Pre-register for King Arthur: Legends Rise now on Google Play or the App Store to earn exclusive rewards including a Legendary Hero at launch ntiny.link/KALR_totalwarbattles @PlayKingArthur #KingArthurLegendsRise
It was after carrhae war that the two empires fought each other for years. The Romans considered the Iranians as their enemy, but they have always remembered the Iranians with respect because of their bravery and fighting. The Romans learned the need for heavy cavalry from the Iranians, and the Iranians also understood that they needed heavy infantry. What is interesting is that these wars never had a final winner and none of them could defeat each other completely
Also, Rome's two greatest soldier statesmen, Caesar and Aurelian, were both stupidly assassinated on the eve of invading Parthia/Persia with two of the best armies ever to march and at the height of their own prowess... And one of Rome's other greatest emperor's, Constantine, died naturally on the eve of taking the the eastern mobile field army into Persia. Constantine was not only a masterful general but, like Aurelian, an inspired cavalryman. And an honorable mention is Hadrian's criminal idiocy of abandoning Trajans conquest of a third of Parthia because he was too cheap and lazy to finish the job. Would have been expensive and required raising a few more legions while crushing the Jewish revolt in Egypt/Judea, but Rome would have won.
@@robruss62 This type of incident happened many times to both sides. For example, the Parthians suffered internal betrayal after Crassus and were forced to return. And keep this in mind, the Parthians were superior in the open field, but they were weak in conquering cities, and the Romans were the opposite. This made them both vulnerable
@bedoonim5701 Yes, the Sassanids fumble after Edessa, and unexpected rising of Odenathus being one such epic wild card that comes to mind. Caesar's invasion would probably have been Rome's other best chance considering the size of his army, his defeat of the Numidians (mini Parthians in being skilled desert cavalryman and horse archers, though not cataphracts), his likely intention of marching through mountainous northerly route that worked for Trajan and Galerius, and his versatility as a general in many types of terrain as well as siege warfare. Ironically Aurelian's aborted descent was timed during a brief lull in the 3rd century chaos for Rome and while Persia was weakened by strife. What's interesting is that in the final round, the Persians came closest to victory by actually conquering Syria and Egypt before Heraclius' victory at Nineveh. While the Islamic tide later halved the East Roman Empire, it utterly destroyed the Sassanids. Both however were still recovering from their last and most debilitating war,
Caracalla had organised a wedding between the daughter of the Parthian king and himself to end any war between the empires but it was a trap and during the wedding feast the Roman’s attacked the Parthians and killed many. The Parthian king managed to escape. Like the red weddings in game of thrones. The Romans had no honour and this war was in revenge for the treachery of the Romans.
@@paprskomet Nur sind die Brustplatten aus Bronze oder Buntmetall. Die auf diesen Kettenhemden im 3. Jahrhundert getragen wurden. Einzigartig und tauchen meines Wissens in anderen Zeiträumen nicht auf.
“The Persians arrows flew with such force and precision that they seemed to darken the sky, and the Romans could neither escape nor retaliate effectively.” “They [the Parthians] did not engage at close quarters, as the Romans desired, but kept riding around them, shooting from afar; and they inflicted wounds upon their enemies of which no notice was taken at the time, but from which they later perished.” -Plutarch, and Cassius Dio.
@@valorwarrior7628 The Parthians stopped a Roman invasion, almost broke the professional Roman army with an army of mostly mercenaries or locals and the Romans literally paid a tribute of 200,000,000 Sestertius to the Parthians, how is that not gaining anything ? What you just described is actually the last Sassanid Byzantine war
Re 08:00 an on: the spikes were MUCH smaller than shown in the video. 5 inch or 12 cm wide at most. They were meant to be nasty to horses hooves and soldiers' feet. The vid shows spikes like in Normandy on D-Day 1944 when their function was to thwart the advancement of vehicles over the beach.
The depiction of the spikes is ridiculously wrong. They would be caltrops, iron tripods with 4 spikes, each about 3 inches (7.5cm) long, which no matter how it fell one spike always faced upwards. They were barbed, so when a horse or camel trod on it, the animal was crippled. Also, the Romans would have used the oblong scutum (shield) which could be used to cover the front and top of the legionnaries' formation in the "testudo" (turtle) to protect against arrows.
