Mr Marc Laniado discusses Aquablation treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 39

  • @garycortesi8406
    @garycortesi8406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Had PAE over a year ago and was good for about 8 months. Now seems to be backtracking and looking in Aquablation.

  • @PatrickSkidmore
    @PatrickSkidmore ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I had aquablation by Mr Laniado 2 months ago in the UK and it was a great decision, I'm delighted with the results. Only had 2 days in hospital then 2 days to recover off work and back to normal within a week or so. Now no issues with slow peeing or having to go every hour like previously. Plus I've kept full erection and ejaculation ability which I know that some of the other other treatments don't. Would definitely recommend it.

    • @garycortesi8406
      @garycortesi8406 ปีที่แล้ว

      Had my aquablation February 8. Still have blood in my pee, do you? Had an overnight stay and went home without a catheter. My doctor told me don't even think about sex for a month so glad to hear you already had no full erection and ejaculation problems. I am 70 and in good shape because of being very active. Hope you are the same.

    • @PatrickSkidmore
      @PatrickSkidmore ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garycortesi8406 Hi. I only had blood for about 2-3 days, then again after I think day 12 for a day or so (I was told about this beforehand), though I did get tested for a UTI in case I had an infection, this was negative. Since then nothing. Yes I'm quite active, I do alot of running, though I didn't do any for a month after the operation just in case, just walking.

    • @sirus312
      @sirus312 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garycortesi8406 doing better ?

    • @italopellegrino6122
      @italopellegrino6122 ปีที่แล้ว

      does the operation with aquabeam preserve all the functions? to what extent? Furthermore, does it make it more difficult later to ascertain any prostate cancer that may have occurred or not? I also heard that the aquabeam procedure makes radiotherapy unfeasible.

  • @WilliamMartinez-lm1sk
    @WilliamMartinez-lm1sk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello. I think I'm more inclined, to Aquablation Therapy. I will recommend this to a lot of my friends. God bless you, from America, with love. 🤑🤓🤗😎😀.

  • @italopellegrino6122
    @italopellegrino6122 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    does the operation with aquabeam preserve all the functions? to what extent? Furthermore, does it make it more difficult later to ascertain any prostate cancer that may have occurred or not? I also heard that the aquabeam procedure makes radiotherapy unfeasible.

  • @stuartlee6622
    @stuartlee6622 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm torn between Rezum and aquablation.

    • @johnnyhorizon8368
      @johnnyhorizon8368 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m in the same dilemma!
      I crossed off Urolift & TURP.

    • @StevenBanks123
      @StevenBanks123 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also.aquablation seems to give a better targeted result and less discomfort, but with a greater chance of ED or nerve impingement, even if your doctor is experienced.

    • @stuartlee6622
      @stuartlee6622 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I decided on Rezum.

    • @johnnyhorizon8368
      @johnnyhorizon8368 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stuartlee6622 Have u had the procedure yet?

    • @stuartlee6622
      @stuartlee6622 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnnyhorizon8368 At end of August.