🎥 Join our TH-cam members and patrons to unlock exclusive videos via TH-cam: th-cam.com/channels/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fw.htmljoin or patreon: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal paypal.me/kingsangenerals as well!
@@williamyoung9401 I mean, yeah... He's deporting them from occupied areas, putting children in Russian families instead of giving them back to their parents, and doing "cleansing operations" in Bucha and many other places... People are making the comparisons for a good reason.
Thanks for continued coverage of the war in Ukraine, it’s much appreciated! It‘s getting harder and harder to get proper information about what‘s going on at the moment
@@cegesh1459 Russia has been (mostly) winning the war. It's just not going as quickly and decisively as it should have been due to the support Ukraine has been receiving. But the Ukrainian military can't maintain this war for much longer. They've become desperate enough that they're even recruiting middle aged men (50+) to replace those lost in battle. And with every strategic sector that Russia takes, the Ukrainian forces are further crippled. Even if they liberate the areas from Russian control (and they have in a few), those areas now have to be rebuilt, and the men/equipment lost in it's loss, along with the further losses suffered in its retaking are exhaustive. These counter-invasions into Russian territory aren't a sign of the Ukranian army moving towards victory. They're a strategic attempt to refocus the Russian Military's forces from offense to defense, to give Ukraine time to recover. It's startegically sound but also a sign of desperation. It may work but it's actually a longshot.
@@cegesh1459 many of the Russian victories of World War II were due to the British providing intelligence from enigma decrypts. In some cases the British forwarded German battle plans at the same time at the Germangenerals receive them.. Stalingrad was due to Bletchley Park
Just to put the salary of Russian soldiers into perspective it would be the same if US soldier got $100k one time payment and around $300K after one year. If he survives that is. Also if we take into consideration living costs in Russia that $400k for a year is way more than half a million so no wonder desperate people keep signing.
op just said people keep signing out of desperation. you dont have to enlist like them and gamble your life. so wheres all this hate coming from? its not like you live a life of dodging bombs and bullets. so atleast have some respect to men who are more masculine than you. without your phone shielding you from their beatings i doubt you can even mutter that garbage around them.
Your cost parity is off from what I have gathered. The Russian economy is heating up. Inflation and shortages are making things cost more, but salaries are also going up. Housing prices are going up from the bonuses! Moscow says if a soldier signs up there they will stand to make 5.2 Million Rubles total in a year. That is just 57,142$ USD at the moment as of now. Not sure if different provinces get different bonuses. From WarontheRocks of July 9. "The purchasing power parity modifier for Russia is roughly 2.2, meaning that goods and services worth $100 in the United States would cost roughly $45 in Russia." So yeah definitely not as much as you say, but at the same time it is -really- good for an average Russian in some isolated province. Edit - Wonder if they tax that. I'd be angry! A bit more than 100k is nothing to sneeze at. They are making more than gas and oil employees which I guess is a big deal. One note while trying to find the PPP of Russia conversion. The least amount paid is 14 million rubles to wounded/dead. The website says it will cost Russia at least 800 billion to 1.4 trillion just for casualties as of May. That is insane. I don't think that factors in money lost from ya know... Someone being dead and not working.
@@ballsmasher3000 Shame there isn't a new's media outlet which literally has no ego, just describes the situation as it is, as it was. Have 10 people proof read it to check for any biases and then release the news like that
I guess I’m just confused why anyone would like and agree with this comment. Anyone who thinks this is accurate either doesn’t watch mainstream media or doesn’t consume media at all. I’m someone who consumes a large variety of media on a weekly basis and Ukraine is covered literally every single day on a myriad Media outlets. For example-PBS NewsHour, CNN, Fox, BBC, German media including TWS, CBN news, CBC news, sky news, Al Jazeera, IndianTimes, the telegraph and on and on and on. Hell, the telegraph literally has an hour podcast on TH-cam exclusively detailing what happened in Ukraine in the last 24 hours. I listen to this every day and it’s extremely detailed. You can find it on TH-cam. Granted there are media outlets that are more common just on TH-cam that don’t cover the war such as the David Pakman show but channels like that typically make their money off Clicks and politics is more profitable than war. But, not only does the mainstream media cover Ukraine in great detail every day, but they don’t shy away from being impartial. Most media outlets acknowledge the facts-that a fascist authoritarian Russian dictatorship illegally invaded a sovereign democratic Ukraine. And of course, they cover news about the variety of war crimes Russia has perpetrated on Ukraine, such as the murdering of civilians, raping of women, murder and torture of Ukrainian soldier POWs, the kidnap of children who are brought back to Russia and forced into fascist indoctrination, etc. But most mainstream media has covered and is covering these issues unless you live in an autocratic nation, such as Russia, China, North Korea. Anyway, I encourage people liking this comment to watch more mainstream media, read more newspapers, listen to more mainstream media podcasts, etc. If you do this, you will notice coverage about Ukraine on a daily basis.
I guess I’m just confused why anyone would like and agree with this comment. Anyone who thinks this is accurate either doesn’t watch mainstream media or doesn’t consume media at all. I’m someone who consumes a large variety of media on a weekly basis and Ukraine is covered literally every single day on a myriad Media outlets. For example-PBS NewsHour, CNN, Fox, ABC/CBS/NBC, BBC, German media including TWS, CBN news, CBC news, sky news, Al Jazeera, IndianTimes, the telegraph and on and on and on. Hell, the telegraph literally has an hour podcast on TH-cam exclusively detailing what happened in Ukraine in the last 24 hours. I listen to this every day and it’s extremely detailed. You can find it on TH-cam. Granted there are media outlets that are more common just on TH-cam that don’t cover the war such as the David Pakman show but channels like that typically make their money off Clicks and politics is more profitable than war. But, not only does the mainstream media cover Ukraine in great detail every day, but they don’t shy away from being impartial. Most media outlets acknowledge the facts-that a fascist authoritarian Russian dictatorship illegally invaded a sovereign democratic Ukraine. And of course, they cover news about the variety of war crimes Russia has perpetrated on Ukraine, such as the murdering of civilians, raping of women, murder and torture of Ukrainian soldier POWs, the kidnap of children who are brought back to Russia and forced into fascist indoctrination, etc. But most mainstream media has covered and is covering these issues unless you live in an autocratic nation, such as Russia, China, North Korea. Anyway, I encourage people liking this comment to watch more mainstream media, read more newspapers, listen to more mainstream media podcasts, etc. If you do this, you will notice coverage about Ukraine on a daily basis.
