🎆 Get 25% off Blinkist premium and enjoy 2 memberships for the price of 1! Start your 7-day free trial by clicking here: www.blinkist.com/goodtimesbadtimes If you want to support our mission, you can do so via: 📌 Patreon: www.patreon.com/GTBT ➡ Paypal: paypal.me/GoodTimesBadTime th-cam.com/users/sgaming/emoji/7ff574f2/emoji_u2733.png
An interesting perspective by: Turkish academician: Prof. Dr. Celal Şengör Mongolian academician: Tomurtogoo O. " Peoples of the Turkic race are nomads and therefore these people live togheter with their animals and not only keep their economy afloat by grazing animals but also by raiding their neighbours. As far as we know the first group that got contact with these people are the Chinese, now if we look at their sources (before BC) it writes that the "Tujue 突厥 came" in other words the Turks came. As you know this topic has been controversial for a long time by raising the question where the Huns(Xiongnu/Hiung-nu) of Metehan Turks? Now when the Chinese are talking about these people they call them "Tujue 突厥" and if we look at what they are describing like certain features that are beneficial for themselves, for example their army for these people (Chinese). The very first "unit of ten thousand" system (Old Turkic: tümän; Mongolian: Түмэн, tümen; Old Chinese: 萬, tman; Turkish: tümen; Hungarian: tömény;) that applied this are these people. They thought the Romans did but no it was used much earlier. This very concept an army of 10 like the very words: "onbaşı(10) - yüzbaşı (100) - binbaşı (1000)" originates from here and is very old and this concept has come to Dzjengis Khan as well and so he used this very same organisational structure in his army. Dzjengis Khan does not establish his capital where he was born but in Otuken - Mongolia (the very first capital of Turkic Khaganate and Uyghur Khaganate) in other words he preserves the Turkish tradition that this place is the capital because he sees himself as the continuation of these people.
Look I went to Kharkhorin in Mongolia and nearby this place there is a town Karakurum and in this town the Mongolians build a huge monument and has 3 corners. And looking at the front side of this monument there is a giant map of an empire drawn and under this they wrote "Mongolian nation". Then you go to the back and you can see another giant map you can read Xiongnu/Hiung-nu nation so basically the nation that the Chinese refer these peoples as "Tujue 突厥". Then we go to the next side and you can read "Turkish nation" and there is also an giant map of the Göktürks and when I saw this I was shocked. And there I was with a friend who brought me there a geologist and scholar Tomurtogoo and asked him wait now this is your national heritage! (40km away from where the Orchoninscripties in Otuken are placed) and further I asked him what are the Turks doing here? aren't you Mongolians!? Tomurtogoo looked at me and explained: We do not make such a distinction, he said. When he says we are a nation, he means there, is a group that culturally, linguistically and to a very large extent biologically hold each other togheter because for this race the very physical attributes and characteristics are common to all of these peoples. They don't look like the Chinese, they don't look like the Tibetans in the south, next to them they don't look like the Indo-Europeans. Therefore there is an Turkic race, but the Romans rightly have known that these peoples have had great empires and are in population quite small. The nomadic economy cannot feed large populations. After the invention of agriculture, cities emerged and large populations were fed and also have been mixed with other populations. When the Turks went to the east they started mixing with the Chinese and when they went to the west they started mixing with the Indo-Europeans. Therefore racial characteristics decrease but that does not mean that there is no race anymore. "
Yes, after the collapse and disintegration of the Russian Federation and its disaggregation into its constituent republics, Yakutia (Turkic) as well as the Islamic federal states (Ingushtan, Dagestan, Chechnya) will be the inevitable objects of Turkish political ambitions, Chinese too, and so China and Turkiye will become opponents, and we ought favor Turkiye in their coming rivalry: but first we must destroy the Russian military, oust Putin, and disaggregate the criminal state into its elements. -Eric Engle
I From Israel I Am Khazar Jewish Why You Don't Upload Israel In The Turkic Countries To? Mostly Israeli Are Khazar Turks That Convert To Judaism Ashkenazi Is Khazars!
Turkic states in Russia should declare independence from Russia. Also bring Muslim Caucasians region in Russia too We can be stronger if we all muslim country establish One Union for our Ummah interest
Are you serious? I thought you guys do not like us Anatolian Turks that much. Believe me we just want a Turkic version of EU. We have nothing to do with Russian like imperialism unlike what Iranian and Russian nationalists claim..
small linguistics note for clarity. the turkic languages originated in southern Siberia and spread south east eventually to modern day Turkey, not the other way around. the video is amazing, another great one!
@@cacogenicist ironically most of mongolia was turkic lands while the mongolic n tungusic people started in what is now called manchuria til the Xiongnu(mostly turkic) were defeated by the Xianbei/Donghu(mostly Mongolic) and were slowly pushed out west. The Mongolic Rouran(Nirun) ruled over the Turkic tribes til the Gokturks took over and ruled over the Mongolic tribes, then the Mongolic Khitan took power and it was back and forth. (I left out the uyghur who ruled mongolia in the 8-9th century)
Completely wrong. Turkish agricultural words are unique. What crops can be cultivated in Siberia? We will not learn our own history from the irrational theories of westerners..
@@siyacer yes before westernization japan had some similarities to turanic peoples,and still did after westernization, but after anime!?....japan is not turan.
this is just beginning, keep watching you will be shocked when you see the future position of Turkey i am a japanese, I have been living in Turkey for 7 years turkey is industrializing incredibly fast, developing technology i am comparing the current state of Turkey to the state of the people's republic of China at the beginning of the 2000s
@@nikolasmacedonites917 ben bir Türküm çok net söylemeliyim ki bir yılda bile inanılmaz değişiyor çok hızlı bir gelişme var nasıl oluyor anlamıyorum, 2020 ile 2024 arasında inanılmaz bir fark var, çok hızlı sanayileşme var, eskiden sanayiler İstanbul'daydi devlet kredi desteği vermeye başladı, sanayiler doğu ve Karadeniz bölgelerine yayılmaya başladı.
I am a Japanese Canadian thinking of applying to an ma in Ottoman history. I’ve never taken an interest until now, turkey really looks to have an interesting future ahead. I’ve heard Turkish and Japanese have similar grammar is this true?
Fascinating how Turkey, Russia, and China are all vying for influence in the central Asian states. I hope there will be future videos detailing how this drama plays out.
Modern Central Asia only consists of post-Soviet "stan countries" Historical Central Asia however refers to a vast geography stretching from modern Central Asia all the way to the Mongolian-Manchurian grassland of the Far East
@@itisprofile teşekkür ederiz orada yaşayan arkadaşlarımdan biliyorum hepside beni aradı iyimisin diye sordular erzak falan gönderdiler hükümeti bilmem ama benim size güvenim sonsuz
Much of russia is turkish dominated, with the turkic populations booming while the ethnic russian population crashes. A broken up russia would allow for much more Turkish influence in the region.
This is probably hard to see for an observer from the outside.. but it's not just on a diplomatic level that Turkey and the other Turkic states have gotten exponentially closer in the past decade. 10/15 years ago, if I looked up videos on Turkic history the Turkic comments were 90% Turkish, 5 to 10% Azerbaijani. If I looked up virdeos on different Turkic peoples, most of the comments from other Turkic people were largely Turkish comments etc etc. Today, if you look up videos on Turkic history .. you see a diversity of comments from all over the Turkic world. From independent Turkic states in central Asia, to Ughurs to Tatars and other Turkic people from autonomous Russian federal republics etc The Turkish comments get drowned out by the amount of interest shown by other Turkic people. Azerbaijan and Turkey have always been close. But today? Esp after Karabag? The saying "two states, one nation" which both people have used for decades is basically a reality. We are closer than ever before. Turkish language videos be it news, tv, shows, series and movies are full of Azerbaijani and also central Asian Turkic comments. My mother came to visit me recently and asked if I could put some Turkish tv show on. I did and noticed the live chat under the video was almost entirely Azerbaijani from both Azerbaijan but also Iran. And a lot of Turkmen (Iraqi, Syrian Turkmen) comments etc. Turkic people throughout are rediscovering their own identity and their connection to each other. And I think it helps that Turkey is successful in projecting soft and hard power all over. Be it Syria/Idlib, Libya, Karabag or the destruction Turkish systems have been sowing in Ukraine against the Russians.. Turkey has been humiliating the former USSR and kinda showed that in a sense Russia is a paper tiger. Especially now with Ukraine I think even the biggest fans and assimilated pro Russian people in central Asia have taken a step back and reassessed the situation. Because not only is Russia fighting a war that it's getting humiliated in, basically everyone agrees it's not a just war. On top of that Russia loves to threaten their neighbors constantly .. like Russian parliamentarians saying that Kazakhstan isn't even a real country etc etc (basically same stuff they said about Ukraine) Anyway, my point is. This isn't just diplomatic efforts between countries. The more there is a will from the people to connect, learn and discover about each other the more pressure there is on governments to act on it. The more politicians, teachers, diplomats, influencers, historians, sociologists etc will grow up to want to further discover and expand those bonds. Not because there is some profit but because it becomes a point of pride, ideology, love a passion. I think this is just a start to be honest, and depending on how things go we could see a much higher level of cooperation between these states. And I truly do hope that happens. Not just because I am proud of my heritage, but because we are stronger, more prosperous and more capable together.
All nations of Central Asia are East Turks. We Eastern Turks will build one union with our West brothers which are Turkye and Azerbadjan. One Turan will be recreated! My best wiches to all Turk kind!
An important factor of course is military capabilities. It's not a secret that the Turkic Council has ambitions to be its own defense pact at one point and for that you need a varsity of good weapon systems, not limited to drones. Like the current Ukrainian govt asks the world to help them with, you need anti-air, tanks, fighter jets etc. Turkish defense industry contractors are working 24/7 on developing these difficult systems for decades now. The idea is of course first and foremost to be independent in an increasingly chaotic world, but also to be lending a handing hand for those that are in alignment. You don't have to look back too long ago, just 5 or 6 years or so, this would have been considered a fantasy. But seeing the achievements of the last years in different fields of which most won't make it to mainstream news cycles, there is a strong reason to be hopeful at least.
@@firasajoury7813 if Turkey and Iran cooperate together to build a Turko-Iranic Union, just like th Franco-Germany co-leadership in EU, it is more realistic and will work, but if Iran and ther Iranic peoples are excluded, it will be a geopolitical problem,
I don’t know if it was intentional, but you seem to imply that Turkey conquered westward into Central Asia. This is incorrect. Turks, who from my understanding are more or less Mongol related people, began in Central Asia and conquered the old Persian/Arab Islamic Empire and create the various empires in southwest Asia. This culminated in the Ottomans and finally Turkey. This was about 9th-10th century onward, I think. So Turkey is trying to reconnect with the Turkish homelands
Was just about to point that out. He says that Turkic people originated in anatolia and spread to Central Asia and the Siberian tundra, but it's the other way around.
It's a little more complicated than that. The creators of Turkic identity was definitely first documented somewhere between China and Russia, but the modern definition of Turkic identity is cultural and linguistic family as opposed to an ethnic one. Although you are absolutely right in how and where it originated, the main seed that kept the ideology alive originated in Western Anatolia, under the founder of latter renamed the Ottoman empire. Through the Ottomans was this spark connected and Turned into a family. Before that, it was strangers that were conquered and Turkified. It all comes down to perspectives, was it chicken or the egg? If you gave birth in three countries and abandoned your kids, would they be yours or would you have to visit them and reveal to them who they are. If you don't, they would remain a German child growing up with a single mother, never knowing she was an Ottoman.
Another important reason for the success of the Turks was their superior military technology and art of war . These nomads from the Steppes could be credited with introducing ' the age of the horse .
The Indo-Europeans were the first nomadic horse-bound peoples to conquer large swathes of Eurasia, but the Turks and Mongols ushered in an era of steppe-dominance never seen before in history. Also, the steppe-peoples were my most means technologically inferior to the settled peoples that they conquered, but they used a horde-type strategy to great effect.
@@tnk.2033 that’s not what we were talking about and even then i can go ahead and say its widely agreed upon domestication of horses happened in Ukraine.
I wish nothing but the best for the people of Central Asia and Turkey, and I have some serious distrust that either Russia or China is much interested in driving economic growth in the region as opposed to just taking what they can purely for their own benefit. That said, I find old men with dreams of recreating past imperial glory (such as Erogen seems to be) seldom have the capability to deliver on the dream, and given Turkey's current economic state I don't know that their present administration is going to be able to do much in practical terms to pull this off in a way that creates tangible benefits for the people of the region.
o yea of little faith, all the things in this video and a tenfold unmentioned more is due to the planning and positioning of his excellency president Erdogan. Just hope you live long enough to see the fruits of his decades long labours.
1，Wikipedia: In a sample of 54 Kazakhs and 119 Altaian Kazakhs, the main paternal lineages of Kazakhs are: C (66.7% and 59.5%), O (9% and 26%), N (2% and 0%), J (4% and 0%), R (9% and 1%) respectively CNO, typical Mongolian/ Mongoloid haplogroup (80%+) Kazakhs genetically are similar to Mongolian N dominates Urals and Yakutia O dominate Japanese Korean Chinese N and O have a common ancestor no-m214 C2 dominates Mongolian Kazakh Tungusic The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria .During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans). 2，The Mongols= East Asians, Southeast asian, Altaic people (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic speaking people), American Indians/Native Americans East Asians and Native Americans are Sinodont They carry the EDAR gene, found in ancient and modern East Asians, Southeast Asians, Nepalese and Native Americans but not common in African or European populations 3，C1 and C2 have a common ancestor C C1a Ainu people and Japanese（Jomon people） C1b Polynesia Melanesia Australian Aborigines，Asean C2：Mongolians， Turkic peoples, Siberian tribes , Tungus，Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans，Native american，Tungusic peoples Modern Turks are Turkified Anatolians The Anatolians need a new identity after losing out the Ottoman Empire. They wanted to steal the whole steppe heritage of Eurasia created by Xiongnu, Rouran, Mongols and GokTurks to make them feel great again. That's why Turkish belongs to Altaic language, but Anatonians appearance are totally different from Japanese Korean Mongolian
@@Hattushil Tajikistan doesn't need expensive drones from Turkey, especially after their failing in Ukraine. Iran is going to build a drone factory in Tajikistan.
