusiasts communities, educational materials, do-it-yourself kits, tech propaganda in literature, cartoons, movies, newspapers, and much more.
Nothing like this is to be seen since. Not even the "self-success" or "obey and survive" propaganda is that impressive.
The AN-2 has a radial piston engine, not a turboprop. It's reliable old school powerplant is the main reason why the bi-plane is still in widespread use, even with several air forces today. Especially in harsh, cold regions the AN-2 can still be operated fine and failures are easily fixable.
Stub lower wings on biplane crop dusters create vortexes which improve the dispersion of whatever is being applied below. That is why the Australian Transavia PL-12 Skyfarmer is a biplane.
From i've heard, in some places it was like a bus
I believe it has won it a record in the Guinness book.
It's crazy that Antonov made over 1,000 of these planes for almost 60 years.
Actually , the latest version came with a turboprop engine.
Soviet machines are incomparable with anyone. Soviets are true engineers who could be pioneer any technology you imagine.
@@risingelement Have you turned jelous or was since birth?
@@risingelement "The best army in the world" - you can only say after the US defeats an enemy of equal strength on its territory. Until now, the US has been at war with shepherds thousands of miles from its border LOL.
@@risingelement best military? Org best gay country?
True engineers who copied electric razors, irons and built the same Lada car from 1970 until It's collapse.
I'd be embarrassed if anything I made was comparable, and I'm not even an engineer.
Many of these "crazy" machines have been used quite successfully for many years!
This is the absolute most CHEESE job for any TH-cam script writer.
Just hella CHEESING it up from top to bottom, no filter, pure cheddar. Amazin
5:09 That means the USSR technically invented the Aircraft carrier, as it had the same concept and idea modern-day carriers have.
Damn. I think these machines are making me wish the Soviet Union hadn't fallen so quickly.
OH SCHEIßE HANS GET MASCHINENGEWEHE
No, they didn't. Aircraft carriers were a thing long before Zveno project started.
Wow!!
Didn't see this one comming.
Really innovative ideas for a few of those.
Witch one
They always get crazy!
boom
@@CoolPea14 😎
Spectacular! The sheer scale and power are beyond comprehension.
The Russians are mad genius. Much respect from 🇺🇲
Yeah, socialism will bring even more innovation and genius.
Most of it stolen from the Brits, the Yanks and the Germans...
@@rescyou sure, and blood transfusions, reanimation and life support was taken from the Soviets. Sharing inventions or taking them by force is a good thing, were the USSR to not share this groundbreaking medicinal knowledge you would probably not exist.
@@rescyou plus, like 70%-90% of the mentioned designs are purely Soviet designed and manufactured. I mean sure, tanks are brit invented things, but everyone uses them. planes are american but everyone uses them because they've been shared. Sharing and developing each others designs are what makes humans progress faster.
@@mikeetoo96 good one, considered going pro? Not many good comedians.
5:02 This is the first flying aircraft carrier. It's actually a good idea. Saves fuel for the smaller craft which can engage in fights far into the enemy territory.
Actually I'd say the US Akron-class was the first flying carriers
Zeppelins had attachable fighter planes so they were the first flying aircraft carriers.
how do it save fuel? if i drove a car and towed another wouldn't mine use twice as much fuel?
@@jibicusmaximus4827 it saves fuel _for the smaller craft._
Since they’re made to be small and light they dont have alot of fuel, but carrying them into battle allows them to save the fuel they would use to fly to and from the airfield.
To use your towing example, if you towed another car then yes you’d use more fuel, but the other car wouldn’t use any.
And if the other car was a racecar with a small and light fueltank, you could put it inside a semi-truck and since the Semi doesn’t need to worry about being light and nimble on a racetrack it can have much larger fuel tanks.
Which means even tho it would use more fuel, then it wouldn’t have to stop to refuel on the way to and from the racetrack, while the racecar wouldn’t be able to make that trip on it’s own
@@ValentineC137 Perfect Analogy bud. I couldn't have said it better myself. The Zeppelin carried the single engine small fighter which on it's own wouldn't have the range for Atlantic Missions were made possible by making it a parasite craft.
Your drag race car being hauled by trailer to the track is perfect 1:1 analogy.
