the deathleaper being your warlord basically just lets you take the deathleaper as your only character if you so wish, because you must include a warlord.
The cover enhancement works with the main rule rather well. As the gaunts move towards the enemy after getting shot, they can move without concern for cover.
Do you think the Crusher Stampede rule could work better if you're able to fling your monsters into combat all over the map, so your opponent is forced to damage multiple monsters without necessarily being able to kill all of them?
Assimilation Swarm seems like it has a ton of potential. It doesn't have as much obvious power as Vanguard or Invasion Fleet, but with the right list construction and game-plan I think it could really sing.
I think it suffers from the Necrons in 9th problem. The mass regen is great if your stuff can survive the enemy turn but in reality against most top end armies you won't ever be regenerating stuff because either your units will be full HP or dead.
Thanks for the review. Really interesting. Obviously this codex would have been written 12 months ago so we shouldnt expect much change. Hopefully it ages well and they learnt from 9th and the power level stays here for the rest of the codexes.
Potential for these to be worked on within the last 3-5 years, given GW's general production pipeline and needing to include new models, Codices tended to be much shorter timelines in 9e cause no new units releases (mostly) concurrently. Indexes for sure were probably written halfway through the 9E dexes, explaining the "You already leaned these lessons why go back" of some of the rules
@@Beaunage Releasing all codices at once would be a gargantuan effort and terrible for the marketing pipeline and if you think they would get balance better when launching every army at once you are delusional. Releasing every codex at once and then just going away for 3 years and not releasing anything would be horrible for everyone.
54:00 Surprise Assault doesn't require that the unit you choose is able to target or even see the enemy selected. That means that if you want your opponent to just randomly have to take a Battle-shock test on a unit that’s holding a crucial objective in their Fight Phase, you can just spend a CP to make them do that, which is certainly a useful tool to have in your pocket
so weird how they removed the lictor invul. almost feel like a typo. was that only worth 5points? and deathleaper is 5p more with 3+/4++ and extra rules??
So does this mean they will be updating the online datasheets? Or do we have to buy the book for the new datasheets. They will be making index cards for these and they have revealed the neurolictor online
Im super excited to see what we can wiggle out in this codex, there seems to be a huge variety, and enough rule interaction depth to relaly get some dark horse lists winning
I’m pretty disappointed by the Norn costs. Comparing their chassis to other monster Chasis… 190 for a T Fex means you’re probably not taking those gorgeous models. Sad.
Yup, though worth noting the Tfex got nerfed and lost his -1 damage so he isn't nearly as good anymore either. Imo still better value than the Norns though.
My problem with the neurolictor is that his battleshock happens during your command phase. So opponents can just… slowly back up a few inches and then it does nothing
I will say this as a Tyranid player who did play 1 tournament with biovores that rule was rediculously obnoxious to use and watch opponets struggle to move around with so i am glad they didnt change the spore mines but instead made it so only 1 can be shot so it makes movement blocking less toxic overall. Assimilator sounds fun and i say this as a tyrant gaurd enthusist if i bring swarmlord next to these guys im hopeing i can get my T8 body gaurds back just by being near a ripper or Pyrovore bar that synaptic would be my go to cause i collected 18 zoans and by golly im gonna use that reroll 1s strat haha. Edit: Nuro tyrant in assimilator regening tyrant gaurd o---o;;;
If the heart can only be put on a synapse model can you not put it on the parasite like you had said? Orrrr did the parasite gain synapse because he didn’t have it in index and you hadn’t noted that in your changes
Unfortunately, I believe I misspoke. The parasite does not have synapse. I assumed she did from Ninth, and never noticed that she lost it in the index. :’( she does not have it now!
Great review gentlemen. I'm disappointed in my Genestealers' rules. I'm not sure why GW hates them, but i miss the days they were useful and good! I'm excited to try these out, but yeah, Crusher Swarm is a joke. GW could have been more inventive with this one. Oh well. Let's see how they play
The book was locked in and finalized months before 10th even dropped. Doesn't surprise me that they haven't adjusted it at all based on what we saw after 10th launched.
@@ryancooper3629 I guess we do have to wait a little longer for the balance dataslate, but I’m still not happy with how they have treated both of my armies
@@stevenburton7725 I agree, this feels like the same as 9th where the first two books are super conservative and rapidly get outclassed by power creep.
