Duh. He is a criminal lawyer and does tasks that mainly deal with human emotions and life/death. The reason why conventional lawyers appear dull and condescending is that corporate lawyers deal with extremely mundane work which revolves around transactional work and due diligence etc. It is very boring
Met him once for a talk held by my school and had the chance to talk to him for a brief moment. Truly a really genuine guy who wants to help society at large.
What a personality! I could listen to him go on and on. If he was my professor, I would hate to miss any of his lectures. He is articulate and gives clear and concise explanations. With that demeanour, I bet he's a cool person to hang out with. Very chill and has no airs about him. Hope to see him in more content!
I like this man! He’s obviously a very intelligent man. He also has the ability to explain complex topics in a simplistic form, and with a good sense of humor to boot. That is actually a relatively rare ability.
Interesting fact dogs cannot eat chocolates. They can die if they were to eat one. When he was doing the re-enactment with the dog i was abit worried if the dog would lunge forward and eat the chocolate lol. I guess he would be guilty of a murder charge on an animal hahahaha
Actually, dogs do not die until they eat a certain amount. I know of dogs that survived to old age after downing a small chunk of chocolate when the owner is not looking. But of course, dont be silly and feed dogs with it la.
Excellent content mothership! More of such educational informative content please. Less of the silly bo liao kind. Would be nicer with a narrator overlay for the questions so that i can listen to this without watching the video. If got podcast version will be nice as well.
Wow! Clear and simple explanation. Hope he conducts lectures for our junior lawyers! Many study in UK and come back but can’t even speak proper English or understand all the law terminology 😒
I think it's really interesting with the self defense. Here in Germany we have the principle, that the victim doesn't need to accept a physical confrontation with an unclear ending. So the victim is allowed to use the most effective way to protect him- herself, even this means to shoot or stab the unarmed attacker, with the intention to kill. I wonder what would be the argument behind the self defense restriction in Singapore.
I am not a layer, but guess is to prevent people from plotting & using "self-defense" as a loophole to kill another and escape capital punishments... Imagine somebody wanting to kill a person not wanting to face capital offense. All he has to do is purposefully & continually verbally provoking the other until he/she couldn't take it & moved her barehand (likely to slap/punch). Then the provoker can just smash the victim's head with a brick causing death, and calls it "self-defense" (Example not be perfect, but hope you can get my point)... Also, guns & arms are illegal in Singapore & nobody carries them (except for police, or soldiers on official missions). And illegal guns & arms are extremely rare in Singapore too. Thus also can't use the excuse to say worried a layperson will shoot at you, thus you go on excessive self-defense.
@@limwowo5902 False. U failed to account for the fact that u have been looking at an iceberg. Most of the sexual offences are not from NUS nor the rich, as a matter of fact they are from non-unis such as secondary school, ITEs and Polys to begin with. The difference? Their cases only receive "internal disciplinary action" while NUS cases are reported to the police and then the media makes it viral. Even for the poly ite cases that managed to get reported, all receive probation just like those from NUS. Let me remind you, the grp of 20+ perverts getting caught at once wasnt from NUS, the bulk of toilet perverts also werent from NUS, the 40 thousand perverts in SG Nasi Lemak telegram werent from NUS. Not to mention, an NUS case or a case by a rich person often gets amplified and will go viral because the media will constantly leverage on selling stories propagating skewed catchy narratives sheeps like you want to hear. In addition, the quality of the defence attorney's argument makes a difference. Seems like u learn nothing from this video and just bring along ur bias.
Question: what if you are already convicted but there is new strong evidence that you did not commit the murder but you already spend time in prison on death row what would happen then?
Appeal first, process takes fucking long if you don't have money. If appeal succeeded you will be released. I'm not sure if you'll be paid for the time spent, in certain countries you are paid if you are wrongly convicted for serious crimes.