09:10 that thing looks like the inspiration of the Reaver-Spaceships in "Firefly"
The vehicles that move the Starship and other SpaceX rockets are HUGE too! As was the mover for the Saturn V
ah yes i love how katyusha was playing in the background
Great noticing powers…
Stalin's pipe organ.
Whoo-whoo-whooo-whooo
@@boomstick4054 1890
Soviet power is the music and tanks
You know humanity is stupid when nukes are 'more humane weapon' than laser tank.
These are drunk people making this crazy stuff
Well it IS humanity so... Not surprised.
hahaha
I mean yes but no
I know
Yeah, the cockpit of the millenium falcon was inspired by the B-29 Superfortress. This is pretty well documented and a minimal amount of research would have avoided that particular pitfall. But then again, if mixing up piston and turbine engines twice a minute is no concern then I guess the bar is set for ant pole vaulting. Go Formicidae!
hey duckweed shut your holes. go nit pick the media or something.
...goes well with showing Sean Connery in some bit of hollywood cold-war-movie-action ...😂
Star Wars is dumb.
10:30 Atomic Bombs do not explode through fire. They have to be armed for any nuclear explosion to happen.
Monster:i have rise and ready to kill all humans
Also monster:*see a Giant plane with 6 missles and 8 jet engine* wtf *explodes*
Loo
You just have to love the Russian. They are willing to try anything unconventional. I love how they make everything so much bigger than it needs to be. Their nuclear submarine have steam room and a sort of hot tub they all have a small gym onboard. They're leaky nuclear reactor might kill them slowly but they will be real relaxed in good shape when the end comes.
Actually, theese subs (Typhoons) never had nuclear reactor incidents on them AND had a steam room and small basin with a gym. So they are the most healty atomic subs in the wold! )
@@user-nq7xu6gz7n 🤣
@@user-nq7xu6gz7n same difference compadre.. lmao
Agreed 🤣🤣🤣
@@ZaChYmO If you want to use some word, learn it, It is Tovarish. compadre... You speak only Amerikanish, I bet...
the Zveno project was basically a flying aircraft carrier. Russians sure were innovative actually building something in the 30s that we are still fantasizing about today.
Those motherships just evolved into midair refuelling craft
As a jamaican, I love Russia and there engineering stills.
I love when non-russian speakers tries to say something in russian, I automatically like this
the MAZ is an amazing Lorry. I can remember the the sound of two v12 diesel engiens whych were sync. It was a great show to see the last troops leaving eastgermany in 1991. i still can hear the sound and smell the emissions.... this was lovely.
Finally time to visit world's best inventors and engineers. As a Georgian (Georgia is a former Soviet Country), I feel huge amounts of nostalgia for Soviet Union.
I'm from Russia, I was born there. I was very little when my family moved to the US in 2003. I have been lucky enough to visit many countries, it interesting to see how the countries of the Soviet Union changed once it fell apart. My parents told me how bad the mafia was, and even how corrupt the cops were. This is why I think that so many Russians support Putin, he saved Russia. He took control and got rid of corruption and the mafia.
@@antongolovko1149 Well, corruption and mafia are still there, not as bad as in 90s though
@@TheUmbralPresence Agreed
@@TheUmbralPresence They're both state-run now, so I guess that's progress.
@@TheUmbralPresence Mafia is in the Pentagon and t in the White House now
That Oka was ridiculous. Can you imagine rollin' the monster out? The troop- "Ah hell nah!! The hell!!?! That's not a tank! That's a railgun!!!"
On the Antonov A40 you forgot to mention how they also had to take off most of its armor, and literally detach the turret so it was light enough to glide
Only one who tries, gets the success. Applause for USSR. Kudos to their efforts
@Russia ... is the best at bullsh!tting and terrorising the others around.
@Comrade oh boy, another slavaboo.
@@e.s.6275- best at bullshitting
What exactly?
-terroristing others
Everyone In the USSR as well as the puppet states had a good life. Terrorism was basically nonexistent as the Gov't knew a lot about every citizen and wouldn't allow terrorism to happen.
@Comrade then why do you have comrade in your name with a ushanka cheems? I've never seen anyone really slavic have that pfp.