@@jacobjonm0511 , Turkish drones have already proven quality world wide, Ukranians sing for TB2s for a reason… 😊 But hey, Tajikistan does not need an Iranian drone factory in their country, they can buy the same drones from Alibaba much cheaper as all parts of Iranian drones including their engines can be purchased from Alibaba… 😂
Idea of Panturkism shaped before Turkiye Republic, I think it was 1800s, Ottoman times. Turks from cross all asia are usually see Panturkism as family union.
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
The Turks certainly did not cause either the Migration Period or the Crusades. The remnants of the Hunnic invasion were the Magyar, who clearly speak a unique and distinctly not Turkish language.
@@jensboettiger5286 The First Crusade happened due to Seljuk Invasions of Anatolia and Levant and Crusaders promised to return ex-Byzantine lands to the Byzantine Empire. The Crusades were caused by the Turks. And the Migration Period was a domino effect started by the Xiongnu. So it is a question of if Xiongnu were Turkic or Mongolic, and the current academic consensus is that they were Turkic.
@@kmmmsyr9883 No the cause of the crusades had nothing to do with Turks(nationality) and everything to do with religion. So you can say that the spread of islam into the levant was the underlying reason. Thus the Arabs whom originally spread the religion is the cause. But it is true that the Seljuk turks ruled most of Anatolia and the levant when the first crusade happened.
3:58 what? Its exactly the other way around. Turkish languages entered from siberia and reached further and further west. Thats such a major difference, it kind of makes me worry about the research effort that went in here
@@seb_5969 Truth is, there is no definitive answer to the question. Very hard to pin-point where it originated, because the Turkic ethnos includes various ancient cultures. It could be from anywhere from Eastern Europe to North Siberia.
@@b0leg23 fact of the matter is: it didnt originate in near anatolia and reached central asia from there but the other way around. Be it Kasachstan, Mongolia or even further
The Huns and Goths who conquered and ruled Europe are also likely Turkic. The Scythians, Huns, Mughals, Mamluks and many other Turkic tribes invaded and ruled South Asia for 2000+ years. A local language here, Urdu, is itself named after a Turkic word meaning "army" or "camp". In Pakistan atleast, people still commonly use Turkic names like Khan or Beg (Bek/Bey), Chughtai (Chaghtai Khanate), Chengez (Genghis), Gujjar (Gurjaria/Georgia), Khwaja (Hodja / this maybe Turco-Persian), Bukhari (from Bukhara), Kakazai/Loi/Tarkani (Tarkhan), Popalzai (Hepthalite), Khilji (Qalach), Agha (Aga), Affandi (Effendi), Barlas, Ghazi, Taimoor (temur), Gul, Pasha, Sinan, Arsalan, Aslam (Aslan), Shahin, Amir, Zeeshan, Ata, Bahadur, Miral, Muhiddin, Gulshan, Nilofer.
Outside of Central Asia, in the Caucasus, Azerbaijan is also a Turkic country. A majority of ethnic Azeris actually live in northwestern Iran, in the provinces of Iranian Azerbaijan. Obviously, there's the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan to be considered here, but I do wonder about the potential for conflict in Iranian Azerbaijan as a result of pan-Turkism. There's also many Turkic minority groups in Russia, that are native to the territory of the Russian Federation (eg. Tatars, Chuvash peoples, Siberian Turks, etc.). I could see where pan-Turkism might be a thorn in the side of the Iranian and Russian governments, especially with NATO member Turkey leading the charge. I also feel some concerns about attempts to undermine the unity of NATO on the parts of governments threatened by pan-Turkism, namely by encouraging conflict between Greece and Turkey. Back to Central Asia, Tajikistan speaks a form of the Persian language (Tajik), but there are many Turkic speakers there too.
Conflicts between Greece and Turkey is just election technique of Erdogan and his Greek counterpart. No Turk ever said to me ever about how they hated Greece. But i had lots of people saying that Greeks are just us within a different religious costume. We even have a saying in Turkey that goes like this: if two turkish people and two greek people meets, they fight. If one Turkish person and one Greek person meets, they would just sit on a sunset near the sea and drink Raki while singing songs. This explains why there will never be a greek turkish war even if there's a whole Turkic alliance even in terms like EU. Some countries want this war to happen though and would do anything to provoke it, especially Russia because it would further isolate Turkey within Nato and force it to become closer allies with Russia.
The Azeris in Iran aren't really happy about being ripped of from power in 1925 by the British. I think a conflict within depends on the behaviour of the Persians. If they continue to be that arrogant and call the Azeris cockroaches, the Turks (not Turkey Turks but in a Turkic meaning) will raise their flag again in Tehran.
@@e.h.4789 nice revisionism. Once russia gets exhausted, iran will get back all the lands that rightfully belong it all the way to dagestan. This whole shitshow started bc turkey simply invented a turkic race out of the blue and using its definition as a sword.
@@ikramyagdran4492 LOL.... You describe the irony of this world politics... Having had many turkish friends (and ladies) I can not but agree with you. We are the same. The crazy thing though is that instead of realising our common ancestry, you choose to identify with Central Asia (!!!) and Far East races (!!). To me, after having to admit that Turks are some of my best friends, the only option in order to explain what my eyes see remains human stupidity.... How can I be European, talk to you, we both see we are the same, but in the end you think your origins are for Mongolia? hahahaaaa..... Un_freaking_believable, yet true... You call the Azeris your brothers and they come from Iran. And us (your old family) enemies, or just neighbors at best. Nowadays I see the Ukranians eat the story that Kievan Rus were not Russians but their ancestors (!!! 😆🥳 disregarding the obvious name similarity Rus=Russian!!). And they are stupid enough to believe it !!! Plus there is the other story that circulates in Kiev that Kievan Rus are not slavic, but Germanic (!!!). LOL.... Disregarding the fact that today you can just take a DNA test and see exactly who you are.... I saw the other day that stupid Turkish girl on YT, taking her DNA results that came 75% greek !!! 😝😝 And she was surprised!!!! 🤣🤣 And I wonder: WHY don't you all take a freaking DNA test to see how Asian you are?? You call youselves Turks. Are you Turkic, really??? I don't think so. Ottomans were Turks. And Seltjuks. But they vanished many years ago. You just have the name and a turkic dialect. But why don't you try to look? Don't you want to know who you are?
As someone of Azeri heritage, I will have to admit that Azerbaijanis, while being Turkic Speakers, are of Iranic stock. The Azeris in Iran, in particular, are genetically tied to Persians and Kurds. The Azeris in the Republic of Azerbaijan are actually genetically closer to Armenians than to the original Turkic groups of Central Asia. They also carry Iranic ancestry, but to a lesser degree. Culturally, Azeris are heavily Iranic. They celebrate the Zoroastrian holiday of Nowruz. Their foods are closest to Persian foods. Their customs are closest to those of other Iranic groups. The name of Azeris is even Iranic. It comes from Old Persian Atar, Middle Persian Adar, and New Persian Azar. All mean "FIRE." Azerbaijan had the most Zoroastrian temples in pre-Islamic times. It was the Land of Fire. Yashasun Azerbaijan!
Salom,I'm from O'zbekistan and I hope one day All turkic people will unite and those Who live in China ,Russia,Iran,Iraq,Syria,Lebanon,Afghanistan,Tadjikistan and etc. will get their independence.
@@CyrustheGreat-j7j lol🤣,keep dreaming,When Temurid ruled central asia and middle east,He took so many Aryan slaves to Central Asia.Even iran is not really Persian,persians in Iran are not even 50% of the whole population ,iran is just a multinational persian speaking country, I will tell about; Tabriz,Tehran,Zanjan,Ardabil,Hamedan Azerbaijani speaking provinces,Mashhad Khorosoni turks province,Gorgan Turkmans province,Shiraz Kashgate Turks province .Btw i didnt write about other Ethnicities in Iran,and are u still thinking Samarkand and Bukhara is persian😀
@@madameenmamadaliyev1727 I'm not Persian I'm TAJIK from Tajikistan. Timurid empire has nothing to do with uzbaks Timur was from mongol (barlos🇲🇳)tribe. U uzbeks hasn't history u r mongolian with Tajik culture.
I also wish independence for Kurds living under Turkish occupation in Anatolia and independence for Armenians living in Astrakh living under Azerbaijan occupation
Just for you to know we are not the world apart. We are the core of the Eurasian continent. And Turkic Kaganate was loooooong before the ottoman empire ever established.
Typical altrite appeasing pole, and his knowledge about the "outside world" and cultures. I dont even believe he has some weird agenda to disparage Turkey. The averages there don't know jack about Turkic/Turkish history and they all perceive themselves to be experts when it comes to our country. Typical euro dunning-kruger syndrome.
Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222
@@alashorda2206 This is not true there is an distinction but that doesn't mean they didn't coexist as a group making up lots of dynasties. You could also have said that if the Turks weren't there Genghis khan wouldn't be Genghis khan.
@@Lawliet_____ This is true. Genghis Khan Turkic. He is from the Kiyat tribe, from the Borjigen klan. Even Genghis is a Turkic name. Khan is the rank of Turkic power. And the Khalkhas (NeoMongol) call their Khan "Hontayji". Khalkhas (NeoMongol) came to modern Mongolia in the 16th century. And Mongolia has always belonged to the Eastern Turkic Khaganate. (Genghis Khan's real name is "Temurchin". And "Temujin" this is misspelled in Chinese. The Chinese make every name Chinese).
@@alashorda2206 yes, some used Turkic names and language but that doesn't mean they suddenly change from Mongol to a Turk (also vice versa - assimilations - intermixing) genetically but that doesn't matter because the Mongols don't make a distinction of the Turks as if to say "we're one big group" there where times when the Turks got assimilated in to Mongols and sometimes the Mongols got assimilated in to Turks.
Average polish/eastern euro knowledge about the outside world... On par with that of muhricuhns. Not even bothering to research a subject properly, yet having plenty of opinions based on assumptions and stereotypes and wishes to be taken seriously as a politics vidmaker. The very definition of Dunning-Kruger effect...
So while Tajikistan is in central Asian, they’re an Iranian people while Azeris ar Turkic, which is part of why the Turks support Azerbaijan against Armenia. Obviously they had hatred towards them a century ago when they caused Armenians to flee after almost eradicating the nation, but it’s important to note the almost contiguous extent of Indo-Iranians from Kurdistan to South Asia versus Turkic peoples who also occupy ‘Stan’ countries. (India is Hindustan and had a much higher Muslim population before partition and considerable Persian cultural influence through trade and conquest.) So the actual interplay between Central Asia has been even more complex as Chinese, Iranian and Indic influences (the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan for instance) and the presence of Turkic/Mongolic names in northern Indian due to Mongols and their Mughal successors. So Turkey has a lot of competition for influence, but as the largest predominantly Turkic state, they have similar language, religion, and descended culture on their side.
Turkey also has something none of those others countries dont........Turkish Hollywood (Yesilcam Sokak)!! I never cease to be shocked at how popular Turkish tv dramas on Netflix, movies and music are in United States (?!?), Latin America, Africa- no need to mention Arab countries of course. Iranian and Indian teenagers watching Turkish romance series or listening to Turkish rap music will more of have an impact than you think.
Armenia has been around for thousands of years. So I’m sure they conquered land, but the Turks tried to kill them off, so whatever beef Azeris have with them pales in comparison…
India was ruled by Turkic dynasties for 1000 years (Babur dynasty or Mughals being the masters). What Indian think as iersusk is indeed Turkic. Iran itself was ruled by Turkic dynasties until WW1 when English brought Fars people to power in order to have free hand in exploiting Iran oil by English ….
We all Turks need to join together, no matter what others think or say. Otherwise we gonna lose everything, where is Turkestan now? Look what is going on in Eastern Turkestan!
I’m glad there is a rebound of the various Turkic People. At minimum, I’m seeing more culture, history, and customs being shared on TH-cam. Thank you for sharing!
The threat of the Organisation of Turkish States is perhaps even greater for Beijing than it is for Moscow, when you take into consideration the Uyghur who are a turkic people and the 'East Turkestan' independence movement in the region. A strong Turkic union could lead to a similar situation as we saw with Pakistan/Afghanistan and the funding of terrorist organisations in the country. The stronger the union becomes, the greater the risk of Uyghur seccesion.
even all Turkic narions and ethnics are untied, their GDP and industrial capacity all together is still lower than a single province of Guangdong, so their threat is limited, the time of nomad empire is kver, excpet Turkey, no othet Turkic country is industrial and economic great power, how can they be really strong?
That's probably true, according to a CGTN documentary released in 2021, the former director of the Xinjiang Education Department deliberately changed the 2003, 2009 Uyghur langugage text books for primary school and middle school to promote Pan-Turkism, Pan-Islamism, reglious extremism and ethnic animosity against Han Chinese, featuring Turkic and Islamic historic figures prominently while making very little reference to PRC, Chinese history or culture. Those text books were used for 13 years starting from 2004. So half a generation of Uyghurs that studied in Uyghur language schools would've been affected.
I wonder how this will play out for the Uyghur people currently undergoing a genocide at the hands of Beijing. I'm talking about their hopes for the genocide to end and for the PRC to be held accountable, but also their aspirations for statehood and their place in the arrangement of Central Asia as envisioned by Erdogan in Ankara. I know that China has been able to buy the silence of Central Asian states via the Belt and Road scheme, but I wonder just how much Pan-Turkic ideology at the grassroots and state levels might push back against them. Especially with emerging de facto independent Turkic states like Tatarstan and Bashkortostan facing the impending collapse of the Russian Federation.
'As a result this centuries-long presense of English peoples in British Isles contributed to a cultural and linguistic expansion, with American language extending far beyond the border of the modern United States, and spilling over into the British territories, even reaching Europe.' Lol. If you're wondering what the heck have I written, this is just like what the author says about Turkic languages coming from Turkey to the Central Asia, while the truth is completely opposite. I think this all stems from the old confusion of adjectives Turkish and Turkic, which then, if you add few other misconceptions and ignorance, creates... this.
