Fischer Projection Stereochemistry How to find R and S configurations FAST: Chirality Vid 6

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 132

  • @alimouzannar2980
    @alimouzannar2980 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    If there's an H on the side of the chiral center, find R and S normally and the opposite is the answer. if H is on the top/bottom and there's no other hydrogen on the sides, find R and S normally and that's your answer.

    • @wissspam5140
      @wissspam5140 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you stranger

    • @nikirahimi2797
      @nikirahimi2797 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes exactly, came here to find this comment. I don't know why she chooses to make it this complicated lol

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's a great way of looking at it!
      Yes! H on the side is forward so you must reverse as you do when #4 is forward
      H up or down means it's in the back and so you're good to go

  • @elizabethye6955
    @elizabethye6955 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Thank you so much! I was wasting so much time trying to visualize this all in 3D. This makes it so much faster now! :)

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Glad it helped you!

  • @almamusvosvi4250
    @almamusvosvi4250 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Wow! You make O Chem so easy to understand! You have the best O Chem videos out there! Thank you so much!!!!!!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're very welcome, so glad to hear how much it helped you!

  • @josephfatoye6293
    @josephfatoye6293 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you so much for this, years after and its still a blessing to me
    God bless you

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much!

  • @101Borgle
    @101Borgle 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your videos are so helpful even 8 years in!!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you like them and that they are standing the test of time!

  • @kaushikumarihami1982
    @kaushikumarihami1982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The most amazing teacher I have ever seen!!! Born talent!! I wish you good luck for everything for your future!!!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much, and I'm happy my resources are helping you!

  • @nawalzaidi6172
    @nawalzaidi6172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love your videos. Now, I understand this well because of them. I still watch them over and over because they're just fun to see how simple this is if it's explained the way you always do. 6:26 This is a Carbon attached to who cares :). Thank you!!

  • @Punjabispitta
    @Punjabispitta 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You the real mvp for these orgo videos. Thank you so much! :)

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're very welcome!

  • @madhumithaayyappan5277
    @madhumithaayyappan5277 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    seriously, your videos are really lovely, i cant stop loving ochem!!

    • @athenas4324
      @athenas4324 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are incredible

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your kind words, I'm so glad to help you!

  • @srishtiparihar960
    @srishtiparihar960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much mam for these videos ,earlier I wasn't able to understand this topic but now I saw your whole playlist and I understood each and everything completely . thanks again ,
    your all video are so nice
    it cleared all my concepts on chirality .

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad the video helped! You are very much welcome!

  • @sethmatteson8326
    @sethmatteson8326 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You made this become so much easier! Thank you for your help! I'm thankful God led me to this video.

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome!

  • @christinanoble8760
    @christinanoble8760 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You are like patrickjmt but for chemistry and I love your videos.

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much!

  • @ninadbhole3271
    @ninadbhole3271 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    u made it soo easy.....
    I was having a lot of confusion earlier...
    u are amazing...

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  ปีที่แล้ว

      Happy to help!

  • @sarahusman2376
    @sarahusman2376 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At 2:08, why does sulfur outrank the three oxygens (i.e. theC double bond O and the OH)? I thought it was based on atomic mass so 16*3 = 48 would be heavier than the Sulfur molar mass of 32

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      You have to look at the individual atom and its atomic number. Sulfur has a higher atomic number than Oxygen and outranks it regardless of what else is further on the chain

  • @anmolkundlas6132
    @anmolkundlas6132 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    love these vids! literally saving me in my summer orgo class!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So happy to help!

  • @rashmikiranpandit8962
    @rashmikiranpandit8962 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    the thing i was hunting since days... got it in this video!!!... 🙌😊😊

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome!

  • @aleksandrakacperczyk3338
    @aleksandrakacperczyk3338 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do we have to use the swap method (3:20) if #4 comes out of the page? Wouldn't it be correct if we just reversed the configuration? I don't get it... :

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      you don't have to, but it helps to keep things organized. You're right though

  • @صفاالشامي-ز2ذ
    @صفاالشامي-ز2ذ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why we did swaps min7:29? The H is out so why we did not track 123 and take the opposite of R which is S

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is just my method for determining R/S configurations in Fischer projections in the LEAST amount of time. You may find something else works for you! My method is to first swap the lowest priority group to the back of the molecule by placing it in either the up or down position and then to make a second swap for a total even number of swaps. This is so we don't have to reverse the direction of the configuration.