First time watching this series.. very interesting.. impressive that you've covered the war every week since beginning of war. And quite calm in the comments as well. Keep it up
Thank you for the update on this. All I can say is what I've been saying since the beginning. To the Ukrainian people keep praying, stay strong and you will achieve your goals 👍🏻
@@ElGordoElGordito military summary channel is way more different to kings and general. Something of more regular news with a bit of conspiracy where k&g more of a news outlet. And military summary channel is more of pro Russian channel
Thank you, as always, for continuing to cover the events in Ukraine. As always, hopefully it will end soon. God be with you out there, everybody. ✝️ :)
Vatnik 07846: "Sir, the Ukrainians want to negotiate a cease fire" Putin: "Good, about they came to their senses. Tell them we'll meet in Kyiv where we'll discuss their forfeit of the city" Vatnik 07846: "Sir...they're at our front door"
it's fair to say unprovoked if Russia attacked first. If Russia wants to use grievance as excuse, then all invasions in human history can be considered "provoked".
Don't listen to those sheep. It was unprovoked. About as unprovoked as it gets. Russia was safe. Putin wanted a legacy, and that is it. Bringing back Russia to its former glory. Those people forget Ukraine were fed up of Russia trying to meddle with them. So they wanted to join up with NATO for protection, and their only mistake is they couldn't have done it fast enough.
Everytime the war starts to seem boring, something ridiculous happens (like kurks), and yes I know it's messed up to speak of the war like it's a TV show, but I can't help but be fascinated with it at times.
Could you guys upload some of the music you use in the background as separate videos without any talking in the foreground? It is insanely good music, and I'd like to hear it while doing other stuff uninterrupted by the speaking sometimes.
Boris Johnson is a Clown and a Liar - "When a Clown enters a Palace, the Palace becomes a Circus" the UK's Parliament is a Joke, I am a British citizen, our latest Government is a Farce, which is a Travesty!
I find this video interesting as it shows that the Ukrainians aren’t in the best position but as acknowledged in the title it’s a bit outdated by the Ukrainians breakthrough into Russia.
What is needed right now, more than ever is a cheaper man-portable anti-drone missile system, smaller than the Stinger system. Perhaps some kind of upgrade/modification kit for the Hydra -or the soviet equivalent rocket with a picture recognition system as guidance.
I don't think missiles would be able to manoeuvre and react in time, the only thing I've seen work reliably was catch nets and sport shooters who shoot the drones on approach. Maybe a sort of trophy system might be a better option. I saw a video of a guy who built a short range radar and gun to shoot flies in his bedroom (lol) for example
So, Isreal has produced a guidance system for small arms that supposedly gives a rifleman an 80% chance to hit a drone. The UK has just bought a batch of them, calling it the SMASH (I know…). My problem is if you can hit a surveillance drone with a rifle, it has already seen you.
@@hollyjaw3303 If you can make 10 times more during war why give a fuck? This is not even an argument bro. Every war nowadays is a war of attrition. Ukraine cannot win it without help.
@@hollyjaw3303 so Russia is only left with 30% of what she had before war? That's what you think? Are you trying to use my obvious exaggeration to sound smart? Equipment is nothing if you can keep producing it either you like it or not. For the time being Ukraine is the one that runs out of shells and manpower.
During syria Isis era fars news regularly published up to dàte defeats of isis forces. And its good to understand all points of view in current (potential escalating) war in middle east.
Next month is going to be crazy depending on how things keep going in Kursk and Belgorod. Sorry, I mean the People Republic of Kursk and Belgorod since apparently that's all the rage now. Will wait for the referendum announcing their annexation to Ukraine.
@@tavenstrickert9658 It was provoked when NATO decided to expand into Ukraine despite Russia's begging us not to do it since forever. It's not just Putin who is against this it's the whole Russian political establishment. And why? Because NATO is an existential threat. It's like Mexico having military bases of North Korea on its border with the US. And also btw, Putin did exhaust every diplomatic means of solving this issue with the Minsk Agreement and the security negotiation which Russia proposed right before the war to Biden which the West so remarkably ignored.
Ukraine had to attack this area which serves as a logistical and military training ground for an attack on their country. In this way, they also relieve the front in their country. The Ukrainians are in a difficult situation because the West did not supply them with a sufficient amount of heavy weapons either before or after the attack, there are no phantoms, Apaches, Abrahams, rifles... they still use Soviet equipment in this sense, planes, tanks, helicopters. . The Americans mostly gave them javelins, chimars and drones, but that's more for defensive use, and it's not enough for this kind of war where the Russians have especially artillery dominance.
Ukr pulled their reserves from the Donbas for this invasion, how exactly is it relieving that front!!?? Russia has reserves in Kharkov and in the mainland. This “incursion” has zero military sense other than trying to put themselves in a better negotiating position in the future, which Russia will never go for!
For those interested I recommend news sights like middle east eye, Trt news (Turkey world news) English, on Middle Eastern war I follow both sides of Iran and Israel I read Fars news English (Iran view) and times of Israel (fairly obvious) wion news (indian) world news. Saw a few people in comments saying they like this site for up to date info, recommend these and other independent journalists for those interested in world conflicts. News with non bias for either side.
You say it well, we have a hard time accepting that Russia is OK with massive losses. Losing a million or two people in a war, for their system of government thats not very high number historically or psychologically. For us even a few hundred is high (gulf war)
a lot of people fail to understand Russian mentality. They lost 27 million in WW2 (civillian and military), 2, 3 or 4 million to beat Ukraine and the west is nothing.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. One scenario... Russian divisions are pulled off the lines in the East and North to encircle Ukrainian forces as they breach further into Russia. This means relief for Ukrainian frontliners in the defensive positions. They can cycle forces in and out.
The questions in that poll (16 minute) are provocative themselves. How about questioning Ukrainians "would you prefer elimination of Russia instead of joining NATO", etc.
