Are you serious? It's not surprising at all. It's not that they "refuse to recognize this level of expertise".. The problem is they CANT recognize it. These are a bunch of people who think brining a spirit level on an aircraft constitutes a meaningful scientific experiment. They simply lack the mental aptitude required to understand it(or anything for that matter).. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" :)
@@uhohDavinci I think on some level it is a refusal. I'm sure most flerfs are expert a something. Suppose it is auto mechanics. They would take extreme umbrage if you told them lug nuts should be torqued to 50 in-lbs. To fail to exhibit reciprocal deference to expertise requires at least some degree of choice.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
The Great Trigonometric Survey of India should be required study. Measuring the altitude of Chomolungma to within 10 meters from "wet feet" in the 19th century is amazing.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Unfortunately flerfs will never watch this video. They'd rather stand on the beach and say it looks flat. So many fields of science are involved in researching this area I'd like to thank you for the clear abridged overview. Cheers
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
As always, Tony does not disappoint when driving a stake through the heart of stupidity and ignorance. This is very interesting and provides substantive evidence showing the water is not finding its own level and is definitely not flat by any means.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Please be the first round earth genius to provide 1 proof. Of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve. Curve calculator says 5 miles should be behind 16 feet of curve. We should be able to see millions of examples of curve. Yet round earthers can't provide 1 proof. Why not? According to you your intelligence is a higher level. Than fake flat earth disinformation actors. Most people common sense kicks in noones this dumb.
Another great video. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I wish I could sit and have a conversation with you because I'm sure I'd learn so much. I'm a land surveyor by trade and these flerfs are so ridiculous!
Still waiting for just one flerf to use a P1000 to bring a boat back that has gone COMPLETELY over the curve of earth. I guess I'll be waiting a while...
Its a shame there are not more tall ships. Ponders why the crows nest is high Ponders why radars are mounted high up Ponders why the Germans had gyrocopters on submarines so that could see further Ponders why you see about 200 miles from the top of Mt Everest
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
another great video. I'm learning so much, unfortunately the biggest thing I'm learning is how little I knew before these videos keep up the great work.
@@gowdsake7103 They love using ancient texts, don't they? That is except when those ancient texts refute them which causes them to claim the ancient texts are fake. Pythagoras, Aristotle, and Eratosthones works must be fake because they all posit a globe.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
So you have 1 proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve? There should be millions of examples. Tony can't provide 1 proof of this. You two obviously have 1 proof to back up your belief?
Again I'm blown away by how much we know and the degree of precision. Some people use this this knowledge to make our world better/safer/easier, can't argue against that. Thank you Tony.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Even simpler is the fact that "level" only means the level of something, not that something is flat. So "sea level" is the level of the sea, (not a flat surface) cliff level is the level of the cliff you're standing on, flight level is the height your plane is travelling at, and so on. If flat Earters can't understand that, what hope do they have of understanding this video...
@@UncleKennysPlace Yes, of course, that is also a correct definition, but given that flat Earthers deny the very existence of gravity, they are unlikely to accept that as any kind of definition of "level" on a flat Eath...
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Ok, Tony. I came back and watched. I learned something (thanks) and flerfs? Well... they're sitting in their straight jackets drooling on themselves. LOL. 🤣
probably the most important point raised in this video is in reference to a Flat earther (to paraphrase); being a demented lunatic however as much as we can realize that we are all here maintaining the Data to back that assumption up. Look at the data and how that interlinks. As opposed to making delusional videos whilst gazing at alternate corners of the ceiling and waving hands around mystically. I wonder if some of these flat earthers sat in their science classes wearing their hat backwards declaring every lesson as "Thats stupid!"
This guy's just casually recording geophysics lectures and connecting it with a thread about owning flat earthers, I love it. Stay tuned for how different seismic arrival times disprove flat earth theory.
Gfg that precision is bananas. Doing carpentry I might sweat a sixteenth of an inch or a millimeter over 50-100 feet. Machinists normally get down to a thou or 3 or 4 over several inches. It's mind blowing that somebody might need 1.5 cm accuracy over entire Oceans. It's just nuts.
@@RichWoods23 10k is just the resolution. Tho I have no idea how it will be applied, the span of the accuracy might potentially be used over half the circumference of the, dare I say it, globe.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
@@reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 your knowledge is fantasy. You gotta stop worshipping disinformation actors like Tony. Here is the engineering problems faced when trying to account for curve on the London tunnel. Ordnance survey national grid reference system (bng) didn't work. They accounted for 20 cm per km due to the curvature of earth. Even by longitude and latitude by using spherical calculations they could be out by as much as 200 metres. As maps are flat the engineers trying use calculations of a spherical earth via a flat map. If this seems excessive than pop along to Greenwich and stand on the prime meridian, pulling out a Gps receiver it'll tell you your 102 metres to the east of the meridian because it uses a different mapping system to old paler maps Three different points where taken using three different coordinator system proven to be reliable. All three calculations contradicted curve on a flat map. All systems came up with different calculations. This is from Ian visits. Com . Uk
@@RichWoods23 round earth curvature according to curve calculator. 5 miles should be behind 16 feet of curve. 30 miles should be behind 600 feet of curve. There should be millions examples of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve. If what round earthers say is factual. There should be millions of examples of curve. Why can't round earthers provide proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve?
