Pre-register for King Arthur: Legends Rise now on Google Play or the App Store to earn exclusive rewards including a Legendary Hero at launch ntiny.link/KALR_totalwarbattles @PlayKingArthur #KingArthurLegendsRise
It was after carrhae war that the two empires fought each other for years. The Romans considered the Iranians as their enemy, but they have always remembered the Iranians with respect because of their bravery and fighting. The Romans learned the need for heavy cavalry from the Iranians, and the Iranians also understood that they needed heavy infantry. What is interesting is that these wars never had a final winner and none of them could defeat each other completely
Also, Rome's two greatest soldier statesmen, Caesar and Aurelian, were both stupidly assassinated on the eve of invading Parthia/Persia with two of the best armies ever to march and at the height of their own prowess... And one of Rome's other greatest emperor's, Constantine, died naturally on the eve of taking the the eastern mobile field army into Persia. Constantine was not only a masterful general but, like Aurelian, an inspired cavalryman. And an honorable mention is Hadrian's criminal idiocy of abandoning Trajans conquest of a third of Parthia because he was too cheap and lazy to finish the job. Would have been expensive and required raising a few more legions while crushing the Jewish revolt in Egypt/Judea, but Rome would have won.
@@robruss62 This type of incident happened many times to both sides. For example, the Parthians suffered internal betrayal after Crassus and were forced to return. And keep this in mind, the Parthians were superior in the open field, but they were weak in conquering cities, and the Romans were the opposite. This made them both vulnerable
@bedoonim5701 Yes, the Sassanids fumble after Edessa, and unexpected rising of Odenathus being one such epic wild card that comes to mind. Caesar's invasion would probably have been Rome's other best chance considering the size of his army, his defeat of the Numidians (mini Parthians in being skilled desert cavalryman and horse archers, though not cataphracts), his likely intention of marching through mountainous northerly route that worked for Trajan and Galerius, and his versatility as a general in many types of terrain as well as siege warfare. Ironically Aurelian's aborted descent was timed during a brief lull in the 3rd century chaos for Rome and while Persia was weakened by strife. What's interesting is that in the final round, the Persians came closest to victory by actually conquering Syria and Egypt before Heraclius' victory at Nineveh. While the Islamic tide later halved the East Roman Empire, it utterly destroyed the Sassanids. Both however were still recovering from their last and most debilitating war,
Caracalla had organised a wedding between the daughter of the Parthian king and himself to end any war between the empires but it was a trap and during the wedding feast the Roman’s attacked the Parthians and killed many. The Parthian king managed to escape. Like the red weddings in game of thrones. The Romans had no honour and this war was in revenge for the treachery of the Romans.
@@valorwarrior7628 The Parthians stopped a Roman invasion, almost broke the professional Roman army with an army of mostly mercenaries or locals and the Romans literally paid a tribute of 200,000,000 Sestertius to the Parthians, how is that not gaining anything ? What you just described is actually the last Sassanid Byzantine war
@@paprskomet Nur sind die Brustplatten aus Bronze oder Buntmetall. Die auf diesen Kettenhemden im 3. Jahrhundert getragen wurden. Einzigartig und tauchen meines Wissens in anderen Zeiträumen nicht auf.
In conclusion: the Romans after the battle would soon have a series of weak emperors and poor economic and social management, paving the way for the crisis of the third century, however the Parthians, fratricidal dynastic disputes and invasions of nomads from the east, would end to make room for Ardashir I to defeat Artabanus in Hormozdgan in 224 and Vologasses V in 226 and so the Sassanids entered the game and would become one of the most important players in the crisis of the third century.
Looks like Macrinus had the Parthians on the ropes, he severely damaged the Parthians prime Main body of veteran soldiers,the Heavy Cataphracts,which I think they used what was called Caltrops,used all the way until the beginning of Pike and Shot tactics in the late 16th century to the beginning of the 17th century, hand sized 3 sided pointed spike which ever way you threw it a spike pointed up, horses stepped on it threw the rider off, their Morale was probably broken when the Roman best veteran Units attacked them,the Heavy Infantry.The Parthians had nothing still in fighting shape except the light Cavalry Archers and some of their Camel Riders,not much of an Army,plus the Roman Cavalry was still in top fighting form and suffered little casualties.If it was me I would of finished destroying the Parthian Army,the Romans had the edge, their Veteran Heavy Infantry in better fighting shape and better Morale even though they had Heavy Casualties, Roman Heavy Infantry can take it if they see their enemy getting their ass wiped, plus a better more experienced Commander than the Parthians.