@@andriilink5666 I mean that they're not obvious for a reason. Everyone knows they would rather keep their territory intact etc., but in case that's not an option it's good to know what the people think. What would be their preferred second best or third best outcome? It's not guaranteed Ukraine will get its territory back, and it's important to know what the people will or won't support. It's a democracy, after all.
@@mokarokas-1727 Russia could've been eliminated as a state a week ago. A month ago. A year ago. The roads to Moscow are still empty of any battleworthy detachments and have no defensive lines / mine fields. So why do you think "an option" in the poll should only be the variants favourable for Kremlin?
@@andriilink5666 Oh, you think it's that easy? lol, get outta here. And I already answered that exact question in the comment you just replied to. What are you even getting at?
JD Vance was an outspoken critic of Russia. If I was Russia, I woulkd not worry about it. JD Vance was also an outspoken critic of Trump and look where he is now, praising the alleged virtue of Trump and his policy.
_Nobody_ wants any expansion of Moscow's influence. The problem non-Leftists have with the Democrats is the latter's paradoxical position of the US being obligated to support Ukraine _from a position of ever-worsening weakness_ . The US already has to delay delivery and even claw back export approvals from "less-important allies" in order to keep up with the demands of the war in Ukraine even before Hamas decided to attack Israel.
I would even add to the previous comment that, where it was indeed completed, it did function as intended, some blokhaus surrendering weeks after the french reddition. also, the maginot line was in the alps too, where the italians did not pass, and where either defeated or stopped.
That defensive line did its job. Well, the problem was it was enveloped because Belgium was quickly conquered and before the war, it got angry whenever France proposed fortifying their shared border
@@christianweibrecht6555 You have that backwards, the French charged into Belgium thinking the fight would be in Belgium. Instead the Germans attacked through the Ardennes forest and hit the Maginot Line at Sedan, which was 6 months behind in the construction of its ouvrages due to the ineptitude of Charles Huntziger. The French did not hurriedly remove it's forces from Belgium which resulted them getting cut off and being forced into the Dunkirk evacuation.
@@Edax_Royeaux I’m gonna gaslight you and claim that was originally thought of. That the tactics initially working but having an exterior flaw/weakness (Belgium and Kursk) happening :)
In the short term, yes. In the long term, it is unsustainable. Russia doesn't have enough people to sustain its current economy. In the 90s, this was compounded by the fact that the veterans from Afghanistan and then Chechnya started banding up and became a criminal menace. Let's just say, there will be way more veterans and disabled from this war than there were from Afghanistan+2 Chechen wars.
@@KingsandGenerals no mocking or prejudice here. I see that wikipedia gives both (New York or Niu-York), so this is probably a question to wiki. In ukrainian language, it is actually spelled and pronounced same as US major city. I'm from Ukraine and I love watching your videos. Thanks for doing a great job!
That's not a rosy picture for Ukraine overall but glad to see Ukraine liberating part of Russia! Again we have been shown how useless the UN is in obvious attacks into sovereign pre 2014 Ukraine.
As a big fan and committed viewer, I strongly urge Kings and Generals to maintain their elite status as a history and global affairs channel by pursuing an objective line of reporting on global affairs.
Thank you for monitoring the situation with the unprovoked russian invasion of Ukraine and for sharing objective updates regarding the current events. This is very valuable.
This is perhaps the most unbias channel, besides task & purpose, that provides good information on this conflict. Other channels like Denys Davydov and Arthur Rhei seem to only provide 1 sided accounts and are pretty much proganda channels. I had no idea it was this bad that Ukraine was struggling so hard on their other fronts before watching this. Good job Kings and Generals. I appreciate your hard work!
That attack on Kursk is just a double edged sword. Ukraine could use it to negotiate if they hold the territory down for a while but i doubt Putin would want to negotiate after that, but there's a big chance Putin might use the attack on Kursk as a reason to open up another front, whatever front he'll open who knows...
its just a advance with no real motives tho. ukraine should'nt expect to be captruring kursk. the situation is dire in areas like chasiv yar and advika sectors. russian advances are slow but steady. most of these can be stopped with manpower and focused firepower. this advance goes against it as its another front Ukraine has to put its resources on. this does have some benefits for ukraine tho. it boosts some morale and can satisfy west to send more equipment as well as providing leverage in a peace conference. not to forget damaging russian population's morale.
@@danishkfd If Russia is leaving it's borders completely undefended in order to advance in Advikia, it means Russia doesn't have the manpower to both advance in Advikia and protect the border, so it makes sense to force the Russias to redistribute their manpower to the border so it can no longer conduct meaningful offensives.
Thank you for this video. It would be interesting to illustrate the principle of indirect approach, impeccably implemented by the Ukrainians and extensively studied by Liddel Hart.
Very informative. I figure the Russian gains in this episode were because the UAF was husbanding the men and material required for their Kursk offensive.
Opinion on Kursk offensive. its just a advance with no real motives tho. Ukraine shouldn't expect to be capturing Kursk. the situation is dire in areas like Chasiv yar and Advika sectors. Russian advances are slow but steady. most of these can be stopped with manpower and focused firepower. this advance goes against it as its another front Ukraine has to put its resources on. this does have some benefits for Ukraine tho. it boosts some morale and can satisfy west to send more equipment as well as providing leverage in a peace conference. not to forget damaging Russian population's morale.
If Russia is leaving it's borders completely undefended in order to advance in Advikia, it means Russia doesn't have the manpower to both advance in Advikia and protect the border, so it makes sense to force the Russias to redistribute their manpower to the border so it can no longer conduct meaningful offensives.
