I hope it will help a bit. After all, crowds on streets are like bulls - easily triggered by colour. Or so the common knowledge says. In theory uniform ban should show that we are all the same after all. But I do not have high hopes. I am sure commies and nazis will find a way to identify themselves.
Not when you single out a particular group like in the way Prussia and Baden did. I daresay you can see similar cases in America and across Europe where right wing populists are often individually targeted in a similar vein (Trump’s court cases, comments made by party members and leaders being massively publicised in the press etc). At best, I don’t think it draws people away and at worst, it can easily increase support, particularly if public confidence in the organisations pushing for these measures isn’t good.
It wasn't uniforms that were brawling in the streets, it was the goons in the uniforms. If they didn't have uniforms, they'd just find some other marker of difference (banners, flags, placards...) to identify sides.
Covering the Boxing situation is an absolutely phenomenal shift of gears in this series. The Sprt of Boxing was the biggest sport in the World at that time...... Everyone on the planet knew who the Heavyweight to of the World was. Plus later on down the road , The Schmelling vs.Joe Luis was the biggest sporting event in the history of the United States at that time.
I don't think this series will cover that rivalry, unfortunately since that happens after Hitler came to power. But its worth looking up, especially the life of Max Schmelling.
Fucking hell, listening to the communist and nazi newspapers is sometimes unbearable, these people are just never happy unless they completely and utterly get their way and only their way
Nope because of all the group mentioned, only one of them is for maintaining democracy so that there is power in the hands of the electorate. That would be the Democrats.
I looked up Max Schmeling and he lived until the age of 99, passing away in 2005, being the longest lived heavyweight champion in history. Considering the number of blows to the head they take, that is some accomplishment. Schmeling secretly saved 2 Jewish children in 1938, and after the war, worked for the Coca-Cola Company. By the way, if you haven't seen it you must see the 1961 film "One, Two, Three", a comedy where James Cagney plays the head of the Coca-Cola bottling plant in West Berlin. The funniest cold way film I know of.
The Ministry of Finance Paul Moldenhauer left offices the 20th due to his policy not being approved by the DVP. But i have not found what his economic policy was ...
❤ i love you guys. Wether or not banning the uniform the right to do or even done with good intentions. It was used to great advantage by the party to stir outrage and prove a point whether they truly believed it or not.
In the 1920s there was a temporary ban on Hitler making speeches. This was after he was released from Landsberg prison. So the recently re-legalised NSDAP issued a poster of him with tape across his mouth and the word _Redeverbot_ on the tape which means "speech ban". The poster stated that there was only one man in the whole of Germany who could not make a speech.
They must have had much more accurate news reporting back then. For example, the Vossische Zeitung newspaper headline @7:47 says, "TimeGhost ist Zeitgeist".
I know this may be a bit left field but I have always been intrigued by the Reichsbanner Schwartz, Rot, Gold. There is very little about them in English. Could you maybe do an episode about them.
They tended to be a bit older than their KPD and NSDAP counterparts. The lack of coverage of them may reflect the possibility that the SPD was a little embarrassed at needing a paramilitary group at all.
an idea worth considering! They are for sure interesting, maybe Ill find a place to add a bit more context one of these weeks, maybe comparing SA, Rote Front, and reichsbanner!
15:05 The ban on the uniforms... or at least the situation in which this is being proposed is just amazing. Nowadays you would compare it to a political gang war where the Communists and SA will attack each other randomly on sight throughout Germany. But then, the fact that they would then be banned in several states at the same time (and 2 of them deliberately targetting the Nazi party), and apparently by several different parties: Christian Democrats, SPD and the Zentrum, indicates that there was a consensus on the danger. And it gets more wide-reaching with symbols ban.... (were the Nazis appealing to courts against this decision?) Spartacus' reading of the Völkischer Beobachter... just classic.
Germans tended to have an exaggerated respect for uniforms, and attempting to stop political paramilitaries from wearing them was designed to make their organisations less appealing. Later on, in the Third Reich in which uniforms of one kind or another were very common, it was joked that the best way to stand out in a crowd was to wear civilian clothes.
