I must say. I read the books of Graham Hancock and Alice Roberts as a teen. Both got me Into archeology and mythology. Graham got people interested and inspired many, which we can't take away from him. But it's apparent that Graham is doing exactly what he claims "Archeologists" do, which is be over protective of an idea despite the abundant or lack of evidence and attacks those who try and dispute it. Your work and your colleagues work speaks for itself. A huge amount of YT channels are psuedo archeologist. But alot of them are just miss guided and don't mean any harm, so, more pros like yourself need to stand up and educate and guide people. Love the show, solid work. Keep it up. Sorry for the rant. I just feel that Quality professional archeological YT channels are hard to find and don't get the audience they deserve. But you will in time, and it's important to keep it up. Brains are melting out here from all the kaka.
I was the same. I was fascinated by Hancock books and naively intoxicated by the ideas he pedals. It’s ok . We’re curious people and eventually that curiosity led down the right rabbit hole
*@experienceanimation217* I'm personally dismissive of Graham Hancock, but why do you pair Alice Roberts with him? Most of my knowledge of Alice Roberts is watching around half the episodes of _Digging for Britain,_ but I don't remember her saying anything conspiracy-oriented. At the same time, I've never read any of her books. Is Alice Roberts a bit of a nut like Graham Hancock? *Reply to:* _"I read the books of Graham Hancock and Alice Roberts as a teen."_
I watched from the start. Brilliant stuff. Now its on YT plus the patreon funded new digs with all the high tech stuff. What an advance on having to wait for geophiz to print out on the steam driven printer in the back of the truck.
A *_year_* of chemotherapy? Oh, no! >_< I had chemo twice but for much shorter periods (cancer in my csse). Every drop of my empathy goes out to anyone enduring chemotherapy whether it is for cancer or not.
@@FlintDibble I wish you well with this. Both my husband and I have fought cancer. My husband’s fight with melanoma continues. I honestly hope yours does not. Best wishes to you.
To be fair, world population in 79 CE (Pompeii destruction) less than 300 million. Today's population about 8 billion. I'm happy for you, congratulations! Great show!
@@FlintDibble I can't initiate threads for some reason. Just wanted to say that was bloody brilliant Flint! I'll be at the front every lecture with a few bits of Hagoromo chalk just in case I need to ingratiate myself 😆 Could you do a piece on Roman lead pollution in ice cores and anything we've found before the Romans. No need to even mention "you know what". It's splendid evidence for when mankind (nearly) industrialised until a certain carpenter with a penchant for hanging around the harbour to meet all those butch trawlermen lost us 2,000 years of progress. We'd be colonising the local stars by now! I thought Flint, for your Dad to name you Flint, considering what his specialty was, he must've been so very proud of you! When I named my kids I know how much thought I put into it (if you were a guy called Leslie, you would too!) and it struck me when you mentioned what he studied. Apologies for replying here mate, I can't initiate a fresh comment for some reason. Looking forward to the next one, meantime, I'm exploring your links. 🍻 Lechyd da Flint! 🤠
@@Aengus42 As an atheist myself, I'm not a big fan of Christianity. But are you saying Christianity stopped the industrial age from happening until the mid-18th century? If so, what aspect of Christianity prevented/delayed industrialisation? I'd like to have ammunition against any religion (especially Christianity), but I'm not seeing how Christianity stopped industrialisation. *Reply to:* _"It's splendid evidence for when mankind (nearly) industrialised until a certain carpenter with a penchant for hanging around the harbour to meet all those butch trawlermen lost us 2,000 years of progress."_
Around 19:00 perhaps not bias as most people think, but I tend to think about many things from a martial perspective first as that's my primary area of interest. Where common sees an embossed bronze dish, I may see a disc armor, etc.
I have two peer reviewed papers in hand, archeology and geology, strongly supporting construction of the Nile Complex at 14 thousand years (independent of Dr Schoch). Herodotus writes the prehistoric Egyptians did not eat the fish. I wonder why.
Sound monitoring ... I suggest you have a cell phone set to receive your channel, and feeding not into a speaker, but into two meters that would be on your control panel ... comparing your mic output and the YT output.
Flint i gotta say I think you have a great personality for streaming, I enjoyed it and look forwards to seeing more. Especially interviews! In person visits to sites would be awesome but just some online interviews with some nice pics or video to go along with the conversation is great still!