Early notable benefits from the Kursk offensive 1) Scores of POWs for exchange. Many of those are conscripts and some of those conscripts will have influential or active parents 2) Disrupting rail line that was used to supply stuff from Belarus to the frontlines, including fuel from Mozyr. It will stay this until Sudzha is recaptured 3) Forcing Russia to frantically move some reserves there, easing the situation on other fronts. 4) Saving some Ukrainians settlements from bombs and missiles that will now fall on Russian settlements instead 5) Getting world media attention back. 6) Yes, it is a huge morale booster for Ukrainian troops fighting defensive battles elsewhere
@@Edax_Royeauxit was a massive L for Putin tbh, but he's consistently underestimated Ukraine's propensity to continue the fight. I'd have thought he would take the gloves off after the first push on Kiev, when it became clear Ukr wasn't going to be scared into a quick and easy capitulation, but here we are years later watching him still make these mistakes
@@ElGordoElGordito In the final years of WWI, many German generals were already convinced of their defeat on the Western Front, but due to the political situation, they went along with the doomed offensives anyway that accomplished little other than to nudge the frontline. The logical thing to have done was to retreat back to the German border and from there attempt a ceasefire, but millions of Germans died for a handful of kilometers of French land and thus it would have been political suicide to retreat and have it all been for nothing. I think Putin is stuck in the same situation.
2020: Russia may be the second strongest army in the world 2022: Russia might be the second strongest army in Ukraine 2024: Russia is now the second strongest army in Russia
@@ShadowOfThePit did you know that around 1/4 Russians do not have indoor plumbing, if you want jokes, you don't need to look any farther than Russia, the whole thing is a joke.
To which date are you referring to at the start of video vovchansk completely fell in July and they are advancing in Kharkiv direction, please check the latest sources and if the video is with respect to old incidents then it's okay.
Several units have social media (for example, Azov and the 3rd Assault brigade both have youtube channels where they post-combat footage) or the soldiers in each unit have social media and mention the area of the front they are in. That being said not every unit has its exact location known at every moment so I wouldn't be surprised if the unit icons you see in the video are a rough guess based on people and equipment seen operating on that part of the front. As for plans, it's mostly guesses about what people see happening and what soldiers on the ground are saying about how they are being attacked.
A compromise could be eastern Ukrainian land broken off to form separate country. Of course this is if Ukrain cannot reclaim any lost land at all militarily.
@@nomooon It doesn't matter either way, unfortunately. It's all too clear that Russia will just attack again to take the territory, when they're better prepared.
Thank you for making these videos, they're very informative. It will take a long time before historians can accurately chronicle how everything happened, but articles and content like this will have to do for now. I hope you can parse through the propaganda.
The preface of "unprovoked invasion" please needs to stop. Anyone who knows geopolitics in any depth knows this is untrue. You can argue and debate that it is indeed unjustified, and I tend to agree, but that is not what unprovoked means.
Multiple accounts who have never commented on this channels videos, are making the same claim This channel made a video explaining why Russia’s invasion was unprovoked
🎥 Join our TH-cam members and patrons to unlock exclusive videos via TH-cam: th-cam.com/channels/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fw.htmljoin or patreon: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal paypal.me/kingsangenerals as well!
What are the names of the songs that you've used on your videos for these updates? I've tried to find them but have been unsuccessful.
@@wookieboss2643 How is saying an unprovoked invasion is unprovoked "misleading"?
Make series on HOTAK empire
Putin wants a "Final Solution" to the Ukrainian question? 🤯 😵💫
@@williamyoung9401 I mean, yeah... He's deporting them from occupied areas, putting children in Russian families instead of giving them back to their parents, and doing "cleansing operations" in Bucha and many other places... People are making the comparisons for a good reason.
"Russians also gained ground on Niu-York"
me listening with the video on the background: WHAT???
They also made progress in a city called progress. Niu York was funny though.
Wake UP We are in COD VeRSE Now Lol.
Moscow On The Hudson. 😅
Yeah they took Coney Island decades ago
Hard same
We got invasion of russia before gta 6
Overused joke
@@squidward1839this joke became overused before gta6
Easy to say after the invasion...
I don't hold out much hope for GTA VI. It's not the same Rockstar we grew up with.
Before eu5
Thanks for continued coverage of the war in Ukraine, it’s much appreciated! It‘s getting harder and harder to get proper information about what‘s going on at the moment
Yup !
Putin: “Alright, it was scary at first but we finally have things under control.”
Advisor: “Sir, the Ukrainians are invading Kursk.”
Putin realizing he can recreate one of the most important battles in ww2
@@DaleGaming-f3q But with no chance for Putin to win.
@@cegesh1459 Russia has been (mostly) winning the war. It's just not going as quickly and decisively as it should have been due to the support Ukraine has been receiving.
But the Ukrainian military can't maintain this war for much longer.
They've become desperate enough that they're even recruiting middle aged men (50+) to replace those lost in battle.
And with every strategic sector that Russia takes, the Ukrainian forces are further crippled.
Even if they liberate the areas from Russian control (and they have in a few), those areas now have to be rebuilt, and the men/equipment lost in it's loss, along with the further losses suffered in its retaking are exhaustive.
These counter-invasions into Russian territory aren't a sign of the Ukranian army moving towards victory.
They're a strategic attempt to refocus the Russian Military's forces from offense to defense, to give Ukraine time to recover. It's startegically sound but also a sign of desperation.
It may work but it's actually a longshot.
@@mr.l8527what do you call a win? Losing shit ton of people and equipment? Then yeah Russia is winning
@@cegesh1459 many of the Russian victories of World War II were due to the British providing intelligence from enigma decrypts. In some cases the British forwarded German battle plans at the same time at the Germangenerals receive them.. Stalingrad was due to Bletchley Park
Just to put the salary of Russian soldiers into perspective it would be the same if US soldier got $100k one time payment and around $300K after one year. If he survives that is. Also if we take into consideration living costs in Russia that $400k for a year is way more than half a million so no wonder desperate people keep signing.
How many of them are central asian migrants?
And how many of them actually survive that first year.
"Your on your 11th month soldier off to the meat grinder you go"
op just said people keep signing out of desperation. you dont have to enlist like them and gamble your life. so wheres all this hate coming from? its not like you live a life of dodging bombs and bullets. so atleast have some respect to men who are more masculine than you. without your phone shielding you from their beatings i doubt you can even mutter that garbage around them.
Lol, I personally know so many volunteers who sign up bc of political and patriotic reasons, so stop pushing this agenda about "pOoR pEoPle"....
Your cost parity is off from what I have gathered.
The Russian economy is heating up. Inflation and shortages are making things cost more, but salaries are also going up. Housing prices are going up from the bonuses!
Moscow says if a soldier signs up there they will stand to make 5.2 Million Rubles total in a year. That is just 57,142$ USD at the moment as of now.
