These guys are mad because they bought Asian Brands thinking it wa s such a smart buy...and we're in 2024 and American Brands are killing the competition. That interior is GORGEOUSSSSSSS
@@steveterrel8944 But people who buy the Terrain, or any small crossover like the Terrain, drive it on the road..? They don't usually race them or tow a huge load? Is 175HP not good enough for a small SUV?
It's the same 1.5 engine that outsold the 2.0 when they had that as an option. Plenty of get up and go and not nearly as thirsty. If the 2.0 engine is a must, You can opt for the 2024 Buick Envision. Even then you won't feel much of a difference though
1.5 Turbo with CVT mimics the Honda CRV drivetrain. Seems to be pretty mainstream now. It’s not for me, but it must meet fuel economy/power/pricing goals.
GM reserves that engine for Buick and Cadillac. They need to either make it an option on the Denali and/or AT4 trim. I will not buy the Envision because it is made in China. No Chinese made autos, and the Cadillac model isn’t the best design either. This is the problem when you have too many divisions.
That engine is a bad joke. Not offering any other engine options kills this. And I wouldn't be surprised if OTD prices are HIGHER compared to Buick Envision with the MUCH better 2.0 T engine.
I feel like cars are becoming more and more superficial. Not everyone wants huge screens, piano black plastic, and off road trims that do nothing except alter the design to look more rugged. I would like the car to drive well, and that means I don’t want a 1.5t with a CVT. I also want it to be somewhat reliable. Bravo to GM if they managed to bring competitive driving dynamics to the Terrain
Y'all should've bought the 2.0t engine when it was available on the last generation Terrain/Equinox, but you the consumer didn't buy it in large numbers and it was canceled. So, put your money where your mouth is or shut up.
@@JT-fq2blSo nobody bought that model and GM thinks this will sell? They're out of touch. Garbage models new traverse having issues. The new Buick models with those anemic engines are also crap.
Weak engine. I like the look as GMC did nail the design! I have a 2011 with the I4 and it can tow 1500lbs. the V6 it used to have can do 3500lbs. They need to be around the 3500lb mark. It's why I never upgraded to the newer Terrains. That and the cost for less didn't make sense. To answer your question Alex, I prefer less screen and more engine personally!
@@ATH_Berkshire Not really. They can get the MPG when matching the power to weight ratio and proper gearing. 250HP would be the ideal power for this car. By the time you spec the Terrain out to a higher trim or options your in 4Runner territory and it can tow more. Again, GMC nailed the design as it look like an updated version of the 2011 but the power could be better for the money your spending on these things.
How is 175 HP gonna compete with the Rav4, which has over 200 HP, and is going to be redesigned next year with the Camry Hybrid's powertrain, taking it to 225 HP? I like the redesign, but this is lipstick on a pig. The vehicle has no heart. No power and no hybrid =
@@naveenthemachine I have the 2011 terrain with the I4 and it had 184hp and can the tow the same. So this engine is less then impressive from what I have already. The v6 these used to have had more HP and tow numbers too.
@@naveenthemachine the first generation Terrain had way more power with both the 2.4 and 3.6 engines. This little 1.5 is a joke. Honda's 1.5 make more power.
@@satwatchers I test drove a Civic yesterday. It did not feel cheap, plastic, or like a tin car, but I’m sure the new terrain doesn’t feel like that either. I can certainly compare the two if their HP numbers are similar and the terrain has less horsepower and 200lbs more weight than a civic. I’m just saying this thing is gonna be hella slow and not at all fun to drive, but that’s not the point of it. It’s supposed to be an appliance not a long term car and that’s okay, I was just stating the obvious.
I agree; especially for the upper end Denali and AT4 trims. That figure is pathetic, and that engine doesn't belong in a vehicle that will likely go out the door at a price north of $45,000. These over-priced turtles won't sell.
you only see the ones you see. gmc terrains and acadias of a certain model range have terrible engines. my sister in law bought a terrain and had to have the engine rebuilt weeks after the bought it.
A lot of those failure could be avoided if people would just change their oil on time and check the level a couple times between changes. @@ModestNeophyte
This has the weakest engine in its class. What a joke of a powertrain. Honda's own 1.5 turbo makes more power for less money. All of the Terrain's competition makes more power. The old first generation's 2.4 and 3.6 engines, made more power. Seems like GM is going backwards again.
