Compare coverage and stay informed on breaking news by subscribing through my link ground.news/searchparty. Take advantage of their Holiday sale to get 40% off unlimited access to all their features for just $5/month. Sale ends December 31.
Thank you for sharing our mission Search Party! If anyone's interested in getting the full picture of issues like the one in this video, check out the link in the description and let us know if you have any questions.
What you've overlooked is that these governments also like that the issue between Israel and Palestine persists so that the public doesn't focus on the internal problems of their countries and stays fixed on these external issues.
You nailed it! in order for Arab leaders to continue stealing, looting and killing their own people they must keep the people's minds pre-occupied that their is an external enemy and that enemy can never be defeated you can the leader of Syria for example whenever he talks about the situation in Syria he always says " their is a global conspiracy against us and we are fighting against that " but who is the enemy and what are they're motives? He never specifies instead he keeps saying this to give his pro-butt lickers something to cheer for and get behind
No one cares about that because most of these governments aren't genuine democracies which means they don't serve the people so why would they care about internal issues? Building the wealth of the rich and powerful is more important.
This is a double edged sword if it is true. Because once the extenal issue become so big and the government still takes no action, then the problem becomes internal and all the pressure is redirected towards the government. so the governments would have to walk a very fine line.
It's the other way around bud. The people are the ones that want the governments to focus on the 'external' issues. This arguments is weak and mainly pushed by the governments themselves to silence the people, internal v. external issues is a paradigm the governments choose to separate issues that are otherwise totally linked. If the UAE benefits internally from an external issue, then this model is irrelevant, likewise if Egypt suffers internally from an external issue. The only example where one can grant you a pass is Iran, but even there, this only apples to the IL-PS as the external issue... but there's the issue of embargoes from the west imposed on Iran, hugely impacting the internal situation there. So in the end, it still remains a moot argument with little to no bite to it. This paradigm is only useful in massive superpowers where external issues only have a marginal effect on the internal situation, but no political entity in the middle-east is a superpower.
People seem to misunderstand the topic of the video: This is a video about the Geopolitical relations between Israel and the Arab states, and how the conflict with Hamas makes them re question their relationships. This video is NOT about the conflict or about who is right or wrong
Exactly. I'll go even further and say it doesn't even matter who's right or wrong. Israel wants peace and the Palistinians want to be free. That is the crux of the issue here.
@@gal2659free ?! can’t have an airport or a sea port or move in or out without a permit and you call this free ? What a delusional way to think about freedom.
@@Abdullah_Bajobair Looks like we got an expert here. Sorry, but you need to recheck what happened in Gaza in 2005, and whether it could have an airport or a sea port..
CORRECTION: at 15:40 I reported Search Party is celebrating over 230 subscribers. We are, in fact, celebrating over 230,000. I am deeply sorry for this grievous error and pledge to do better next time. Thank you all for watching :) - Sam
This video felt extremely one sided and biased. Completely ignores a lot of historical context and facts and unfortunately this is being passed on as ‘history’.
@@melodicvirginia Yes, for example 11:00 The blockade in 2006 was specifically because “Hummus” was chosen by the people. The reporting on this video is heavily anti Isrl. Vox, where he comes from, has done the same in recent videos.
Great video! Some small corrections: 1. While during the 1973 Yom Kippur war Israel did cross the Suez canal and made some gains during the final phase of the war, they withdrew back to the Asian side of the canal following a renewed ceasefire. 2. The audio said Anwar Sadat was killed by the military, but it was an organisation called the Egyptian Jihad that assassinated him. They disguised themselves as soldiers and opened fire at him while he was observing a military parade, ironically one commemorating his "victory" in the 1973 Yom Kippur war.
After renewed ceasefire egypt kept holding land they got during war (whole east side of canal) while israel withdrew from all land they got in this war.
There was one more: around the 3 minute mark the narrator said the Arab states agreed to reject Israel "until it gave Palestinians land back." This is ignoring the fact that until 1967 Israel did not occupy the West Bank or Gaza and those countries attacked anyway. The modern public Arab position, that of wanting a two state solution, was adopted later.
In 1972, Sadat expelled 20,000 Soviet advisers from Egypt and opened new diplomatic channels with Washington, D.C., which, as Israel’s key ally, would be an essential mediator in any future peace talks. He formed a new alliance with Syria, and a concerted attack on Israel was planned.
It's quite hillarious that he points out Israel took more land when they won the Yomkippur like DUHHHH don't you know how war works???? Or are scared of loosing millions of inbred fans
Its because 1. They know Israel and obliterate them and 2. Its more in their favour for an Israeli state as it means Iran isn't focusing their entire projection into Arab states so it means they can focus on other things and building up defences against both Israel and Iran.
Why ? when did Arab states helped them ? '48 war was full of self interests and desires to annex territory (to Greater Syria aspiration or to Jordan, as the latter did, which isn't mentioned here, simply says "Arab control" in 02:45). Hell, the diversity is what made them lose that war.. Qawuqji couldn't stand El-Husseini, or Hassan Salame.. no co-ordination no nothing.. Palestinians themselves were divided with the extreme anti-partition policy led by El-Husseini, who were unfortunately the leading voice, against more moderates who were either pro-partition or up for discussion. Division even led to assassination of moderates like Sami Taha. '73 war was to revenge for the '67 loss and gain territories back. Some more Historical reasons why Arab leaders don't help them: Jordan- 1951 King assassinated, guess by who. 1970 Black September. Lebanon- 1975 dragged into an insane civil war partly/mostly (depends who you're asking) by Palestinian refugees. During this time, Syria also started having shakey relations with the Palestinians as a result. Kuwait- Palestinian refugees supported Saddam during the invasion Egypt- el-Sisi praying every night that Israel would finish Hamas. Can't stand them, they're a branch of the Muslim brothers, his worst enemies. Egypt co-decided and enforced the 2007 blockade for a reason. They always tied themselves with the extreme leaders.. Saddam, Ghaddafi, Idi Amin, always looking to incite and cause troubles in other places.. The only Arabs that are helping are other Iran proxys.. and that's the only reason they're helping.. Why would Arab governments be dragged into a surprise war made by a bunch of psychos ? Arab leaders know well enough who Hamas are. They know exactly what happened in Gaza between 2005-2007 (which isn't mentioned in the video), and they know that since then, Gazans life is made miserable by Hamas. This war, is just another one in a line of wars between Hamas and Israel, which gained nothing but more poverty and desperation for Gazans. Everyone realize that when Hamas took over, they blew a great precedent for the West Bank to be free of Israeli occupation as well.. They know Hamas is also Qatarian funded, and if you'll dive into the recent Qatar diplomatic crisis, you'll get another reasons why Arabs aren't the biggest fans of this. It's a weird headline for this video.. the Arab world was always split
Egypt and Jordan didn't need to give them what they already own, and they didn't build settlements that tries to steal the land like Israel is doing, and we shouldn't forget to mention these lands were connected politically and culturally for thousands of years so the Palestinians, Egyptians and Jordans belongs to the same nation
On the eve of the Yom Kippur war, Dovi, one of Marwan's handlers, told his bosses at Mossad that their mole in the Egyptian state demanded an immediate meeting between 4-5 October. The meeting was “to give information of great importance… connected to the ‘chemicals’ in his possession”. “Chemicals” was the code word for warnings about information concerning an impending war.
Sadat refused to sign a peace deal with Israel unless they kept the gaza and the west Bank in israeli control as he did not want the Palestinians in his country
Well, people say that palestine isnt independent becuase of Israeli occupation. The point is that from 1948 up to 1967 the west bank and gaza were under arab control, meaning that if they really wanted a country in 48' borders like they claim they could have had it a long time ago...@@shway1
@@shway1 it would have had no choice, it was weak back then.... the only reason Israel captured these lands is because the arab countries planned and invasion against Israel, so Israel had to strike preemtively... Also, a two state solution was offered to the paleatinians on several occasions, and all the offers were denied, even ones who are very close to the 48' borders.
Missed an opportunity to clarify why israel is not a colonialist state; the jewish immigrants were not agents of Britain. Did not mention Arab or Jewish regional displacement, planned attacks leading up to the 6 Day War and various other points, including Hezbollah attacks on Israel and deeper explanations of geopolitical motivations. Content here is informative but incomplete.
In 1967 didn't Egypt close off the Gulf of Aqaba to Israel shipping and the surrounding Arab nations mobilize their troops (similar fashion to Russia before they Invaded Ukraine)? That prompted Israel to be preemptive? This video cartwheels over a lot of details.. but I guess this topic can't be covered in full in 16mins.
Marwan, the son-in-law of former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, told the then Mossad chief Zvi Zamir “there is a 99 percent chance that the war will start tomorrow… (Oct 6, 1973) it will start simultaneously on both fronts, the Egyptian and the Syrian”. Those warnings were largely dismissed by the Israeli defence establishment. But they proved accurate.
THANK YOU. This was the contextual video on the middle east that I feel like has really been missing. I feel much better informed for having watched it. I appreciate it.
Dude he oversimplified and missed so much stuff,not giving proper context.. he said that “Israel sparked the 6 day war” which is not how it really went down. Israel attacked preemptively as a response to Egypt and Arab armies amassing at the border. In other words, the Arabs were gettting ready to attack Israel
One important piece of context for the six day way is that Egypt and Syria were building up tanks and their armies on the Israeli border, and many of the key signs for war like soviet ambassadors leaving Also that the Israeli population is primarily not European Jews anymore. The population is roughly 20% Arab, 45% Mizrach Jews(Middle Eastern/North African) and 35% Ashkenazi Jews (European). With if course Jews that don't fit any of these categories like Beta Israel from Ethiopia and Bene Israel from India.
The Non-Ashkenazis have been westernized since a while now. The fact that Israel is a Western base in the middle east and that its population has absolutely nothing in common (religiously, ideologically, culturally) with the rest of the region's populations is very difficult to contest.
@@martinmatino6253 What do you mean by "westernised"? There's almost no difference between Lebanese Christians and Arab Israeli Jews in looks or their outlooks.
@@varsoo1doesn't change the fact israel is settler colonial project(zionist literally called themselves colonizers)and arabs are treated as second class citizens . Similar to south africa .
@@pixelpie5280 doesn’t change the fact that Arabs (some after 1948 began to call themselves Palestinians) tried to eradicate the xJe.ws since the 1800’s and one day one of Israel they along with 5 Arab countries sent their armies into Israel.