@@xyeBNot you, the channel owner. You are just a weeaboo, of unknown ethnicity(probably with a history of colonial subjecthood under Imperial Japanese occupation, I assume, but I could be wrong)
From the beginning the Turks were noted for their superior military qualities, which seem to have lain mainly in their use of mounted bowmen and the nomadic speed of their cavalry. From this time on the Caliphs relied to an increasing extent on Turkish troops and commanders, to the detriment of the older cultured peoples in Islam, the Arabs and the Persians. The progressive militarization of the regime increased their strength. By the eleventh century the Turks were entering the world of Islam, not only as individuals recruited by capture or purchase, but by the migration of whole tribes of free nomadic Turks still organized in their own traditional way. Lewis, B. (2002) Arabs in history. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.160
3:57 that's just blatantly wrong Turkic people originated in Mongolia/ Siberia, as they migrated West, they mingled with local ethnicities. So Turks in Turkey are not the original Turkic people. So to claim Turkic people spread beyond the Turkish republic, is like claiming English people spread beyond the American Republic
@@John-.-Smith Nothing abnormal in that. Ottoman's were a mix of Oghuz and Tatar/Kipchak's. It was actually a confederation with remnants of Golden Hord.
Thank you for this information. As a Turk, the information is correct, but it is clear that Central Asia still hesitates to show their will under the hegemony of China and Russia. While China penetrates Central Asia for its underground resources, which are more important to him, Russia's eastern security passes through the security of Central Asia. In this direction, I believe that Central Asia should be more stable in order for the Turkish union to have as constructive and solid foundations as the European Union. While Turkey is dealing with all geographical problems, it will do everything in its power for the geopolitics of Central Asia.
even athe 6 Turkic nations united, is is not enough to be a great global power, unless they are able to be untied with the other Iranic people too, so the two leaders show be Tuekry and Iran together, just like the Germano-Latin axes in European Union,
@@daulz6905 You should be an exception among Qazaqtar. You can even be a non-Kazakh Kazakhstani. If you are really a Qazaq, you know that most of Kazakh people are aware of the situation. They share Turkic and panturkist vision of their forefathers like Shäkerim, Alixan Bökeixanov, Mağjan Jumabaiuly, Mustafa Şoqai. You should be one of those Orysquls who are brainwashed. You do not represent majority of Kazakh people. Words above are your individual ideas.
Turks in Turkey arent even Turks lol, theyre a mix of different conquered peoples. Theres nothing more delusional than a white looking Turk proudly believing he’s turkic along with his central asian “brothers”. Deep inside they know they are descendants of en$laved people. Its a fake artificial country, nothing more.
@Nadid Linchestein There's no such concept like every nation must live in where they are originally comes from. It's plain stupid even thinking that but you don't seem so bright anyway, do you?
Thank you for reporting on the Central Asian Region and Turkey's plan to turn it into its sphere of influence. As security and trade alliances are being realigned and reformed, the tentacles of deceased Empires reach into the present for their hoped-for resurrection. The French, Russians, and US fought long costly wars to subjugate Afghanistan for their exploits and transport routes for gas and oil pipelines from Central Asia. Each abandoned their plans. We are living in extremely dangerous times. Much hangs in the balance for the billions of people who inhabit these regions.
@@sluchy7962 Turkeys inflation is entirely self made by erdogans fanatical stubborness to follow islamic economic policy rather than ecpnomic policy in the real world.
Iran has many ethnic groups such as Persians, Turks, Kurds, Lers, Azeri, Baluch, Gilak, Arabs, etc., and most Iranians do not have Arab roots, and most of the Turkic countries today, such as Uzbekistan and the Republic of Azerbaijan, have Iranian roots because in the past And in empires like the Achaemenids, they were part of Iran And your statement about the DNA of Iranians is baseless (although most Iranian ethnic groups have similar DNA)
I realized that the people who prepared the video did not fully understand Turkish nationalism. We, the Turks, were a single state when we were at war with China thousands of years ago. Afterwards, we spread around the world as families (clans) because the conditions required it. Turks are now what they were then. We are brothers and Muslims. If you want to know the Turks, research Kürşat's story. "I brought you Kürşat's grudge." :)
That’s arguable, as linguistic and archaeological evidence points more towards an Altai mountain hypothesis. Yet, that still is a pretty sound evidence for a Manchurian origin, although it is less accepted.
Historically, Turks had control over on China, they're not native to there, origin is probably from between northern central Asia and northern Kazakhstan
It's a nice sentiment to feel a form of connection to other, similar cultures. However, Pan-Xism has been tried numerous times up to the present day and have never worked. It has always ended in some sort of conflict, often with a devastating and completely unnecessary loss in human life. Do not repeat the mistakes of the past, learn from it instead. Be under no illusion, Turkey is using Pan-Turkism as a path to hegemony. Just like Prussia with Pan-Germanism, Serbia and Russia with Pan-Slavism, Iraq with Pan-Arabism, and so on. The path for Prussian hegemony in a unified Germany dates back to the time of Bismarck in the late 1800's. Even today, I recommend you ask a Bavarian what he/she thinks about having a Prussian telling them what to do. "Saupreiss" (Prussian Pig/Swine) is a traditional derogatory term in Bavaria. Serbia using Pan-Slavism as her path to hegemony in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later named Yugoslavia. We all know what happened to Yugoslavia. Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist party likewise wanted to create a unified Arab state with Iraq as hegemon, using Pan-Arabism and Arab nationalism as a pretext for it's path to hegemony. Another project doomed to crash and burn. Pan-Turkism cannot, and will not end any differently. Once most Turkic nations and populations realize that Turkey is really just using them to establish a regional hegemony, with them as subjects/colonies or client states, then discontent and rebellion will ensue.
O we know that TURKYE is trying to dominate other TURKC COUNTRY and PEOPLE but what choice do we have when you have enemies like Russia China and Iran TURKS with whom we have the same Language Culture and History + RELIGION is the best candidate but I agree with you about that rest
What catastrophe? If we throw away the negatively charged idea of Pan-Slavism as "Russian Pan-Slavism" it was a huge success, compared to pan-nationalism movements. Scandinavianism was dead before it was even a thing, Pan-Germanicism brought us Hitler, Pan-Arabism had more states that have all fallen (rather violently usually) aside from UAE, the only sucessful pan-nationalist state to this day. Pan-Turkism was never realised in the slightest. Meanwhile we had Yugoslavism that got buried by Germans (They have literally sworn to dismantle Yugoslavia, also the darkest page of NATO history), Czechoslovakia, a wildly sucessful initiative dismantled by politicans without the general opinion's consent (most were against dissolving) which happened in a very elegant way anyways. Polish-Czechoslovak confederation didn't get to be a thing becuase first Germans destroyed them as independent states, then Soviets demanded to stop the works on it. We should give it a try, just without Russians so we'd have no warmongering maniacs inside. A united Slavia would solve balkan problems by giving Serbs a stronger state, which would curb their expansionism, Czechs couldnnot care about anything in the world as they do, Slovaks could stay in their mountains, Poles would get 90% ofnthe Commonwealth back and be happy with it, Ukrainians would be safe from Russia and Belarusians could be free.
@@DehydratedDarkness I wouldn't exactly call any of that functional. The balkans is a pile of nations that hate each other more then anyone else, same with eastern slavs. Might have something to do with people not wanting to be under Serbias grip. Even in the West, the potential of a czechoslovak-polish state died the second polish artillery guns started to bomb cities as a prelude to the invasion which later got pulverized by the czechoslovak army. Same with the later invasion when czechoslovakia got occupied as Poland saw it as a opportunity to get more land as a Germany’s friend. Same with '68 when polish troops came to crush the czechoslovak uprising. There are precisely 2 nations which have any possibility of joining together, lasting and not immidiately trying to kill each other, the Czechs and Slovaks and even that has failed. Sure, we do like each other and we were one of the very few peaceful breakups of countries in modern history but we still broke. It is true that the politicians divided the country without a referendum but the people were asked and the answers was either apathy or agreement with the breakup. The Czechs wanted to ditch the Slovaks to get into the eu faster while Slovaks were absolutely and completely fed up with the iron grip rule of Prague and how they were little more then a overglorified colony. That's why, even if you asked today, in either of the countries the answer to reunification is a resounding No
@@Brother_Rony Last polls I have checked had 54% Don't know 30-something yes for reunifcation in Czechis, the more apathetic part. The matter of Polish-Czechoslovak border in particular is problematic, but the truth is it was the Czechoslovaks that struck first and genocided the border populace, in fear of the referendums being in favor of Poland. Then Poland seized the very same territories back (without agreement with Hitler, they just walked in in the general turmoil), then Slovakia has seized them again. They are In Czechia and Slovakia today anyways. So much blood spilled over a bit of land. Wouldn't a union state help? The politicans were negotianing the Polish-Czechoslovak confederation in exile too, much like Yugoslavia-Greece, killed by Stalin. I just believe we Slavs, have more in common than we let ourselves believe. Westerners need protection from German imperialism, both economic and sadly, physical, considering growing pseudo-facist support in Germany. Southerners need peace and strengh, something to let them stop thinking about borders, freedom of movement. We will become one, either through EU, or on our own terms, if we try. European Federalism is growing and it'll either lead to collapse of EU or forge a federation. We should try to make our own, to get a stronger position. The clock is ticking, it may be the last straw. I will never believe in a "European man" too much people for that. But a "Slav" especially without Russians? One that considers other Slavs his brothers? One that looks upon our past of tribalism with an indulgent grin? A slav, perhaps speaking a panslavic language in addition to his own? Would that not be great? Strong, Safe from foreign interference, with our own identity? And perhaps then in EU as a negotiating partner to Germany and France, not a glorified subject? A leader perhaps? We need unity. Masaryk and Pilsudski have seen that long before any others did, too bad their visions were incompatible. Arabs try to unite, Turkic people do too. Germans have been declawed for the time. Why should we not try?
@@DehydratedDarkness NATO's intervention during the breakup of Yugoslavia was the darkest page of NATO history? More like its greatest triumph. The alliance acted decisively against an authoritarian regime committing crimes against humanity.
@@DehydratedDarkness Russia will collapse and will be a eastern European country size of Ukraine. Steppe will be belong to Native Turkics and Mongolics. Slavic yoke is ending. Have fun..
I think that in the future, we will see India, China, Russia, Iran and Turkey all vie for control of Central Asia, including in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Already, we can see a Iran-Russia Axis forming. India so far seems pretty uninterested in the region, but I think this will change. So far, despite strained relations, the West has mostly thrown in behind Turkey and Azerbaijan and both seem interested in spreading their influence over the Caspian Sea. Time will tell what happens, but we can already see Russian and Iranian influence starting to subside in the region
India, Iran🤣🤣🤣. Never. In Central Asia, if you look ugly, they call you an Indian. And Iranian Shiites, no one supports them. Only Turkуіе, Turan, all people support pan-Turkism
There was no Iranian influence in Central Asia. Only in Tajikistan, because they are Persians. There were thousands of wars between Shias and Sunnis in Central Asia. No one supports the Shiites
How exactly do you see Iranian influence subside exactly? In the caucasus iran had and still has even stronger relations with Armenia, with azerbaijan they never had much. With the central asian states Iran never had much either, except for Tajikistan which was very low as well, but they're now starting to develope rapidly. So if anything Iranian influence is just starting. Iranian influence will only disappear if the Azerbaijanis and Turkey manage to break through Armenia.
I would like to see some more detailed videos on political/economic development in Uzbekistan. If I'm not mistaken, they have the most control over the Fergana Valley, the largest population in the region, and the most control over the regions water resources.
@@alashorda2206yeah you're right, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan more step land areas, some politicians believe water agreements leads to unite like coal do to EU.
1，Wikipedia: In a sample of 54 Kazakhs and 119 Altaian Kazakhs, the main paternal lineages of Kazakhs are: C (66.7% and 59.5%), O (9% and 26%), N (2% and 0%), J (4% and 0%), R (9% and 1%) respectively CNO, typical Mongolian/ Mongoloid haplogroup (80%+) Kazakhs genetically are similar to Mongolian N dominates Urals and Yakutia O dominate Japanese Korean Chinese N and O have a common ancestor no-m214 C2 dominates Mongolian Kazakh Tungusic The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria .During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans). 2，The Mongols= East Asians, Southeast asian, Altaic people (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic speaking people), American Indians/Native Americans East Asians and Native Americans are Sinodont They carry the EDAR gene, found in ancient and modern East Asians, Southeast Asians, Nepalese and Native Americans but not common in African or European populations 3，C1 and C2 have a common ancestor C C1a Ainu people and Japanese（Jomon people） C1b Polynesia Melanesia Australian Aborigines，Asean C2：Mongolians， Turkic peoples, Siberian tribes , Tungus，Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans，Native american，Tungusic peoples Modern Turks are Turkified Anatolians The Anatolians need a new identity after losing out the Ottoman Empire. They wanted to steal the whole steppe heritage of Eurasia created by Xiongnu, Rouran, Mongols and GokTurks to make them feel great again. That's why Turkish belongs to Altaic language, but Anatonians appearance are totally different from Japanese Korean Mongolian
@@夜行者-s2x so what? Anatolian turks are still turkic people. Uzbeks aslo have some persian and arab DNA. So what? It does not make us not Turkic. We are still turkic. In 21st century every nation already mixed up and u can not find any pure nation.
@@Uzbekistanian001 1，Black South Africans speak English and carry 10%White blood so ,Are Anglo-Saxons Black people brothers? 2，The Y chromosome, like the patrilineal surname, passes down virtually unchanged from father to son such as yakuts（Turkic people），they carry haplogroup N NO haplogroup turned into two branches that are N and O (japonic-chinese-korean and….) so these two haplogroup have common anccestor few thousands years ago. The proto-Turks were East Asians/Siberians and of the Mongoloid race，whereas the Turkified Anatolian probably spews panTurk propaganda on a daily basis！What an absolute joke of a society! 3，if you start to think about what happened is that "Turkic people" or these Siberian guys came from around the East, conquered, killed some of the Anatolia males and you can figure out the rest... Made children with the women. If I remember it correctly, nowadays Anatolians carry about 5-10% of those Asian genes and the rest is Middle East or Southern Europe.