Thank you, PhD Tony. I followed what you described, knew a fair amount of it already but you went at least an order or two of magnitude on the specific details. I'm not complaining, I appreciate you going into that kind of depth (no sea-level pun intended!). I'm afraid a large number of Flat Earth believers won't understand your points, they're more likely to hear white noise type static instead.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
With such high level technology surely you can provide 1 proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve. There should be millions of examples. Surely round earthers can provide 1 proof of curve?
I would suggest that in reality, a "flatzoid" is the ethereal layer just above the physical surface of a billiard table, that constantly prevents me from ever shooting a perfect game... Cuz reasons.
I was really impressed with your debate tonight Tony. There are a litany of people with moderate intellect who are capable of arguing their position, in making a reasonable case using statistical data, and sound science. You are in a completely different league, and your ability to eloquently articulate scientific data, into digestable, portions for us normal persons, whom are uneducated on the topic is really impressive. Nathan seems like a good kid, just misguided, and I felt as if you were reaching him, and we were beginning to witness his entire paradigm shift, and that was exceedingly impressive. I understand it must be difficult to maintain a life, as well as create content, but I sincerely belive that you're doing the world disservice by not sharing your intellect on these highly complex topics, in a reasonable manner. Men like Austin are charlatans, whom profit off of the ignorance of others, and I feel as if he were to of been born in a differ era, he wouldn't be arguing the shape of the earth, he would be spearheading a Salem witch trial. I think this is why is important those that have the ability should help to educate the world, and I was just really impressed with your discussion
Indeed. What does "water at rest" even mean? I mean, water doesn't have the capability to just get up and move about under its own 'steam' (LOL), does it? No, it doesn't. Water is ALWAYS "at rest".
Levelling with globe-deniers in this fashion should surely leave them flat, Tony. Such emphatic arguments will no doubt turn the tide of knowledge. Maybe they will finally come to understand the gravity of their situation. I hope you had a ball doing this and with luck you’ve left them all at sea! 😁😁😁
I love it when PHD Tony does these, I always find them amusing, but that is a personal amusement, by the known sum of disdain PhD Tony carries for Ferfs. :) :)
I got a serious question about water pressure. So, for any fluid, there has to exist some equation of state: E(D,P,T) =0 relating D=density, P=pressure, T=temperature. Now, in my chemical engineering classes 38 years ago we went through the statistical mechanical model of an ideal gas as little spherical balls bouncing of a surface. The only two variables in that model are the SPEED of those balls, which give its TEMPERATURE, and HOW MANY of those balls there are in a given space to bounce off the surface, which gives its DENSITY. So, then, given T and D, automatically P should be fixed. But, now, start at the top of the ocean, and let's say T is near 0 Celsius. Now, go down ten kilometers. T doesn't change (much at all). D doesn't change (much at all): water is nearly incompressible. But P increases a THOUSANDS times. But how can that be when E(D,P,T)=0 constrains P to be fixed when D & T are fixed? What is the variable in the atomic model, therefore, that determines PRESSURE?
D does vary. Water is incompressible but salt water becomes more dense in response to colder temperatures. Density also increases with increased salinity. The distribution of salt within the oceans is not uniform.
I would also make the point that in a hydrostatically ordered fluid pressure is determined by the weight of overlying material and density and temperature have little alternative but to comply with what the pressure says.
@@PhDTony_original First, THANK you for responding! Ok... I mean, seriously... if all of earth's oceans were exactly as deep as they are now, but were made entirely out of pure distilled water, P = D*g*h+P0 would STILL roughly give us the pressure at a depth, h. Right? At h=0, P=P0 = 1 atm. At h=10km, P=1000 atm (or whatever), P(10km)=1000*P(0). So, what is the equation of state of water, relating D, T, P? It is CERTAINLY not the ideal gas law: P=R*D*T. D certainly doesn't increase by a factor of 1000. T certainly doesn't increase by a factor of 1000. Yet P DOES increase by a factor of 1000, with depth. And, again, at molecular level: all I see that would determine pressure would be how many particles in a given unit of time hit a hypothetical cross-sectional plane, which is covered by both density AND temperature. Temperatures covers their average speed. Density covers how many particles (if you froze the moment) touch that plane. I don't see a THIRD independent variable. Those two things - the "statistical" model at the molecular scale and the unknown equation of state - don't seem consistent with or don't seem to explain the very obvious & measured P=D*g*h+P0 pressure variation. Obviously I am missing something.