@@martinmatino6253 there are Christian Israelites and Christian Lebanese that look the same and have similar values. There use to be more Christian Lebanese but Palestinians in large number went into southern Lebanon and were a big factor in starting a war against the Christian Lebanese while also attacking Israel
One correction: at 2:50 you said that Israel sparked the 1967 six days war. While Israel did start the war it was only after Egyptian troops were mobilized to the border, and Abdel Nassar (the Egyptian President) declared he was going to wipe Israel off the map.
The video attempts to portray Israel as the initiator of the conflict on multiple occasions. However, in reality, Israel was often provoked and responded in self-defense, which gradually escalated into larger conflicts. In most cases, Israel was not the aggressor.
This video is very misleading. There is overemphasis on the connection between the Palestinian issue to domestic and strategic issues of many of the Muslim countries. There is no mentioned on the many peace agreement Israel has made with the Palestinians (accept for the Oslo accords) that were rejected by the Palestinians. There is no mentioned on the catastrophic attempts done by Palestinians to overthrow governments of countries that host them (Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt). This video is trying to paint a picture, but it's not the reality.
9:22 again with your Palestinian land back which is wrong because they never had it. And Jordan making peace was a good thing don't make it bad because even more wasn't accomplished. Jordan can't negotiate on behalf of Hamas.
Really glad to see more coverage on this issue form a more macro lens POV and less from an emotional POV. I feel like only with these kinds of large scale contexts can the conflict be inched towards peace, not with calls for the destruction of Gaza or for the abolition of the state of Israel, as these are coming more from a place of raw emotion and have no actual basis in real world context and implications
When lives are on the stake both parties can get emotional, but the important thing is to allow for that emotion blind you from truth about the genocidal campaigns dehumanisation and the apartheid regime
Simple Israel 🇮🇱 wants those arab countries part of lebanon 🇱🇧 plus jordan 🇯🇴 part of syria 🇸🇾 and little part of iraq 🇮🇶 too THEY WANT THE GREATER ISRAEL 🇮🇱
@@nommsperhaps when it is about local affairs. But about when it is about the Israel-Hamas war you would need to watch all the time to catch their latest apologize for misinformation before you could trust it. Apparently, getting a story first comes before getting it right.
@@nomms Outlets can be different on topics and audiences. Is the BBC factual in international coverage? Absolutely. Some of the best coverage in the world. How they're covering transgender rights in their own country? Absolute trash. And it's not just them. Al Jazeera, for example. They do an excellent job covering much of the Mideast with an objective eye. They do great work there. Covering their home country of Qatar? Very different. Context matters in all aspects. Both are government-funded outlets. They do maintain a lot of editorial independence, but there can always be a pain point where they could toe the line. Doesn't mean you can't rely on their coverage at all, but be smart in how you rely on it and understand where its coming from.
Kinda disingenuous to jump over the entire build up to the 6 day war and refer to it as "Israeli aggression", when the more accurate title would be "preemptive Israeli war"
You forgot the issue that Palestinians have been extremely disruptive and negative for the governments that did help them. Muslim brotherhood meddling with secular Arabism in Egypt and Syria, ruining Lebanon from a peaceful multi religious Christian entity into the war torn mess it is today, the Jordanian assassinations against the former and attempted against the current king, they supported saddams war in Kuwait despite Kuwait being one of the few countries that let them in in massive numbers, and a few more incidents besides. The Arab state are conscious and wary of Palestinians for good reason because they’ve done more damage than Israel has technically.
This was a basic amt of info about the conflict, with decent accuracy. I don’t think he has done enough research to speak about what you’re saying. Most people don’t know this, glad to see a few genuinely knowledgable commentators here.
The muslim brotherhood candidate won the elections fair and square in the 2011 egyptian elections The majority of people wanted a muslim state in Egypt, which is why they voted for Morsi. Also, that's a very big oversimplification of events that took place in Lebanon leading to its collapse: the PLO did play a part in it, but it wasn't the only reason the country collapsed (other reasons include sectarian tensions, the militias question, refusal to recognize palestinian immigrants as lebanese citizens, the overwhelming power that the president had over the cabinet, systematic corruption in every level of government, etc. Which issue was more important depends on which religious group you ask)
Arab puppet rulers don't represent the will of the people living there just because isreal is in bed with their rulers doesn't mean the people living there like the isrealis.
@@thisisforsteam2316 I'll tell you Lebanon's problem: it was a state which prioritised Christians over everyone else, established by France to serve France's interest against neighbouring Muslim countries.
I always thought Atlas was the best thing Vox ever produced. I loved what Sam did with it and elevated it once Johnny went to Borders. Atlas is in good hands still but there's now basically an 'Atlas-only' channel? Oh hell yes! Expect a comment along the lines of "this is my very favourite thing on TH-cam and I love it dearly, I will set aside time for it and look forward to watching each upload no matter the topic". Those sweet infographics and the welll-researched topics are Chef's Kiss. Did I mention this is and has from the outset, my very favourite series on TH-cam and I love it dearly? Because I do! You're the best Sam
One of the best videos of this conflict I've seen. The colours you used on the graphics, especially the graphs, made this soooo much easier to follow than almost all similar channels. Great job.
you cant call it a conflict if one side has nuclear weapons, tanks, aircraft, artillary, and a standing army while the other has a small militia group in only the gaza strip
Yeah the Arab world has always been split.. that’s why there are countries like Syria and Yemen that have been in a state of civil war for like over a decade
Are we really gonna completely gloss over everything leading up to the 6 day war in 67 and just say that Israel started it? All signs were pointing to an imminent invasion from Jordan and Egypt and Egypt had also blockaded the gulf of aqaba (which is literally an act of war...).
He DID say that Israel started it and I beg to differ. Israel took the first strike that is true, but Nasser was told a lie by the Soviets and surprise surprise it took off.
This is not the first time they have done this. I commented on this extremely biased selective presentation of the facts on a previous video they made where they also glossed over everything leading up to the 6 day war and simply blamed Israel. I'm glad to see others picking up on it.
This is not the first time they have done this. I commented on this extremely biased selective presentation of the facts on a previous video they made where they also glossed over everything leading up to the 6 day war and simply blamed Israel. I'm glad to see others picking up on it.
2:54 in 1967 Israel didn't spark a war Egypt did and Israel made a preemptive strike they legally gained the Sinai and Judea and Samaria in a defensive war.
"Great essay! However, I believe that starting the discussion of this issue with British colonialism is an oversimplification. The British only held control for 28 years, which is a relatively short period in the history of empires. Before that, the land had been under Ottoman Empire rule, and Jews had lived there for centuries. Ignoring this history, ignores another big part of this puzzle.
Jews didn't even make more than 5% of population under Ottoman rule. Brits wooed Arabs to backstab Ottomans - a Muslim authority - in exchange for a large Arab state of their own but later backtracked. Not only did it backtrack, it offered Palestine to Jews in 1917. Your mind is too simplistic to understand this conflict, especially the role of Brits.
@@maquacr7014 Then we can go back further, before the Ottoman rule to the Muslim Conquest when 90,000 Christians were massacred. My point is that this area is millennia old and has been fought over many times. To blame it all on the Brits, who I'm not saying are innocent in this, and use words like "Colonialism," and disregard all this previous history and the historical importance of this land to so many of all religions and backgrounds, won't make solutions come any easier. Also, we don't need a negative response. Debate is important and necessary. Don't make it a zero-sum game and throw around insults. It's counterproductive.
I guess that does highlight the complexity of this history when we’re asking which 90,000. I was referring to the siege of Jerusalem in 636. I was going way back for that one. I’m curious I’ve been building a reading list to help myself understand all this, do you have any books, articles to recommend?
I’m sorry, but you fail to mention one very crucial fact. Jordan and Egypt rules the the West Bank and Gaza Strip from 1948 until 1967 and didn’t even think about establishing a Palestinian state. There are two main reasons for that, first they considered the Arabs living on those territories as an extra ion of their own nations. Such as Jordan annexing the West Bank, and secondly they had an issue with Israel existing at all.
@@ymtzlgn no no I don't need to go back to Arabia cuz the cananeties arab is the first people live there will you European came here after the zionists bch movement understood?? So I am from the original people will you just like the white people who lived in South Africa
While I appreciate the depth you get into here in this video and that you can't possibly include everything, there are multiple instances where you gloss or entirely skip over information that can help viewers build a more complete and accurate understanding and opinion on the subject. Examples: - when Wa'el says "mainly European Jews" at 2:15, no context or time frame is given, ignoring the fact that the 1948 deceleration of Israel resulted in all of the Arab countries expelling their Jewish populations and so already in 1950 the majority of Jews in Israel were not "European". Regardless, this also plays into (mostly antisemitic) tropes claiming that Jews have no historical connection to the land are are "white, European settlers". - when talking about the early 2000s and peace between Israel and the Palestinians, ignoring the second Intifada as a potential reason for rejection of the Saudi peace plan, as well as the multiple peace initiatives and deals offered to the PA by Israel (for example Olmert agreeing to almost everything the wanted), makes it seem as if Israel rejected the only peace initiative, didn't initiate any themselves, and implies that Palestinians have no agency of their own.
Despite what Sam Ellis claims to be an unbiased video, this video is extremely biased against Israel. Probably because all sources, left and right, like to be antisemitic. If he truly wanted to be unbiased, he wouldn't just invite Wa'el Alzayat, an outspoken anti-Israel propagandist, but he would also invite someone from the Israeli side to speak about the conflict. I'm quite disappointed.
@@andreimandelshtam1943 I don't think that "all sources" are antisemitic (and not all people who aren't "pro-Israel" are antisemitic). Western voices in academia and journalism tend to be biased for sure, though I don't think some fringe right-wing super pro Israel voice here would have balanced things out either. As an Israeli, I found Wa'el to be pretty fair with what he was saying, not that I necessarily agreed with all his analysis. I just think that the perspective from which he was speaking was clearly a biased one, just like I would have regardless of how hard I tried to present things neutrally.
4:21 you say Egypts peace treaty with Israel was seen as a betrayal because it didn't solve this problem (i.e. the Palestinian problem). That is again misleading the issue is they the other Arabs wanted the total destruction of Israel not just the areas you highlighted on the map on Judea and Samaria. Ok maybe you can get 30sec without being dishonest? Can you please?
This video leaves out a lot of the history. Why not analyze the decision making of Palestinian leaders? The 2nd Intifada, a terror campaign orchestrated to make the Peace Process untenable. Why not mention how Israel left Gaza? Unilaterally, you make it seem like Israel unreasonable wanting to leave the West Bank, when what happened with Gaza was purely a result of Israeli optimism. If they want a two state solution they should pressure the Palestinians to accept the existence of Israel.