@@夜行者-s2x have u ever been to US? I’ve lived there for 4 months and I saw how different races (black, white, asian, hispanic) are united under one nation and common american culture. Same for us, we can look asian or european, it does not metter. Because we have the same traditions, culture and language. It’s not something u imagine like German Nazi nationalism. We should unite under one idea, idea of common history, traditions, culture and language! Even if they hold 1-5% Turkic DNA it is enough. Because DNA is not the main aspect of our idea. We are not like stupid aryan fascist persians or german nazis. Because it is scientifically proved that all races are equal and creating upper race is impossible. So Pan-Turkism is something different. We don’t claim that Turkic people are genetically better than other people. We just wanna unite and create United Turkic States (We call it Turan), something like European Union.
@@Uzbekistanian001 Dude this ugly short chinese rice farmer is coping hard. Seljuks were already %25-%45 East Eurasian. Modern Turks are %7-%22 except eastern black sea. So it completely depends on who you are comparing us with. Compared to Turkmens who are %25-%45 Asian we are %20-%45 their descendants....
Many people may not know, but just on onset of renaissance in Europe , likes of Cupernicus or Galileo used the methods and calculations of Ulug Beg , the turkic king and grand son of Temorlan for their astronomical and mathematical calculations. He was born in South Azerbaijan and ruled as a king in Samarkand. He built an advanced observatory in city of Maraghe , next to Tabriz, capital of South Azerbaijan. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulugh_Beg
Just imagine the scope of unconditional public support of Erdogan in Central Asia, by the way the second most popular politician on social media with 40 million followers right after Joe Biden, with estimated 60 million of followers on the Internet
Turkic people originated in Siberia(North and Northeast Asia) and spread FROM there to Central Asia and lastly to Anatolia(modern day Turkey). The vid suggests as if it was otherwise, as if Turkic people spread from modern day Turkey. Or did I get it wrong?
@Слава Україні! Maybe he didn't imply such a thing but even if he had, I don't think it has any agenda behind it. Most western(particularly new-worlder) people don't know jack about Turkic history, they automatically think of anything related with Turkey whenever they hear the word Turk.
@Слава Україні! I rewatched the video and apparently he 1- either genuinely thinks Turks "came from the west" and occupied Central Asia, totally illiterate about a subject yet aims to be taken seriously as a "politics youtuber" 2- He does indeed have a certain agenda to portray "Turkey(sic.. Ottoman Empire) invaded Central Asia" and he very well knows of his average audience(prolly from altrite european/occidental/polish circles) will gladly eat it without even making a research.
Hey, turkic languages didn’t come from modern day turkey, vice versa turks came FROM central TO Anatolia. Erdogan always describes Kazakhstan as a land of turkish’ ancestors
@@John-.-Smith so American are not Anglo Saxons DNA products it but that doesn't stopped them from being part of the English speaking world LoL TURKS are TURKIC by culture language and religion
I am not going to say non-sense stuff or suggest forming Turan Empire or anything like that. Historic Turkestan spans in a huge area from the Yakutsk in Siberia to Xinjiang in China or to Horasan region of Iran. Most of these people also identify themselves as 'Turk' and look at Turkey with a ton of sympathy. As an ally of NATO and the Western Bloc for more than 70 years, Turkey offers the most realistic opportunity to US & EU to challenge the already weakened Russian influence and possibly Chinese influence in the region. Organization of Turkic States or 'OTC'- an intergovernmental mostly cultural and economical organization might have the real chance to become a real political and military organization with some backing from NATO and the West. For instance, Turkey's influence in Azerbaijan has already hurt Russian influence in the country. If we see democratisation in Azerbaijan to some degree, we might even start discussing their NATO membership. Turkey is a very strategical member for NATO - perhaps a wild card if you look at the bigger game, China, Russia and Iran and India. Presidential elections on May 14th are perhaps the most important elections of 2023. Increased Turkish support and commitment to NATO might be just enough to guarantee a Russian defeat in Ukraine.
only a Turko-Iranic alliance will have enough population, GDP and aeres to match with giants like China, Russia or Arab League, Turkey+5 other Turkic nations are by far not enough, just like in Europe, we need both Germanic and Latin peoples to create the core of European, a single Germanic union would not work,
why no one speak how russians genocide crimean tatars? the percentage of dead Armenians is 30, the percentage of dead of the Crimean Tatars is from 30 to 70%. An interesting fact is that since the beginning of the last century, the population of the earth has increased 6 times. This means that the population of each nation has grown in times. Crimean Tatars who left in the Crimea ~ 200 thousand. until 2014. There are fewer of them now than even before the deportation. Crimean Tatars who fled from the russians expansion to Turkey have a population of 3-6 million. Any nation living with russians slowly die, this is a silent genocide. One of the reasons the russians are trying to destroy the Crimean Tatars is because they created a kurultai in an attempt to unite the Turkic peoples
Quick reminder that Armenia denies to gather their historians and open their archives in cooperation with turkish historians and historical books to proove so called "Armenian Genocide". It was in World War 1 and whole lot of people died, got out of their homes and fight against ottomans. I'm sure that there was deaths and i am sorry for that but making pure propaganda as the whole culture is funny at this point. In the end it might or might not be true but believing in any accusation without hard proof is dumb.
@@ikramyagdran4492 also the russians refuse to open the archives. There is a lot of content about the Armenian Genocide in russianyoutube and in the russian-speaking environment, every russian historical youtube channel makes content on this topic. Also, today's russian propagandists have a lot of Armenians on television. There is almost no content about how the russians themslef managed genocides, and what they have they smooth the corners and come up with excuses for the genocides that the russians did Imagine, there is no any single Russian who would have lived to old age and his fellow tribesmen would not have staged a genocide
It's all politics, there's not even consensus on Armenian genocide, but countries love to bring it up just because it's useful to use. On the other hand everyone agrees upon genocides that russians conducted on different groups like Georgians, Tatars, Ukrainians, Kazakhs...yet no one speaks about it, it's all politics
🎆 Get 25% off Blinkist premium and enjoy 2 memberships for the price of 1! Start your 7-day free trial by clicking here: www.blinkist.com/goodtimesbadtimes
If you want to support our mission, you can do so via:
📌 Patreon: www.patreon.com/GTBT
➡ Paypal: paypal.me/GoodTimesBadTime
th-cam.com/users/sgaming/emoji/7ff574f2/emoji_u2733.png
An interesting perspective by:
Turkish academician: Prof. Dr. Celal Şengör
Mongolian academician: Tomurtogoo O.
" Peoples of the Turkic race are nomads and therefore these people live togheter with
their animals and not only keep their economy afloat by grazing animals but also
by raiding their neighbours. As far as we know the first group that got contact with
these people are the Chinese, now if we look at their sources (before BC) it writes
that the "Tujue 突厥 came" in other words the Turks came. As you know this topic has
been controversial for a long time by raising the question where the
Huns(Xiongnu/Hiung-nu) of Metehan Turks?
Now when the Chinese are talking about these people they call them "Tujue 突厥" and
if we look at what they are describing like certain features that are beneficial for
themselves, for example their army for these people (Chinese).
The very first "unit of ten thousand" system (Old Turkic: tümän; Mongolian: Түмэн, tümen;
Old Chinese: 萬, tman; Turkish: tümen; Hungarian: tömény;) that applied this are these
people. They thought the Romans did but no it was used much earlier. This very concept an
army of 10 like the very words: "onbaşı(10) - yüzbaşı (100) - binbaşı (1000)" originates
from here and is very old and this concept has come to Dzjengis Khan as well and so he
used this very same organisational structure in his army.
Dzjengis Khan does not establish his capital where he was born but in Otuken - Mongolia
(the very first capital of Turkic Khaganate and Uyghur Khaganate) in other words he preserves
the Turkish tradition that this place is the capital because he sees himself as the continuation
of these people.
Look I went to Kharkhorin in Mongolia and nearby this place there is a town Karakurum
and in this town the Mongolians build a huge monument and has 3 corners. And looking at the front
side of this monument there is a giant map of an empire drawn and under this they wrote "Mongolian
nation". Then you go to the back and you can see another giant map you can read Xiongnu/Hiung-nu nation
so basically the nation that the Chinese refer these peoples as "Tujue 突厥". Then we go to the next
side and you can read "Turkish nation" and there is also an giant map of the Göktürks and when I
saw this I was shocked.
And there I was with a friend who brought me there a geologist and scholar Tomurtogoo and asked him
wait now this is your national heritage! (40km away from where the Orchoninscripties in Otuken are placed)
and further I asked him what are the Turks doing here? aren't you Mongolians!? Tomurtogoo looked at me
and explained: We do not make such a distinction, he said. When he says we are a nation, he means there,
is a group that culturally, linguistically and to a very large extent biologically hold each other
togheter because for this race the very physical attributes and characteristics are common to all of
these peoples.
They don't look like the Chinese, they don't look like the Tibetans in the south, next to them
they don't look like the Indo-Europeans. Therefore there is an Turkic race, but the Romans rightly have known
that these peoples have had great empires and are in population quite small. The nomadic economy cannot feed large
populations. After the invention of agriculture, cities emerged and large populations were fed and also have been
mixed with other populations. When the Turks went to the east they started mixing with the Chinese and when they went to
the west they started mixing with the Indo-Europeans. Therefore racial characteristics decrease but that does not
mean that there is no race anymore. "
Yes, after the collapse and disintegration of the Russian Federation and its disaggregation into its constituent republics, Yakutia (Turkic) as well as the Islamic federal states (Ingushtan, Dagestan, Chechnya) will be the inevitable objects of Turkish political ambitions, Chinese too, and so China and Turkiye will become opponents, and we ought favor Turkiye in their coming rivalry: but first we must destroy the Russian military, oust Putin, and disaggregate the criminal state into its elements. -Eric Engle
Kick Turkey out of NATO!
I From Israel I Am Khazar Jewish
Why You Don't Upload Israel In The Turkic Countries To?
Mostly Israeli Are Khazar Turks That Convert To Judaism
Ashkenazi Is Khazars!
it's not forgotten region
Greetings from Kazakhstan to our turkic brothers ❤ 🇹🇷🇹🇲🇰🇬🇰🇿🇺🇿🇦🇿
🇹🇷♥️🇰🇿🇦🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲
Aleyküm selam kardeşim. 🇹🇷♥️🇰🇿
Greeting to all Turkic people from the Republic of Bashkortostan 💙💚🤍
Assalaumagaleikum from Kazakhstan
Salam form Azerbaijan
Salam from Turkiye
love form turkmen sahra
Turkic states in Russia should declare independence from Russia. Also bring Muslim Caucasians region in Russia too
We can be stronger if we all muslim country establish One Union for our Ummah interest
Turki kardeshlarga Kazakistannan selam bolsyn
🇹🇷🇦🇿💕🇰🇿 kazaktar bizin baurlarymız
salem from tuva...yaşasın TURAN......
@@vizibilibende5194 Esenbisiz? Tuvağa salem kazaklardan 🇰🇿
Esenlikler, Kazakça da Kamal(Қамал, Камал) sözü var mı? Eğer var ise ne zamandır kullanılıyor?
@@aktaseren Kamal ol englishce `castle` ma? Evet bizde var, ne zamnnan ben bilmiyorum
I'm from central asian country, and here 80% of young people are panturkists, becoming conservative nationalists.
Which country?
salem from tuva .......long live TURAN ......
@@vizibilibende5194 мир вам тувинцам и другим тюркам Сибири
why are central asian people fight for russia than?
Are you serious? I thought you guys do not like us Anatolian Turks that much. Believe me we just want a Turkic version of EU. We have nothing to do with Russian like imperialism unlike what Iranian and Russian nationalists claim..
Greetings from the Altai Republic to our Turkic brothers and sisters. Alga Turkter
Ve aleyküm selam from Türkiye 🇹🇷 too all Turkic peoples from Hungary too siberia❤
yaşasın turan....biz birdoğanız
small linguistics note for clarity. the turkic languages originated in southern Siberia and spread south east eventually to modern day Turkey, not the other way around. the video is amazing, another great one!
Proto-Turkic speakers moved to the south west, starting probably fairly far east, maybe in the vicinity of Mongolia, or even Manchuria.
@@cacogenicist ironically most of mongolia was turkic lands while the mongolic n tungusic people started in what is now called manchuria til the Xiongnu(mostly turkic) were defeated by the Xianbei/Donghu(mostly Mongolic) and were slowly pushed out west. The Mongolic Rouran(Nirun) ruled over the Turkic tribes til the Gokturks took over and ruled over the Mongolic tribes, then the Mongolic Khitan took power and it was back and forth. (I left out the uyghur who ruled mongolia in the 8-9th century)
Completely wrong. Turkish agricultural words are unique. What crops can be cultivated in Siberia? We will not learn our own history from the irrational theories of westerners..
@@rocksody1 You never been is Siberia right?
@@tsj8726 Have you ever planted millet in the ground?
Turan forever 🐺
Just a simple question,how can one be turan and yet have an anime girl as profile picture,how can this be?
@@nomad1639 Japan is Turan
@@siyacer yes before westernization japan had some similarities to turanic peoples,and still did after westernization, but after anime!?....japan is not turan.
@@nomad1639 The genetic and linguistic connection is still there
@@siyacer Do you have any idea how irrelevant that is?...
this is just beginning, keep watching you will be shocked when you see the future position of Turkey i am a japanese, I have been living in Turkey for 7 years turkey is industrializing incredibly fast, developing technology i am comparing the current state of Turkey to the state of the people's republic of China at the beginning of the 2000s
You gotta be kidding me lol
@@nikolasmacedonites917no he is right
@@nikolasmacedonites917 ben bir Türküm çok net söylemeliyim ki bir yılda bile inanılmaz değişiyor çok hızlı bir gelişme var nasıl oluyor anlamıyorum, 2020 ile 2024 arasında inanılmaz bir fark var, çok hızlı sanayileşme var, eskiden sanayiler İstanbul'daydi devlet kredi desteği vermeye başladı, sanayiler doğu ve Karadeniz bölgelerine yayılmaya başladı.