Get a good lawyer to turn in the new evidence and hope for the best (release), no compensation will be provided by the court in Singapore. However in US for example, it’s considered a miscarriage of justice and some sort of monetary compensation will be given
you can try to either, appeal to the court of appeal and wait for the results for years maybe? if success , then you’ll get a lighter sentence or maybe even no sentence? or either they’ll lighten your sentence or release you .
@@techgamerboy8807 my Question that "you" are 100% innocent with the new evidence but u are already convicted and are on death row what then any justice for you.
a contractor that scammed my mum of over 60k, went to him to get represented. sadly couldn't get the money back because that fucker deleted all the incriminating evidence.
What is the best defence legally for me if I’m cornered in the toilet by a guy and I injured him badly? Should I record our conversation in the midst of the incident or call the police on loudspeaker? Assuming there’s no witness.
You can try to prove that you were acting in self defense by calling the police but I believe this may be difficult considering you are in a fearful situation and do not have the chance to pick up your phone to record/call without the guy knowing. However, please do note that recorded teleconversations may not be used as an official proof in court as voices can be tempered with and it’s difficult to prove to the court which voice belongs to who (even though it may seem obvious to you). Calling the police may be the best option considering there are no witnesses
Jailed criminal turned self-taught criminal lawyer in jail. Respect and salute! I think he is oso the only Singapore lawyer with the longest hair ... heh heh.
As a Malaysian, I believe that some crimes deserve the death penalty for nothing else can be called justice served. At the same time i am opposed to it here in Malaysia because the system has many issues where the chances exist for one to be wrongly tried under capital laws snd ending up on death row. When we talk about the state forfeiting a life of a person, than the bare mininum requirement should be that the proof and evidence produced at a trial showed beyond a shadow of doubt that the accused is guilty. Interestingly, if one can recall the 80's and 90's, news reports on people convicted and sentenced to death usually carried the words " was sentenced to death after it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that.......". Sec 300 (d) - No dead body to proof that the person is actually dead, let alone proof that the person was murdered. Now no dead body to proof that a person is dead and not in hidding or chose to disappear for any rhyme or reason. Assuming is dead, but again no way to proof cause of death. Could be suicide, could be natural, could be accidental. So assumption on top of an assumption. And a person can still be convicted and sentenced to death on fundamentally what are assumptions and not solid evidence. This is an example why the anti death penalty proponents and their rguments cannot be denied. For there is no difference between an act of murder and the execution of a person guilty of murder otherwise.
It's amazing how sophisticated humans can be in their violence. "Okay, doctor, is he good to go leh?" "Nah, he has hypertension, you can't cane him" "Ah, oke, we'll take him back to his cell."
see 6:52, defense 4! it explains self-defense as a possible exception to a murder charge. the balancing factor is whether the self-defense is believed to be disproportionate or not, or at least that’s what i understand from it 😅
You can think of it as a two stage analysis! To be acquitted you must either (1) show that the section 300 charge is not established or (2) show that you have a valid defence (e.g. self defence). It is two stages because having a valid defence doesn't mean you didnt commit the offence. For instance, as long as you intentionally hit the guy in the head, it is generally sufficient to show you have committed a section 300(c) offence. But you can escape conviction by showing that you only did so because you were in danger (self-defence). So technically the self-defence issue only comes in at the second stage. But of course in real life the facts are not as clear and you could argue there was no intention to hit the guy's head in the first place - if so you can escape conviction at the first stage.
I can't get over how his dog is named "Ba Zhang" because i keep translating it into "巴掌" and I keep imagining the man saying "你给我过来，我给你一巴掌" and just hands you a dog- other than that, great video-
Glad to see an actual expert talking about Singapore Law, rather than the boomers who think they're lawyers because they read a whatsapp forwarded message once.
The term Double Jeopardy? How does it really apply in the court of law lets say a murder case? Eg, He is at first acquitted but later down the track there is a new evidence to charge him. Will he face a new trial? Thank you.