Not sure if different provinces get different bonuses.
From WarontheRocks of July 9. "The purchasing power parity modifier for Russia is roughly 2.2, meaning that goods and services worth $100 in the United States would cost roughly $45 in Russia."
So yeah definitely not as much as you say, but at the same time it is -really- good for an average Russian in some isolated province. Edit - Wonder if they tax that. I'd be angry! A bit more than 100k is nothing to sneeze at.
They are making more than gas and oil employees which I guess is a big deal.
One note while trying to find the PPP of Russia conversion.
The least amount paid is 14 million rubles to wounded/dead. The website says it will cost Russia at least 800 billion to 1.4 trillion just for casualties as of May.
That is insane. I don't think that factors in money lost from ya know... Someone being dead and not working.
Cheers for K&G’s continued coverage of this conflict where mainstream media has continually failed to provide any proper info.
The mainstream media is tired of covering this long war. The public is also less interested in this affair.
@@chaimcohen8068no one will get tired of proper information.
People gets tired of interpretations of mainstream media about it.
@@ballsmasher3000 Shame there isn't a new's media outlet which literally has no ego, just describes the situation as it is, as it was.
Have 10 people proof read it to check for any biases and then release the news like that
I guess I’m just confused why anyone would like and agree with this comment. Anyone who thinks this is accurate either doesn’t watch mainstream media or doesn’t consume media at all. I’m someone who consumes a large variety of media on a weekly basis and Ukraine is covered literally every single day on a myriad Media outlets.
For example-PBS NewsHour, CNN, Fox, BBC, German media including TWS, CBN news, CBC news, sky news, Al Jazeera, IndianTimes, the telegraph and on and on and on. Hell, the telegraph literally has an hour podcast on TH-cam exclusively detailing what happened in Ukraine in the last 24 hours. I listen to this every day and it’s extremely detailed. You can find it on TH-cam.
Granted there are media outlets that are more common just on TH-cam that don’t cover the war such as the David Pakman show but channels like that typically make their money off Clicks and politics is more profitable than war.
But, not only does the mainstream media cover Ukraine in great detail every day, but they don’t shy away from being impartial. Most media outlets acknowledge the facts-that a fascist authoritarian Russian dictatorship illegally invaded a sovereign democratic Ukraine. And of course, they cover news about the variety of war crimes Russia has perpetrated on Ukraine, such as the murdering of civilians, raping of women, murder and torture of Ukrainian soldier POWs, the kidnap of children who are brought back to Russia and forced into fascist indoctrination, etc. But most mainstream media has covered and is covering these issues unless you live in an autocratic nation, such as Russia, China, North Korea.
Anyway, I encourage people liking this comment to watch more mainstream media, read more newspapers, listen to more mainstream media podcasts, etc. If you do this, you will notice coverage about Ukraine on a daily basis.
I guess I’m just confused why anyone would like and agree with this comment. Anyone who thinks this is accurate either doesn’t watch mainstream media or doesn’t consume media at all. I’m someone who consumes a large variety of media on a weekly basis and Ukraine is covered literally every single day on a myriad Media outlets.
For example-PBS NewsHour, CNN, Fox, ABC/CBS/NBC, BBC, German media including TWS, CBN news, CBC news, sky news, Al Jazeera, IndianTimes, the telegraph and on and on and on. Hell, the telegraph literally has an hour podcast on TH-cam exclusively detailing what happened in Ukraine in the last 24 hours. I listen to this every day and it’s extremely detailed. You can find it on TH-cam.
Granted there are media outlets that are more common just on TH-cam that don’t cover the war such as the David Pakman show but channels like that typically make their money off Clicks and politics is more profitable than war.
But, not only does the mainstream media cover Ukraine in great detail every day, but they don’t shy away from being impartial. Most media outlets acknowledge the facts-that a fascist authoritarian Russian dictatorship illegally invaded a sovereign democratic Ukraine. And of course, they cover news about the variety of war crimes Russia has perpetrated on Ukraine, such as the murdering of civilians, raping of women, murder and torture of Ukrainian soldier POWs, the kidnap of children who are brought back to Russia and forced into fascist indoctrination, etc. But most mainstream media has covered and is covering these issues unless you live in an autocratic nation, such as Russia, China, North Korea.
Anyway, I encourage people liking this comment to watch more mainstream media, read more newspapers, listen to more mainstream media podcasts, etc. If you do this, you will notice coverage about Ukraine on a daily basis.
At this point they are my go to source of information on Ukraine war. Keep on going!
This channel and "Task and Purpose" do the best job.
@quibblequois2436 yep.
I'd recommend perun. Not all videos are about ukraine. But those that are, are really good and informative.
Military Summary Channel
Then you must not know The Enforcer
I love this channel so much. I wish there was one identical to this in format which covered elections in all countries and economy
Very interesting to see how the status quo changes next video.
Thank you for continuing to report on this!
Thanks for watching!
3:25 'Since then the Russians have gained ground in New York'
wow I was not expecting that
The next few updates should be quite interesting.
Thanks for keeping doing these !
Thanks for watching!
First time watching this series.. very interesting.. impressive that you've covered the war every week since beginning of war. And quite calm in the comments as well. Keep it up
Next video is gonna be bonkers with what is going on in Kursk Oblast.
Thank you for the unbias update every month!
Thank you!
I'm really REALLY looking forward to next episode
Thank you for the update on this. All I can say is what I've been saying since the beginning. To the Ukrainian people keep praying, stay strong and you will achieve your goals 👍🏻
At last. I've been waiting for K&G to update cause its the only channel that clearly shows the overall picture of the conflict. Thanks!
Try DPA and Military Summary, 1st is a Singaporean source and 2nd is Russian
@@ElGordoElGordito looks like military summary is Belarusian channel
@@ElGordoElGordito military summary channel is way more different to kings and general. Something of more regular news with a bit of conspiracy where k&g more of a news outlet. And military summary channel is more of pro Russian channel
Thank you, as always, for continuing to cover the events in Ukraine. As always, hopefully it will end soon.