Watching this series is rather uncomfortable as we seem to see this same thing happening today, 100 years later with upheaval in the Coalition government and the people of Saxony leaning very far right, embracing the AFD.
Contemporary comparisons to nazism just look slanderous regardless if they are left or right. The AfD, or the American Republicans or Democrats, Russia, Israel, Ukraine or anyone else in the modern world are different from the NSDAP despite how convenient it is to say the opposite for their detractors.
If Indy was talking about Pro Wrestling, there were World Heavyweight Champions before 1930. Carl Gotch and George Hakenschmidt wrestled in 1908 for the first Professional Wrestling World Heavyweight championship. That lineage is claimed today by the National Wrestling Alliance. Though that claim is dubious at best.
The title that traces its way back to the early 1900’s is defunct. It was last called the World Heavyweight Championship and was one of WWE’s 2 recognized world titles. Its lineage ended I believe in about 2013 or so when it was unified with the WWE Championship.
@@yojoeski As with all things in Pro Wrestling, it’s more complicated than that, and it involves politics. It feels like we’re the kids in the back of class messing around, while Sparty and Indy try to teach us something important.
Rematch? Nah. Instead, I think Schmelling should fight that up-and-coming Joe Louis. I bet that'd be a heck of a fight! (Yes I know Louis wasn't boxing yet. Hush, we're having fun!)
SA members paraded in white shirts and dark neckties and trousers, and ridiculed the ban, for example with a banner saying "Sheep bleat and cattle laugh because shirts are dangerous to the state!"
Besides political uniforms, other ways of course existed to nail political colours to the mast, for example lapel badges. In early 1933, a mathematics and physics student named *Klaus Fuchs* was travelling on a train to Berlin when he read in a newspaper about the Reichstag fire. He guessed this meant opposition parties would be banned, certainly the KPD, to which he belonged. Fuchs removed the hammer and sickle lapel badge he was wearing. Later that year he emigrated to Britain.
Keep up the good work, it's very important for history and people to understand how Hitler came to power. Many are fast to conclude that the people were forced into it or just stupid to allow Hitler into power..
Should freedom of speech be extended to people who use that freedom to advocate an end to free speech? Curious what a responsible community like this one will think.
Absolutely. Individuals' freedom of speech is (or should be) nearly absolute. If we or the government can simply dictate who does and does not carry it, and more broadly whose beliefs are acceptable and whose are not, then it completely ceases to exist.
@ I see. What about someone who is calling for violent overthrow of the government? Or advocating ripping up the constitution and the bill of rights? Last, what about if they propose those things, and also that an ‘apartheid’ system should be set up in the US?
Principles aside, would restricting extremist speech solve anything in the first place? A free society can only feasibly restrict the speech of relatively fringe communities, that, due to their small size, aren't really a threat to the established constitutional order. Meanwhile, more popular extremist groups will learn how to act within the confines of what the law permits, and may even actively exploit the restrictions placed upon their speech to gain more support (they validate their anti-establishment bona fides, for example). Or, if such groups are large enough, restricting extremist speech may be directly contrary to basic democratic principles, because you'd be excluding a significant portion of the population from the political process.
@@pathutchison7688 so? There's no danger in someone expressing their opinion. Tens of thousands of people in the United States already advocate for doing those things publicly almost every day.
Schlonterweich trubelnd in einem froschtaufel flatzwerig bei dem bummsteller pfupfeln schnargenzapfend! Exactly the news that's is in the papers nowadays! 🤣
Looking ahead towards our modern era, it's hard not to see parallels. The attempts to constantly split people into "us" vs. "them". I can really appreciate why modern moderates constantly attempt to pull people back together. Is it the solution? Maybe a hundred years from now TimeGhost 2100 can look back and tell us.
Golden Greek aka Jim Londos. Still the single biggest draw in recorded pro wrestling. Bigger than Hogan, Flair, Austin, Cena, or anyone else you care to name.