In lore, I don't think They're considered part of the harvesting swarm and that seems a bit of the priority for GW this ed. But they'd work real nicely in it so that's a shame
If they've already printed the Admech codexes with copy-paste datasheets (and rad bombardment) from the index, GW needs to delay the codex and print new ones. I will outright refuse to buy a codex with those datasheets in it for my main army, they're that bad. Most of those datasheets have no place in the game and are completely unusable. The first and most crucial step to ensuring Admech doesn't have an utterly miserable next 3 years of the game is re-writing the majority of their datasheets, and reverting a lot of it back towards what it always was: 4+ saves, BS3+, WS3+ on the melee units, etc. Literally wtf were GW thinking with WS4+ Ruststalkers, with only AP-1, and no way to buff themselves? Wtf were they thinking with BS4+ Rangers with 5+ saves and no AP? This cannot be copy-pasted into the codex. If it is, Admech players will boycott it and not buy that shit.
You expected playtesting to change your army when the codex is releasing in 2 months and was probably written 3-5 years ago knowing GW's production pipeline? WAIT 😂
That said, the detachment rules /CAN/ make the army extremely powerful, may you get spicy detachment rules 🙌 And hopefully a pts tweak in balance to bump you into comp territory
Can you explain yourself? GK are heard to have weaker datacards, and wildly strong faction rules. Meanwhile tyranids units have some hits and some misses, and a large variety. Due to Biovores tyranids are on a 50+% winrate. My point is they differ from GK, so wherein lies the comparison?
Crusher Stampede is utter garbage. You will take any detachment over this, for your monsters. Which is failed design, and draws shame over the name Crusher Stampede.
Yup, though this nerf wasn't a reaction to players. This codex would have been locked and being printed long before 10th started. I think the sad part, though, is that biovores are god awful other than this silly rules loophole letting them launch secondary scoring units. If/once that gets fixed a biovore is a joke. D3 S6 shots at 4+ BS for 45 points? Like good god bad.
as a dg/tau/mechanicum player the news rules havent changed saddens me. i really hope some factions get a hand and their rules changed a little. looking at fate dice or oath of moment compared to sticky objectives just looks gross. like gw is making fun of some factions almost
Technically speaking you should be comparing combat doctrines and unparalleled mastery to sticky objectives. Not saying that makes it much better as sticky objectives is a horrible detachment rule but detachment rules are generally less powerful than the overall faction rule. In the Death Guard codex you're likely to get some stronger detachment rules than at least. It's contagions you're stuck with which are at least better than sticky objectives.
Also this is the furst codex whixh has been printed when the indexes released. On theyr website they said that they will change some of the index detachments in the codex.
Use some common sense dude... The first 3-4 codices were almost certainly written & finished alongside and/or within a month or so of the Indexes going to print. Absolutely 0 'public' games were played before any of these books were shipped off to the printers, thus, there will have been no ability to edit and/or re-jiggle wonky/under preforming rules. This is exactly why you NEVER want to be one of the first 4-6 books released. Sadly, Ad Mech players are probably going to get a trash codex this edition, as due to lead times, GW will maybe have had all of a month or so, if even that, of 'normal' games & tournament data to expose the issues with their Index rules. Tau, Votann, DG, GK's & Sisters are in better positions, since none of those are even on the Codex Roadmap yet, thus those books are all at a minimum 9+ months away from release. Thus, there absolutely IS time to go back & fix some of those glaring issues. (and besides Votann, it's possible some or even all of those armies could even be 12-20+ months away from release!)
I find it so hard to get excited about 10th😢 This used to be like Christmas feeling. Anyone actually like the new edition? Tips? Really want to get back in it. Feels like the community should probably create an alternative ruleset at this point. Find the new edition to be far too extreme at everything😓
I think alot of us like it. I just returned after 10 years away, so cant say alot about 7th-9th edition. But 9th felt like a bloated mess when I tried to read up on the rules. 10th feels fun. Unbalanced? Sure. But they literaly made new mini-codexes for every army. But since they will patch everything quarterly? I can have patience. And this is comming from a Sisters player, with a realy weak index. Now, I havent played it to death, nor faced tons of different armies. But on a "friendly level" the game feels solid.
10th is brilliant. Have you played some actual games? Don’t listen or read all the negative stuff. I’ve found it super fun and much easier but also spending hours building lists which is super fun!