Hi just wanted to know, about the murder case at boon keng where a 16year boy killed his 'gf' husband, & at crime watch show his face & name. Correct me if im wrong, where 16 at the point of the murder. Is there any difference in terms of case? Since both os murder, 1 can be disclose & 1 cannot...
Convicting the accused of murder without the murder weapon AND the recovery of body is a weak case. Many accused persons were wrongfully executed as a result in several countries.
This is ridiculous. They need to get rid of that 'sudden fight' clause. A group of violent offenders each get less than four years for beating an innocent passerby to death. Life is so cheap in this country.
I disagree with the matching force argument because not everyone is physically equal. When someone has the ill intention to kill you, they can do that even with bare fist. So why do I have to risk my own safety to take a fair fight while I could end it quickly with an overwhelming method that I carry and safely get home to my family? The person that attempts to assault has already chosen to give up their self defense right. Take an example of how US police officers take down knife wielding suspects with a gun, or would you rather prefer them to wrestle the suspect?
PROBATION OFFICERS :don't worry we will keep ur case confidential nobody will know.. THE JUDGE:WELL YOU SEE THIS THIS THIS AND THAT HOW HE GOT CAUGHT AND HIS NAME IS.....
I remember law student Sunny Ang who was convicted of murder of his girlfriend. Her body was never found but he was hanged in 1967. He was a classmate of my brother and have visited us a few times.
@@Lololol555x I wont be able to tell you how he was as a person but he was soft spoken and looked like a nice guy. This from my memories around 1962/63. Are you in family with him?
@@Lololol555x I knew of a guy that hacked his girlfriend to death in Norway but he was a prick. He was so false that only women believed the lies he told.
Okay this is what I understand ah.... 300(a) the convicted individual had the intention to let say use rope to strangle the victim to death. (Like yeah shiok ah this person finally die) As for 300 (c), you freaking hate person A for whatever reasons and you decided to use a knife and stab him/her. At this point, you already have the intention to cause injury to person A. The area you stab is not at vital spots and not very deep and/or multiple times, originally they wouldn't die. But somehow that person cmi and die, then u kena 300 (c) lor. Disclaimer: Might not be 100% right
Self defense implies threat as it means to defend against assault. Provocation could be sb threatening the accused / accused's closed ones, but needn't be. It could even just be like "taking ur item without permission" that is also a form of provocation not amounting to assault.
![ฮักเทื่อสุดท้าย - บอย ศิริชัย [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-1PoPoQ-B-k/mqdefault.jpg)
Note: The clips used at 1:15 - 1:19 and 11:11 - 11:14 of the video are from Supreme Court Singapore.
He's such a COOL LAWYER, one of a kind in SG, setting him apart from the conventional dull ones.
Duh. He is a criminal lawyer and does tasks that mainly deal with human emotions and life/death. The reason why conventional lawyers appear dull and condescending is that corporate lawyers deal with extremely mundane work which revolves around transactional work and due diligence etc. It is very boring
Met Josephus at a community talk, liked how he's always able to catch the room with his charisma and be willing to share about his past
Indeed he’s extremely charismatic
Him eating a KitKat without breaking it in 2 is worthy of a case itself
He is a good talker.
I would like to hear him evaluating and explaining real life cases, not only murder but also other serious cases.
Met him once for a talk held by my school and had the chance to talk to him for a brief moment. Truly a really genuine guy who wants to help society at large.
But he joined PAP not PSP.
@@andrewsitu3472 Sometimes you gotta Pay And Pay for a good lawyer
Wow
At least he is ways much better than most of the losers out there consuming the weak and poor people or families.
A lawyer who can be trusted.
As a law student, he explained it so well and clear. Thank you Mothership for this video, it’s great to share such information with the public
Amazing. I thought he is a ah beng. Once Words come out of the mouth of this guy straight away i know is professional
ppl is model ok. go check his wiki photo.
Used to be an ah beng.
He's ok. But have you seen a chinese gangster that looked intimidating when you see his eyes?
Being ah beng gives a guy better experience to be a good lawyer, having gone through jail, trial and more.