No disrespect to Sharkey, I'm a firm believer that Schmeling sweeping him is a huge fluke and robs Sharkey of truly accomplishing what he's capable of. I've spent the last few days in pure disbelief and it just doesn't make sense to me. I've spent the entire regular season watching Jack Sharkey play great boxing it's just not fair. If Sharkey loses again I will face that Schmeling deserved the win, but I am just 100% sure it was a fluke and does a big disservice to Sharkey and The National Boxing Association
I kinda agree with you on this. If only there was some sort of way to instantly replay recent events in the match, we could see this alleged 'low blow' that sent Schmeling down. I wonder what it was?
he is president as you said and he does not belong to a specific party but definitely has political leanings towards the right, comprised of conservatives and monarchists, basically the parties that are not convicted democrats!
This is the first episode of this series that I have seen. Interesting graphics! That video within a newspaper is cool. I will have to watch more. I wonder if the time will come when you, or someone else, makes a series about the rise of fascism in the United States. Within four days of the election results being known, masked men with nazi flags demonstrated outside a performance of The Diary of Ann Frank in Howell, Michigan. They then moved to Fowlerville, where they told a witness, "This is now Pureville." (It was local and national news.) A friend showed me a picture of a literature drop by a white supremacist group in Ames, Iowa, a college town. And we ain't seen nothin' yet, have we? (Btw, my father was in tank and truck repair in Europe in 1944 and 45.)
The rise of fascism on the US? Who's directing it? The what, 2 dozen Nazis LARPers? You should be more concerned about a certain political party announcing that they'll form a "shadow government" to thwart the incoming, democratically elected (with a popular vote mandate) administration.
@@theswampcleaner3856annoyingly enough, TH-cam is not deleting your replies, so your agitprop drivel is now posted thrice under this comment 🙄. Well done getting heating up that tinfoil hat for nothing though.
@@spartacus-olsson agitprop? Oh really? I wasn't the one fear mongering over some dumb LARPers running around with swastikas. Let me guess, you're unaware that Democrat congressmen proposed, on the house floor, to have a shadow government set up to stymy the upcoming administration. You know, REAL issues. Not idiots goose stepping all over the place. And FYI TH-cam isn't showing me my replies. And since it's a well known fact that TH-cam uses AI to scrub comment sections, that's what I assumed happened. But thank you for letting me know that they're still there. (which I just rectified)
@@spartacus-olsson I would gladly delete any duplicates if I could actually see them... UPDATE!!! I figured it out. I had to go into my google activity to find the dup replies. I removed all except for my original.
Okay, the (at least my) answers to the questions: *Will the banning of Nazi uniforms calm the streets? Hell no. As any good GenXer will tell you the one surefire way to make someone want something is to ban it or make it illegal! *Will Breuning pull a rabbit out of his hat? Again, Hell no. It's still the same problem, and trying round three of the same solution isn't going to get anyone anywhere. *Is the liberation of the Rhineland a cause for celebration? No, not really. It'll be a matter of who swoops in the take political control of the liberated area that will matter, not the liberation itself. *Does Schmelling deserve to keep the title? Yes. A win because your opponent cheated is still a win. *Will the Nazi success story spread to other states? God, I hope not, those guys give me the creeps.
Guys, love ya to death, your passion and commitment to presenting these historical stories is great, but you each are distracting with your movements when the other is speaking. *AND* most importantly, you each at a couple occasions were mouthing the other persons' lines. Don't do that. Please. There I said please, so please don't do that. Thanks. Excelsior, etc, etc.
@@spartacus-olsson Who knows but now I want the answer. I mean was it understood, looked down upon or were some even tried? Or is this a common denier dogwhistle to ask like asking about how the doors were wooden or something like that?
Do you think banning uniforms helps with political unrest? Discuss in the comments!
I have a feeling no.
I hope it will help a bit. After all, crowds on streets are like bulls - easily triggered by colour. Or so the common knowledge says. In theory uniform ban should show that we are all the same after all.
But I do not have high hopes. I am sure commies and nazis will find a way to identify themselves.