@@canadianradiochemist4465 well I meant the state level, not individuals' level.
USSR continuously terrorised its neighbors, as well as own population.
What you had in mind was probably the period of 15-20 final years of USSR's existence, when it was something resembling a real socialism. However, let me remind you, USSR existed for about 70 years, and most of them were veeery far from a "good life".
Any extent of "good life" was limited time wise to approx. Brezhnev's ruling period, and only to those loyal to the regime (and to those unloyal, there were prisons and psychiatric clinics).
Tell about a "good life" to those multiple millions who perished during state invoked famines, mass deportations, red terror, mass killings, war crimes towards civil population, literally countless innocent victims of GULag, etc.
Also, tell about a "good life" to those many millions of peasants, who were effectively slaves, had no ID, no right of free moving, no real payment for their hard work, all the way until the end of 1960'ies.
Speaking about bullsh*tting, I meant state propaganda, again both inside and outside the country. Blatant, sheer, boundless. Nazis and Goebbels didn't invent state propaganda; they only borrowed it from the red comrades, just like concentration camps and other attributes.
These regimes were like twin brothers.
However, the big Nuremberg Trial is still to happen against the reds.
Anyway.... I listed a few largest aspects, but the subject is very wide, and impossible to cover well in a comments format.
Эхх... Как-же хорошо вспомнить старые добрые времена. Спасибо за видео.
USSR scary... 😦
Why they so angry with me 🥺
товагищ Бегия?
Только и остаётся, что старые времена вспоминать...
Fuckin TH-cam wont let me translate..
I'd think firing one nuke every five minutes is quite enough, but that may just be me.
Great job at putting this together! Learnt a lot :)
the mil mi 10 was nice, and one of their best designs as the long service history proves, it was also clearly the grandpa of modern skycrane helicopters.
and it's not like the US didn't have something similar :)
Sikorsky CH-54
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_CH-54
Then another question comes, which was made first?
@@Es-zw7ck in this case the russians were first:
Mil Mi 10 - first flight June 15th 1960
Sikorsky CH-54 - first flight May 9th 1962
@@momokochama1844 Thanks fir the answer
@@Es-zw7ck wiki helps :)
you have to admire their engineering capabilities.............they are true pioneers
the flying fortress seems so cool, but it would be even cooler if they could have a platform on the plane for soldiers to stand on aswell as barracks for paratroopers
MIL MI-10 geliocopter is absolutely stunning! Love it!
they are really genius and examples for never tiring. Persistence is an attitude to wear and learn from them. I give all the thumbs up to Russians.
Funny thing is that the Zveno (literally meaning "chain link") really was referred to as "flying circus" amongst the military. BTW, the Oka, being a reactive mortar, had a brother called 2A3 Condensator (more like "compensator", lol), which was an actual 406-mm nuclear-capable self-propelled artillery cannon. A moving naval gun. Sick. But still not as sick as D-80 with 535-mm. I guess, it's about that time the soviets ran out of amphetamines produced during WW2, so the thing was never actually built. Living in Saint-Petersburg, Russia, I have seen some of those in the flesh, like the Oka or the 2K4 Filin ("Owl") missile carrier. A direct look kinda makes you glad they were never put to use.
Dude, seeing how HOT Russian women can be is all it takes to make me glad that the Cold War never went nuclear.
As someone who's sick of the world and sick of humanity and all its bullshit, it's hard to find reasons to be proud of humanity, or to even like it...
@@Raz.C They are hot, but hard. We have no crocs or rattlers here, so humans just took the niche, lol. Russian life kinda nibbles on your personality with time. As for feeling humansick, I find it rational to admire certain exceptional folks, while keeping armed neutrality with the rest of our species, hot chicks or whatever. If they need help, help. If they want to harm, retaliate, I guess, "do thy neighbor no harm FIRST" is my motto.
@Danglin' Bolas
Hey I love your comment. I think I am an advocate for the "tit for tat" way to social coexistence as well.
Have you read about Axelrod's tournament?
