Are 145mm Cranks The Future? | Testing Crank Lengths With Neko Mulally
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2024
- In the bike industry, bar width has always been seen as a major player in how your bike feels and handles. But why have so many mountain bikers been ignoring crank arm length for all these years? Rich Payne and Anna Cipullo set out to find if crank length makes a difference to their riding with help from @NekoMulally, @SethsBikeHacks, @BIKINGWITHBOBO, @shellpageau and @5DEV.
In association with 5Dev Components: gmbn.tech/5Dev
⏱️ Timestamps ⏱️
00:00 - Intro
01:11 - The Crotch-O-Meter
03:59 - Testing on 170mm cranks
05:50 - Testing on shorter cranks
07:26 - Summary
09:12 - Neko Mulally's Bike
10:32 - Testing even shorter cranks
13:33 - Summary
Useful Links:
Watch The UCI MTB World Series Elite Racing On GCN+ 👉 gmbn.eu/mtb23
NEW GMBN XC Kit! 👉 gmbn.eu/XCKit
Submit your Photo and Video to us 👉 upload.gmbn.com/tech
Racing Highlights & More On GMBN Racing 👉 gmbn.eu/GMBNracing
Watch #shorts on GMBN 👉 gmbn.eu/GMBNshorts
Sign-up to our newsletter 👉 gmbn.eu/newsletter
Is shorter even crank length something the bike industry should consider when speccing out different sizes on their bikes? Let us know what you think! 👇
Watch more on GMBN Tech...
📹 This Prototype DH Bike Has An Automatic Gearbox! 👉 • This Prototype DH Bike...
📹 Watch our Editor’s Choice Playlist 👉 gmbn.tech/editorschoice
📹 Watch our weekly show 👉 gmbn.tech/GMBNTechShow
🎵 Music - licensed by Epidemic Sound 🎵
RNA (Heyson Remix) (Instrumental Version) - Katori Walker
Building Character - Sarah, the Illstrumentalist
Endless Longing - Brendon Moeller
High Energy Bad Attitude - Bonkers Beat Club
luv - bomull
Other Spaces - DJ Eely
Pretty Carolina (Instrumental Version) - Jontha Links
Show Me How Good It Can Get - Sarah, the Illstrumentalist
Smoky Smokey - John Runefelt
#gmbntech #gmbn #mtb #mountainbiking
The Global Mountain Bike Network (GMBN) is the world’s largest and fastest-growing online mountain bike channel and community - and your destination for the best mountain bike content in the world.
GMBN is dedicated to inspiring and unlocking your riding potential. Our videos cater to fans of every mountain bike discipline: from mile-munching cross-country (XC) riders, through adrenaline-fuelled dirt jumpers, gravity-hungry downhillers or aspiring enduro racers, and beyond.
Every day of every month, our ex-pro presenting team are on hand to entertain and inspire you while also providing a uniquely qualified insight into the world of mountain biking. Every week we deliver original daily videos that include:
Adventurous and entertaining features
Mountain bike skills coaching
Technical advice and guidance
Mechanical know-how to keep you rolling
A place for the riding community with our weekly Dirt Shed Show
Thanks to our sponsors:
Canyon Bikes: gmbn.eu/Canyon
Nukeproof Bikes: gmbn.eu/nukeproof
Orbea Bikes: gmbn.eu/Orbea
Park Tool: gmbn.eu/ParkTool
Smith Helmets & Eyewear: gmbn.eu/Smith
Crankbrothers Pedals: gmbn.eu/crankbros
Shimano Footwear: gmbn.eu/ShimanoShoes
Ergon: gmbn.eu/ergon
Vittoria Tires: gmbn.eu/Vittoria
FSA: gmbn.eu/fsa
Spank: gmbn.eu/Spank
Topeak: gmbn.eu/topeak
Garmin: gmbn.eu/Garmin
Peaty's Products: gmbn.eu/Peatys
Wahoo: gmbn.eu/WahooTraining
Worx Power Tools: gmbn.eu/Worx
CamelBak: gmbn.eu/CamelBak
Watch our sister channels:
Global Mountain Bike Network - / gmbn
GMBN Racing - gmbn.eu/GMBNracing
Electric Mountain Bike Network - / embn
Global Cycling Network - / gcn
GCN Tech - / gcntech
GCN Racing - / gcnracing
Global Triathlon Network - / gtn
GCN Italia - / gcnitalia
GCN en Espanol - / gcnenespanol
GCN auf Deutsch - / gcnaufdeutsch
GCN en Francais - / gcnenfrancais
GCN Japan - / gcnjapan
GCN Training - / gcntraining - กีฬา
![ไม่ต้องมีที่ที่ให้ฉันอยู่ แต่ขอแค่มีฉันอยู่ก็พอ (Spaceless) - getsunova [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4N8idbxZ-7M/mqdefault.jpg)
A wild Seth appearance is always appreciated
Yes! Nice to see. For short cranks (under $200.00) Trailcraft Cycles has has 140mm, 152mm, 165mm cranks being run my pro downhill riders.
