Gibbs Free Energy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 146

  • @spfaff
    @spfaff 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Despite the calc errors, this was very helpful. Thx.

  • @AvilesChemtutor
    @AvilesChemtutor 13 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Could you check the entropy value -118.0 j/mol, in the sample you used 118 kJ instead of J/K.
    Good job though, I really enjoy your videos.

  • @brukansebo4740
    @brukansebo4740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it should be 232Kj- - (273Kj X0.138 kj/K)

  • @baraskparas9559
    @baraskparas9559 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best description ever. Logical, calm explanation.

  • @therealjordiano
    @therealjordiano 12 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    nice vid imo :)
    btw the units of the ∆S should be J/K near the end .. i think

  • @ull893
    @ull893 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for explaining such a difficult topic so clearly ..Makes life easier..

  • @rithwiqnair537
    @rithwiqnair537 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Wait a sec... the answer should be " -232 -37.7 = -269.7". Why did she subtract??
    Math Error.

  • @davethedm
    @davethedm 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot to mention that -delta(G) is spontaneous in the FORWARD direction. Positive delta(G) is essentially saying spontaneous in the reverse direction.

  • @kokocipher
    @kokocipher 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    defining entropy as disorder is actually misleading. Entropy isn't really about disorder or chaos, but rather becoming equilibrium with the environment. A great example is a drop of ink into a clear glass of water. The ink drop can be best described as trying to become equilibrium in concentration with the glass of water instead of becoming more chaotic. Because after the equilibrium has been reached, "chaotic" process sort of dies out.

  • @joshthepole0
    @joshthepole0 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Youre like a genius chemistry guru--thanks for helping me get that A

  • @lajc2580
    @lajc2580 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Literally this video and the khan academy video helped me understand this better. Thank god this video exists during the pandemic lol.

  • @ElafTaleb
    @ElafTaleb 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was not just helpful.. It was really great!

  • @kelvinchristie4005
    @kelvinchristie4005 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    -232kj - 37.7= -269.7 not -232kj -37.7kj = 194.3. The video is good overall. He did not carry a thick accent in which I could not have understand her. over all she is a wonderful public speaker.

  • @brightstorm
    @brightstorm  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @WHY70122 Thanks for your nice words. If you go to Brightstorm site, you can find videos for your topic much conveniently. You can search with keywords, browse by topic, or even use your textbook page to find related videos.

  • @hillsongss
    @hillsongss 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Something about the way you teach makes me understand. YAY!

  • @mohamadbaker8711
    @mohamadbaker8711 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I very like the instructor.....but i think she made a mistake with units of delta S as it is in Joules....either a typo or she should have converted to KJ.

    • @RushHour2k5
      @RushHour2k5 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree that there is an error. However, I believe it may have been with the initial units. I think the -118.0 should have been kJ instead of just J. If you convert to kJ the temperature is extermely high at 7528K which makes the reaction non-spontaneous.

  • @chemicalgurus
    @chemicalgurus 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this video and the teacher who is teaching.

  • @blkchrm77
    @blkchrm77 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    You and the really enthusiastic physics guy are my favourite

  • @AB-gf5ii
    @AB-gf5ii 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Omg thank you! I finally understand.

  • @ishitagupta3982
    @ishitagupta3982 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    how y guys can make such a diff topic a cakewalk? loved it !

  • @joelarunkumar1615
    @joelarunkumar1615 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @ 3:30 how does -232kj - 37.7kj = -194.3kj ? shouldn't it be -269.7kj?

    • @StarFox008
      @StarFox008 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's supposed to be -232 kJ - (-37.7 kJ) = -232 kJ + 37.7 kJ = -194.3 kJ.
      The final answer is correct, she just wrote the sign wrong.

    • @sujitbikkumanla9581
      @sujitbikkumanla9581 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      StarFox008 no the entropy and the Temp are both positive, in the eq they become negative, so yes 267 is right

  • @kelvinchristie4005
    @kelvinchristie4005 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was not a matter of unit was the problem. The problem that she was having is in algebra. What was confusing is that she could have done the problem in joules and then converted to kilojoules, so that viewers would not have gotten confused with the K values.

  • @teperc9702
    @teperc9702 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Cramerica66 It's not bad, just a way of differentiating. By "bad" we mean "unable to proceed in the forward reaction". Hope this helps :).

  • @mklb11
    @mklb11 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is your definition of "good" and "not good"?

  • @aoifewest
    @aoifewest 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    did I read it well? at the 2nd problem she calculated KJ with Joules then the way how she finds T is not right either.

  • @Fallschirmjager18
    @Fallschirmjager18 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    These videos are helpful, but I like the physics guy more. He's the best.

  • @Bakugantsuvai1
    @Bakugantsuvai1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am not bragging, I am just shocked how ahead our Canadian curricula is ahead of the United States.

  • @SuperKnowledgeSponge
    @SuperKnowledgeSponge 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are wrong. The equation is
    888.3 kJ/mol= T (118.0 kJ/K)
    T = 888.3/118.0 = 7.53

  • @ngujenny8752
    @ngujenny8752 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why the standard temperature is 273K? should be 298 K right?