What BS
I am a Japanese Canadian thinking of applying to an ma in Ottoman history. I’ve never taken an interest until now, turkey really looks to have an interesting future ahead. I’ve heard Turkish and Japanese have similar grammar is this true?
Fascinating how Turkey, Russia, and China are all vying for influence in the central Asian states. I hope there will be future videos detailing how this drama plays out.
there is no vying for influence. it is all Russian territory!
@@dmitry5233 How can you be so simple. How can you be so ignorant to everything just presented.
@@dmitry5233 Some time ago, half of Europe was Roman territory. And then it wasn't. Russia is getting weaker by the day...
Iran will be the last one standing
@@dmitry5233 Just like Ukraine and the Baltic states. Wake the fuck up the USSR is dead and so is Putin's Russia.
Uzbekistan together with Turkic States
albatta busiz bo'lmaydku
Tangri biz menen ☝🏻🐺
Forever 🇺🇿🫰🏼🐺
It's fascinating how lately more and more people have started talking about Central Asia
Water and resource scarcity
These are all third world countries the reason all migrants are Muslims.
Greetings to all my Turkic brothers from Tabriz, South Azerbaijan (Iran)
greetings to you brother from Anatolia!!!
Esenlikler Qardaş 🇹🇷🇦🇿🔥
Vatan forushe harumzade, az key Azeri yani Tork? Man Azeri Urumiyeh hastam khodami faghat IRANI hesab mikonam. Boro tarikh bekhun badbakht, Torko chechtangan, mage Azeria chechtangan?
Free South Azarbaijan From Israel
@@Fihtseich first time i see persian written in latin script! Wow 💕
Modern Central Asia only consists of post-Soviet "stan countries" Historical Central Asia however refers to a vast geography stretching from modern Central Asia all the way to the Mongolian-Manchurian grassland of the Far East
I think the term you’re looking for is “The Steppe”.
@@MarshallTheArtist desht-i-kipchak
@@Cuman.m285 That’s even more specific and exclusive. We’re referring to a much larger territory.
It is called Türkistan, central asia is modern deliberately russian and rest world name to cut it from TÜRK.
@@MarshallTheArtist If you think all that is steppe, you are deluded and should learn geography.
Türkiye'den azeri,kırgız,özbek,türkmen,kazak kardeşlerime selamlar hepinizi çok seviyorum
@@itisprofile Üzgünüm, Google'da hata yapmamak için arama yapmıştım Türk halkı sizi de çok çok seviyor siz bizim kardeşimizsiniz
@@itisprofile bende senin ne yazdığını anlayabiliyorum
@@itisprofile ah birde depremde bi arasaydınız türk devletleri olarak yanımızda dursaydınız çok iyi olurdu
@@itisprofile teşekkür ederiz orada yaşayan arkadaşlarımdan biliyorum hepside beni aradı iyimisin diye sordular erzak falan gönderdiler hükümeti bilmem ama benim size güvenim sonsuz
@@itisprofile teşekkürler kardeşim
Kyrgyzstan has already all the 4 types of Turkish combat drones, Bayaraktar TB 2, Akinci, Anka and Aksungur.
Enjoy it my brother 🇹🇷🇰🇬👍
Much of russia is turkish dominated, with the turkic populations booming while the ethnic russian population crashes. A broken up russia would allow for much more Turkish influence in the region.
And an end to the hideous Montreux Convention!
No parts of Russia is dominated by any of the turkic ethnicities, in the best case it's 50-50 like in Tatarstan
So
@@СергейПлугатырёвdont be delusional.
This is probably hard to see for an observer from the outside.. but it's not just on a diplomatic level that Turkey and the other Turkic states have gotten exponentially closer in the past decade.
10/15 years ago, if I looked up videos on Turkic history the Turkic comments were 90% Turkish, 5 to 10% Azerbaijani. If I looked up virdeos on different Turkic peoples, most of the comments from other Turkic people were largely Turkish comments etc etc.
Today, if you look up videos on Turkic history .. you see a diversity of comments from all over the Turkic world. From independent Turkic states in central Asia, to Ughurs to Tatars and other Turkic people from autonomous Russian federal republics etc The Turkish comments get drowned out by the amount of interest shown by other Turkic people.
Azerbaijan and Turkey have always been close. But today? Esp after Karabag? The saying "two states, one nation" which both people have used for decades is basically a reality. We are closer than ever before. Turkish language videos be it news, tv, shows, series and movies are full of Azerbaijani and also central Asian Turkic comments. My mother came to visit me recently and asked if I could put some Turkish tv show on. I did and noticed the live chat under the video was almost entirely Azerbaijani from both Azerbaijan but also Iran. And a lot of Turkmen (Iraqi, Syrian Turkmen) comments etc.
Turkic people throughout are rediscovering their own identity and their connection to each other. And I think it helps that Turkey is successful in projecting soft and hard power all over. Be it Syria/Idlib, Libya, Karabag or the destruction Turkish systems have been sowing in Ukraine against the Russians.. Turkey has been humiliating the former USSR and kinda showed that in a sense Russia is a paper tiger. Especially now with Ukraine I think even the biggest fans and assimilated pro Russian people in central Asia have taken a step back and reassessed the situation. Because not only is Russia fighting a war that it's getting humiliated in, basically everyone agrees it's not a just war. On top of that Russia loves to threaten their neighbors constantly .. like Russian parliamentarians saying that Kazakhstan isn't even a real country etc etc (basically same stuff they said about Ukraine)
Anyway, my point is. This isn't just diplomatic efforts between countries. The more there is a will from the people to connect, learn and discover about each other the more pressure there is on governments to act on it. The more politicians, teachers, diplomats, influencers, historians, sociologists etc will grow up to want to further discover and expand those bonds. Not because there is some profit but because it becomes a point of pride, ideology, love a passion.
I think this is just a start to be honest, and depending on how things go we could see a much higher level of cooperation between these states. And I truly do hope that happens. Not just because I am proud of my heritage, but because we are stronger, more prosperous and more capable together.
All nations of Central Asia are East Turks. We Eastern Turks will build one union with our West brothers which are Turkye and Azerbadjan. One Turan will be recreated! My best wiches to all Turk kind!
Turkestan - GO GO . from Uzbesitan to my all turkish brothers
Greeting to all Turkic people from the Republic of Banjornozalkistan 💛❤💚
❤️💙
You've been so prolific with the videos lately. Your efforts are much appreciated, thank you GTBT!
Naaah we need more. Not been that much
@@zccau2316 its more than one post per week rn, thats insane
You’re video’s have increased my perspective on Turkey an indescribable amount. I love your videos like this. Thanks as always, insightful video :)
Your * videos*
Greetings to all Turkish brothers/sisters from Turkiye
An important factor of course is military capabilities. It's not a secret that the Turkic Council has ambitions to be its own defense pact at one point and for that you need a varsity of good weapon systems, not limited to drones. Like the current Ukrainian govt asks the world to help them with, you need anti-air, tanks, fighter jets etc. Turkish defense industry contractors are working 24/7 on developing these difficult systems for decades now. The idea is of course first and foremost to be independent in an increasingly chaotic world, but also to be lending a handing hand for those that are in alignment. You don't have to look back too long ago, just 5 or 6 years or so, this would have been considered a fantasy. But seeing the achievements of the last years in different fields of which most won't make it to mainstream news cycles, there is a strong reason to be hopeful at least.
you know nothing about Turkish army. u think we made only drones? lol
If you look carefully behind the shadows, you will see both Israel and Saudi Arabia supporting this. The Ottomans are coming back.........with help.
to achieve this goal, Turkey has at least three adversaries: China, Iran, Russia,
@@Emilechen Iran couldn’t maintain too many issues in it’s western neighbors
@@firasajoury7813 if Turkey and Iran cooperate together to build a Turko-Iranic Union, just like th Franco-Germany co-leadership in EU,
it is more realistic and will work, but if Iran and ther Iranic peoples are excluded, it will be a geopolitical problem,
I don’t know if it was intentional, but you seem to imply that Turkey conquered westward into Central Asia. This is incorrect. Turks, who from my understanding are more or less Mongol related people, began in Central Asia and conquered the old Persian/Arab Islamic Empire and create the various empires in southwest Asia. This culminated in the Ottomans and finally Turkey. This was about 9th-10th century onward, I think. So Turkey is trying to reconnect with the Turkish homelands
Was just about to point that out. He says that Turkic people originated in anatolia and spread to Central Asia and the Siberian tundra, but it's the other way around.
It's a little more complicated than that. The creators of Turkic identity was definitely first documented somewhere between China and Russia, but the modern definition of Turkic identity is cultural and linguistic family as opposed to an ethnic one. Although you are absolutely right in how and where it originated, the main seed that kept the ideology alive originated in Western Anatolia, under the founder of latter renamed the Ottoman empire. Through the Ottomans was this spark connected and Turned into a family. Before that, it was strangers that were conquered and Turkified. It all comes down to perspectives, was it chicken or the egg? If you gave birth in three countries and abandoned your kids, would they be yours or would you have to visit them and reveal to them who they are. If you don't, they would remain a German child growing up with a single mother, never knowing she was an Ottoman.
You are ignorant. If "you dont know" just dont talk or read.
Not really mate
Turkey culture is Greek culture mixed with kurdish and armenian.
I send my greetings from Anatolia to my Turkic brothers in Central Asia. We are stronger when we stay together! 🇹🇷🇹🇲🇰🇬🇰🇿🇺🇿🇦🇿
Turkler geliyor 💪
Inchalla for the day that we can create the Turan federation in the eyes of all our enemies 🔥🔥🔥
Why Not Israel?
we are the sons of khazar jewish
Khazars Are Turkic People that convert to judaism
@@daniel_bart then greetings to you too brother 🇹🇷❤️🇮🇱
@@daniel_bart you are saying Israeli Jews aren't children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Really?
BEN OZBEG TURK MAN, TURKLAR OLGA!!!!!
This channel produce so much quality content, love it 🚀
Long live OTS 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇬🇰🇿🇭🇺
We turks are united again after 1000 years
Another important reason for the success of the Turks was their superior military technology and art of war . These nomads from the Steppes could be credited with introducing ' the age of the horse .
The Indo-Europeans were the first nomadic horse-bound peoples to conquer large swathes of Eurasia, but the Turks and Mongols ushered in an era of steppe-dominance never seen before in history. Also, the steppe-peoples were my most means technologically inferior to the settled peoples that they conquered, but they used a horde-type strategy to great effect.
Ya no. The romans greeks and virtually everyone in the Mediterranean were using large animals in warfare prior to the turks arrival in Anatolia
@Viva Espana No, it's almost agreed upon that horses, particularly, got domesticated by people in central Asia
@@tnk.2033 that’s not what we were talking about and even then i can go ahead and say its widely agreed upon domestication of horses happened in Ukraine.
@@JaKingScomez Your argument was completely irrelevant in the first place, but anyway
Love Turkiye ❤❤❤🇹🇷🇹🇷
From Indonesia
I wish nothing but the best for the people of Central Asia and Turkey, and I have some serious distrust that either Russia or China is much interested in driving economic growth in the region as opposed to just taking what they can purely for their own benefit. That said, I find old men with dreams of recreating past imperial glory (such as Erogen seems to be) seldom have the capability to deliver on the dream, and given Turkey's current economic state I don't know that their present administration is going to be able to do much in practical terms to pull this off in a way that creates tangible benefits for the people of the region.
o yea of little faith, all the things in this video and a tenfold unmentioned more is due to the planning and positioning of his excellency president Erdogan. Just hope you live long enough to see the fruits of his decades long labours.
1，Wikipedia:
In a sample of 54 Kazakhs and 119 Altaian Kazakhs, the main paternal lineages of Kazakhs are: C (66.7% and 59.5%), O (9% and 26%), N (2% and 0%), J (4% and 0%), R (9% and 1%) respectively
CNO, typical Mongolian/ Mongoloid haplogroup (80%+)
Kazakhs genetically are similar to Mongolian
N dominates Urals and Yakutia
O dominate Japanese Korean Chinese
N and O have a common ancestor no-m214
C2 dominates Mongolian Kazakh Tungusic
The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria .During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans).
2，The Mongols= East Asians, Southeast asian, Altaic people (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic speaking people), American Indians/Native Americans
East Asians and Native Americans are Sinodont
They carry the EDAR gene, found in ancient and modern East Asians, Southeast Asians, Nepalese and Native Americans but not common in African or European populations
3，C1 and C2 have a common ancestor C
C1a Ainu people and Japanese（Jomon people）
C1b Polynesia Melanesia Australian Aborigines，Asean
C2：Mongolians， Turkic peoples, Siberian tribes , Tungus，Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans，Native american，Tungusic peoples
Modern Turks are Turkified Anatolians
The Anatolians need a new identity after losing out the Ottoman Empire. They wanted to steal the whole steppe heritage of Eurasia created by Xiongnu, Rouran, Mongols and GokTurks to make them feel great again.
That's why Turkish belongs to Altaic language, but Anatonians appearance are totally different from Japanese Korean Mongolian
An important correction. Turkey did not supply Tajikistan any TB-2s due to their ongoing dispute with Uzbekistan.
Tajikistan isn’t even Turkic
@@DerKommissar86 Well yes, but that's not the reason why they were not supplied. Turkey sells drones to plenty of non-Turkic countries after all.
Tajikistan can get no support from Turkey unless they resolve their problems with Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan…
@@Hattushil Tajikistan doesn't need expensive drones from Turkey, especially after their failing in Ukraine. Iran is going to build a drone factory in Tajikistan.