God be with you out there, everybody. ✝️ :)
Vatnik 07846: "Sir, the Ukrainians want to negotiate a cease fire"
Putin: "Good, about they came to their senses. Tell them we'll meet in Kyiv where we'll discuss their forfeit of the city"
Vatnik 07846: "Sir...they're at our front door"
Ukrainians arent Wagner tho
To all those saying "unprovoked??!": yes, K&G is pro-ukrainian but their coverage of the war itself is fair, not really biased.
Yeah, Russia was "provoked" into invading Ukraine in the same way a man is provoked into raping a woman because she was wearing revealing clothing.
it's fair to say unprovoked if Russia attacked first. If Russia wants to use grievance as excuse, then all invasions in human history can be considered "provoked".
@@nomooon i know, i was focusing on what everybody is here for though: coverage of the war
The actual coverage is obviously biased in favor of Ukraine.
Don't listen to those sheep.
It was unprovoked. About as unprovoked as it gets. Russia was safe.
Putin wanted a legacy, and that is it. Bringing back Russia to its former glory.
Those people forget Ukraine were fed up of Russia trying to meddle with them. So they wanted to join up with NATO for protection, and their only mistake is they couldn't have done it fast enough.
Everytime the war starts to seem boring, something ridiculous happens (like kurks), and yes I know it's messed up to speak of the war like it's a TV show, but I can't help but be fascinated with it at times.
Could you guys upload some of the music you use in the background as separate videos without any talking in the foreground? It is insanely good music, and I'd like to hear it while doing other stuff uninterrupted by the speaking sometimes.
I know the ending theme is "Heroes Will Fall" by Bonnie Grace. It can be found here on YT. I had to look it up myself, for the same reason as you 😊
"The Russians made progress in Niu-York"
Me and American: *Coughs up my soda, What?!?!!?!?!
boris johnson, world renowned genius..
You owe me a new sarcasm meter.
@@andrewharrison8436 i broke it? sincerest apologies...
@@rep1600 accepted - it has been under a lot of strain recently.
Boris Johnson is a Clown and a Liar - "When a Clown enters a Palace, the Palace becomes a Circus" the UK's Parliament is a Joke, I am a British citizen, our latest Government is a Farce, which is a Travesty!
Credit to the Russians for managing to adjust their tactics instead of sticking to old, outdated ideologies.
I find this video interesting as it shows that the Ukrainians aren’t in the best position but as acknowledged in the title it’s a bit outdated by the Ukrainians breakthrough into Russia.
The russian have gained ground around New York 🌝
The Russians have gained ground around New York 🌚
Thanks for the overview and update.
What is needed right now, more than ever is a cheaper man-portable anti-drone missile system, smaller than the Stinger system. Perhaps some kind of upgrade/modification kit for the Hydra -or the soviet equivalent rocket with a picture recognition system as guidance.
You can bet every developed nation is whipping their R&D department for a wide range drone signal disruption system.
I don't think missiles would be able to manoeuvre and react in time, the only thing I've seen work reliably was catch nets and sport shooters who shoot the drones on approach.
Maybe a sort of trophy system might be a better option. I saw a video of a guy who built a short range radar and gun to shoot flies in his bedroom (lol) for example
So, Isreal has produced a guidance system for small arms that supposedly gives a rifleman an 80% chance to hit a drone. The UK has just bought a batch of them, calling it the SMASH (I know…).
My problem is if you can hit a surveillance drone with a rifle, it has already seen you.
Missile would always be more expensive than drones by a factor of ten. So it would never work.
@@shwetapatwa1327 With that firm statement Id like to see you write up a spreadsheet how that would work.
russia: new meta tactics brrr
ukraine: activate p2w
russia: gawddamit
meta tactics is losing 70% of you pre war equipment? lol
@@hollyjaw3303 If you can make 10 times more during war why give a fuck? This is not even an argument bro. Every war nowadays is a war of attrition. Ukraine cannot win it without help.
@@pasxalisdoboudis2714 the point is: Russia cannot make 10 times more and it's not doing it.
@@hollyjaw3303 so Russia is only left with 30% of what she had before war? That's what you think? Are you trying to use my obvious exaggeration to sound smart? Equipment is nothing if you can keep producing it either you like it or not. For the time being Ukraine is the one that runs out of shells and manpower.
@@pasxalisdoboudis2714the problem is that they can’t make 10 times more. They don’t make enough to cover their losses.
Thank you so much for continuing to cover this conflict so thoroughly. Praying for the whole situation.
During syria Isis era fars news regularly published up to dàte defeats of isis forces. And its good to understand all points of view in current (potential escalating) war in middle east.
They use Fiber-optic FPV drones, now. Noted by a steady framerate of around 60 in videos.
Great content
Niu-York is a rural settlement in Toretsk urban hromada, Bakhmut Raion, Donetsk Oblast
Rural? Lol.okay
Next month is going to be crazy depending on how things keep going in Kursk and Belgorod. Sorry, I mean the People Republic of Kursk and Belgorod since apparently that's all the rage now. Will wait for the referendum announcing their annexation to Ukraine.
Unlike with Russia in Donetsk and Lugansk, Ukraine is not going into Kursk and Belgorod on the basis of the population's sentiment
Unprovoked?
Yes
No. Provoked
Nothing, by definition, is unprovoked. Learn words
How about this? You tell me how it was provoked
@@tavenstrickert9658 It was provoked when NATO decided to expand into Ukraine despite Russia's begging us not to do it since forever. It's not just Putin who is against this it's the whole Russian political establishment. And why? Because NATO is an existential threat. It's like Mexico having military bases of North Korea on its border with the US. And also btw, Putin did exhaust every diplomatic means of solving this issue with the Minsk Agreement and the security negotiation which Russia proposed right before the war to Biden which the West so remarkably ignored.
Ukraine had to attack this area which serves as a logistical and military training ground for an attack on their country. In this way, they also relieve the front in their country. The Ukrainians are in a difficult situation because the West did not supply them with a sufficient amount of heavy weapons either before or after the attack, there are no phantoms, Apaches, Abrahams, rifles... they still use Soviet equipment in this sense, planes, tanks, helicopters. . The Americans mostly gave them javelins, chimars and drones, but that's more for defensive use, and it's not enough for this kind of war where the Russians have especially artillery dominance.
Ukr pulled their reserves from the Donbas for this invasion, how exactly is it relieving that front!!??
