M66 vs 627 Tracker - which warrior wins!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 มิ.ย. 2024
- Both revolvers, while being “medium-sized handguns, do fill the hand more than small-frame revolvers. This contributes to better control and accuracy than you can obtain with a small-frame handgun. Both revolvers handle .38 Special, .38 Special +P, and .357 magnum quite well.
Join me in this side-by-side comparison to include specifications, features, range time, and my final thoughts.
________________________________________________________________________
Links to individual reviews:
Taurus Model 66 - What you need to Know! - • Taurus Model 66 - What...
Taurus 627 Tracker - A Full House Review - • Taurus 627 Tracker - A...
________________________________________________________________________
#taurus #taurusrevolver #revolver #personalprotection #selfdefense #revolver
Excellent comparison ! Yes , you can definitely see the difference , the "Tracker" seemed to have less muzzle rise during your side-by-side demonstration while shooting the magnum rounds . However as for accuracy , I couldn't see that one shot better than the other , they both shot well . Actually , you did the shooting so I should've said , you shot well . They're both very elegant revolvers , and I'm sure I'd be satisfied with either one . But I kinda' like the traditional look of the mod. 66 , plus recoil isn't really an issue for me . Anyhow , I think your video was comprehensive & informative . Thank you very much , great job !
I appreciate you taking the time to watch and comment! You are right as far as accuracy; they are pretty much the same. I think that even if I had bench-rested them, any difference in point of impact between the two would still have been on me.
One of these pistols will most likely be my next one purchased therefore a much appreciated and informative video.
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. Both will serve you well. I do like the 627 Tracker over the M66, but will hold onto the M66 just because I do like it.
The 627 Tracker is one sweet piece. Speaking from experience.
I own two Taurus model 65's, one made in the 70's that absolutely mint and a newer production one, I've got a large collection of revolvers Smiths Colts Rugers, my two Taurus 65's have been just as accurate and reliable as any wheel guns I own.
Thanks for watching and commenting. Taurus quality was hit and miss there for awhile; not any different from other manufacturers, I suppose. their quality lately has seem to have improved.
Very informative. Thank you.
Thank you for taking the time to watch and comment. I appreciate both.
Excellent comparison! I agree with these differences...
⚔ Let the battle begin! 😃
Hah! I appreciate your watching and commenting - especially when you agree with me😁.
Awesome board of information! I was just about to order a 66, but you changed my mind.
Thanks you for watching and taking the time to comment. I think that you would like either, but I do favor the 627 Tracker over the 66 for comfort and ease of handling .357 magnum cartridges. I hope that you enjoy yours. I assuming the 627 Tracker?
Excellent video to compare 2 really nice and good looking guns.
Thank you for taking the time to watch and comment. It seems that quality is returning to the Taurus line and these two are fine examples. I do favor the 627 Tracker for the milder felt recoil over the 66. Also, the grip of the 627 Tracker is a better fit in my hand over the 66. I don't plan on ridding myself of either.
Excellent comparison and I agree with you the 627 has a slight advantage! I own both pistols but my tracker is the 6.5 inch version. Great job on the video, best wishes from Portland, Oregon. Thank you!
Thank you. I appreciate you watching and taking the time to comment.
I love this video, thank you! I've been thinking of getting the 627 for some time now, and your analysis here begged the question: What am I waiting for? I look forward to more of your videos, as I really appreciate your thoroughness, practicality, and pacing. The 'Tacticool' need not apply. Cheers!
Thank you for taking the time to watch and comment. I am glad that you found the video useful, and you will like the 627 Tracker. No sir! No "Tactifoolishness" on this channel.
@@RangeRoninChronicles 😂 And that's as it should be!
I have always wanted the Taurus model 66 but I already have the 2 pre lock S&W model 66.
I like the hair cut btw.
Lol on the hair cut! Thanks for watching and commenting. Stay tuned to the channel, as I will have a review of a pre-lock S&W Model 66-2 coming soon (January 2024).
Good video.
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment.
Have The 627, Hate Cleaning The Ports
Thanks for watching and commenting. Pipe Cleaners and carbon remover do a pretty good job. For me, most cleaning time is spent removing the carbon on the face of the cylinder and around the forcing cone. That takes some serious scrubbing.
That was a very good comparison lot of information I compared those two guns myself last year I chose the 66 over the tracker because the grips felt better in my hands trigger was identical on the two that I had in front of me they're both good guns They look nice but I do prefer the classic look of the 66 over the tracker but I do agree with everything in your video It will be less full recoil you can see it there's no doubt muzzle brake always works
Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment. What's great about what we have available to us is that there is something for everyone.
I have owned both and I like both recoil was different I carry a 66 6.5" and I like the grip of the tracker better but they both shoot accurate.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I prefer the grip of the "Tracker" also.
I got the M44 over the 44 tracker because of the grips and the extra weight. My m44 also has a ported barrel, think they discontinued it the next year. I like it and will take it in the woods.
