More Bizarre Attempts at Perpetual Motion Machines

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @agalah408
    @agalah408 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +501

    "Lisa! In this house we OBEY the laws of thermodynamics"

    • @UnionYes1021
      @UnionYes1021 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      And you don’t want to have to pay the fine that comes with breaking the third law!

    • @jeanaprewitt9658
      @jeanaprewitt9658 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

    • @bioLarzen
      @bioLarzen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      "Physics - it's not just a fancy idea, it's the law." ;)

    • @tturi2
      @tturi2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      enforced by the second law

    • @kimcheelove
      @kimcheelove 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      this perpetual motion device just keeps going faster and faster!

  • @michaeldowson6988
    @michaeldowson6988 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

    There already is a perpetual motion machine. It's generally referred to as a 'two year old'.

    • @PLUV1
      @PLUV1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      sadly those 2 year old only keeps in motion when under surveillance .

    • @iamdigory
      @iamdigory 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Actually they do require external power, if you remove their food,... you will go to jail

    • @johnfriedl7126
      @johnfriedl7126 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@iamdigory they generate more energy than they use. They can charge 3 hours of energy with 20 minutes of napping.

    • @CoffeeBacon
      @CoffeeBacon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      after cost of fuel and maintenance your losing energy... like a lot...

    • @lotion5238
      @lotion5238 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The children yearn for the mines

  • @CountJeffula
    @CountJeffula 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +106

    What’s funny is that even if they made a perpetual motion machine, that isn’t enough. You need perpetual excess motion to extract usable energy from it. Just barely being able to reset itself means no energy left over to extract for usable ends. What a Sisyphean task. Lol

    • @holysol
      @holysol 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      one must imagine thermodynamics happy...

    • @spookyleo2589
      @spookyleo2589 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      making a perpetual motion machine breaks one rule of thermodynamics, getting energy from it breaks 2. I really wonder if there is a "perpetual motion machine" that breaks all 3😂😂

    • @bipolarminddroppings
      @bipolarminddroppings 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@spookyleo2589 the third law is about entropy and temperature. Essentially entropy approaches zero as temperature approaches absolute zero, if there's zero entropy there's zero motion and zero energy. I'm not sure how the hell you would get a perpetual motion device working at absolute zero...

  • @Joseph-z7s3b
    @Joseph-z7s3b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +635

    Perpetual motion exists. It's Simon moving from channel to channel and subject to subject. Good God Simon. Don't just do something. Sit there.

    • @williestyle35
      @williestyle35 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      As a matter of fact, Simon was wearing this exact same outfit in another video I saw on a different one of his channels', two days ago. lol He must film nearly a dozen or so of these at a time...

    • @michaelhowell2326
      @michaelhowell2326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Solid comment.

    • @murrayscott9546
      @murrayscott9546 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Batteries not included.

    • @MSjackiesaunders
      @MSjackiesaunders 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😅😅😅

    • @MSjackiesaunders
      @MSjackiesaunders 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@williestyle35 he is known for being parsimonious with his clothing budget.

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    0:30 - Chapter 1 - The drinking bird
    3:05 - Chapter 2 - Perpetual marble machine
    5:25 - Chapter 3 - Magnetic fidget spinner motor
    8:25 - Chapter 4 - Dreadco perpetual motion machine
    12:00 - Chapter 5 - Perpetual energy from god

    • @DrWhat2
      @DrWhat2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You forgot to discuss Besslers Wheel. Unless I missed it

  • @etunimenisukunimeni1302
    @etunimenisukunimeni1302 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1508

    There's that old saying: the hardest part of inventing a perpetual motion machine is to figure out where to hide the batteries

    • @beginnereasy
      @beginnereasy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      It's irrelevant

    • @AGnorTheChannel
      @AGnorTheChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

      ​@@beginnereasy considering the multiple mentions of batteries in this video and that no one has yet actually invented such a machine as far as we're aware, it's entirely relevant.

    • @samuelgarrod8327
      @samuelgarrod8327 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      That's the first time I've ever heard it so it's not old.

    • @Vagabond_Etranger
      @Vagabond_Etranger 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The duality of the irrelevant makes it relevant

    • @Inquisitor-Doi
      @Inquisitor-Doi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      ​@@beginnereasysays the man with a real irrelevant statement.

  • @prestonsingersoll
    @prestonsingersoll 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +261

    Holy shit that last one hit way too close to home. When I was 13 my dad quit his teaching job and cashed out his retirement because he thought that god had told him the designs for an AC solid state battery. He drove my family to bankruptcy trying to put together an incoherent non-sensical mess of a battery that never worked.

    • @MizterTonik
      @MizterTonik 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      You hate to hear it, man. That sucks.

    • @vladimirjar3800
      @vladimirjar3800 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

      if god is powering the perpetual motion machine then it is not perpetual motion because it is powerd by an out side force

    • @MichaelWinter-ss6lx
      @MichaelWinter-ss6lx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      He was too far ahead of his time, as solid state batteries now are being researched.

    • @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x
      @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🙄 😒​@@vladimirjar3800

    • @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x
      @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Sorry to hear that. I'm no psychiatrist but that sounds like some undiagnosed mental health issues.

  • @johnlewan1114
    @johnlewan1114 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +220

    Up next, 50 channels you didn't know Simon narrates.

    • @CoPoint
      @CoPoint 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ...part 1, beginning of a LONG series 😁...

    • @MindBodySoulOk
      @MindBodySoulOk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fascinating eggskull however

    • @MattBellzminion
      @MattBellzminion 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Although their production may suggest to some that the Infographics team is a perpetual motion machine, you have to keep feeding them.

    • @tertrih9078
      @tertrih9078 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha. So true

    • @melianio1
      @melianio1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thats more a mega project

  • @Reegareth
    @Reegareth 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    I have no idea why were so obsessed with the idea of a perpetual motion machine for energy when we have a massive fusion reactor that we're all literally floating around...

    • @ryshellso526
      @ryshellso526 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Chill out musk...