In conclusion: the Romans after the battle would soon have a series of weak emperors and poor economic and social management, paving the way for the crisis of the third century, however the Parthians, fratricidal dynastic disputes and invasions of nomads from the east, would end to make room for Ardashir I to defeat Artabanus in Hormozdgan in 224 and Vologasses V in 226 and so the Sassanids entered the game and would become one of the most important players in the crisis of the third century.
No, the Parthians were not “Iranians” in the modern sense of belonging to the current nation state of Iran, but they were an Iranian people in the ethnic and linguistic sense
the 'spikes' left by the 'retreating' Romans are 'caltrops', about the size of a baseball. Hard to see, the horses step on them, laming them instantly and decimating the cavalry.
There was no Iranian empire in 217 AD pretty sad when people put history blogs up without the proper knowledge. Perhaps he's talking about the Persian empire.
@@pickleonions4277 The Parthians were Iranian people like the Persians Not all Iranians were/are Persian These two are literally cousins There were always different branches
@@SolomonZeef It wasn't Look at their satrapy during the Achaemenid empire And look at their kingdom during the Seleucid empire Parni came from north of central Asia
@@ramtin5152 they were Eastern Iranian people, Afghans are literally Eastern Iranian peoples, and according to cambridge sources they were Afghans, there is a movie (the breadwinner) about Taliban, and one talib says we were parthain before.
This was a true dance of military manouvers and tactics between cavalry and infantry. Tactically it would be a really good draw for both sides only if Macrinus wasn't in a hurry for an Imperial throne
@paprskomet The spartha is the longer, Roman cavalry sword. The infantry used a shorter "gladius" in a stabbing motion. You can see that the Roman infantry are using a longer sword, predominantly in a slashing motion.
@@brianjones5379 Spatha not "Spartha".Why you continue to wite it incorrectly.It is Spatha not "Spartha"(no connection to Spartans). As you was already told "gladius" onle means "sword" in translation. For the Romans it was never typollogical word reserved just to short hispanic swords.They obviously called as "gladius" any sword regardless type,shape or lenght. Even spathae were commonly refered simply with word "Gladius". Hispanic sword was in reality used both for stabbing and slashing and was effective in both(and clearly designed for both). It is popular misconception that it was for stabbing only. Spatha was also used very much like hispanic swords regarless longer blade. In fact some hispanic swords had blade long basically the same as some of spathae models.
The Parthian empire was dying politically, but still had a strong military. The Romans should have sided with the rebel faction in Parthia. At the time there were 2 factions, not including the future founder of the Sassanid empire Ardashir I.
Roman infantry DO HAVE Roman shields.If your hollywood imagination about the Romans is limited just on rectangular model of shields no wonder that you incorrectly imagine Romans using only that type of shield.
@@mikelmeadows6254 Shields you see here became dominantly used model in the Roman army between 150-200 AD and remained the most commonly used type for many centuries afterwards.
@@mikelmeadows6254 Das sind Tatsächlich noch Ovale Parma die Abgerundet wurden. In Dura Europos haben Archäologen Noch ein sehr gut erhaltendes Modell dieses Schildtypus gefunden. Dazu wollte ich auf meinen Kanal noch ein Video machen.
Looks like Macrinus had the Parthians on the ropes, he severely damaged the Parthians prime Main body of veteran soldiers,the Heavy Cataphracts,which I think they used what was called Caltrops,used all the way until the beginning of Pike and Shot tactics in the late 16th century to the beginning of the 17th century, hand sized 3 sided pointed spike which ever way you threw it a spike pointed up, horses stepped on it threw the rider off, their Morale was probably broken when the Roman best veteran Units attacked them,the Heavy Infantry.The Parthians had nothing still in fighting shape except the light Cavalry Archers and some of their Camel Riders,not much of an Army,plus the Roman Cavalry was still in top fighting form and suffered little casualties.If it was me I would of finished destroying the Parthian Army,the Romans had the edge, their Veteran Heavy Infantry in better fighting shape and better Morale even though they had Heavy Casualties, Roman Heavy Infantry can take it if they see their enemy getting their ass wiped, plus a better more experienced Commander than the Parthians.