@@Richard-s2n7c If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
His Heavies """WERE NOT LOCALS or MERCENARIES""" that was his First Rate Troops,they got massacred, you unseat a Heavy Cavalry Trooper like that, to fight on the ground, they are more useless than a bowman. So the Persians lose their best Troops, the Romans , taking heavy casualties due to long range missile firing for their light Cavalry. The Roman Heavy Infantry and Heavy Cavalry , their Best Troops were still largely Intact, """I""" would ofused the true and tested old school Roman Turtle, retreated my Infantry to a better less open more narrower defence and had my Cavalry cut around the Persians sight unseen, would of used more Caltrops to prevent the enemy light Cavalry getting closer for better Missile Range and if you know anything about """LOGISTICS""" Bowed Horsemen in any period carried only so much arrows . What your doing son is basing your reply on this story, animation, could not have been that bad since the farther back you go less things are written down less detail. all I,m going is the """COMMANDERS""' the Romans had the more experienced one, the other just a plain King, second the Romans Destroyed the Persians first rate Troops,the Romans still had theirs in good fighting order. Don,t forget you can break a Unit or Army but they can break and fall back in good order and reform themselves to """STEADY""". Anyway , I always have had a """EXTREMELY LOW OPINION""" of that area ,its people and its history and specially its """MILITARY""",specially when that part of the country became muslim, Those people carry a Large """"YELLOW STREAK ON THEIR BACKS""".I give much more Respect to """ZULUS""" fighting tactics and ability than I do them.Greetings from a """ROMANIAN"""
@@Richard-s2n7c Holy YAP Nice imagination though Copy paste : At this point, Macrinus, with his army on the verge of breaking, sent another embassy to Artabanus, informing him of Caracalla's demise and offering a substantial compensation. The Parthian army had also suffered large casualties, and moreover, since it was not a professional but a feudal militia force, it had started to become restive at the prolonged campaign Copy paste : Thus Artabanus agreed to a peace, after receiving 200 million sesterces
Roman infantry DO HAVE Roman shields.If your hollywood imagination about the Romans is limited just on rectangular model of shields no wonder that you incorrectly imagine Romans using only that type of shield.
@@mikelmeadows6254 Shields you see here became dominantly used model in the Roman army between 150-200 AD and remained the most commonly used type for many centuries afterwards.
@@mikelmeadows6254 Das sind Tatsächlich noch Ovale Parma die Abgerundet wurden. In Dura Europos haben Archäologen Noch ein sehr gut erhaltendes Modell dieses Schildtypus gefunden. Dazu wollte ich auf meinen Kanal noch ein Video machen.
This was a true dance of military manouvers and tactics between cavalry and infantry. Tactically it would be a really good draw for both sides only if Macrinus wasn't in a hurry for an Imperial throne
If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
Agree with you, interesting how the creator chose to describe the battle and portray the battle as arguably in favor or Rome. Then at the end somehow the story changes to…the Romans suing for peace? Lol
@@SolomonZeef It wasn't Look at their satrapy during the Achaemenid empire And look at their kingdom during the Seleucid empire Parni came from north of central Asia
@@ramtin5152 they were Eastern Iranian people, Afghans are literally Eastern Iranian peoples, and according to cambridge sources they were Afghans, there is a movie (the breadwinner) about Taliban, and one talib says we were parthain before.
@TheLibraryChamber I know it's part of history but what is the outcome of the battle, what the both sides have earned after this battle, plus I don't even watch SpongeBob
The Parthians stopped the Roman invasion, won the battle, saved their realm and the Romans paid them a tribute equal to the total wealth of the richest man during the period of the Roman republic, Crassus I wouldn't say it was for nothing
Pre-register for King Arthur: Legends Rise now on Google Play or the App Store to earn exclusive rewards including a Legendary Hero at launch ntiny.link/KALR_totalwarbattles @PlayKingArthur #KingArthurLegendsRise
It was after carrhae war that the two empires fought each other for years.
The Romans considered the Iranians as their enemy, but they have always remembered the Iranians with respect because of their bravery and fighting.
The Romans learned the need for heavy cavalry from the Iranians, and the Iranians also understood that they needed heavy infantry.
What is interesting is that these wars never had a final winner and none of them could defeat each other completely
Because they were too big and too many enemys in each front
The winners of this hopeless war of hateful empires were the Arabs.