  • @Xammm0809
    @Xammm0809 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Om last question why nt just do T = delta H / delta S , much quicker

  • @melissanyberg8893
    @melissanyberg8893 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So good explanation!

  • @timpham27
    @timpham27 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish shes my teacher! she can teach way better than my teacher. thank you so much!

  • @doonehm
    @doonehm 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation - thank you.

  • @scifreak5504
    @scifreak5504 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really helped. Thanks a lot!

  • @frntfrnt
    @frntfrnt 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.dont worry about your talking speed I can replay it anytime :)

  • @361Angle
    @361Angle 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very helpful, but i have a questionIn, the last problem, how did u know that temperature is in Kelvin, not Celsius? Because all the given data didn't specify what unit the temperature in

  • @CHIVAC0LA
    @CHIVAC0LA 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelent. Very clear, and quick!!

  • @t-alimichael3363
    @t-alimichael3363 ปีที่แล้ว

    seems to be having a problem reading what you or someone else wrote via speed talking. Thanks for the help though.

  • @fkeopfkeop
    @fkeopfkeop 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for making this video

  • @nmubunny5975
    @nmubunny5975 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a shame TH-cam doesn't have a slowdown speed for 0.75 because I think that would be perfect for this video. I personally like that she's talking fast because the video doesn't drag on and I get what I need to know fast rather than skipping through it, but for people who want her to be slow, the 0.75 feature would allow students to listen to her at normal speed. Great prof and great video!

  • @o0oBoss
    @o0oBoss 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    every thing is good
    but my only question is :
    at the final example the unit is ( kj /mol ) din't we have to change it to (kj/k) ????
    i din't know but Im felling that there is some thing wrong with the units

  • @Cramerica66
    @Cramerica66 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am confused why is it that if it is not spontaneous it is suddenly a bad thing? I have not heard of that before. Could someone please explain? Or is it just a way of saying they are two very separate things. I figure spontaneous things such as flammable objects would be considered bad, not the other way around. Any help would rock thank you :)

  • @aldosalthren
    @aldosalthren 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    "should be in Kelvin... can also be in Celsius." I'm like 80% sure it needs to be an absolute scale so I don't think Celsius would work... maybe the Rankine scale?

  • @xForceDee
    @xForceDee 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @brightstorm2 at 3:20 did you do that math in your head if so where did you learn to day math like that in your head I am a fairly intelligent person and it took me about 3x as long to do that.

  • @john718able
    @john718able 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    what happened to the negative sign next to the temp
    888.3= -T +118 kj
    888.3-118= -T
    7.53 = -T
    so T = -7.53 !!!

  • @afrozabashar8231
    @afrozabashar8231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @niamatullah1369
    @niamatullah1369 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very helpfull...Thanks alot

  • @ahmedeid2340
    @ahmedeid2340 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful

  • @laDy8A5737
    @laDy8A5737 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's what I got too. I don't follow that detail.

  • @djung222
    @djung222 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @1006Will Good thing she's super articulate :)

  • @ananthu62
    @ananthu62 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is Gibb's free energy concept useful only to predict feasibility for chemical reactions? Any other use in mechanical engineering?

  • @fadhll
    @fadhll 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    You did not unified the unites of enthalpy and entropy

  • @uekikuske009
    @uekikuske009 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    how come your entropy is in the form of kJ? shouldn't it be in J/mol.K?

  • @Nestlewahm
    @Nestlewahm 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wouldn't you have to convert DS to be in KJ/mol? otherwise it would not cancel out.

  • @cringecrusher2001
    @cringecrusher2001 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

  • @p3kante00
    @p3kante00 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    she speaks fine. stop complaining guys you could always replay the parts you missed.

    • @sujitbikkumanla9581
      @sujitbikkumanla9581 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Patrick Ante I know right?! I don't understand all the complaining

  • @Bakugantsuvai1
    @Bakugantsuvai1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, is this really university stuff? I did this for a grade 11 chemistry project, too bad I did not find this before then.

  • @salmaosama2978
    @salmaosama2978 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really helpful 💜

  • @rossrandazzo8203
    @rossrandazzo8203 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Isn't -232-37.7= -269.7? Math error?

  • @dannysanchez8543
    @dannysanchez8543 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U forgot to change 118 j/mols into Kj so it shud have been i believe .0118kj/mol

    • @abebom7911
      @abebom7911 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually .118 but you're right. Haha, great video just forgot to check for the KJ and J conversions on the last few steps.

  • @Postcalculus
    @Postcalculus 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb. Could this be used to derive the Nernst equation in electrochemistry as referred by you at the start of the lecture. There is a lecturer who has explained this, but he conveniently assumed the Gibbs free energy equation to jump to the Nernst equation without the intervening explanation.

  • @kapakayalarajasekhar774
    @kapakayalarajasekhar774 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't get tensed nobody behind you

  • @samihooti
    @samihooti 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much

  • @9247173757
    @9247173757 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi how can i explain surface tension by thermodynamic analysis using gibbs equation such as surface exess and area occupied per molecule at the interface

  • @sss23431
    @sss23431 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow thank you sooo sooo much!!!!!