Alex! I love your ABG channel. #1 is your American English is incredible for me to learn from. #2 your effectiveness and efficiency timing for audiences is perfect. Thank you for your dedicating time for delivery value info for automobiles consumers. Good luck! By the way, GM or Toyota don't see you as a chief of public affairs for their products in NA, they are not pay attentions on their most value customers at all
Thanks for the video. Do you know if this model will have the same fuel pump module thats been failing in most of the 2016-2023 models? There's actually a current class action suit against GM for the Terrains and Acadias that have the fuel pump module failure issue. It happens on most GM vehicles from what I've seen (Trucks, SUVs, etc.). There's even tow truck haulers on YT here that do videos where they talk about the number of GM vehicles they tow every month to the dealer for this exact issue. Until I know they've resolved the issue, I wont be buying a GM product. For them (General Motors) to let it go on for so long, stranding their customers is pretty pathetic. I currently own a GMC Sierra but its a 2007. Thanks again!
175hp 1.5 turbo is incredibly weak across the entire lineup. CR-V has 190hp 1.5 turbo and the 204hp hybrid options. All for what will probably be pretty close in price to what these are. The SLE/SLT equivalent trims (Elevation or whatever) should have had the 1.5 turbo with the AT4 and Denali getting a better powertrain than that. Coming in with 175hp approaching $40k is just kind of sad. Not to mention will get much worse fuel economy than something like a similarly priced CR-V hybrid while ALSO having much less power to boot. That CR-V will also likely have way better resale down the road. Good effort on the exterior/interior for most part from GMC here, they just forgot to offer a compelling drivetrain.
@@christianx2kEvery different engine option offered costs money for engineering, certification and marketing. Given that the majority of buyers are opting for the model with the best MPG I suspect GM doesn’t think a higher output option would increase profitability.
Way too little power for something this big. I can’t even imagine how lethargic the AT4 trim will be with bigger tires, etc. The interior is basic and could honestly be a Ford or whatever as all interiors are so boring that just involve huge screens and little thought. Pretty positive automotive interior designers are no longer used on vehicles.
If you want more power, there's the Acadia and Yukon, but GM only offering a small gas engine when most of the competition is offering hybrids is a letdown.
If you are just going to putt around in town and never get on an interstate highway and only keep this thing during its warranty period or lease it then well…never mind this is a total fail with that little pea shooter under the hood. There is a long list of better candidates in this segment
Am I the only one that thinks that fog lights are utterly useless in modern cars with LED headlights? I'd rather MUCH rather have the fog lights be properly positioned cornering lights to help at low speed driving.
Fog lights are not useless with LED headlights - not sure why you think that. The light pattern is totally different than driving lights. Doesn't matter if it's LED or not.
@@ShowMeWhatINeedToKnow they make almost no difference. You need warm/yellow lights to really make a difference. Had them on a mustang, Model Y, Santa Fe, etc and they make very little difference. Better than nothing but I'd much rather have them pointed outward to use as cornering lights in day to day driving. Driving in the fog is not very common for the average American. But I definitely know the average American drives at night more often where cornering lights can be useful
@@markdavis1505 sorta cost prohibitive on a mainstream car. I was just saying if I could choose one I'd go cornering lights every day of the week. They still can sort work for fog lights. I like how Lexus implements them
@@ayushmalpeddi2793 - Then your LED fog lights sucked. Most OEM fog lights are virtually worthless. Mine are awesome though - on my BMW - cast the light nice and wide. I love them. Helps me see pedestrians in town.
The only thing dumber than a rising beltline is the higher/smaller rear glass that it creates on the tailgate. No Super Cruise? I really hope that front passenger seat folds down flat.
Oops! Maybe in your head it might break down every 10,000, but JD Power has people that study these matters and use real methodology to form conclusions. JD Power had The Equinox and Terrain 1 and 2 for reliability in their segment in 2023. You might check top ten vehicles for reliability.
To me, it is not differentiated enough from the Equinox from the side view, & I don't like the front design at all; it's too much, & too busy. Interior-wise, I prefer the Chevy as well; I don't like the big tablet screen. I don't think there's enough here to make it a compelling buy vs. the Equinox.
Surprised GMC would offer a cloth interior. Would have guessed at least synthetic leather for the base trims. Think the blacked out Elevation looks the best. The chrome bits just seems a little tacky. The vertical chrome piece reminds me of a Mitsubishi Eclipse cross - not good.