Also, Rome's two greatest soldier statesmen, Caesar and Aurelian, were both stupidly assassinated on the eve of invading Parthia/Persia with two of the best armies ever to march and at the height of their own prowess...
And one of Rome's other greatest emperor's, Constantine, died naturally on the eve of taking the the eastern mobile field army into Persia. Constantine was not only a masterful general but, like Aurelian, an inspired cavalryman.
And an honorable mention is Hadrian's criminal idiocy of abandoning Trajans conquest of a third of Parthia because he was too cheap and lazy to finish the job. Would have been expensive and required raising a few more legions while crushing the Jewish revolt in Egypt/Judea, but Rome would have won.
@@robruss62 This type of incident happened many times to both sides.
For example, the Parthians suffered internal betrayal after Crassus and were forced to return.
And keep this in mind, the Parthians were superior in the open field, but they were weak in conquering cities, and the Romans were the opposite.
This made them both vulnerable
@bedoonim5701 Yes, the Sassanids fumble after Edessa, and unexpected rising of Odenathus being one such epic wild card that comes to mind.
Caesar's invasion would probably have been Rome's other best chance considering the size of his army, his defeat of the Numidians (mini Parthians in being skilled desert cavalryman and horse archers, though not cataphracts), his likely intention of marching through mountainous northerly route that worked for Trajan and Galerius, and his versatility as a general in many types of terrain as well as siege warfare.
Ironically Aurelian's aborted descent was timed during a brief lull in the 3rd century chaos for Rome and while Persia was weakened by strife.
What's interesting is that in the final round, the Persians came closest to victory by actually conquering Syria and Egypt before Heraclius' victory at Nineveh. While the Islamic tide later halved the East Roman Empire, it utterly destroyed the Sassanids. Both however were still recovering from their last and most debilitating war,
wake up babe new bellum et historia vid
Caracalla had organised a wedding between the daughter of the Parthian king and himself to end any war between the empires but it was a trap and during the wedding feast the Roman’s attacked the Parthians and killed many. The Parthian king managed to escape. Like the red weddings in game of thrones. The Romans had no honour and this war was in revenge for the treachery of the Romans.
Cavalry archers 💪🏻
Everything has pros and cons
Cataphracts🤜🏻
@@HistoricalWeaponstrue
Thank you for this ❤❤❤
Nice vid man
A channel that is like gold 📍🥇
why no farya faraji music? i liked it when you used his music in the beginning when soldiers were marching
He has great music
best historical total war channel
Finally, a pitch draw battle between Romans and Persians with no sides gaining or losing.
@@valorwarrior7628 The Parthians stopped a Roman invasion, almost broke the professional Roman army with an army of mostly mercenaries or locals and the Romans literally paid a tribute of 200,000,000 Sestertius to the Parthians, how is that not gaining anything ?
What you just described is actually the last Sassanid Byzantine war
@@ramtin5152 also, you forgot the fact that the Sassanids also crippled the Romans allowing the Persians under Shapur II to invade Anatolia and Egypt.
Still patiently waiting for Bellum et Historia to finally make and upload a video about the underrated battle of Anglon 543 AD
Another fantastic video
Great video❤
I absolutely adore the mailhoods wore by III rd century legionaries
They were worn both before and after 3rd century as well.
@@paprskomet Nur sind die Brustplatten aus Bronze oder Buntmetall. Die auf diesen Kettenhemden im 3. Jahrhundert getragen wurden. Einzigartig und tauchen meines Wissens in anderen Zeiträumen nicht auf.
Great battle
Same thing that happened to licinius crassus in 53bc at the battle of carrhae with Surena Pathaia
امپراطوری اشکانیان ایران بزرگ
Yes!!!
Battle of Ctesiphon would be nice to see
Welche?
A video about the battle of Ctesiphon 233 AD during Ardashir Babakan's reign or the one fought in 263 AD would be great
Can you make some videos from the Pike and Shot era? And the Greek independence war?
Dafür müsste man erstmal eine Funktionierende Total War Mod haben. Die in diesen Zeiträumen spielt.
@MarschallHstory gibt es
@@frederikbeckers8923 Interessant das habe Ich nicht Mitbekommen. Für welchen teil den?
@MarschallHstory empire total war und Napoleon
@@frederikbeckers8923 Ah.