This video was meant to be 16 min and about how arab don’t support palastine nowadays, i couldn’t even think of a better way to clarify it, And there was never a peace just to imagine a colonial body from west comming to middile east bcz west has been killing jews all over is ridiculous, plus Israel has been taking palastine and killing them over and over with west support how tf is it imaginable to think of peace
@@lewar_kurdi The Jews are the indigenous and native inhabitants of the land of Israel and there has always been a continuous Jewish presence there. The Jewish people had always been coming back to the land, despite its poverty and violence. This was a growing dynamic long before the Holocaust. The "West" did not give the Jews the land because of the Holocaust, the Jewish population grew and demanded self-determination. It tried to coexist with Arabs but the Arabs killed Jews in Pogroms in the 1920s and that soured relations. The West did not back the Jews, but the Arabs. The British always sided with the Arabs, they limited Jewish immigration, which would have saved millions during the Holocaust. They supported an Arab majority single state, before the Jewish Insurgency against the British forced them to leave the issue to the UN. When Israel declared independence, only Czechslovakia sold it weapons and they did that for opportunist reasons because they needed money after WW2. The British sold weapons to the Arabs and British officers commanded the Jordanian Arab Legion, the only competent Arab military force. Responsible for ethnically cleansing the Jews of Jerusalem, Judea, and Samaria. The leaders of Western countries embargoed Israel, they didn't care and wanted to keep buying Arab oil. This dynamic changed slightly when Socialist Ba'athist dictatorships took power in various Arab countries which pushed them towards the USSR and the US therefore towards Israel. Israeli Arabs enjoy more right and freedoms than Arabs anywhere else in the Middle East. Israel offered Arabs citizenship, in 1948, there were even Arabs that fought for the IDF, most especially Bedouin, reaching the rank of Colonel. The narrative should take into account how the Arab nations have always failed to support Palestinian people, trying to use them as tools against Israel to distract their own citizens from bad government and corruption. How they could have easily paid to help settle Palestinians who left their homes, with a single day of oil revenue, they could have settled permanently all Palestinian refugees. They didn't. Palestinian leaders today continue to insist on war against Israel, a national suicide, while live the good life as Billionaires in Qatar. Arabs need a better leader who is willing to work towards peace in good faith. In the early 2000s, Israel offered '67 borders and East Jerusalem, the PLO said no and started the 2nd Intifada, a campaign of terrorism and suicide bombings targeting innocent Israeli civilians, Jews, Druze, Arabs, and others. They could have had peace on the most generous terms imaginable, but they said no and resorted to terrorism. They reaped what they sowed.
I thought there were two odd ones: Israel 'sparking another war' in 67 and rejecting Saudi Arabia's ask for a Palestinian state are pretty questionable claims. That being said, I don't want to crash the conversation: it is really hard to give context on this issue and you've done a brilliant job.
Was looking for this comment. Saying Israel sparked the conflict isn’t accurate. They were responding to military build on their boarders from Syria, Egypt and Jordan. An attack was imminent. It’s impossible to go over this history in 16 minutes.
@@thegreatprogressivemind788 I saw a documentary that said he didn't want one, but it had gotten away from him and he was worried about being assassinated by his officers if he did not.
They re-established diplomatic relations that they haven’t had for only a few years, that’s it, no extra peace that wasn’t present a decade ago or more
Saying that the Israelis sparked another war in 1967 when all their neighbours moved military equipment to their borders is a very nice hot take. 02:50 It was a preemptive strike, not a war insinuated by the Israelis.
2:49 correction: the word "sparked" isn't exactly accurate here. Yes, Israel hit first, but it did so as a preemptive maneuver against Egypt's air force, as its intelligence noticed Egypt and Jordan preparing their military for attack. There was going to be a war either way, Israel just chose to not be the sitting duck.
Egypt was not going to invade Israel, even an israeli general said this in an interview: "we have to be honest with ourselves, Nasser (the president of Egypt in that time) was not going to invade us, WE decided to invade him" (i don't remember the name of who said this, but if you search it up you'll find it) That's why israeli air force shot down all the egyptian airforce in sinai in less than 2 hours, because they were not preparing themselves to go to war, THEY WERE NOT GOING TO INVADE ISRAEL. As someone who's been searching a lot about middle eastern wars, especially the arab-israeli wars, i can already tell in the first five minutes that this video is pretty biased, pathetic.
Objective? LOL. Mentions that 1400 Palestinians were killed in retaliatory attacks in October 2023 but conveniently fails to mention it was in response to Hamas slaughtering over 3000 Israeli men, women, and children on October 7th.
14:38 or maybe those countries recognize the justice of Israels cause? Why assume bad motives on their behalf? At least present some other possibilities.
This was a good basic overview of the history and I understand you can’t include everything but you could’ve mentioned the PLO and the fatah-Hamas conflict. The main thing though was that the main reason Israel didn’t accept the Arab peace initiative wasn’t the West Bank, it was that it would’ve included right of return to Israel proper.
Video is great as usual. I'd give a tiny suggestion, make the video divided by chapters (as it's called in TH-cam) that'll clearly demarcate different aspects and subtopics inside the video (also, it'll clearly mark the Sponsorship segment). That's just a tiny suggestion... Edit: I wonder what you'll make in the next video (given it's Atlantic Ocean in there)
I think you overlooked the fact that in 2005 Israel completely withdrew from Gaza and dragged Jews living in Gaza out of their homes in hopes to make peace. Then the people of Gaza elected Hamas…
They were colonists and settlers. Most of Gaza wasn't born when Hamas was elected. Hamas was elected with only 30% of the vote. Hamas was also supported by Israel before it took over Gaza.
@@bloodfiredrake7259 whatever the Jews living in Gaza were, the Israeli government took them out so that they could attempt to make peace with the Palestinians living there. Are you trying to tell me that the people in Gaza don’t want Hamas as their leader? Why don’t you condemn Hamas for not taking care of their civilians? They never thought to build even one bomb shelter to protect against Israel’s supposed unwarranted attacks?
😢no mention that thousands of jews from all the Islamic states were expelled. They were Iraqi, Tunisian, Algerian citizens who had everything taken away because of their religion. I think its important to address that its not a hatred of Israel, but a hatred of all Jews. Strange how media seems to omit this. Israel hasn't been the nice guy, but its not the state of Israel that Hamas is trying to wipe out, its the Jewish population they are trying to wipe out.
I can't grasp the cognitive dissonance that you must have to believe that the withdrawal is a gesture of peace, despite it being coupled by an illegal blockade on air, sea, and ground. Israel made Gaza an open air prison and you dare to portray that with a positive view ? the withdrawal holds no importance whatsoever.
Nice video. But 2:52 wording could have been better instead of “Israel sparked another war”. Yes They launched pre-emptive strike but after iraq egypt and jordan mobilized their armies on their border. More context would have helped to first time viewers
No mention on how in 2005 Israel left the Gaza Strip exactly because of the Mutual Disengagement plan. Israel kept their part of the bargain, but what did the Palestinians do? Voted Hamas in to power in 2005 and by 2006 they were in complete control.
yep, and im think that if they kept going in the right peaceful way, Palastine would benefits today west bank on their control and maybe other lands too
@@fierceharpy4636 there could be peace if anyone wanted it, but the Palestinians do not. You can ask them they will tell you straight up or you can read their charters.
@@user-hp2go6iw7p i know bro. even if israel gouvernement is not innocent but Palestinians also are responsible of what is happening to them. they should acknowledge israel as a state and stop this nonsense of the whole area is palestine. but they will never do that and they are condamn to keep suffering until Israel is weakened, unfortunately.
Rubbish. Israel is the one who financially propped up Hamas in order to rival the more recognized PLO and to create division within Palestine and thwart a future state. Israel then agreed to relinquish stolen Palestinian land and halt their settlements in OSLO but instead they kept every inch and expedited their illegal settlements far into previously agreed upon Palestinian Territories and with brutal violence. Once you stop reading Israeli propaganda and do your own research you will feel better about knowing the truth
If the peace deal's is offering slavery! How you will call it a peace treaty? Isreal rejected more then Palestines! All have sympathies for isreal but not knowing they refuses any Palestine state!
Correction: The Saudi-Israeli agreement was on difficult terms to the zionist entitythat were requested by the Palestinian Authority (Fatah), including a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders, but because Hamas was not part of the agreement, it carried out the attacks to be an active party in it, and this is what Hamas leaders said several days after the attacks that they are ready to open the political path to agreement and recognition of the Zionist entity
For someone uneducated on the subject this might seem like a fair recap of historical events. It is not. * Israel did not start the 1967 (six day war), Egypt did by closing the Straits of Tiran (an act of war), kicking out UN peace keeping force in Sinai and mobilizing on the border. * Israel invasion of Southern Lebanon was preceded by numerous terror attacks from PLO based in Southern Lebanon. * Israel did offer the WB back to Jordan during the peace talk, they didn't want it. * For that matter, Israel also offered the Gaza and over 92% of the WB (2000 Camp David). The Palestinian leadership (Yasser Arafat) refused. In 2008, Ehud Olmert offered Gaza and over 99% of the WB (with territorial swaps) and parts of East Jerusalem. The Palestinian leadership (Mahmoud Abbas) just walked out on it. * The blockade of the Gaza strip only began *after* Hamas took over, not before.
@BDB I've also pointed out their errors and the act that the content creator said "Israel sparked another war" set me off. I'm old enough to remember that war, and its been endlessly discussed and analyzed by people smarter than him. FFS
So many of your points are outright lies. Absolute Israel propaganda. Funny how you frame Israel giving crumbs to the Palestenian people as good will actions. Or how you frame resistance as terror attacks, but not the much more common, deadly and brutal Israel attacks. Just read your sentences. Arabs are bad for "starting" the 1967 war. But Israel isn't bad for starting the war against Lebanon. Arab resistance is terrorism and bad. Israel genocide can't be bad and is actually defense. The powerful is allowed to genocide, terrorize and murder hundreds of thousands, while the weak isn't even allowed to throw stones back. Whenever Israel talks, it reads exactly like Russia talking about Ukraine, English in Ireland, French in Algeria or Third Reich in Poland. Exact same words. Genocide, apartheid and settler colonialism. Of course Israel will pretend to give things back, and then claim Palestenians refused it. The powerful always do this obvious move. You have to be very stupid to fall for it. There will never be peace in the Region while Israel exists. Even after you kill all Palestenians, their brothers will remember. The only road for peace if the abolishment of Israel and the creation of ONE state for all christian, jewish, and muslim natives. Like christian, jewish, and muslim Palestinians been asking for decades.