  • @amandamendoza2776
    @amandamendoza2776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When #4 is on the side, can you not trace 1-3 and do the opposite answer? Or do you have to do swap method for fischer projections? Because you did examples for newman projections with #4 in the front & doing the opposite answer rather than the swap method. I just want to make sure the same rules apply. Thank you :)

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, that is an excellent observation. The same rules would apply, and your method would work as well. Trace groups 1-3 when #4 is on the side of the Fischer projection and then change your answer to the opposite configuration.

  • @jonathangarcia9699
    @jonathangarcia9699 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love visualizing the molecule as opposed to doing the whole swap thing. You get FAST at it once you do a light load of practice problems.

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome! Do what works best for you :)

    • @nirajbhavar6086
      @nirajbhavar6086 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      What if the substituents are A,B,C & D . Then we can't use the r and s. So how to differentiate which molecules are enantiomers, diasteromers,etc. Please make a video regarding such type of problemS.

  • @breayonnapearson2596
    @breayonnapearson2596 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 2:25, why does your amine have lower priority then oxygen? Nitrogen come before oxygen?

    • @nicksahloby4097
      @nicksahloby4097 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes, Br first, then O, then N. it goes by atomic number (highest to lowest)

    • @rittenbrake1613
      @rittenbrake1613 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      the N is compared to C , not O

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Take a look at my other video on how to rank atoms. Higher atomic number gets higher priority and so oxygen outranks nitrogen which outranks carbon and so on

  • @kaylakruse2040
    @kaylakruse2040 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Question: I thought that most amino acids have the absolute configuration of "S" while cysteine is supposed to be the exception, having "R"? However, you list cysteine as having an S configuration.

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      at which point in the video? they can exist as R and S, it's just a question of knowing which one exists in the human system.

  • @anbarasusamraj7737
    @anbarasusamraj7737 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    now only i came to know clearly compound with two chiral centers thanks mam.

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it helped

  • @clara4117
    @clara4117 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much!! Your videos are so helpful!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're very welcome, so happy to help!

  • @nishantchavan3668
    @nishantchavan3668 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb explanation...U saved a life....

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Happy to help!

  • @ariannapero9873
    @ariannapero9873 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a question: in the last example, what would happen if we had Cl also in the first chiral centre, at right? In this way there would be a plan of symmetry in the molecule, so, would it been still chiral? Thank you so much, your videos are so helpful!!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're so welcome! Unfortunately, I don't offer tutoring over social media. For help with questions like this and more, I recommend joining the organic chemistry study hall. Details: leah4sci.com/join or contact me through my website leah4sci.com/contact/

    • @ariannapero9873
      @ariannapero9873 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Leah4sci thank you!

  • @jean-michelmatthijssen5334
    @jean-michelmatthijssen5334 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    With Fisher I find it easier to imagine the Fisher projection as 3D and than either see the above group as in the back (just rotate your screen with the top to the right) or with the right group in the back (means that the left group is shifted to the right in its Fisher projection.)
    Using either of these methods you can instantly draw an arrow with group 4 on the top (first method), the right (second method). Or inversed (group 4 is in the front) on the bottom (first method) or left (second method).

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you've found a method that works for you!

  • @vanessa.payano
    @vanessa.payano 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a reason why we use the swap method instead of treating it the same way as R vs S when the 4th group is forward? I used the other method you taught and got the same answer, will this always be the case?

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you found the configuration (either R or S) and then changed it to the other one, that would also work. That is similar to doing the swap method with only 1 swap. With any odd number of swaps, we must always change the configuration. I sometimes suggest doing an even number of swaps, only because then we don't have to change the configuration.
      I hope that makes sense! For further help, make sure to see my full tutorial on Chirality and Stereochemistry at Leah4sci.com/chirality

  • @rishita9638
    @rishita9638 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u so much.. the whole series helped a alot

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are very welcome! I'm so glad it helped

  • @siddharthnaidu8381
    @siddharthnaidu8381 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ur the greatest of all time

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, thank you!

  • @31rifahnoorchowdhury19
    @31rifahnoorchowdhury19 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the multiple chiral center example doesnt it break the carbon skeleton if we use swap method on it . Can we break the carbon skeleton ? Will it not alter its original stereochemical position ?

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We're not actually breaking bonds within the carbon skeleton. We are simply rearranging/swapping positions of priority for the purpose of assigning a configuration to the chiral center. Think of the swap method as a tool for determining configuration, not as a mechanism or a method of breaking or reforming bonds.

  • @yumiogawa8824
    @yumiogawa8824 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:52 make me confused because back mean, i thought OH(2) but Br(1) becomes to (4)

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In this example, we chose to make two swaps because an even number of swaps means that the configuration at the chiral center will not change. We want to maintain the chirality, so that we read the molecule correctly as either R or S. So the first swap was (1) with (4). And the second swap was (2) with (3).