Gotta say, 10th is a game whose level of enjoyment can reeaaallly depend on the army you play. Certain armies got really screwed over with either shitty rules, shitty datasheets, or shitty both. If you're one of those, 10th kinda really sucks with how much stompier it is. If you are good or fighting at least a similar tiered army, then it is really fun! As a Grey Knight player, so far I really hate the edition. Teleporting everywhere is cool, but I came to the faction for basically futuristic psychic paladins. Since datasheets don't seem to be getting corrected (our datasheets suck really bad), I think my army might just be awful unless they give us INSANE synergy through the detachment alone. Like, I get frothingly jealous at normal Marines being able to do actual combos, but now I'm just ranting. Basically, the game is fun if the opponent is on an even playing field. Sadly, it's the most imbalanced I've seen since 7th edition.
Man I majorly disagree. The balance is a bit shaky right now as it was early into 9th, but I'm VERY happy with the general shape of the rules for 10th. I think they made a lot of smart changes to how things work in 10th. If this tyranid codex is indicative of future codexes, we're gonna be in a very good place this edition.
Lol how? Still less then all those subfactions, strats and Army of Renown of last edition . You only have to see the double page of the detachment of your enemy and have to rebember just 6 strats
So....rapid ingressing is a wasted CP if you fail the dice, a players important unit is now sidelined for a turn, and so the entire tempo of the game can be dictated by a single dice. Wow.....what a bull!^#@ enhancement. Obliterators are nearly useless now. 4 inch movement.....zero reason to field them at the start of the game, and now 50% chance to not bring them in on the turn you need them to come in on.....lol I'm just gonna let any tyranid player I go up against control my army from the start if they run the nexus attachment.
0:00 Sponsors
1:00 Intro
2:05 Quinton Fun Fact
3:25 Cover
5:06 Combat Patrol
5:53 What is in a Codex?
7:29 Tyranid Invasion Fleet
12:51 Crusher Stampede
23:17 Unending Swarms
36:03 Assimilation Swarm
48:19 Vanguard Assault
59:33 Synaptic Nexus
1:11:37 Datasheets
1:18:51 Datasheet - Norn
1:28:09 Datasheet - Neurolichter
1:34:30 Datasheet - Termagaunt
1:37:14 Datasheet - Genestealer
1:38:14 Datasheet - Neurogaunts
1:38:19 Datasheet - Raveners
1:38:54 Datasheet - Biovores
1:39:53 Datasheet - Harpy
1:40:12 Datasheet - Lichter
1:41:28 Datasheet - Psychophage
1:42:29 Datasheet - Spore Cyst
1:43:52 Datasheet - Tyrannifex
1:43:47 Outro
Kind of funny that the harvester detachment is better for monster spam than crusher stampede is.
GW can’t design rules to save their life. At least the detachments aren’t connected to color schemes or subfaction identities
I feel like it'd be much better if screamer-killers and maleceptors could attach to carnifex bricks like ogryn or cryptothralls.
the deathleaper being your warlord basically just lets you take the deathleaper as your only character if you so wish, because you must include a warlord.
The cover enhancement works with the main rule rather well. As the gaunts move towards the enemy after getting shot, they can move without concern for cover.
Good point! If you’re worried about not wanting to stay near venomthropes that has some good value.
I am not a Tyranid player, but the Norn Emissary and Assimilator both look fantastic.
I am very curious to see how well the parasite of mortex works in assimilation swarm
Do you think the Crusher Stampede rule could work better if you're able to fling your monsters into combat all over the map, so your opponent is forced to damage multiple monsters without necessarily being able to kill all of them?
Assimilation Swarm seems like it has a ton of potential. It doesn't have as much obvious power as Vanguard or Invasion Fleet, but with the right list construction and game-plan I think it could really sing.
I think it suffers from the Necrons in 9th problem. The mass regen is great if your stuff can survive the enemy turn but in reality against most top end armies you won't ever be regenerating stuff because either your units will be full HP or dead.
Yes, but when it pigeonholes you into taking 4 units... I think the problem is the limited number of harvester units.
1:14:00 is when they change from talking about detatchments to points and datasheets for those who need to back reference
Thanks for the review. Really interesting. Obviously this codex would have been written 12 months ago so we shouldnt expect much change. Hopefully it ages well and they learnt from 9th and the power level stays here for the rest of the codexes.
Potential for these to be worked on within the last 3-5 years, given GW's general production pipeline and needing to include new models, Codices tended to be much shorter timelines in 9e cause no new units releases (mostly) concurrently. Indexes for sure were probably written halfway through the 9E dexes, explaining the "You already leaned these lessons why go back" of some of the rules
I just want this. Every future codex should be balanced against this tyranid codex
You don’t need to increase biovore points anymore because they can’t all seed spore mines.