@@theultimatereductionist7592 the way I see it is that the water has a mass and it varies so slightly it can be considered the same at whatever depth, since its mass is "consistant" and it can create a pressure as it increases in depth ( 10 meters = approx 1 atm at sea level in pressure) so at 1000 meters down there is an additional 100 times atmospherical pressure applied... so at 1000m you get 1470 pounds of force per square inch on the item at that depth.
@@bunnykiller Thanks for your response, but not addressing my confusion. P=pressure D=density T=temperature Some equation (called equation of state) relates (i.e. FIXES) them: E(D,P,T)=0. How can P vary by order of a THOUSAND but D & T stay virtually constant? Unless the equation of state for water just happens to be: T=constant function of P and D or D=constant function of P and T That's my first source of confusion. Second is, defining pressure in terms of numbers of particles bouncing on a cross sectional area per unit time. Temperature tells you average particle velocity. Density tells you how many particles per unit volume (hence per unit cross sectional area). So if T (average velocity of particles) doesn't change, and D (# particles per cross sectional area), then what mechanism of those particles defines P (pressure) which varies by a factor of 1000 when you go 10km down?
A simple example is large ship testing tanks that have compensation curve on the towing rails of 80 mm Dels answer show me the engineering drawings Flerfs answer to this, space is fake
By mentioning the geoid, gravitation, equipotential, and satellites alone, you have lost most if not all flerfers. Although your analysis is very thorough, the average reaction of a flerfer will be predictable: nuh-uh.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Between you 3 surely you have 1 proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve. There should be millions of examples. If what round earthers say is factual. Why can't any of them provide live video footage of curve and the object that's dissapeared behind curve?
Flerf? Lunatic? Is it necessary to name-call? Just because someone *believes* something different, there's no need to call them derogatory names. It diminishes your intention. They may use names etc., but it's childish to lower yourself to respond in kind. If your intention is to reach out to them, a more respectful way could be found to connect with them. Otherwise, you're preaching to the converted. Thank you for the actual content of your video. Brilliant. No hate, please.
Is there a point where respectability is no longer applicable? Do you continue to respect a person who, through counter evidence you have provided, is willingly ignoring the evidence and still repeating their claim? What if they continue to claim quotes support their position even when shown the quote in context? It seems to me that respect is a two way street so if someone refuses to respect me by closing their mind to my argument then they have lost any respect I may have given. Most flat earth leaders ignore any counter evidence presented to their claims, ignore pointing to the context surrounding quotes they cherry-pick, and resort to ad hominem attacks instead of attacking the arguments against them. Many of their "flock" then take those same traits and spam the same misunderstandings all over. And, on the off chance they realize they might look bad, they aren't above nuking an entire comment thread to remove any well reasoned argument against them. Madmen are free to stand on the corner and shout whatever they want, but I don't think they need to be respected if they spit in the face of anyone who tries to make a reasoned argument against their belief.
Hey Tony. Just watched your debate with Chilli DeCastro. He is an attention seeking fool but you came off as an unhinged psycho. You should have taken your time and dismantled each of his demonstrably incorrect claims but you couldn’t keep your emotions in check. From a fellow academic maybe take some time to work on your presentations and try to remove emotion despite how infuriating your opponent is. Love your content. Keep it up.
Lie 1 from Tony. Ships dissapears behind curve. Here is evidence that If you zoom up to where the object dissapears. The object can always be brought back. th-cam.com/video/BrfFn-nZ3ns/w-d-xo.html I'll ask for atleast the 10 th time. Where can we see gravity in full effect?
I've made no less than four videos telling you how gravity is observed. At this point if you don't understand it, that's a you problem. Your "evidence" about zooming in on ships only applies to ships that haven't in fact gone over the horizon.
@@PhDTony_original so you have 0 evidence of gravity in full effect? I have atleast 5 videos debunking gravity. This video goes into extreme detail with experiments historical information and facts called the fall of gravity. th-cam.com/video/CbCGrG0c2gI/w-d-xo.html
@@PhDTony_original according to curve calculator. Ships should be behind 16 feet of curve at 5 miles. Just saying things doesn't make it factual. In this video it shows a sun disappearing over the horizon. zoom in it's just gone out of view. it shows sea below and behind it. it also shows the suns reflection on the water. th-cam.com/video/tPvwdn6Iodox/w-d-xo.htmlccf where is the footage of sun dissapearing over the horizon. zoom in with a drone to see curve and sun. All round earth footage of this never zooms up to where the object dissapears. They stay way back. If they zoomed up it would debunk round earth.