@@BrandonG8ManAre we sure Android auto/Carplay included in this redesign? Can't help but think GM has plans to remove it from their ICE vehicles eventually. Auto manufacturers desperately want your data. And most people happy to give away their data and privacy these days.
@@BrandonG8Man I just went back and re-read GM’s official announcement. They removed it from EVs and confirmed plans to phase it out of their entire lineup. So, I still expect it to go away. Granted, I wouldn’t currently consider a GM with how unfriendly they’ve been to their customers the last few years (collecting and selling data without consent, changing the rewards program for their credit cards, attempting to force onstar subscriptions, etc)
It's bigger than both of those (especially the rear legroom), that's one reason. But I think there are better choices out there if you want something bigger than the RAV4 or CC.
I'd prefer the front to be smaller and easier to see over, but it definitely looks better resolved than the previous generation. Matte chrome is much better than the previous gen. Don't care for the AT4 at all. The interior is quite nice. The only thing really missing is a hybrid and I can't help but think that will be a challenge for sales as time moves on. Would help the car to feel peppier too.
Really like the buttons along the bottom of touch-tone-screen (Tablet). Also like Vertical Tablet below dashboard top cover, like vertical tablet on top of floor console
I have a 2024 Terrain Denali which I love. However, I hate the new tablet display on the 2025. GM has given up actually designing attractive dashes and is just sticking in huge computer screens instead. 2025 Buicks and Cadillacs also have terribly over sized screens. At least on the 2025 Chevy Equinox the digital screens are molded into the dash and not just stuck in place.
Took a Uber the other day. 2012 Ford Escape Hybrid. IT HAD 779,000 MILES ON THE DASH I SWEAR TO EVERYONES GOD...These comments aren't from Americans. Other Channels are praising this Model. You guys are horrible lol
Alex I’ve watch your reviews a long time,and because I know you have your stuff together,please answer one question for me,I have a 2022 crv with awd is this the same system that Acura has? I know your a busy guy,so thanks for your time.HD PAYNE.
Put the diesel and add a hybrid on every midsize truck and suv, add a rear locker, and there's your recipe for huge sales. You've created a go anywhere torque monster that's great on fuel.
Wider yes but not longer according to GM (unless the 2026 Denali Trim has different dimension specs compared to the 2025 Elevation which loses 2 inches of length compared to all 2024 Terrains trims).
It is a beautiful car until you raise the hood. There is nothing there!!! Come on General, put a motor in it. How about that 300 HP. V-6 ? I had one in an Acadia, great motor!!!
Oh. If that’s the best looking version of the Terrain .. that’s more of a shame than a modest powered drivetrain. How does GMC justify such an unattractive vehicle for the Denali product line? This is no time to test the Aztec concept ..
Oh, stop the "BS.” It doesn’t matter what color your car is for you to be comfortable in a hot climate. Answer this question. Who is more comfortable in a hot climate, a white person or a black person?
Alex this is the third review i watched on the new terrain you were the only one to find the spare tire or even mention it. Thanks for going the extra mile!!
They could have done something different with the instrument cluster on these new GM vehicles. Along with the Canyon and Acadia, it looks like the cluster was an afterthought. You have a big hole and they just stuck a tablet in there. I would rather see the entire opening with a digital cluster integrated into the opening.
That engine looks tiny. They certainly have room to put in something bigger. It’s almost as if they weren’t planning on having a gas model at all so they didn’t put any thought into the powertrain.
I think gm really missed the ball when it comes to the engine under the hood. I think they did a great job with the redesign but that power figure just isn’t enough.
It still looks bad from the side. Especially on the lower trim. Squat is what comes to mind. I just hope for shoppers it doesn’t feel horribly cheap inside like last gen.
We have a 2019 GMC Terrain Denali with the 2.0 t, we absolutely love it. I have to say I like the looks of the new Terrain. I’m not sure about a silver roof on black, the different coloured A pillars really throw me off, maybe in person it looks better. Screen orientation is cool and a nice interior. As for double screens in vehicles, I’m still getting use to 2 screens. I drove a 2005 Kia spectra up till last year, putting over 330 000 kms on it, then we purchase the Terrain used
Love the new look of the vehicle overall. Never liked the low nose on the current model. The 25 cures that. I'll be in the market in late 25 for something new. The AT4 looks like a great choice with 20" wheels!!