There is only thing I would have liked more than getting our codex first. That would be for us to get it in the middle of the row.
Or they could stop being so bad as a company and release them all at the same time.
@@Beaunage Releasing all codices at once would be a gargantuan effort and terrible for the marketing pipeline and if you think they would get balance better when launching every army at once you are delusional. Releasing every codex at once and then just going away for 3 years and not releasing anything would be horrible for everyone.
54:00 Surprise Assault doesn't require that the unit you choose is able to target or even see the enemy selected. That means that if you want your opponent to just randomly have to take a Battle-shock test on a unit that’s holding a crucial objective in their Fight Phase, you can just spend a CP to make them do that, which is certainly a useful tool to have in your pocket
so weird how they removed the lictor invul. almost feel like a typo. was that only worth 5points? and deathleaper is 5p more with 3+/4++ and extra rules??
3 Pyrovore for 90 points in an Assimilation Swarm is not a bad idea at all.
So does this mean they will be updating the online datasheets? Or do we have to buy the book for the new datasheets. They will be making index cards for these and they have revealed the neurolictor online
Assimilation swarm looks hilarious.
I was, yesterday, pretty amazed by the melee of my Barbed Hierodule. 8 attacks S14 ds-2 (yea sad) d3+3 damage ist quite nasty^^
I'm hoping to get some use from my Scythed Hierodule still
Im super excited to see what we can wiggle out in this codex, there seems to be a huge variety, and enough rule interaction depth to relaly get some dark horse lists winning
Great to see the creep doesn't seem to be strong in this one
I’m pretty disappointed by the Norn costs. Comparing their chassis to other monster Chasis… 190 for a T Fex means you’re probably not taking those gorgeous models.
Sad.
Yup, though worth noting the Tfex got nerfed and lost his -1 damage so he isn't nearly as good anymore either. Imo still better value than the Norns though.
Vanguard Assult for my Kraken army is top choice.
How would you guys gear out a flying Hive Tyrant? Got surprised it got the Vanguard Invader keyword so would add it to my starting army
My problem with the neurolictor is that his battleshock happens during your command phase. So opponents can just… slowly back up a few inches and then it does nothing
It’s useful for protecting your objectives from being flipped, which does a decent amount for a bargain lone op
Let's go, John.
My takeaway as a potential Tyranid opponent: I want to play against this army, the more variance the better.
its funny how genestealers dont have harvester when its literally in their name.
Thats because geneoverwriter or genechanger dosent have the same ring to it. They don't actually take genes. They imprint their own.
I don't think Biovores will come up again in points, considering they are nerfed to only seed 1 Spore Mine per turn for your army.
Is irresistible will rerolls aura for both melee and shooting or just melee?
now is a great time to do a Masterclass for Nids.
Believe me it’s coming soon! I want to get a good number of games in first to make sure I’m imparting correct knowledge.
I have lots of genestealers as a cults player so Vanguard is what im playing. Im so dissapointed raveners arem't vanguard.
I will say this as a Tyranid player who did play 1 tournament with biovores that rule was rediculously obnoxious to use and watch opponets struggle to move around with so i am glad they didnt change the spore mines but instead made it so only 1 can be shot so it makes movement blocking less toxic overall. Assimilator sounds fun and i say this as a tyrant gaurd enthusist if i bring swarmlord next to these guys im hopeing i can get my T8 body gaurds back just by being near a ripper or Pyrovore bar that synaptic would be my go to cause i collected 18 zoans and by golly im gonna use that reroll 1s strat haha. Edit: Nuro tyrant in assimilator regening tyrant gaurd o---o;;;
You sorta can still do it, just with Rippers now. They are 15pts for a one model unit with deep strike. Essentially the same thing.
Hivemind hype train coming through! 🎉🎉🎉
If the heart can only be put on a synapse model can you not put it on the parasite like you had said? Orrrr did the parasite gain synapse because he didn’t have it in index and you hadn’t noted that in your changes
Unfortunately, I believe I misspoke. The parasite does not have synapse. I assumed she did from Ninth, and never noticed that she lost it in the index. :’( she does not have it now!
@@ArtofWar40k dang was hopping she got it back would have been nice to put the -1 leadership enhancement on there
8:12 Nids 51% win rate? 40Kstats has them on 48% win rate.
I don't get how it will be balanced when all codexes come... even with index cards it's super unbalanced
Pleas do the time stamps
Love so many of these rules, but the datasheet nerfs. What's going on there?