@@jacobjonm0511 , Turkish drones have already proven quality world wide, Ukranians sing for TB2s for a reason… 😊
But hey, Tajikistan does not need an Iranian drone factory in their country, they can buy the same drones from Alibaba much cheaper as all parts of Iranian drones including their engines can be purchased from Alibaba… 😂
Idea of Panturkism shaped before Turkiye Republic, I think it was 1800s, Ottoman times. Turks from cross all asia are usually see Panturkism as family union.
a Turko-Iranic Union is more realistic than a single Turkic Union,
just like un European Union, we need both Germanic and Latin nations to build it,
2000 b.c rather noob
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
Seni buradada gördüğüme sevindim bizi klavyenin arkasından koruyan ve gözeten kandaşım.
The Turks certainly did not cause either the Migration Period or the Crusades.
The remnants of the Hunnic invasion were the Magyar, who clearly speak a unique and distinctly not Turkish language.
@@jensboettiger5286 The First Crusade happened due to Seljuk Invasions of Anatolia and Levant and Crusaders promised to return ex-Byzantine lands to the Byzantine Empire. The Crusades were caused by the Turks.
And the Migration Period was a domino effect started by the Xiongnu. So it is a question of if Xiongnu were Turkic or Mongolic, and the current academic consensus is that they were Turkic.
@@kmmmsyr9883 No the cause of the crusades had nothing to do with Turks(nationality) and everything to do with religion. So you can say that the spread of islam into the levant was the underlying reason. Thus the Arabs whom originally spread the religion is the cause. But it is true that the Seljuk turks ruled most of Anatolia and the levant when the first crusade happened.
@@mrchow3177 🙄 and can you tell me which Muslim people conquered such places and caused the Christians to unite against them? Turks.
We are brothers.
Birlik varsa kazanıriz.
Ozbekistandan Selamlar olsun.
aleykum selam .........turandan nasıl korkuyorlar ama :)
We are coming guys, ready or not, happy or not, Turks coming again...
FART 💨
@@lionandsun1340your HOMOSEXUAL MoM
An inevitable end! All Turkic language speaking peoples will unite, our languages will be renewed by gaining strength from each other.
Evet 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇬🇰🇿
Türklerin Tarihini cikarirsan dünyada tarih kalmaz 16 kez Allah Türklere büyük imparatorluk nasip etmisdir🇹🇷❤🇹🇷❤
3:58 what? Its exactly the other way around. Turkish languages entered from siberia and reached further and further west. Thats such a major difference, it kind of makes me worry about the research effort that went in here
The Turkic languages originated in Central Asia, on the territory of modern Mongolia and western China
@@Deus_Maximus_Extra alright, granted. Not exactly siberia but the general point holds
@@seb_5969 Truth is, there is no definitive answer to the question. Very hard to pin-point where it originated, because the Turkic ethnos includes various ancient cultures. It could be from anywhere from Eastern Europe to North Siberia.
@@b0leg23 fact of the matter is: it didnt originate in near anatolia and reached central asia from there but the other way around. Be it Kasachstan, Mongolia or even further
@@seb_5969 yeah I'm all aware, not debating that. Whoever made the video did a rookie mistake.
The Huns and Goths who conquered and ruled Europe are also likely Turkic. The Scythians, Huns, Mughals, Mamluks and many other Turkic tribes invaded and ruled South Asia for 2000+ years. A local language here, Urdu, is itself named after a Turkic word meaning "army" or "camp".
In Pakistan atleast, people still commonly use Turkic names like Khan or Beg (Bek/Bey), Chughtai (Chaghtai Khanate), Chengez (Genghis), Gujjar (Gurjaria/Georgia), Khwaja (Hodja / this maybe Turco-Persian), Bukhari (from Bukhara), Kakazai/Loi/Tarkani (Tarkhan), Popalzai (Hepthalite), Khilji (Qalach), Agha (Aga), Affandi (Effendi), Barlas, Ghazi, Taimoor (temur), Gul, Pasha, Sinan, Arsalan, Aslam (Aslan), Shahin, Amir, Zeeshan, Ata, Bahadur, Miral, Muhiddin, Gulshan, Nilofer.
Goths were Germanic. Scythians were majorily Indo-European nomads. Only the Eastern fringes were proto-Turkic dominated.
@@doyouwantthetotalwar sychtians not indo-europens
Outside of Central Asia, in the Caucasus, Azerbaijan is also a Turkic country. A majority of ethnic Azeris actually live in northwestern Iran, in the provinces of Iranian Azerbaijan.
Obviously, there's the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan to be considered here, but I do wonder about the potential for conflict in Iranian Azerbaijan as a result of pan-Turkism. There's also many Turkic minority groups in Russia, that are native to the territory of the Russian Federation (eg. Tatars, Chuvash peoples, Siberian Turks, etc.). I could see where pan-Turkism might be a thorn in the side of the Iranian and Russian governments, especially with NATO member Turkey leading the charge. I also feel some concerns about attempts to undermine the unity of NATO on the parts of governments threatened by pan-Turkism, namely by encouraging conflict between Greece and Turkey.
Back to Central Asia, Tajikistan speaks a form of the Persian language (Tajik), but there are many Turkic speakers there too.
Conflicts between Greece and Turkey is just election technique of Erdogan and his Greek counterpart. No Turk ever said to me ever about how they hated Greece. But i had lots of people saying that Greeks are just us within a different religious costume. We even have a saying in Turkey that goes like this: if two turkish people and two greek people meets, they fight. If one Turkish person and one Greek person meets, they would just sit on a sunset near the sea and drink Raki while singing songs. This explains why there will never be a greek turkish war even if there's a whole Turkic alliance even in terms like EU. Some countries want this war to happen though and would do anything to provoke it, especially Russia because it would further isolate Turkey within Nato and force it to become closer allies with Russia.
The Azeris in Iran aren't really happy about being ripped of from power in 1925 by the British. I think a conflict within depends on the behaviour of the Persians. If they continue to be that arrogant and call the Azeris cockroaches, the Turks (not Turkey Turks but in a Turkic meaning) will raise their flag again in Tehran.
@@e.h.4789 nice revisionism. Once russia gets exhausted, iran will get back all the lands that rightfully belong it all the way to dagestan. This whole shitshow started bc turkey simply invented a turkic race out of the blue and using its definition as a sword.
@@ikramyagdran4492 LOL.... You describe the irony of this world politics... Having had many turkish friends (and ladies) I can not but agree with you. We are the same. The crazy thing though is that instead of realising our common ancestry, you choose to identify with Central Asia (!!!) and Far East races (!!). To me, after having to admit that Turks are some of my best friends, the only option in order to explain what my eyes see remains human stupidity.... How can I be European, talk to you, we both see we are the same, but in the end you think your origins are for Mongolia? hahahaaaa..... Un_freaking_believable, yet true... You call the Azeris your brothers and they come from Iran. And us (your old family) enemies, or just neighbors at best.
Nowadays I see the Ukranians eat the story that Kievan Rus were not Russians but their ancestors (!!! 😆🥳 disregarding the obvious name similarity Rus=Russian!!). And they are stupid enough to believe it !!! Plus there is the other story that circulates in Kiev that Kievan Rus are not slavic, but Germanic (!!!). LOL.... Disregarding the fact that today you can just take a DNA test and see exactly who you are....
I saw the other day that stupid Turkish girl on YT, taking her DNA results that came 75% greek !!! 😝😝 And she was surprised!!!! 🤣🤣
And I wonder: WHY don't you all take a freaking DNA test to see how Asian you are?? You call youselves Turks. Are you Turkic, really???
I don't think so. Ottomans were Turks. And Seltjuks. But they vanished many years ago. You just have the name and a turkic dialect.
But why don't you try to look? Don't you want to know who you are?
As someone of Azeri heritage, I will have to admit that Azerbaijanis, while being Turkic Speakers, are of Iranic stock. The Azeris in Iran, in particular, are genetically tied to Persians and Kurds. The Azeris in the Republic of Azerbaijan are actually genetically closer to Armenians than to the original Turkic groups of Central Asia. They also carry Iranic ancestry, but to a lesser degree.
Culturally, Azeris are heavily Iranic. They celebrate the Zoroastrian holiday of Nowruz. Their foods are closest to Persian foods. Their customs are closest to those of other Iranic groups.
The name of Azeris is even Iranic. It comes from Old Persian Atar, Middle Persian Adar, and New Persian Azar. All mean "FIRE." Azerbaijan had the most Zoroastrian temples in pre-Islamic times. It was the Land of Fire. Yashasun Azerbaijan!
Hello from Uzbekistan
Salom,I'm from O'zbekistan and I hope one day All turkic people will unite and those Who live in China ,Russia,Iran,Iraq,Syria,Lebanon,Afghanistan,Tadjikistan and etc. will get their independence.
I'll hope Samarqand, Buxoro,Farghane, Tirmiz, Khworazm, Surkhandaryo join to Tajikastan 🇹🇯
@@CyrustheGreat-j7j Firstly stop marrying your cousins.
@@CyrustheGreat-j7j lol🤣,keep dreaming,When Temurid ruled central asia and middle east,He took so many Aryan slaves to Central Asia.Even iran is not really Persian,persians in Iran are not even 50% of the whole population ,iran is just a multinational persian speaking country,
I will tell about; Tabriz,Tehran,Zanjan,Ardabil,Hamedan Azerbaijani speaking provinces,Mashhad Khorosoni turks province,Gorgan Turkmans province,Shiraz Kashgate Turks province .Btw i didnt write about other Ethnicities in Iran,and are u still thinking Samarkand and Bukhara is persian😀
@@madameenmamadaliyev1727 I'm not Persian I'm TAJIK from Tajikistan. Timurid empire has nothing to do with uzbaks Timur was from mongol (barlos🇲🇳)tribe.
U uzbeks hasn't history u r mongolian with Tajik culture.
I also wish independence for Kurds living under Turkish occupation in Anatolia and independence for Armenians living in Astrakh living under Azerbaijan occupation
Just for you to know we are not the world apart. We are the core of the Eurasian continent. And Turkic Kaganate was loooooong before the ottoman empire ever established.
Typical altrite appeasing pole, and his knowledge about the "outside world" and cultures. I dont even believe he has some weird agenda to disparage Turkey. The averages there don't know jack about Turkic/Turkish history and they all perceive themselves to be experts when it comes to our country. Typical euro dunning-kruger syndrome.
Turkey has also invested in Kazakhstan's video game industry, they are expected to come out with "Steppelord" in 2033
I actually was hoping this was real.
What? I didn't heard about that
Kazakhstan has a video game industry?)
@@amansembiev8351 haha it's satire my man
@@JOGA_Wills жаль, я уже надеялся
Turkic people must unite. By the way our motherland is called Turkistan not central Asia. Learn to respect!!!
There is no south Azerbaijan/Turkmenistan
Learn to respect other countries territory!
Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home.
May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222
Well, I am a fan of Subutai a Tuvan who joined Dzjengis Khan's army when he was just 17 years old and became one of the greatest generals ever.
Genghis khan Turkic
@@alashorda2206
This is not true there is an distinction but that doesn't mean they didn't coexist as a group making up lots of dynasties. You could also have said that if the Turks weren't there Genghis khan wouldn't be Genghis khan.
@@Lawliet_____ This is true. Genghis Khan Turkic. He is from the Kiyat tribe, from the Borjigen klan. Even Genghis is a Turkic name. Khan is the rank of Turkic power. And the Khalkhas (NeoMongol) call their Khan "Hontayji". Khalkhas (NeoMongol) came to modern Mongolia in the 16th century. And Mongolia has always belonged to the Eastern Turkic Khaganate.
(Genghis Khan's real name is "Temurchin". And "Temujin" this is misspelled in Chinese. The Chinese make every name Chinese).
@@alashorda2206 yes, some used Turkic names and language but that doesn't mean they suddenly change from Mongol to a Turk (also vice versa - assimilations - intermixing) genetically but that doesn't matter because the Mongols don't make a distinction of the Turks as if to say "we're one big group" there where times when the Turks got assimilated in to Mongols and sometimes the Mongols got assimilated in to Turks.
There are mistake in the video: Turkic people spread from Central Asia to Anatolia and etc. not opposite
Average polish/eastern euro knowledge about the outside world... On par with that of muhricuhns. Not even bothering to research a subject properly, yet having plenty of opinions based on assumptions and stereotypes and wishes to be taken seriously as a politics vidmaker. The very definition of Dunning-Kruger effect...
So while Tajikistan is in central Asian, they’re an Iranian people while Azeris ar Turkic, which is part of why the Turks support Azerbaijan against Armenia. Obviously they had hatred towards them a century ago when they caused Armenians to flee after almost eradicating the nation, but it’s important to note the almost contiguous extent of Indo-Iranians from Kurdistan to South Asia versus Turkic peoples who also occupy ‘Stan’ countries. (India is Hindustan and had a much higher Muslim population before partition and considerable Persian cultural influence through trade and conquest.)
So the actual interplay between Central Asia has been even more complex as Chinese, Iranian and Indic influences (the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan for instance) and the presence of Turkic/Mongolic names in northern Indian due to Mongols and their Mughal successors.
So Turkey has a lot of competition for influence, but as the largest predominantly Turkic state, they have similar language, religion, and descended culture on their side.
armenia was stole azerbaycan lands and Turkey help to take back lands.
Turkey also has something none of those others countries dont........Turkish Hollywood (Yesilcam Sokak)!! I never cease to be shocked at how popular Turkish tv dramas on Netflix, movies and music are in United States (?!?), Latin America, Africa- no need to mention Arab countries of course. Iranian and Indian teenagers watching Turkish romance series or listening to Turkish rap music will more of have an impact than you think.
Armenia has been around for thousands of years. So I’m sure they conquered land, but the Turks tried to kill them off, so whatever beef Azeris have with them pales in comparison…
India was ruled by Turkic dynasties for 1000 years (Babur dynasty or Mughals being the masters). What Indian think as iersusk is indeed Turkic. Iran itself was ruled by Turkic dynasties until WW1 when English brought Fars people to power in order to have free hand in exploiting Iran oil by English ….