Not when you single out a particular group like in the way Prussia and Baden did. I daresay you can see similar cases in America and across Europe where right wing populists are often individually targeted in a similar vein (Trump’s court cases, comments made by party members and leaders being massively publicised in the press etc). At best, I don’t think it draws people away and at worst, it can easily increase support, particularly if public confidence in the organisations pushing for these measures isn’t good.
Gotta try something
It wasn't uniforms that were brawling in the streets, it was the goons in the uniforms. If they didn't have uniforms, they'd just find some other marker of difference (banners, flags, placards...) to identify sides.
I forgot the timeline reset and was about to say "IN *ONLY* THREE STATES??" thinking this was post-war.
Hehe might as well be. Those Fs very well wore them during the civil rights movement.
Nope, they rebooted the franchise, and recast the characters.
In 2024, you'd expect to see a headline about wearing Brownshirt uniforms being made mandatory in at least 3 states.
@@Julianna.Domina
🤨 Not “funny.”
Not “funny” at all…
th-cam.com/video/1QswT4pC0ao/w-d-xo.htmlsi=dnBcjc_n_J2Ngscc
@@Julianna.Domina
Not “funny.”
i love how all the papers have different voices, perfect! love the videos
You guys are having way too much fun making these.
Indy's been having fun like this since 1914
As they should, to do this stuff for a living has got to be any history buff’s dream job.
“Back in 1876… Remember that?” Wow, these guys have been around for a long time!
So was Indy mentored by journalists who reports on the Franco-Prussian War? 😉
I follow indy's work since 1914, at least. 🤣
"Brown shirts have been banned, Heinrich. What should we do?"
"Let's switch to black."
Great series. Another excellent TimeGhost production.
Much appreciated Cliff!
hearing indy's silly newspaper voices leaking into the main episodes from time to time brings me joy
Covering the Boxing situation is an absolutely phenomenal shift of gears in this series. The Sprt of Boxing was the biggest sport in the World at that time...... Everyone on the planet knew who the Heavyweight to of the World was. Plus later on down the road , The Schmelling vs.Joe Luis was the biggest sporting event in the history of the United States at that time.
I don't think this series will cover that rivalry, unfortunately since that happens after Hitler came to power. But its worth looking up, especially the life of Max Schmelling.
@@kaieastwood3373They were good friends after World War II until Louis’ death
Yes! Banning uniforms will solve the whole problem. It's obvious. If we can't see it, it's not there. Genius!
Fucking hell, listening to the communist and nazi newspapers is sometimes unbearable, these people are just never happy unless they completely and utterly get their way and only their way
Sound a lot like Republicans and Democrats.
Yeah sounds familiar eh?
Nope because of all the group mentioned, only one of them is for maintaining democracy so that there is power in the hands of the electorate. That would be the Democrats.
It's the classic "whoever wins, we lose"
@@scottjuhnke6825 more like republicans and bernie bros
This series has started so incredibly well. Standards just keep goin up.
Thanks for the lovely comment.
yo this is fire good work
Thanks for the comment!
I looked up Max Schmeling and he lived until the age of 99, passing away in 2005, being the longest lived heavyweight champion in history. Considering the number of blows to the head they take, that is some accomplishment. Schmeling secretly saved 2 Jewish children in 1938, and after the war, worked for the Coca-Cola Company. By the way, if you haven't seen it you must see the 1961 film "One, Two, Three", a comedy where James Cagney plays the head of the Coca-Cola bottling plant in West Berlin. The funniest cold way film I know of.
If I remember right, his boxing manager was also Jewish and Schmeling used his fame to keep that guy safe as well.
The Ministry of Finance Paul Moldenhauer left offices the 20th due to his policy not being approved by the DVP. But i have not found what his economic policy was ...
The tax reforms we spoke of.
@@spartacus-olssonWhat's the name/brand of your glass frames?
@ it’s a local brand here in the Munich area. They’re 3d printed.
YOU GUYS ARE FANTASTIC!! All your shows are AMAZING and VERY, VERY, Knowledgeable!!
