Hello, You are featured in some of my Masters classes. I appreciate your explanation of Bloom’s Taxonomy. 30 years ago, when I did my bachelors in communication studies, we spoke about the sender receiver model. Is it still up-to-date? I just took a class in neuroscience which had a different analysis of how people best learn. I feel like across the educational materials that I am being introduced to, we’re still using models from the 60s and 70s and I’m not sure that is the best approach. I love the pace of your presentations, it is engaging, easy to watch and understand.
I am a visual learner and this was a great way to explain what Bloom's Taxonomy is and how the learning process is achieved. Thank you for this. As an adult learner in nursing school it's all about testing.
Thank you so much for that. It was very helpful. I have three questions if you would be kind enough to answer. First, How can bloom's taxonomy be applied through online teaching? Second, if your working place does not use bloom's taxonomy or rather focus on the first two stages and has very strict rules about changing the rules, how can a teacher convince the school and the parents that students need all six stages to learn? Third, can an individual like a private tutor make use of bloom's taxonomy and how?
This is a wonderful researching methology. I’ve been searching an collecting components for a system [calling] that integrates my life experiences [portfolio/projects] and an individuals [Ikigai] or life’s work. System Mashup by combining experiences/thoughts/emotions.
Great video and thanks for making this Juliette. I think the first 3 were fully explained with examples, but the last 3 were explained in more summarised forms. So i will have to find out more about them. I'll see if you have other materials on these :)
I would like to know how this version or aspect of Blooms Taxonomy relates to High- Order Thinking, Middle- Order Thinking, and Low- Order Thinking- Blooms Taxonomy according to SLS1510: College Success / Social Science @ Tallahassee Community College... -Victor Williams / Journalism Major
Very well done and I am charmed and impressed with your ability to engage and convey. I'm wondering why your Bloom's graphic says comprehend and not understand, seeing as you have Create in the revised position.
Good day, I'd like to ask something for I am in my Pre-Service Teaching. Is it necessary to cover each of these levels in teaching a course? I hope I could hear from you. Thank you!
As far as I know, It's helpful to integrate different types of tasks and questions that reach each of these levels within each unit. Creating something might be more involved, so I wouldn't suggest putting a task that complex on a test. Saying that, your units should aim to have students be able to correctly answer questions at the evaluating level before you can be sure they "get it". I hope this helps a bit!
Dear Reader, " That is not what Blooms Taxonomy is rather than agree that you are totally wrong. What I mean to state is that what you have is a table that Blooms Taxonomy can help you come up with indirectly- speaking wise. The way that Blooms Taxonomy works produces a result that can be expressed with a table creation, graph representation, or chart reflection. This does not mean that the things themselves are compiled or collaborated in to Blooms Taxonomy because Blooms Taxonomy is not a solution such as something that can be reflected or projected- it has not evolved or emerged from a study, however, it is a study itself. That is what is the helpful agent in it when critically thinking as a resource for somebody with a block or struggle. I watched your video to passively exercise Social Science and I did not expect or intend to determine Blooms Taxonomy was detectable or engaged. This means that I think what you have in the presentation is what a person may create after Blooms Taxonomy. I do not think you are trying to describe Blooms Taxonomy with any graphics or imagery in the context that Blooms Taxonomy is instructed in because it is a skill not a tool. It starts with Low- Order Thinking then it moves to Middle- Order Thinking, and finally it goes in to High- Order Thinking before it has to have been navigated to a solution. Graphics will distract your client, demotivate him or her, and, at least, switch an intrapersonal intelligence around to an interpersonal intelligence on him or her on the spot. Perhaps you should listen to the lecture I listened to in Social Science called SLS1510: College Success unless you do not feel comfortable with Blooms Taxonomy material in an exclusive presentation at this time. Blooms Taxonomy is safe put as the opposite of Semmelweis Reflex or borderline to Status Quo Bias. I am a Journalism major and I live in my hometown Tallahassee, Florida- thank you, ma 'am. " Sincerely, Victor Williams
Dear Hostess, " Paul Warren questioned your Blooms Taxonomy last week. Perhaps you should find out from me how you can get Blooms Taxonomy in an exclusive version since I am a Journalism major, ace in Social Science, and free of Semmelweis Reflex as well as The Ikea Effect. Blooms Taxonomy is not what you are presenting- you have the result or equation of Blooms Taxonomy. High- Order Thinking, Middle- Order Thinking , and High- Order Thinking make up Blooms Taxonomy. It is not a tool but a skill so I think you have simply used the wrong context while being aware of critical thinking, describing Blooms Taxonomy, and representing the inevitable, which, is not going to indicate Blooms Taxonomy. I am intrinsically motivated and very enthusiastic so as a resource I repeat that I have Blooms Taxonomy in a lecture that is recent or up- to date that will help you. Once again Paul Warren, whose name is in my memory, questioned your presentation of Blooms Taxonomy. I can be reached at www.williamsvictor237@gmail.com. " Sincerely, Victor Williams
Hello,
You are featured in some of my Masters classes. I appreciate your explanation of Bloom’s Taxonomy. 30 years ago, when I did my bachelors in communication studies, we spoke about the sender receiver model. Is it still up-to-date? I just took a class in neuroscience which had a different analysis of how people best learn.
I feel like across the educational materials that I am being introduced to, we’re still using models from the 60s and 70s and I’m not sure that is the best approach.
I love the pace of your presentations, it is engaging, easy to watch and understand.
Hey Tally! We're not super familiar with the sender / receiver model. Bloom's was updated in 2001 and is still relevant to this day :)
You made my demo a lot easier! I’m glad to be part of your learning tribe!
best explantion of blooms taxonomy i have ever come across. Thank you
Glad it was helpful!