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. One of these days I just might get the chance to compare one to my Ruger Redhawk. It looks like the Tracker 44 only comes with a 4-inch barrel, which would be good to compare with the Redhawk with its 4.2-inch barrel.
@@mancavestudios-n6e I agree that would be a good comparison. My m44 is a 3 in barrel. I have a Rossi 971 4in which would go great in this video
I own both. The 66 in a 6" and the 627 Tracker in 4". I love 'em both! However, the 627 I shoot more accurate than anything I own. Which is saying a lot! Try putting an XS standard dot tritium (for J Frame) on the 627. Just sand the sides of the sight slightly. Works like a dream! 😎
P.S. I always enjoy how thorough your content is! Keep it up! 👍
I just might try that sight. Thanks for the info, watching, and commenting. I soak them all up.
Unbelievable that Taurus still uses the ports on the 627 🤣🤣🤣
Even though Taurus listed them both with Medium frames
When compared to S&Ws
They are closer to the L frame than K frame
I have owned both
The 627 is basically a 3 inch barrel with a built in compensator
The rifling only runs 3 inches of the barrel
I wish … the 627 had a un ported 3 inch barrel.. they honestly couldn’t make them fast enough.. a true Medium Framed 7 shot 357 with a 3 inch barrel
I don’t understand why they can’t see the potential…
Practical and interesting side-by-side comparison of two very similar Taurus revolvers. The 627 seems to benefit from the barrel porting, without any (apparent in day-like lighting) added muzzle flash. I've enjoyed my bobbed-hammer 856 Executive Grade model for the last 6 months, with no issues.
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. Sorry it took so long to respond, but I did not receive a notification for you comment. I also have the 856 Executive. I hope that you had a chance to view the review on that one (Taurus 856 Executive Grade - Detailed Review - th-cam.com/video/GCKwHjd_cME/w-d-xo.html).
What about a 3”barrel On the tracker? Have you done a review of that as compared to the 4” barrel? As 3” may be more amenable to concealed carry perhaps? You take of that comparison would be appreciated …. Thnx
Thanks for watching and for your question. I would do a comparison, but a 3-inch Tracker does not exist. You might be thinking of the 692, which is a .38 Special/.357 magnum/9mm. I have no immediate plan to review the 692.
The 627 has in reality has a 3 inch barrel…
The barrel is only rifled 3 inches the area of the ports is not rifled
It is with older models, but new ones doesn’t
The competition guys figured out that the hotter the ammo the better with ported barrels
Yessir! they do like their ported barrels. Thanks for watching and commenting.
I almost didn't recognize you with the new and improved barbering!
Lol! That's my other brother and evil twin!
Excellent and extremely thorough review of these two excellent revolvers. It's sad that Taurus gets such a bad rap. I think it's mainly due to some of their past QC issues on their old semi-autos. I have a Taurus G2C semi-auto along with a Taurus 605 Polymer Defender .357 and the Taurus 627 .357 (6.5" barrel). No reliability issues with any of them. The only negative I have is on my 605 polymer defender which sadly, is not a very accurate revolver. However like how it looks and how comfortable it is to shoot (and how compact it is), that I may invest in having a gun smith take a look at it to see if the accuracy issue is caused by a slight timing or luckup issue.
But my 627 Tracker shoots like an absolute dream. It is one of my favorite handguns to shoot and is what got me into reloading. The only sad thing is that it doesn't look like Taurus still makes the scope mounts that were originally made for this particular revolver. That was disappointing but not a big deal as I still shoot very well with the iron sights. The ported muzzle is a big reason why I went with the 627 Tracker and I'm quite happy that I did as it's nice how fast I can get back on target using hot 158 grain .357 magnum rounds. I also love how smooth the double action trigger is on it. Overall just a quality and easy to shoot wheel gun that sadly does not get nearly as much attention as it should.
So thanks again to bringing attention to these great Taurus revolvers.
Thank you for taking the effort to watch and comment. Both help me and the channel grow. You are correct in that Taurus went through a bad period. From what I understand, it was because Taurus was re-tooling and replacing out-dated equipment. It appears that their quality is getting better, which makes them more competitive, but it will take a while to regain the trust of those unwilling to take a chance on Taurus products.
I have reviewed quite a few Taurus revolvers of late and all seem to be quality builds. The Taurus TX22 that I reviewed is an excellent .22 LR pistol.
I would like to try a Taurus TH in .40 Smith and Wesson to see how one compares to the other comparable-sized .40 S&W pistols that I have (Springfield Armory XDm and Glock). That's not a commitment, just something I would like to try...a definite maybe?
