@@BoxCox I actually want to learn Russian but it seems to be a huge pain learning it myself and language courses here are just english/spanish(non-burger here btw)
@@Calajese yea, learning a new language is always a huge pain. Never liked doing it. But, you know, quite a lot to gain. Access to a russian web, swearing of course. Mother Russia itself. And literature if you are a nerd.
Google is so fast and accurate that it even has time to sort and filter data so that they can give you propaganda instead of what you want while tracking you at the same time. Very impressive.
Why because a search needs some information about the user to do a task. Restaurants? Google knows what restaurants you like and where you are so it can recommend you to things in your local area. You just can't do something like that without some user profile lol.
All the people hating on google because it filters results and tracks you simply forget that, that is basically what you WANT a search engine to do. Filter results and give you the most relevant thing to you as fast as possible. You need know the person to do that. No way around this.
The reverse image search in yandex is just freaky. It was apparently made to target things like faces and can let you find information on people who's pictures you have
@@linux_fox yes. It found nothing on me. Well, I'm not into divulging my information on the net, so there's that, though I was hoping it could find my face on group photos from friends/acquaintances/random strangers I was caught in the photos of while passing by etc.
Other than the information they have on you, yes for no other reason. Also the video uploader should know that yandex.com is better for native English speakers than yandex.ru, for the .com version is in English. KGB Putin knows the text in the images you reverse image search at Yandex.
TH-cam algorithm isn't accessible by TH-cam engineers and TH-cam developers because its all made by AI and code which is machine language written is too complicated to be understood by any human
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 I still find the relevance of ads a bit creepy like I've even turned off my Advertising ID yet I still get personalised ads
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 Clearly they do have some say on how things run, because they can push for certain things to be prioritized, and not so much for others. Such as media outlets that compete with the main stream, etc.
@@Misteribel "google-style censorship" is not the same as personal info gathering. Do your own research and you will see that they are censoring what they deem as disinformation.
@@therandomofrandom9152 first try it decided to not work. Second and Third didn't install anything or do anything because my wifi card was crap. Fourth was fine
@@Sh4rlabyzer Well, Opera isn't any safe either. It couldn't be closer to being called "Chinese Malware", if you are using it, you are sending your data to the CCP.
I hate Google for 1 reason: it mindlessly recommends journalism over all other content. The internet has this great benefit over other forms of media that anyone can post information easily for anyone to see, it allows experts to create a website and share information to you. Instead Google prefers to give this role to clueless journalists who have no knowledge on the subject, who talk to under qualified “experts”, and who give a barebones and often incorrect summary on what you want. I want content made with passion, not content spat out for a commission
Details like these drastically degrade credibility/reliability of these kind of videos. I get that "average user" might not know about stuff like this, but if you're doing a comparison video, you put yourself in "better than average user" position and you better know what you're talking about.
@@dejfcold Google hides this shit behind an obscure and ambiguous drop down and Bing doesn't, I think the video perfectly conveys the differences. Microsoft clearly pays their UI design people much better than Google does, why in every redesign does youtubes interface get worse? Why is googles homepage 90% empty space and all the google platform tools are shoved into a drop down with an accompanying scroll bar that occupy maybe 1/8th of a screen. Google sucks at UI design and are far behind competitors in making user friendly applications, if it weren't for the fact that they were there earlier than their more modern competitors they would have no way to compete.
@@Mr.ToadJanfu it's not that we're saying Google has good UI design, it's that the guy doesn't even mention a simplified version of the advanced search page even exists. Right now, the guy is put in a position of power and trust, and is completely biased against Google, giving absolutely no credit where it is due. Of course, that doesn't mean he's wrong about the tracking, but that's not the point of the original comment
I liked using Bing for the reasons you mentioned and also because it's image search is infinitely superior specially with that one tool that allows you to scan a crop of the image and it finds more of that person, clothe, etc. It's incredible useful for an artist like me. But recently it's borderline unusable not only Bing but most Microsoft apps because no matter how many settings you go trough to set your language preferences to English, if you life in Mexico like me good luck your results will be a mix of taco and McDonald's. It makes it very annoying to do simple and complex searches because 90% of the time you won't get the results you want, if you wanna look up news just forget about it. I now use duck duck go which in my experience gives me the same results Bing gave me, I just use Bing when I need to look up image references.
Do you not speak Spanish? I'm not saying such a thing is impossible, I just didn't know there was groups of english speakers in mexico that was as visable as spanish speakers in America.
@@fastestdino2 in Latino, natively speak Spanish, yet all my apps are in English; it just became my preferred language for tech as soon as it became my second, originally it was also under the drive of improving at it, but then i just became used to it since i mostly interact with English speaking communities online even though i still speak Spanish daily. a lot of people are like me with english as their 2nd language, likely op as well
Well, from my experience with Yandex, as native russian speaker - it's... weird. In one hand - it's not that far from Google in terms of policing and censoring "wrong" political opinions in post-soviet countries, as well as it has some annoying tracking. In other - it has quite good features (like automated translations of videos by neural networks within minutes) and it's neutral to most things that are aside of politics... which also includes "privateering"
Then thr Buzzfeed news about Google's manipulation of search suggestions broke, I tested it for myself. "Hillary Clinton ind" auto-completed to Hillary Clinton India, and not Hillary Clinton Indictment, which is what I got from Bing. Switched to DuckDuckGo that day and never looked back.
@@stueyphone That's part of the Qanon conspiracy theory that's getting more popular with the far right. One of their beliefs is that Hillary Clinton murders and eats babies.
I'm incredibly disheartened by Google/Alphabet. I've been working in web stuff for going on 30 years and up until around 2012 or so I was a huge believer in Google. However, over the past decade things have vastly gotten out of control and their actions are beyond acceptable. As an example, the year they started charging for their maps API was a huge eye opener. Our company went from paying nothing to almost 20 grand a month. To make matters worse we spent the better part of a decade integrating their mapping software into our work. Sure, I get they need to get paid and all, but... it was just absurdity. Thankfully Google is actually very stupid in their ability to foresee their own actions, so we were still able to hack a free mapping account of them, but still... just pathetic.
If it were a private user forced to pay, I'd be outraged, but a company being billed is perfectly reasonable. The whole "it used to be free" thing sounds like whining.
@@diablo.the.cheater in a capitalist society, we need as much competition as we can get or the entire economy is undermined. It's especially important in the web since it's so widely used. Have a look at Amazon's ethics if you think monopolies on the internet are a good thing.