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is a pretty big cultural element to it. when you rubberneck the free energy communities, you find that they tend to be rather conspiratorial and anti semitic.. their world is dominated by the idea that the world is wrong and that a group of (unworthy) people are intentionally keeping the world they deserve away from them. Kinda like flat earthers or sovereign citizens.. and once they have that shared belief of fighting the great evil and persecution for being superior, they bond over it.
      Can't get that from something that works.

    • @joeshmoe7967
      @joeshmoe7967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Well, the fusion reactor gets blocked for a good part of the 'day', plus clouds etc. Now if someone could invent a pocket sized device to use the output of the reactor, in a meaningful way. I mean NOT a 3 watt phone charger etc. Or run your house, but not cost $30K up front. 'Free' is always an attractive option. Unfortunately there is no 'free', anywhere.

    • @Reegareth
      @Reegareth 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@joeshmoe7967 Those are all completely fair points. The sun does quite a lot more than just sunlight though. It powers our hydro power and wind power as well. My point is that I think we would be better served trying to utilize those resources better than trying to make a wheel spin forever without stopping. The most fundamental understanding of our universe is that you can't get more energy out of a system than you put in. The most ideal result in my mind of a perpetual motion machine is a way to perfectly store energy without loss. That is the best possible scenario and use of such a thing if it were possible that I can think of.

    • @kiriuxeosa8716
      @kiriuxeosa8716 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because we want to create our own power that we can use and abuse without any restraint
      If you have your own perpetual motuon machine you can convert the motion into power and power can be used to create craft manufacture and manipulate
      People would sell energy for money while others would aim to create that which could not be made due to power time or labor
      "Money, power, respect
      Is the key to life"

  • @velzekt
    @velzekt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    Every machine can be a perpetual motion machine if you apply enough external energy to it

    • @rashidisw
      @rashidisw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That is why I always advocates to siphon Earth rotational momentum for power generator.

    • @meloney
      @meloney 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      if we just shove infinite energy into it, we should get infinite -x out!

  • @damaddog8065
    @damaddog8065 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    As the universe is not subject to the laws of physics, time and space are basically magic, a perpetual motion machine is possible, until we figure out what makes it go, and then it is not.

  • @cursedcat6467
    @cursedcat6467 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I invented a perpetual motion machine, I did this by lighting a match, there is a wave of light that is perpetually moving through space forever in one direction

  • @ERIK-457
    @ERIK-457 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    "So, dad, how does perpetual motion work?"
    "That's the neat thing, it doesn't"

  • @donaldasayers
    @donaldasayers 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I'm a horologist and I'm familiar with one particular type of mystery clock. The clock in question has only one hand which can be spun feely, but it always comes to rest pointing to the correct time and left to itself, the hand rotates in 12 hours always indicating the correct time, with no obvious means of propulsion. I know how it works.
    When I saw Jones' 'perpetual motion' machine I postulated a connection, so I made my own version at the school where I worked. It ran for many years, intriguing and annoying staff and pupils alike.
    My youngest aged about three, dismissed it with the opinion the it 'had batteries in it.' He was correct.

    • @jaelwyn
      @jaelwyn หลายเดือนก่อน

      And here I was thinking "so… you had a pendulum?"

  • @eblkii6314
    @eblkii6314 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I don't need perpetual motion; I just need something that will last 100 years, and then turn the crank again.

    • @leosmith848
      @leosmith848 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      nuclear decay heat reactor.

  • @Ed_Stuckey
    @Ed_Stuckey 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    0:21 Harbor Freight free multimeter shows tools of a true scientist.

    • @lelokong6898
      @lelokong6898 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Sad that they don't do, free tape measures anymore,

    • @drkastenbrot
      @drkastenbrot 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@lelokong6898 the tape measure is a decent free tool but the multimeter is a serious hazard with the completely unsuitable fuses inside.

    • @SteveSiegelin
      @SteveSiegelin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When you need multiple meters they work fine. They are as accurate as my $150 meter but they have no security circuit so the are easy to destroy. I use up to 5 sometimes so that I can have live readings from multiple points of my projects at the same time. It is cheaper than an oscilloscope yet still pretty accurate. Bad batteries will give you bad readings but the meters cost $7-$12 and as long as you use a good meter to calibrate initially you will be fine.

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Free with purchase tyvm

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@drkastenbrotand that's a hazard how?

  • @murrayscott9546
    @murrayscott9546 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I once tried to invent a perpetual motion machine. Piece of junk, I threw it away. Stupid thing kept going faster and faster !

    • @g8Words
      @g8Words 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "faster and faster".... until it flew apart. See that's not really perpetual motion either. 😂

  • @stephen3164
    @stephen3164 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The dollar store used to sell these tiny solar powered plastic trinkets that would “move back and forth”. Someone gave us a few and we put in the windowsill. Every morning when the sun came up, you could hear them clattering away until sunset.
    Now had they made the solar panel twice as large and put a rechargeable battery in the base, it’s possible those things would last all night as well.
    Of course this uses SOLAR POWER, so far from perpetual motion - but the concept to apply to a “perpetual motion” machine is clear: design a machine that uses Earth’s natural cycles to capture energy and convert to motion. The drinking bird is a close match to this - and if placed somewhere that either never ran out of water, or was placed somewhere the cooling effects could occur “naturally”, then it would appear as perpetual motion.
    All this is really doing though is the same as wind or solar “renewable” power: taking unused energy from around us, and capturing it for use.

    • @EldenRingplayer407
      @EldenRingplayer407 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you trying to say that if the system with the drinking bird was placed in a tightly closed (and preferably glass?) box in order to prevent loss of water, and there was a tube above the bird (plus maybe something else) that somehow forced the evaporated water to return to the cup, then the entire system could become perpetually in motion?