@@tacitozetticci9308 Well, now I have. Living in an age of Google sure is good. I find it kinda obvious that "defectionist" strategy impacts the whole system at long term. I mean, come on, even I figured that much. Good to know bigbrains did confirm my thoughts with an experiment. Of course, human society is incomparably more complicated than that, but "tit for tat" could be a good basis for modern day philosophy. Can't avoid the problem of conflict escalation, though. Knowing humans, I was thinking of something more like a nuclear parity between superpowers, achieved through small arms regulations. You can bribe a judge, but you can't bribe a bullet. Not gonna work anyway, but hey, just let me dream of my gunpowder-smelling utopia :D
@@danglinbolas5547 Of course we need to be careful because if we apply it universally, huge tits will produce huge tats
(yeah I'm kinda dumb)
Jokes aside, what I mean is: tit for tat works wonders for small adjustments as a tool for mutual education within societies.
But it becomes pointless and deleterious when instead of slight for slight, we trade tragedy for tragedy. That's not the point of it.
The concept of the Ekranoplan would still be efficient if it worked properly:
I think you could fix the problem with it's gigantic turn radius by installing sideways oriented booster style engine on the front and on the back. So if the center of mass is in the middle it would cause an effectiv rotation. Just like a space-craft.... ?
I have screw-driven vehicles clearing weeds from the lake outside my widow every summer.
They look really fun with big trimmers on them.
Very slow vehicles, but the screws allows fairly precise manouvering.
“No, those aren’t party poppers, they’re missiles!” Sarcasm really killing me today😂😂
Same 🤣ROFL🤣
Same😂teehee😂
U mean party poopers lol
LMAO LOLOL
Sarcasm is an inferior form of whit, not a pretty look. I won't be subscribing.
Soviet engineers were way ahead form their time thus developed some of the un believable machines
@20:05 - This version of The Kalinin plane looks awesome but it's self-evident that this monster could never have gotten airborne, it literally was a (non)Flying Fortress, complete with cannons. I can't even believe they'd have bothered to make a mock-up of this plane so I suppose the image is of a model. Curiously, almost every image of the Kalinin plane shown is different
correction: EKIP as an idea did start in soviet union, yes. But first prototypes were built in 1994, after the fall. That's also when the Government of Russia approved the project and funded it, but stopped giving money in 1999.
Later the project was sold to the US
What a great upload for the day before my birthday!
Happy Birthday!!🎉🥳🕯️
Happy birthday 🎂🎂
@@davidkuzur5186 Thanks!
@@fostergameiro8246 Thanks!
Belated birthday wishes
The Mi 10 spurned another design that had much of the central fuselage removed. I watched it demonstrate at the 'Beehive Helicopter Base' at Gatwick Airport many years ago. Picking up coaches and heavy gear.
Also, unlike the US, Khrushchev thought the idea of his ground commanders having tactical-nuclear capabilities was insane and only made a parade version of this weapon. The US actually produced tactical nuclear artillery on a large enough scale to be frightening.
If you manage to set off a nuclear weapon with a fire you are the greatest engineer alive today.
Oh yeah. Nostalgic USSR
Indeed
Right
Love from India 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Love from cccp
Cnc rd1 n 2
Holy shit this is such a good list. It's really rare to see a list that contains really rare subjects (in this case the military vehicles) that I haven't seen before. Hats off to the research team.
They are all insane nowadays with guided missiles from satellites, but at the time they were considered state of the art...
The gliding tank couldn't hold any ammo as well so it couldn't shoot and it had some equipment removed.
I haven't even got past the first one. What a cannon that thing is. The recoil dampening system had to be an engineering Marvel if they had got it right. I'd have hydrolics attached to a collapsible barrel
Are you an alcohaulic?
@@Ndlanding I'm a workahaulic
I guess that if you'll be able to nuke a couple of armies and a city they will give you a new one.
Bugger me! An engineering Marvel! Presumably starring Iron Man, but not The Incredible Hulk, though possibly Bruce Banner.
Initially hydraulics were considered, but to counter recoil force, the system itself would require flexible tubing made out of materials, which did not exist at the time. Amount of force which was produced by recoil was so great that any hydraulic system would have exploded after first shot. Muzzle breaks were also installed, however, as calculations have shown, it showed signs of damage after first shot and was ripped out after 3rd, resulting in exploded barrel.
i love the Kharkovchanka antarctic exploration vehicles the USSR built, like self-contained exploration bases on caterpillar tracks. Also Vityaz DT-30 amphibious ATVs that can carry anything anywhere.