@@NicheAsQuiche In order to prevent monopolies we'd need to actually pass legislature that prevents companies from gaining too much market share, given that both major political parties in america are hard for "laissez faire" this is extremely unlikely to happen
@@original5243 both methods work. Free market method is more resource efficient and loophole proof, but it's not gonna happen because people too lazy to make the informed decision and act on it. That doesn't invalidate my original statement though
@@original5243 We already have good antitrust laws, new laws won't fix anything. The reason being the government doesn't even enforce the laws, including the one mentioned. So if the government is in bed with the massive monopolies, how would passing new laws help? People just need to use their brains and make better decisions. We need to instill critical thinking, logic and reason, and finally responsibility into the minds of our people.
I have personally set up my own searx instance. Works very well for me, but can be a bit slow at times (this is hardware limitation though and nothing to do with the product itself.) Easily maintainable, customization and open-source, what's not to love? :-)
@@oreos3174 lol, yeah I thought of that. This post was made a while back, and I thought of this potensial security flaw. It's been running on a VPS for quite a while now 💀
in my personal expitiense google dropped from the best searche engine to the worst. Search results only partually relevant, reverse image search is hella awful, regualr image search is awfull aswell, news tab is missleading and havely censored. Yandex is as spooky as google but their reverse search engine is 100% top notch, works as a charm.
- Ow nice tech chanel - Say that Google censor political topics, such as biodiversity "Hmm, strange thing to say but ok" - Gives Daily Stormer as a example of google censorship "oh no"
I mean in terms of censorship I think censoring the group promoting a genocide of a people is a good thing. Censor them to hell, make that shit as hard to access as possible.
With google images, you can click "tools" right next to "settings" and get a similar set of options for filtering images. bing is still more robust, however.
It's actually better to use public searx rather than host your own (assuming you would be the only user of your own instance) since the search engines can't build a profile around searches of multiple people. If you are the only user of the searx instance, using searx isn't much different than just googling normally (except you give your data to multiple search engines at once instead of one). At least this is how I understood this from when I looked into searx some time ago.
yea, that's exactly what I was thinking. Maybe could even be used to fingerprint you more accurately. I don't know how it actually works so I could be completely wrong
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis yeah but if the ip of the server is same for all your queries it's the same as if they came straight from your computer. Google etc. can build their fingerprints for your server which represents you since the queries only come from you.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis You don't get my point, it doesn't matter where the instance is as long as you are the only user all the queries that go trough are yours and yours only meaning google can build profile just based on all the queries that go trough. If you however use public instance google can't connect all the traffic to you and you only since it comes from multiple people. It doesn't matter whether the queries come from your home ip or server ip google can build the profile just as well. Whether it can connect the profile to you or not that's different case.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis So? what does it matter whether they come from server or your local ip? The queries come from one ip and can be connected to build profile. You don't seem to understand what I am trying to say here or you simply refuse to belive that google can connect profile made with different ip to you.
Yeah how about showing us an example that isn't literal nazi shit You know, the one kind of speech that advocates for getting rid of free speech? And therefore the one kind of speech that it's ok to censor?
@@vijaysridhar351 Is based on bing results, but with less tracking and a good cause! / Not full privacy oriented, but definitely better than google, yandex, and even bing itself! :)
You should mention that if you're looking to get your hands on some games through morally gray means that Yandex is much better. They are much more likely to show you rutracker or some other actually useful website than the other search engines you showed.
"Unless you're searching degenerate shit" Oh C'MON! We practically built the internet. Now everyone is treating us like garbage. You should be thanking us.
Bing is the most direct large search result, Google is the most "guided" search and they push what they think you are looking for by context rather the direct search quotes
I prefer bing because of its similar calculator/conversion calculator to google, and also has a built-in molecule visualiser when you look up any chemical formula. Also the rewards program is a massive plus.
When I search for chemical formulas in bing I just get similar results to the google ones, in slightly more ugly. No visualizer there also it shows me trending search results that do not interest me, Google shows me my last search results instead. Also google has the same conversion things as bing, but also adds integrated stuff like a guitar tuner, a metronome, random generators, colour pickers, etc. Google also doesn't load an image in the background and weird news that don't interest you, it's way cleaner in terms of looks, and also has a dark mode.
@@kipchickensout Yeah, the molecule visualiser seems to have disappeared since I made my comment. Google's calculator is also much better, offering a calculation history and more trig functions. I almost never load the actual frontpage of bing as I have it set as my default search engine in my browser, and I had never noticed the "trending search results" before, and now that I notice them, they're fairly obtrusive. News and background image can be disabled in the hamburger menu, but it doesn't seem to remember my preferences, even when I'm signed into my Microsoft account. Not having a native dark mode doesn't really affect me, I already use dark reader on almost every page.
I've been using duckduckgo for a year now and I haven't found any issues. I don't think the results are that bad, and usings ! for searching inside websites is so useful I can't live without it now. That also solves the issue of bad results, you can just type !g for google !w for wikipedia, !b for bing and probability the one I use the most !git for github
@Insert_text_here Yeah this is a really bad take. Giving an opinion a platform means you endorse that opinion and are fine with that opinion proliferating. Bad opinions, like advocating for genocide, should not be given a platform and should absolutely be censored and silenced. You would agree, unless you think genocide is okay.
@Insert_text_here no the website he used to prove that google "censors" literally advocates for a second jewish genocide. I don;'t know how you can be anywhere near the left and think its okay for something like that to be platformed. It's literally a neo nazi news site.
@@theapexbraves5116 What an absolutely moronic take. Just because you're giving an opinion a platform does not mean you agree with said opinion. Jesus.
What about Qwant? They are not anti censorship but still a candidate for modularization for me. I use it once every few weeks on my "Google only" browser. Response time is sometimes shitty, but result quality is good enough for me.
I use Ecosia because the plant trees every 45 searches (or at least around that) and that might seem like a lot but you have to consider how many searches there are, and also, it’s somewhat private and you can actually turn on full privacy somewhere in the settings, where that is, I am not sure
It's pure green-washing. The servers generate way more co2 that the surviving trees will absorb. I highly recommand that you look at the way the money is used... Most of it go to shady one man start-up with very low capital. A part of the money just disappear and most of the trees that got planted die very quickly. It's purely a commercial argument, you will not save the planet while researching porn. It's not a good reason to be tracked.