For someone with very little experience in streaming, you are great at it. I got to know you through Milo Rossi and i love your video's. For the Q&A sections, Would it be possible to put the chat on screen so we can see wich question you are answering?
Good choice for the name. It does kinda put you in the spotlight , every pseudo scientist and miss informer talk about Big Archaeology. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
Just about to watch this 2 weeks late. Can I plug the UK Prehistory Guys for anyone into prehistory. They are bit by bit filming an epic journey from Gölbekli Tepe to Stonehenge. They have also previoudly had the guy in charge of Gölbekli Tepe ( forget the proper word) on live Q and A and chat. Very infirmative.
Hey flint, id love for you to contact Jimmy Akin and have a conversation with him. He has one of the top science podcasts out there “jimmy akin’s mysterious world” he frequently deals with pseudo arch and science. I believe he was planning on debunking graham hancock at one point. Anyway he has a beard, a cowboy hat, and takes scientific authorities very seriously including Egyptology and archaeology in general.
I couldn't make the live stream, listening to it several days later, the sound quality wasn't very good. Even with the speakers and YT volumes set to maximum I was have problems with being able to hear you.
@Flint Dibble Dr. Dibble, I apologize for missing your live. Since you mentioned reading Plato in the original Greek, is there a grammar text you can recommend for self learning Ancient Greek? I’m unable to take a university course and would love to give it an honest college try on my own. I’m a senior on a limited income but I can still understand what I read, and I’m willing to learn what I can on my own. I thoroughly enjoyed Dr. Raff’s book ‘Origin’.
Hmmm the two main ancient Greek textbooks I know of are Hansen and Quinn and Athenaze. Both have different styles Hansen and Quinn is dense and very grammatical but gives very clear and explicit descriptions and drills for ancient Greek Athenaze is more akin to an immersion style, having you start reading right away with modern, simplified versions of ancient Greek stories so that you can start reading right away The downside to not taking a class is that you can't get guidance or corrections. I believe there are people who offer online tutoring in ancient languages. It could be you could supplement your learning with occasional tutoring to get guidance, corrections, and perspective
Graham Hancock won me over for like a full year when I first heard his theorys. You and Milo definitely helped me see through his psuedoscience. I'm actually so embarrassed I recommended ancient apocalypse to friends 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️ Your appearance on Joe Rogan was by far my favorite Joe Rogan episode to date. The way you dismantled him was incredible. That was probably one of the best live debunkings I've seen in my life. It was on par with James Randi and the spoon guy. Thank you for the work you do and I hope to see you on Rogan again. Also I really enjoyed you on bridges!
Except...Flint either intentionally or accidently omitted the truth about the ice core samples and the seafaring topic. I've listened to both side and Hancock's point isn't debunked. In fact, I believe him even more now. Listen to what he just released on his TH-cam channel.
There is such thing as a natural, instinctive “common sense”. Common sense always grows from experience and learning. So saying it’s “common sense” itself is actually a huge subconscious bias
"what about me? i saw the fall of troy, wwv, i pushed boxes at the boston tea party, now i'm gonna die, in a dungeon... in cardiff!" i'd like to visit cardiff someday
Cardiff is a nice city, but in all honesty Swansea is a "nicer" place to visit with some cool Neolithic sites within The Gower with one site (paviland cave ) dating back to 33,000 BCE.
You could leverage your conection with destiney to get him to help you with audio/video setup. Its like bait for him and its something he knows a lot about. Audio handling by computers can be fairly sophisticated, having a tech do setup can ensure you sound as beautiful as bossible.
Hey, it turns out that there is a ton of lead emissions found in ice core samples in both Greenland and Antarctica from the Ice Age. A huge spike, actually. So you either knowingly omitted that from your JRE debate with Hancock or didn't follow enough due diligence. Either way, your assertion on the topic is scientifically flawed. You should probably make a statement about it.
Watch my aftermath video. I address it there. Watch my interview with Danny jones, I address it in detail there And I will make a reply to his video. Thanks for the comment!