@@Richard-s2n7c If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
His Heavies """WERE NOT LOCALS or MERCENARIES""" that was his First Rate Troops,they got massacred, you unseat a Heavy Cavalry Trooper like that, to fight on the ground, they are more useless than a bowman. So the Persians lose their best Troops, the Romans , taking heavy casualties due to long range missile firing for their light Cavalry. The Roman Heavy Infantry and Heavy Cavalry , their Best Troops were still largely Intact, """I""" would ofused the true and tested old school Roman Turtle, retreated my Infantry to a better less open more narrower defence and had my Cavalry cut around the Persians sight unseen, would of used more Caltrops to prevent the enemy light Cavalry getting closer for better Missile Range and if you know anything about """LOGISTICS""" Bowed Horsemen in any period carried only so much arrows . What your doing son is basing your reply on this story, animation, could not have been that bad since the farther back you go less things are written down less detail. all I,m going is the """COMMANDERS""' the Romans had the more experienced one, the other just a plain King, second the Romans Destroyed the Persians first rate Troops,the Romans still had theirs in good fighting order. Don,t forget you can break a Unit or Army but they can break and fall back in good order and reform themselves to """STEADY""". Anyway , I always have had a """EXTREMELY LOW OPINION""" of that area ,its people and its history and specially its """MILITARY""",specially when that part of the country became muslim, Those people carry a Large """"YELLOW STREAK ON THEIR BACKS""".I give much more Respect to """ZULUS""" fighting tactics and ability than I do them.Greetings from a """ROMANIAN"""
@@Richard-s2n7c Holy YAP Nice imagination though Copy paste : At this point, Macrinus, with his army on the verge of breaking, sent another embassy to Artabanus, informing him of Caracalla's demise and offering a substantial compensation. The Parthian army had also suffered large casualties, and moreover, since it was not a professional but a feudal militia force, it had started to become restive at the prolonged campaign Copy paste : Thus Artabanus agreed to a peace, after receiving 200 million sesterces
Macrinus wasnt white he was born Caesarea Mauretaniae modern day Algeria (before Arab invasion) Its a known historical fact please get this correct when portraying these people.
If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
Agree with you, interesting how the creator chose to describe the battle and portray the battle as arguably in favor or Rome. Then at the end somehow the story changes to…the Romans suing for peace? Lol
this video is full of your stupid comments that continue to ignore the bigger picture and you want to be right at all costs. you keep saying "an army made up of locals and mercenaries" as if that were an excuse and as if they were less capable than the romans, stop ideologizing historical facts to accommodate your political opinions. the romans and the parthians fought each other for centuries and were perhaps among the greatest enemies of the ancient world, if you love history you don't change it to your liking. the roman conquest stopped for dozens of other reasons not just for this battle, and let's stop creating "good and bad" with historical empires, they were fucking empires, and you should have a minimum of dignity. I would also like to know where you got your information, because depending on the authors and the historical findings you read, the "truth" changes completely, also macrinus paid a tribute because the political situation in rome was desperate and he had to make sure to end that war front. The Parthians had great victories against Rome, this one cannot be considered as such, Rome also had its victories against the Parthians, such as in 53 BC in Mount Gindaro.
You can't send an envoy for peace during a battle. The Romans and Parthians must have reached a stalemate, and at the end of the battle Macrinus must have assessed that the losses were too high: Artabanus' army was probably larger than the Roman one and the determination of the Parthians must have discouraged Macrinus. Macrinus therefore sued for peace.
@TheLibraryChamber I know it's part of history but what is the outcome of the battle, what the both sides have earned after this battle, plus I don't even watch SpongeBob
The Parthians stopped the Roman invasion, won the battle, saved their realm and the Romans paid them a tribute equal to the total wealth of the richest man during the period of the Roman republic, Crassus I wouldn't say it was for nothing
Note the careful language when explaining a Parthian defeat. Thats the English in you. Absolutely TERRIFIED someone will think your racist . Parthians will soon be victorious in all these wars
Pre-register for King Arthur: Legends Rise now on Google Play or the App Store to earn exclusive rewards including a Legendary Hero at launch ntiny.link/KALR_totalwarbattles @PlayKingArthur #KingArthurLegendsRise
It was after carrhae war that the two empires fought each other for years.