Now that you have put all the flerfs to sleep, can we pack them up in a Starship with all window seats, and no pressurization, so they both get to see the curve of the Earth, and gas pressure (not so) next to a vacuum? Just before they pass out and hope starship drops to an altitude with pressure and oxygen? I can see them now with their eyes glazed over and screaming at the monitor or smartphone, brought to partially by NASA. It's incredible to hear the same arguments after all that has been shown to them. Mentally ill seems the most prudent observation. "
Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy, Golgafrichan Ark Fleet Ship B…. The Golgafrinchan Ark Fleet Ship B was a way of removing the basically useless citizens from the planet of Golgafrincham. A variety of stories were formed about the doom of the planet, such as blowing up, crashing into the sun or being eaten by a mutant star goat. The ship was filled with all the middlemen of Golgafrincham, such as the telephone sanitisers, account executives, hairdressers, tired TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, flat earthers, public relations executives, and management consultants. Ark Fleet ships A and C were supposed to carry the people who ruled, thought, or actually did useful work. The ship was programmed to crash onto its designated planet, Earth. The captain remembers that he was told a good reason for this, but had forgotten it, although the reason was later revealed to be because the Ark Ship B Golgafrinchans were a 'bunch of useless idiots'.
1 Mycron is 1 / 1000mm or 0.001mm thats okay 1/1000 insh is = 0,0254mm soo 1/1000mm is 0.0244mm more accuret then 1/1000 Insh .. Again MilliMeter is SUPERIOR.. no wonder you can´t make tight fit..
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
That flerfs refuse to recognize this level of expertise is infuriating.
Same exact thought. They'd check out at the very first slide yelling conspiracy.
Are you serious? It's not surprising at all. It's not that they "refuse to recognize this level of expertise".. The problem is they CANT recognize it. These are a bunch of people who think brining a spirit level on an aircraft constitutes a meaningful scientific experiment. They simply lack the mental aptitude required to understand it(or anything for that matter)..
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" :)
@@uhohDavinci Nobody was surprised lol
@@uhohDavinci I think on some level it is a refusal. I'm sure most flerfs are expert a something. Suppose it is auto mechanics. They would take extreme umbrage if you told them lug nuts should be torqued to 50 in-lbs. To fail to exhibit reciprocal deference to expertise requires at least some degree of choice.
Many flerfs consider schools and universities as indoctrination centers instead of education.
No one has ever said, "I think I'll become a flat Earther". Thinking has nothing to do with it.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
The Great Trigonometric Survey of India should be required study. Measuring the altitude of Chomolungma to within 10 meters from "wet feet" in the 19th century is amazing.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Unfortunately flerfs will never watch this video. They'd rather stand on the beach and say it looks flat. So many fields of science are involved in researching this area I'd like to thank you for the clear abridged overview. Cheers
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
As always, Tony does not disappoint when driving a stake through the heart of stupidity and ignorance. This is very interesting and provides substantive evidence showing the water is not finding its own level and is definitely not flat by any means.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Please be the first round earth genius to provide 1 proof. Of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve.
Curve calculator says 5 miles should be behind 16 feet of curve.
We should be able to see millions of examples of curve.
Yet round earthers can't provide 1 proof.
Why not?
According to you your intelligence is a higher level. Than fake flat earth disinformation actors.
Most people common sense kicks in noones this dumb.
Another great video. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I wish I could sit and have a conversation with you because I'm sure I'd learn so much. I'm a land surveyor by trade and these flerfs are so ridiculous!
Still waiting for just one flerf to use a P1000 to bring a boat back that has gone COMPLETELY over the curve of earth. I guess I'll be waiting a while...
So many make the claim, even on a recent MCToon stream….but as for evidence 🤷♂️
Its a shame there are not more tall ships. Ponders why the crows nest is high
Ponders why radars are mounted high up
Ponders why the Germans had gyrocopters on submarines so that could see further
Ponders why you see about 200 miles from the top of Mt Everest
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Once again Tony beats a flerfs uh uh intellectual analysis of reality. Well done Tony.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
another great video.
I'm learning so much, unfortunately the biggest thing I'm learning is how little I knew before these videos
keep up the great work.
great video, clearly stated. I particularly liked your summary about Flerfs, thanks.
"Yeah, but it looks flat to me, so I WIN! Nur-nur!"
- Every flerf.
Flat Earther:- I didn't understand any of that, so it's fake.
That generally sums them up or muh iron age buk dum tole me so
@@gowdsake7103 They love using ancient texts, don't they? That is except when those ancient texts refute them which causes them to claim the ancient texts are fake. Pythagoras, Aristotle, and Eratosthones works must be fake because they all posit a globe.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
So you have 1 proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve?