@@FlintDibble Danny Jones? Haven't heard of him but I assume it's a podcast with a relatively equal number of listeners as Joe Rogan, or is that incorrect? Just looked it up...seems JRE has roughly 16x the listeners and almost unquantifiable social advantage, so any misleading information presented as fact on JRE would have an effect in at least one order of magnitude compared to any corrections made on Danny Jones. Hancock has never insinuated that indigenous cultures weren't capable of achieving some of the developments attributed to the forming of civilization, he merely integrates accounts of stories told in ethnographic studies performed by degree-holding anthropologists within the same ethnic group heritage as the subject culture. The accusation that Hancock's work propagates ideas of white supremacy is the very definition of pseudoscience and bias. By my math, whatever corrections you will make about the misinformation you avowed on JRE on this channel will have a 1/571 effect to the damage you've already done. I've been following the debate about an ancient civilization for years and it's become clear there was a global cultural exchange that predates recorded history that "Big Archeology" isn't comfortable with acknowledging. The nature of science is to pose an open-ended question for which the answers are never concrete as new evidence is presented. Your stance regarding ancient advanced humanity with the information at our disposal has forced me to come to view you as a pseudoscientist, more concerned with status quo and funding than research into new perspectives and evidence. The refusal to consider new evidence and cultural correlations by established scholars, like yourself, is perhaps the manifestation of a more heinous "whitewashing" than anything that Hancock suggests. I hope you enjoyed your 15 minutes of fame.
@orionsage7314 they weren't corrections. Claiming what I said was wrong about ice cores is itself wrong I was right about them. Very clearly and demonstrably right
Until I got into historical TH-camrs like TIK and Cynical Historian, I never considered historiography, which greatly biased my understanding of history Video games and movies also heavily bias my understanding of history Video games (specifically strategy games) make it more difficult for me to conceive of a world without nation states. They also make me think things like technological progress is more measurable than it is. Video games (especially multiplayer video games) also tend to portray different cultures nation states and empires in a morally neutral manner (I get it, no one wants to play as a bad guy, but it still probably skews my perspective) Movies of course narrativizes and individualizes my perspective on history. They make it difficult for me to see certain historical figures as human beings rather than archetypes. They also make me feel like humans have more agency when it comes to historical outcomes than they probably do.
He went head to head with Hancock on that Joe Rogan show not long ago. Then the Hancock sycophants flooded his university with letters demanding that he be fired. He was also _falsely_ accused of violating US federal law by mishandlng Native remains. They were vicious!
Your channels has great potential. Just your personality and curiosity in the subject. Now you just need consistency and time to grow the channel. Wish you well
My bias is towards the academic consensus. I’m willing to go against it with very good evidence. But that is my first point of call to a framework to put the new evidence into
Was there ever an Isrealite civilization In the Americas. I have met people who testify that such a community existed. Where did such and idea come from?
One of the early theories for the existence of native Americans (the peopleing of the Americas basically) was they were the “lost tribes of Israel”. This was like, in the 15th and 16th century, and then Joseph Smith, of Book of Mormon fame, adopted that concept and ran with it and it’s managed to stay in the fringes of public consciousness ever since. The land bridge/Beringia hypothesis started in the 16th century but it wasn’t the dominant theory in public consciousness until like, 100 years ago.
The sound was poor from 4:15-7:36, but it improved at the latter. If you left at 4:15, you should come back to watch 7:36 to the end. *Reply to:* _"Hi, the sound is bad. Get a grip bro and get a good mike set up x"_
I won't bother watching another live stream if you are going to be almost entirely inaudible. When you unnecessarily got up to get your hat you must have knocked something because you were suddenly *FAR* too quiet, muggy and distant. As if the microphone teleported into a bathroom 50 feet away. If you cannot learn to use your equipment properly your live streams are a waste of time. There's a political channel, _"A Different Bias",_ who has the same problem: high quality videos, utterly appalling live streams. And he shares your arrogance that it's not his fault and there's nothing he can do about it, so we should turn *OUR* volume up. Funny how it's only an issue on a small number of channels, don't you think? {:o:O:}
i never said it wasn't my fault, but it wasn't something i could figure out how to solve live on-the-spot, and since people in the chat were telling me to continue because they could hear me with the new mic, i did continue i've been working on improving my audio, and improving the channel as a whole. but it's a process, and costs money beyond my teacher salary. my experience is archaeology. i'm learning youtubing because people are interested in watching/listening end point. these technical issues with livestreams will be solved. but given their 'live' nature, sometimes they won't be solved adequately in the moment
I must say. I read the books of Graham Hancock and Alice Roberts as a teen. Both got me Into archeology and mythology. Graham got people interested and inspired many, which we can't take away from him. But it's apparent that Graham is doing exactly what he claims "Archeologists" do, which is be over protective of an idea despite the abundant or lack of evidence and attacks those who try and dispute it.