Also they didn't mention they can't give back the Golan Heights to Syria as they are still not in peace and would be a death sentence for all people living within a 100km radius from the heights due to modern artillery.
At the end of the video, you say that the Arab countries want some sort of resolution to this Palestinian situation. How can there be a resolution if Hamas’ charter states that its committed to the destruction of Israel?
Why would hamas abandon the destruction of israel if everyday since 1948 israel has been committed to the extermination of palestinian people??? There will never be a two state solution, because israel refuses to give back the land they stole and will do anything to own all the land in the region, even if it means committing genocide.
lol well I know where you get your news from…fox, cnn…because that’s literally not true Hamas wants a two state solution they’ve said so for like a decade now.
Hamas offered to dismantle its military wing in exchange for a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders more than once in 1998, 2006 and 2007, but Israel did not agree because they simply do not leave something they have usurped by peace, but it is taken away from them by force, and offered again now, but of course there is no response from the side with the ideology of Greater Israel, which has demonstrations demanding settlements in Lebanon.
Hamas offered to dismantle its military wing in exchange for a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders more than once in 1998, 2006 and 2007, but Israel did not agree because they simply do not leave something they have usurped by peace, but it is taken away from them by force, and offered again now, but of course there is no response from the side with the ideology of Greater Israel, which has demonstrations demanding settlements in Lebanon.
@@AmiraMohamed-lt4iy If someone punched you in the face cause they hated you so u fight them back and you beat them up, and as ur leaving you take his watch, and then he comes back to beat you up again cause he hates you and u take all his money out of his wallet this time, and he does it again and this time you take his gold necklace, after u beat his ass of course, and he comes back and says "Ill stop harrasing you and attacking you and trying to beat you up if you give me my stuff back" what would you do? Are you, morally, in the wrong for saying "screw you, imma keep all ur stuff and beat you up again"?
Zionist And Netnyahu are not concerned about 2 state solution , but about one Zionist Jewish Palestine Free(possiblly Dead ) State instead , so hell no
This is the best video I've seen that highlights how exactly we got to this point. How shifts in support/care for Palestine over decades reached a boiling point which factored into Hamas' attack in Oct. 7. Really highlights the entire region well. Thank you for the information.
@@samfisher2306 unfortunately there is a lack of information here and it is tinged in bias and is not fully correct, but it certainly seems to be an objective video and his presented very nicely.
So many details are twisted or missing. Just a few of them: 2:30 calling the jewish immigrants, returning to their fatherland, who just escaped the holocaust basically with nothing a 'form of colonialism' is twisted. 9:55 'Israel rejected a peace deal'- there was never an actual peace deal offered to Israel at the time (or ever)+ you just skipped the fact the 90s gave rise to the most deadly terror attacks until then killing 100s of civilians. Generally there was no actual 'Palestine' before 67, it was Jordan and Egypt You keep mentioning that the peace treaties were 'against the will' of the arab citizens- since when arab countries have any consideration to their peoples will?
"returning to their fatherland", no part of Palestine is or was ever their land. They preceded to steal and violently displace/kill the native inhabitants (Palestinians) living there -- which is typical colonial behavior. 'Palestine' existed throughout all of human history even referenced in the most famous classical books including Shakespeare's Othello, debunking your entire "67" claim (misinformation propagated to justify genocide of Palestinians). Your opinions are clearly biased, ignoring historical facts, and based mainly on zionist propaganda.
Correction: In 1973 nobody invaded Israel. Egypt made a surprise attack on the IDF inside Egypt. Syria later attacked the IDF inside Syria. Both countries were trying to expel the IDF from Egypt and Syria respectively. Trying to expel an invading army from your country is the primary duty of any country's army. These attacks were not invasions of Israel or attacks on Israel. The 1973 war took place entirely inside Egypt and Syria.
9:39 "In the 2000s, Saudi Arabia proposed a deal where all members of the Arab League would recognize Israel if Israel withdrew completely from the West Bank, a version of what's known as the two-state solution. But Israel rejected it."
After 1948 Gaza belonged to Egypt and west bank to Jordan (as in the west west bank of the Jordan river) Egypt refused to take Gaza back. A convenient fact omitted.
@@olamid333 Some people are victims of propoganda, best to ignore them fully. They won't be convinced nor swayed towards the facts, Isreal isn't an angel state that has done no wrong, no country is full innocent in politics and war.
Well technically they did. Israel bombed out Egypts fields destroying most of their Air Force. That was the first kinetic act of the war. The Arab countries were staging and posturing about attack Israel…but technically Israel started it.
@@willneverstop it was a preliminary defensive strike in response to mobilization of massive amounts of troops and munitions into every one of their borders. As well as intelligence from communications interception that the invasion was imminent. Saying the started the war is foolish
“20 years later, Israel sparked another war” - odd, I didn’t know amassing Egyptian troops at the border, evacuating UN officials, and threatening trade routes via the Suez Canal was considered Israeli provocation. 2:52
Look, I am an old fart (mid 50's) and I read a lot and try to extract the truth from between the lines. You are doing a genuinely great job. I just recommended you to my 18 year old son. Kudos!
Compare coverage and stay informed on breaking news by subscribing through my link ground.news/searchparty. Take advantage of their Holiday sale to get 40% off unlimited access to all their features for just $5/month. Sale ends December 31.
Ok
The Arab league nations map you showed is incorrect. It’s missing Mauritania, Djibouti, Comoros islands and Somalia. Please correct this
@@AliA-yn4hk Its correct for the time period
Thank you for sharing our mission Search Party!
If anyone's interested in getting the full picture of issues like the one in this video, check out the link in the description and let us know if you have any questions.
What happens when turkey Iran and Afghanistan start playing nice?
What you've overlooked is that these governments also like that the issue between Israel and Palestine persists so that the public doesn't focus on the internal problems of their countries and stays fixed on these external issues.
You nailed it!
in order for Arab leaders to continue stealing, looting and killing their own people they must keep the people's minds pre-occupied that their is an external enemy and that enemy can never be defeated you can the leader of Syria for example whenever he talks about the situation in Syria he always says " their is a global conspiracy against us and we are fighting against that " but who is the enemy and what are they're motives? He never specifies instead he keeps saying this to give his pro-butt lickers something to cheer for and get behind
No one cares about that because most of these governments aren't genuine democracies which means they don't serve the people so why would they care about internal issues? Building the wealth of the rich and powerful is more important.
This is a double edged sword if it is true. Because once the extenal issue become so big and the government still takes no action, then the problem becomes internal and all the pressure is redirected towards the government. so the governments would have to walk a very fine line.
pretty accurate
It's the other way around bud. The people are the ones that want the governments to focus on the 'external' issues. This arguments is weak and mainly pushed by the governments themselves to silence the people, internal v. external issues is a paradigm the governments choose to separate issues that are otherwise totally linked. If the UAE benefits internally from an external issue, then this model is irrelevant, likewise if Egypt suffers internally from an external issue.
The only example where one can grant you a pass is Iran, but even there, this only apples to the IL-PS as the external issue... but there's the issue of embargoes from the west imposed on Iran, hugely impacting the internal situation there. So in the end, it still remains a moot argument with little to no bite to it.
This paradigm is only useful in massive superpowers where external issues only have a marginal effect on the internal situation, but no political entity in the middle-east is a superpower.
People seem to misunderstand the topic of the video:
This is a video about the Geopolitical relations between Israel and the Arab states, and how the conflict with Hamas makes them re question their relationships.
This video is NOT about the conflict or about who is right or wrong
Exactly. I'll go even further and say it doesn't even matter who's right or wrong. Israel wants peace and the Palistinians want to be free. That is the crux of the issue here.
@@Austin-vp6qq Gaza was free in 2005.. so maybe not all Palestinians want to be free.. but something else
@@gal2659free ?! can’t have an airport or a sea port or move in or out without a permit and you call this free ? What a delusional way to think about freedom.
@@Abdullah_Bajobair Looks like we got an expert here. Sorry, but you need to recheck what happened in Gaza in 2005, and whether it could have an airport or a sea port..
@@Abdullah_Bajobairthere literally was an airport in Gaza before Palestinians turned it into a terrorist base. Ignorant dummy
CORRECTION: at 15:40 I reported Search Party is celebrating over 230 subscribers. We are, in fact, celebrating over 230,000. I am deeply sorry for this grievous error and pledge to do better next time. Thank you all for watching :)
- Sam
It wasn't wrong though. You are indeed over 230 subscribers
hahaha@@leonkro
This video felt extremely one sided and biased. Completely ignores a lot of historical context and facts and unfortunately this is being passed on as ‘history’.
Your grievous error gave me a gentle chuckle. Horrifying, but you're forgiven this time.
@@melodicvirginia Yes, for example 11:00 The blockade in 2006 was specifically because “Hummus” was chosen by the people. The reporting on this video is heavily anti Isrl.
Vox, where he comes from, has done the same in recent videos.
Great video! Some small corrections:
1. While during the 1973 Yom Kippur war Israel did cross the Suez canal and made some gains during the final phase of the war, they withdrew back to the Asian side of the canal following a renewed ceasefire.
2. The audio said Anwar Sadat was killed by the military, but it was an organisation called the Egyptian Jihad that assassinated him. They disguised themselves as soldiers and opened fire at him while he was observing a military parade, ironically one commemorating his "victory" in the 1973 Yom Kippur war.
Regarding 2, Khalid al-Islambuli participated but it was not a military coup. it was one individual in the military working with others.
After renewed ceasefire egypt kept holding land they got during war (whole east side of canal) while israel withdrew from all land they got in this war.
Israel did not withdraw they they gave at back when the war ended,
Also that Hamas was founded in 1987 and not in the 70's
There was one more: around the 3 minute mark the narrator said the Arab states agreed to reject Israel "until it gave Palestinians land back." This is ignoring the fact that until 1967 Israel did not occupy the West Bank or Gaza and those countries attacked anyway. The modern public Arab position, that of wanting a two state solution, was adopted later.
In 1972, Sadat expelled 20,000 Soviet advisers from Egypt and opened new diplomatic channels with Washington, D.C., which, as Israel’s key ally, would be an essential mediator in any future peace talks. He formed a new alliance with Syria, and a concerted attack on Israel was planned.