There should be millions of examples.
Tony can't provide 1 proof of this. You two obviously have 1 proof to back up your belief?
@@Stopstalkingmenarokkurai Humber bridge ! TY now go back to sleep in mommy's basement
Flerfs will disregard all measurements that you didn't do yourself with a tape measure or stick. The second you said "satellite" they all checked out.
waiting to see if any flerfs even dare to respond to this with anything but denial.
Again I'm blown away by how much we know and the degree of precision. Some people use this this knowledge to make our world better/safer/easier, can't argue against that. Thank you Tony.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Always enjoy your closing remarks!
Even simpler is the fact that "level" only means the level of something, not that something is flat. So "sea level" is the level of the sea, (not a flat surface) cliff level is the level of the cliff you're standing on, flight level is the height your plane is travelling at, and so on. If flat Earters can't understand that, what hope do they have of understanding this video...
To me, "level" means _at right angles to the pull of gravity._
@@UncleKennysPlace Yes, of course, that is also a correct definition, but given that flat Earthers deny the very existence of gravity, they are unlikely to accept that as any kind of definition of "level" on a flat Eath...
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Ok, Tony. I came back and watched. I learned something (thanks) and flerfs? Well... they're sitting in their straight jackets drooling on themselves. LOL. 🤣
Those earlier satellites look like they were inspired by disco balls.
Thanks tony please keep these coming, I can feel myself getting smarter lol
probably the most important point raised in this video is in reference to a Flat earther (to paraphrase); being a demented lunatic however as much as we can realize that we are all here maintaining the Data to back that assumption up.
Look at the data and how that interlinks. As opposed to making delusional videos whilst gazing at alternate corners of the ceiling and waving hands around mystically. I wonder if some of these flat earthers sat in their science classes wearing their hat backwards declaring every lesson as "Thats stupid!"
Most flurfs think Sea level is the actual water surface. Mention tides to them and they run away.
This guy's just casually recording geophysics lectures and connecting it with a thread about owning flat earthers, I love it. Stay tuned for how different seismic arrival times disprove flat earth theory.
Gfg that precision is bananas. Doing carpentry I might sweat a sixteenth of an inch or a millimeter over 50-100 feet. Machinists normally get down to a thou or 3 or 4 over several inches. It's mind blowing that somebody might need 1.5 cm accuracy over entire Oceans. It's just nuts.
It's 1.5cm over a 10km square, which is still impressive.
@@RichWoods23 10k is just the resolution. Tho I have no idea how it will be applied, the span of the accuracy might potentially be used over half the circumference of the, dare I say it, globe.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
@@reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 your knowledge is fantasy. You gotta stop worshipping disinformation actors like Tony.
Here is the engineering problems faced when trying to account for curve on the London tunnel.
Ordnance survey national grid reference system (bng) didn't work.
They accounted for 20 cm per km due to the curvature of earth.
Even by longitude and latitude by using spherical calculations they could be out by as much as 200 metres. As maps are flat the engineers trying use calculations of a spherical earth via a flat map.
If this seems excessive than pop along to Greenwich and stand on the prime meridian, pulling out a Gps receiver it'll tell you your 102 metres to the east of the meridian because it uses a different mapping system to old paler maps
Three different points where taken using three different coordinator system proven to be reliable. All three calculations contradicted curve on a flat map. All systems came up with different calculations.
This is from Ian visits. Com . Uk
@@RichWoods23 round earth curvature according to curve calculator. 5 miles should be behind 16 feet of curve. 30 miles should be behind 600 feet of curve.
There should be millions examples of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve.
If what round earthers say is factual. There should be millions of examples of curve.
Why can't round earthers provide proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve?
Thank you, PhD Tony. I followed what you described, knew a fair amount of it already but you went at least an order or two of magnitude on the specific details. I'm not complaining, I appreciate you going into that kind of depth (no sea-level pun intended!).
I'm afraid a large number of Flat Earth believers won't understand your points, they're more likely to hear white noise type static instead.
Great video! Do one about celestial navigation?
I think Proto Thad is a great source for information on celestial navigation.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
But Tony! Holograms and the waters above and the waters below! And the elephants and turtle!
I had forgotten about the turtle
Don't forget Santo's electric vortex thing...
@@DarkStar-os9pv and witsit's electromagnetic wake
@@DarkStar-os9pvAnd don’t forget Santos is a vile deceitful grifter 😉
@@PhDTony_original It's turtles all the way down.
Well reasoned and factual.
Flerfs are just going to say it's all fake.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Thank you for this great explanation of the methods of gravity measurement!
Good stuff, thanks again for presenting it.
As a maritime officer I love these episodes! Thanks for all the science!