@@RangeRoninChronicles I definitely plan on getting a TX-22 (the compact model which comes optics ready). Everyone I've known that has one raves about it. The TH series I agree look very intriguing. I've been eyeballing the Taurus TH-9 and almost bought one awhile back but ended up getting a CZ P-07. From what I understand however (and this could be a myth), the TH series are supposed to be based upon the CZ-75 design. I love SA/DA guns so I still may pick up a TH-9 at some point. If Taurus is smart, they'll make an upgraded TORO version of their TH-9 and TH-40 with the slide cut out for optics. That's because there are VERY few modern SA/DA pistols out there today that are cut for optics. Those that are, tend to be very expensive competition models.
Another thing that is very excited is that on their website they have a TH10 10mm model that they're making apparently. I haven't seen it yet in gun stores, but I'm sure it will sell quite well now that 10mm is seeing a resurgence on the market.
@@wigon Ayup! A DA/SA 10mm is intriguing. As long as the barrels have good case support, the frames are beefed, and the recoil system is up to handle the mighty 10 pressure, it just might be a good firearm. I have a 10 from Springfield Armory and Glock plus a couple of 1911s. At the TH 10 price point, they could give the 10mm market a run for their money - if the quality is in place. We'll see what the future holds.
It's been a great conversation so far. But its Christmas Eve. A Merry Christmas to you and yours!
I'm leaning towards the 66 in black with 6 inch barrel.
Thanks for watching and commenting. If the Model 66 6-inch fills you needs and wants, you should go for it.
I have a Tracker in .45 acp. It is definitely a boomer.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I can imagine that it is.
I’m seriously thinking about getting the model 627.
Thanks for watching and for your comment. I believe that you would like the 627 Tracker.
I have the Rossi m64/I prefer it over the Taurus.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I give Rossi their due. Their products seem to be better than before.
Thank goodness that the Tracker now comes with a modern grip and not that goofy looking ribbed one. 😁
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. Like you, I could not bring myself to like that ribbed grip that Taurus used.
I've owned a tracker .44 mag for over 10 years. I hated those ribbed grips, as the revolver had a bad habit under recoil of pushing back against my finger by the trigger guard and bruising it. Last year, I finally bought Pachmayr grips and that solved the problem. ZERO problems with the gun and it is very accurate.
@@ralphgreenjr.2466 That early "ribbed" grip kept me from buying one of these (or any Taurus with them). When they went to the new style grip, I said okay let's try this.
Showing two different grips on the 627,,did I miss something ,,I think it comes with the non finger stock
The 627 Tracker comes with one set of grips, finger groove; at least the one that I have did.
For some reason pictures of the 627 still have the old style grip.
@@OOICU812 That was a stock photo. My guess is that Taurus did not update the website. The new grips are much better.
Cost comparison? I have the 66 and the ergonomics feel better in my hand compared to the "carry" handles Taurus is going to on many revolvers. I'm not going to carry a 2 1/2 # gun and the 66 just feels better in my hand. Recoil is tolerable.
Thanks for watching and commenting. As for your question, I can only quote MSRP; The Model 66 (the one reviewed) goes for $621.99 MSRP, the 627 Tracker (the one reviewed) has an MSRP of $590.99. Both are according to the Taurus website. Of course, they can be found for less.
If the Model 66 had a more rounded back of the grip, I would have liked it better, as I prefer a more rounded and wider grip. I liked the 627 Tracker over the Model 66 simply because the way the grip felt in the hand, and having a milder recoil with .357 magnum was a plus in my book. Both were as accurate as I could make them, which means that my lack of shooting ability should not reflect on the firearms.
👍👍🇺🇸
Thanks, once again. And, have a very Merry Christmas!
I have a tracker,best gun I ever fired!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. With regard to these two revolvers, I prefer the "tracker".
Colt says it ALL!
Crap, I was hoping and thinking 🤔 these two gun were seven shot revolvers??
Thanks for watching and commenting. They are both seven-shot revolvers
Sorry for a second posting but I have a question after all. Do you happen to recall what ammo you carried in the 82 on your security job?
No problem. I carried 158-grain LSWCHP. These were standard pressure loads, not +P. I cannot remember the brand, though...too many years ago.
@@RangeRoninChronicles Thanks for the reply. I ask because a few years ago I had a friendly conversation with an armed security guard from whatever company the grocery store chain had contracted with that year, and he had a Taurus 82 on. Turns out it was issue from the company and all their personnel had to use them. By this time, the state of Florida had already allowed for the use of 9mm. semi auto pistols for security guards. Then when I asked him what he was carrying in that 82 for ammo, imagine my surprise when he pulled out a speed loader of 6 130 grain FMJ round nose loads. He then proceeded to inform me that those were all any of the armed guards in his company were allowed to use in those 82's.
Thank you for replying. While the security company that I worked for did not mandate the type of ammunition we could use (RN, HP, JHP, etc.), it was mandated by the state (at that time) that only .38 Special ammunition could be shot. Now, that's not saying that we could not carry a .357 magnum revolver, only that we could only shoot .38 Special (a little semantic wordplay?). No consideration was provided for +P ammunition, but since the Model 82 was not rated for +P, I had to carry and qualify with standard pressure loads.
By the way, Merry Christmas to you and yours!