@@28excellent not necessarily true. you can still be a doctor for AIDS if you've never had that.
Josephus would be a good teacher tbh
What a personality! I could listen to him go on and on. If he was my professor, I would hate to miss any of his lectures. He is articulate and gives clear and concise explanations.
With that demeanour, I bet he's a cool person to hang out with. Very chill and has no airs about him.
Hope to see him in more content!
I like this man! He’s obviously a very intelligent man. He also has the ability to explain complex topics in a simplistic form, and with a good sense of humor to boot. That is actually a relatively rare ability.
I enjoyed the part where he was talking to his dog. More like teasing the little cutie. Pitiful !
He already say he is showing what code 300(b) is..
He's a dangerous man, just look at the way he eats his KitKat
terrifying.
I eat my KitKat like that too what’s the matter
@@randomminecraftplayer6857 oh no another one
@@randomminecraftplayer6857 you need help.
@@randomminecraftplayer6857 same
Interesting fact dogs cannot eat chocolates. They can die if they were to eat one.
When he was doing the re-enactment with the dog i was abit worried if the dog would lunge forward and eat the chocolate lol.
I guess he would be guilty of a murder charge on an animal hahahaha
Murder based on reverse provocation. Provoke the dog to bite the choco.
Actually, dogs do not die until they eat a certain amount. I know of dogs that survived to old age after downing a small chunk of chocolate when the owner is not looking.
But of course, dont be silly and feed dogs with it la.
maybe not a real chocolate.
Oh hello, a video that is concise, filled with facts, interesting and at times funny?
Now this is content I am happy to watch more of! Great stuff
Excellent content mothership! More of such educational informative content please. Less of the silly bo liao kind. Would be nicer with a narrator overlay for the questions so that i can listen to this without watching the video. If got podcast version will be nice as well.
Get this man his own TH-cam channel!
Wow! Clear and simple explanation. Hope he conducts lectures for our junior lawyers! Many study in UK and come back but can’t even speak proper English or understand all the law terminology 😒
He looks like a silat master.
Haha!
3:00 I was so nervous imao
🤐😭
Nothing beats learning something new and interesting from an enthusiastic individual. Thank you, Mr Tan. It's a good day for knowledge!
Oh wow, is he wearing coloured contacts?
I think it's really interesting with the self defense. Here in Germany we have the principle, that the victim doesn't need to accept a physical confrontation with an unclear ending. So the victim is allowed to use the most effective way to protect him- herself, even this means to shoot or stab the unarmed attacker, with the intention to kill. I wonder what would be the argument behind the self defense restriction in Singapore.
I am not a layer, but guess is to prevent people from plotting & using "self-defense" as a loophole to kill another and escape capital punishments... Imagine somebody wanting to kill a person not wanting to face capital offense. All he has to do is purposefully & continually verbally provoking the other until he/she couldn't take it & moved her barehand (likely to slap/punch). Then the provoker can just smash the victim's head with a brick causing death, and calls it "self-defense" (Example not be perfect, but hope you can get my point)... Also, guns & arms are illegal in Singapore & nobody carries them (except for police, or soldiers on official missions). And illegal guns & arms are extremely rare in Singapore too. Thus also can't use the excuse to say worried a layperson will shoot at you, thus you go on excessive self-defense.
4:38 Famous murder case charged under circumstantial evidence will be Sunny Ang and his girlfriend
But if I'm from NUS then how?
free and easy. if your lao bei rich even better
@@limwowo5902 False. U failed to account for the fact that u have been looking at an iceberg. Most of the sexual offences are not from NUS nor the rich, as a matter of fact they are from non-unis such as secondary school, ITEs and Polys to begin with. The difference? Their cases only receive "internal disciplinary action" while NUS cases are reported to the police and then the media makes it viral. Even for the poly ite cases that managed to get reported, all receive probation just like those from NUS. Let me remind you, the grp of 20+ perverts getting caught at once wasnt from NUS, the bulk of toilet perverts also werent from NUS, the 40 thousand perverts in SG Nasi Lemak telegram werent from NUS. Not to mention, an NUS case or a case by a rich person often gets amplified and will go viral because the media will constantly leverage on selling stories propagating skewed catchy narratives sheeps like you want to hear. In addition, the quality of the defence attorney's argument makes a difference. Seems like u learn nothing from this video and just bring along ur bias.
