How to perform a meta-analysis in R

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ค. 2024
  • This is a non-technical walkthrough of how to conduct a gold-standard correlational meta-analysis in R. This is a re-recording of a video that I posted a few years ago, but with better audio quality. I also include two new tools that weren't included in the original video: 1) Weight-function models to directly assess the risk of publication bias (because funnel plot asymmetry is not a direct test of publication bias) and 2) Power analysis for studies included in your meta-analysis.
    Links:
    The paper: www.frontiersin.org/articles/...
    The script and datasets: github.com/dsquintana/corr_meta
    A blog post including a more in-depth explanation of weight selection models: www.dsquintana.blog/how-to-pe...
    A blog post on power analysis for meta-analysis using the 'metameta' R package: www.dsquintana.blog/metameta-...
    The original video: • Conducting a meta-anal...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @jamescutler428
    @jamescutler428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm so happy I found this video! Perfect intro for me for diving right into a meta-analysis quickly in R. This is exactly what I was looking for!

  • @bradeymenz539
    @bradeymenz539 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video Daniel, thank you so much for detailing the code, data and rationale behind the analysis/method

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked the video, thanks for the comment!

  • @braincraft
    @braincraft 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you so much for this!!! I'm performing my first meta-analysis and this video is an amazing resource. It's good to update research methods when necessary, but I wouldn't take the TH-cam comments to heart about poor audio quality on a free educational resource 😅

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your comment, I’m glad you found this video!

  • @vangelis9911
    @vangelis9911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Daniel a meta-regession video would be really helpfull

  • @terrorcamel3601
    @terrorcamel3601 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video saved me countless hours! Thank you so much!

  • @Prof_Julie
    @Prof_Julie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Incredibly useful! Thank you very much for this and all the other videos on meta analysis. They are very useful to complement your paper. Not to mention that such a cute teacher helps a lot with concentration ;)

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the comment, glad to hear these videos are useful!

  • @paulzauzau3131
    @paulzauzau3131 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much for this video. Its a very straight forward and it has helped me to understand how to perform a meta analysis in R.

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for taking the time to write a comment, happy to hear that this was helpful

  • @Toshitaka_work-ft3ip
    @Toshitaka_work-ft3ip 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for creating this video. Great a supplement to textbooks!

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Happy to hear this!

  • @saadalhumaid3959
    @saadalhumaid3959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks very much, mate! Best regards from Saudi Arabia

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the comment, glad this was useful!

  • @actuarialaman7753
    @actuarialaman7753 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Doing a great job sir
    Have a great success in future

  • @mrlettel
    @mrlettel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Daniel, thank you so much for the video. I think it would be better if you take it more specify, e.g., this function is applied to random-effect or fix-effect model. Because the function for these 2 model is different and the result will also be varied a lot.

  • @U2006gmx
    @U2006gmx ปีที่แล้ว

    You're the boss!
    Thanks a lot.

  • @mikehector1
    @mikehector1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Daniel, this was really helpful. Great tutorial indeed. Learned a lot. Thanks for the tips about the 'publication bias', really helpful. I followed your tutorial and was able to reproduce the whole thing!! However, just a little bit of problem I found, probably nothing significant to you, was unable to get rid of printing of 'Common effect model' in the forest plot picture. Both the 'Common effect model' and 'Random effect model' label showing in my Forest plot graph, but can see only 'random effect model' label in your your forest plot graph though. Any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Thank you.

  • @laxmanbisht2638
    @laxmanbisht2638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very useful video.

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your comment, glad you found this useful!

  • @sixucai
    @sixucai หลายเดือนก่อน

    First of all, thank you for the video, Daniel! I have a question tho regarding the dependent effect sizes. As you demonstrated, it is possible to account for this dependency using the robu() function, but what should the workflow look like? How should I follow up with other procedures such as finding the influential studies, plotting a forest plot, test for bias and so on? Or do I do the meta-analysis as if all the effect sizes are independent and only use the robu function to see if the results are robust? Thank you in advance for your time!

  • @richelle-joychia3991
    @richelle-joychia3991 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Daniel, thank you very this insightful video, it is super helpful! I was wondering if the same moderator analyses (res.modage

  • @tommasob.jannini3899
    @tommasob.jannini3899 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Dr. Quintana, thanks for this very useful video. I just have a rapid question. In the Likelihood Ratio test, is it correct that for rejecting the null hypothesis you need a p-value of below 0.1 (in your example p-value was 0.08 and you said that the test was significant)? Thanks again.