❤ i love you guys. Wether or not banning the uniform the right to do or even done with good intentions. It was used to great advantage by the party to stir outrage and prove a point whether they truly believed it or not.
In the 1920s there was a temporary ban on Hitler making speeches. This was after he was released from Landsberg prison. So the recently re-legalised NSDAP issued a poster of him with tape across his mouth and the word _Redeverbot_ on the tape which means "speech ban". The poster stated that there was only one man in the whole of Germany who could not make a speech.
the parallels are getting stronger.
They must have had much more accurate news reporting back then. For example, the Vossische Zeitung newspaper headline @7:47 says, "TimeGhost ist Zeitgeist".
Another smashing episode!
I know this may be a bit left field but I have always been intrigued by the Reichsbanner Schwartz, Rot, Gold. There is very little about them in English. Could you maybe do an episode about them.
They tended to be a bit older than their KPD and NSDAP counterparts. The lack of coverage of them may reflect the possibility that the SPD was a little embarrassed at needing a paramilitary group at all.
an idea worth considering! They are for sure interesting, maybe Ill find a place to add a bit more context one of these weeks, maybe comparing SA, Rote Front, and reichsbanner!
I can second interest in a dedicated episode about the Reichsbanner or the Rotefront
Don’t mean to be pedantic but you wrote “Schwartz” whilst you meant to write “Schwarz” (remove the T).
The talk about heavyweights at the start made me think you were referring to the ridiculous Tyson vs Paul fight.
That one was as uninteresting as I expected. I found it kind of sad really.
At least the old fella got his paycheck.
Great video!
really good series hope u guys keep it going
We will!
Can we get Boxing Week by Week next? Just imagine Indy talking about the Fight of the Century!
Plot twist: He talks about Jim Jeffries and Jack Johnson.
@ you know Jack Johnson was the real deal, when Muhammad Ali said “I’m Bold, but he was Crazy.”
Thank you for the lesson.
When Indy and Sparty are reading the Nazi and Communist newspapers sometimes I wonder if they aren't actually acting. I love this content.
Love hearing Indy’s strange southern accent come out some!
Taking a moment to compliment this excellent set. Danke.
Danke! Glad to hear you like it.
Sahara and tan 😂😂 love you guys over at TimeGhost
Thank you.
4:20 "Time Ghost ist Zeigeist." No truer words have been spoken!
Nice spot, there's a few more scattered around too! Thanks for watching.
Well done thank you
TimeGhost ist Zeitgeist
8:20
How will Hugo Boss ever recover from this?
“We have a heavyweight boxing champion”
Interesting timing there Indy
And purely by accident- just following the major headlines of 1930 as they unfold.
@Southsideindy It’s The real Indy 😳
It's always nice when they let Indy put in some sports fun facts. I bet a lot get cut.
Excelsior...
EXCELSIOR!
15:05
The ban on the uniforms... or at least the situation in which this is being proposed is just amazing.
Nowadays you would compare it to a political gang war where the Communists and SA will attack each other randomly on sight throughout Germany.
But then, the fact that they would then be banned in several states at the same time (and 2 of them deliberately targetting the Nazi party), and apparently by several different parties: Christian Democrats, SPD and the Zentrum, indicates that there was a consensus on the danger. And it gets more wide-reaching with symbols ban.... (were the Nazis appealing to courts against this decision?)
Spartacus' reading of the Völkischer Beobachter... just classic.
Germans tended to have an exaggerated respect for uniforms, and attempting to stop political paramilitaries from wearing them was designed to make their organisations less appealing. Later on, in the Third Reich in which uniforms of one kind or another were very common, it was joked that the best way to stand out in a crowd was to wear civilian clothes.
at 12:03 why did I sense Astrid grinning in enjoyment? lol
8:30 I am not a specialist of the pre-ww2 French medias, but "Le Temps" is nowadays a swiss newspaper (from Geneva I think), not a French one.
Such language has never been heard in People's Party meetings- and certainly not in that accent.
"Stock market bandits", he's not wrong.
Great, another episode.