@@brettrosenbauer3299 Or pick up a Giant Veer 20 for $50 on marketplace and rob the cranks. They're steel so even though they're made for kids I trust them.
I'm hella surprised they didn't mention him in the video title.
Wonderful video. This just goes to further reinforce why sizing bikes by height is an oversimplified way to look at it.
Bike companies really need to wake up to real world sizing for the humans that they sell to. The SML sizing model is dead.
I was going to put in a shout out to hardtail party for bringing this up and for doing an awesome video that I hope everyone watches also! Such great content we have in the modern Era of mtb and TH-cam!
Everyone should check out your video on the topic. You've been big on this for a long time.
Your video was great. 175 was not good for my body i now have 165mm cranks . So thanks Steve .
Hardtail party did a really good crank length testing/ discussion some time ago. Worth checking it out.
I'm 5' 4" and my women's-specific Trek trail bike came with 175mm cranks, which should be a crime! I just switched to 155mm a couple months ago. Bought mine from Appleman Bikes in Minnesota. Matt Appleman has good data on his site showing that tibia length tends to give a more accurate estimate than inseam
Thank you for letting me know about Appleman's cranks. I definately would've considered those if i was aware of their existance when i was shopping around. Ended up fitting 152mm's from Trailcraft. Best upgrade i've ever done. Like day and night. Super difference in the way the bike performs on tricky passages on the trail
Question: Do you know if the appleman spindle is made of steel or aluminium?
Just went to check my length to Appleman Bikes and it said 197.8! 😁
Now I understand why I'm so comfy with 190's 😎
But only in my BMX bike. On my MTB I just run whatever strong 175's I can find
I'm really surprised this isn't quite a big thing in cycling. Seat height is ok for inside leg adjustment, but the lower limb length turning circle is obvious. Shorter lower leg, shorter crank.
I’m just over 6’ tall, and I’ve ridden 175 to 155 and there is a huge difference…I’ve landed on 160mm (5 DEV) 🎉
I´m 6.3´ and I ride 175mm cranks... I was thinking to get some smaller ones for better clearance
What is your inseam measurement?
I'm 6’ tall and went whit 155. Just went with Pinned instead of those hyped up expensive cranks
Best video by far for proving crank length matter! I love the guests! It makes it more real! Seth & Bobo woohoo!!!! Great job GMBN!
Another thing no one considers is Q factor. At 6'2" I'd love to run a wider Q than is available.
@@c0nsci0usnessI'm also 6'2", but I'd like a narrower quack- factor myself. Things get in the way quickly, though.
This doesn't prove anything its two people in a commercial for 5dev that have a money incentive to say thing that are positive for a company that sell cranks of different lengths.
It is possible that everybody should have shorter cranks but this is no proof of anything. It was the same with all the youtubers raving about oval charings making you more efficient because they could feel the pedaling was smoother. Not to say that their isn't any upsides i just don't know if there are any except for larger groundclearance for shorter cranks.
Wait, ¿Bobo isn't just someone who works at GMBN?
@@brauljo Bobo has his own yt channel
Make sure you raise your saddle height accordingly when going from 175s to 155s which will raise your center of gravity and might require a cockpit adjustment as well...
i was getting excited about changing crank size but then this thought occurred to me. since my frame size is constant, i’ll have to raise the saddle and possibly get my bars higher, too. those would be huge changes all at once. could be tough to adapt.