  • @Phobos221B
    @Phobos221B 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Amino acid in the beginning is Cysteine

  • @rachelchristian6721
    @rachelchristian6721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the first molecule in this video is a cysteine :)

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're right!

  • @Ashbenzyl
    @Ashbenzyl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:30 cysteine

  • @vyshnavveenus4945
    @vyshnavveenus4945 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tht was Really Helpful....😊

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it

  • @okdikshita
    @okdikshita 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent... I loved you didn't prefer wedge and dash

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it!

  • @chemistryworld2293
    @chemistryworld2293 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    good to explain ,,, i realy like it

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it

  • @jessicacoyle1999
    @jessicacoyle1999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi I was watching this video and for the Fischer projection atoms you start by putting H at the top of the atom in the first molecule but at the bottom in the next one which creates two molecules one which is S and one which is R how do you get around this as it is really confusing for me

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry to hear that you are confused. In a Fischer projection, the spine of the molecule is really on a ‘dash’ notation. Both the group that’s going up and the group that’s going down are ‘into the page.’ That means, if we can make sure #4 (the lowest priority group) is in the up OR down position of the Fischer projection, then we’re good to go and do NOT need to use the swap method to determine configuration.

  • @nasilelesimataa5034
    @nasilelesimataa5034 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is awesome

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it, thanks for watching!

  • @arieldroger5291
    @arieldroger5291 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    So easy, thank you!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're welcome!

  • @mariamrajput1443
    @mariamrajput1443 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanku u make it easy for me

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're so welcome, I'm happy to help!

  • @mansoorfawsiya6689
    @mansoorfawsiya6689 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hii madam in last example of this vedio what was the exact answer this one R or S configuration

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The chiral carbon at the top of the molecule had an S configuration, and the chiral carbon at the bottom had an R configuration.

  • @dickgrayson3601
    @dickgrayson3601 7 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Fischer projection was named after you wasn't it 😂

  • @sayantantalukdar9883
    @sayantantalukdar9883 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If no. 4 is at the horizontal R becomes S and S becomes R
    Simple as that

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing!

  • @anyamohanad4059
    @anyamohanad4059 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are saving lifes

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aww thanks!

  • @hadeerrashad5486
    @hadeerrashad5486 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much!!!!!!!!

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome!

  • @sayafmuhammed7667
    @sayafmuhammed7667 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're SO welcome!

  • @AD-wg8ik
    @AD-wg8ik 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really don’t understand the swap method. Why can’t you just switch the configuration. Seems like extra steps

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This method for determining R/S configurations might not work for everyone, but if you’d like to learn more, watch my previous video at leah4sci.com/swap-method

  • @mansoorfawsiya6689
    @mansoorfawsiya6689 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dont you have conversion vedios

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The free videos are what I do as I have time. For more help with this topic, feel free to contact me through my website: leah4sci.com/contact

  • @bhaveshpadhiyar6751
    @bhaveshpadhiyar6751 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @kabozachannel3512
    @kabozachannel3512 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is better lectures

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you like it!

  • @vu6676
    @vu6676 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This swapping thing is a bit confusing

    • @vu6676
      @vu6676 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      nvm. I understand what is happening. I realized that I didn't really need to do the swapping thing 3 times at the end. As long as we remember our swapping technique, we can assume the other configuration after swapping once.

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it cleared up for you!

  • @BilalAhmad-sr5uw
    @BilalAhmad-sr5uw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OK good

  • @nanothefruit8063
    @nanothefruit8063 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    She's god

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I just checked, looks like I'm still human!

    • @nanothefruit8063
      @nanothefruit8063 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Leah4sci Thank you for replying

    • @extravago7868
      @extravago7868 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      God is a woman

  • @shwethahs370
    @shwethahs370 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi

  • @fadilahmohd8903
    @fadilahmohd8903 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh I am confused now

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh no! I'm sorry to hear that; feel free to contact me through my website: leah4sci.com/contact

    • @fadilahmohd8903
      @fadilahmohd8903 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Leah4sci Thanks a lot. I'll do that

  • @Tenelocan
    @Tenelocan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    gooated ahh video

    • @Leah4sci
      @Leah4sci  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you liked it!

  • @kylitrixgames4980
    @kylitrixgames4980 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    cysteine

  • @rahulburma2677
    @rahulburma2677 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    She said a naughty word...Thats a dislike for me