  • @janinemedinahuerta3096
    @janinemedinahuerta3096 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for this video, Daniel. It has been super helpful! Would you mind sharing a citation for the publication bias test using the weightr function? Thank you!!

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad this video was helpful! Here is the official citation for the weightr package: Kathleen M. Coburn and Jack L. Vevea (2019). weightr:
      Estimating Weight-Function Models for Publication
      Bias. R package version 2.0.2.
      CRAN.R-project.org/package=weightr. For a number of useful citations related to this method, see the 'selection models' section of our recent preprint psyarxiv.com/75bqn/

    • @janinemedinahuerta3096
      @janinemedinahuerta3096 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dsquintana You're amazing!! Thank you so much!! I'm working on my first meta analysis and I'm scared and excited at the same time. I have probably watched your video and read your script and accompanying paper about 15 times

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@janinemedinahuerta3096 Also check out this excellent (and free) textbook bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/ Good luck!

  • @saadalhumaid3959
    @saadalhumaid3959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would have loved to watch how you make subgroup analysis to lower the heterogeneity

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the suggestion! I hope to include this in a future screencast

  • @saeedewu129
    @saeedewu129 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for you video. Just wanted to know if we can refer Lispay and Wilson (2001) if we use your way to do meta analysis?

  • @SPC700.
    @SPC700. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to attach risk of bias table by the side of a forest plot?

  • @fionnualarogers8443
    @fionnualarogers8443 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this method also work for Cohen's d?

  • @sivaranjanmurugesan2419
    @sivaranjanmurugesan2419 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello sir whether you can take class on full meta analysis for me privately

  • @mihiradhikary7075
    @mihiradhikary7075 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @DNeuropsych
    @DNeuropsych 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Such a helpful video! Saving my disseration! Thank you :)
    One question, I've followed this step by step but my estimators (tau^2 etc) keep coming back as 0, and H^2 as 1. I feel that this isn't correct, can you (or anyone) think where I may have gone wrong for this to occur?
    Thanks :)

    • @DNeuropsych
      @DNeuropsych 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never mind I figured it out haha

    • @mariamnaser5981
      @mariamnaser5981 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      which r version i can find packages plz

  • @tiyashuda
    @tiyashuda 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can i join research with you? im interest in meta analysis research

  • @rectorrector8637
    @rectorrector8637 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Dr Quintana
    I have read with interest your paper on using R for meta-analysis published in 2015. I wanted to access the supplementary file but the link in the article simply takes me back to the original paper.
    Would you be so kind to assist with a copy?
    Tyrone

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, I believe this is the link you're looking for as this contains all the supplementary scripts and data github.com/dsquintana/corr_meta

    • @rectorrector8637
      @rectorrector8637 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dsquintana Thanks so much Doc

  • @jimpyjohn2474
    @jimpyjohn2474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Daniel, I am conducting an MA with only 4 studies included and the Isquare test is 0%. Is there an easy interpretation for this? I assume I'm probably missing some criterium for being able to run the test.

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I squared is not sensitive to the number of studies in a meta-analysis, but rather, the precision of each study (i.e., sample size). I would recommend reporting a range of heterogeneity measures as all common measures have pros and cons bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/heterogeneity.html

  • @mariamnaser5981
    @mariamnaser5981 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    First, thank you very much for your good effort,I have this problem can u help me

  • @sampoornanandi5671
    @sampoornanandi5671 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, is there a way to plot the moderator analyses? Thanks!

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, it’s possible to plot both categorical and continuous moderator analysis. I hope to demonstrate this in a future video

    • @sampoornanandi5671
      @sampoornanandi5671 ปีที่แล้ว

      great, thanks!@@dsquintana

  • @CS-si8kl
    @CS-si8kl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why such good audio quality ? It distracts me from the technical contents of the video. JK 😂😂. Thanks for the video BTW.

  • @kevind.shabahang
    @kevind.shabahang ปีที่แล้ว

    give 'er

  • @georgegl3192
    @georgegl3192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OMG, such poor audio quality. Have you been recording this with a potato? ;)

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha the audio quality of the original video pretty much sounded like that. Happy that a new version is out!

  • @jorgemmmmteixeira
    @jorgemmmmteixeira 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why such a poor video quality? jk

    • @dsquintana
      @dsquintana  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂

    • @actuarialaman7753
      @actuarialaman7753 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dsquintana yeh sir the quality is not good we are not able to see properly
      Plz do something