Why would you raise your saddle with shorter cranks?
@@msm624 Because the crank is shorter?? If you are a rider who knows your seat height number and are sensitive to any changes then you know. If you're a rider who raises and lowers their ridged seat post and never gives saddle height a second thought as it's close enough, then you will be fine.
@@msm624 to get full leg extension when you pedal. If I lover my dropper post, even an inch, I know longer et the full leg extension when pedaling. About 25mm=1 inch., so if you go from 170 to 165, not much change, but I'd still notice it. if you went to 145, that is a huge change. It is still peronal preference, but riders who are at full leg extension now, are very likely to need to adjust. If you don't care about pedaling--note the emphasis on E-Bikes driving this in the video--then may not matter to you.
@@CJinsoo shorter cranks effectively raise the saddle, you'd need to lower it
I'm glad you made this video, and no snark is intended. I'd love for more people to know about shorter cranks. It takes about 30-40 hours to learn how to pedal a new size of crank. I had been taught how to pedal properly 25 years ago but could never do it on standard cranks. I'm 6'2". I just thought I was too uncoordinated. (Proper = pedaling in a circle, or as I was taught "pedal front to back"). I put on a set of 153s in 2020, was instantly faster, and remembered proper technique a couple weeks after putting them on. Here is what I want everyone to know: You do not size cranks by proportion of leg length. You size it by resulting powerband. When a crank is short enough, you can safely (for your knees) get max power down to about 30 rpm, where below 70 rpm on 165s it was dangerous for me. I am 3 or 4 gears faster on all sizes shorter than 153 down to 130 compared to 165. I can accelerate a hard gear from about 45rpm on 153's, and on 130's from about 55rpm. I can mash the gears all day and not cramp, no pain. I can also rev to the moon on 130's, and go well over 100 rpm on the 153s. I have about 1500 hours on 153, 140, 130, 137 and ended up on 145. The dirt bike analogy works somewhat: 153 = an open class 450 dirt bike. 140 is like a 250 dirt bike. Better in some ways than the 153. 137 and 130 felt similar, like a 125 2-stroke. Fast, but all top-end rpms. 145 was a nice blend for me. My 5'1" wife is on 120s, but she is unable to provide feedback due to arthritis and low body awareness. She seems to be doing ok. I may put the 130's back on for her.
HOLY SMOKES!!! BOBO and SETH!!! Rock on GMBN, thanks for bringing the pros out! 😄
Super glad we're finally having this conversation! Can't wait til 155mm are widely available and not just custom machined billet options!
Hi Guys, what I didn't hear much about in the video is the leverage aspects of the cranks. Going longer gives you more leverage on the climbs, but shorter usually gives you more use of your gear ratios. An extra 10mm crank length can equal +/-2 or three teeth on the cassette.
Let's ask the BMX guys what's better for putting power down
Technically it’s more leverage, but putting power down is about more than just leverage, it comes down to body angles and other individual factors.
Harder to climb with shorter cranks until you change to a smaller front sprocket.
I agree entirely. I've just made the jump from 26 to 29'er, 3x9 to 1x12 and 175 to 170 cranks. The maths showed hill climbing should be harder on the 29'er, but I haven't felt it. Body lever sizes matched to bike crank length is far more important than the tiny loss in pedal lever length as you can extract more power from your legs with the proper fit. @@bigredactionsportsstuff1245
Like with all things and mountain biking it's a trade-off. In my opinion the little amount of added difficulty on ttclimbs that come with shorter cranks is really only noticeable immediately after you switch and about 10 rides in you won't even notice it, however you will notice every time you ride your bike for the rest of your life how much pedal strikes have gone down and frequency and how that old notion of dropping the outside foot on every turn becomes more and more dated and unnecessary
the smaller the crank the less stress on your knees and hips,win win.
6’2” and run 155 on all my bikes now. Absolutely love it.
Oh wow! What is it you like about it?
I’m 5’3” with short-ish legs and have been struggling with long cranks all my life. The smallest crank I’ve found available at my local bike shops are 165mm. I would love to try 145mm cranks on my mtb for some downhill, maybe even bike packing, and my gravel bike since a hip injury has been causing me pain at the top of my pedal stroke.