@@rollinontheboard well, the B corp certification and the reported 165 million+ trees planted (admittedly, they are the ones reporting the amount planted, but B lab IS respectable nonprofit) to mean SOMETHING, right? also, this took a long time to reply because i had no knowledge you replied
As much as I disagree with the message, it bothers me that publications, even those as disgusting sounding as the daily stormer, are covered up. Free speech doesn't just apply to the things you want to hear. It applies to everyone. It's uncomfortable at times, but the fact is, the moment you censor one thing, even if it's something as heinous as people believing they are better for their race, you yourself become free to also have your thoughts censored. It's been proven time and time again. Plus, when you do shit like scrub links from search engines, the people being censored are isolated, and seek comfort in each other. It increases instances of extremism and violence. Should note I'm referring to freedom of speech as a idea, not the constitutional right in the US and other countries. Google is a private entity, thus their actions don't violate the constitution. This is an important point that some mouth breathers can't seem to wrap their head around. However, due to it's prominence in society, Google has a moral obligation to ensure that all voices are freely available. If nothing else, if someone googles a neo nazi site by name, and that query is unique (like "The Daily Stormer") then it should return the website. This is an obligation Google fails to live up to. I don't like the site. The name alone makes my skin crawl. It's not a name that makes me think non-violent beliefs either, but I do believe that, by scrubbing search results, you give them a leg to stand on. It's a sort of martyrdom. The world is casting them aside. White supremacists are people too. You want to make the world better? Be nice to them. Show them that there's no reason to think that way. I'm not saying you have to like their beliefs, but if you treat them as evil people, they will become evil people. Just think for a moment. Imagine if someone you didn't know started calling you a monster? You would probably think they were crazy right? What if everyone started calling you a monster? You'd probably start to think the world is out to get you. Now you have an idea of how these people think. Thus, they find comfort in other white supremacists and their beliefs become an echo chamber. See why this is bad?
It's not because anybody cares of course, as you've stated it accomplishes nothing. Advertisers like it. It paints a better public image. Out of sight, out of mind?
see this is why i hate overly-scared-about-security, tryna pursuade people to use friggin duckduckgo lmao "polically biased" "worse by the day" LMAO ARE YOU IN UR RIGHT MIND
Thank you for illustrating the point. It's all fun and games when Google sensors people you don't like, it stops being funny as soon as they sensor you. Either you believe in free speech for everyone or not at all. You're also forgetting the echo chamber effect. Targeted adds and search results cause you current ideas to be reflected back to you reinforcing your existing beliefs, so instead of being exposed to different points of view and gaining understanding you get increasingly polarized and entrenched, after all every time you look into the matter it looks like everyone agrees with you and people who don't are just crazy.
@@christianbaker3229 You'd rather have people become Nazis than whatever the alternative is? I believe in free speech as long as it doesn't infringe on anybodies rights. This is literally the law here in Germany. In this case google is literally trying to stop people from falling in to right wing Nazi echo chambers. These people believe that every media outlet is lying and that you can't trust anybody but them. If that's not an echo chamber then what is? It seems hard to believe, but doing the "morally right" thing here and just letting Nazis enjoy complete free speech will just lead to more pain. They spread their agenda like a cancer and make more and more followers. I've spiraled down the alt right rabbit hole before myself and I'm glad I never found stuff like the daily stormer, because I knew I would've just blindly believed it.
@@Poly_0000 I agree that the Nazi stuff is a difficult thing to justify defending, and I'm really not interested in trying to defend that. The main point stands though, it's only seen as good/ok as long as you disagree with what is being censored pick another topic one that is less obvious something that you are on the fence about. is it right if Google decides that you only need to see one side of that debate (the side they agree with). The fact is that Google is the gateway to information and learning for most people in the US, and I suspect many other countries, as such they have a moral obligation to be neutral, there are some things we can all agree should be censored like Nazi rhetoric, CP etc. but the problem is that it is becoming increasingly obvious that they also meddle with other things that really should be an open debate. They feel they have the right to place their hand on the scale of research, study, and debate, and tip that scale how it suits them. That is a dangerous precedent to set. And in fact becomes just like a Nazi mindset, silence those you do not agree with, and those who criticize you, don't debate them, don't argue with them, don't ignore them, silence them. Only in modern terms instead of burning books you simply unlist them or push them back to places people never go like the 4th or 5th results page. Fine if they end up forgotten and unseen because they are crazy, offensive, obscene, but no one deserves to be silenced. The few exceptions to this rule are almost universally agreed upon, and further entries to that list should not be taken lightly.
@@nuclearbiologist I mean that matches up with the implications of insisting on the reality of something like "human biodiversity" which isn't actually supported by any real research and is completely ignorant of the fact that environment is the main factor in any person's development and, given a few generations, completely eliminates any noticeable biological differences between people groups. All that being said, I'm not sure why any even marginally intellectual or rational person would want to visit the Daily Stormer website but I can say based on my own experiments that not only can I find it indexed by Google, it's literally the second result after the wiki page and before the SPLC's writeup and there is little if any difference between Google and DuckDuckGo searches.
@@nuclearbiologist I definitely got like a Libertarian/alt-right type of vibe from some of his other videos but it's sad to see it so extremely and blatantly confirmed.
If only people realised how politically biased Google was. I would not doubt that they are a significant contributor to today's political polarisation.
@@pessipaivarinne3174 Yeah it is. What can the Russian government do to you if you’re not in Russia? They won’t waste cyanide on you cause you downloaded a cracked game and they can’t really arrest you
I'm using DuckDuckGo because of permission for choosing search region - this is very useful for learning languages and looking for results from specific countries.
been stopped using google since 2020 because of their extreme left-wing bias i was searching for a chad meme and the top results are talking about me being an inc*l for this like wtf? in other hand duckduck do the job for me
Google doesn't "make" anything political, it just leans towards a political agenda that isn't necessarily yours. Politics can be imbued in everything, as it is basically human relations. When you claim something is "apolitical", it almost always just conforms to your specific world view.
I'm not saying Google results are without problems though, it can definitely be a problem if you only get results that conform to the political opinions that you already hold.
Using search engines in 2022 has become absolutely useless. The results on the first page are only ads, ad pages, more ads and obsolete forum posts that are 20 years old.
Largely the main thing I use a search engine for is making sure I spell words correctly because I'm dyslexic and my spelling is shit. So I really don't care if Google knows I can't spell a word like "inconspicuous" ... they can do whatever they want with that information, all I care about is I don't look like a dumbass who can't spell.
Statistics shouldn’t be politicised, but they are. I don’t care what Mancy Joe has to say in their shitty under researched op-ed, I just want plain numbers from a reliable source
I run a small electronics company , I use Petal (Huawei's search engine) . because 1. there is nothing I know that Huawei doesn't know way better 2. I'm totally sure they won't go running to Washington with my data 3. it gets noticeably better over time 4. The text is easy on my older eyes.
A minor point about politicized results / the politicization of life; all of life involves power relations, we're at a moment in history with greater leeway to recognize and explore them. And re: the example that follows, FBI crime stats truly are the best way to make a completely decontextualized argument for the inherent evil of a particular race. Also lol @ human biodiversity.