Thanks for watching!
Watching this series is rather uncomfortable as we seem to see this same thing happening today, 100 years later with upheaval in the Coalition government and the people of Saxony leaning very far right, embracing the AFD.
Yeah cuz there’s no context to the rise of the AFD. Just people being bad ya know.
Contemporary comparisons to nazism just look slanderous regardless if they are left or right. The AfD, or the American Republicans or Democrats, Russia, Israel, Ukraine or anyone else in the modern world are different from the NSDAP despite how convenient it is to say the opposite for their detractors.
1930: we got a new heavy weight champion.
2024: some 27 year old boxer beat a 58 year old one.
I'm loving this series!
That's one giant old phone. Sparty uses it to stop Indy nicking his sweets😅
If Indy was talking about Pro Wrestling, there were World Heavyweight Champions before 1930.
Carl Gotch and George Hakenschmidt wrestled in 1908 for the first Professional Wrestling World Heavyweight championship. That lineage is claimed today by the National Wrestling Alliance. Though that claim is dubious at best.
How did you manage to post your comment 9 hrs ago when the video came five minutes ago?🤷
@@Machete-o2h Wrestling Facts are beyond the limits of such silly things as Time and Space.
The title that traces its way back to the early 1900’s is defunct. It was last called the World Heavyweight Championship and was one of WWE’s 2 recognized world titles. Its lineage ended I believe in about 2013 or so when it was unified with the WWE Championship.
@@yojoeski As with all things in Pro Wrestling, it’s more complicated than that, and it involves politics.
It feels like we’re the kids in the back of class messing around, while Sparty and Indy try to teach us something important.
Hugo Boss has entered the chat.
Rematch? Nah. Instead, I think Schmelling should fight that up-and-coming Joe Louis. I bet that'd be a heck of a fight!
(Yes I know Louis wasn't boxing yet. Hush, we're having fun!)
This guy Joe Louis sounds promising. I wonder what kind of career he will have?
SA members paraded in white shirts and dark neckties and trousers, and ridiculed the ban, for example with a banner saying "Sheep bleat and cattle laugh because shirts are dangerous to the state!"
Besides political uniforms, other ways of course existed to nail political colours to the mast, for example lapel badges. In early 1933, a mathematics and physics student named *Klaus Fuchs* was travelling on a train to Berlin when he read in a newspaper about the Reichstag fire. He guessed this meant opposition parties would be banned, certainly the KPD, to which he belonged. Fuchs removed the hammer and sickle lapel badge he was wearing. Later that year he emigrated to Britain.
They said 150 was almost a month's pay. That would make it about 3200€ or 3500$ (median German income used)
Keep up the good work, it's very important for history and people to understand how Hitler came to power. Many are fast to conclude that the people were forced into it or just stupid to allow Hitler into power..
Should freedom of speech be extended to people who use that freedom to advocate an end to free speech? Curious what a responsible community like this one will think.
Absolutely. Individuals' freedom of speech is (or should be) nearly absolute. If we or the government can simply dictate who does and does not carry it, and more broadly whose beliefs are acceptable and whose are not, then it completely ceases to exist.
@ I see. What about someone who is calling for violent overthrow of the government? Or advocating ripping up the constitution and the bill of rights? Last, what about if they propose those things, and also that an ‘apartheid’ system should be set up in the US?
Principles aside, would restricting extremist speech solve anything in the first place?
A free society can only feasibly restrict the speech of relatively fringe communities, that, due to their small size, aren't really a threat to the established constitutional order. Meanwhile, more popular extremist groups will learn how to act within the confines of what the law permits, and may even actively exploit the restrictions placed upon their speech to gain more support (they validate their anti-establishment bona fides, for example). Or, if such groups are large enough, restricting extremist speech may be directly contrary to basic democratic principles, because you'd be excluding a significant portion of the population from the political process.
I especially want to know when someone advocated to rip up the constitution or abolish my rights. Thats the person ill watch the most.
@@pathutchison7688 so? There's no danger in someone expressing their opinion. Tens of thousands of people in the United States already advocate for doing those things publicly almost every day.