I just had my kiddo test out some Prevelo Heir 145mm carbon cranks. He is 10 and right near 5 feet tall. That bike previously had 155mm cranks on it.
Only recently (the last decade or less)have kids bikes seen just a few brands paying attention to the needs of our shortest ride buddies.
Very interesting piece. Well done GMBN Tech.
Shirley "the correct length" cranks for each individual should be the future!
Agreed, but did anyone else hear Leslie Nielson in their head after reading this comment?
@@KevinT3141 What you're supposed to say is, "Yes it is, and don't call me Shirley!" 😉
Great way to sell more parts.
@@wordreet That surely would have been the thing to say.
@@KevinT3141 Shirley you are surely right!
I just purchased a new Rocky Mountain Element in XS for my 9 year old daughter who is 4’8” tall. It came with 175mm cranks. Crazy. Went with 140 and it’s night and day difference. She had trouble riding it stock.
Take away is Anna is a smoother rider, nice flow in control.
I went for about 150 in length, excellent, I couldn't be happier, this changed my bike, I recommend doing this update
May I know you height?
Bobo's section with the crotch o meter made me spit coffee out of my nose. !
Switching to a shorter crank will lower the power you can generate at the wheel, all else being equal. If you shorten the crank, you would need to switch to a smaller chainring to get back to a similar power, which will in turn have an impact on the top end speed in smaller gears. The drivetrain is a system, and changes to one part sometimes require compensating changes to other parts. It would be a great follow-up video to talk about the relationship between crank length and chainring size (and cassette, and even back wheel size for folks who switch to mullet)
On a full suspension bike carrying a heavy rider with 175/170 cranks are too long. It doesn't matter if the margins of torque are a fraction higher if someone has to to pump up the rear to an uncomfortable ride just to keep from pedal striking.
All a shorter crank will do is make you a stronger rider at the end of the day.
On downhill and enduro riding it's the same thing, pedal strikes but your not pedaling. Shorter cranks are necessary for a lot of riders.
Thank you for that, I dropped down to my original 32t, I felt a difference.
when I switched from the normal 165 to 150 cranks I started riding everything one gear lower- but I didn't really notice that, because you can only notice the difference on the lowest and highest gear- both of which I almost never use on my 12s cassette.
@@justsayin3600 I'm a heavy rider on a FS bike with 180 cranks and I do just fine. Depends on the bike setup and the proportional sizes of the rider. I'm 6'7" tall and have a custom shock for my weight so travel is not compromised.
@@garrywhelan9211 can you share some info about that shock? More heavy ppl would love to find a key to not strike pedals onto ground so often
Those are like pieces of art! Beautiful design.
It's about time! I've been asking GMBN to do an in depth review on crank lengths for years. Every time I got the generic answer, "The longer the crank the more torque. Shorter cranks less torque". Never addressing fitment, inseam length and spin.
Yes one gets tired of that generic bullshit answer from everybody. Even this video doesn't cover everything it's better than nothing. It's good that people is waking up. Lets hope they influence SRAM to release their cheap OEM-only 155mm NX cranks for sale to everybody!
I've always thought it was ridiculous that all bikes came spec"d with 175mm cranks, no matter the size of the bike. I mean, bike manufacturers played around with different wheel sizes for different sized bikes but still spec'd 175mm cranks on a small.
You need a Hardtail Party Steve cameo.
I tend to put 165 on all my bikes because it's the smallest available. However it would be interesting to see this in practice on something like a XC circuit, and measuring power etc.
So glad you're talking about this. We go to fitters and they measure everything about us, but don't usually measure out the crank length. Ultimately, it's all about power generation, isn't it? Too long and it might steal away power, too short, it might steal away power. It would, totally, make sense that everyone's got a sweet spot where the angles and lengths measure up for the best power for each person. Thanks, all.
Good stuff, keep it coming GMBN!
I can’t believe frame manufacturers are still spec’ing 170mm cranks on XS and S frames. I have had to pay for 165mm cranks on all my bikes at 5’6”. Now I’m thinking that even 165’s may be too long.
One of the best GMBN segments I've seen in a while!
Never thought I’d see Bobo on GMBN, awesome!