"Cyrillic alphabet boys" I have never heard of a better way to reference the russian agencies than this
Ыыыы просто пользуйся вражескими сервисами, они же не отдают информацию твоим спецслужбам
Yandex has wicked search capabilities for images, handy tool for OSINT.
@@BoxCox I actually want to learn Russian but it seems to be a huge pain learning it myself and language courses here are just english/spanish(non-burger here btw)
@@stuvademakaroner9607 you're right Slav brother
@@Calajese yea, learning a new language is always a huge pain. Never liked doing it. But, you know, quite a lot to gain. Access to a russian web, swearing of course. Mother Russia itself. And literature if you are a nerd.
Oh dear, Yandex has been handing over my anime reverse image searches to Russian authorities...
they're providing you the sauce in real time.
@@MentalOutlaw mmmmmm M mmm, very nice
Yes, now I know your bloody weird fetishes
Kinda sketched out about yandex but their anime results are too good.
@@MentalOutlaw *MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM*
Actually google gives nice pirate results if you search in russian
oh my god yes literally everything is free if you are searching in russian.
Tell me how please
@@kevyyar just use a translator lol
i search in arabic, good shit
@@kevyyar write скачать instead download and file name
Google is so fast and accurate that it even has time to sort and filter data so that they can give you propaganda instead of what you want while tracking you at the same time. Very impressive.
Google is still the best search engine if you want to find 90% of things.
Why because a search needs some information about the user to do a task. Restaurants? Google knows what restaurants you like and where you are so it can recommend you to things in your local area. You just can't do something like that without some user profile lol.
All the people hating on google because it filters results and tracks you simply forget that, that is basically what you WANT a search engine to do. Filter results and give you the most relevant thing to you as fast as possible. You need know the person to do that. No way around this.
@@KManAbout Keep using Google, no one cares if you use it.
@@R1gBoN3Gaming lol. you missed the point
The reverse image search in yandex is just freaky. It was apparently made to target things like faces and can let you find information on people who's pictures you have
Spooky. I'm going it try it on me
@@iamtrash288 Did you?
@@linux_fox yes. It found nothing on me. Well, I'm not into divulging my information on the net, so there's that, though I was hoping it could find my face on group photos from friends/acquaintances/random strangers I was caught in the photos of while passing by etc.
whose**
Cool, now I can stalk my favorite porn stars!
How ironic that TH-cam recommended me this for no apparent reason
Other than the information they have on you, yes for no other reason. Also the video uploader should know that yandex.com is better for native English speakers than yandex.ru, for the .com version is in English. KGB Putin knows the text in the images you reverse image search at Yandex.
TH-cam algorithm isn't accessible by TH-cam engineers and TH-cam developers because its all made by AI and code which is machine language written is too complicated to be understood by any human
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 I still find the relevance of ads a bit creepy like I've even turned off my Advertising ID yet I still get personalised ads
@@thisaccountsucks5556 nice picture
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 Clearly they do have some say on how things run, because they can push for certain things to be prioritized, and not so much for others. Such as media outlets that compete with the main stream, etc.
0:00 Google
2:13 Bing
5:01 Yandex
6:11 DuckDuckGo
7:06 Searx
8:05 Swisscows
Thanks!
Swisscows
no startpage?
Ducks for the win!
No ecosia sadly
Never in my life i would have expected Bing to be actual somewhat useful.
google’s just overrated as shit
@@framednapkin tru
i might actually give it a try
I've been using bing for a year now, and to be honest, it's s really good search engine
I've no joke used bing for 2 years now and I've never regretted anything
Swisscows seems like a good search engine for no nut november.
It's better to have the browser pornproff with antiporn pluggins and stuff, but of course, it takes time, and the cooming waits no one :(
@@transforgoku lol
Or For Schools.
No CP November :(
@@cakeisyummy5755 DONT TELL THEM
Duckduckgo joined google-style censorship
Do you have a reputable reference for that? ‘Google style’ would imply storing user’s data, and not doing so is the bread and butter of Duck.
@@Misteribel "google-style censorship" is not the same as personal info gathering. Do your own research and you will see that they are censoring what they deem as disinformation.
@@izaakveenstra5027 I did, that's why I asked for a reference. Apparently you did your research, just copy it in, so that others can learn and verify.
"Don't be evil"
they took that out a couple of years ago, no joke
@@seres1, still have the archive
They changed it to "Do the right thing" awhile back.
You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain
@@BlueSatoshi "do the right thing" for who though?
"Use bing if you want easier access to daily stormer" doesn't sound like a good advertisement for it
It's a great one wym?
@ hello? Cringe Department?
@@duckmeat4674 do you fucking know what the daily stormer is?
@@Poly_0000 BuzzFeed for tradcaths
@@duckmeat4674 haha ok
Bing: porn
Duckduckgo: image
Google: dictionary
Yandex: sauce
I like ham
Candle for weird shit 🤣
Google really isn’t good for that even because of the way they tailor search results
Yandex better
DDG just committed seppuku by announcing they will downrank news from Russia.
DuckDuckGo is not safe anymore
please install gentoo while drunk
Gentoo gives me a bad enough hangover as it is
Manjaro was already challenging enough for me on the first four attempts
@@matthewferraro8020 Lol what bro 😂 you literally just have to boot from usb and basically hit install. How did it take you four tries?
@@therandomofrandom9152 first try it decided to not work. Second and Third didn't install anything or do anything because my wifi card was crap. Fourth was fine
@@matthewferraro8020 bro me too but my problem is that the rufus does not the detect the iso
Would love an updated one of this with Qwant, Brave search and a few other new engines, maybe with revised ratings for old ones too.
Hell yeah, where are my startpage boys at?
Brave is a false privacy browser. Stay away from it.
@@toasterzyx thanks for the info i didnt know that, ig imma install opera then and use duck duck go instead
@Xaarpus
He’s bullshitting.
@@Sh4rlabyzer Well, Opera isn't any safe either. It couldn't be closer to being called "Chinese Malware", if you are using it, you are sending your data to the CCP.
I hate Google for 1 reason: it mindlessly recommends journalism over all other content.
The internet has this great benefit over other forms of media that anyone can post information easily for anyone to see, it allows experts to create a website and share information to you. Instead Google prefers to give this role to clueless journalists who have no knowledge on the subject, who talk to under qualified “experts”, and who give a barebones and often incorrect summary on what you want. I want content made with passion, not content spat out for a commission
I want the ideas, not commentary on the ideas
@@KyriosHeptagrammaton sound good
good point
"journalism" if that's what it can even be called anymore
What engine do you recommend?
4:25 That filter thing is called "tools" and it's right next to the "settings" button. You don't have to go to the advanced search page.
really a rushed video imo
Details like these drastically degrade credibility/reliability of these kind of videos.