The Romans considered the Iranians as their enemy, but they have always remembered the Iranians with respect because of their bravery and fighting.
The Romans learned the need for heavy cavalry from the Iranians, and the Iranians also understood that they needed heavy infantry.
What is interesting is that these wars never had a final winner and none of them could defeat each other completely
Because they were too big and too many enemys in each front
The winners of this hopeless war of hateful empires were the Arabs.
Also, Rome's two greatest soldier statesmen, Caesar and Aurelian, were both stupidly assassinated on the eve of invading Parthia/Persia with two of the best armies ever to march and at the height of their own prowess...
And one of Rome's other greatest emperor's, Constantine, died naturally on the eve of taking the the eastern mobile field army into Persia. Constantine was not only a masterful general but, like Aurelian, an inspired cavalryman.
And an honorable mention is Hadrian's criminal idiocy of abandoning Trajans conquest of a third of Parthia because he was too cheap and lazy to finish the job. Would have been expensive and required raising a few more legions while crushing the Jewish revolt in Egypt/Judea, but Rome would have won.
@@robruss62 This type of incident happened many times to both sides.
For example, the Parthians suffered internal betrayal after Crassus and were forced to return.
And keep this in mind, the Parthians were superior in the open field, but they were weak in conquering cities, and the Romans were the opposite.
This made them both vulnerable
@bedoonim5701 Yes, the Sassanids fumble after Edessa, and unexpected rising of Odenathus being one such epic wild card that comes to mind.
Caesar's invasion would probably have been Rome's other best chance considering the size of his army, his defeat of the Numidians (mini Parthians in being skilled desert cavalryman and horse archers, though not cataphracts), his likely intention of marching through mountainous northerly route that worked for Trajan and Galerius, and his versatility as a general in many types of terrain as well as siege warfare.
Ironically Aurelian's aborted descent was timed during a brief lull in the 3rd century chaos for Rome and while Persia was weakened by strife.
What's interesting is that in the final round, the Persians came closest to victory by actually conquering Syria and Egypt before Heraclius' victory at Nineveh. While the Islamic tide later halved the East Roman Empire, it utterly destroyed the Sassanids. Both however were still recovering from their last and most debilitating war,
Thank you very much for putting Persian subtitles in all your videos. ❤
best historical total war channel
The sound of these kind of battles must have been awesome.
Caracalla had organised a wedding between the daughter of the Parthian king and himself to end any war between the empires but it was a trap and during the wedding feast the Roman’s attacked the Parthians and killed many. The Parthian king managed to escape. Like the red weddings in game of thrones. The Romans had no honour and this war was in revenge for the treachery of the Romans.
Thank you for this ❤❤❤
EXCELLENT! What a wonderful channel. So glad I found you.!🥃🥃🥃🥃🥃
😎
wake up babe new bellum et historia vid
Cavalry archers 💪🏻
Everything has pros and cons
Cataphracts🤜🏻
@@HistoricalWeaponstrue
A channel that is like gold 📍🥇
man i still love some Rome 2 total war content thanks
This was a badass battle.
Nice vid man
I absolutely adore the mailhoods wore by III rd century legionaries
They were worn both before and after 3rd century as well.
@@paprskomet Nur sind die Brustplatten aus Bronze oder Buntmetall. Die auf diesen Kettenhemden im 3. Jahrhundert getragen wurden. Einzigartig und tauchen meines Wissens in anderen Zeiträumen nicht auf.
Another fantastic video
Great video❤
why no farya faraji music? i liked it when you used his music in the beginning when soldiers were marching
He has great music
4:30 Lol that sneeze adds so much to the realism
Great battle
Yes!!!
“The Persians arrows flew with such force and precision that they seemed to darken the sky, and the Romans could neither escape nor retaliate effectively.”