  • @adrielburned6924
    @adrielburned6924 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +153

    If my 42 yr old little brother is reading this; I hope this video finally convinces you that your magnet perpetual motion design WILL NOT WORK. I'm sorry, but it was a good try. 😊 Love ya brother! ❤

    • @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667
      @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually your brother is correct that the only possible way to even conceive of or attempt to produce a machine of perpetual motion would be through magnetism. Electromagnetism is the strongest force in the universe. The only reason there is no way to make a perpetual motion machine, even with magnetism, is that all things eventually corrode and break down and so will a perpetual motion machine. Even if successfully harnessing the magnetism to gain perpetual motion. That truly is the only folly in your brothers thinking so I would give him a bit more credit than you are.

    • @Chris47368
      @Chris47368 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      I came up with a similar concept when i was 14 or 15... needless to say i was disappointed to learn thermodynamics makes such a thing impossible shortly after 😂
      Reality truly can be disappointing 😢

    • @JoeSmith-cy9wj
      @JoeSmith-cy9wj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You might want to encourage your little brother.
      After all, every atom in the universe, as far as anyone can tell, is a perpetual motion machine.

    • @jasonbutler4867
      @jasonbutler4867 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I have made a beta version of what I’m assuming is your brother’s idea of a spinning, magnetic electrical system and the second you add any resistance to it won’t work even using the most super super magnets

    • @rebirth_mishap
      @rebirth_mishap 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is name isn't Issac is it?

  • @Nickrick175
    @Nickrick175 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    humans like to act like they know everything until a new discovery happens.

  • @ABD5667
    @ABD5667 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    All motion needs energy. Friction stops motion. In the end a person needs more energy to overcome friction, for perpetual motion perpetual energy is needed

    • @pykapuka
      @pykapuka 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I dont want to be rude, but everything you wrote is wrong.

  • @uplink-on-yt
    @uplink-on-yt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The one powered by God was probably the closest to PM of all. Just replace God with The Sun, and you actually have something. Sure, "an unimaginably long time" is not the same as "perpetual", but it comes damn close.

    • @Sphendrana
      @Sphendrana หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If perpetual were simply to mean "my entire lifetime" then it's absolutely perpetual ENOUGH lol.

  • @my_dear_friend_
    @my_dear_friend_ หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    An 'almost perpetual' motion machine is just a very efficient machine.

  • @alecdiastra
    @alecdiastra 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Would love to see your take on attempts to create boyancy based machines. Like chains with floats connected that are only in water on one side.

  • @micahfoley9572
    @micahfoley9572 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    I discovered perpetual motion when I was a teenager. All you need is a bottle of hand lotion, an empty house, and unfettered access to the internet.

    • @maritimeus
      @maritimeus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Micah Foley rubs it out to dudes 😂

    • @micahfoley9572
      @micahfoley9572 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@maritimeus sorry, i don't think i get the joke, could you explain it to me?

    • @maritimeus
      @maritimeus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@micahfoley9572 🧐

    • @apokalypthoapokalypsys9573
      @apokalypthoapokalypsys9573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@micahfoley9572Refractory period: I'm about to end this kid's whole kinetic energy reserve

    • @chriscreations8853
      @chriscreations8853 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@micahfoley9572 Just described the ideal environment for Masturbating. The joke is around the idea that if you need perpetual motion you can go an jurk off.

  • @flamesofhellstudio
    @flamesofhellstudio 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The entire universe is the closest thing to a perpetual motion machine and it's not even perpetual, it just has a lot of energy.

    • @methylene5
      @methylene5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It might be perpetual.

  • @martinstallard2742
    @martinstallard2742 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    0:27 the drinking bird
    3:02 perpetual marble machine
    5:20 magnetic fidget spinning motor
    8:21 dreadco perpetual motion machine
    11:57 perpetual energy from god

    • @MrSunDevil23
      @MrSunDevil23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My ex-wife called me the perpetual drinking bird…

    • @thetroll1247
      @thetroll1247 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Still watching lol thank you

    • @kingnaga619
      @kingnaga619 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      God bless

  • @MrMaramor
    @MrMaramor 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Even the sun is not perpetual. But perhaps perpetual is the wrong objective.

  • @julianhigginson5946
    @julianhigginson5946 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    My kids have come close to inventing perpetually motion I turn the lights off and they leave them on. It never stops

    • @westwonic
      @westwonic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same with the toilet seat.....

  • @BeardedSte
    @BeardedSte หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for this video! I keep telling my kids that perpetual motion is impossible and they repeatedly try and prove me wrong with TH-cam videos claiming to show devices that operate perpetually. Now I can bust the perpetual motion myth to them with this video.

    • @NarwahlGaming
      @NarwahlGaming 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      First, have them try the 'buttered toast tied to the back of a cat' trick..😂

  • @lawnmowerdude
    @lawnmowerdude 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I got an ad on TH-cam the other day trying to sell me perpetual motion plans. What a crock of garbage. It went on and on about how amazing it was and took them 5 whole minutes of constantly hyping this pile of garbage up to show a two second video of it “working”. What amounted to two stepper motors coupled together with a battery and a bunch of useless circuits.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There a much better version, where you buy a large set of plans for big bucks ...which turn out to be copied from several free-energy websites. It's perpetual motion: selling free stuff.

    • @AlainSiscan
      @AlainSiscan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah the battery would be the dead giveaway

    • @Sphendrana
      @Sphendrana หลายเดือนก่อน

      LMAO YT really needs to just abandon all ads and start over. Anything can get past the filters now. I'm surprised we don't have troll ads of just straight up hentai games. OH WAIT......

  • @MouseGoat
    @MouseGoat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "its Perpetual Motion!"
    "of you device?"
    "no people will Perpetually though the use of motion replace the batteries with new working ones"

  • @wags9777
    @wags9777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The last inventor probably reinvented the arc of the covenant on a large scale but well never know. 😂

  • @35ABSTRACT
    @35ABSTRACT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    So enlarge the bird by a factor of 100 and place it next to a lake. Voila. My work here is done.

    • @akulkis
      @akulkis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Not perpetual motion, but the energy input (ambient heat) is relatively free.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Already been done, in the 1970s. The "Minto Wheel," was four or six giant dipping-birds on the same axel, made with huge propane tanks, dipping into solar-heated warm water.