Your work and your colleagues work speaks for itself. A huge amount of YT channels are psuedo archeologist. But alot of them are just miss guided and don't mean any harm, so, more pros like yourself need to stand up and educate and guide people.
Love the show, solid work. Keep it up. Sorry for the rant. I just feel that Quality professional archeological YT channels are hard to find and don't get the audience they deserve. But you will in time, and it's important to keep it up. Brains are melting out here from all the kaka.
I was the same. I was fascinated by Hancock books and naively intoxicated by the ideas he pedals. It’s ok . We’re curious people and eventually that curiosity led down the right rabbit hole
*@experienceanimation217* I'm personally dismissive of Graham Hancock, but why do you pair Alice Roberts with him?
Most of my knowledge of Alice Roberts is watching around half the episodes of _Digging for Britain,_ but I don't remember her
saying anything conspiracy-oriented.
At the same time, I've never read any of her books. Is Alice Roberts a bit of a nut like Graham Hancock?
*Reply to:* _"I read the books of Graham Hancock and Alice Roberts as a teen."_
I also got inspired (and conned) by Hancock and believed his made up fantasy stories. The truth is at least as interesting as his fantasies!
if people knew how cool the truth is, there would be no need to make stuff up. Great stream I enjoyed it!
@kcloudz8182 greatest story ever told. It's better than fiction because you can't make it up, lol
Yesssss 👍👍👍
If you want to see fun but meaningful TV archeology try the original series of the UK show Time Team - one of my favourite shows ever!
It had everything. Baldrick, a Yokel, and a Brummie digging the dirt.
Loved the interaction between them and the Geo-phys folks!
I enjoy Time Team !
@@owenjones3071 it led to a huge upswell in interest in archaeology in the uk that continues to this day
I watched from the start. Brilliant stuff. Now its on YT plus the patreon funded new digs with all the high tech stuff. What an advance on having to wait for geophiz to print out on the steam driven printer in the back of the truck.
My main problem with the building of the pyramids is that most of the workers were old gizas!
Stealing
Nice.
@@hcrone Glad somebody appreciates my bad humor!
I really enjoyed Dr Jennifer Raff, ancient DNA is such a fascinating topic . Keep keeping it real .
Love the video!! Can’t wait for the next installment of this series, especially the collab with miniminuteman 💖
When merch was mentioned I was already imagining a Fedora with "real archeology rocks" on it 😅
Great stream, keep up the good work
Thanks!
Thanks mik3c!
Thanks for this, Flint! Very excited about what you have planned for your channel!
A *_year_* of chemotherapy? Oh, no! >_<
I had chemo twice but for much shorter periods (cancer in my csse). Every drop of my empathy goes out to anyone enduring chemotherapy whether it is for cancer or not.
Yeah it was for melanoma, which hopefully ain't coming back after that. Wishing you strength too!
@@FlintDibble I wish you well with this. Both my husband and I have fought cancer. My husband’s fight with melanoma continues. I honestly hope yours does not. Best wishes to you.
Great stream.
To be fair, world population in 79 CE (Pompeii destruction) less than 300 million. Today's population about 8 billion. I'm happy for you, congratulations! Great show!
Thanks Russell!
@@FlintDibble I can't initiate threads for some reason.
Just wanted to say that was bloody brilliant Flint! I'll be at the front every lecture with a few bits of Hagoromo chalk just in case I need to ingratiate myself 😆
Could you do a piece on Roman lead pollution in ice cores and anything we've found before the Romans.
No need to even mention "you know what". It's splendid evidence for when mankind (nearly) industrialised until a certain carpenter with a penchant for hanging around the harbour to meet all those butch trawlermen lost us 2,000 years of progress.
We'd be colonising the local stars by now!
I thought Flint, for your Dad to name you Flint, considering what his specialty was, he must've been so very proud of you!
When I named my kids I know how much thought I put into it (if you were a guy called Leslie, you would too!) and it struck me when you mentioned what he studied.
Apologies for replying here mate, I can't initiate a fresh comment for some reason.
Looking forward to the next one, meantime, I'm exploring your links.
🍻 Lechyd da Flint! 🤠
@@Aengus42 As an atheist myself, I'm not a big fan of Christianity.
But are you saying Christianity stopped the industrial age from happening until the mid-18th century?
If so, what aspect of Christianity prevented/delayed industrialisation?
I'd like to have ammunition against any religion (especially Christianity), but I'm not seeing how Christianity stopped industrialisation.