The Millenium Falcons cockpit was inspired by the B-29 Flying Fortress which was some 35 years before Star Wars
That Atlantis reference tho😂🔥
Oh those Russians....... But the only vehicle that wasn't so "weird" was MAZ I liked him the most and in my opinion all of those vehicles were crazy and insane
“Screw propelled trucks”
Me: Wait won’t that move sideways
Not when the front and rear screws move in opposite directions, as they do.
@Raf Vnetu Watch the video. Both sides have 2 screws, one moving clockwise and the other moving anti-clockwise.
It can move sidways if the driver wanted to. There are tons of vehicles made with screws like that.
They’re threaded in the opposite direction as well though which is why that works
The MAZ trucks are used in a Russian developed gamed called Spitires, Mudrunner, and SnowRunner. Pretty sweet trucks!
I don't think you'd win any prizes for guessing that 1K17 Szhatie focusing rubies probably "went missing" on a regular basis, with Soviet troops imitating the cover of the AD&D first edition Players Guide...
Those Maz military trailers are not crazy designs, they are quite useful for the terrain in eastern Europe, Maz vehicles are still used to tow tanks, pontoon bridges, nuclear missile complexes mobile to this day. The US has also adopted Maz's design to create HEMTT cars.
Russia has some amazing engineers. Cheers Stuart 🇦🇺
Did you mean it had.
In which case, you bet!
And the best were from Germany.
Cool. Thanks. Subscribed
Also has a lot of kunts that invade countries
The MIL MI-10 helicopter looks like as if it had a face and I can't unsee it anymore. Looks so happy while carrying stuff
"an aircraft unlike any other", except the Canadian Avrocar from 1958
8:52 I like how they show b-29 construction
My main reason to admire Russia is, their budget on military is relatively small when we compare it to USA but it effectively creates new technology. Imagine if they have USA's budget on military,no one will be computed to them.
Comparing budgets in Federal Reserve currency is a big mistake...
A plane bolt in Russia costs the equivalent of 1 dollar, the same bol in the US counts 99 dollars...
The Russian factory produces 100,000 bolts a day and is worth $100,000, the US factory produces 100,000 a day and is worth $10,000,000
@@marc0martim The babiest description of economy I've heard )))
Unfortunately we also have a lot of thieves and assholes.
I never knew you spoke fluent Russian. That’s some talent.
10:58, Those subs are “Bomb’s made out of Bombs.” Both the Demoman and Heavy of TF2 would be proud (Especially Demoman because he is the explosives guy).
0:05 Sean Connery truly IS one of the Soviet Union's greatest Naval Commanders.
Do you think that they ever got suspicious that he was really a Commander in Her Majesty's Royal Navy?
@Judy 21 y.o - check my vidéó On 14 November 1910, Eugene Burton Ely's first experimental take-off of a Curtiss Pusher airplane from the deck of a United States Navy ship. And 18 January 1911, Ely landed his Curtiss Pusher airplane on a platform on the armored cruiser USS Pennsylvania anchored in San Francisco Bay.
So no. The Aircraft Carrier concept first existed in USA. They were performing carrier Flight Ops since 1910.
@Judy 21 y.o - check my vidéó Also, the Soviet Union was nothing good. I lived in Rostov-on-Don. We needed Capitalist Reforms much earlier. Communism starved over 30 million people. And the Gulags killed many more.
Life was miserable under an oppressive dictatorship.
@@hillarysemails1615 Не пизди!
i honestly thought the mazd 7907 was the most insane because the number of engines you'd need is absolutly insane no matter how big you make them. well that and the amount of fuel those things would consume on just one 45 minute trip... i mean come on. they probably would've gone even bigger if the country had actually stay'd together
This MAZ had an electric transmission: this is when ICE engine runs the electric generator and each axis has an electric engine.
@@Alexander-gh7kz
Essentially its diesel-electric like modern trains are, and some hybrid Diesel cars and trucks out there.