    • @someguy15721
      @someguy15721 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wbeaty So, what would have happened if someone hooked it up to a generator? so it could possibly produce energy?

    • @Briggsby
      @Briggsby 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@someguy15721I mean, yeah, you *can* do that. Or you can use that space to build a 50kw solar array that has no moving parts, produces hundreds of times more energy, and doesn't involve flammable gasses under pressure.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@someguy15721 I think they did. Gearbox to step it up. Wally Minto. But the efficiency is terrible. Instead use a giant solar mirror focused on a boiler, like they do today in Nevada etc.

  • @therealjammit
    @therealjammit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    As a kid I thought about making a motor that ran off of opposing magnets. But I never thought for one second I was making a perpetual motion machine. I was thinking of a motor that used magnets as an energy storage and expected the magnets to get weaker and run out of magnetic field or "power". My idea was to use them in portable tape recorders to drive the tape path and use auxiliary battery power just to power the amplifier since the electric motors used the majority of the battery power. A mechanical feedback hooked up to a mechanical brake was used for speed regulation or to turn it off.

    • @JackBWatkins
      @JackBWatkins 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So I assume the magnets wouldn’t erase the tape.

    • @akulkis
      @akulkis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@JackBWatkins
      No. Magnetic tape is stable in weak, non-oscillating magnetic fields.
      Erasure requires a high intensity, oscillating magnetic fields which decreases in intensity.

    • @MichaelPoage666
      @MichaelPoage666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      On magnets erasing tape, I was a college radio DJ. We had a magnetic tape eraser. It's basically a big, square, electromagnet with a hole to pass the cassette or other magnetic media through. This thing was big and heavy and plugged into a wall outlet. The power of magnets to erase magnetic tape is kind of exaggerated in most people's minds. It takes a pretty serious magnet to do it effectively.

    • @therealjammit
      @therealjammit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@JackBWatkins If you put them too close to the tape, yes. But remember the electric motor also has magnets. Some sort of shielding would have been necessary. It's all moot because the magnet motor would have never worked anyway.

    • @JackBWatkins
      @JackBWatkins 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@therealjammit
      Well I was just trying to be funny, but instead all of you gave me some great information. Best part was nobody was mean and everyone stayed positive. Best TH-cam thread ever.

  • @ArtUniverse
    @ArtUniverse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The biggest challenge in making a perpetual motion machine is hiding the energy source.

    • @ulvschmidt7174
      @ulvschmidt7174 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My favourite are those clocks that get powered by the heat difference in the day night cycle

    • @commitfelonyfeline
      @commitfelonyfeline 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Wow, this joke is even funnier the 100th time

    • @OttoByOgraffey
      @OttoByOgraffey 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So original

    • @richard--s
      @richard--s 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This joke is still necessary, because too many people believe in scam.

    • @Sphendrana
      @Sphendrana หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OttoByOgraffey Ditto to your comment. At least one is necessary while the other isn't. I won't give you any hints as to which is which. You can likely figure that out. I hope.

  • @JaredBrewerAerospace
    @JaredBrewerAerospace 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    @12:40 I love how genuinely school-girl giddy Simon gets.🤗

  • @charleediaven6278
    @charleediaven6278 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A self trained Mechanical Engineer and home inventor, a friend of mine used the magnetic wheel gadget. However his wheel also had water pouring on it, like the old water wheels. He was proud of his magnets accelerating the wheel to incredible speeds. When last seen he was tweaking the magnet switching mechanics. I never had the heart to point out the many flaws. Water wheels have great power and easily charged the low voltage DC batteries and for the solenoids. I never had the heart to say it was not perpetual motion which he claimed.

  • @AdamtheRed-
    @AdamtheRed- 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Gotta say that thumbnail looks like the most useless machine that the AI could come up with. None of the gears connect. It looks neat though.

    • @brionfranks478
      @brionfranks478 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AdamtheRed- a Rube Goldberg contraption for sure...

    • @SpydersByte
      @SpydersByte 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol right? Definitely an AI generated image, those gears are completely pointless. Also the teeth near the screw look a bit wonky

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well the mechanism is sound though. Obviously not for perpetual motion since that doesn't exist. But in theory the horizontal gear turns the spiral gear, which oscillates the bar above it back and forth, which on a particular stroke pushes the vertical gears (which should be clock gears) that rotate the bottom horizontal gear, which turns the spiral gear, which oscillates the bar which turns the two vertical gears etc etc.

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@A_Stereotypical_Heretic none of the gears actually connect. It's a nonsense AI image. Look at the left most vertical gear. It doesn't have a top, past the horizontal bar, that also seems useless. The bottom horizontal gear is fixed to the base with the screws that can be seen, and it seems like all the vertical gears would be inside of it where they intersect. It looks neat, though. The center, what looks like a worm gear, isn't actually a gear at all. It's like four inverted bowls on the shaft. No power is being transferred there.

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AdamtheRed- i mean yeah of course it's a garbage image, but you can understand the deeply buried gist.

  • @Uajd-hb1qs
    @Uajd-hb1qs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I found out about perpetual motion machines as a kid, I couldn’t help but think up a few concepts myself. I even got chatting with my science teacher at school who also theorised a perpetual machine himself when he was younger. His concept wasn’t really perpetual motion, more perpetual energy conversion. It consisted of a bank of lightbulbs contained in a box made from basically solar panels that would convert the light and heat energy from the bulbs into electricity that would then be fed back to the bulbs to, in theory, keep them indefinitely lit. The problem being that every component would have to be 100% efficient in its task, which no modern electrical equipment is capable of. My own concept was a self-propelling A/C unit. The idea was a Stirling engine linked mechanically to two fan rotors geared in a way that one rotor would spin faster than the other. The Stirling engine would be started with a heat source first to spin up the fans. The fan geared to spin faster would force air over the slower fan which itself was geared to the crank of the Stirling engine, sending the power back to the faster fan until an equilibrium was reached. The heat source could then be removed and the Stirling engine could be allowed to operate as a motor to create cold air. My guess for how this wouldn’t work is the supposed “equilibrium” of the two fans creating a sort of feedback loop would be impossible without needing to artificially energise the airflow.