“They [the Parthians] did not engage at close quarters, as the Romans desired, but kept riding around them, shooting from afar; and they inflicted wounds upon their enemies of which no notice was taken at the time, but from which they later perished.”
-Plutarch, and Cassius Dio.
Finally, a pitch draw battle between Romans and Persians with no sides gaining or losing.
@@valorwarrior7628 The Parthians stopped a Roman invasion, almost broke the professional Roman army with an army of mostly mercenaries or locals and the Romans literally paid a tribute of 200,000,000 Sestertius to the Parthians, how is that not gaining anything ?
What you just described is actually the last Sassanid Byzantine war
@@ramtin5152 also, you forgot the fact that the Sassanids also crippled the Romans allowing the Persians under Shapur II to invade Anatolia and Egypt.
Can you do the battle of lechfeld
Can you make some videos from the Pike and Shot era? And the Greek independence war?
Dafür müsste man erstmal eine Funktionierende Total War Mod haben. Die in diesen Zeiträumen spielt.
@MarschallHstory gibt es
@@frederikbeckers8923 Interessant das habe Ich nicht Mitbekommen. Für welchen teil den?
@MarschallHstory empire total war und Napoleon
@@frederikbeckers8923 Ah.
Battle of Ctesiphon would be nice to see
Welche?
A video about the battle of Ctesiphon 233 AD during Ardashir Babakan's reign or the one fought in 263 AD would be great
トラヤヌス帝VSパルティア！
Re 08:00 an on: the spikes were MUCH smaller than shown in the video. 5 inch or 12 cm wide at most. They were meant to be nasty to horses hooves and soldiers' feet. The vid shows spikes like in Normandy on D-Day 1944 when their function was to thwart the advancement of vehicles over the beach.
Rome II engine.
کوجایی هستی من ایرانی هستم ما ایرانی ها
تاریخ برزگ وخو داریم
Anya anyar
Same thing that happened to licinius crassus in 53bc at the battle of carrhae with Surena Pathaia
Not really the same thing.
Still patiently waiting for Bellum et Historia to finally make and upload a video about the underrated battle of Anglon 543 AD
به امپراطورهای روم بگید صبر کنند شاهشاهی ساسانی داره میاد شاپور بزرگ شکارچی قاچ امپراطورهای روم تنها شاهی توجهان که توانست ۳امپراطور امپراطوری روم رو بزنه بترکونه☑️😂😂❤#💚🇹🇯💞🇮🇷🌹🇦🇫
And people are still fighting over that pile of dust 😮
The depiction of the spikes is ridiculously wrong. They would be caltrops, iron tripods with 4 spikes, each about 3 inches (7.5cm) long, which no matter how it fell one spike always faced upwards. They were barbed, so when a horse or camel trod on it, the animal was crippled.
Also, the Romans would have used the oblong scutum (shield) which could be used to cover the front and top of the legionnaries' formation in the "testudo" (turtle) to protect against arrows.
Rome II engine.
🔥🔥
"Parthian archers are dealt a heavy blow"
Proceeds to show cavalry flank infantry istead of archers being shot by pillas
In conclusion: the Romans after the battle would soon have a series of weak emperors and poor economic and social management, paving the way for the crisis of the third century, however the Parthians, fratricidal dynastic disputes and invasions of nomads from the east, would end to make room for Ardashir I to defeat Artabanus in Hormozdgan in 224 and Vologasses V in 226 and so the Sassanids entered the game and would become one of the most important players in the crisis of the third century.
Poderia fazer uma batalha entre os elfos da floresta das trevas vs os anões das colinas de ferro
Feel like playing mount and blade banner lord now
No, the Parthians were not “Iranians” in the modern sense of belonging to the current nation state of Iran, but they were an Iranian people in the ethnic and linguistic sense
It would also have included Bactria, in particular Afghanistan
What mod was used for this battle?
the 'spikes' left by the 'retreating' Romans are 'caltrops', about the size of a baseball. Hard to see, the horses step on them, laming them instantly and decimating the cavalry.
Is this channel by the same voice actor from rome 2???
no lol, the voices are very similar though
Viva os Persas..viva o Irã.