Can you do the battle of lechfeld
"Parthian archers are dealt a heavy blow"
Proceeds to show cavalry flank infantry istead of archers being shot by pillas
🔥🔥
In conclusion: the Romans after the battle would soon have a series of weak emperors and poor economic and social management, paving the way for the crisis of the third century, however the Parthians, fratricidal dynastic disputes and invasions of nomads from the east, would end to make room for Ardashir I to defeat Artabanus in Hormozdgan in 224 and Vologasses V in 226 and so the Sassanids entered the game and would become one of the most important players in the crisis of the third century.
Now do the Lydian-Persian war
That war was one of the iconic battle during the reign of the Parthian empire. Could you make a video about the battle of callinicum?
What configuration hawe in comp?
Poderia fazer uma batalha entre os elfos da floresta das trevas vs os anões das colinas de ferro
Am I the first person to think that this narrator sounds a little bit like Matt Berry (IT Crowd)? 😂
Can you about video war British Empire vs Japanese emperor
iran is powerful❤
کوجایی هستی من ایرانی هستم ما ایرانی ها
تاریخ برزگ وخو داریم
Anya anyar
What mod was used for this battle?
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Wich mod did you use for reskin romans
Is this channel by the same voice actor from rome 2???
no lol, the voices are very similar though
Mods?
Viva os Persas..viva o Irã.
Hit and Run - Mongol Tactics ? 🧐
Lured into the desert with little mobility and no logic of local conditions ? Hubris on top of it ? 🤨
Un video sobre la guerra ruso-bizantina
8:59 they can't see the big ass sticks
Glory Of Persian Empire
@@persianwarrior2048 *Parthian
Looks like Macrinus had the Parthians on the ropes, he severely damaged the Parthians prime Main body of veteran soldiers,the Heavy Cataphracts,which I think they used what was called Caltrops,used all the way until the beginning of Pike and Shot tactics in the late 16th century to the beginning of the 17th century, hand sized 3 sided pointed spike which ever way you threw it a spike pointed up, horses stepped on it threw the rider off, their Morale was probably broken when the Roman best veteran Units attacked them,the Heavy Infantry.The Parthians had nothing still in fighting shape except the light Cavalry Archers and some of their Camel Riders,not much of an Army,plus the Roman Cavalry was still in top fighting form and suffered little casualties.If it was me I would of finished destroying the Parthian Army,the Romans had the edge, their Veteran Heavy Infantry in better fighting shape and better Morale even though they had Heavy Casualties, Roman Heavy Infantry can take it if they see their enemy getting their ass wiped, plus a better more experienced Commander than the Parthians.
@@Richard-s2n7c If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses
The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle
Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
His Heavies """WERE NOT LOCALS or MERCENARIES""" that was his First Rate Troops,they got massacred, you unseat a Heavy Cavalry Trooper like that, to fight on the ground, they are more useless than a bowman. So the Persians lose their best Troops, the Romans , taking heavy casualties due to long range missile firing for their light Cavalry. The Roman Heavy Infantry and Heavy Cavalry , their Best Troops were still largely Intact, """I""" would ofused the true and tested old school Roman Turtle, retreated my Infantry to a better less open more narrower defence and had my Cavalry cut around the Persians sight unseen, would of used more Caltrops to prevent the enemy light Cavalry getting closer for better Missile Range and if you know anything about """LOGISTICS""" Bowed Horsemen in any period carried only so much arrows . What your doing son is basing your reply on this story, animation, could not have been that bad since the farther back you go less things are written down less detail. all I,m going is the """COMMANDERS""' the Romans had the more experienced one, the other just a plain King, second the Romans Destroyed the Persians first rate Troops,the Romans still had theirs in good fighting order. Don,t forget you can break a Unit or Army but they can break and fall back in good order and reform themselves to """STEADY""". Anyway , I always have had a """EXTREMELY LOW OPINION""" of that area ,its people and its history and specially its """MILITARY""",specially when that part of the country became muslim, Those people carry a Large """"YELLOW STREAK ON THEIR BACKS""".I give much more Respect to """ZULUS""" fighting tactics and ability than I do them.Greetings from a """ROMANIAN"""
@@Richard-s2n7c Holy YAP
Nice imagination though
Copy paste : At this point, Macrinus, with his army on the verge of breaking, sent another embassy to Artabanus, informing him of Caracalla's demise and offering a substantial compensation. The Parthian army had also suffered large casualties, and moreover, since it was not a professional but a feudal militia force, it had started to become restive at the prolonged campaign
Copy paste : Thus Artabanus agreed to a peace, after receiving 200 million sesterces
トラヤヌス帝VSパルティア！
🌿🦅🌿👍
Actually it was Sassanids
به امپراطورهای روم بگید صبر کنند شاهشاهی ساسانی داره میاد شاپور بزرگ شکارچی قاچ امپراطورهای روم تنها شاهی توجهان که توانست ۳امپراطور امپراطوری روم رو بزنه بترکونه☑️😂😂❤#💚🇹🇯💞🇮🇷🌹🇦🇫
Why doesn't the Roman infantry have Roman Shields?