This level of technology is simply astounding to most people. . . Unfortunately, the technology of a spinning ball is enough to baffle a flerf 😂‼️⁉️
The technology of even a simple camera is too.
@@John.0z Isn’t that a snap judgement⁉️😉
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
@@kenroberts5768 Groan... 🤔
With such high level technology surely you can provide 1 proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve.
There should be millions of examples. Surely round earthers can provide 1 proof of curve?
Excellent, Tony!!!!
So Geoid is a shape....? What about Flatzoid??? 🤣🤣
I would suggest that in reality, a "flatzoid" is the ethereal layer just above the physical surface of a billiard table, that constantly prevents me from ever shooting a perfect game...
Cuz reasons.
@@DarkStar-os9pv 🤣🤣
Flatzoid is a density; really, really dense, duhhhhh
I was really impressed with your debate tonight Tony. There are a litany of people with moderate intellect who are capable of arguing their position, in making a reasonable case using statistical data, and sound science. You are in a completely different league, and your ability to eloquently articulate scientific data, into digestable, portions for us normal persons, whom are uneducated on the topic is really impressive. Nathan seems like a good kid, just misguided, and I felt as if you were reaching him, and we were beginning to witness his entire paradigm shift, and that was exceedingly impressive. I understand it must be difficult to maintain a life, as well as create content, but I sincerely belive that you're doing the world disservice by not sharing your intellect on these highly complex topics, in a reasonable manner. Men like Austin are charlatans, whom profit off of the ignorance of others, and I feel as if he were to of been born in a differ era, he wouldn't be arguing the shape of the earth, he would be spearheading a Salem witch trial. I think this is why is important those that have the ability should help to educate the world, and I was just really impressed with your discussion
Do you have anywhere that you take inquires?
On discord servers. People have also found my email addresses online.
@@PhDTony_original what's your discord handle?
Hey Tony, not seen you on youtube for a while, hope all is well. Will you be doing more content/debates in the future?
Didn't understand anything , but fell asleep beautifully 😁👍‼️
No wonder you lose your temper sometimes when dealing with flerfs.
Thank you, Tony. We'll done.
Flatzoid is the exact shape of failure.
Well done Tony!👍
Ok. I'm going to have to watch that again to make sure I follow. 😂 Thanks Tony!
I applaud their nonsense of "Water Finds its Level" as if it is alive, ever wonder why it levels off in your Glass...GRAVITY!
Indeed. What does "water at rest" even mean? I mean, water doesn't have the capability to just get up and move about under its own 'steam' (LOL), does it? No, it doesn't.
Water is ALWAYS "at rest".
Thanks PhD Tony.
Levelling with globe-deniers in this fashion should surely leave them flat, Tony. Such emphatic arguments will no doubt turn the tide of knowledge. Maybe they will finally come to understand the gravity of their situation. I hope you had a ball doing this and with luck you’ve left them all at sea! 😁😁😁
I love it when PHD Tony does these, I always find them amusing, but that is a personal amusement, by the known sum of disdain PhD Tony carries for Ferfs. :) :)
Happy new year PhD Tony!!
Flatzoid will destroy this video with his unusually expert brilliance
Poor Failzoid actually thinks we take him seriously lol.
I am gonna watch from beginning
Awesome, thanks Tony!
I got a serious question about water pressure. So, for any fluid, there has to exist some equation of state:
E(D,P,T) =0 relating D=density, P=pressure, T=temperature. Now, in my chemical engineering classes 38 years ago
we went through the statistical mechanical model of an ideal gas as little spherical balls bouncing of a surface.
The only two variables in that model are the SPEED of those balls, which give its TEMPERATURE,
and HOW MANY of those balls there are in a given space to bounce off the surface, which gives its DENSITY.
So, then, given T and D, automatically P should be fixed.
But, now, start at the top of the ocean, and let's say T is near 0 Celsius. Now, go down ten kilometers.
T doesn't change (much at all). D doesn't change (much at all): water is nearly incompressible.
But P increases a THOUSANDS times. But how can that be when E(D,P,T)=0 constrains P to be fixed when D & T are fixed?
What is the variable in the atomic model, therefore, that determines PRESSURE?
D does vary. Water is incompressible but salt water becomes more dense in response to colder temperatures. Density also increases with increased salinity. The distribution of salt within the oceans is not uniform.
I would also make the point that in a hydrostatically ordered fluid pressure is determined by the weight of overlying material and density and temperature have little alternative but to comply with what the pressure says.
@@PhDTony_original First, THANK you for responding!
Ok... I mean, seriously... if all of earth's oceans were exactly as deep as they are now, but were made entirely out of pure distilled water, P = D*g*h+P0 would STILL roughly give us the pressure at a depth, h. Right? At h=0, P=P0 = 1 atm. At h=10km, P=1000 atm (or whatever), P(10km)=1000*P(0).