@@johnwig285 too much information, shut your pie hole
@@comraderasily4313 dont blame others for ur inability to read long comments. Besides, facts dont care abt ur feelings.
@@johnwig285 you missed the joke bro
So interesting! You should go act in Code of Law!
hands down coolest lawyer W
Really fun yet informative video.. Well done. Thanks!
Question: what if you are already convicted but there is new strong evidence that you did not commit the murder but you already spend time in prison on death row what would happen then?
Appeal first, process takes fucking long if you don't have money. If appeal succeeded you will be released. I'm not sure if you'll be paid for the time spent, in certain countries you are paid if you are wrongly convicted for serious crimes.
@@reveirg9 simply said you are screwed if you are wrongly convicted.
Get a good lawyer to turn in the new evidence and hope for the best (release), no compensation will be provided by the court in Singapore. However in US for example, it’s considered a miscarriage of justice and some sort of monetary compensation will be given
you can try to either, appeal to the court of appeal and wait for the results for years maybe? if success , then you’ll get a lighter sentence or maybe even no sentence? or either they’ll lighten your sentence or release you .
@@techgamerboy8807 my Question that "you" are 100% innocent with the new evidence but u are already convicted and are on death row what then any justice for you.
He is the man you are gonna hire if you are in the dark side.
a contractor that scammed my mum of over 60k, went to him to get represented. sadly couldn't get the money back because that fucker deleted all the incriminating evidence.
What is the best defence legally for me if I’m cornered in the toilet by a guy and I injured him badly? Should I record our conversation in the midst of the incident or call the police on loudspeaker? Assuming there’s no witness.
Oddly specific :/
You can try to prove that you were acting in self defense by calling the police but I believe this may be difficult considering you are in a fearful situation and do not have the chance to pick up your phone to record/call without the guy knowing. However, please do note that recorded teleconversations may not be used as an official proof in court as voices can be tempered with and it’s difficult to prove to the court which voice belongs to who (even though it may seem obvious to you). Calling the police may be the best option considering there are no witnesses
ah beng lawyer 😍
I get it why Singapore is a safe country.
"This is my partner in crime Ba Zhang." > Instant like
Jailed criminal turned self-taught criminal lawyer in jail. Respect and salute! I think he is oso the only Singapore lawyer with the longest hair ... heh heh.
I’d love to have him as a law professor.
This is a good informative video.
You are a cool lawyer. Thank you for explaining how the law works with regards murder charges. Love the singlish lah
He look abit like 周润发
Cues 赌圣 music
Finally someone educating the sheeps
Very informative for those Potential murderers out there..lol
then they cant apply mental illness already coz premeditation
As a Malaysian, I believe that some crimes deserve the death penalty for nothing else can be called justice served.
At the same time i am opposed to it here in Malaysia because the system has many issues where the chances exist for one to be wrongly tried under capital laws snd ending up on death row.
When we talk about the state forfeiting a life of a person, than the bare mininum requirement should be that the proof and evidence produced at a trial showed beyond a shadow of doubt that the accused is guilty.
Interestingly, if one can recall the 80's and 90's, news reports on people convicted and sentenced to death usually carried the words " was sentenced to death after it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that.......".
Sec 300 (d) - No dead body to proof that the person is actually dead, let alone proof that the person was murdered.
Now no dead body to proof that a person is dead and not in hidding or chose to disappear for any rhyme or reason.
Assuming is dead, but again no way to proof cause of death. Could be suicide, could be natural, could be accidental. So assumption on top of an assumption.