Roman infantry DO HAVE Roman shields.If your hollywood imagination about the Romans is limited just on rectangular model of shields no wonder that you incorrectly imagine Romans using only that type of shield.
@paprskomet there were a lot of different Roman shield types but I can't find any round ones for the standard infantry
@@mikelmeadows6254 Shields you see here became dominantly used model in the Roman army between 150-200 AD and remained the most commonly used type for many centuries afterwards.
@@mikelmeadows6254 Das sind Tatsächlich noch Ovale Parma die Abgerundet wurden. In Dura Europos haben Archäologen Noch ein sehr gut erhaltendes Modell dieses Schildtypus gefunden. Dazu wollte ich auf meinen Kanal noch ein Video machen.
This was a true dance of military manouvers and tactics between cavalry and infantry. Tactically it would be a really good draw for both sides only if Macrinus wasn't in a hurry for an Imperial throne
👏
what game is this?
🤦
Total War Rome II.
@@MarschallHstory but the game dosent look like that dose he use mods or what?
@@fah6345 Er verwendet glaube ich die Restitutor Orbis Mod. Die, die Römischen Einheiten im Dividet Empire DLC Reskindt.
@@MarschallHstory only one mode right? and also thanks brother
Parthian empire 🇦🇫
Parthians from Iran and iranic. Dont rob
@@mhrnothing4580
🇺🇦🤜🏻🇮🇷💩🕋🤛🏻🇮🇱
Their homeland wasn't in Afghanistan, it was in north east of Iran
@@ramtin5152 They were Pashtuns decent from Scythian they moved from Europe their descendants are afghans Eastern iranic
@@mhrnothing4580 parthians are eastern iranic 🇦🇬🇦🇫🇹🇯
If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses
The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle
Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
Agree with you, interesting how the creator chose to describe the battle and portray the battle as arguably in favor or Rome. Then at the end somehow the story changes to…the Romans suing for peace? Lol
En gros les romains on perdu contre les perses, quel honte
Please hindi dubing please
🇮🇷👑
They were Eastern Iranian parni tribe invaded parthai and make parthai empire , they were from Afghanistan
@@SolomonZeef They weren't from Afghanistan, they came from the great steppes
@@ramtin5152 it's not my point, every Iranian are Came from their, my point is their Homeland was Afghanistan.
@@SolomonZeef It wasn't
Look at their satrapy during the Achaemenid empire
And look at their kingdom during the Seleucid empire
Parni came from north of central Asia
@@ramtin5152 they were Eastern Iranian people, Afghans are literally Eastern Iranian peoples, and according to cambridge sources they were Afghans, there is a movie (the breadwinner) about Taliban, and one talib says we were parthain before.
I do not watch ANY advertisements. An ad comes on the video … I leave.
Cool 👌
More ads than content - I'm out!
👍🏻
Will you ever show a roman victory or do you just hate them?
😂😂
😂😂😂
The shadow of Rome is vast.
this battle was a draw...
This battle was a draw, were you paying attention?
Иранская парфянская 😂. Расмешил
Turk?😂
😂😂😂😂@@eran8513
بایدم فشار بخوری😂😂🐴
@@steppetm6374 Because they ARE Iranian
They were Eastern Iranian according to combrighe they were Afghans
So thousands of people die in this worthless battle?
why are you even here?
Its a part of history so not useless. thats just your serious lack of understanding. Go back to watching Sponge Bob.
@TheLibraryChamber I know it's part of history but what is the outcome of the battle, what the both sides have earned after this battle, plus I don't even watch SpongeBob
@TotalWarHistory. Learning who to make a cake
The Parthians stopped the Roman invasion, won the battle, saved their realm and the Romans paid them a tribute equal to the total wealth of the richest man during the period of the Roman republic, Crassus
I wouldn't say it was for nothing
Please stop using total war for fuck sakes