Russia has reserves in Kharkov and in the mainland. This “incursion” has zero military sense other than trying to put themselves in a better negotiating position in the future, which Russia will never go for!
And dude did you forget about Atacms/m777/himars/Tanks you gonna call those defensive weapons too?? Keep coping bro 😂😂
@@dimsb5901 30 tanks really gonna make the difference fr fr
@@Sinaeb let’s not forget all the Soviet era tanks that were donated to Ukraine by Nstos Eastern European satellites states!!
For those interested I recommend news sights like middle east eye, Trt news (Turkey world news) English, on Middle Eastern war I follow both sides of Iran and Israel I read Fars news English (Iran view) and times of Israel (fairly obvious) wion news (indian) world news. Saw a few people in comments saying they like this site for up to date info, recommend these and other independent journalists for those interested in world conflicts. News with non bias for either side.
Thank you for being unbiased its really hard to find stuff like this especially with people saying stuff like "Russian lines collapsing now🤯"
Russian here, dont worry, Dmitrii Medvedev is a clown for us too
DIMON!!!!
K&G: makes a video about the latest developments in Ukraine war
Ukraine: invades Kursk
K&G: am I a joke to you?
I swear this is my favorite history/current events channel, thanks for another great video. Can’t wait to see the one about Kursk😉
I do hope you're paying your violinists well
Map software is amazing
"All that blood for a drop of land" - Thanos
I'm not the only one that caught what was written but left unsaid @ 17:36, right?
Nice
The go to channel for information on the Ukraine conflit!!!
You say it well, we have a hard time accepting that Russia is OK with massive losses. Losing a million or two people in a war, for their system of government thats not very high number historically or psychologically. For us even a few hundred is high (gulf war)
a lot of people fail to understand Russian mentality. They lost 27 million in WW2 (civillian and military), 2, 3 or 4 million to beat Ukraine and the west is nothing.
Then why they don't have troops to stop Kursk invasion?
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
One scenario... Russian divisions are pulled off the lines in the East and North to encircle Ukrainian forces as they breach further into Russia.
This means relief for Ukrainian frontliners in the defensive positions. They can cycle forces in and out.
That statment of JD Vance is idiocracy, dude has no idea what's going on in the world and thus doesn't care about anything outside his own borders.
dude your ukraine playlist is not in order. Its so hard to follow an exact chronological event
The questions in that poll (16 minute) are provocative themselves. How about questioning Ukrainians "would you prefer elimination of Russia instead of joining NATO", etc.
Well, polls are meant to get answers to questions that are NOT obvious, so...
@@mokarokas-1727 Those questions are not obvious, they are directly suggestive.
@@andriilink5666 I mean that they're not obvious for a reason. Everyone knows they would rather keep their territory intact etc., but in case that's not an option it's good to know what the people think. What would be their preferred second best or third best outcome? It's not guaranteed Ukraine will get its territory back, and it's important to know what the people will or won't support. It's a democracy, after all.
@@mokarokas-1727 Russia could've been eliminated as a state a week ago. A month ago. A year ago. The roads to Moscow are still empty of any battleworthy detachments and have no defensive lines / mine fields. So why do you think "an option" in the poll should only be the variants favourable for Kremlin?
@@andriilink5666 Oh, you think it's that easy? lol, get outta here. And I already answered that exact question in the comment you just replied to. What are you even getting at?
JD Vance was an outspoken critic of Russia. If I was Russia, I woulkd not worry about it. JD Vance was also an outspoken critic of Trump and look where he is now, praising the alleged virtue of Trump and his policy.
that's what most American politicians do.
Both side in US politic IS hypocrit. Remember when Obama making fun of Biden dementia, yet endorse him for presidential twice?
Vance will pick whatever side lets him keep his job
_Nobody_ wants any expansion of Moscow's influence. The problem non-Leftists have with the Democrats is the latter's paradoxical position of the US being obligated to support Ukraine _from a position of ever-worsening weakness_ . The US already has to delay delivery and even claw back export approvals from "less-important allies" in order to keep up with the demands of the war in Ukraine even before Hamas decided to attack Israel.
Maybe you meant showing Kyiv on graphics during 10:00 but it is Cherkasy shown xD
Was waiting for the next episode in the series, I hope we won't end at a cliffhanger
That’s foul😂
yes, Ukrainians are now looking at the Belarusian border, which is why Belarusians are worried and on high alert.
The tactics being outdated by the Kursk offensive is like the French going "Hah! You'll never go past the Maginot line!" in 1939
The French never assumed that, the Maginot Line was unfinished even by 1940.
I would even add to the previous comment that, where it was indeed completed, it did function as intended, some blokhaus surrendering weeks after the french reddition.
also, the maginot line was in the alps too, where the italians did not pass, and where either defeated or stopped.
That defensive line did its job. Well, the problem was it was enveloped because Belgium was quickly conquered and before the war, it got angry whenever France proposed fortifying their shared border
@@christianweibrecht6555 You have that backwards, the French charged into Belgium thinking the fight would be in Belgium. Instead the Germans attacked through the Ardennes forest and hit the Maginot Line at Sedan, which was 6 months behind in the construction of its ouvrages due to the ineptitude of Charles Huntziger. The French did not hurriedly remove it's forces from Belgium which resulted them getting cut off and being forced into the Dunkirk evacuation.
@@Edax_Royeaux I’m gonna gaslight you and claim that was originally thought of. That the tactics initially working but having an exterior flaw/weakness (Belgium and Kursk) happening :)
Realistically, do Russian government has enough to pay for the surviving soldiers after the war?
In the short term, yes. In the long term, it is unsustainable. Russia doesn't have enough people to sustain its current economy. In the 90s, this was compounded by the fact that the veterans from Afghanistan and then Chechnya started banding up and became a criminal menace. Let's just say, there will be way more veterans and disabled from this war than there were from Afghanistan+2 Chechen wars.
The long term economic prospects for Russia are dismal and getting worse - that, unfortunately, doesn't seem to be about to help Ukraine.
Watching these videos makes me very grateful to live in the United States.
very funny how you try to veil the name of village called New York, by naming it Niu York
That is how Ukrainians are calling it.