Now do the Lydian-Persian war
There was no Iranian empire in 217 AD pretty sad when people put history blogs up without the proper knowledge.
Perhaps he's talking about the Persian empire.
Perhaps
@@pickleonions4277 The Parthians were Iranian people like the Persians
Not all Iranians were/are Persian
These two are literally cousins
There were always different branches
🇮🇷👑
They were Eastern Iranian parni tribe invaded parthai and make parthai empire , they were from Afghanistan
@@SolomonZeef They weren't from Afghanistan, they came from the great steppes
@@ramtin5152 it's not my point, every Iranian are Came from their, my point is their Homeland was Afghanistan.
@@SolomonZeef It wasn't
Look at their satrapy during the Achaemenid empire
And look at their kingdom during the Seleucid empire
Parni came from north of central Asia
@@ramtin5152 they were Eastern Iranian people, Afghans are literally Eastern Iranian peoples, and according to cambridge sources they were Afghans, there is a movie (the breadwinner) about Taliban, and one talib says we were parthain before.
This was a true dance of military manouvers and tactics between cavalry and infantry. Tactically it would be a really good draw for both sides only if Macrinus wasn't in a hurry for an Imperial throne
Horse archers, the original attack helicopter 🚁
What configuration hawe in comp?
امپراطوری اشکانیان ایران بزرگ
Golden Time
Can you about video war British Empire vs Japanese emperor
You have got me intrigued, I have never heard of such a war. Please clarify.
Game name?
Wich mod did you use for reskin romans
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Hit and Run - Mongol Tactics ? 🧐
Mods?
Am I the first person to think that this narrator sounds a little bit like Matt Berry (IT Crowd)? 😂
Yes.
The Roman infantry appear to be using the spartha, not the gladius.
Spatha not "Spartha",nothing to do with the Spartans and "gladius" merely means "sword" in translation not "short hispanic sword".
@paprskomet The spartha is the longer, Roman cavalry sword. The infantry used a shorter "gladius" in a stabbing motion. You can see that the Roman infantry are using a longer sword, predominantly in a slashing motion.
@@brianjones5379 Spatha not "Spartha".Why you continue to wite it incorrectly.It is Spatha not "Spartha"(no connection to Spartans).
As you was already told "gladius" onle means "sword" in translation. For the Romans it was never typollogical word reserved just to short hispanic swords.They obviously called as "gladius" any sword regardless type,shape or lenght. Even spathae were commonly refered simply with word "Gladius". Hispanic sword was in reality used both for stabbing and slashing and was effective in both(and clearly designed for both). It is popular misconception that it was for stabbing only.
Spatha was also used very much like hispanic swords regarless longer blade. In fact some hispanic swords had blade long basically the same as some of spathae models.
Un video sobre la guerra ruso-bizantina
Hi
Lured into the desert with little mobility and no logic of local conditions ? Hubris on top of it ? 🤨
Roman Empire - Persian battles were always in modern türkiye's syrian border and they were beaten by persians :) Battles of Edessa, Carrae et Nisibis
Battle of Ctesiphon 1-4, battle of Satala, battle of phasis.
The Roman-Persian Wars took place along the entire border
8:59 they can't see the big ass sticks
Sandy desert!!!
@@Memes-du3fp it is
The music conflicts 👎
what game is this?
🤦
Total War Rome II.
@@MarschallHstory but the game dosent look like that dose he use mods or what?
@@fah6345 Er verwendet glaube ich die Restitutor Orbis Mod. Die, die Römischen Einheiten im Dividet Empire DLC Reskindt.
@@MarschallHstory only one mode right? and also thanks brother
Glory Of Persian Empire
@@persianwarrior2048 *Parthian
This is only fun, whem Romans wins. :P
The Parthian empire was dying politically, but still had a strong military. The Romans should have sided with the rebel faction in Parthia. At the time there were 2 factions, not including the future founder of the Sassanid empire Ardashir I.
Thank feck
Why doesn't the Roman infantry have Roman Shields?
Roman infantry DO HAVE Roman shields.If your hollywood imagination about the Romans is limited just on rectangular model of shields no wonder that you incorrectly imagine Romans using only that type of shield.