I get that "average user" might not know about stuff like this, but if you're doing a comparison video, you put yourself in "better than average user" position and you better know what you're talking about.
@@dejfcold Google hides this shit behind an obscure and ambiguous drop down and Bing doesn't, I think the video perfectly conveys the differences. Microsoft clearly pays their UI design people much better than Google does, why in every redesign does youtubes interface get worse? Why is googles homepage 90% empty space and all the google platform tools are shoved into a drop down with an accompanying scroll bar that occupy maybe 1/8th of a screen. Google sucks at UI design and are far behind competitors in making user friendly applications, if it weren't for the fact that they were there earlier than their more modern competitors they would have no way to compete.
@@mikedw6748 Its not a rushed video. Its a biased video about things being biased.
@@Mr.ToadJanfu it's not that we're saying Google has good UI design, it's that the guy doesn't even mention a simplified version of the advanced search page even exists. Right now, the guy is put in a position of power and trust, and is completely biased against Google, giving absolutely no credit where it is due. Of course, that doesn't mean he's wrong about the tracking, but that's not the point of the original comment
Duckduckgo got pozzed with the Russian war
I liked using Bing for the reasons you mentioned and also because it's image search is infinitely superior specially with that one tool that allows you to scan a crop of the image and it finds more of that person, clothe, etc. It's incredible useful for an artist like me.
But recently it's borderline unusable not only Bing but most Microsoft apps because no matter how many settings you go trough to set your language preferences to English, if you life in Mexico like me good luck your results will be a mix of taco and McDonald's. It makes it very annoying to do simple and complex searches because 90% of the time you won't get the results you want, if you wanna look up news just forget about it.
I now use duck duck go which in my experience gives me the same results Bing gave me, I just use Bing when I need to look up image references.
Do you not speak Spanish? I'm not saying such a thing is impossible, I just didn't know there was groups of english speakers in mexico that was as visable as spanish speakers in America.
@@fastestdino2 I'm indian, fluently speak and write hindi but I still prefer English wayyy over Hindi in my searches
@@fastestdino2 in Latino, natively speak Spanish, yet all my apps are in English; it just became my preferred language for tech as soon as it became my second, originally it was also under the drive of improving at it, but then i just became used to it since i mostly interact with English speaking communities online even though i still speak Spanish daily. a lot of people are like me with english as their 2nd language, likely op as well
It is a year old but you can hide your geo location I'm pretty sure or spoof it to USA I personally don't do it but Ik its possible
Bing is annoying af just for the massive amounts of unrelated ads it shows me
To bad duck duck go owner bragging about being prejudice last week...
Goodbye duck duck gone !
Well, from my experience with Yandex, as native russian speaker - it's... weird.
In one hand - it's not that far from Google in terms of policing and censoring "wrong" political opinions in post-soviet countries, as well as it has some annoying tracking.
In other - it has quite good features (like automated translations of videos by neural networks within minutes) and it's neutral to most things that are aside of politics... which also includes "privateering"
It is sensitive on politics? Never noticed lol. I guess I don't google political stuff too often
>duck is based
Video aged badly
what happened
I came here after duckduckgo stopped being baste and redpilled lol
What search engine would you recommend?
what happened
if you genuinely read the daily stormer you probably shouldnt be using the internet or have any sort of contact with human beings anyways
Interesting that this guy used the daily stormer and searches about biological variation in humans to demonstrate censorship…
Look up the different autoccomplete results for ''Hillary Clinton is'' in different engines.
Literally so no difference. I guess google didn’t give me recommended searches but that’s it.
Then thr Buzzfeed news about Google's manipulation of search suggestions broke, I tested it for myself. "Hillary Clinton ind" auto-completed to Hillary Clinton India, and not Hillary Clinton Indictment, which is what I got from Bing. Switched to DuckDuckGo that day and never looked back.
Autocomplete is filled by your cookies and history tho...
I got on Bing "Hillary Clinton isst kinder" which means Hillary Clinton eats kids. Wtf
@@stueyphone That's part of the Qanon conspiracy theory that's getting more popular with the far right. One of their beliefs is that Hillary Clinton murders and eats babies.
I'm incredibly disheartened by Google/Alphabet. I've been working in web stuff for going on 30 years and up until around 2012 or so I was a huge believer in Google. However, over the past decade things have vastly gotten out of control and their actions are beyond acceptable. As an example, the year they started charging for their maps API was a huge eye opener. Our company went from paying nothing to almost 20 grand a month. To make matters worse we spent the better part of a decade integrating their mapping software into our work. Sure, I get they need to get paid and all, but... it was just absurdity. Thankfully Google is actually very stupid in their ability to foresee their own actions, so we were still able to hack a free mapping account of them, but still... just pathetic.
here here! I agree totally! It's just my opinion but, people that don't care at all about their privacy, are very stupid to me.
@@yahchile7681 How can you say that whilst using TH-cam? Outrageous!
If it were a private user forced to pay, I'd be outraged, but a company being billed is perfectly reasonable. The whole "it used to be free" thing sounds like whining.
Ah yes the daily stormer where I get all my non biased-, factual and accurate information
Unironically
Where tf else are you going to get it? From former CIA ops on CNN and Fox?
I’d trust that over censored lies
Either way, I don't really want a search engine deciding that it doesn't want me to visit some sites.
I can imagine secret Russian service agents looking at a data from some random American kid
"quick, make the kid vote for the orange man, what do you mean the kid can't vote 5 times"
Ай эм Рашн Иван, ай чуз ху винс зэ илекшн энд хэк Пентагон вери изи ноу проблем
I wanna see more fragmentation of the web like this, just how it was healthy in the 1990s.
I don't i want to see the web less fragmented, fragmentation never led to good things, only bad practices like
@@diablo.the.cheater in a capitalist society, we need as much competition as we can get or the entire economy is undermined. It's especially important in the web since it's so widely used. Have a look at Amazon's ethics if you think monopolies on the internet are a good thing.
@@NicheAsQuiche In order to prevent monopolies we'd need to actually pass legislature that prevents companies from gaining too much market share, given that both major political parties in america are hard for "laissez faire" this is extremely unlikely to happen
@@original5243 both methods work. Free market method is more resource efficient and loophole proof, but it's not gonna happen because people too lazy to make the informed decision and act on it. That doesn't invalidate my original statement though
@@original5243 We already have good antitrust laws, new laws won't fix anything. The reason being the government doesn't even enforce the laws, including the one mentioned. So if the government is in bed with the massive monopolies, how would passing new laws help? People just need to use their brains and make better decisions. We need to instill critical thinking, logic and reason, and finally responsibility into the minds of our people.