  • @YUProductionz
    @YUProductionz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Theres a new saying that its not truly a perpetual motion video unless there is a comment about that old saying: The most difficult thing about building perpetual motion machines is figuring out where to hide the battery.

    • @commitfelonyfeline
      @commitfelonyfeline 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol yes

    • @lobstrosity7163
      @lobstrosity7163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's the "all mushrooms are edible once" of popular physics.

    • @Sphendrana
      @Sphendrana หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the crazy part? BOTH ARE NECESSARY COMMENTS TO MAKE.
      Literally found another perpetual motor grifter on YT who's been commenting on science/chemistry related content, their channel is just a few videos of some blueprint shenanigans, and a link to their paypal. The scary part? There are more believers than educated people in the comments 🤦‍♀

  • @killerqueenbiteszadusto1771
    @killerqueenbiteszadusto1771 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    The hardest part of having a cool machine is telling people to shut up because they don’t know what perpetual motion machines even are.

  • @SarahC2
    @SarahC2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    2:55 That's my piccy from my Flickr page! Wooooo! Internet famous. Thanks Simon!

    • @steve-vx3lx
      @steve-vx3lx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah he obvs doesnt care by looks of it...kudos though🫡

  • @dbblues.9168
    @dbblues.9168 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    There's an old saying: the hardest part of inventing a perpetual motion machine is figuring out how to get money for it on crowd funding sites.

    • @juliuspekar7620
      @juliuspekar7620 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you mean "a new saying". crowd funding sites havent been around long enough . I know it's a joke, and a funny one

    • @xenostim
      @xenostim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that's right, @@juliuspekar7620. you tell them! we are NOT OLD! 😭😭

    • @Sphendrana
      @Sphendrana หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's actually not even that hard. Grifters are really out there phishing for idiot whales lmao. I'm actually just here looking through the comments for this one particular YT channel that has creeped up recently stating "my perpetual motion machine is better, check out my design" and is literally some blueprint garbage presentations and a link to their paypal. The comments legit terrify me because there are more believers than educated people in them XD

  • @TheMNWolf
    @TheMNWolf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    From someone who loves shows like Penn and Teller Fool Us, the best illusions are the ones that are extremely simple but made to look extremely complex. I am certain I could replicate the Dreadco machine believably. I am not certain it would use the same mechanism, but I'm relatively certain you couldn't tell it apart from the original.

  • @stevehiggins1263
    @stevehiggins1263 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    People trying to one up physics is hilarious to me.

  • @Diehydro
    @Diehydro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The drinking bird you might know from such films as “Alien” & “Darkman”

    • @Nick-v7b3l
      @Nick-v7b3l 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Darkman was the first thing I thought of. An underrated Liam Neeson and Sam Raimi classic!

    • @Diehydro
      @Diehydro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Nick-v7b3l Totally agree

    • @squidly2112
      @squidly2112 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I had one of those birds as a kid

    • @mattburley3189
      @mattburley3189 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Darkman!! Thank you! That was driving me nuts trying to remember.

    • @Diehydro
      @Diehydro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mattburley3189 🙂

  • @DavidBenner-cy4zl
    @DavidBenner-cy4zl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    As the Universe expands it is winding down. Nothing physical is perpetual.

    • @michaeldowson6988
      @michaeldowson6988 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ...and human stupidity isn't physical, so...

    • @mitchsmith7472
      @mitchsmith7472 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The universe is speeding up

    • @DavidBenner-cy4zl
      @DavidBenner-cy4zl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @mitchsmith7472 yes. To our extremely limited understanding. And going to end one day

    • @samuelgarrod8327
      @samuelgarrod8327 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@mitchsmith7472No it isn't. Expansion may be accelerating but that doesn't mean 'speed' is increasing.That would make a nonsense of the arrow of time, atrophy.

    • @mitchsmith7472
      @mitchsmith7472 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@samuelgarrod8327 yes it is. Anyway

  • @IsaacDaSaxaphone
    @IsaacDaSaxaphone 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Perpetual motion exists, spinning objects in space

  • @kenbrown2808
    @kenbrown2808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I have access to a system that will remain in motion until the heat death of the universe. I call it, "the universe"

    • @Blitterbug
      @Blitterbug 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes. Been looking for someone to state this.

    • @Patralgan
      @Patralgan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I buy it for 10 dollars

    • @Sphendrana
      @Sphendrana หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh. Oh that's clever. 10/10 lol

  • @gregh378
    @gregh378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm a complete sceptic of perpetual motion, but I am fascinated by the approaches. It started when I was a kid and hooked 6 dynamos up to a single motor and was perplexed when they would produce enough energy to power the motor.

  • @Guedez1
    @Guedez1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    A good point that was not mentioned on the magnet wheels:
    The reason people even consider that it could ever be possible is because most people have an extremely rudimentary intuition for how magnets work
    They make continuous force fields
    They don't just make in front of the magnets where N pushes N
    They also do it to the sides
    Sliding two N facing magnets against one another takes exactly as much energy than they produce when they push each other apart
    You are better to think of magnets as "springy gears" than "pushing force fields"

  • @nigelbrazier835
    @nigelbrazier835 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Never give up. We don't know everything & therefore can't dispel tech we haven't discovered yet. I believe a lot of what we know was discovered years ago but we lost the technology . Never stop thinking about the possibilities.

  • @Reece-u3f
    @Reece-u3f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Bots everywhere within the first minute of uploading 😂

  • @drkastenbrot
    @drkastenbrot 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    my personal conclusion for one of the daedalus machines is compressed air at low pressure being blown onto the sides of the bicycle wheel. its dead simple, low maintenance and extremely reliable, and all parts needed are clearly there.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's not it. When his machine was exhibited at Boston's Museum of Science, we had it apart every nine months, for "servicing." It would only run for about that long.

  • @nicholascook9584
    @nicholascook9584 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So Floyd just described a nuclear reactor with a pretty good half life to make power for a while, or at least that is what sounds like.