@paprskomet there were a lot of different Roman shield types but I can't find any round ones for the standard infantry
@@mikelmeadows6254 Shields you see here became dominantly used model in the Roman army between 150-200 AD and remained the most commonly used type for many centuries afterwards.
@@mikelmeadows6254 Das sind Tatsächlich noch Ovale Parma die Abgerundet wurden. In Dura Europos haben Archäologen Noch ein sehr gut erhaltendes Modell dieses Schildtypus gefunden. Dazu wollte ich auf meinen Kanal noch ein Video machen.
The roman will win
🌿🦅🌿👍
Looks like Macrinus had the Parthians on the ropes, he severely damaged the Parthians prime Main body of veteran soldiers,the Heavy Cataphracts,which I think they used what was called Caltrops,used all the way until the beginning of Pike and Shot tactics in the late 16th century to the beginning of the 17th century, hand sized 3 sided pointed spike which ever way you threw it a spike pointed up, horses stepped on it threw the rider off, their Morale was probably broken when the Roman best veteran Units attacked them,the Heavy Infantry.The Parthians had nothing still in fighting shape except the light Cavalry Archers and some of their Camel Riders,not much of an Army,plus the Roman Cavalry was still in top fighting form and suffered little casualties.If it was me I would of finished destroying the Parthian Army,the Romans had the edge, their Veteran Heavy Infantry in better fighting shape and better Morale even though they had Heavy Casualties, Roman Heavy Infantry can take it if they see their enemy getting their ass wiped, plus a better more experienced Commander than the Parthians.
@@Richard-s2n7c If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses
The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle
Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
His Heavies """WERE NOT LOCALS or MERCENARIES""" that was his First Rate Troops,they got massacred, you unseat a Heavy Cavalry Trooper like that, to fight on the ground, they are more useless than a bowman. So the Persians lose their best Troops, the Romans , taking heavy casualties due to long range missile firing for their light Cavalry. The Roman Heavy Infantry and Heavy Cavalry , their Best Troops were still largely Intact, """I""" would ofused the true and tested old school Roman Turtle, retreated my Infantry to a better less open more narrower defence and had my Cavalry cut around the Persians sight unseen, would of used more Caltrops to prevent the enemy light Cavalry getting closer for better Missile Range and if you know anything about """LOGISTICS""" Bowed Horsemen in any period carried only so much arrows . What your doing son is basing your reply on this story, animation, could not have been that bad since the farther back you go less things are written down less detail. all I,m going is the """COMMANDERS""' the Romans had the more experienced one, the other just a plain King, second the Romans Destroyed the Persians first rate Troops,the Romans still had theirs in good fighting order. Don,t forget you can break a Unit or Army but they can break and fall back in good order and reform themselves to """STEADY""". Anyway , I always have had a """EXTREMELY LOW OPINION""" of that area ,its people and its history and specially its """MILITARY""",specially when that part of the country became muslim, Those people carry a Large """"YELLOW STREAK ON THEIR BACKS""".I give much more Respect to """ZULUS""" fighting tactics and ability than I do them.Greetings from a """ROMANIAN"""
@@Richard-s2n7c Holy YAP
Nice imagination though
Copy paste : At this point, Macrinus, with his army on the verge of breaking, sent another embassy to Artabanus, informing him of Caracalla's demise and offering a substantial compensation. The Parthian army had also suffered large casualties, and moreover, since it was not a professional but a feudal militia force, it had started to become restive at the prolonged campaign
Copy paste : Thus Artabanus agreed to a peace, after receiving 200 million sesterces
The battle ended inconclusively??!!! But romans paid 200 mil Sesterces to Iranian? 🤣🤣
What have the Romans ever done for us 🤣🤣
Parthian empire 🇦🇫
Parthians from Iran and iranic. Dont rob
@@mhrnothing4580
🇺🇦🤜🏻🇮🇷💩🕋🤛🏻🇮🇱
Their homeland wasn't in Afghanistan, it was in north east of Iran
@@ramtin5152 They were Pashtuns decent from Scythian they moved from Europe their descendants are afghans Eastern iranic
@@mhrnothing4580 parthians are eastern iranic 🇦🇬🇦🇫🇹🇯
Macrinus wasnt white he was born Caesarea Mauretaniae modern day Algeria (before Arab invasion) Its a known historical fact please get this correct when portraying these people.