This did not age well
I host my own Searx at home and access it with reverse ssh proxy. Catch that glowies
I like your funny words, magic man
@@Svvicu
Fr, no idea what they're saying 😂
>SearX has GPL license
>calls it "open source"
STALLMAN-ESQUE SCREECHING
Why isn't GPL open source?
JOIN US NOW AND SHARE THE SOFTWARE
L I B R E
@@johnwhite7700 it's not open source. it's FREE. FREE I TELL YOU
@@smhsophie Ahh, mandatory freedom, now i see. Btw this isn't a con if you're not a company
One good thing about Yandex is that it works better in Russian than google and gives better results
nope
@@flexagonpark5467 elaborate
@@umamifan I am Russian and I used both, they are the same, but Yandex sometimes advertises partner services without marking search results as an ad
@@flexagonpark5467 did Yandex get so bad or did google finally become useful, because before the difference was night and day
@@misham6547 google got much better, but actually I use DuckDuckGo, it's good in 95% of the cases
I have personally set up my own searx instance. Works very well for me, but can be a bit slow at times (this is hardware limitation though and nothing to do with the product itself.) Easily maintainable, customization and open-source, what's not to love? :-)
Sounds really cool
i cant take this comment seriously when you have a DDG profile picture haha
I'm curious how that works, since the searx searches are coming from your home network, couldn't they be connected to you?
@@oreos3174 lol, yeah I thought of that. This post was made a while back, and I thought of this potensial security flaw. It's been running on a VPS for quite a while now 💀
@@jonasskany6708 probably a good idea
IT GLOWS A DIFFERENT COLOR HOLY LLOL
"no results for porn"
Who can dislike this search engine? )))
Coomers
Non Christians or Muslims.
@@belstar1128 Do you really think there are that many religious people that don't coom to porn?
@@BjornsTIR nonchristians do think it be like that
@@BjornsTIR Regular church-goers don’t coom to p*rn.
"Unless you're looking for porn or other degenerate shit"
Nice political bias
How is porn political ?
@shane
Certain political groups hate porn
in my personal expitiense google dropped from the best searche engine to the worst. Search results only partually relevant, reverse image search is hella awful, regualr image search is awfull aswell, news tab is missleading and havely censored. Yandex is as spooky as google but their reverse search engine is 100% top notch, works as a charm.
Google reverse image search becomes Google Lens which is worst. Yandex is much better for this purpose.
- Ow nice tech chanel
- Say that Google censor political topics, such as biodiversity
"Hmm, strange thing to say but ok"
- Gives Daily Stormer as a example of google censorship
"oh no"
yeah same
I mean in terms of censorship I think censoring the group promoting a genocide of a people is a good thing. Censor them to hell, make that shit as hard to access as possible.
@@pyraffin yep
DuckDuckGo is now as bad as Google
True, they works with Microsoft
With google images, you can click "tools" right next to "settings" and get a similar set of options for filtering images. bing is still more robust, however.
Thx I was looking for this comment. surprised he didn't know this, cause he's good at using google's engine
yeah that was genuinely pretty embarrassing lol
It's actually better to use public searx rather than host your own (assuming you would be the only user of your own instance) since the search engines can't build a profile around searches of multiple people. If you are the only user of the searx instance, using searx isn't much different than just googling normally (except you give your data to multiple search engines at once instead of one).
At least this is how I understood this from when I looked into searx some time ago.
yea, that's exactly what I was thinking. Maybe could even be used to fingerprint you more accurately. I don't know how it actually works so I could be completely wrong
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis yeah but if the ip of the server is same for all your queries it's the same as if they came straight from your computer. Google etc. can build their fingerprints for your server which represents you since the queries only come from you.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis You don't get my point, it doesn't matter where the instance is as long as you are the only user all the queries that go trough are yours and yours only meaning google can build profile just based on all the queries that go trough. If you however use public instance google can't connect all the traffic to you and you only since it comes from multiple people. It doesn't matter whether the queries come from your home ip or server ip google can build the profile just as well. Whether it can connect the profile to you or not that's different case.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis So? what does it matter whether they come from server or your local ip? The queries come from one ip and can be connected to build profile. You don't seem to understand what I am trying to say here or you simply refuse to belive that google can connect profile made with different ip to you.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis 🤓
It’s a self limiting process, once all other small search engines become big, they’ll be forced to follow these rules too.
This makes me remember AltaVista, Ask Jeeves, Lycos, Webcrawler, ...
But that was back when Google was actually good. They got too comfortable and self-nerfed
Using the daily stormer as an example doesn’t help your image, bud
Yeah how about showing us an example that isn't literal nazi shit
You know, the one kind of speech that advocates for getting rid of free speech? And therefore the one kind of speech that it's ok to censor?
He was also talking about human biodiversity too, that's pretty sussy.
turns out duckduckgo glows as brightly as bing
You forgot Ecosia!
The search engine that plants trees.
Where does it stand on privacy??
@@vijaysridhar351 Is based on bing results, but with less tracking and a good cause! / Not full privacy oriented, but definitely better than google, yandex, and even bing itself! :)
@@SteveVedder122 why do you think so?
@@SteveVedder122 is that because of bad results ??
@@ルシアン-k1y servers generate an 'eap of co2 to feed the trees
1:54 i wonder what crime statistics he had in mind 🤔
You should mention that if you're looking to get your hands on some games through morally gray means that Yandex is much better. They are much more likely to show you rutracker or some other actually useful website than the other search engines you showed.
😂
If you're looking for free malware they're also more helpful
@@ararune3734 if you're older than 11 you shouldn't be afraid of this lol
@@sharoyveduchi If you have a brain on the other hand, you should be wary of software from unknown sources.
@@ararune3734 you must be the type of guy who thinks a Linux distro like Trisequel isn't trust worthy because it's not a brand name
From the thumbnail, it looks like having a letter as the logo means it’s bad
letters bad, animal and body part logos good
Alphabet logos are always a bad sign
@@kosherkingofisrael6381 And that's with anything
"Unless you're searching degenerate shit"
Oh C'MON! We practically built the internet. Now everyone is treating us like garbage. You should be thanking us.
... Scientists aren't coomers.
@@j.k.4479 I mean, ignoring that you are probably misusing the term "scientist".
Yes. Yes, they are.
Bing is the most direct large search result, Google is the most "guided" search and they push what they think you are looking for by context rather the direct search quotes
Which is why google is usually much better. There's also google assistant which far and away the best voice assistant
I prefer bing because of its similar calculator/conversion calculator to google, and also has a built-in molecule visualiser when you look up any chemical formula. Also the rewards program is a massive plus.
When I search for chemical formulas in bing I just get similar results to the google ones, in slightly more ugly. No visualizer there
also it shows me trending search results that do not interest me, Google shows me my last search results instead.