*Reply to:* _"It's splendid evidence for when mankind (nearly) industrialised until a certain carpenter with a penchant for hanging around the harbour to meet all those butch trawlermen lost us 2,000 years of progress."_
Around 19:00 perhaps not bias as most people think, but I tend to think about many things from a martial perspective first as that's my primary area of interest. Where common sees an embossed bronze dish, I may see a disc armor, etc.
Nice! 👍
I have two peer reviewed papers in hand, archeology and geology, strongly supporting construction of the Nile Complex at 14 thousand years (independent of Dr Schoch). Herodotus writes the prehistoric Egyptians did not eat the fish. I wonder why.
Rsd tyler owen cook got smart. Your channel is going to be big
❤ love the new hat
Really enjoy ur ch, can u please put the hat back on tho? The glare is terrible! Lol joking
Sound monitoring ... I suggest you have a cell phone set to receive your channel, and feeding not into a speaker, but into two meters that would be on your control panel ... comparing your mic output and the YT output.
Oh cool a Dr. Brad Lepper interview! I hope we get some juicy ohio valley archaeology discussion out of him
Man i missed the livestream! I hope i can catch the next one
Look at you!
New member here.
Looking fondly forward.
Flint i gotta say I think you have a great personality for streaming, I enjoyed it and look forwards to seeing more. Especially interviews!
In person visits to sites would be awesome but just some online interviews with some nice pics or video to go along with the conversation is great still!
For someone with very little experience in streaming, you are great at it. I got to know you through Milo Rossi and i love your video's. For the Q&A sections, Would it be possible to put the chat on screen so we can see wich question you are answering?
Good choice for the name.
It does kinda put you in the spotlight , every pseudo scientist and miss informer talk about Big Archaeology.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
44:00 I'm new to archaeology.
What do others think about the Flint Dibble vs Graham Hancock debate on Joe Rogan's show?
.
We love you and all you do!!!
Enjoyed the talk. Thanks.
Internet "is" for education a dream I had in 1981 during my computer degree my first was World History.
Ancient high tech civilization nuts are like Sasquatch believers... We just haven't looked 'everywhere' yet. 🙄
Thank you.
Just about to watch this 2 weeks late. Can I plug the UK Prehistory Guys for anyone into prehistory. They are bit by bit filming an epic journey from Gölbekli Tepe to Stonehenge. They have also previoudly had the guy in charge of Gölbekli Tepe ( forget the proper word) on live Q and A and chat. Very infirmative.
Hey flint, id love for you to contact Jimmy Akin and have a conversation with him. He has one of the top science podcasts out there “jimmy akin’s mysterious world” he frequently deals with pseudo arch and science. I believe he was planning on debunking graham hancock at one point. Anyway he has a beard, a cowboy hat, and takes scientific authorities very seriously including Egyptology and archaeology in general.
Graham has a quarter million views in 24 hrs. Who won the debate?
in that video he acknowledges he did "poorly" and that i "outmatched" him. so, i think i did.
guess you weren't one of those quarter million views
@@FlintDibble The truth of our dirty chemical past is out my friend.
@@candui-7 "dirty chemical past"?
*Reply to:* _"The truth of our dirty chemical past is out my friend."_
@@miyojewoltsnasonth2159 You haven't heard?
@@miyojewoltsnasonth2159 See Hancock's latest presentation for evidence of metallurgy at ca 14 ka.
genuinely very excited about the new hat LOL great pick!!
edit: not to say the original hat isn’t legendary of course
Hahaha thanks!
Nice photo there buddy, you have my compliments.
Gray to see real archaeology! Would be great to improve production 😂
I couldn't make the live stream, listening to it several days later, the sound quality wasn't very good. Even with the speakers and YT volumes set to maximum I was have problems with being able to hear you.
love the content
@Flint Dibble Dr. Dibble, I apologize for missing your live. Since you mentioned reading Plato in the original Greek, is there a grammar text you can recommend for self learning Ancient Greek? I’m unable to take a university course and would love to give it an honest college try on my own. I’m a senior on a limited income but I can still understand what I read, and I’m willing to learn what I can on my own. I thoroughly enjoyed Dr. Raff’s book ‘Origin’.