I took my first ride on my new bike just today with Canfield Cranks. They also recommend shorter cranks as well, with a formula based on your inseam
They recommended 155mm cranks. I went with 160mm, and wow! What a difference! Love it!
What is the formula ?
20% to 20.5% of inseam
It's always fun to listen to Anna ride.
Im 5'6" and recently gone to 165mm cranks and an oval chainring. And those two things combined have been a night and day improvement for me
Inseam measurement?
@LemonySnicket-EUC its around 31-32"
@@Dlawler I'm 6 ft with the same inseam. The inseam measurement is paramount.
@LemonySnicket-EUC it's funny how all that works. I allway question my own memory when someone points it out
All I know is I’m 6’-3” with a 34” inseam and have ridden 175 or longer cranks my whole life until I bought a Transition that came with 165 on it. They felt so natural and good, my hips and legs were less sore after a ride, less pedal strikes, more stability and able to rev the bike up faster etc.. Now all my bikes have 165 on them and I will never go back to longer.
is 165mm not the most common size? I am pretty sure that every bike I ever had came with 165 cranks? maybe there are regional differences??
175mm was very common for medium to large frames in the US. I'm a bit taller, but every bike I've owned (road, gravel/cross, MTB), 1980s-2010s came with 175mm stock. @@olik136
@@olik136I think the most common sizes are 165 to 175. Thanks bike industry...
@@olik136usually come 170mm
@@olik136 most bikes in size xl used to come with 175 until this modern era, at least in the US anyway. (Transition) was the first
I'm excited to make this adjustment now. Sounds like a you don't know what you are missing until you do situation. Thanks for the video.
We need a chart for those of us with no crotch-o-meter 🤔🤷♂️
There's crotch-o-meters appearing in lots of shops now!
Applemanbicyles has a converter on their site and offer multi position rental cranks
Found a few online calculators by searching for “crank length calculator” (rocket science mode engaged :) )
@@andynelson1977 Yes, but it is obviously a calculation based on inseam. What is the formula!
Thanks for another great presentation Anna & Rich! I have 170's and it is a eBike so I will consider shorter lengths now!
It’s time for one of the big crank manufacturers to do a bigger study on this. If you take 100 people with a 32” inseam and have them all try 155,160,165 and 170’s and 90% prefer 160’s, then maybe bike company’s will start selling medium sized bikes with 160mm cranks. Do this for for all sizes. I’d be very interested to know if this is just a preference thing or if everyone my height would prefer shorter cranks.
Reducing crank length for the advantage of fewer pedal strikes seems short sighted. We made bigger wheels to roll over obstacles better. We widened hub and BB sizes to accomodate the increased side leverage created by a taller wheel( more weight). We made bigger frames stronger (2x) to handle the wheel increase(heavier). We added more and bigger gears to handle the leverage increase(heavier). We added a larger rear derailer to handle the gear range increase(heavier). So....we reduce crank size so as to decrease our leverage on our bigger heavier bike...
Great video, new thing on my wishlist, cheers
MTB kinematics have plateaued in the last few years, so seeing some attention paid to ergonomics is actually brilliant.
And long overdue...
What a collab🎉
My Scott Ransom came with 175 .I switched to a 165 gx wow the difference is amazing with 170mm of travel front and rear .I can now peddle in corners and out of corners .
You are the first review is the first I’ve seen that talks about the “bike stance” stability difference and personal preference. While others try to just align crank arm lengths with inseam and rider height. Thank you for sharing this helpful information. I have 170mm and I’m short 5’7” and planning my new enduro bike custom build
Great video! Loved seeing BoBo and Seth on the video as well.
Been running 150s on the ebike and 155 on regular mtb bike for 5 years
I dropped to 160s and at my old age, it was a very noticeable climbing Quana Hill in Weatherford, TX. It seemed a bit easier, and I felt faster going up. Thanks, guys!
What about going down ? It force less agressive attempt.
what a nonsense - shorter cranks the more force you have to put on them
Great video as always from GMBN Tech.
Thanks folks. This intrigues me greatly. At 6ft1 the 175s have just been the norm. Yet, watching this, trying different sizes should have been a common thing will before now!
Definitely got my attention on possibly changing crank lengths
5Dev
Anna's Stunt Double - first 2 minutes are awesome !!