I don't mind the light over the front wheel well, but the back one is useless, and I think confusing to drivers next to them. Having it built into the rear light is better IMHO. Oh, and I'm guessing GMC went with blinking brake lights - again.
Alex, thanks for another comprehensive review. You do the best job addressing what is important. Extra credit for showing the sunglasses holder. I use mine all the time in my last 4 vehicles. One of my favorite features and so many cars are doing away with them. Again I appreciate your detail oriented reviews.
No hybrid and under 200 hp? how are the US brands still in business?
Protectionism
They should shine them tires if it’s gonna be in a showroom, but otherwise a good looking car
These guys are mad because they bought Asian Brands thinking it wa s such a smart buy...and we're in 2024 and American Brands are killing the competition. That interior is GORGEOUSSSSSSS
Need a smaller engine if your going to be driving and playing with that damn tablet
175hp? Too much weight to be engaging.
203lb-ft is decent though and should make it feel quite peppy given how (likely) low in the RPM range it'll be available.
Agree. They need a higher hp option.
@@steveterrel8944 But people who buy the Terrain, or any small crossover like the Terrain, drive it on the road..? They don't usually race them or tow a huge load? Is 175HP not good enough for a small SUV?
It's the same 1.5 engine that outsold the 2.0 when they had that as an option. Plenty of get up and go and not nearly as thirsty. If the 2.0 engine is a must, You can opt for the 2024 Buick Envision. Even then you won't feel much of a difference though
@@futurepaver2039 yes it is but people want numbers that give them bragging rights and think they’ll pay these prices for them.
Why does gmc refuse to give us quality drivetrains?
1.5 Turbo with CVT mimics the Honda CRV drivetrain. Seems to be pretty mainstream now. It’s not for me, but it must meet fuel economy/power/pricing goals.
Because shareholders are demanding growing dividends every qtr constantly
@@larryaugsburger8452 It makes less power than the Honda.
GM reserves that engine for Buick and Cadillac. They need to either make it an option on the Denali and/or AT4 trim. I will not buy the Envision because it is made in China. No Chinese made autos, and the Cadillac model isn’t the best design either. This is the problem when you have too many divisions.
That’s why they encourage you to buy their LS crate engines, so you can LS swap the Terrain
That engine is a bad joke. Not offering any other engine options kills this. And I wouldn't be surprised if OTD prices are HIGHER compared to Buick Envision with the MUCH better 2.0 T engine.
I feel like cars are becoming more and more superficial. Not everyone wants huge screens, piano black plastic, and off road trims that do nothing except alter the design to look more rugged. I would like the car to drive well, and that means I don’t want a 1.5t with a CVT. I also want it to be somewhat reliable. Bravo to GM if they managed to bring competitive driving dynamics to the Terrain
I wish more cars went the route of the new Toyota Land cruiser. No gimmicks, just rugged, simple design
@@pinkisforpimpsSure, and be prepared to pay $60k for a bare bones 1958 edition. Bare bones but the price is anything but.
Denali and AT4 REQUIRE The 2.0L turbocharged engine. 1.5L isnt going to cut it, especially with Denali buyers 😮
The only concern for me is that small engine. How would this drive with 4 adults and a packed trunk.
Why? It's a turbo engine. You get all your torque and more of it at low rpm compared naturally aspirated engines at max rpm.
There aren’t even options. People want hybrids.
It’s grossly underpowered, hard pass. Junk engine, junk brand.
Y'all should've bought the 2.0t engine when it was available on the last generation Terrain/Equinox, but you the consumer didn't buy it in large numbers and it was canceled. So, put your money where your mouth is or shut up.
@@JT-fq2blSo nobody bought that model and GM thinks this will sell? They're out of touch. Garbage models new traverse having issues. The new Buick models with those anemic engines are also crap.
Looks nice but the low horsepower and standard CVT is disappointing
Imagine this with a V6. Now that’s something I’d get. Love the look
Won't happen unfortunately. The larger Acadia desperately needs 2 additional cylinders, but they will remain with the 2.7L Turbo.
@@zteburner5882 federal fleet average of 54mpg mandated or else. Blame uncle Sam
Weak engine. I like the look as GMC did nail the design! I have a 2011 with the I4 and it can tow 1500lbs. the V6 it used to have can do 3500lbs. They need to be around the 3500lb mark. It's why I never upgraded to the newer Terrains. That and the cost for less didn't make sense.