@@kayacenk4164 Everything was stole somewhere down the line.
Excellent report as expected! Thank you
We all Turks need to join together, no matter what others think or say. Otherwise we gonna lose everything, where is Turkestan now? Look what is going on in Eastern Turkestan!
And too CRIMEA 😭
I’m glad there is a rebound of the various Turkic People. At minimum, I’m seeing more culture, history, and customs being shared on TH-cam. Thank you for sharing!
long live Turkic Union ............... we won first war in karabağ region...........
Tajikistan 🇹🇯 isn’t a Turkic country. They speak Persian.
the Turkish Universities teach that ***ALL*** languages are derived from Turkish
also Turkey is the source of good looks and super tasty onions
@@SD-SD-SD Pseudo-history
@@SD-SD-SDLiterally no one says that, stop projecting what you imagine people think and instead read about them instead.
I spoort turkic union from Azerbaijan 👌🏻
Long live Turkic union, peoples, languages and countries❤❤❤
Nationalism is stupid
@@sb_dunk no its not
@@daniel_bart yes it is
If Ottoman Empire would conquered Central Asia rather than Arabia, it would be like USA today.
The threat of the Organisation of Turkish States is perhaps even greater for Beijing than it is for Moscow, when you take into consideration the Uyghur who are a turkic people and the 'East Turkestan' independence movement in the region. A strong Turkic union could lead to a similar situation as we saw with Pakistan/Afghanistan and the funding of terrorist organisations in the country. The stronger the union becomes, the greater the risk of Uyghur seccesion.
even all Turkic narions and ethnics are untied, their GDP and industrial capacity all together is still lower than a single province of Guangdong, so their threat is limited,
the time of nomad empire is kver, excpet Turkey, no othet Turkic country is industrial and economic great power, how can they be really strong?
That's probably true, according to a CGTN documentary released in 2021, the former director of the Xinjiang Education Department deliberately changed the 2003, 2009 Uyghur langugage text books for primary school and middle school to promote Pan-Turkism, Pan-Islamism, reglious extremism and ethnic animosity against Han Chinese, featuring Turkic and Islamic historic figures prominently while making very little reference to PRC, Chinese history or culture. Those text books were used for 13 years starting from 2004. So half a generation of Uyghurs that studied in Uyghur language schools would've been affected.
NOT CENTRAL ASIA! IT IS TURKISTAN!
I wonder how this will play out for the Uyghur people currently undergoing a genocide at the hands of Beijing. I'm talking about their hopes for the genocide to end and for the PRC to be held accountable, but also their aspirations for statehood and their place in the arrangement of Central Asia as envisioned by Erdogan in Ankara. I know that China has been able to buy the silence of Central Asian states via the Belt and Road scheme, but I wonder just how much Pan-Turkic ideology at the grassroots and state levels might push back against them. Especially with emerging de facto independent Turkic states like Tatarstan and Bashkortostan facing the impending collapse of the Russian Federation.
Uygur's are supported by the people. Goverments will change their stance.
foolish point, should check more accuracy info about Uyghur people status from source which not basing western country who are lying.
Caspian Report slaps hard,
awesome to see his presence near yours!
Turkish propaganda united
'As a result this centuries-long presense of English peoples in British Isles contributed to a cultural and linguistic expansion, with American language extending far beyond the border of the modern United States, and spilling over into the British territories, even reaching Europe.' Lol.
If you're wondering what the heck have I written, this is just like what the author says about Turkic languages coming from Turkey to the Central Asia, while the truth is completely opposite. I think this all stems from the old confusion of adjectives Turkish and Turkic, which then, if you add few other misconceptions and ignorance, creates... this.
This
He is a pole, what more do you expect? To properly research about the "outside world"?
@@HatredForMankind huh? Who’s a pole? You’re confusing
@@xyeBNot you, the channel owner. You are just a weeaboo, of unknown ethnicity(probably with a history of colonial subjecthood under Imperial Japanese occupation, I assume, but I could be wrong)
@@xyeBThe channel owner. Not you
All we are Turkic countries. Hello Turan empire from Uzbekistan
From the beginning the Turks were noted for their superior military qualities, which seem to have lain mainly in their use of mounted bowmen and the nomadic speed of their cavalry. From this time on the Caliphs relied to an increasing extent on Turkish troops and commanders, to the detriment of the older cultured peoples in Islam, the Arabs and the Persians. The progressive militarization of the regime increased their strength. By the eleventh century the Turks were entering the world of Islam, not only as individuals recruited by capture or purchase, but by the migration of whole tribes of free nomadic Turks still organized in their own traditional way.
Lewis, B. (2002) Arabs in history. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.160
3:57 that's just blatantly wrong
Turkic people originated in Mongolia/ Siberia, as they migrated West, they mingled with local ethnicities.
So Turks in Turkey are not the original Turkic people.
So to claim Turkic people spread beyond the Turkish republic, is like claiming English people spread beyond the American Republic
Turkic people expanded into Mongolia. They started their invasion of India and Persia around 400CE. Demographics favored them.
@@John-.-Smith Nothing abnormal in that. Ottoman's were a mix of Oghuz and Tatar/Kipchak's. It was actually a confederation with remnants of Golden Hord.
There are 2 or 3 factories of Turkish Bayraktars in Uzbekistan already.
☝🏻🐺😎⏳⏳⏳⏳
Thank you for this information. As a Turk, the information is correct, but it is clear that Central Asia still hesitates to show their will under the hegemony of China and Russia. While China penetrates Central Asia for its underground resources, which are more important to him, Russia's eastern security passes through the security of Central Asia. In this direction, I believe that Central Asia should be more stable in order for the Turkish union to have as constructive and solid foundations as the European Union. While Turkey is dealing with all geographical problems, it will do everything in its power for the geopolitics of Central Asia.
even athe 6 Turkic nations united, is is not enough to be a great global power, unless they are able to be untied with the other Iranic people too,
so the two leaders show be Tuekry and Iran together,
just like the Germano-Latin axes in European Union,
Don't support your vision, I'm from Kazakhstan and i think we have better development way than turkish union, wrong way for us
@@daulz6905 You should be an exception among Qazaqtar. You can even be a non-Kazakh Kazakhstani. If you are really a Qazaq, you know that most of Kazakh people are aware of the situation. They share Turkic and panturkist vision of their forefathers like Shäkerim, Alixan Bökeixanov, Mağjan Jumabaiuly, Mustafa Şoqai. You should be one of those Orysquls who are brainwashed. You do not represent majority of Kazakh people. Words above are your individual ideas.
We are Turkic people and we are not European, not Arabic, not someone else. We are Turks and we proud of it.
Ne Mutlu Türküm Diyene!
Turks in Turkey arent even Turks lol, theyre a mix of different conquered peoples.
Theres nothing more delusional than a white looking Turk proudly believing he’s turkic along with his central asian “brothers”. Deep inside they know they are descendants of en$laved people.
Its a fake artificial country, nothing more.
Then live in Central Asia not in Europe.
@Nadid Linchestein There's no such concept like every nation must live in where they are originally comes from. It's plain stupid even thinking that but you don't seem so bright anyway, do you?
@@NadidLinchestein Turkia is West Asia not Europe
@@NadidLinchestein by your logic Americans should return to Europe? Is this make sense you moron???
Thank you for reporting on the Central Asian Region and Turkey's plan to turn it into its sphere of influence. As security and trade alliances are being realigned and reformed, the tentacles of deceased Empires reach into the present for their hoped-for resurrection. The French, Russians, and US fought long costly wars to subjugate Afghanistan for their exploits and transport routes for gas and oil pipelines from Central Asia. Each abandoned their plans. We are living in extremely dangerous times. Much hangs in the balance for the billions of people who inhabit these regions.
Billlions?
I don’t think it’s correct to put Tajikistan into the group of Turkic nations since they are Persian in ethnicity.
I'm sure that Turkey's visions of empire will work out really well for them. Good luck Turkey.
Especially with the +80% inflation.
@@FarsightAE inflation goes and comes, strength and development long lasting.
@@sluchy7962 Turkeys inflation is entirely self made by erdogans fanatical stubborness to follow islamic economic policy rather than ecpnomic policy in the real world.
Excellent report. Keep these ones on Türkiye coming.
Excellent report! ✨Your efforts are much appreciated, thank you 👍
The Tajiks are a Persian speaking Iranian ethnic group not Turkic.
Tajiks Are Persianized By Iranians
Iranian People Are Arabic
Iranians Have 95% Arab Dna
@@daniel_bart 😂😂 Sure
Well theres still more then 1.5 million Turkic peoples in Tajikistan. Also located in Turkestan. So kinda Turco-Persian state
It’s a Turko Persian state not just Persian
Iran has many ethnic groups such as Persians, Turks, Kurds, Lers, Azeri, Baluch, Gilak, Arabs, etc., and most Iranians do not have Arab roots, and most of the Turkic countries today, such as Uzbekistan and the Republic of Azerbaijan, have Iranian roots because in the past And in empires like the Achaemenids, they were part of Iran
And your statement about the DNA of Iranians is baseless (although most Iranian ethnic groups have similar DNA)
I realized that the people who prepared the video did not fully understand Turkish nationalism. We, the Turks, were a single state when we were at war with China thousands of years ago. Afterwards, we spread around the world as families (clans) because the conditions required it. Turks are now what they were then. We are brothers and Muslims. If you want to know the Turks, research Kürşat's story. "I brought you Kürşat's grudge." :)
Correction: The Turks didn’t spread into Central Asia. They spread out. The Turks are native to Northeast Kazakhstan.
as a turkish girl our original birth place not kazakhstan but north eastern china near manchuria and inner mongolia
@@xxxxxx-rg6qr No one cares who you are, both of you in this thread need to show sources.
That’s arguable, as linguistic and archaeological evidence points more towards an Altai mountain hypothesis. Yet, that still is a pretty sound evidence for a Manchurian origin, although it is less accepted.
Historically, Turks had control over on China, they're not native to there, origin is probably from between northern central Asia and northern Kazakhstan
It's a nice sentiment to feel a form of connection to other, similar cultures. However, Pan-Xism has been tried numerous times up to the present day and have never worked. It has always ended in some sort of conflict, often with a devastating and completely unnecessary loss in human life. Do not repeat the mistakes of the past, learn from it instead.
Be under no illusion, Turkey is using Pan-Turkism as a path to hegemony. Just like Prussia with Pan-Germanism, Serbia and Russia with Pan-Slavism, Iraq with Pan-Arabism, and so on.
The path for Prussian hegemony in a unified Germany dates back to the time of Bismarck in the late 1800's. Even today, I recommend you ask a Bavarian what he/she thinks about having a Prussian telling them what to do. "Saupreiss" (Prussian Pig/Swine) is a traditional derogatory term in Bavaria.
Serbia using Pan-Slavism as her path to hegemony in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later named Yugoslavia. We all know what happened to Yugoslavia.
Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist party likewise wanted to create a unified Arab state with Iraq as hegemon, using Pan-Arabism and Arab nationalism as a pretext for it's path to hegemony. Another project doomed to crash and burn.
Pan-Turkism cannot, and will not end any differently. Once most Turkic nations and populations realize that Turkey is really just using them to establish a regional hegemony, with them as subjects/colonies or client states, then discontent and rebellion will ensue.
O we know that TURKYE is trying to dominate other TURKC COUNTRY and PEOPLE but what choice do we have when you have enemies like Russia China and Iran TURKS with whom we have the same Language Culture and History + RELIGION is the best candidate but I agree with you about that rest
From Siberian to Balkan Turkic nations the way is TURAN!
If Turk nation united in 15 year their will be more powerful in economy compare with China US or EU
China GDP is larger than Russia+India+Japan's GDP all added together, it is quite hard to surpass,
@@Emilechenbut military and geographically will be much stronger 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇬🇰🇿☪️💖☝🏻💪🏻
Might be just me as a slav but whenever I hear pan-turkism I immediately remember pan-slavism and what am absolute catastrophy that has turned into
What catastrophe? If we throw away the negatively charged idea of Pan-Slavism as "Russian Pan-Slavism" it was a huge success, compared to pan-nationalism movements. Scandinavianism was dead before it was even a thing, Pan-Germanicism brought us Hitler, Pan-Arabism had more states that have all fallen (rather violently usually) aside from UAE, the only sucessful pan-nationalist state to this day. Pan-Turkism was never realised in the slightest. Meanwhile we had Yugoslavism that got buried by Germans (They have literally sworn to dismantle Yugoslavia, also the darkest page of NATO history), Czechoslovakia, a wildly sucessful initiative dismantled by politicans without the general opinion's consent (most were against dissolving) which happened in a very elegant way anyways. Polish-Czechoslovak confederation didn't get to be a thing becuase first Germans destroyed them as independent states, then Soviets demanded to stop the works on it.
We should give it a try, just without Russians so we'd have no warmongering maniacs inside. A united Slavia would solve balkan problems by giving Serbs a stronger state, which would curb their expansionism, Czechs couldnnot care about anything in the world as they do, Slovaks could stay in their mountains, Poles would get 90% ofnthe Commonwealth back and be happy with it, Ukrainians would be safe from Russia and Belarusians could be free.