I'm a 5' 7" guy and had 165, 170 and 175 mm cranks. 165 was the best for me as I felt the rotation of my legs was more natural and comfortable. The other two cranks made me feel like stomping compared to the 165.
Try 145mm, that's the maximum crank arm length for your height.
a very original take and perhaps a much needed video. Both my road bike and MTB (not 100% sure but it seems likely) have 170mm cranks but I heard that shorter cranks apply more force to the drivetrain. GMBN staff are the most fun
Great video. The crock-o-meter is the best! I’m a short rodeo a small bike with 165 cranks and I always get pedal strikes even on easy stuff. def need shorter cranks. ❤
Thank you. Finally! I'd like to add one realworld tested fact to all the other advantages mentioned: If you are a "heavy rider" (somebody the bike/suspension-industry do not care about) THIS is your simple solution without having to add 340PSI to the damper. Changing to 152mm has been a revolution for me. LIke night and day on the MTB-trails we have (not like the "clean" one in the video, but more like is shown a 12.25 minutes in: Natural trails in the forest with the addition of lots of heavy roots). Confidence level up 100%. Bike drives like a tractor up on them slippery rocks and down again. No pedal strikes. P.s: forget the expensive ones from 5DEV. There are many other out there if you search. Hope EVO for example, or Trailcraft!
Bobo, Seth?!? This is like the Avengers of MTB.
Shorter cranks seem like the best way to go. 5Dev is knocking it out of the park with some amazing products. I’ve always ran 170mm cranks & at 5’8” with shorter legs shorter cranks seems like the answer to help with avoiding pedal strikes & helping with climbing & cornering. Leaning towards giving 155 or 160’s a try to see how I like them over the 170’s.
Try 155mm HOPE EVO's ;)
I dropped my cranks fron the stock 165 to 150 on my eBike, more for pedal strikes but i noticed the difference in riding almost immediately would never go back to longer cranks.
I've wanted shorter cranks on my bikes for decades. Bike shops and others have somewhat discouraged me from going shorter. Recently, I wanted power numbers on my mountain bike, so I upgraded to a new crank. I went 5mm shorter and thought 10mm might have been better. I played around with some numbers on paper and confirmed after the first ride, going shorter has more positives than negative. ✌
so after riding with 170mm cranks for the last 20yrs….purchased my first ebike (with 165mm cranks) in February and with multiple rock strikes i dived into shorter cranks for it….went straight to some 150mm Mirandas and love the freedom of being able to pedal through all terrain without fear…just wish Shimano/SRAM would catch up, it’s not a trend big $’s….
6:24:
Length for climbing (XC) 172.5 and for DH, 155.
Quite a bit of variability, so be aware of your application.
I'm over 70 and our Utah climbs are 3000 ft of climbing followed by 3000 ft of descending. I found that (at my age) going down in size resulted in Achilles tendon soreness until I got used to the greater torque required with the shorter crank arm length. I also have a slow cadence, so that could contribute. No real change in pedal strikes out here. Apparently, if crank arm height is "x", our rock heights are all "x+5"mm!
70 and riding! you sir ,are an inspiration !
Thank you from Truckee California
I’ve been running 155mm Cranks on my eMTB and love them. I want to put the same on my enduro bike as I have short legs and a long torso and love how the shorter cranks feel
For a shortarse like me combined with the low BB of modern bikes it seems like a no brainer.
Having a Turner DHR means having an incredibly low bottom bracket. I'm currently riding on 165s and to say that rock strikes are an issue would be an understatement. The amount of pedaling I have to do isn't a lot because I ride strictly lift and shuttle serviced runs, so the decreased leverage ratio would actually be welcome. Plus having my feet closer together on the platform and closer to the bottom bracket would really help with the center of gravity. My bike also weighs close to 40 pounds so having some weight savings from the skeletonized design would be absolutely incredible!
Been running Canfield 155mm for a while now and love it.
I agree with him, I feel better and more stable on longer cranks and here's what nobody mentions when switching from longer to shorter cranks. Now you gotta raise your saddle up, Handlebar should follow to make up for the distance. You will also sit higher on the bike instead of in the bike.
That is only while sitting though. With your pedals flat it's exactly the same.