    • @nobody7817
      @nobody7817 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Eh... someone from the new Kingdom speaks. (Formerly a Queendom)... (God rest her soul, though).

  • @diggerpete9334
    @diggerpete9334 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    A stable electron field around a nucleus in empty space.

  • @SuperRiki81
    @SuperRiki81 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    2:32 Thhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhe speed…

    • @lilduck6982
      @lilduck6982 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhis design

  • @Palemagpie
    @Palemagpie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love designing these things.
    Yea theyre an impossible project. But thats the fun.
    Super good for lateral thinking.
    Ive developed some actually useful components and stuff out of it.

  • @lauriepenner350
    @lauriepenner350 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I still say there's got to be a market for a "nearly" perpetual motion machine that generates unlimited power as long as you pay some kid minimum wage to give it a push whenever it slows down.

    • @jerotoro2021
      @jerotoro2021 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I think most everything is "nearly" perpetual, as long as you keep adding fuel and replacing worn parts.

    • @danielpope6498
      @danielpope6498 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That would only ever output the amount of power the kid was able to produce. Whats the point then?

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well yeah, if you spin a bicycle wheel in the vacuum of space far away from Earth it will spin there for a very long time. But guess what?! Even that will stop eventually from the gravitational pull of the Sun and other planets.... eventually.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Man, if we could only get a magnet-destroying motor to work. That's the kind where it keeps spinning for an hour, but the magnets get weaker and weaker. It would be the start of a million-dollar toy industry. (And, note that if we use ceramic magnets as the "fuel," we can easily re-charged them again, by holding them against a neo rare-earth magnet.)

    • @ulvschmidt7174
      @ulvschmidt7174 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sure like solar panels and wind turbines?

  • @williamjames3416
    @williamjames3416 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The funny thing about perpetual motion scams is that some of them really look like could almost work. That's particularly true with the magnetic ones. If magnetic force fields could be made to act like water flowing, then they could work. We can literally feel a magnet pushing a magnet. It feels like that would be used as an energy source even though it can't. It's so counter intuitive.

  • @kenbrown2808
    @kenbrown2808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    when I was young, my parents took me to science museums. several of them had demonstration rigs that had various human powered generators connected to light bulbs. the harder the generator was cranked, the more light bulbs could be lighted up. but the commonality of all of them was how much effort it took to increase the power output. I think many "free energy by boostrapping" believers have never seen such a device.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Exploratorium in SF once had a longwire antenna, a couple hundred feet long, which would flash a single LED, blinking once every several minutes. (And so, all the "ambient RF" crackpots never actually tried to harvest atmospheric energy. It's there, and its real, and maybe it was powerful enough that it could keep a single Crookes Radiometer spinning, even when it was dark outside.)

    • @kenbrown2808
      @kenbrown2808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wbeaty you know what makes really good collectors for "free to me" energy? commercially made solar systems.

  • @pmsteamrailroading
    @pmsteamrailroading 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My wife used to work with Sullivan’s daughter. (She had great stories (like dad moving things around in the living room with magnets held to basement ceiling))

  • @InfinateIntensity
    @InfinateIntensity 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The main problem with perpetual motion is that even IF it WAS possible, it would never generate enough torque to spin a turbine generator

    • @Global-yt
      @Global-yt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I mean, even if you got just a single watt from a machine, all you need is 1 billion of them to make 1 billion watts...

    • @InfinateIntensity
      @InfinateIntensity 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Global-yt I wonder what the return on investment would be for something like that, probably a million years

    • @Global-yt
      @Global-yt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@InfinateIntensity I mean, there's a billion and a half iPhones in existence. It really isn't that hard.

  • @martinaltmann4031
    @martinaltmann4031 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recall one article in the book based on Jones' column about the use of counter sound to cancel noise, akin to modern noise cancelling headphones.

  • @The_Butler_Did_It
    @The_Butler_Did_It 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That's it! No more watching TH-cam videos on Google Chrome since they have disabled Adblock. Adverts at the start of the video I can put up with, adverts at the end of the video I can put up with. What I won't put up with is adverts in the middle of a sentence. "The metal balls barely have enough momentum to..... *_DARLIN' HOLD MY HAND, Jet2 Holidays_* ....make it up the ramp"

    • @xenomorphgourmet1005
      @xenomorphgourmet1005 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wait, ad block has been completely banned from Chrome? Damn that's... dangerous.

    • @katwitanruna
      @katwitanruna 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh look. Another reason not to use chrome. Good to know! Thanks!!

    • @genewitch
      @genewitch 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xenomorphgourmet1005 a company what makes its money from advertisers blocks advertising blockers? I'm so confused, can someone explain this to me

    • @Sphendrana
      @Sphendrana หลายเดือนก่อน

      Literally killing their own product lmao. Ad blockers are a necessity for safe browsing now, regardless of if we click ads or not. Sometimes they just pump things through our system just from being on the screen. GG Google, I'm already not using chrome anymore, or the search engine (there's less biased, corpo trashy ones out there) but now I can recommend that my friends ditch theirs for an actual laptop. Because it's only downhill from here.

  • @Observer_Effect
    @Observer_Effect 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yeah, even a magical being doing it wouldn't be "perpetual motion" - that would be external input.

  • @tsbrownie
    @tsbrownie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If you believe in the oscillating big bang, then you believe in perpetual motion. God.

    • @CountScarlioni
      @CountScarlioni 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indeed. The oscillating hypothesis basically died in 1992 with the results of the COBE mission data. WMAP and Planck have since only continued to stomp up and down on its corpse. It is odd though the sheer number of people who persist in believing the Big Crunch could be a thing.

    • @tsbrownie
      @tsbrownie หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CountScarlioni I don't know, in my life butter has been good, then bad, half a dozen times. Things change. ;)

  • @Qwerty-rx5pd
    @Qwerty-rx5pd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Build massive versions of that bird and dip the beaks in the sea, free energy for life 😂

  • @kirbywaite1586
    @kirbywaite1586 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If any machine were actually capable of perpetual motion, it would begin moving without any initial push.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If the Wright Brothers' plane was actually real, it wouldn't need to be launched using a falling-weight catapult. And industrial AC synchronous motors are an obvious hoax, since they won't start without an initial push.