Was you’re source gladiator 2?
people in North Africa were white before Arab migration. See: Carthage.
Roman will fail
👏
Nothing new, we can see this kind of behavior and intentions in our days.
Actually it was Sassanids
No
Please hindi dubing please
They werent "IRANIANS"....DUH!.
The Parthian empire was iranian.
【映像は素晴らしい】、ですが「表現・言語は意味不明？」。
If you read about the battle you'll see that Artabanus IV was almost breaking the Roman army despite the casualties his army took, an army formed mostly by locals and mercenaries rather than usually professional fighters from the seven great houses
The Romans attacked their borders first, the Romans were losing to this army, the Romans sent envoy for peace and the Romans were the ones who paid the Parthian empire such a heavy tribute, I don't see a draw in this battle
Plus the Roman invasion was stopped because of this very battle
Agree with you, interesting how the creator chose to describe the battle and portray the battle as arguably in favor or Rome. Then at the end somehow the story changes to…the Romans suing for peace? Lol
this video is full of your stupid comments that continue to ignore the bigger picture and you want to be right at all costs. you keep saying "an army made up of locals and mercenaries" as if that were an excuse and as if they were less capable than the romans, stop ideologizing historical facts to accommodate your political opinions. the romans and the parthians fought each other for centuries and were perhaps among the greatest enemies of the ancient world, if you love history you don't change it to your liking. the roman conquest stopped for dozens of other reasons not just for this battle, and let's stop creating "good and bad" with historical empires, they were fucking empires, and you should have a minimum of dignity. I would also like to know where you got your information, because depending on the authors and the historical findings you read, the "truth" changes completely, also macrinus paid a tribute because the political situation in rome was desperate and he had to make sure to end that war front. The Parthians had great victories against Rome, this one cannot be considered as such, Rome also had its victories against the Parthians, such as in 53 BC in Mount Gindaro.
You can't send an envoy for peace during a battle. The Romans and Parthians must have reached a stalemate, and at the end of the battle Macrinus must have assessed that the losses were too high: Artabanus' army was probably larger than the Roman one and the determination of the Parthians must have discouraged Macrinus. Macrinus therefore sued for peace.
En gros les romains on perdu contre les perses, quel honte
A pártus az nem iráni, de ezt egy nyugati nem tudja felfogni
Will you ever show a roman victory or do you just hate them?
😂😂
😂😂😂
The shadow of Rome is vast.
this battle was a draw...
This battle was a draw, were you paying attention?
Persia will win
Remarkably stupid battle between two nations, the parthians (led by a scythian dynadty) and romans, who should have got along.
iran is powerful❤
It was zorostrian then😂😂
Wrong it didn't exist then. Try Persia was powerful . That might work.
It's people are more powerful!
ساسانیان یه مشت وحشی حرومزاده بودن
Since mullah reign.. not exactly
Your mom.
So thousands of people die in this worthless battle?
why are you even here?
Its a part of history so not useless. thats just your serious lack of understanding. Go back to watching Sponge Bob.
@TheLibraryChamber I know it's part of history but what is the outcome of the battle, what the both sides have earned after this battle, plus I don't even watch SpongeBob
@TotalWarHistory. Learning who to make a cake
The Parthians stopped the Roman invasion, won the battle, saved their realm and the Romans paid them a tribute equal to the total wealth of the richest man during the period of the Roman republic, Crassus
I wouldn't say it was for nothing
Note the careful language when explaining a Parthian defeat. Thats the English in you. Absolutely TERRIFIED someone will think your racist . Parthians will soon be victorious in all these wars
Rome win and yet we are Christian 😎
More ads than content - I'm out!
👍🏻
A Pártus NEM perzsa,nem iráni, hanem SZKÍTA.
😂😂😂
I do not watch ANY advertisements. An ad comes on the video … I leave.
Cool 👌