In summary, compounds carry different properties from their constitueting elements especially ones from heterogenous elements due to drastic changes in their electronic configs and energy changes🙃
i was questioning this today since it made no sense to me how 2 very flamable elements can't catch fire thanks alot this also answered another question of why we can't artifialy make water?
This video is slightly inaccurate. For something to burn you need heat, fuel source, oxidizer, AND pressure. Because we live on Earth in the atmosphere, the atmosphere is the pressure. Without pressure, it's extremely difficult to get anything to burn.
To burn 🔥 a fuel it needs 3 materials they are :1.Fuel, 2.oxygen , 3.Ignisious temperature 🌡 It doesn't need only 2 materials if any one material is missing from the above mentioned 3 materials the fuel doesn't catch fire. Pls correct it .
It's like asking why doesn't ash burn despite being made of an obviously flammable substance. Well duh, it's already been oxidized. Allegedly high temperature steam will actually catch fire but is this really the correct term for it when all that is really happening is the highly energetic atoms of dissociated water try to recombine but then release more heat by that burning burn and so just turn back into high temperature steam which dissociates again in order to absorb some of the immense heat?
It's the byproduct of oxidation. When you oxidize iron you get rust, iron oxide. When you oxidize hydrogen you get water. Water is the "rust" of hydrogen, hydrogen oxide.
So I made an experiment. And I did it several times to proof it. I heated a water drop 💧 extremely fast to an very high temperature. And then the water burns in a funny way for a view seconds.
The earth stands in & out of the water. After the reign of Christ in the seventh millennium, heaven and earth will pass away with a great noise and all the works will burn up. "By him all things consist." All he has to do is change the pattern of molecules. Who knows, maybe he'll let man do that for him.
![ALLY - OH MY! [ REACTION ] 'Amarin Nitibhon' #ALLY_OHMY #ALLY #allynitibhon #แอลลี่](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nX9qpHjVfbQ/mqdefault.jpg)
2:14 is where the video actually starts
Not exactly, it develops to the better understanding of the content!
In summary, compounds carry different properties from their constitueting elements especially ones from heterogenous elements due to drastic changes in their electronic configs and energy changes🙃
Thank you! Saved me a few minutes :)
That makes a lot of sense and that’s a good analogy with the ash
Thanks 🙂
The only thing I got out of that was out. Water is already burnt.
i was questioning this today since it made no sense to me how 2 very flamable elements can't catch fire thanks alot this also answered another question of why we can't artifialy make water?
water doesn't catch afire, but it boiling away is paradoxically gine up in smoke!
we can artificially make water, its just that a lot of the hydrogen needed for this artificial water will come from electrolysis of water itself.
Thanks a lot for the video!
This video is slightly inaccurate. For something to burn you need heat, fuel source, oxidizer, AND pressure. Because we live on Earth in the atmosphere, the atmosphere is the pressure. Without pressure, it's extremely difficult to get anything to burn.
Why water can't burn, because water is ashes of hydrogen and oxygen. 😅
To burn 🔥 a fuel it needs 3 materials they are :1.Fuel, 2.oxygen , 3.Ignisious temperature 🌡
It doesn't need only 2 materials if any one material is missing from the above mentioned 3 materials the fuel doesn't catch fire.
Pls correct it .
Nah it's right
what makes hydrogen and oxygen more flammable
They didn't answer their own question.
It's like asking why doesn't ash burn despite being made of an obviously flammable substance. Well duh, it's already been oxidized.
Allegedly high temperature steam will actually catch fire but is this really the correct term for it when all that is really happening is the highly energetic atoms of dissociated water try to recombine but then release more heat by that burning burn and so just turn back into high temperature steam which dissociates again in order to absorb some of the immense heat?
Even though it is a oxidizer?
water is not an oxidiser
It's the byproduct of oxidation. When you oxidize iron you get rust, iron oxide. When you oxidize hydrogen you get water. Water is the "rust" of hydrogen, hydrogen oxide.
So I made an experiment. And I did it several times to proof it. I heated a water drop 💧 extremely fast to an very high temperature. And then the water burns in a funny way for a view seconds.
Because water is the boss of this planet.
If water doesn't burn then why petrol burn petrol also has hydrogen and oxygen
petrol burns because it is mostly made of Hydrogen and Carbon, not Hydrogen and Oxygen
Yes That’s Exactly my question and I am replying here in order to get the answer if someone knows😅😅
only the hydrogen is combustible air isnt combustible
Air contains 20% oxygen, why do you think internal combustion engines have an air intake?
@@jpt7342 Air itself isn't combustible - we say the fuel (reducing agent) is combustible, not the oxidiser
Oxygen is an accelerator. That's how a torch works. It can be explosive. Men have created cars that run on water.
The earth stands in & out of the water. After the reign of Christ in the seventh millennium, heaven and earth will pass away with a great noise and all the works will burn up. "By him all things consist." All he has to do is change the pattern of molecules. Who knows, maybe he'll let man do that for him.