And a person can still be convicted and sentenced to death on fundamentally what are assumptions and not solid evidence.
This is an example why the anti death penalty proponents and their rguments cannot be denied.
For there is no difference between an act of murder and the execution of a person guilty of murder otherwise.
malaysia = malai khuai land = stupido third world shitho!e
Bak Zhang so cute n obedient . Bak Kwa ❤️ you .
Murder not = death but drug related = death. Great work.
he is clear and have good articulation. Should consider teaching as profession
The only people more knowledgable than him are the people in facebook’s comments section.
Love your savage but true statement. 👍🏼🤣
The moment the dog's name is revealed, I immediately hungry.
Same bro same
Me 3..... what a cute name for a dog. Lolz
Interesting... U talk in layman language. Hope to see u have your own TH-cam channels with 1 million subscriber ...
Very informational and easy to follow
The dog! I can’t he is js too cute 🥰
Very nice and detailed can be a lecturer 👍🏻
Getting cane by parents when young is already quite pain. Imagine getting cane 24 strokes with the rattan. 😫
Why diminished responsibility action cannot donate wrongly? He really explained so well I think anyone, layman can also understand.
It's amazing how sophisticated humans can be in their violence. "Okay, doctor, is he good to go leh?" "Nah, he has hypertension, you can't cane him" "Ah, oke, we'll take him back to his cell."
Caning can be converted into additional prison time? So can I request for more caning in exchange for a reduced prison time?
Wait, but for section 300 (c), what if it's in self-defense?? I always am confused about how to balance it in this context...
see 6:52, defense 4! it explains self-defense as a possible exception to a murder charge. the balancing factor is whether the self-defense is believed to be disproportionate or not, or at least that’s what i understand from it 😅
You can think of it as a two stage analysis! To be acquitted you must either (1) show that the section 300 charge is not established or (2) show that you have a valid defence (e.g. self defence). It is two stages because having a valid defence doesn't mean you didnt commit the offence. For instance, as long as you intentionally hit the guy in the head, it is generally sufficient to show you have committed a section 300(c) offence. But you can escape conviction by showing that you only did so because you were in danger (self-defence). So technically the self-defence issue only comes in at the second stage. But of course in real life the facts are not as clear and you could argue there was no intention to hit the guy's head in the first place - if so you can escape conviction at the first stage.
I can't get over how his dog is named "Ba Zhang" because i keep translating it into "巴掌" and I keep imagining the man saying "你给我过来，我给你一巴掌" and just hands you a dog-
other than that, great video-
So, how come fatal traffic accidents aren't trialed the same way as these 4 codes?
Whats the Stroke to Time exchange rate?
5:46 😄😄😄
Where was this video when i was in law school?! Why wasnt he my prof?!
这只影片让我认识了流氓律师。浪子回头了。欣赏他的作为尤其是帮助弱势的群体。我会告诉我的‘’老板‘’’有你这么一号人物。愿他保佑你，就像他保佑我一样。加油！
So what the difference between a 3 judges court of appeal and a 5judges court of appeal in Singapore?
The way I thought he was gonna tell the story about how his murder charges got acquitted just based on how he looks… I'm horrible 😬
Glad to see an actual expert talking about Singapore Law, rather than the boomers who think they're lawyers because they read a whatsapp forwarded message once.
freaking cool lawyer 😎
Vincenzo Cassano: Singapore edition.
The term Double Jeopardy? How does it really apply in the court of law lets say a murder case? Eg, He is at first acquitted but later down the track there is a new evidence to charge him. Will he face a new trial? Thank you.
For a sec. I thought you were holding a voodoo doll
Why caning not applied to female ? Equality mah…
Can someone ell me how to get to him? How to contact him, or does he has a law firm??
Thanks. I need advice from him.
Hi just wanted to know, about the murder case at boon keng where a 16year boy killed his 'gf' husband, & at crime watch show his face & name. Correct me if im wrong, where 16 at the point of the murder. Is there any difference in terms of case? Since both os murder, 1 can be disclose & 1 cannot...