To answer your question Alex, I prefer less screen and more engine personally!
More engine equals less MPG. For the vast majority of buyers in this segment MPG is more of a concern than towing capacity.
@@ATH_Berkshire Not really. They can get the MPG when matching the power to weight ratio and proper gearing. 250HP would be the ideal power for this car. By the time you spec the Terrain out to a higher trim or options your in 4Runner territory and it can tow more.
Again, GMC nailed the design as it look like an updated version of the 2011 but the power could be better for the money your spending on these things.
GM are doing some great things of late...this is not one of them.
How is 175 HP gonna compete with the Rav4, which has over 200 HP, and is going to be redesigned next year with the Camry Hybrid's powertrain, taking it to 225 HP?
I like the redesign, but this is lipstick on a pig.
The vehicle has no heart. No power and no hybrid =
The terrain has a turbo so a lot more low end torque than a rav4
@@naveenthemachine I have the 2011 terrain with the I4 and it had 184hp and can the tow the same. So this engine is less then impressive from what I have already. The v6 these used to have had more HP and tow numbers too.
@@naveenthemachine the first generation Terrain had way more power with both the 2.4 and 3.6 engines. This little 1.5 is a joke. Honda's 1.5 make more power.
200hp is now standard on 2025 CIVICS. 175 is nothing
Fair point. Sad. The new Terrain and Equinox are otherwise great.
No it’s not!!! Get your facts right!!! You can’t compare a Civic to a Terrain. A Civic is also a cheap plastic and tin car.
@@satwatchers I test drove a Civic yesterday. It did not feel cheap, plastic, or like a tin car, but I’m sure the new terrain doesn’t feel like that either. I can certainly compare the two if their HP numbers are similar and the terrain has less horsepower and 200lbs more weight than a civic. I’m just saying this thing is gonna be hella slow and not at all fun to drive, but that’s not the point of it. It’s supposed to be an appliance not a long term car and that’s okay, I was just stating the obvious.
Only a 175hp option?! No thanks, that thing's going to be gutless!
I agree; especially for the upper end Denali and AT4 trims. That figure is pathetic, and that engine doesn't belong in a vehicle that will likely go out the door at a price north of $45,000. These over-priced turtles won't sell.
Less HP than a VW Tiguan, which is already barely getting by
Plus a standard CVT…
@@MarkRVillano Rental Fleet Queens.
201ft/lbs at low rpms. Are you doing pedal to the floor all the time?
I'm 40...and I look around America and I see EVERY MODEL YEAR OF GMC ON THE ROADS ...So why are the comments saying GMC isn't reliable??????
you only see the ones you see. gmc terrains and acadias of a certain model range have terrible engines. my sister in law bought a terrain and had to have the engine rebuilt weeks after the bought it.
A lot of those failure could be avoided if people would just change their oil on time and check the level a couple times between changes. @@ModestNeophyte
Another ugly huge vertical infotainment screen. The solution to the question nobody asked.
I had a 2019 terrain Denali I leased it for four years. Couldn’t wait to give it back.!!! it had the turning circle of an oil tanker.
This has the weakest engine in its class. What a joke of a powertrain. Honda's own 1.5 turbo makes more power for less money. All of the Terrain's competition makes more power. The old first generation's 2.4 and 3.6 engines, made more power. Seems like GM is going backwards again.
Alex! I love your ABG channel. #1 is your American English is incredible for me to learn from. #2 your effectiveness and efficiency timing for audiences is perfect. Thank you for your dedicating time for delivery value info for automobiles consumers. Good luck! By the way, GM or Toyota don't see you as a chief of public affairs for their products in NA, they are not pay attentions on their most value customers at all
Thanks for the video. Do you know if this model will have the same fuel pump module thats been failing in most of the 2016-2023 models? There's actually a current class action suit against GM for the Terrains and Acadias that have the fuel pump module failure issue. It happens on most GM vehicles from what I've seen (Trucks, SUVs, etc.). There's even tow truck haulers on YT here that do videos where they talk about the number of GM vehicles they tow every month to the dealer for this exact issue. Until I know they've resolved the issue, I wont be buying a GM product. For them (General Motors) to let it go on for so long, stranding their customers is pretty pathetic. I currently own a GMC Sierra but its a 2007. Thanks again!