"Edutainment Akram Qulandri"
(Entertaining videos of education).
Nice explanation mam
Enjoyed this very much! It validates all my learning philosophies. Thank you.
I am a visual learner and this was a great way to explain what Bloom's Taxonomy is and how the learning process is achieved. Thank you for this. As an adult learner in nursing school it's all about testing.
Wow, that was great to the point. Thank you
Thank you so much for that. It was very helpful. I have three questions if you would be kind enough to answer. First, How can bloom's taxonomy be applied through online teaching? Second, if your working place does not use bloom's taxonomy or rather focus on the first two stages and has very strict rules about changing the rules, how can a teacher convince the school and the parents that students need all six stages to learn? Third, can an individual like a private tutor make use of bloom's taxonomy and how?
Extraordinary explaination. Tq you madam.
This is a wonderful researching methology. I’ve been searching an collecting components for a system [calling] that integrates my life experiences [portfolio/projects] and an individuals [Ikigai] or life’s work. System Mashup by combining experiences/thoughts/emotions.
This is the best explanation of Bloom's I've seen
a trick: you can watch series at flixzone. Me and my gf have been using them for watching loads of movies during the lockdown.
@Isaiah Marvin definitely, I've been watching on Flixzone for since november myself :D
helping some of our subject matter experts learn some instructional design. Super helpful video to help them understand the importance, thanks!
Excellent video. Thank you!
Nice and an informative video, which will definitely help those who involve in Training activities.
Great video and thanks for making this Juliette. I think the first 3 were fully explained with examples, but the last 3 were explained in more summarised forms. So i will have to find out more about them. I'll see if you have other materials on these :)
Very good explanation 👌👌
It is very nice and really informative video 👍👍👌👌!!
Simply loving it💞
I would like to know how this version or aspect of Blooms Taxonomy relates to High- Order Thinking, Middle- Order Thinking, and Low- Order Thinking- Blooms Taxonomy according to SLS1510: College Success / Social Science @ Tallahassee Community College...
-Victor Williams / Journalism Major
beautifully explained
Very well done and I am charmed and impressed with your ability to engage and convey. I'm wondering why your Bloom's graphic says comprehend and not understand, seeing as you have Create in the revised position.
Thank you so much
it was very helping, thank you.
Good day, I'd like to ask something for I am in my Pre-Service Teaching. Is it necessary to cover each of these levels in teaching a course?
I hope I could hear from you. Thank you!
As far as I know, It's helpful to integrate different types of tasks and questions that reach each of these levels within each unit. Creating something might be more involved, so I wouldn't suggest putting a task that complex on a test. Saying that, your units should aim to have students be able to correctly answer questions at the evaluating level before you can be sure they "get it". I hope this helps a bit!
@@MrClikestoteach Great! Thank you so much.
@@rheamae73 You’re absolutely welcome! I also have a video explaining Bloom’s Taxonomy on my own channel if you need any other information 😁
GREAT .. I LIKE IT
yes indeed!
Dear Reader,
" That is not what Blooms Taxonomy is rather than agree that you are totally wrong. What I mean to state is that what you have is a table that Blooms Taxonomy can help you come up with indirectly- speaking wise. The way that Blooms Taxonomy works produces a result that can be expressed with a table creation, graph representation, or chart reflection. This does not mean that the things themselves are compiled or collaborated in to Blooms Taxonomy because Blooms Taxonomy is not a solution such as something that can be reflected or projected- it has not evolved or emerged from a study, however, it is a study itself. That is what is the helpful agent in it when critically thinking as a resource for somebody with a block or struggle. I watched your video to passively exercise Social Science and I did not expect or intend to determine Blooms Taxonomy was detectable or engaged. This means that I think what you have in the presentation is what a person may create after Blooms Taxonomy. I do not think you are trying to describe Blooms Taxonomy with any graphics or imagery in the context that Blooms Taxonomy is instructed in because it is a skill not a tool. It starts with Low- Order Thinking then it moves to Middle- Order Thinking, and finally it goes in to High- Order Thinking before it has to have been navigated to a solution. Graphics will distract your client, demotivate him or her, and, at least, switch an intrapersonal intelligence around to an interpersonal intelligence on him or her on the spot. Perhaps you should listen to the lecture I listened to in Social Science called SLS1510: College Success unless you do not feel comfortable with Blooms Taxonomy material in an exclusive presentation at this time. Blooms Taxonomy is safe put as the opposite of Semmelweis Reflex or borderline to Status Quo Bias. I am a Journalism major and I live in my hometown Tallahassee, Florida- thank you, ma 'am. "
Sincerely,
Victor Williams
Wow! Outdated labels on the graphics and a totally wrong interpretation of Bloom's research.
Dear Hostess,
" Paul Warren questioned your Blooms Taxonomy last week. Perhaps you should find out from me how you can get Blooms Taxonomy in an exclusive version since I am a Journalism major, ace in Social Science, and free of Semmelweis Reflex as well as The Ikea Effect. Blooms Taxonomy is not what you are presenting- you have the result or equation of Blooms Taxonomy. High- Order Thinking, Middle- Order Thinking , and High- Order Thinking make up Blooms Taxonomy. It is not a tool but a skill so I think you have simply used the wrong context while being aware of critical thinking, describing Blooms Taxonomy, and representing the inevitable, which, is not going to indicate Blooms Taxonomy. I am intrinsically motivated and very enthusiastic so as a resource I repeat that I have Blooms Taxonomy in a lecture that is recent or up- to date that will help you. Once again Paul Warren, whose name is in my memory, questioned your presentation of Blooms Taxonomy. I can be reached at www.williamsvictor237@gmail.com. "
Sincerely,
Victor Williams