Hmmm the two main ancient Greek textbooks I know of are Hansen and Quinn and Athenaze. Both have different styles
Hansen and Quinn is dense and very grammatical but gives very clear and explicit descriptions and drills for ancient Greek
Athenaze is more akin to an immersion style, having you start reading right away with modern, simplified versions of ancient Greek stories so that you can start reading right away
The downside to not taking a class is that you can't get guidance or corrections. I believe there are people who offer online tutoring in ancient languages. It could be you could supplement your learning with occasional tutoring to get guidance, corrections, and perspective
@@FlintDibble thank you so very much! I’m off to investigate these books.
...and that's why you should always have MORE THAN ONE HAT AT HAND!
When you (think you) know what's gone wrong with the audio but you aren't watching live and you just end up shouting at your phone 😂
Graham Hancock won me over for like a full year when I first heard his theorys. You and Milo definitely helped me see through his psuedoscience. I'm actually so embarrassed I recommended ancient apocalypse to friends 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Your appearance on Joe Rogan was by far my favorite Joe Rogan episode to date. The way you dismantled him was incredible. That was probably one of the best live debunkings I've seen in my life. It was on par with James Randi and the spoon guy. Thank you for the work you do and I hope to see you on Rogan again.
Also I really enjoyed you on bridges!
Except...Flint either intentionally or accidently omitted the truth about the ice core samples and the seafaring topic. I've listened to both side and Hancock's point isn't debunked. In fact, I believe him even more now. Listen to what he just released on his TH-cam channel.
There is such thing as a natural, instinctive “common sense”. Common sense always grows from experience and learning. So saying it’s “common sense” itself is actually a huge subconscious bias
Can hear you!😊
"what about me? i saw the fall of troy, wwv, i pushed boxes at the boston tea party, now i'm gonna die, in a dungeon... in cardiff!" i'd like to visit cardiff someday
Cardiff is a nice city, but in all honesty Swansea is a "nicer" place to visit with some cool Neolithic sites within The Gower with one site (paviland cave ) dating back to 33,000 BCE.
@@jamierees6824 i should really say i'd like to visit wales, i would love to visit paviland cave! maybe someday
👌 nice hats dude
You could leverage your conection with destiney to get him to help you with audio/video setup. Its like bait for him and its something he knows a lot about. Audio handling by computers can be fairly sophisticated, having a tech do setup can ensure you sound as beautiful as bossible.
Hey Flint. You know the experts? Do you happen know my friend Lars Grundvad? If not, he is worth knowing, and the various finds at Fæsted are amazing.
So laylines don’t exist either? Ffs, I loved the idea of laylines.
Sorry
My bias is Occoms Razor. Horses not zebras. And that people are not all that different from each other.
As someone with a rare immune deficiency that took my primary decades to recognize, at least in medicine, sometimes it _IS_ zebras.
PS: The immune deficiency forum has adopted the zebra as their logo. ^_^
@MossyMozart I have both autism and RA. Talk about zebras. In medicine zebras are horses.
@@penelopemelson3797 - Greetings!
I love you flint
Nooo, I missed it!
Next time!
Hey, it turns out that there is a ton of lead emissions found in ice core samples in both Greenland and Antarctica from the Ice Age. A huge spike, actually. So you either knowingly omitted that from your JRE debate with Hancock or didn't follow enough due diligence. Either way, your assertion on the topic is scientifically flawed. You should probably make a statement about it.
Watch my aftermath video. I address it there. Watch my interview with Danny jones, I address it in detail there
And I will make a reply to his video. Thanks for the comment!
@@FlintDibble Danny Jones? Haven't heard of him but I assume it's a podcast with a relatively equal number of listeners as Joe Rogan, or is that incorrect? Just looked it up...seems JRE has roughly 16x the listeners and almost unquantifiable social advantage, so any misleading information presented as fact on JRE would have an effect in at least one order of magnitude compared to any corrections made on Danny Jones. Hancock has never insinuated that indigenous cultures weren't capable of achieving some of the developments attributed to the forming of civilization, he merely integrates accounts of stories told in ethnographic studies performed by degree-holding anthropologists within the same ethnic group heritage as the subject culture. The accusation that Hancock's work propagates ideas of white supremacy is the very definition of pseudoscience and bias. By my math, whatever corrections you will make about the misinformation you avowed on JRE on this channel will have a 1/571 effect to the damage you've already done. I've been following the debate about an ancient civilization for years and it's become clear there was a global cultural exchange that predates recorded history that "Big Archeology" isn't comfortable with acknowledging. The nature of science is to pose an open-ended question for which the answers are never concrete as new evidence is presented. Your stance regarding ancient advanced humanity with the information at our disposal has forced me to come to view you as a pseudoscientist, more concerned with status quo and funding than research into new perspectives and evidence. The refusal to consider new evidence and cultural correlations by established scholars, like yourself, is perhaps the manifestation of a more heinous "whitewashing" than anything that Hancock suggests. I hope you enjoyed your 15 minutes of fame.