  • @StationroadRatrods
    @StationroadRatrods 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember seeing a special on the discovery channel about perpetual motion machines. One guy had a crazy looking Ferris wheel type thing with water bottles hooked up to it, and it was ridiculous looking.
    One guy had a track that a metal ball rolled around on, and it had a ramp on one end. It was mounted to a huge concrete block so vibrations etc wouldn’t knock it out of phase.

  • @insanemakaioshin
    @insanemakaioshin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    1:20 - False! Nothing is impossible. We just don’t have the technology to do it yet.

    • @johnedwards2119
      @johnedwards2119 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      False! Everything is impossible.

    • @FlubberGamer
      @FlubberGamer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That’s like saying unicorns aren’t impossible, we just haven’t breed the right animals yet. It’s impossible because energy cannot be “created”(as in a system cannot create anymore energy than is already available within it). We can make things that are extremely efficient and utilize as much of the available energy within a system, but it will never create or utilize more energy than is available like what would be required for a perpetual motion machine.

    • @zedalba
      @zedalba 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Though I admire your spirit, there are many things that are categorically impossible.

    • @Dogpool
      @Dogpool 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would say from a human standpoint there is enough energy in the universe to use for whatever purpose to last forever until everybody dead. Just find a way to capture this energy and there you go. Perpetual.

    • @Sinhz-ke4fd
      @Sinhz-ke4fd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's very impossible

  • @douggiles7647
    @douggiles7647 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's said that the hardest part about building a perpetual motion machine is finding a place to hide the battery. Could be why those 2 were disappointed in the truth of how the Dreadco machine works.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've had a Dreadco machine apart (when it was at MOS in Boston, a slightly different one with big black horse-shoe magnets.) It won't run for an entire year. For the secret, think Dilbert's pointy-haired boss engineering (or perhaps Wally.) While it was there, a little kid guessed the secret, won the $1K prize.

  • @velzekt
    @velzekt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Perpetual energy from God"
    Two falsehoods in just four words.

  • @Doggy-B
    @Doggy-B 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perpetual motion is YT's autoplay feature playing Simon's greatest hits... its truly endless.

  • @TP-om8of
    @TP-om8of 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Perpetual motion is improbable but not impossible

    • @geoffreypiltz271
      @geoffreypiltz271 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It is impossible by the First Law of Thermodynamics. Read the Wikipedia article.

    • @TP-om8of
      @TP-om8of 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@geoffreypiltz271 Because Wikipedia is oh so reliable!

    • @wonderlust3054
      @wonderlust3054 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "Anything is possible," is something people tell children to get them excited about the universe. It's not actually true. Perpetual motion is only possible if you completely change foundational physics. At that point you're talking about an entirely different universe, or as many call it, "fiction."

    • @AltonV
      @AltonV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TP-om8of you can go to the sources for that Wikipedia article if you want something more reliable.
      But perpetual motion is still impossible according to the law of thermodynamics.

    • @exsandgrounder
      @exsandgrounder 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TP-om8ofIf you don't trust Wikipedia itself (although I'm not sure there's much to be gained over deliberately misleading people over the laws of thermodynamics) there's the references used to write the page, such as one written by someone at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
      Anyway, perpetual motion is impossible.

  • @lowkey213
    @lowkey213 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Fact. Magnets are SLIGHTLY more attractive than repulsive…
    An extremely accurate device built with modern materials and technology can theoretically work on earth as perpetual motion, not free energy. In space, most definitely

  • @justinwilliams7148
    @justinwilliams7148 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I remember getting a crystal radio kit as a kid and wondering how it worked without batteries. RF energy harvesting is like magic sometimes.

  • @tiffanykeefe2368
    @tiffanykeefe2368 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The drinking bird will work if you place it next to something that radiates a small amount of heat without any water. My mom was sick of dad's toy and stuck it "out of the way " , in doing so she ended up placing the lower bulb near the cooling fan of the cable box and now it works all the time without needing a top up of water

  • @josephpk4878
    @josephpk4878 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had my headphone volume cranked when this video started. Almost blew out my eardrums with the "PREVIOUSLY!!!" intro.

  • @Bucatini98
    @Bucatini98 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Since prepetrual motion doesent exist, there is no ”closer” or ”farther” from it.

  • @OliviaCynderAera
    @OliviaCynderAera 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If perpetual motion is a thing, it's probably some kind of crazy quantum phenomena. I believe maybe it could be possible, but definitely not with conventional means. I suppose in a way, the electron's orbit around an atom IS perpetual motion. At atom with an amount of energy above absolute 0 will keep motion going for a VERY long time (the heat death of the universe probably). So by all practical means, it is perpetual motion.

  • @threePwny
    @threePwny 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I contend that the only perpetual motion would be perfectly stable orbit, provided it could be isolated from the influence of the rest of the universe. But even then, it's not taking advantage of any entropy-defying miracle, it's just coasting on curved space

  • @chrisbrooks89
    @chrisbrooks89 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Heron’s fountain flows perpetually until the liquid level is too low. If it were a hermetic system it could flow forever. Boyles flask is the same principle. With a turbine inside the system we could theoretically achieve a perpetual hydropower generator.

  • @joshshoop2313
    @joshshoop2313 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The only thing perpetual about these machines are the people that think they can make one work 😂

  • @rimanLip
    @rimanLip 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Closest to perpetual motion machine you can get is flywheel on magnetic bearings in vacuum chamber.

  • @geoff2504
    @geoff2504 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Perpetually reminding us about perpetual motion machines. Do I feel a sense of Deja-vu? I seem to remember hearing about that!