  • @samcheneyus
    @samcheneyus 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    She made two mistakes. -232 - 37.7 = -269.7 and it should be .118kJ/K in the last problem...

  • @rajmusale2729
    @rajmusale2729 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice explanation....

  • @MrBajra11
    @MrBajra11 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!!! Thanksss!!!

  • @KISHANKUMAR-yr7nt
    @KISHANKUMAR-yr7nt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks madam. first time very hard this topic Gibbs free energy..... but now Gibbs free energy easily topic thermodynamic chapter...but one problem this topic Ellinghans Diagram.......

  • @mezzzare
    @mezzzare 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. She's a great teacher (hot too) and really puts things in a way that makes you listen and understand. A small mistake in the calculation can be forgiven, she's taught the principle Ian. Simple way. Thank you

  • @saouravkumar8891
    @saouravkumar8891 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    mam please upload about spectoscopy

  • @imnotdan009
    @imnotdan009 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    she didnt convert J of Delta S to KJ.

  • @UliSwag
    @UliSwag 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Describing entropy as "disorder" is still confusing to me

  • @atheeralattar8893
    @atheeralattar8893 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    LIKE....thanks..u made my life easy

  • @KhabisangLekena
    @KhabisangLekena 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So helpful, but try to slow down.

  • @Chrisdobbs16
    @Chrisdobbs16 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video but please slow down!!!!!! I do have unlimited data which means your video can last 30 seconds longer and be tons more understandable.

  • @MKrell24
    @MKrell24 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Although I think this videos are really helpful (mostly because I can pay more attention when its not 8 in the morning), they have the same problem as my normal chemistry lessons in that they don't conceptually teach anything, they just show you how to do the problems. Instead of just saying that we want temp to be high when the reaction was endothermic and the change in entropy was positive, explain why thats the case. Its useless to know this stuff if you cant apply it outside of the class.

  • @KiranKumar-dj5pw
    @KiranKumar-dj5pw 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    it looks like she is explaining in a mathematical way....look at her at 5:59

  • @moatazwaheed3707
    @moatazwaheed3707 11 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Please slow down

  • @mscdennis12
    @mscdennis12 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everyone taking the class is not necessarily a science major or good in it. No need to brag.

  • @PRIYANKASHARMA-he2mt
    @PRIYANKASHARMA-he2mt 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I also like this

  • @82tomify
    @82tomify 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    that is why there is a pause button

  • @eleazaralmazan4089
    @eleazaralmazan4089 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Math and Science teachers that "Don't Suck!" Haha!

  • @tothedeath456
    @tothedeath456 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks your videos are good :) but you do kinda make a few mistakes - maybe watch it through before you upload it to make sure its right??

  • @ak-ul3nc
    @ak-ul3nc 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    U speak very fast

    • @ayk2086
      @ayk2086 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      r u on 2x speed?

    • @jimhalpert9803
      @jimhalpert9803 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am *s p e e d*

  • @mylak1099
    @mylak1099 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    for everyone saying she's too fast: put the video at 0.75x speed lol

  • @srbirajdar
    @srbirajdar 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes...she made a mistake reaction temp.. 7-8 K....r u kidding me?

  • @fadhll
    @fadhll 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    unify*

  • @timwilson2920
    @timwilson2920 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Entropy increased ? "Thats good, we like disorder" Increased from what? It is 138 J/K is an increase from what?? And why is every explanation missing vital info.( especially my class).

  • @mohammedkhalifa3943
    @mohammedkhalifa3943 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are blessed, I am so thankful

  • @WHY70122
    @WHY70122 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there any button more than 5 stars :)
    ************* ive made it though :D i agree with someone above that u gotta slow down a bit . Cuz this is one of the most difficult part in chem 2 i guess. I have my own favourite channels that help me with chem but for this problem...i never find those useful except this one. Thanks a lot for uploading this. And if u have time plz label ur vids with more specified details so we dont get messed trying to search ur vids...cuz before i came up with this...

  • @davidjanes5627
    @davidjanes5627 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    this only scratched the surface of it need hard problems wrt more thermodynamics

  • @jacobl.743
    @jacobl.743 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:52 "the nutellas"

  • @malo3287
    @malo3287 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    please slow down pleasssssss, thank you

  • @young-igotana-jamie5316
    @young-igotana-jamie5316 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    which potato did you record this video with?

  • @zxsdwe170
    @zxsdwe170 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tnks and I found ^G as -269.674 kj/mol

  • @midhun3197
    @midhun3197 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Add a short sentence to the tail of each labels mentioning " I;m gonna teach fast and whoever bothers can pls shut ther traps and stay away from the video ".......well taught :D !!!

  • @aryanjoshi3395
    @aryanjoshi3395 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    She is left handed!!

  • @charlessantosti
    @charlessantosti 11 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Too many mathematical mistakes... Pay attention to your units and the negative signs

    • @Be1smaht
      @Be1smaht 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      ooooooo.. thats not good. I read this during the commercial. I dont know now.

  • @kadarumahender
    @kadarumahender 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    your are teaching god