The chief of Mossad from 1963 to 1968 Meir said”Egypt was not ready for war and nasser did not want war.”
@@thegreatprogressivemind788u must look at the speech he gave to the trade unionists😅
@@netaji-thebritishslayer what speech
A lot of people don't focus on the context of geopolitics. Awesome video. And happy six month! Congrats on the success!
Missing a few key details though to be fair
It's quite hillarious that he points out Israel took more land when they won the Yomkippur like DUHHHH don't you know how war works???? Or are scared of loosing millions of inbred fans
Ground really is an interesting sponsor. The Internet needed such news comparisons in one place a decade and few years ago
The lack of support from arab states was what baffled me the most ever since this conflict began. Thank you for this essay
they have their own host of issues...in addition to trying to dog pile isreal at times lol
Its because 1. They know Israel and obliterate them and 2. Its more in their favour for an Israeli state as it means Iran isn't focusing their entire projection into Arab states so it means they can focus on other things and building up defences against both Israel and Iran.
They went to war with Israel so not exactly. The US gives Israel blank cheques, pretty much.
Because all arabs countries ruled by traitors who work only for money they get from the west
Why ? when did Arab states helped them ?
'48 war was full of self interests and desires to annex territory (to Greater Syria aspiration or to Jordan, as the latter did, which isn't mentioned here, simply says "Arab control" in 02:45). Hell, the diversity is what made them lose that war.. Qawuqji couldn't stand El-Husseini, or Hassan Salame.. no co-ordination no nothing..
Palestinians themselves were divided with the extreme anti-partition policy led by El-Husseini, who were unfortunately the leading voice, against more moderates who were either pro-partition or up for discussion. Division even led to assassination of moderates like Sami Taha.
'73 war was to revenge for the '67 loss and gain territories back.
Some more Historical reasons why Arab leaders don't help them:
Jordan- 1951 King assassinated, guess by who. 1970 Black September.
Lebanon- 1975 dragged into an insane civil war partly/mostly (depends who you're asking) by Palestinian refugees. During this time, Syria also started having shakey relations with the Palestinians as a result.
Kuwait- Palestinian refugees supported Saddam during the invasion
Egypt- el-Sisi praying every night that Israel would finish Hamas. Can't stand them, they're a branch of the Muslim brothers, his worst enemies. Egypt co-decided and enforced the 2007 blockade for a reason.
They always tied themselves with the extreme leaders.. Saddam, Ghaddafi, Idi Amin, always looking to incite and cause troubles in other places..
The only Arabs that are helping are other Iran proxys.. and that's the only reason they're helping..
Why would Arab governments be dragged into a surprise war made by a bunch of psychos ? Arab leaders know well enough who Hamas are. They know exactly what happened in Gaza between 2005-2007 (which isn't mentioned in the video), and they know that since then, Gazans life is made miserable by Hamas. This war, is just another one in a line of wars between Hamas and Israel, which gained nothing but more poverty and desperation for Gazans. Everyone realize that when Hamas took over, they blew a great precedent for the West Bank to be free of Israeli occupation as well..
They know Hamas is also Qatarian funded, and if you'll dive into the recent Qatar diplomatic crisis, you'll get another reasons why Arabs aren't the biggest fans of this.
It's a weird headline for this video.. the Arab world was always split
Why Egypt and Jordan didn’t give the West bank and Gaza to the Palestinians while they owned it from 48 to 67?
Egypt and Jordan didn't need to give them what they already own, and they didn't build settlements that tries to steal the land like Israel is doing, and we shouldn't forget to mention these lands were connected politically and culturally for thousands of years so the Palestinians, Egyptians and Jordans belongs to the same nation
On the eve of the Yom Kippur war, Dovi, one of Marwan's handlers, told his bosses at Mossad that their mole in the Egyptian state demanded an immediate meeting between 4-5 October.
The meeting was “to give information of great importance… connected to the ‘chemicals’ in his possession”.
“Chemicals” was the code word for warnings about information concerning an impending war.
Sadat refused to sign a peace deal with Israel unless they kept the gaza and the west Bank in israeli control as he did not want the Palestinians in his country
Source: trust me bro
Source: trust me bro
@@valhex86 Sadat was a traitor though, because he switched allegiance from Soviets to USA
Jews have been kicked out of 109 and are despised by every culture on the planet. Fact
Was he a Russian? If he was an Egyptian then that is not treasonous it is smart.
I noticed this on Johnny Harris's vids, but I love how you have a tracker along the bottom of the ad breaks. It's very user friendly.
2:47 you forgot to mention the west bank was controled by jordan, and gaza by egypt.
Not the palestinians
Israel was controlled by British
I keep seeing pro-israel people say this as if its some kind of argument in their favor and don't understand why. could you please explain?
Well, people say that palestine isnt independent becuase of Israeli occupation. The point is that from 1948 up to 1967 the west bank and gaza were under arab control, meaning that if they really wanted a country in 48' borders like they claim they could have had it a long time ago...@@shway1
@@loofloof1441 oh, really? and israel would have accepted that and not taken it back like they did? but today they won't? makes perfect sense!
@@shway1 it would have had no choice, it was weak back then.... the only reason Israel captured these lands is because the arab countries planned and invasion against Israel, so Israel had to strike preemtively...
Also, a two state solution was offered to the paleatinians on several occasions, and all the offers were denied, even ones who are very close to the 48' borders.
Israel didn't take more lands from Egypt in 1973.
Missed an opportunity to clarify why israel is not a colonialist state; the jewish immigrants were not agents of Britain. Did not mention Arab or Jewish regional displacement, planned attacks leading up to the 6 Day War and various other points, including Hezbollah attacks on Israel and deeper explanations of geopolitical motivations. Content here is informative but incomplete.
Congratulations to you and your team on the first 6 months of Search Party 🎉
In 1967 didn't Egypt close off the Gulf of Aqaba to Israel shipping and the surrounding Arab nations mobilize their troops (similar fashion to Russia before they Invaded Ukraine)? That prompted Israel to be preemptive? This video cartwheels over a lot of details.. but I guess this topic can't be covered in full in 16mins.
Israel was never in danger in 67.
@@mussyegit would be really bad for Israel's trade and oil supply wdym?
@@mussyegha
5:07 it's not dominating because it's complicated there are many complicated things that aren't covered at all. It's because of antisemitism.
Marwan, the son-in-law of former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, told the then Mossad chief Zvi Zamir “there is a 99 percent chance that the war will start tomorrow… (Oct 6, 1973) it will start simultaneously on both fronts, the Egyptian and the Syrian”.
Those warnings were largely dismissed by the Israeli defence establishment. But they proved accurate.
THANK YOU. This was the contextual video on the middle east that I feel like has really been missing. I feel much better informed for having watched it.
I appreciate it.
Dude he oversimplified and missed so much stuff,not giving proper context.. he said that “Israel sparked the 6 day war” which is not how it really went down. Israel attacked preemptively as a response to Egypt and Arab armies amassing at the border. In other words, the Arabs were gettting ready to attack Israel
It’s not accurate and it is biased
Thank you for that salient and informative comment, user-hp2go6iw7 ... p? Good to see totally-human, non-bot interaction on YT still exists!
One important piece of context for the six day way is that Egypt and Syria were building up tanks and their armies on the Israeli border, and many of the key signs for war like soviet ambassadors leaving
Also that the Israeli population is primarily not European Jews anymore. The population is roughly 20% Arab, 45% Mizrach Jews(Middle Eastern/North African) and 35% Ashkenazi Jews (European). With if course Jews that don't fit any of these categories like Beta Israel from Ethiopia and Bene Israel from India.
The Non-Ashkenazis have been westernized since a while now. The fact that Israel is a Western base in the middle east and that its population has absolutely nothing in common (religiously, ideologically, culturally) with the rest of the region's populations is very difficult to contest.
@@martinmatino6253 What do you mean by "westernised"?
There's almost no difference between Lebanese Christians and Arab Israeli Jews in looks or their outlooks.
@@varsoo1doesn't change the fact israel is settler colonial project(zionist literally called themselves colonizers)and arabs are treated as second class citizens . Similar to south africa .
@@pixelpie5280 doesn’t change the fact that Arabs (some after 1948 began to call themselves Palestinians) tried to eradicate the xJe.ws since the 1800’s and one day one of Israel they along with 5 Arab countries sent their armies into Israel.
@@martinmatino6253 there are Christian Israelites and Christian Lebanese that look the same and have similar values. There use to be more Christian Lebanese but Palestinians in large number went into southern Lebanon and were a big factor in starting a war against the Christian Lebanese while also attacking Israel
One correction: at 2:50 you said that Israel sparked the 1967 six days war. While Israel did start the war it was only after Egyptian troops were mobilized to the border, and Abdel Nassar (the Egyptian President) declared he was going to wipe Israel off the map.
Which is a lie Isreali Generals admitted they attacked without provocation.
Thanks for that, I was wondering what was meant. It was a preemptive attack, according to what I've read.
The video attempts to portray Israel as the initiator of the conflict on multiple occasions. However, in reality, Israel was often provoked and responded in self-defense, which gradually escalated into larger conflicts. In most cases, Israel was not the aggressor.
Yesssss@@lust4life791
its actually true.
it being "pre-emptive" is a common misconception.
not egypt, nor jordan, nor syria were actually planning to attack israel.
This video is very misleading.
There is overemphasis on the connection between the Palestinian issue to domestic and strategic issues of many of the Muslim countries. There is no mentioned on the many peace agreement Israel has made with the Palestinians (accept for the Oslo accords) that were rejected by the Palestinians. There is no mentioned on the catastrophic attempts done by Palestinians to overthrow governments of countries that host them (Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt).
This video is trying to paint a picture, but it's not the reality.
They weren't "peace agreements", they were "do this for me so I don't start a war."
We NEED an updated video on the war on Gaza. You guys have such a great channel & I’m sure I’m not alone in wanting a current video.
9:22 again with your Palestinian land back which is wrong because they never had it. And Jordan making peace was a good thing don't make it bad because even more wasn't accomplished. Jordan can't negotiate on behalf of Hamas.
Really glad to see more coverage on this issue form a more macro lens POV and less from an emotional POV.
I feel like only with these kinds of large scale contexts can the conflict be inched towards peace, not with calls for the destruction of Gaza or for the abolition of the state of Israel, as these are coming more from a place of raw emotion and have no actual basis in real world context and implications
When lives are on the stake both parties can get emotional, but the important thing is to allow for that emotion blind you from truth about the genocidal campaigns dehumanisation and the apartheid regime
Your videos are so well made and your narration is extremely clear.
