Electronic Evidence and the New Rules on Evidence

Among its many innovations, the New Rules on Evidence (NRE) incorporates some of the provisions of the 2001 Rules on Electronic Evidence (REE). Questions still linger how the NRE has changed the REE and which of them govern the presentation of electronic documents. This Webinar will address those concerns and relate them to the challenges of proving electronic documents and contracts in court.

[@MrEBM]

Thank you so much. This was very helpful in my study of evidence.

[@chrishernandez1197]

JJ I think that you are right. The witness-declarant testifying is different from a non-witness declarant. There are 2 persons. That is why there is an independently relevant statement rule.

[@jamalsalic5048]

1st comment. Salamat po disini law firm

[@taleweaver34]

This is awesome!

[@markushernandez7523]

This new definition of hearsay merely clarified the confusion caused where the witness currently testifying testified and narrated the statement that she previously made out of court, which could still be objected to as hearsay even if it was the witness herself saying what she previously said out of court. However, it did not change the old definition of hearsay that it is an out of court statement, whether made by the witness currently testifying or any other person, offered to prove the truth of such statement. I hope that this mis appreciation of the hearsay rule can be corrected in the future.

[@nimfajumamoy2580]

Kargado mn ug ahhhhh ahhhhh oi, pero im still listening po...

[@isaiaspagar6121]

May I clarify on the admission of evidence re: admission of a person in the out of court scenario that may violate the protected freedom against self - incrimination during say a custodial investigation, or whatever...please clarify as adding this as an excepted item will make the state's arsenal impregnable. Thanks

[@charlestuo2702]

authentication? simple lang. Sabi sa rules on the manner of authentication , normally is under the 3rd mode - other proof showing its integrity and reliability. More often is thru a witness who is a party (in ephemeral evidence) or has personal knowledge. Ganun. Of course you must lay the predicate/premises/basis first. Wag pahirapan ang sarili, wag labanan ang issue, practical use is the key. Yan ang kailangan para maging admissible ang ebidensya with weight.

[@edgardoparducho1929]

Attorney accepted by the court po ba ang emailed judicial affidavit?, salamuch

[@gilmendoza7952]

Permission to share on my Facebook profile po.

[@zethfederre1311]

Sir nakaka distruct ang puro mo ahh ahh ahh..

[@zethfederre1311]

Puro ka ah sir