[clearly lisping] "This is Sahara..."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*Bird Cage Nathan Lane nods approvingly*
Schlonterweich trubelnd in einem froschtaufel flatzwerig bei dem bummsteller pfupfeln schnargenzapfend!
Exactly the news that's is in the papers nowadays! 🤣
Saxony and Thuringia - is there a pattern??!
They're a bit stubborn, aren't they!
I sometimes wonder what kind of world we would live in today if the nazis had worn pink onesies with rabbit ears
A world of murderous Teletubbies?! 😮 oh the humanity!!! 😳
I don't know about banning uniforms but I still on plan voting for the DNVP.
Not only are uniforms banned but so is flare
What is the spinning swastika made of in the opening animation? Is it axes or fascis?
It is swastika made of axes. Its coming from John Heartfield's anti-nazi poster "blut und eisen".
Cheers!
@MikiUchman very interesting, thank you very much!
History is repeating itself...
You forgot to mention one very important question at the end of the video:
Is Bianca Castafiore really engaged to captain Haddock?
Okay, next time.
You're the best, but what's the story of the pipe?
Did you boys both wear SA colours specially for this episode?
History doesn’t happen in a vacuum…
0:25 Interesting look pipe. Is it an E-Pipe, similar like E-Cigarette? First time I see one.
It is
Schlenferweich tubeld in einem froschtaufel flatzwertig bei dem bummsteller ... ich bin beeindruckt!
De Gaulle was banned where?!?
Same shit, 90 years later on huh?
Do i see a "laser pipe" on desk? : )
Hi Indy and Sparty
Interesting episode.
It's bizarre how nazi party newspapers are teaching about democracy.
Thanks for the video.
How much, in 2024 money ($ or £ or €) is 150 Reichmarks (the fine for wearing Nazi paraphenalia, in Berlin, circa 1930)?
It was the equivalent to around $50 or $60 in 1930, which would make it about $1,300 today
Ok. So a pretty stiff fine...about equal to a current minimum wage worker's income for about two and a half weeks.@@zacharyhenderson2902
Looking ahead towards our modern era, it's hard not to see parallels. The attempts to constantly split people into "us" vs. "them".
I can really appreciate why modern moderates constantly attempt to pull people back together. Is it the solution? Maybe a hundred years from now TimeGhost 2100 can look back and tell us.
Excelsior , Good Gentleman!!!
1:43 oh, school prayers?
Golden Greek aka Jim Londos. Still the single biggest draw in recorded pro wrestling. Bigger than Hogan, Flair, Austin, Cena, or anyone else you care to name.
No disrespect to Sharkey, I'm a firm believer that Schmeling sweeping him is a huge fluke and robs Sharkey of truly accomplishing what he's capable of. I've spent the last few days in pure disbelief and it just doesn't make sense to me. I've spent the entire regular season watching Jack Sharkey play great boxing it's just not fair.
If Sharkey loses again I will face that Schmeling deserved the win, but I am just 100% sure it was a fluke and does a big disservice to Sharkey and The National Boxing Association
I kinda agree with you on this. If only there was some sort of way to instantly replay recent events in the match, we could see this alleged 'low blow' that sent Schmeling down. I wonder what it was?
What is Hindenburg doing at this time? Which side or Party does He belong too? He is President at this time I Believe.
he is president as you said and he does not belong to a specific party but definitely has political leanings towards the right, comprised of conservatives and monarchists, basically the parties that are not convicted democrats!
19:10 Metropolitan Police of Great Brittan called bobby after Robert=bobby Peele also known as Peelers (not banana peelers lol).
This is the first episode of this series that I have seen. Interesting graphics! That video within a newspaper is cool. I will have to watch more.
I wonder if the time will come when you, or someone else, makes a series about the rise of fascism in the United States. Within four days of the election results being known, masked men with nazi flags demonstrated outside a performance of The Diary of Ann Frank in Howell, Michigan. They then moved to Fowlerville, where they told a witness, "This is now Pureville." (It was local and national news.)