So, what is the equation of state of water, relating D, T, P? It is CERTAINLY not the ideal gas law:
P=R*D*T. D certainly doesn't increase by a factor of 1000. T certainly doesn't increase by a factor of 1000.
Yet P DOES increase by a factor of 1000, with depth.
And, again, at molecular level: all I see that would determine pressure would be how many particles in a given unit of time hit a hypothetical cross-sectional plane, which is covered by both density AND temperature. Temperatures covers their average speed. Density covers how many particles (if you froze the moment) touch that plane. I don't see a THIRD independent variable.
Those two things - the "statistical" model at the molecular scale and the unknown equation of state - don't seem consistent with or don't seem to explain the very obvious & measured P=D*g*h+P0 pressure variation.
Obviously I am missing something.
@@theultimatereductionist7592 the way I see it is that the water has a mass and it varies so slightly it can be considered the same at whatever depth, since its mass is "consistant" and it can create a pressure as it increases in depth ( 10 meters = approx 1 atm at sea level in pressure) so at 1000 meters down there is an additional 100 times atmospherical pressure applied... so at 1000m you get 1470 pounds of force per square inch on the item at that depth.
@@bunnykiller Thanks for your response, but not addressing my confusion.
P=pressure
D=density
T=temperature
Some equation (called equation of state) relates (i.e. FIXES) them: E(D,P,T)=0.
How can P vary by order of a THOUSAND but D & T stay virtually constant?
Unless the equation of state for water just happens to be: T=constant function of P and D
or D=constant function of P and T
That's my first source of confusion.
Second is, defining pressure in terms of numbers of particles bouncing on a cross sectional area per unit time. Temperature tells you average particle velocity. Density tells you how many particles per unit volume (hence per unit cross sectional area). So if T (average velocity of particles) doesn't change,
and D (# particles per cross sectional area), then what mechanism of those particles defines P (pressure) which varies by a factor of 1000 when you go 10km down?
Flat? Water is not even even. Because the gravity is not even.
What is the greatest inclination between the oblate spheroid and the geoid?
A simple example is large ship testing tanks that have compensation curve on the towing rails of 80 mm
Dels answer show me the engineering drawings
Flerfs answer to this, space is fake
I'm not trying to deprogram flat earthers so much as educate my viewers.
@@PhDTony_original You do well. Spent 2 years in the RN measuring gravity, magnetic survey and side scans
By mentioning the geoid, gravitation, equipotential, and satellites alone, you have lost most if not all flerfers. Although your analysis is very thorough, the average reaction of a flerfer will be predictable: nuh-uh.
I'm not trying to deprogram flat earthers so much as educate my viewers.
@@PhDTony_original I'm an optimist who hopes, while educating one, in the meantime changing the mind of another. I know, I'm hopeless.
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.
Between you 3 surely you have 1 proof of mountains buildings bridges cities and seas on various angles due to curve.
There should be millions of examples. If what round earthers say is factual.
Why can't any of them provide live video footage of curve and the object that's dissapeared behind curve?
Hi
Flerf? Lunatic? Is it necessary to name-call? Just because someone *believes* something different, there's no need to call them derogatory names. It diminishes your intention. They may use names etc., but it's childish to lower yourself to respond in kind.
If your intention is to reach out to them, a more respectful way could be found to connect with them. Otherwise, you're preaching to the converted.
Thank you for the actual content of your video. Brilliant.
No hate, please.
Bollocks they are wilfully ignorant and should be treated as such !
Nothing wrong with 'flerf'. They call us sane people 'glerf', so...
@@ReValveiT_01 I prefer flattard
Is there a point where respectability is no longer applicable? Do you continue to respect a person who, through counter evidence you have provided, is willingly ignoring the evidence and still repeating their claim? What if they continue to claim quotes support their position even when shown the quote in context? It seems to me that respect is a two way street so if someone refuses to respect me by closing their mind to my argument then they have lost any respect I may have given.
Most flat earth leaders ignore any counter evidence presented to their claims, ignore pointing to the context surrounding quotes they cherry-pick, and resort to ad hominem attacks instead of attacking the arguments against them. Many of their "flock" then take those same traits and spam the same misunderstandings all over. And, on the off chance they realize they might look bad, they aren't above nuking an entire comment thread to remove any well reasoned argument against them.
Madmen are free to stand on the corner and shout whatever they want, but I don't think they need to be respected if they spit in the face of anyone who tries to make a reasoned argument against their belief.
@@Tsudico The perfect example here was Rachie so many people took so much time and she was na na na na
Hey Tony. Just watched your debate with Chilli DeCastro. He is an attention seeking fool but you came off as an unhinged psycho. You should have taken your time and dismantled each of his demonstrably incorrect claims but you couldn’t keep your emotions in check. From a fellow academic maybe take some time to work on your presentations and try to remove emotion despite how infuriating your opponent is. Love your content. Keep it up.