Also google has the same conversion things as bing, but also adds integrated stuff like a guitar tuner, a metronome, random generators, colour pickers, etc. Google also doesn't load an image in the background and weird news that don't interest you, it's way cleaner in terms of looks, and also has a dark mode.
@@kipchickensout Yeah, the molecule visualiser seems to have disappeared since I made my comment. Google's calculator is also much better, offering a calculation history and more trig functions.
I almost never load the actual frontpage of bing as I have it set as my default search engine in my browser, and I had never noticed the "trending search results" before, and now that I notice them, they're fairly obtrusive.
News and background image can be disabled in the hamburger menu, but it doesn't seem to remember my preferences, even when I'm signed into my Microsoft account.
Not having a native dark mode doesn't really affect me, I already use dark reader on almost every page.
@@lwinklly R. I. P. well use what you like to use, right
@@kipchickensout smh
@@pepi8433 ?
firearms, crime statistics, and human biodiversity are all inescapably political topics and pretending they're not is just stupid.
You’d think the keyword “statistics” would give Google a heads up that I want plain numbers with no bullshit from a reliable source, but it doesn’t.
Yandex's reverse search is way too useful XD
I didn't even know that Swisscows even existed until now. I'll have to try it out. Thanks, Kenny!
I've been using duckduckgo for a year now and I haven't found any issues. I don't think the results are that bad, and usings ! for searching inside websites is so useful I can't live without it now. That also solves the issue of bad results, you can just type !g for google !w for wikipedia, !b for bing and probability the one I use the most !git for github
Thank you for this, I never knew I could !g for the normie search!
I like how this guy talks about political censorship from alt-right platforms like it's a bad thing.
Censorship is pretty bad, yes.
@Insert_text_here I don't really know how to explain to you that you shouldn't give advocating for genocide a platform.
@Insert_text_here Yeah this is a really bad take. Giving an opinion a platform means you endorse that opinion and are fine with that opinion proliferating. Bad opinions, like advocating for genocide, should not be given a platform and should absolutely be censored and silenced. You would agree, unless you think genocide is okay.
@Insert_text_here no the website he used to prove that google "censors" literally advocates for a second jewish genocide. I don;'t know how you can be anywhere near the left and think its okay for something like that to be platformed. It's literally a neo nazi news site.
@@theapexbraves5116 What an absolutely moronic take. Just because you're giving an opinion a platform does not mean you agree with said opinion. Jesus.
RIP DDGO
4:20 with Google you can click on tools next to settings instead and it has those built in filters on the page just like Bing btw
I actually found Yandex by accident, but ended up really enjoying the experience
10/10 would recommend 👌
"Bing is probably the search engine of choice for pirates."
Thanks for the shout out. Looking forward to working with you again.
I’m so shocked that Daily Stormer actually shows up with Bing…and it’s the top result, wtf!???
Wow I’m really surprised hearing someone recommended bing over google
(besides Microsoft)
Bings good if you're an xbox gamer because you can get free gift cards from bing rewards. That's the only reason I've ever used it
What about Qwant?
They are not anti censorship but still a candidate for modularization for me. I use it once every few weeks on my "Google only" browser. Response time is sometimes shitty, but result quality is good enough for me.
I use Ecosia because the plant trees every 45 searches (or at least around that) and that might seem like a lot but you have to consider how many searches there are, and also, it’s somewhat private and you can actually turn on full privacy somewhere in the settings, where that is, I am not sure
It's pure green-washing. The servers generate way more co2 that the surviving trees will absorb.
I highly recommand that you look at the way the money is used... Most of it go to shady one man start-up with very low capital.
A part of the money just disappear and most of the trees that got planted die very quickly.
It's purely a commercial argument, you will not save the planet while researching porn.
It's not a good reason to be tracked.
Ecosia is basically Microsoft Bing except rebranded and marketed towards climate alarmists! Yay!
@@rollinontheboard well, the B corp certification and the reported 165 million+ trees planted (admittedly, they are the ones reporting the amount planted, but B lab IS respectable nonprofit) to mean SOMETHING, right?
also, this took a long time to reply because i had no knowledge you replied
@@DuoVersal I like trees
@@rollinontheboard …okay?
your example is the daily stormer bruh
tl:dr don't use Google if you are a conservative
My favorite tech youtuber uploads again.
I don't agree with everything you say in your videos, but I'm really grateful to have found you. You provide a lot of useful information. Thank you.
DDG Hasn't aged too well
searched 13/50 and got the FBI knocking on my door the next day...
Why are you using an Asian chick as your pfp?
Everything relevant or even related to society is inherently political.
Of course somebody with a profile pic like that would say that lol let me guess, you're American and under the age of 25 right?
@@energeticyellow1637 subbed to GradeAUnderA in 2022. Opinion determined irrelevant.
damn political google, always making neo-nazi message boards all political
Yeah dang diddly darn google hiding nazi search results!
As much as I disagree with the message, it bothers me that publications, even those as disgusting sounding as the daily stormer, are covered up. Free speech doesn't just apply to the things you want to hear. It applies to everyone. It's uncomfortable at times, but the fact is, the moment you censor one thing, even if it's something as heinous as people believing they are better for their race, you yourself become free to also have your thoughts censored. It's been proven time and time again. Plus, when you do shit like scrub links from search engines, the people being censored are isolated, and seek comfort in each other. It increases instances of extremism and violence.
Should note I'm referring to freedom of speech as a idea, not the constitutional right in the US and other countries. Google is a private entity, thus their actions don't violate the constitution. This is an important point that some mouth breathers can't seem to wrap their head around. However, due to it's prominence in society, Google has a moral obligation to ensure that all voices are freely available. If nothing else, if someone googles a neo nazi site by name, and that query is unique (like "The Daily Stormer") then it should return the website. This is an obligation Google fails to live up to. I don't like the site. The name alone makes my skin crawl. It's not a name that makes me think non-violent beliefs either, but I do believe that, by scrubbing search results, you give them a leg to stand on. It's a sort of martyrdom. The world is casting them aside. White supremacists are people too. You want to make the world better? Be nice to them. Show them that there's no reason to think that way. I'm not saying you have to like their beliefs, but if you treat them as evil people, they will become evil people. Just think for a moment. Imagine if someone you didn't know started calling you a monster? You would probably think they were crazy right? What if everyone started calling you a monster? You'd probably start to think the world is out to get you. Now you have an idea of how these people think. Thus, they find comfort in other white supremacists and their beliefs become an echo chamber. See why this is bad?
It's not because anybody cares of course, as you've stated it accomplishes nothing. Advertisers like it. It paints a better public image. Out of sight, out of mind?