If only they were accurate and non biased
Your ad breakdown of ground news was probably the best I've seen from all the creators they sponsor
Simple Israel 🇮🇱 wants those arab countries part of lebanon 🇱🇧 plus jordan 🇯🇴 part of syria 🇸🇾 and little part of iraq 🇮🇶 too THEY WANT THE GREATER ISRAEL 🇮🇱
When he said factual and BBC in one sentence , I directly knew I would never use that ground app😂😂😂
Most of the BBC's reporting is competent?
@@nommsperhaps when it is about local affairs. But about when it is about the Israel-Hamas war you would need to watch all the time to catch their latest apologize for misinformation before you could trust it.
Apparently, getting a story first comes before getting it right.
@@nomms Outlets can be different on topics and audiences. Is the BBC factual in international coverage? Absolutely. Some of the best coverage in the world. How they're covering transgender rights in their own country? Absolute trash.
And it's not just them. Al Jazeera, for example. They do an excellent job covering much of the Mideast with an objective eye. They do great work there. Covering their home country of Qatar? Very different. Context matters in all aspects.
Both are government-funded outlets. They do maintain a lot of editorial independence, but there can always be a pain point where they could toe the line. Doesn't mean you can't rely on their coverage at all, but be smart in how you rely on it and understand where its coming from.
The BBC is very anti-Israel and cannot be trusted on that topic. Al Jazeera is a disaster. Some of their reporters actually held hostages in Gaza.
Kinda disingenuous to jump over the entire build up to the 6 day war and refer to it as "Israeli aggression", when the more accurate title would be "preemptive Israeli war"
its actually true.
it being "pre-emptive" is a common misconception.
not egypt, nor jordan, nor syria were actually planning to attack israel.
You forgot the issue that Palestinians have been extremely disruptive and negative for the governments that did help them. Muslim brotherhood meddling with secular Arabism in Egypt and Syria, ruining Lebanon from a peaceful multi religious Christian entity into the war torn mess it is today, the Jordanian assassinations against the former and attempted against the current king, they supported saddams war in Kuwait despite Kuwait being one of the few countries that let them in in massive numbers, and a few more incidents besides.
The Arab state are conscious and wary of Palestinians for good reason because they’ve done more damage than Israel has technically.
This was a basic amt of info about the conflict, with decent accuracy. I don’t think he has done enough research to speak about what you’re saying. Most people don’t know this, glad to see a few genuinely knowledgable commentators here.
The muslim brotherhood candidate won the elections fair and square in the 2011 egyptian elections
The majority of people wanted a muslim state in Egypt, which is why they voted for Morsi.
Also, that's a very big oversimplification of events that took place in Lebanon leading to its collapse: the PLO did play a part in it, but it wasn't the only reason the country collapsed (other reasons include sectarian tensions, the militias question, refusal to recognize palestinian immigrants as lebanese citizens, the overwhelming power that the president had over the cabinet, systematic corruption in every level of government, etc. Which issue was more important depends on which religious group you ask)
Arab puppet rulers don't represent the will of the people living there just because isreal is in bed with their rulers doesn't mean the people living there like the isrealis.
@@thisisforsteam2316
I'll tell you Lebanon's problem: it was a state which prioritised Christians over everyone else, established by France to serve France's interest against neighbouring Muslim countries.
@@موسى_7 still a better place than the mess it turned into today
I always thought Atlas was the best thing Vox ever produced. I loved what Sam did with it and elevated it once Johnny went to Borders. Atlas is in good hands still but there's now basically an 'Atlas-only' channel? Oh hell yes! Expect a comment along the lines of "this is my very favourite thing on TH-cam and I love it dearly, I will set aside time for it and look forward to watching each upload no matter the topic". Those sweet infographics and the welll-researched topics are Chef's Kiss. Did I mention this is and has from the outset, my very favourite series on TH-cam and I love it dearly? Because I do! You're the best Sam
Been binging every video from this channel. Everything is so well made and glad it came on my recommended
One of the best videos of this conflict I've seen. The colours you used on the graphics, especially the graphs, made this soooo much easier to follow than almost all similar channels. Great job.
you cant call it a conflict if one side has nuclear weapons, tanks, aircraft, artillary, and a standing army while the other has a small militia group in only the gaza strip
and they're backed by the united states, there is clearly a victim here
It’s not accurate so don’t rely on this info
Yeah the Arab world has always been split.. that’s why there are countries like Syria and Yemen that have been in a state of civil war for like over a decade
Are we really gonna completely gloss over everything leading up to the 6 day war in 67 and just say that Israel started it? All signs were pointing to an imminent invasion from Jordan and Egypt and Egypt had also blockaded the gulf of aqaba (which is literally an act of war...).
He DID say that Israel started it and I beg to differ. Israel took the first strike that is true, but Nasser was told a lie by the Soviets and surprise surprise it took off.
This is not the first time they have done this. I commented on this extremely biased selective presentation of the facts on a previous video they made where they also glossed over everything leading up to the 6 day war and simply blamed Israel. I'm glad to see others picking up on it.
This is not the first time they have done this. I commented on this extremely biased selective presentation of the facts on a previous video they made where they also glossed over everything leading up to the 6 day war and simply blamed Israel. I'm glad to see others picking up on it.
fr
It is not an objective video, although it is presented as such, and anyone who doesn’t know better will believe every word of it
Good shit Sam. Keep growing steadily so that you can hire more people and put out as many vids a month as Johnny. I’ve really been liking your work
dude what good video man wow great job
What a gem of a chanel, so glad I found it.
Throughout this Arab Monarchy
2:54 in 1967 Israel didn't spark a war Egypt did and Israel made a preemptive strike they legally gained the Sinai and Judea and Samaria in a defensive war.
preemptive strike -> starting a war. And yes, I know Nasser put 100.000 troops at the border, but the first attack was israeli.
"Great essay! However, I believe that starting the discussion of this issue with British colonialism is an oversimplification. The British only held control for 28 years, which is a relatively short period in the history of empires. Before that, the land had been under Ottoman Empire rule, and Jews had lived there for centuries. Ignoring this history, ignores another big part of this puzzle.
Jews didn't even make more than 5% of population under Ottoman rule.
Brits wooed Arabs to backstab Ottomans - a Muslim authority - in exchange for a large Arab state of their own but later backtracked. Not only did it backtrack, it offered Palestine to Jews in 1917.
Your mind is too simplistic to understand this conflict, especially the role of Brits.
European jews and African jews did migrate in groves though to new land of Israel. Which makes up majority today.
@@maquacr7014 Then we can go back further, before the Ottoman rule to the Muslim Conquest when 90,000 Christians were massacred. My point is that this area is millennia old and has been fought over many times. To blame it all on the Brits, who I'm not saying are innocent in this, and use words like "Colonialism," and disregard all this previous history and the historical importance of this land to so many of all religions and backgrounds, won't make solutions come any easier.
Also, we don't need a negative response. Debate is important and necessary. Don't make it a zero-sum game and throw around insults. It's counterproductive.
@@cookies1758 Which 90000 Christians were massacred? And where? Are you talking about Armenians?
I guess that does highlight the complexity of this history when we’re asking which 90,000. I was referring to the siege of Jerusalem in 636. I was going way back for that one. I’m curious I’ve been building a reading list to help myself understand all this, do you have any books, articles to recommend?
Thank you very much for your work!!
KGB created PLO trough Syria.... This still has impact 60 years later.
I’m sorry, but you fail to mention one very crucial fact. Jordan and Egypt rules the the West Bank and Gaza Strip from 1948 until 1967 and didn’t even think about establishing a Palestinian state. There are two main reasons for that, first they considered the Arabs living on those territories as an extra ion of their own nations. Such as Jordan annexing the West Bank, and secondly they had an issue with Israel existing at all.
Yes you should back to Europe
@@qaqawd8018 keep dreaming losers
@@qaqawd8018and it’s that kind of talk that will force you back to Arabia. Don’t start something you’ll end up regretting.
@@ymtzlgn no no I don't need to go back to Arabia cuz the cananeties arab is the first people live there will you European came here after the zionists bch movement understood??
So I am from the original people will you just like the white people who lived in South Africa
@@buffdadio1 we have ishell existing at all if you don't want to go back we should force you to go out it's Muslim Arab land
Sam you have delivered some really good stuff once again. Big ups 🙏
If only it was factual and not biased
While I appreciate the depth you get into here in this video and that you can't possibly include everything, there are multiple instances where you gloss or entirely skip over information that can help viewers build a more complete and accurate understanding and opinion on the subject.
Examples:
- when Wa'el says "mainly European Jews" at 2:15, no context or time frame is given, ignoring the fact that the 1948 deceleration of Israel resulted in all of the Arab countries expelling their Jewish populations and so already in 1950 the majority of Jews in Israel were not "European". Regardless, this also plays into (mostly antisemitic) tropes claiming that Jews have no historical connection to the land are are "white, European settlers".
- when talking about the early 2000s and peace between Israel and the Palestinians, ignoring the second Intifada as a potential reason for rejection of the Saudi peace plan, as well as the multiple peace initiatives and deals offered to the PA by Israel (for example Olmert agreeing to almost everything the wanted), makes it seem as if Israel rejected the only peace initiative, didn't initiate any themselves, and implies that Palestinians have no agency of their own.
Agreed
Despite what Sam Ellis claims to be an unbiased video, this video is extremely biased against Israel. Probably because all sources, left and right, like to be antisemitic. If he truly wanted to be unbiased, he wouldn't just invite Wa'el Alzayat, an outspoken anti-Israel propagandist, but he would also invite someone from the Israeli side to speak about the conflict. I'm quite disappointed.
@@andreimandelshtam1943 I don't think that "all sources" are antisemitic (and not all people who aren't "pro-Israel" are antisemitic). Western voices in academia and journalism tend to be biased for sure, though I don't think some fringe right-wing super pro Israel voice here would have balanced things out either.
As an Israeli, I found Wa'el to be pretty fair with what he was saying, not that I necessarily agreed with all his analysis. I just think that the perspective from which he was speaking was clearly a biased one, just like I would have regardless of how hard I tried to present things neutrally.
This isn’t accurate at all as anyone who has properly studied the early noughties history of the conflict
@@jsquire5pa would you care to be more specific as to what you are calling inaccurate? "this" could mean a lot of things.