@@DehydratedDarkness I wouldn't exactly call any of that functional. The balkans is a pile of nations that hate each other more then anyone else, same with eastern slavs. Might have something to do with people not wanting to be under Serbias grip. Even in the West, the potential of a czechoslovak-polish state died the second polish artillery guns started to bomb cities as a prelude to the invasion which later got pulverized by the czechoslovak army. Same with the later invasion when czechoslovakia got occupied as Poland saw it as a opportunity to get more land as a Germany’s friend. Same with '68 when polish troops came to crush the czechoslovak uprising. There are precisely 2 nations which have any possibility of joining together, lasting and not immidiately trying to kill each other, the Czechs and Slovaks and even that has failed. Sure, we do like each other and we were one of the very few peaceful breakups of countries in modern history but we still broke. It is true that the politicians divided the country without a referendum but the people were asked and the answers was either apathy or agreement with the breakup. The Czechs wanted to ditch the Slovaks to get into the eu faster while Slovaks were absolutely and completely fed up with the iron grip rule of Prague and how they were little more then a overglorified colony. That's why, even if you asked today, in either of the countries the answer to reunification is a resounding No
@@Brother_Rony Last polls I have checked had 54% Don't know 30-something yes for reunifcation in Czechis, the more apathetic part. The matter of Polish-Czechoslovak border in particular is problematic, but the truth is it was the Czechoslovaks that struck first and genocided the border populace, in fear of the referendums being in favor of Poland. Then Poland seized the very same territories back (without agreement with Hitler, they just walked in in the general turmoil), then Slovakia has seized them again. They are In Czechia and Slovakia today anyways. So much blood spilled over a bit of land. Wouldn't a union state help? The politicans were negotianing the Polish-Czechoslovak confederation in exile too, much like Yugoslavia-Greece, killed by Stalin. I just believe we Slavs, have more in common than we let ourselves believe. Westerners need protection from German imperialism, both economic and sadly, physical, considering growing pseudo-facist support in Germany. Southerners need peace and strengh, something to let them stop thinking about borders, freedom of movement. We will become one, either through EU, or on our own terms, if we try. European Federalism is growing and it'll either lead to collapse of EU or forge a federation. We should try to make our own, to get a stronger position. The clock is ticking, it may be the last straw. I will never believe in a "European man" too much people for that. But a "Slav" especially without Russians? One that considers other Slavs his brothers? One that looks upon our past of tribalism with an indulgent grin? A slav, perhaps speaking a panslavic language in addition to his own? Would that not be great? Strong, Safe from foreign interference, with our own identity? And perhaps then in EU as a negotiating partner to Germany and France, not a glorified subject? A leader perhaps? We need unity. Masaryk and Pilsudski have seen that long before any others did, too bad their visions were incompatible.
Arabs try to unite, Turkic people do too. Germans have been declawed for the time. Why should we not try?
@@DehydratedDarkness NATO's intervention during the breakup of Yugoslavia was the darkest page of NATO history? More like its greatest triumph. The alliance acted decisively against an authoritarian regime committing crimes against humanity.
@@DehydratedDarkness Russia will collapse and will be a eastern European country size of Ukraine. Steppe will be belong to Native Turkics and Mongolics. Slavic yoke is ending. Have fun..
I think that in the future, we will see India, China, Russia, Iran and Turkey all vie for control of Central Asia, including in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Already, we can see a Iran-Russia Axis forming. India so far seems pretty uninterested in the region, but I think this will change. So far, despite strained relations, the West has mostly thrown in behind Turkey and Azerbaijan and both seem interested in spreading their influence over the Caspian Sea. Time will tell what happens, but we can already see Russian and Iranian influence starting to subside in the region
India, Iran🤣🤣🤣. Never. In Central Asia, if you look ugly, they call you an Indian. And Iranian Shiites, no one supports them. Only Turkуіе, Turan, all people support pan-Turkism
There was no Iranian influence in Central Asia. Only in Tajikistan, because they are Persians. There were thousands of wars between Shias and Sunnis in Central Asia. No one supports the Shiites
How exactly do you see Iranian influence subside exactly?
In the caucasus iran had and still has even stronger relations with Armenia, with azerbaijan they never had much. With the central asian states Iran never had much either, except for Tajikistan which was very low as well, but they're now starting to develope rapidly. So if anything Iranian influence is just starting.
Iranian influence will only disappear if the Azerbaijanis and Turkey manage to break through Armenia.
India do have interest, but no way during the geo constraint
I would like to see some more detailed videos on political/economic development in Uzbekistan. If I'm not mistaken, they have the most control over the Fergana Valley, the largest population in the region, and the most control over the regions water resources.
No. All water resources come from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and China. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan depend on them
@@alashorda2206 yeah, I can see that since those countries have the mountains and could build more reservoirs
@@jacobwwarner yes. But according to the agreement, they are obliged to send water
@@alashorda2206yeah you're right, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan more step land areas, some politicians believe water agreements leads to unite like coal do to EU.
I am from Uzbekistan and I support pan-turkism. Turan Union is coming… 🇺🇿🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇰🇿🇰🇬🤘🏼
1，Wikipedia:
In a sample of 54 Kazakhs and 119 Altaian Kazakhs, the main paternal lineages of Kazakhs are: C (66.7% and 59.5%), O (9% and 26%), N (2% and 0%), J (4% and 0%), R (9% and 1%) respectively
CNO, typical Mongolian/ Mongoloid haplogroup (80%+)
Kazakhs genetically are similar to Mongolian
N dominates Urals and Yakutia
O dominate Japanese Korean Chinese
N and O have a common ancestor no-m214
C2 dominates Mongolian Kazakh Tungusic
The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria .During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans).
2，The Mongols= East Asians, Southeast asian, Altaic people (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic speaking people), American Indians/Native Americans
East Asians and Native Americans are Sinodont
They carry the EDAR gene, found in ancient and modern East Asians, Southeast Asians, Nepalese and Native Americans but not common in African or European populations
3，C1 and C2 have a common ancestor C
C1a Ainu people and Japanese（Jomon people）
C1b Polynesia Melanesia Australian Aborigines，Asean
C2：Mongolians， Turkic peoples, Siberian tribes , Tungus，Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans，Native american，Tungusic peoples
Modern Turks are Turkified Anatolians
The Anatolians need a new identity after losing out the Ottoman Empire. They wanted to steal the whole steppe heritage of Eurasia created by Xiongnu, Rouran, Mongols and GokTurks to make them feel great again.
That's why Turkish belongs to Altaic language, but Anatonians appearance are totally different from Japanese Korean Mongolian
@@夜行者-s2x so what? Anatolian turks are still turkic people. Uzbeks aslo have some persian and arab DNA. So what? It does not make us not Turkic. We are still turkic. In 21st century every nation already mixed up and u can not find any pure nation.
@@Uzbekistanian001 1，Black South Africans speak English and carry 10%White blood
so ,Are Anglo-Saxons Black people brothers?
2，The Y chromosome, like the patrilineal surname, passes down virtually unchanged from father to son
such as yakuts（Turkic people），they carry haplogroup N
NO haplogroup turned into two branches that are N and O (japonic-chinese-korean and….) so these two haplogroup have common anccestor few thousands years ago.
The proto-Turks were East Asians/Siberians and of the Mongoloid race，whereas the Turkified Anatolian probably spews panTurk propaganda on a daily basis！What an absolute joke of a society!
3，if you start to think about what happened is that "Turkic people" or these Siberian guys came from around the East, conquered, killed some of the Anatolia males and you can figure out the rest... Made children with the women.
If I remember it correctly, nowadays Anatolians carry about 5-10% of those Asian genes and the rest is Middle East or Southern Europe.
@@夜行者-s2x have u ever been to US? I’ve lived there for 4 months and I saw how different races (black, white, asian, hispanic) are united under one nation and common american culture. Same for us, we can look asian or european, it does not metter. Because we have the same traditions, culture and language. It’s not something u imagine like German Nazi nationalism. We should unite under one idea, idea of common history, traditions, culture and language! Even if they hold 1-5% Turkic DNA it is enough. Because DNA is not the main aspect of our idea. We are not like stupid aryan fascist persians or german nazis. Because it is scientifically proved that all races are equal and creating upper race is impossible. So Pan-Turkism is something different. We don’t claim that Turkic people are genetically better than other people. We just wanna unite and create United Turkic States (We call it Turan), something like European Union.
@@Uzbekistanian001 Dude this ugly short chinese rice farmer is coping hard. Seljuks were already %25-%45 East Eurasian. Modern Turks are %7-%22 except eastern black sea. So it completely depends on who you are comparing us with. Compared to Turkmens who are %25-%45 Asian we are %20-%45 their descendants....
Profesjonalny materiał jak zawsze, kom dla zasięgu
kurwa
Great content :)
Many people may not know, but just on onset of renaissance in Europe , likes of Cupernicus or Galileo used the methods and calculations of Ulug Beg , the turkic king and grand son of Temorlan for their astronomical and mathematical calculations.
He was born in South Azerbaijan and ruled as a king in Samarkand. He built an advanced observatory in city of Maraghe , next to Tabriz, capital of South Azerbaijan.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulugh_Beg
hahahahaha, hilarious comment 😂😂😂
@@gent55a Komik olan sizsiniz.Sizi kandırmışlar.Batıda aklı başında olan bir kaç bilim adamı gerçeği biliyor.
Just imagine the scope of unconditional public support of Erdogan in Central Asia, by the way the second most popular politician on social media with 40 million followers right after Joe Biden, with estimated 60 million of followers on the Internet
Turkic people originated in Siberia(North and Northeast Asia) and spread FROM there to Central Asia and lastly to Anatolia(modern day Turkey). The vid suggests as if it was otherwise, as if Turkic people spread from modern day Turkey. Or did I get it wrong?
Probably from Tuva region
@Слава Україні! Maybe he didn't imply such a thing but even if he had, I don't think it has any agenda behind it. Most western(particularly new-worlder) people don't know jack about Turkic history, they automatically think of anything related with Turkey whenever they hear the word Turk.
@Слава Україні! I rewatched the video and apparently he
1- either genuinely thinks Turks "came from the west" and occupied Central Asia, totally illiterate about a subject yet aims to be taken seriously as a "politics youtuber"
2- He does indeed have a certain agenda to portray "Turkey(sic.. Ottoman Empire) invaded Central Asia" and he very well knows of his average audience(prolly from altrite european/occidental/polish circles) will gladly eat it without even making a research.
Hey, turkic languages didn’t come from modern day turkey, vice versa turks came FROM central TO Anatolia. Erdogan always describes Kazakhstan as a land of turkish’ ancestors
@@John-.-Smithwell that is not true they are TURKIC
@@John-.-Smith so American are not Anglo Saxons DNA products it but that doesn't stopped them from being part of the English speaking world LoL
TURKS are TURKIC by culture language and religion
Turkey doesn't have to rule, Turkic countries of Asia are free willingly cooperating together with Turkey.
I am not going to say non-sense stuff or suggest forming Turan Empire or anything like that. Historic Turkestan spans in a huge area from the Yakutsk in Siberia to Xinjiang in China or to Horasan region of Iran. Most of these people also identify themselves as 'Turk' and look at Turkey with a ton of sympathy. As an ally of NATO and the Western Bloc for more than 70 years, Turkey offers the most realistic opportunity to US & EU to challenge the already weakened Russian influence and possibly Chinese influence in the region. Organization of Turkic States or 'OTC'- an intergovernmental mostly cultural and economical organization might have the real chance to become a real political and military organization with some backing from NATO and the West. For instance, Turkey's influence in Azerbaijan has already hurt Russian influence in the country. If we see democratisation in Azerbaijan to some degree, we might even start discussing their NATO membership. Turkey is a very strategical member for NATO - perhaps a wild card if you look at the bigger game, China, Russia and Iran and India. Presidential elections on May 14th are perhaps the most important elections of 2023. Increased Turkish support and commitment to NATO might be just enough to guarantee a Russian defeat in Ukraine.
Well since NATO is trying to stir up Turkey with their support to PKK/YPG terror groups, We will see more and more anti-NATO sentiments from people.
only a Turko-Iranic alliance will have enough population, GDP and aeres to match with giants like China, Russia or Arab League,
Turkey+5 other Turkic nations are by far not enough,
just like in Europe, we need both Germanic and Latin peoples to create the core of European, a single Germanic union would not work,
this is by far the most accurate and synthetized documentary i watched about pan-turkism ! congratulation !
yok be bunlar bisi bilmio , azeri kanali bu. tr tarihi bilmeden sagdan soldan okudugunu current event takip edip millete satio.
In orientalism and old literature the now days central Asia was called Türkistan and Khorasan for thousand years!
Meanwhile Balkan countries: Here we go again
I hope President Erdogan declares Turkey as a Caliphate state in 2023! This will be awesome for all the muslims!
Tajikistin is not Turkish.they are iranian
why no one speak how russians genocide crimean tatars? the percentage of dead Armenians is 30, the percentage of dead of the Crimean Tatars is from 30 to 70%.
An interesting fact is that since the beginning of the last century, the population of the earth has increased 6 times. This means that the population of each nation has grown in times. Crimean Tatars who left in the Crimea ~ 200 thousand. until 2014. There are fewer of them now than even before the deportation. Crimean Tatars who fled from the russians expansion to Turkey have a population of 3-6 million. Any nation living with russians slowly die, this is a silent genocide. One of the reasons the russians are trying to destroy the Crimean Tatars is because they created a kurultai in an attempt to unite the Turkic peoples
Reminds the same situation with the Circassia's people
Quick reminder that Armenia denies to gather their historians and open their archives in cooperation with turkish historians and historical books to proove so called "Armenian Genocide". It was in World War 1 and whole lot of people died, got out of their homes and fight against ottomans. I'm sure that there was deaths and i am sorry for that but making pure propaganda as the whole culture is funny at this point.
In the end it might or might not be true but believing in any accusation without hard proof is dumb.
@@ikramyagdran4492 also the russians refuse to open the archives. There is a lot of content about the Armenian Genocide in russianyoutube and in the russian-speaking environment, every russian historical youtube channel makes content on this topic. Also, today's russian propagandists have a lot of Armenians on television. There is almost no content about how the russians themslef managed genocides, and what they have they smooth the corners and come up with excuses for the genocides that the russians did
Imagine, there is no any single Russian who would have lived to old age and his fellow tribesmen would not have staged a genocide
It's all politics, there's not even consensus on Armenian genocide, but countries love to bring it up just because it's useful to use. On the other hand everyone agrees upon genocides that russians conducted on different groups like Georgians, Tatars, Ukrainians, Kazakhs...yet no one speaks about it, it's all politics
Free Azerbaijanis from iran occupation
Free KURDS from turkey 🦃 occupation
@@lionandsun1340FREE AZERBAIJAN for Iranian 🐫occupation
Turkey’s power is much less than its ambitions
We will see remember those people created EMPIRE that battle crusades mongols I'ven the king of the vampires dracula