A friend showed me a picture of a literature drop by a white supremacist group in Ames, Iowa, a college town.
And we ain't seen nothin' yet, have we?
(Btw, my father was in tank and truck repair in Europe in 1944 and 45.)
The rise of fascism on the US? Who's directing it? The what, 2 dozen Nazis LARPers? You should be more concerned about a certain political party announcing that they'll form a "shadow government" to thwart the incoming, democratically elected (with a popular vote mandate) administration.
Why is TH-cam deleting my replies??
@@theswampcleaner3856annoyingly enough, TH-cam is not deleting your replies, so your agitprop drivel is now posted thrice under this comment 🙄. Well done getting heating up that tinfoil hat for nothing though.
@@spartacus-olsson agitprop? Oh really? I wasn't the one fear mongering over some dumb LARPers running around with swastikas. Let me guess, you're unaware that Democrat congressmen proposed, on the house floor, to have a shadow government set up to stymy the upcoming administration. You know, REAL issues. Not idiots goose stepping all over the place. And FYI TH-cam isn't showing me my replies. And since it's a well known fact that TH-cam uses AI to scrub comment sections, that's what I assumed happened. But thank you for letting me know that they're still there. (which I just rectified)
@@spartacus-olsson I would gladly delete any duplicates if I could actually see them...
UPDATE!!! I figured it out. I had to go into my google activity to find the dup replies. I removed all except for my original.
I always wonder how the Russian and Ukranian migrants who feld the Russiak civil war reacted to the kpd's constant praisal of the USSR.
Some turned to the Nazis. A decade or so later some were working as interpreters for the German armed forces during Barbarossa.
Excelsior!
what a way to win a Boxing championship lol a low blow, yaaaaaaaa id want a rematch lol
I don't know why, but i just don't get warm with this series...
18:51 Its tan.
This shit is too real right now lol
I just finished discussing this with my wife. The parallels between modern mass news media and the papers of the day are truly frightening.
All the video's should now be in the conservative paper voice.
Okay, the (at least my) answers to the questions:
*Will the banning of Nazi uniforms calm the streets? Hell no. As any good GenXer will tell you the one surefire way to make someone want something is to ban it or make it illegal!
*Will Breuning pull a rabbit out of his hat? Again, Hell no. It's still the same problem, and trying round three of the same solution isn't going to get anyone anywhere.
*Is the liberation of the Rhineland a cause for celebration? No, not really. It'll be a matter of who swoops in the take political control of the liberated area that will matter, not the liberation itself.
*Does Schmelling deserve to keep the title? Yes. A win because your opponent cheated is still a win.
*Will the Nazi success story spread to other states? God, I hope not, those guys give me the creeps.
Yeah these Nazi guys worry me. Hope they never get power, no chance of that ending well.
Guys, love ya to death, your passion and commitment to presenting these historical stories is great, but you each are distracting with your movements when the other is speaking. *AND* most importantly, you each at a couple occasions were mouthing the other persons' lines.
Don't do that. Please. There I said please, so please don't do that.
Thanks.
Excelsior, etc, etc.
👏👏👏
It's Tan it's Tan
👍👍👍
✌✌
ge.ge.ge.ge.ge.ge.ge.ge, ge.ge,ge,ge,ge,ge,ge. , get a job! I like your "style" changes.
14th, 16 November 2024
@sparticus Olsen, you're amazing but you gotta work on your impressions just a bit to keep up with Indy
No thanks, I’m good… Indy is a professional voice actor, and I know better than to try and compete with a pro.
@spartacus-olsson fair enough 😆
feel like this is all happening today with the rise of Dump
What hapend to the jewsh capos in the the nazi deth camps after libration
How is this question relevant to this video might I ask?
@spartacus-olsson it's not it's just a random qustion
@@Pro_Israel but why ask this specific random question here?
@@spartacus-olsson Who knows but now I want the answer. I mean was it understood, looked down upon or were some even tried? Or is this a common denier dogwhistle to ask like asking about how the doors were wooden or something like that?