Thanks for the feedback.
I think Tony blocked me, all his comments are hidden :0
ov vey!
You're delusional
Why dont you make a video about how flerfs lie about how tsunami waves should wrap around antarctica 😂😂
I have, I will air it soon.
@@PhDTony_original the earth is flat tony go look over the horizon with binoculars/camera whatever you want bud
@@zagresky6211 amazingly we have developed more accurate, sensitive and reliable observational instruments than binoculars and telescopes.
And amazingly we can see past your "geometric horizon"
@@zagresky6211 yes, due to refractive effects.
Satellites? You mean satelloons? Because, flat earthers on't accept satellites to be real...
That's a new name for flerfs, that is. Satelloons ... 🤣
I still haven't seen anyone who believes in satelloons to plot the course they travel and determine whether a balloon can match the course.
Lie 1 from Tony. Ships dissapears behind curve.
Here is evidence that If you zoom up to where the object dissapears. The object can always be brought back.
th-cam.com/video/BrfFn-nZ3ns/w-d-xo.html
I'll ask for atleast the 10 th time. Where can we see gravity in full effect?
I've made no less than four videos telling you how gravity is observed. At this point if you don't understand it, that's a you problem.
Your "evidence" about zooming in on ships only applies to ships that haven't in fact gone over the horizon.
@@PhDTony_original so you have 0 evidence of gravity in full effect?
I have atleast 5 videos debunking gravity.
This video goes into extreme detail with experiments historical information and facts called the fall of gravity.
th-cam.com/video/CbCGrG0c2gI/w-d-xo.html
@@PhDTony_original according to curve calculator. Ships should be behind 16 feet of curve at 5 miles.
Just saying things doesn't make it factual.
In this video it shows a sun disappearing over the horizon. zoom in it's just gone out of view.
it shows sea below and behind it. it also shows the suns reflection on the water.
th-cam.com/video/tPvwdn6Iodox/w-d-xo.htmlccf
where is the footage of sun dissapearing over the horizon. zoom in with a drone to see curve and sun.
All round earth footage of this never zooms up to where the object dissapears. They stay way back. If they zoomed up it would debunk round earth.
@@Stopstalkingmenarokkurai You're babbling idiotically again. Stop it.
The fact the sun sets at all is evidence the Earth cannot be flat.
@@Stopstalkingmenarokkurai also the distance at which a ship becomes obscured by the horizon depends on both the height of the ship and the observer
Reification of gravity. Loggical fallacy. Water is always level fren.
We can put a GPS receiver on a ship and show that water is not flat. As I discussed in the video.
@@PhDTony_original wow no way
@@TugboatGoBrrr nuh uh!
@draco2k729 "official narrative" beep boop 🤖
Now that you have put all the flerfs to sleep, can we pack them up in a Starship with all window seats, and no pressurization, so they both get to see the curve of the Earth, and gas pressure (not so) next to a vacuum? Just before they pass out and hope starship drops to an altitude with pressure and oxygen? I can see them now with their eyes glazed over and screaming at the monitor or smartphone, brought to partially by NASA. It's incredible to hear the same arguments after all that has been shown to them. Mentally ill seems the most prudent observation.
"
Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy, Golgafrichan Ark Fleet Ship B….
The Golgafrinchan Ark Fleet Ship B was a way of removing the basically useless citizens from the planet of Golgafrincham. A variety of stories were formed about the doom of the planet, such as blowing up, crashing into the sun or being eaten by a mutant star goat. The ship was filled with all the middlemen of Golgafrincham, such as the telephone sanitisers, account executives, hairdressers, tired TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, flat earthers, public relations executives, and management consultants.
Ark Fleet ships A and C were supposed to carry the people who ruled, thought, or actually did useful work.
The ship was programmed to crash onto its designated planet, Earth. The captain remembers that he was told a good reason for this, but had forgotten it, although the reason was later revealed to be because the Ark Ship B Golgafrinchans were a 'bunch of useless idiots'.
1 Mycron is 1 / 1000mm or 0.001mm thats okay
1/1000 insh is = 0,0254mm soo 1/1000mm is
0.0244mm more accuret then 1/1000 Insh ..
Again MilliMeter is SUPERIOR.. no wonder you can´t make
tight fit..
We didn't evolve from monkeys on a non consistent cartoon ball seeing the same stars and constellations since the dawn of man where sea level is called sea level for a reason where the north star is stationary. Not including the false equation for curvature eight inches per mile squared doesn't fit into the 24901 mile circumference. Nobody believes in make believe, water pools, Hollywood and cgi. Freemasonry and secret societies exist in every nation.