  • @catkeys6911
    @catkeys6911 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You want perpetual motion? You've GOT it. The earth's spin and orbit are perpetual, for all intents and purposes. When I was a kid, me and my classmates were taken to a science center- it was so long ano I don't remember what it was, but I THINK it was the Smithsonian Institute. There was a huge pendulum (maybe 2 stories high) with a very heavy metal ball at the bottom, and this thing slowly swung back and forth and will never stop as long as Earth keeps spinning, because, due to it's length, everytime it swings one way and then back, the whole thing has also been moved in a huge circle by maybe 1 degree or so due to Earth's spin and that energy propels its next swing- so it will never stop until Earth stops spinning.

    • @J.c410
      @J.c410 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's not

  • @antivanti
    @antivanti 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could absolutely swear I saw a very similar design to that perpetual marble machine many many years before Etsy was a thing. In fact it was around 2001-2002

  • @AKAKiddo
    @AKAKiddo หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the case of the dipping bird, the water level decreasing is not an argument against perpetual motion. The power that drives this motion is the transfer of heat from the surroundings to evaporate the water on the beak. Therefore it is not a free energy system.

  • @brookekathryn1980
    @brookekathryn1980 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In high school I built what one would call or consider a perpetual motion machine. It was simply using kinetic energy to ride the razor's edge of thermodynamics thanks to some At the time very expensive ceramic bearings, whereas the 12-volt 1.2 amp brushless motor spun a 12-volt 10 amp generator right on the cusp of stalling out using a few pulleys that I made out of CDs glued together And used a drill and files to create grooves into it so that a low friction belt could rest on them To power, a tiny LED that I stuck inside of a light bulb to make it look like it was 120 volt powered.
    It would run for about 4 and 1/2 days before it would stop.
    My school was an absolute awe and I won the science fair that year even though my science teacher and I had a good laugh about it, considering everybody thought that I made a free energy machine.

  • @jefrysaxalexy-jz4nq
    @jefrysaxalexy-jz4nq หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the 90s I watched a TV program with similar goal as your video, and the most interesting case was about an old man in France, who built an enormous wheel, between 6 and 10 m I think, the wheel had spokes like bicycle wheels and on every spoke there was a plastic bottle with some mechanism inside. The mechanism consisted of weights and a spring. Ŵhen the bottle reaches the to it hits a some kind of barrier and from being tangent to the circle it straightens with the direction of the spoke. When the bottle reaches the lowest point it is hit by another barrier and returns to the 90 degree from the spoke position. Of course the principle of work was that the left side of the wheel is "havier" or probably it would be more correct to say that the left side had greater momentum because of the bigger radius . The contraption was turning aproximatelyv slowly but the inventor claimed that it has been turning the Last 20 and something years non stop. I wonder what happened with that case.

  • @bipolarminddroppings
    @bipolarminddroppings 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    11:50 Penn and Teller have been known to deliberately make the tricks they reveal more difficult and complicated than they otherwise need to just because, quite often, the way a magic trick is actually done is so mundane that revealing it just dissapoints people.
    I'm not one of those people. I can't wait to find out how that machine works, no matter how mundane.

  • @georgeindestructible
    @georgeindestructible หลายเดือนก่อน

    In reality, what most people actually do is trying to create the most efficient way possible they think they can to conserve energy as much as possible.
    That's what it boils down to because what they think they can do, is virtually impossible otherwise.

  • @veedub272
    @veedub272 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still a battery that only needs replacing every 100 years is not only an amazing achievement in itself (and could revolutionise the world) but it could sort of be looked at as an "almost" perpetual motion device in the way that it would likely last past most peoples lifetime so we would never know it stopped....

  • @theonlydinoshark9304
    @theonlydinoshark9304 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If a perpetual motion machine is created, then you wouldn't be able to hear it since that would be a loss of energy, you wouldn't be able to see it since the photons could slow it down/speed it up (loss or gain of energy), you wouldn't be able to smell it since any air it touches would slow it down, you wouldn't be able to taste it since your tongue could slow it down/speed it up (loss or gain of energy), you can't feel it for the same reason as the tongue. TLDL: If a perpetual motion machine is created you wouldn't be able to sense it in any way

    • @White_Night_Demon
      @White_Night_Demon หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then how would we know it exists?

  • @rtqii
    @rtqii 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There was a guy who had a machine that turned a large fan blade rather slowly with just a very tiny current from a 9 volt battery. The battery energized a gerbil wheel with a high voltage from a multiplier circuit and shocked their little feet into running really fast.

    • @paradiselost9946
      @paradiselost9946 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      gerbils only last for so long, and their excrement tends to accumulate.

  • @invertexyz
    @invertexyz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    11:00 What's most amazing about that wheel really is that the bearing has managed to remain working well enough to not size up under such low power conditions.

  • @LesNessman2001
    @LesNessman2001 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But you skipped the most important thing with the drinking bird!
    “Where does it get its energy when it’s running?”
    From the heat in the air! Specifically, the heat difference between the air and water. Water is ever so slightly cooler than air. Sure, it’s very inefficient, but wonderfully close to “perpetual motion” as the energy is always available!

  • @tomickes409
    @tomickes409 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A common oversight when considering the possibility of a perpetual motion machine is the need for it to operate in conditions that are virtually impossible to achieve. For such a device to work, it would require a "perfect" vacuum-completely devoid of any matter or particles. Additionally, it would need to exist at absolute zero, the theoretical temperature where all molecular motion ceases. Moreover, it couldn't be influenced by any external forces, such as gravity, sunlight, radio waves, or any form of external energy or interference.
    Beyond that, the machine couldn't rely on anything that deteriorates over time, such as batteries, chemical reactions, or nuclear decay. These materials all break down and lose efficiency, leading to inevitable energy loss. This is why perpetual motion machines are fundamentally impossible-they violate the laws of thermodynamics, especially the conservation of energy, which dictates that energy cannot be created or destroyed in an isolated system.
    Even the testing facility for a perpetual motion machine would be nearly impossible to engineer. Creating a perfectly isolated environment, completely free from external influences, and maintaining it at absolute zero is beyond our current technological capabilities. These extreme conditions underscore why the concept of perpetual motion, while intriguing, is simply unattainable in practice.