Alrite. Now im ready
Funny when he said he looks like criminal more than a lawyer. 🤣
Convicting the accused of murder without the murder weapon AND the recovery of body is a weak case.
Many accused persons were wrongfully executed as a result in several countries.
This is ridiculous. They need to get rid of that 'sudden fight' clause. A group of violent offenders each get less than four years for beating an innocent passerby to death. Life is so cheap in this country.
Another one case for Josephus Tan, the RVHS murder happened recently.
Can he give us a video about using lah vs ah?
22nd December 2020
Regarding the River Valley case?
Culprit is a 16 yr old and is under 18. Won’t get death sentence for sure
Would Josephus consider the Atlanta shootings a hate crime against Asians?
Also, was Huang Na death a straightforward 300A?
he just elaborated serious topic in funny way.. but yeah i understand it all.. and kinda same like malaysian law
These questions... It’s as though you are trying to plan an absolute murder to get away with.
I am cracking up because he named his dog after a food.
I disagree with the matching force argument because not everyone is physically equal. When someone has the ill intention to kill you, they can do that even with bare fist. So why do I have to risk my own safety to take a fair fight while I could end it quickly with an overwhelming method that I carry and safely get home to my family? The person that attempts to assault has already chosen to give up their self defense right. Take an example of how US police officers take down knife wielding suspects with a gun, or would you rather prefer them to wrestle the suspect?
Josephus Tan looks like the District Attorney under investigation in the Ahmaud Arbery's murder case, Jackie Johnson.
Good content on this
i like the name ba Zhang!!!!!
Im curious, is Mr Tan from Invictus law firm? I think I have met him there
Yes, he is one of the lawyer of that firm
so high rise littering is technically section 300d.
PROBATION OFFICERS :don't worry we will keep ur case confidential nobody will know..
THE JUDGE:WELL YOU SEE THIS THIS THIS AND THAT HOW HE GOT CAUGHT AND HIS NAME IS.....
I remember law student Sunny Ang who was convicted of murder of his girlfriend. Her body was never found but he was hanged in 1967.
He was a classmate of my brother and have visited us a few times.
Wahhh...can share more how is he like as a person?
@@Lololol555x I wont be able to tell you how he was as a person but he was soft spoken and looked like a nice guy. This from my memories around 1962/63. Are you in family with him?
@@indian2003 no I actually don't know about this case until you shared so I'm curious how a murderer is as a person before they commit crime.
@@Lololol555x I knew of a guy that hacked his girlfriend to death in Norway but he was a prick. He was so false that only women believed the lies he told.
Ohhh I just saw him during citizenship lessonnn in da slidesss
hi. if i do a black magic curse on someone and the person really died. is this considered as murder? serious question.
Happy to inform you that black magic isn’t a valid murder intention
what's the diff of C and A again?
Okay this is what I understand ah....
300(a) the convicted individual had the intention to let say use rope to strangle the victim to death. (Like yeah shiok ah this person finally die)
As for 300 (c), you freaking hate person A for whatever reasons and you decided to use a knife and stab him/her. At this point, you already have the intention to cause injury to person A. The area you stab is not at vital spots and not very deep and/or multiple times, originally they wouldn't die. But somehow that person cmi and die, then u kena 300 (c) lor.
Disclaimer: Might not be 100% right
Severity i guess
Diff of C and A is B.
The way ba zhang gave up on him 🤣
what if killed someone just for self defense? will the person be charged?
I am wondering, what is the difference between provocation and self defense, isnt provocation due to like someone trying to kill you?
Self defense implies threat as it means to defend against assault. Provocation could be sb threatening the accused / accused's closed ones, but needn't be. It could even just be like "taking ur item without permission" that is also a form of provocation not amounting to assault.
this guy is suitable to be a dad xD
24 canes ....one go ..... that's hell as payback to the victims