Did they mention special wepons on termagaunts?
Yep. Apparently the "web shooter" weapon is good but the rest are meh
Great review gentlemen. I'm disappointed in my Genestealers' rules. I'm not sure why GW hates them, but i miss the days they were useful and good!
I'm excited to try these out, but yeah, Crusher Swarm is a joke. GW could have been more inventive with this one. Oh well. Let's see how they play
But why the Pyrovores? Why - You guys are too funny 😂
37:00 minutes in
The points lead me to believe that GW are still punishing melee focused units, other than Lychguard and Custodes. Still waiting not happy with this
The book was locked in and finalized months before 10th even dropped. Doesn't surprise me that they haven't adjusted it at all based on what we saw after 10th launched.
@@ryancooper3629 I guess we do have to wait a little longer for the balance dataslate, but I’m still not happy with how they have treated both of my armies
@@stevenburton7725 I agree, this feels like the same as 9th where the first two books are super conservative and rapidly get outclassed by power creep.
@@ryancooper3629 but, if you remember Necrons from 9th, the dataslates should help struggling armies
It's certainly a book, Chat.
Should Tervegon be a Harvestor?
In lore, I don't think They're considered part of the harvesting swarm and that seems a bit of the priority for GW this ed. But they'd work real nicely in it so that's a shame
Awesome❤❤
The costing of the Norns makes no sense, having the by far worse choice be more expensive?
I see John is back to his mormon(y) bearded ways
If they've already printed the Admech codexes with copy-paste datasheets (and rad bombardment) from the index, GW needs to delay the codex and print new ones.
I will outright refuse to buy a codex with those datasheets in it for my main army, they're that bad. Most of those datasheets have no place in the game and are completely unusable.
The first and most crucial step to ensuring Admech doesn't have an utterly miserable next 3 years of the game is re-writing the majority of their datasheets, and reverting a lot of it back towards what it always was:
4+ saves, BS3+, WS3+ on the melee units, etc.
Literally wtf were GW thinking with WS4+ Ruststalkers, with only AP-1, and no way to buff themselves? Wtf were they thinking with BS4+ Rangers with 5+ saves and no AP?
This cannot be copy-pasted into the codex. If it is, Admech players will boycott it and not buy that shit.
I wish warriors could lead gaunt units.
So crusher is poop then aye?
assimilation swarm cant revive rippers as they are swarm
what shame. only heal them
So if the rules don't change , my GK will get suck rules and 5 more detachments.
You expected their playtesting to change an army in 2 months?😅
You expected playtesting to change your army when the codex is releasing in 2 months and was probably written 3-5 years ago knowing GW's production pipeline?
WAIT 😂
That said, the detachment rules /CAN/ make the army extremely powerful, may you get spicy detachment rules 🙌 And hopefully a pts tweak in balance to bump you into comp territory
Can you explain yourself? GK are heard to have weaker datacards, and wildly strong faction rules. Meanwhile tyranids units have some hits and some misses, and a large variety. Due to Biovores tyranids are on a 50+% winrate.
My point is they differ from GK, so wherein lies the comparison?
Timestamps pliz
👍
Well it looks like there are going to be power crept out of the game ready fast this codex is not strong
Give enough stats to sell some models
You guys should try Grimdark Future and put some of that content on the channel.
geez burning beyond the midnight oil
There was no 5th edition eldar codex.
Crusher Stampede is utter garbage. You will take any detachment over this, for your monsters. Which is failed design, and draws shame over the name Crusher Stampede.
Tyranid players ruined Biovores lmao. Any list ever brought 2 minimum
Yes. Though was it the datacard or the players?
Yup, though this nerf wasn't a reaction to players. This codex would have been locked and being printed long before 10th started.
I think the sad part, though, is that biovores are god awful other than this silly rules loophole letting them launch secondary scoring units. If/once that gets fixed a biovore is a joke. D3 S6 shots at 4+ BS for 45 points? Like good god bad.
Those 'facts' are just uncheckable shouts
hyyype
Did tyranids get WORSE with their codex??? What the fuzz 😢
Nah, since the existing 10e stuff is still there they aren't gonna be getting worse at all.
Some tyranids got less strong, yes. Others got changed with access to new synergies.