I was hoping that this would get added to my list of options. But, 175HP?! What a joke. This is essentially a worse Ford Explorer.
finally the redesign terrain deserved for so long but 175hp engine for this behemoth? What is GMC smoking?
Insufficient horsepower for the expected pricing. Tiny engine. What is GM thinking. Get a RAV4, CX5, Seltos, or just about anything else.
I’d take anything over the rav4
175hp 1.5 turbo is incredibly weak across the entire lineup. CR-V has 190hp 1.5 turbo and the 204hp hybrid options. All for what will probably be pretty close in price to what these are.
The SLE/SLT equivalent trims (Elevation or whatever) should have had the 1.5 turbo with the AT4 and Denali getting a better powertrain than that. Coming in with 175hp approaching $40k is just kind of sad. Not to mention will get much worse fuel economy than something like a similarly priced CR-V hybrid while ALSO having much less power to boot. That CR-V will also likely have way better resale down the road. Good effort on the exterior/interior for most part from GMC here, they just forgot to offer a compelling drivetrain.
Going to be DOA because of the underpowered engine. This should have at least 250hp+ minimum.
Agreed
@@dynamicremakes5592 i dont understand why it doesnt at least have the envision or ct4’s engine
@@christianx2kEvery different engine option offered costs money for engineering, certification and marketing. Given that the majority of buyers are opting for the model with the best MPG I suspect GM doesn’t think a higher output option would increase profitability.
There is…a lot going on in the front end…
Way too little power for something this big. I can’t even imagine how lethargic the AT4 trim will be with bigger tires, etc. The interior is basic and could honestly be a Ford or whatever as all interiors are so boring that just involve huge screens and little thought. Pretty positive automotive interior designers are no longer used on vehicles.
If you want more power, there's the Acadia and Yukon, but GM only offering a small gas engine when most of the competition is offering hybrids is a letdown.
If you are just going to putt around in town and never get on an interstate highway and only keep this thing during its warranty period or lease it then well…never mind this is a total fail with that little pea shooter under the hood. There is a long list of better candidates in this segment
Expensive, low HP engine, still no Hybrid.
Who cares?!
Am I the only one that thinks that fog lights are utterly useless in modern cars with LED headlights? I'd rather MUCH rather have the fog lights be properly positioned cornering lights to help at low speed driving.
Fog lights are not useless with LED headlights - not sure why you think that. The light pattern is totally different than driving lights. Doesn't matter if it's LED or not.
@@ShowMeWhatINeedToKnow they make almost no difference. You need warm/yellow lights to really make a difference. Had them on a mustang, Model Y, Santa Fe, etc and they make very little difference. Better than nothing but I'd much rather have them pointed outward to use as cornering lights in day to day driving. Driving in the fog is not very common for the average American. But I definitely know the average American drives at night more often where cornering lights can be useful
Why not both??
@@markdavis1505 sorta cost prohibitive on a mainstream car. I was just saying if I could choose one I'd go cornering lights every day of the week. They still can sort work for fog lights. I like how Lexus implements them
@@ayushmalpeddi2793 - Then your LED fog lights sucked. Most OEM fog lights are virtually worthless. Mine are awesome though - on my BMW - cast the light nice and wide. I love them. Helps me see pedestrians in town.
I checked, went out, open the hood. There was no reliability.😂
Its too bad that powertrain is a deal breaker... that interior is amazing
I have bought GMC products for 35 years. I like the GMC Terrain but no thanks with that underpowered engine.
That's GMs. Speed. A great redesign with a crappy leftover engine. A 3.0v6 would have been awesome.
Better than ever? CVT Underpowered 1.5 turbo. Yeah definitely not better than ever.
The only thing dumber than a rising beltline is the higher/smaller rear glass that it creates on the tailgate. No Super Cruise? I really hope that front passenger seat folds down flat.
Pay attention to door noise when he closes the front drivers door.
A denali with only 175HP? Lemme guess $50k too🤣🤣🤣 and we all know it'll breakdown everything 10,000 miles
Oops! Maybe in your head it might break down every 10,000, but JD Power has people that study these matters and use real methodology to form conclusions. JD Power had The Equinox and Terrain 1 and 2 for reliability in their segment in 2023. You might check top ten vehicles for reliability.