4:21 you say Egypts peace treaty with Israel was seen as a betrayal because it didn't solve this problem (i.e. the Palestinian problem). That is again misleading the issue is they the other Arabs wanted the total destruction of Israel not just the areas you highlighted on the map on Judea and Samaria. Ok maybe you can get 30sec without being dishonest? Can you please?
IS IT NOT PEGASUS SPYWARE AND OTHER WORLD CONTROL TOOLS?
This video leaves out a lot of the history. Why not analyze the decision making of Palestinian leaders? The 2nd Intifada, a terror campaign orchestrated to make the Peace Process untenable.
Why not mention how Israel left Gaza? Unilaterally, you make it seem like Israel unreasonable wanting to leave the West Bank, when what happened with Gaza was purely a result of Israeli optimism.
If they want a two state solution they should pressure the Palestinians to accept the existence of Israel.
This video was meant to be 16 min and about how arab don’t support palastine nowadays, i couldn’t even think of a better way to clarify it,
And there was never a peace just to imagine a colonial body from west comming to middile east bcz west has been killing jews all over is ridiculous, plus Israel has been taking palastine and killing them over and over with west support how tf is it imaginable to think of peace
@@lewar_kurdi The Jews are the indigenous and native inhabitants of the land of Israel and there has always been a continuous Jewish presence there. The Jewish people had always been coming back to the land, despite its poverty and violence. This was a growing dynamic long before the Holocaust.
The "West" did not give the Jews the land because of the Holocaust, the Jewish population grew and demanded self-determination. It tried to coexist with Arabs but the Arabs killed Jews in Pogroms in the 1920s and that soured relations.
The West did not back the Jews, but the Arabs. The British always sided with the Arabs, they limited Jewish immigration, which would have saved millions during the Holocaust. They supported an Arab majority single state, before the Jewish Insurgency against the British forced them to leave the issue to the UN. When Israel declared independence, only Czechslovakia sold it weapons and they did that for opportunist reasons because they needed money after WW2. The British sold weapons to the Arabs and British officers commanded the Jordanian Arab Legion, the only competent Arab military force. Responsible for ethnically cleansing the Jews of Jerusalem, Judea, and Samaria. The leaders of Western countries embargoed Israel, they didn't care and wanted to keep buying Arab oil. This dynamic changed slightly when Socialist Ba'athist dictatorships took power in various Arab countries which pushed them towards the USSR and the US therefore towards Israel.
Israeli Arabs enjoy more right and freedoms than Arabs anywhere else in the Middle East. Israel offered Arabs citizenship, in 1948, there were even Arabs that fought for the IDF, most especially Bedouin, reaching the rank of Colonel.
The narrative should take into account how the Arab nations have always failed to support Palestinian people, trying to use them as tools against Israel to distract their own citizens from bad government and corruption. How they could have easily paid to help settle Palestinians who left their homes, with a single day of oil revenue, they could have settled permanently all Palestinian refugees. They didn't. Palestinian leaders today continue to insist on war against Israel, a national suicide, while live the good life as Billionaires in Qatar. Arabs need a better leader who is willing to work towards peace in good faith. In the early 2000s, Israel offered '67 borders and East Jerusalem, the PLO said no and started the 2nd Intifada, a campaign of terrorism and suicide bombings targeting innocent Israeli civilians, Jews, Druze, Arabs, and others. They could have had peace on the most generous terms imaginable, but they said no and resorted to terrorism. They reaped what they sowed.
I thought there were two odd ones: Israel 'sparking another war' in 67 and rejecting Saudi Arabia's ask for a Palestinian state are pretty questionable claims. That being said, I don't want to crash the conversation: it is really hard to give context on this issue and you've done a brilliant job.
Was looking for this comment. Saying Israel sparked the conflict isn’t accurate. They were responding to military build on their boarders from Syria, Egypt and Jordan. An attack was imminent.
It’s impossible to go over this history in 16 minutes.
Thé military build UP by their neighbors is due to the soviet informing that Israel is planning an attack
The chief of mossad from 1963 to 1968 Meir said”Egypt was not ready for war and nasser did not want war.”
@@thegreatprogressivemind788 I saw a documentary that said he didn't want one, but it had gotten away from him and he was worried about being assassinated by his officers if he did not.
Iran and Saudi Arabia came to an agreement this year and made peace with each other
They re-established diplomatic relations that they haven’t had for only a few years, that’s it, no extra peace that wasn’t present a decade ago or more
A number of inaccuracies and oversimplifications of 90s politics here…
Khomenei, we will never help Israel, . Well Israel gave weapon systems to Iran during its war with Iraq. Complex situation, eh
The intro is not right, you should have started from 1948
Did you watch the rest of the video?
Saying that the Israelis sparked another war in 1967 when all their neighbours moved military equipment to their borders is a very nice hot take. 02:50
It was a preemptive strike, not a war insinuated by the Israelis.
This sound like the argument another European power used to invade Ukraine.
@@sushil6509ukraine had been bombing crimea and the east since 2014, stop the cap
its actually true.
it being "pre-emptive" is a common misconception.
not egypt, nor jordan, nor syria were actually planning to attack israel.
11:00 The blockade in 2006 was specifically because “Hummus” was chosen by the people. The reporting on this video is heavily anti Isrl.
Hamas was funded by israel, dont forget that.
❤JESUS
WILL END ALL WARS IN JURUSALEM
IS JESUS BIRTH PLACE
AND JESUS PROMISE TO RETURN SOON
😅
please consider shortening the advertisements a tad. this channel and johnny’s are amazing but the ads are so long
2:49 correction: the word "sparked" isn't exactly accurate here. Yes, Israel hit first, but it did so as a preemptive maneuver against Egypt's air force, as its intelligence noticed Egypt and Jordan preparing their military for attack. There was going to be a war either way, Israel just chose to not be the sitting duck.
Egypt was not going to invade Israel, even an israeli general said this in an interview:
"we have to be honest with ourselves, Nasser (the president of Egypt in that time) was not going to invade us, WE decided to invade him"
(i don't remember the name of who said this, but if you search it up you'll find it)
That's why israeli air force shot down all the egyptian airforce in sinai in less than 2 hours, because they were not preparing themselves to go to war, THEY WERE NOT GOING TO INVADE ISRAEL.
As someone who's been searching a lot about middle eastern wars, especially the arab-israeli wars, i can already tell in the first five minutes that this video is pretty biased, pathetic.
the illusion that somehow “resistance” will further the Palestinian cause is laughable. Collaboration is the only way to peace for both sides
That's about as great as the explanation of the geopolitical conflict can get. Thank you for this wonderful and objective video.
Objective? LOL. Mentions that 1400 Palestinians were killed in retaliatory attacks in October 2023 but conveniently fails to mention it was in response to Hamas slaughtering over 3000 Israeli men, women, and children on October 7th.
It does seem wonderful but if one looks more closely, they can see that it is not unbiased, and it is not objective.
14:38 or maybe those countries recognize the justice of Israels cause? Why assume bad motives on their behalf? At least present some other possibilities.
This was a good basic overview of the history and I understand you can’t include everything but you could’ve mentioned the PLO and the fatah-Hamas conflict. The main thing though was that the main reason Israel didn’t accept the Arab peace initiative wasn’t the West Bank, it was that it would’ve included right of return to Israel proper.
Nearly 1/4 of this video is an ad 😑
Video is great as usual. I'd give a tiny suggestion, make the video divided by chapters (as it's called in TH-cam) that'll clearly demarcate different aspects and subtopics inside the video (also, it'll clearly mark the Sponsorship segment). That's just a tiny suggestion...
Edit: I wonder what you'll make in the next video (given it's Atlantic Ocean in there)
I think you overlooked the fact that in 2005 Israel completely withdrew from Gaza and dragged Jews living in Gaza out of their homes in hopes to make peace. Then the people of Gaza elected Hamas…
They were colonists and settlers. Most of Gaza wasn't born when Hamas was elected. Hamas was elected with only 30% of the vote. Hamas was also supported by Israel before it took over Gaza.
@@bloodfiredrake7259 whatever the Jews living in Gaza were, the Israeli government took them out so that they could attempt to make peace with the Palestinians living there. Are you trying to tell me that the people in Gaza don’t want Hamas as their leader? Why don’t you condemn Hamas for not taking care of their civilians? They never thought to build even one bomb shelter to protect against Israel’s supposed unwarranted attacks?
The fact that this video is 007 makes it all the better, lets go James Bond!
I don’t understand why they betrayed the Palestinians it a terrible situation
😢no mention that thousands of jews from all the Islamic states were expelled. They were Iraqi, Tunisian, Algerian citizens who had everything taken away because of their religion. I think its important to address that its not a hatred of Israel, but a hatred of all Jews. Strange how media seems to omit this. Israel hasn't been the nice guy, but its not the state of Israel that Hamas is trying to wipe out, its the Jewish population they are trying to wipe out.
Expelled after terror attacks by Zionist militias
Didn’t mention that israel helped in the expulsion.
You left out the fact that Israel withdrew from Gaza completely in 2005. Small but important detail.
I can't grasp the cognitive dissonance that you must have to believe that the withdrawal is a gesture of peace, despite it being coupled by an illegal blockade on air, sea, and ground. Israel made Gaza an open air prison and you dare to portray that with a positive view ?
the withdrawal holds no importance whatsoever.
He left a lot of details out and colored other details, but didn’t color the rest
Nice video. But 2:52 wording could have been better instead of “Israel sparked another war”. Yes They launched pre-emptive strike but after iraq egypt and jordan mobilized their armies on their border. More context would have helped to first time viewers
Didnt even mention the internal Israel politics leading up to it with the increased settlements, the attack in judiciary and bibi own indictments
Very informative. Thank you.
you still didn't answer the question though " do you condemn hamas for what it did on october the 7th?"
Do you?
No mention on how in 2005 Israel left the Gaza Strip exactly because of the Mutual Disengagement plan. Israel kept their part of the bargain, but what did the Palestinians do? Voted Hamas in to power in 2005 and by 2006 they were in complete control.
yep, and im think that if they kept going in the right peaceful way, Palastine would benefits today west bank on their control and maybe other lands too
@@fierceharpy4636 there could be peace if anyone wanted it, but the Palestinians do not. You can ask them they will tell you straight up or you can read their charters.
@@user-hp2go6iw7p i know bro. even if israel gouvernement is not innocent but Palestinians also are responsible of what is happening to them. they should acknowledge israel as a state and stop this nonsense of the whole area is palestine. but they will never do that and they are condamn to keep suffering until Israel is weakened, unfortunately.