Some things got worse, other things got better. Overall probably comes out to be about the same.
as a dg/tau/mechanicum player the news rules havent changed saddens me. i really hope some factions get a hand and their rules changed a little. looking at fate dice or oath of moment compared to sticky objectives just looks gross. like gw is making fun of some factions almost
Technically speaking you should be comparing combat doctrines and unparalleled mastery to sticky objectives. Not saying that makes it much better as sticky objectives is a horrible detachment rule but detachment rules are generally less powerful than the overall faction rule. In the Death Guard codex you're likely to get some stronger detachment rules than at least. It's contagions you're stuck with which are at least better than sticky objectives.
Yeah, I really hoped the current Shadow in the Warp was an index thing. The balancing of the faction specials is so horrible bad
To be fair, it's likely the nid codex was finalised before 10th was launched and we have the data we have now.
Also this is the furst codex whixh has been printed when the indexes released. On theyr website they said that they will change some of the index detachments in the codex.
Use some common sense dude... The first 3-4 codices were almost certainly written & finished alongside and/or within a month or so of the Indexes going to print. Absolutely 0 'public' games were played before any of these books were shipped off to the printers, thus, there will have been no ability to edit and/or re-jiggle wonky/under preforming rules.
This is exactly why you NEVER want to be one of the first 4-6 books released.
Sadly, Ad Mech players are probably going to get a trash codex this edition, as due to lead times, GW will maybe have had all of a month or so, if even that, of 'normal' games & tournament data to expose the issues with their Index rules.
Tau, Votann, DG, GK's & Sisters are in better positions, since none of those are even on the Codex Roadmap yet, thus those books are all at a minimum 9+ months away from release. Thus, there absolutely IS time to go back & fix some of those glaring issues. (and besides Votann, it's possible some or even all of those armies could even be 12-20+ months away from release!)
I find it so hard to get excited about 10th😢 This used to be like Christmas feeling.
Anyone actually like the new edition? Tips? Really want to get back in it.
Feels like the community should probably create an alternative ruleset at this point. Find the new edition to be far too extreme at everything😓
I think alot of us like it.
I just returned after 10 years away, so cant say alot about 7th-9th edition.
But 9th felt like a bloated mess when I tried to read up on the rules.
10th feels fun. Unbalanced? Sure. But they literaly made new mini-codexes for every army. But since they will patch everything quarterly? I can have patience. And this is comming from a Sisters player, with a realy weak index.
Now, I havent played it to death, nor faced tons of different armies. But on a "friendly level" the game feels solid.
10th is brilliant. Have you played some actual games? Don’t listen or read all the negative stuff. I’ve found it super fun and much easier but also spending hours building lists which is super fun!
Gotta say, 10th is a game whose level of enjoyment can reeaaallly depend on the army you play. Certain armies got really screwed over with either shitty rules, shitty datasheets, or shitty both. If you're one of those, 10th kinda really sucks with how much stompier it is. If you are good or fighting at least a similar tiered army, then it is really fun!
As a Grey Knight player, so far I really hate the edition. Teleporting everywhere is cool, but I came to the faction for basically futuristic psychic paladins. Since datasheets don't seem to be getting corrected (our datasheets suck really bad), I think my army might just be awful unless they give us INSANE synergy through the detachment alone. Like, I get frothingly jealous at normal Marines being able to do actual combos, but now I'm just ranting.
Basically, the game is fun if the opponent is on an even playing field. Sadly, it's the most imbalanced I've seen since 7th edition.
Man I majorly disagree. The balance is a bit shaky right now as it was early into 9th, but I'm VERY happy with the general shape of the rules for 10th. I think they made a lot of smart changes to how things work in 10th. If this tyranid codex is indicative of future codexes, we're gonna be in a very good place this edition.
i like 10th far more then 9th.
2 CP to bring back a unit that GSC gets armywide all the time for all units for free.... Terrible.
Simplified but not simple lmao what a joke. If each codex gets 6 detachments and 6 strats this will be the most blaoted edition ever
Lol how? Still less then all those subfactions, strats and Army of Renown of last edition .
You only have to see the double page of the detachment of your enemy and have to rebember just 6 strats
So....rapid ingressing is a wasted CP if you fail the dice, a players important unit is now sidelined for a turn, and so the entire tempo of the game can be dictated by a single dice. Wow.....what a bull!^#@ enhancement. Obliterators are nearly useless now. 4 inch movement.....zero reason to field them at the start of the game, and now 50% chance to not bring them in on the turn you need them to come in on.....lol I'm just gonna let any tyranid player I go up against control my army from the start if they run the nexus attachment.
Read the codex cover to cover.....didn't read the combat patrol rules😂 Dude you funny
Because combat patrol is almost a different game