JD power 😂
To me, it is not differentiated enough from the Equinox from the side view, & I don't like the front design at all; it's too much, & too busy. Interior-wise, I prefer the Chevy as well; I don't like the big tablet screen. I don't think there's enough here to make it a compelling buy vs. the Equinox.
“Not differentiated enough” is the entire history of GM 😮
Well if you haven’t realized, all GM does is reskin a Chevy and mark it up 💀
Surprised GMC would offer a cloth interior. Would have guessed at least synthetic leather for the base trims. Think the blacked out Elevation looks the best. The chrome bits just seems a little tacky. The vertical chrome piece reminds me of a Mitsubishi Eclipse cross - not good.
Where is the engine upgrade? The HEV or PHEV version. Many folks still don’t want an EV…
11:09 Did I hear Apple CarPlay and Android Auto mapping? Is GM bringing them back to their lineup?
They never removed it from ICE models. It’s only their EV’s that don’t have it.
@@BrandonG8ManAre we sure Android auto/Carplay included in this redesign? Can't help but think GM has plans to remove it from their ICE vehicles eventually. Auto manufacturers desperately want your data. And most people happy to give away their data and privacy these days.
@@BrandonG8Man I just went back and re-read GM’s official announcement. They removed it from EVs and confirmed plans to phase it out of their entire lineup. So, I still expect it to go away. Granted, I wouldn’t currently consider a GM with how unfriendly they’ve been to their customers the last few years (collecting and selling data without consent, changing the rewards program for their credit cards, attempting to force onstar subscriptions, etc)
It was never removed from the lineup. It's been standard since 2021. The only vehicles that don't come with it are the EV'S
Sort of weird body styling
I like the look but that engine is ridiculous. 1.5 litre turbo rated at 175 h.p. is gutless. The pricing in Canada is also ridiculous IMO.
Currently one of the ugliest vehicles on the road. Looks like it is going to stay that way in the near future as well.
Sorry that award goes to the new equinox and the new traverse
Why you would buy this over a Rav 4 or Corolla Cross is beyond me.
It's bigger than both of those (especially the rear legroom), that's one reason. But I think there are better choices out there if you want something bigger than the RAV4 or CC.
Terrain has Better reliability per J.D. Power 2023
Why would they not make the gauge cluster screen match the shape of the dash around it!? 🤢
I'd prefer the front to be smaller and easier to see over, but it definitely looks better resolved than the previous generation. Matte chrome is much better than the previous gen. Don't care for the AT4 at all. The interior is quite nice. The only thing really missing is a hybrid and I can't help but think that will be a challenge for sales as time moves on. Would help the car to feel peppier too.
Really like the buttons along the bottom of touch-tone-screen (Tablet). Also like Vertical Tablet below dashboard top cover, like vertical tablet on top of floor console
GMC junk.
Good for the competition. Will never buy any of GM vehicles again though. One nightmare is enough.
Underwhelming, but at least there will be more stock than Toyota and Honda combined.
The sweet-spot in the outgoing Terrain was when they offered the 2.0L turbo. Sounds like that won't be available this time around... 🙄
I have a 2024 Terrain Denali which I love. However, I hate the new tablet display on the 2025. GM has given up actually designing attractive dashes and is just sticking in huge computer screens instead. 2025 Buicks and Cadillacs also have terribly over sized screens. At least on the 2025 Chevy Equinox the digital screens are molded into the dash and not just stuck in place.
Took a Uber the other day. 2012 Ford Escape Hybrid. IT HAD 779,000 MILES ON THE DASH I SWEAR TO EVERYONES GOD...These comments aren't from Americans. Other Channels are praising this Model. You guys are horrible lol
American Brand Cars have more miles on the dash THAN OVER SEA BRANDS!!!!!!!
SEATS SUCK. thin unpadded and uncomfortable. Good luck.
Alex I’ve watch your reviews a long time,and because I know you have your stuff together,please answer one question for me,I have a 2022 crv with awd is this the same system that Acura has? I know your a busy guy,so thanks for your time.HD PAYNE.
If you're going to do contrast stitching, you better make sure the stitching lines up nicely. Some of those stitches were rough.
Put the diesel and add a hybrid on every midsize truck and suv, add a rear locker, and there's your recipe for huge sales. You've created a go anywhere torque monster that's great on fuel.
Wider yes but not longer according to GM (unless the 2026 Denali Trim has different dimension specs compared to the 2025 Elevation which loses 2 inches of length compared to all 2024 Terrains trims).