Great vid.. I’ll be trying 165’s asap
I'm 5'9" 175mm with an inseam of 31" 79mm and I changed to 165mm cranks 2 years ago from 175mm and my overall comfort and control is better along with fewer pedal strikes.
Thanks for including the measurements including both ft./in., and cm/mm, with your preference & experience. It is appreciated.
I want this crank because i need short crank to have correct alignment of the kneecap and pedal axle. I would also greatly reduce the risk of hitting the ground
I forgpt to add yet another advantage in my comment yesterday: It's way easier to do wheelies now!
I'm 5 7" and I went from 170 to 152. Fat tire E-Bike SE f@r 4 8"X 26.0". I love the shorter crank arms. Great going over larger roots & rocks.
I remember hearing about the shorter cranks when Ben Cathro talked about it on one of his pinkbike series video. I tried out 155 from then on and never looked back. I feel more center and balance on the bike specially on the descent and much more easier climbing.
Yeah, it's really like day and night when climbing difficult passages. So good!!
Improving selection of most appropriate crank lengths is decades overdue!
At long last.
I run the 165’s from 5DEV on my enduro and love them. I’ve been considering trying the 155’s next. I like being able to pedal through the rocks in races and being less likely to peddle strike. Durable ass all hell too. Made it through entire Northstar DH series and CES enduro series on them without one issue. 🤘
Pedal!
anna cipullo , I resonate with your experience with the 145mm.
I always ride XL bikes (6’2” with short torso and long legs) so always had 175mm. My new Stumpjumper (S5) came with 170 and I love it. I don’t notice any difference other than less pedal strikes on tech climbs. Don’t think I could go much shorter though, I have the OneUp 240mm dropper and it’s still quite a ways above the frame cause my legs are so long.
long legs with 240mm dropper here, im at 165 cranks and I hate pedal strikes :D
I already went to 155 on me ebike over a year ago and just the other day went to 155 on my regular bike. So much better than 165 , less pedal strikes and climbing especially on technical climbs is a lot easier. Ebike just less pedal strikes.
I rode 175mm forever thinking it was the best way to get leverage.
I went to 170mm on one of my hardtail bikes and it felt really good. I tried 165mm on my all mountain full suspension and it felt amazing
I do not think i would like the shorter cranks as much on the hardtail. I would love to get my wife on some 150-155 cranks. Her size small bike came with 170mm. Canfield makes shorter cranks and I believe Heir does for kids?
Nice job with the video. I love that you guys collaberated with so many people when you were in the states!
I was wondering about leverage as well? How did your shorter crank affect your power transfer from legs to wheels during climbs or sprints?
@ I found spinning to be better. For hard climbs you can tell the difference the power stroke feels shorter, I wonder if an oval chainring would be beneficial. It is recomendad to drop chainring size to compensate for shorter cranks. Sprinting is fine.
Right crank length for the right sized bike. It’s simple! 🔥🔥🔥
its more for leg size not bike size,so you dont overstress your knees at the top of the stroke.
Is there a formula for the crotch-o-meter so we can measure at home?
That is over-simple thinking. Everything about selecting a bike always comes back to body size / bio-mechanics. Cranks, saddle height, bar width, stem, top and seat tube length... the list goes on. Not that simple!
Those are some sa’weet cranks!
😂😂😂 good times with the crotch’o’meter dude
@@richardpayne5176 lol, indeed 🍆
I learned, I laughed, it was a good time.
I'm 5'7-5'8 and ride a medium 2023 Norco Fluid FS A2 and I just googled it and it comes with 175 cranks from factory and now I feel like I need to change them.
Great video
I would love to have some 5dev cranks on my Santa Cruz Bullit e-bike, this is a MX/mullet and I do notice those pedal strikes more often than a full 29. I’ve gotten the pleasure to have them on my conventional bike and they felt like a game changer! Stoked to have a company like 5dev develop a product that makes a difference.
The big brands need to give us more options on crank lengths.
Yep...old news for me. I'm 6'2" and rode 175&185 cranks for most my life. 10 years ago I started riding more then ever and bought a new bike with a low slung bottom bracket and was forced to do something about it due to pedal strikes. So I went to 165. I couldn't believe the difference in cadence, control, ground clearance and comfortability.