This skips the multiple peace deals offered by Israel to the Palestinians which were rejected by their leaders the most recent of which was 2008
Rubbish. Israel is the one who financially propped up Hamas in order to rival the more recognized PLO and to create division within Palestine and thwart a future state. Israel then agreed to relinquish stolen Palestinian land and halt their settlements in OSLO but instead they kept every inch and expedited their illegal settlements far into previously agreed upon Palestinian Territories and with brutal violence. Once you stop reading Israeli propaganda and do your own research you will feel better about knowing the truth
See, these deals only benefited Israel. They were rejected because it was a bad deal for the Palestinians
If the peace deal's is offering slavery! How you will call it a peace treaty? Isreal rejected more then Palestines! All have sympathies for isreal but not knowing they refuses any Palestine state!
2:42
No... not under "Arab control"... it was annexed to Jordan and Egypt...
Correction: The Saudi-Israeli agreement was on difficult terms to the zionist entitythat were requested by the Palestinian Authority (Fatah), including a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders, but because Hamas was not part of the agreement, it carried out the attacks to be an active party in it, and this is what Hamas leaders said several days after the attacks that they are ready to open the political path to agreement and recognition of the Zionist entity
For someone uneducated on the subject this might seem like a fair recap of historical events. It is not.
* Israel did not start the 1967 (six day war), Egypt did by closing the Straits of Tiran (an act of war), kicking out UN peace keeping force in Sinai and mobilizing on the border.
* Israel invasion of Southern Lebanon was preceded by numerous terror attacks from PLO based in Southern Lebanon.
* Israel did offer the WB back to Jordan during the peace talk, they didn't want it.
* For that matter, Israel also offered the Gaza and over 92% of the WB (2000 Camp David). The Palestinian leadership (Yasser Arafat) refused. In 2008, Ehud Olmert offered Gaza and over 99% of the WB (with territorial swaps) and parts of East Jerusalem. The Palestinian leadership (Mahmoud Abbas) just walked out on it.
* The blockade of the Gaza strip only began *after* Hamas took over, not before.
@Search Party
It's important to cover this.
Cherry picking facts it's not telling the true. What Israel is doing is colonizing and war crimes. The UN said it so many times.
@BDB I've also pointed out their errors and the act that the content creator said "Israel sparked another war" set me off. I'm old enough to remember that war, and its been endlessly discussed and analyzed by people smarter than him. FFS
So many of your points are outright lies. Absolute Israel propaganda. Funny how you frame Israel giving crumbs to the Palestenian people as good will actions. Or how you frame resistance as terror attacks, but not the much more common, deadly and brutal Israel attacks.
Just read your sentences. Arabs are bad for "starting" the 1967 war. But Israel isn't bad for starting the war against Lebanon. Arab resistance is terrorism and bad. Israel genocide can't be bad and is actually defense. The powerful is allowed to genocide, terrorize and murder hundreds of thousands, while the weak isn't even allowed to throw stones back.
Whenever Israel talks, it reads exactly like Russia talking about Ukraine, English in Ireland, French in Algeria or Third Reich in Poland. Exact same words. Genocide, apartheid and settler colonialism. Of course Israel will pretend to give things back, and then claim Palestenians refused it. The powerful always do this obvious move. You have to be very stupid to fall for it.
There will never be peace in the Region while Israel exists. Even after you kill all Palestenians, their brothers will remember. The only road for peace if the abolishment of Israel and the creation of ONE state for all christian, jewish, and muslim natives. Like christian, jewish, and muslim Palestinians been asking for decades.
Also they didn't mention they can't give back the Golan Heights to Syria as they are still not in peace and would be a death sentence for all people living within a 100km radius from the heights due to modern artillery.
At the end of the video, you say that the Arab countries want some sort of resolution to this Palestinian situation. How can there be a resolution if Hamas’ charter states that its committed to the destruction of Israel?
How can there be a resolution if we accept european colonialism?
Why would hamas abandon the destruction of israel if everyday since 1948 israel has been committed to the extermination of palestinian people??? There will never be a two state solution, because israel refuses to give back the land they stole and will do anything to own all the land in the region, even if it means committing genocide.
@@carlitos366 you need to take a history class and get educated about the issue.
Hamas is not concerned about 2 state solution, but about one Arab-Islamic state instead, so hell no.
lol well I know where you get your news from…fox, cnn…because that’s literally not true Hamas wants a two state solution they’ve said so for like a decade now.
Hamas offered to dismantle its military wing in exchange for a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders more than once in 1998, 2006 and 2007, but Israel did not agree because they simply do not leave something they have usurped by peace, but it is taken away from them by force, and offered again now, but of course there is no response from the side with the ideology of Greater Israel, which has demonstrations demanding settlements in Lebanon.
Hamas offered to dismantle its military wing in exchange for a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders more than once in 1998, 2006 and 2007, but Israel did not agree because they simply do not leave something they have usurped by peace, but it is taken away from them by force, and offered again now, but of course there is no response from the side with the ideology of Greater Israel, which has demonstrations demanding settlements in Lebanon.
@@AmiraMohamed-lt4iy If someone punched you in the face cause they hated you so u fight them back and you beat them up, and as ur leaving you take his watch, and then he comes back to beat you up again cause he hates you and u take all his money out of his wallet this time, and he does it again and this time you take his gold necklace, after u beat his ass of course, and he comes back and says "Ill stop harrasing you and attacking you and trying to beat you up if you give me my stuff back" what would you do? Are you, morally, in the wrong for saying "screw you, imma keep all ur stuff and beat you up again"?
Zionist And Netnyahu are not concerned about 2 state solution , but about one Zionist Jewish Palestine Free(possiblly Dead ) State instead , so hell no
Beautiful....this is just amazing...from Johnny Harris...good job..subscribed
Also, how did hamas "begin to govern the gaza strip in 2006"? BEBAUSE ISRAEL WITHDREW ONE SIDEDLY FROM THE AREA AND GOT BACK NO PEACE
This is the best video I've seen that highlights how exactly we got to this point. How shifts in support/care for Palestine over decades reached a boiling point which factored into Hamas' attack in Oct. 7. Really highlights the entire region well. Thank you for the information.
I had an okay knowledge prior to this informative breakdown too. Makes sense where things currently stand unfortunately.
@@samfisher2306 unfortunately there is a lack of information here and it is tinged in bias and is not fully correct, but it certainly seems to be an objective video and his presented very nicely.
Is it me or Palestinians are treated as fifth class citizens pretty much by all the neighboring countries??
Treated better in Israel than in them, too.
go see what happen when the neighboring countries accepted to taken in palestinians and you will see why
No one wants them
where do I see that? @@JR47846
Care to elaborate @@JR47846
I like this youtuber narratives. it sure makes history funny.
"sparked a war"???? It was a response to Egypt closing the strait to Israel
Israel didn't start the 6 day war. Egypt did with the block of the straits of Tiran.
So many details are twisted or missing. Just a few of them:
2:30 calling the jewish immigrants, returning to their fatherland, who just escaped the holocaust basically with nothing a 'form of colonialism' is twisted.
9:55 'Israel rejected a peace deal'- there was never an actual peace deal offered to Israel at the time (or ever)+ you just skipped the fact the 90s gave rise to the most deadly terror attacks until then killing 100s of civilians.
Generally there was no actual 'Palestine' before 67, it was Jordan and Egypt
You keep mentioning that the peace treaties were 'against the will' of the arab citizens- since when arab countries have any consideration to their peoples will?
"returning to their fatherland", no part of Palestine is or was ever their land. They preceded to steal and violently displace/kill the native inhabitants (Palestinians) living there -- which is typical colonial behavior.
'Palestine' existed throughout all of human history even referenced in the most famous classical books including Shakespeare's Othello, debunking your entire "67" claim (misinformation propagated to justify genocide of Palestinians).
Your opinions are clearly biased, ignoring historical facts, and based mainly on zionist propaganda.
They teach you this in israel?
Correction: In 1973 nobody invaded Israel. Egypt made a surprise attack on the IDF inside Egypt. Syria later attacked the IDF inside Syria. Both countries were trying to expel the IDF from Egypt and Syria respectively. Trying to expel an invading army from your country is the primary duty of any country's army. These attacks were not invasions of Israel or attacks on Israel. The 1973 war took place entirely inside Egypt and Syria.
The fuck?🤨
@@עומרגולן-ל4דhis stupid dw, that is an invasion
9:39 "In the 2000s, Saudi Arabia proposed a deal where all members of the Arab League would recognize Israel if Israel withdrew completely from the West Bank, a version of what's known as the two-state solution. But Israel rejected it."
False. They never got every country to agree to it. Israel rejected it because the Palestinians themselves did not accept it.
@@noamsitbon8151 source: trust me
After 1948 Gaza belonged to Egypt and west bank to Jordan (as in the west west bank of the Jordan river)
Egypt refused to take Gaza back.
A convenient fact omitted.
2007 olmert asked musa to meet to talk about the arab leauge offer and was refused. it was their way or the highway.
3:04 "Israel sparked another war" You must be joking.
huh?
1967 Israel attacked the Arab nations.
@@olamid333 Some people are victims of propoganda, best to ignore them fully. They won't be convinced nor swayed towards the facts, Isreal isn't an angel state that has done no wrong, no country is full innocent in politics and war.
Well technically they did. Israel bombed out Egypts fields destroying most of their Air Force. That was the first kinetic act of the war. The Arab countries were staging and posturing about attack Israel…but technically Israel started it.
@@willneverstop it was a preliminary defensive strike in response to mobilization of massive amounts of troops and munitions into every one of their borders. As well as intelligence from communications interception that the invasion was imminent. Saying the started the war is foolish
"As Israel bombs Gaza"?
Can you pls explain thourouly what happend that led into that?
Can you as well say what happened that led to all of this mess? It goes back to maybe even before you were born.
75 years of isreali apartheid
@@life-sf1ozI'm South African pls don't use that word, what Israel is doing its not Apartheid
@@Jbkeditznot your choice, it is a apartheid.
“20 years later, Israel sparked another war” - odd, I didn’t know amassing Egyptian troops at the border, evacuating UN officials, and threatening trade routes via the Suez Canal was considered Israeli provocation. 2:52
They also said that Israel refused a peace deal during olso era
Look, I am an old fart (mid 50's) and I read a lot and try to extract the truth from between the lines. You are doing a genuinely great job. I just recommended you to my 18 year old son. Kudos!