It is a beautiful car until you raise the hood. There is nothing there!!! Come on General, put a motor in it. How about that 300 HP. V-6 ? I had one in an Acadia, great motor!!!
Have driven the rental spec with the 1.5L engine, definitely not an enjoyable drive with 4 people on board. GM always makes some baffling decisions
Oh. If that’s the best looking version of the Terrain .. that’s more of a shame than a modest powered drivetrain. How does GMC justify such an unattractive vehicle for the Denali product line? This is no time to test the Aztec concept ..
Oh, stop the "BS.” It doesn’t matter what color your car is for you to be comfortable in a hot climate. Answer this question. Who is more comfortable in a hot climate, a white person or a black person?
Alex this is the third review i watched on the new terrain you were the only one to find the spare tire or even mention it. Thanks for going the extra mile!!
Professional Grade Meh. Chunky interior with piano black and chrome, weak engine. There are so many better choices than this.
They could have done something different with the instrument cluster on these new GM vehicles. Along with the Canyon and Acadia, it looks like the cluster was an afterthought. You have a big hole and they just stuck a tablet in there. I would rather see the entire opening with a digital cluster integrated into the opening.
That engine looks tiny. They certainly have room to put in something bigger. It’s almost as if they weren’t planning on having a gas model at all so they didn’t put any thought into the powertrain.
So tired of the fake “we’re going more premium “ no you’re still just at best matching a Kia for a higher price
NEWS FLASH: You do not have to buy one. 🤷🏽♂️
Unfortunately the power train carryover is a non starter for many. It wasn't good before and once again GM missed the boat with the engine.
Yikes, those power numbers seem low for a brand trying to position themselves as the premium pick in the class.
I thought the front end of the current generation was bad. This generation takes the "meh" up a notch.
I think gm really missed the ball when it comes to the engine under the hood. I think they did a great job with the redesign but that power figure just isn’t enough.
I love your Channel. I hate these comments. Are these real Americans commenting?🤔
What’s with all the GM bashers? Looks like a great product
This size vehicle need 250 hp. Else feel under powered.
You have not gotten the memo? No four I4 turbo, v6 engine only.
There needs to be a plug in hybrid and power folding mirrors
Equinox has the same engine and it has massive problems
Love LCD Screen with buttons on it nice design
That is one of the slowest tablet head units I’ve ever seen.
will supercruise be an option?
What is the MPG? When is a hybrid or even EV version coming out?
Alex said: Not available yet
Phev model coming for 2026.
It still looks bad from the side. Especially on the lower trim. Squat is what comes to mind. I just hope for shoppers it doesn’t feel horribly cheap inside like last gen.
Weird trim and body lines front and rear as well
Looks like an ipad
We have a 2019 GMC Terrain Denali with the 2.0 t, we absolutely love it. I have to say I like the looks of the new Terrain. I’m not sure about a silver roof on black, the different coloured A pillars really throw me off, maybe in person it looks better. Screen orientation is cool and a nice interior. As for double screens in vehicles, I’m still getting use to 2 screens. I drove a 2005 Kia spectra up till last year, putting over 330 000 kms on it, then we purchase the Terrain used
Doesn’t seems like this can take on the Sportage, Santa Fe, future RAV4, and current CRV. It better be cheap and have a hybrid model
Exterior dizayn 👍.
monitor 👎
Well why would I buy a GMAC at this date and time. They are having All kinds of recalls and issues with the electronics and engines.
Love the new look of the vehicle overall. Never liked the low nose on the current model. The 25 cures that. I'll be in the market in late 25 for something new. The AT4 looks like a great choice with 20" wheels!!
I don't mind the light over the front wheel well, but the back one is useless, and I think confusing to drivers next to them. Having it built into the rear light is better IMHO. Oh, and I'm guessing GMC went with blinking brake lights - again.
Looks way too much like the Mitsubishi Outlander front. I never liked the look of the finder becoming a part of the grill/front end view.
Alex, thanks for another comprehensive review. You do the best job addressing what is important. Extra credit for showing the sunglasses holder. I use mine all the time in my last 4 vehicles. One of my favorite features and so many cars are doing away with them. Again I appreciate your detail oriented reviews.
GMC Acadia - Yukon Junior
GMC Terrain - Baby Yukon