I do enjoy a nice 180 crank but it has to be on a bike with a tall stance and ground clearance. I think bikes are just too small these days for that size cranks. This is all driven by the geometry of new bikes and the low bottom brackets. We need bigger bikes so 175-185 cranks can still be utilized for their obvious benefit... leverage!
I would love to try some shorter cranks as they would help get my feet out of the way for flip combos and the shorter cranks would bring my center of gravity closer and would help my spin tricks come around quicker!
I’d love to give my girlfriend these cranks. She’s four foot nine with short legs. She’s rock strikes everything on 160mm cranks so have these super short ones would be great.
This is awesome, I’m totally gonna look into dropping 15 or 20 mill from my crank arm length!
I picked up a bike for my kid once, 24" tires, 175mm cranks 😂 I found some 145mm short ones to throw on
I been using 155mm cranks this whole summer and really like them. Inseams is 30" with no shoes.
What is your tibia length. What's the sensation difference you feel?
Is it more comfortable?
@@actionong Not sure about tibia length but a tailor once told me while he was measuring me for a motorcycle leather suit said that my thigh upper leg length is longer than the average man my height. So my lower leg is shorter than the average man my height.
My trail bike is 155mm cranks while my Enduro is 165mm crank. This is mainly cause 165mm is available while 155mmm is not common. I got it to try it out and really am liking the 155mm. I actually can barely tell the difference between the two...could be cause of different bikes and different gearing. Both feels pretty comfortable and I can barely notice the longer 165mm. I mainly like the shorter cranks to reduce pedal strikes...But I can tell a difference between a 175mm, 170mm and 165mm. Ergonomically I much prefer the 165mm over the other two longer ones.
Who thought 175mm cranks for mtb was the way to go? Oh yea, shimano. In the late 70's it was 180mm for bmx and 170mm for road so I get it.
My old mate Mike Burrows (now past) always laughed about how long cranks are! Legend
In the car world shorter stroke crankshafts usually means higher rpm and you can always gear for torque.
I have recently went from 175mm cranks to 165mm, and oh my goodness it made a world of difference!!! If I could find some cranks that didn’t have to be custom made and only 160mm or maybe even 155mm i might try that in the future.
Could you please share your inseam length, like how the tool in the beginning of the video measures it?
This great stuff. Not to many company’s with different length cranks. Basically 170 or 175. If lucky some you can get at 165. That’s what I’m running on all my bikes. Would love to test not only shorter length on my Hardtails , but how compliant they are as well.
Epic vid! Mahalo
I dropped from 170 to 160. I prefer it and would like to try a 155. The only issue I had is the need to raise my seat. Seated pedaling puts the bars lower with 160 vs 170, but they are the same height when I am standing on the pedals.
I was BMX racing through the early 2000's as a dad with my kids now riding. I grew up on 175mm and even moving to 180mm as it was supposed to increase leverage.I ran those for years. When i got into MTB eveything came with 175s and because I wasnt racing sprints I thought that was fine. More recent years I have moved to 170's. I see the move toward shorter cranks but haven't been able to wrap my head around it, though , for Anna being short, that make sense of course. Im 6ft tall. I would like to try some 165 and 160s and since I live in San Diego , if 5DEV ever has a test day I would like to try them out. Fantastic video you guys.It's got me thinking!
It's not so much your total height but more about the height of your knees, or more accurately the vertical height you can raise your knees before it starts to be uncomfortable. How upright your riding position is and the flexibility of your knees plays a part to what your maximum comfortable crank will be. Aggressive aero riding positions need shorter cranks, all else being equal.
I had to switch bikes and moved from 210mm cranks to 180mm and I hate it. Can't wait to get my 210mm back in action again.
Entreagued about this topic now
That Crotch-o-meter is really has me curious as to whether I should change out my 170s. I’m 5’7 and get knee pain and pedal strikes nearly every time I ride. When I started riding in the 90s, 175s were the norm. I’ve even run 180s on single speeds, because they were supposed to have more leverage. I’m slowly seeing smaller sizes making their way onto bikes. I’ll definitely be trying a smaller size on my next cranks. Great video!
Longer cranks do have more leverage, that's how levers work.