Can you upload your content on other platforms. Odysee, Rumble, Bitchute, etc.
see this is why i hate overly-scared-about-security, tryna pursuade people to use friggin duckduckgo lmao "polically biased" "worse by the day" LMAO ARE YOU IN UR RIGHT MIND
Yeah I love he has to reach so hard to find a good example. The daily stormer is being censored? Good! That site is litteraly a nazi news journal.
Thank you for illustrating the point. It's all fun and games when Google sensors people you don't like, it stops being funny as soon as they sensor you. Either you believe in free speech for everyone or not at all. You're also forgetting the echo chamber effect. Targeted adds and search results cause you current ideas to be reflected back to you reinforcing your existing beliefs, so instead of being exposed to different points of view and gaining understanding you get increasingly polarized and entrenched, after all every time you look into the matter it looks like everyone agrees with you and people who don't are just crazy.
@@christianbaker3229 You'd rather have people become Nazis than whatever the alternative is? I believe in free speech as long as it doesn't infringe on anybodies rights. This is literally the law here in Germany. In this case google is literally trying to stop people from falling in to right wing Nazi echo chambers. These people believe that every media outlet is lying and that you can't trust anybody but them. If that's not an echo chamber then what is? It seems hard to believe, but doing the "morally right" thing here and just letting Nazis enjoy complete free speech will just lead to more pain. They spread their agenda like a cancer and make more and more followers. I've spiraled down the alt right rabbit hole before myself and I'm glad I never found stuff like the daily stormer, because I knew I would've just blindly believed it.
@@Poly_0000 I agree that the Nazi stuff is a difficult thing to justify defending, and I'm really not interested in trying to defend that. The main point stands though, it's only seen as good/ok as long as you disagree with what is being censored pick another topic one that is less obvious something that you are on the fence about. is it right if Google decides that you only need to see one side of that debate (the side they agree with). The fact is that Google is the gateway to information and learning for most people in the US, and I suspect many other countries, as such they have a moral obligation to be neutral, there are some things we can all agree should be censored like Nazi rhetoric, CP etc. but the problem is that it is becoming increasingly obvious that they also meddle with other things that really should be an open debate. They feel they have the right to place their hand on the scale of research, study, and debate, and tip that scale how it suits them. That is a dangerous precedent to set. And in fact becomes just like a Nazi mindset, silence those you do not agree with, and those who criticize you, don't debate them, don't argue with them, don't ignore them, silence them. Only in modern terms instead of burning books you simply unlist them or push them back to places people never go like the 4th or 5th results page. Fine if they end up forgotten and unseen because they are crazy, offensive, obscene, but no one deserves to be silenced. The few exceptions to this rule are almost universally agreed upon, and further entries to that list should not be taken lightly.
"Human biodiversity," boy you more sus than Google.
the example he shows is a fucking neonazi site, like hello??
@@nuclearbiologist I mean that matches up with the implications of insisting on the reality of something like "human biodiversity" which isn't actually supported by any real research and is completely ignorant of the fact that environment is the main factor in any person's development and, given a few generations, completely eliminates any noticeable biological differences between people groups.
All that being said, I'm not sure why any even marginally intellectual or rational person would want to visit the Daily Stormer website but I can say based on my own experiments that not only can I find it indexed by Google, it's literally the second result after the wiki page and before the SPLC's writeup and there is little if any difference between Google and DuckDuckGo searches.
@@BlakeBigfoot Yeah this guys a crypto nazi for sure. No way around it.
@@nuclearbiologist I definitely got like a Libertarian/alt-right type of vibe from some of his other videos but it's sad to see it so extremely and blatantly confirmed.
If only people realised how politically biased Google was. I would not doubt that they are a significant contributor to today's political polarisation.
not anymore.
Yes, yandex reverse image search is great, that and tineye are my go-to when I'm searching images
Isn't TinEye better for reverse image searching then google or bing though?
@@SteveVedder122 instead youre giving it to the russian government which is much better right.
@@pessipaivarinne3174 Yeah it is. What can the Russian government do to you if you’re not in Russia? They won’t waste cyanide on you cause you downloaded a cracked game and they can’t really arrest you
@@pessipaivarinne3174 yeah, it is much better
@@pessipaivarinne3174 Just reminding everyone Yandex is making self-driving cars
bing is underrated
I'm using DuckDuckGo because of permission for choosing search region - this is very useful for learning languages and looking for results from specific countries.
Блин ты меня преследуешь xD
been stopped using google since 2020 because of their extreme left-wing bias
i was searching for a chad meme and the top results are talking about me being an inc*l for this like wtf?
in other hand duckduck do the job for me
Google doesn't "make" anything political, it just leans towards a political agenda that isn't necessarily yours. Politics can be imbued in everything, as it is basically human relations. When you claim something is "apolitical", it almost always just conforms to your specific world view.
I'm not saying Google results are without problems though, it can definitely be a problem if you only get results that conform to the political opinions that you already hold.
other people giving their opinions on the thing
"adl.org"
Ah yes, neo-nazis, fuck those bastards.
Hey can I get sources for your claims about Google politically censorshipping?
look up any political issue and see if you can get a right wing pov on it.
"human biodiversity"
sorry dude that got politicized some eight thousand years ago
actually daily stormer is on my google results lol
Funny that first thing he had to show as example was Daily Stormer.
You forgot about Ecosia, which is a private search engine that plants trees with its profit
Using search engines in 2022 has become absolutely useless. The results on the first page are only ads, ad pages, more ads and obsolete forum posts that are 20 years old.
Google is bad but I wouldn't fault them for intentionally trying to stop misinformation.
"They will do whatever spooky sh*t they please"😂😂
Largely the main thing I use a search engine for is making sure I spell words correctly because I'm dyslexic and my spelling is shit. So I really don't care if Google knows I can't spell a word like "inconspicuous" ... they can do whatever they want with that information, all I care about is I don't look like a dumbass who can't spell.
Firearms are not politicised ? It is by definition a politicised subject.
Statistics shouldn’t be politicised, but they are. I don’t care what Mancy Joe has to say in their shitty under researched op-ed, I just want plain numbers from a reliable source
If you care about quality of search results, there is only 1 good search engine
I run a small electronics company , I use Petal (Huawei's search engine) . because 1. there is nothing I know that Huawei doesn't know way better 2. I'm totally sure they won't go running to Washington with my data 3. it gets noticeably better over time 4. The text is easy on my older eyes.
A minor point about politicized results / the politicization of life; all of life involves power relations, we're at a moment in history with greater leeway to recognize and explore them.
And re: the example that follows, FBI crime stats truly are the best way to make a completely decontextualized argument for the inherent evil of a particular race. Also lol @ human biodiversity.