@orionsage7314 they weren't corrections. Claiming what I said was wrong about ice cores is itself wrong
I was right about them. Very clearly and demonstrably right
@@FlintDibble Sure. You said things you knew weren't true. That's how you'll be remembered.
@@orionsage7314 nope. Not one thing. Good luck on your journey
Yes
Until I got into historical TH-camrs like TIK and Cynical Historian, I never considered historiography, which greatly biased my understanding of history
Video games and movies also heavily bias my understanding of history
Video games (specifically strategy games) make it more difficult for me to conceive of a world without nation states. They also make me think things like technological progress is more measurable than it is. Video games (especially multiplayer video games) also tend to portray different cultures nation states and empires in a morally neutral manner (I get it, no one wants to play as a bad guy, but it still probably skews my perspective)
Movies of course narrativizes and individualizes my perspective on history. They make it difficult for me to see certain historical figures as human beings rather than archetypes. They also make me feel like humans have more agency when it comes to historical outcomes than they probably do.
Imagine how many views he’d get if he mentioned Graham😂
He went head to head with Hancock on that Joe Rogan show not long ago.
Then the Hancock sycophants flooded his university with letters demanding that he be fired. He was also _falsely_ accused of violating US federal law by mishandlng Native remains. They were vicious!
I am so glad that Dr Dibble came to TH-cam. Life is way too short to spend a second on pseudo baloney. Reality is so much more enthralling!
Your channels has great potential. Just your personality and curiosity in the subject. Now you just need consistency and time to grow the channel. Wish you well
I have a bias. Archaeologists are all humble seekers of the truth and are free of biases. But you say nobody is free of biases? Damn...scratch that.
I love this guy! Watching from the Philippines!
Very cool see you gaining attention real science deserves
Flint 😂
My bias is towards the academic consensus. I’m willing to go against it with very good evidence. But that is my first point of call to a framework to put the new evidence into
Was there ever an Isrealite civilization In the Americas. I have met people who testify that such a community existed. Where did such and idea come from?
One of the early theories for the existence of native Americans (the peopleing of the Americas basically) was they were the “lost tribes of Israel”. This was like, in the 15th and 16th century, and then Joseph Smith, of Book of Mormon fame, adopted that concept and ran with it and it’s managed to stay in the fringes of public consciousness ever since. The land bridge/Beringia hypothesis started in the 16th century but it wasn’t the dominant theory in public consciousness until like, 100 years ago.
Love the hat.
Too much drama with the microphone makes this much less interesting than it used to be. The second microphone was awful.
Flint head
"Flint head"?
Hi, the sound is bad. Get a grip bro and get a good mike set up x
The sound was poor from 4:15-7:36, but it improved at the latter.
If you left at 4:15, you should come back to watch 7:36 to the end.
*Reply to:* _"Hi, the sound is bad. Get a grip bro and get a good mike set up x"_
I won't bother watching another live stream if you are going to be almost entirely inaudible. When you unnecessarily got up to get your hat you must have knocked something because you were suddenly *FAR* too quiet, muggy and distant. As if the microphone teleported into a bathroom 50 feet away.
If you cannot learn to use your equipment properly your live streams are a waste of time. There's a political channel, _"A Different Bias",_ who has the same problem: high quality videos, utterly appalling live streams. And he shares your arrogance that it's not his fault and there's nothing he can do about it, so we should turn *OUR* volume up.
Funny how it's only an issue on a small number of channels, don't you think?
{:o:O:}
i never said it wasn't my fault, but it wasn't something i could figure out how to solve live on-the-spot, and since people in the chat were telling me to continue because they could hear me with the new mic, i did continue
i've been working on improving my audio, and improving the channel as a whole. but it's a process, and costs money beyond my teacher salary. my experience is archaeology. i'm learning youtubing because people are interested in watching/listening
end point. these technical issues with livestreams will be solved. but given their 'live' nature, sometimes they won't be solved adequately in the moment
My bias is Occoms Razor. Horses not zebras. And that people are not all that different from each other.