There different systems but what you describe is diesel engine runs a generator that in turn generates electricity to feed bunch of electric motors, the most common type is the one that uses electric engine aid for the diesel to remove the transmission, the electric motor acts like the transmission during low speeds for extra torque applications.
There are five evolution stages. The 7907 is the true FINAL FORM!!!!!
I love the creativity. We need more of it.
the Tsar tank design wasn't moving away from classic caterpillar designs, because these designs weren't standard yet: when the Tsar tank was designed and tested in 1914/1915, British Mark tanks didn't exist, the Renault FT didn't exist, and the existing projects like the Schneider CA1 hadn't proved their usefulness yet
All the Maz were my favorite vehicles. However, all these machines looked incredible and cool; very fascinating and informative. Russians are creative and innovative people, especially for the time, it was way ahead of their time.
Those machines were way ahead of their time. If they got today's technology somehow and got successful then What kind of world we will be living in. Huge respect for Russia/Soviet Union.
a shitty one
All these failed mega projects brought the union to its downfall. What a waste of time and money.
@@bar95900 you cannot taste success if you haven't tasted failure. So, a failure makes a man perfect. Every major project has to be failed in its early attempts, because of those failures we learn.
@@akshayr.madrid3923 didn’t most projects get dropped?
So... In light of Ukraine... Are you still a Russian fanboy
The ekranoplan is my favorite. It looks like a monster, ugly, stupid and scary, yet it is awesome. I would love to see it in action.
"Soviet Inventions"
Proceeds to show a TSAR TANK... (From WW1)
this is the stuff i love about the soviet union, its relics left behind are fascinating and very creative.
learning about the soviet union’s history is the reason why im learning the russian language and so excited to actually visit the place one day, snd learn even more.
Come drop by, we can show you some incredible stuff of a lost civilization.
@@alexanderpafatnov1044 oh i will, i gotta go through college n stuff, once im able to visit id love to explore and meet real true russian people, who can not only help me master their cool language but learn more about their culture and history, and then eventually the history of soviet relics
Think again now.
@@slybesker still wanna go to russia? xD
@@slybesker
Even if i think a Billion times
My thoughts will still be the same
but why is that
cause Soviet Union & Russia is not the same
FULLSTOP
Damn, to think of the transportation revolution we could have experienced had history gone another way. What interesting and creative minds!
Unfortunately the US had Gorbachev in their pocket... So, non of those brilliant ideas had a real chance.
And today in capitalism you simply can't do much as it all require a profit.
But communism allowed the bright people to make the dream, the idea come true.
Regardless if it has direct profit or not.
Nowadays it is almost impossible to get such resources and government support.
@@familytvbox5218 Impossible yet.
@@familytvbox5218 at the expense of the people and their lives
@@supernovavortex3069 The Soviets had far less poverty than the US( literally not even close), better education, better social programs, better childcare, better city planning, better public transport, no homelessness etc etc etc.
OH THE HUMANITY, how could they do that to their own people?!
A shame what happened to the Ekranoplan, such a magnificent machine ♥
12:48 ah yes the plane that will never fly but an extremely fast missle boat
a few months ago I went to the missile museum half way between Kyiv and Odessa. Greatest museum ever. So much Soviet military hardware.
I wonder if the Russian invasion (this last week of February 2022) has captured the museum yet.
@@johnnycreighton29 judging by the location he described, probably not as it would be dead in the middle of Ukraine
I also spent 36 hours in the Chernobyl Exclusion zone. I can not understand why any military would seek to occupy this area. There is no infrastructure there beyond a $1.9 billion sarcophagus.
No power plants, no airport, no major road, just a bunch of nuclear dust that stays on the ground until you stir it up.
Ukraine specialised in rocket building during the USSR times, and was also leading producers after 1991.
I guess much of the Russian space program (and military) relied on Ukrainian expertise prior to 2014?
@@lasseenevoldsen2021 It seems to me as though the Ukrainians may have been the primary ones to thank for a majority of the USSR's military technology & production.
FINALLY! A video that actually talks about what's on the thumbnail in its content! WHAT A CONCEPT!
Fun fact, the VVA-14 makes an appearance in Metal Gear Solid 3, Snake Eater, as does a machine with screw propulsion like the ZVM