@@KingsandGenerals no mocking or prejudice here. I see that wikipedia gives both (New York or Niu-York), so this is probably a question to wiki. In ukrainian language, it is actually spelled and pronounced same as US major city. I'm from Ukraine and I love watching your videos. Thanks for doing a great job!
Thanks for the second video 😮😮😮
Possibly the Chechens have joined in now.. not long ago I saw a video of putin in chè chechnia looks like new units hence new tactics
That's not a rosy picture for Ukraine overall but glad to see Ukraine liberating part of Russia! Again we have been shown how useless the UN is in obvious attacks into sovereign pre 2014 Ukraine.
"How to become a strategic/tactical mastermind" by Volodymyr Zelenskyy
This is the only channel which honestly describes the military situation
At this very moment the Ukrainians gained experience on modern warfare can train NATO soldiers...
As a big fan and committed viewer, I strongly urge Kings and Generals to maintain their elite status as a history and global affairs channel by pursuing an objective line of reporting on global affairs.
Cool
Once I realize it's been a month since the last Ukraine update, I start checking this channel daily until it pops up haha always a great watch.
Not having Logic as a core value, you are doomed to failure.
What the background music playing at 19:16?
was LF soundtrack since Israel Arawb War 1948 if you find it out, please tell me :D
Perhaps it's better to take the deal that was offered.
Thank you for monitoring the situation with the unprovoked russian invasion of Ukraine and for sharing objective updates regarding the current events. This is very valuable.
This is perhaps the most unbias channel, besides task & purpose, that provides good information on this conflict. Other channels like Denys Davydov and Arthur Rhei seem to only provide 1 sided accounts and are pretty much proganda channels.
I had no idea it was this bad that Ukraine was struggling so hard on their other fronts before watching this. Good job Kings and Generals. I appreciate your hard work!
That attack on Kursk is just a double edged sword. Ukraine could use it to negotiate if they hold the territory down for a while but i doubt Putin would want to negotiate after that, but there's a big chance Putin might use the attack on Kursk as a reason to open up another front, whatever front he'll open who knows...
its just a advance with no real motives tho. ukraine should'nt expect to be captruring kursk. the situation is dire in areas like chasiv yar and advika sectors. russian advances are slow but steady. most of these can be stopped with manpower and focused firepower. this advance goes against it as its another front Ukraine has to put its resources on. this does have some benefits for ukraine tho. it boosts some morale and can satisfy west to send more equipment as well as providing leverage in a peace conference. not to forget damaging russian population's morale.
@@danishkfd If Russia is leaving it's borders completely undefended in order to advance in Advikia, it means Russia doesn't have the manpower to both advance in Advikia and protect the border, so it makes sense to force the Russias to redistribute their manpower to the border so it can no longer conduct meaningful offensives.
The thing is, ukraine is pushing this advance with minimal manpower, winter and fall is coming, which puts russia in a scary spot. @@danishkfd
You will not make videos about Palestine and Israel ??
they did
Thank you for this video. It would be interesting to illustrate the principle of indirect approach, impeccably implemented by the Ukrainians and extensively studied by Liddel Hart.
Excellent content as always,
Out only source of reliable information.
Keep up the good work man
Old quid pro coup admitted that he talked about Putin’s “dream” of taking Ukraine.
17:31 You mean 2022.. RIGHT??!
We now know that part of Ukraine's 30,000 new hires went north to Russia.
Very informative. I figure the Russian gains in this episode were because the UAF was husbanding the men and material required for their Kursk offensive.
Kursk is a single brigade
Kursk is a single brigade
@@atomica0914well there is supply units so probably up to 2-3(also,required rotation). More reasonable to assume amount of vechicles used
Watching this video and realizing that people are dying I just opened up a cold bottle of Heineken. What a contrast!
Where did you get the music, that plays when you talk about patreon?
It's a free sample on a loop.
Opinion on Kursk offensive. its just a advance with no real motives tho. Ukraine shouldn't expect to be capturing Kursk. the situation is dire in areas like Chasiv yar and Advika sectors. Russian advances are slow but steady. most of these can be stopped with manpower and focused firepower. this advance goes against it as its another front Ukraine has to put its resources on. this does have some benefits for Ukraine tho. it boosts some morale and can satisfy west to send more equipment as well as providing leverage in a peace conference. not to forget damaging Russian population's morale.
If Russia is leaving it's borders completely undefended in order to advance in Advikia, it means Russia doesn't have the manpower to both advance in Advikia and protect the border, so it makes sense to force the Russias to redistribute their manpower to the border so it can no longer conduct meaningful offensives.
Early notable benefits from the Kursk offensive
1) Scores of POWs for exchange. Many of those are conscripts and some of those conscripts will have influential or active parents
2) Disrupting rail line that was used to supply stuff from Belarus to the frontlines, including fuel from Mozyr. It will stay this until Sudzha is recaptured
3) Forcing Russia to frantically move some reserves there, easing the situation on other fronts.
4) Saving some Ukrainians settlements from bombs and missiles that will now fall on Russian settlements instead
5) Getting world media attention back.
6) Yes, it is a huge morale booster for Ukrainian troops fighting defensive battles elsewhere
@@Edax_Royeauxit was a massive L for Putin tbh, but he's consistently underestimated Ukraine's propensity to continue the fight.
I'd have thought he would take the gloves off after the first push on Kiev, when it became clear Ukr wasn't going to be scared into a quick and easy capitulation, but here we are years later watching him still make these mistakes
@@ElGordoElGordito In the final years of WWI, many German generals were already convinced of their defeat on the Western Front, but due to the political situation, they went along with the doomed offensives anyway that accomplished little other than to nudge the frontline. The logical thing to have done was to retreat back to the German border and from there attempt a ceasefire, but millions of Germans died for a handful of kilometers of French land and thus it would have been political suicide to retreat and have it all been for nothing.
I think Putin is stuck in the same situation.
@Edax_Royeaux uh you mean zelensky right???? Smfh you really are brainwashed
This is the only new source I trust
Did he actually start by saying unprovoked 😅
Hahahahha. Yes, he did. Not being a brainlet is really helpful. More people should try it.
Ukraine: "Call an ambulance.... BUT NOT FOR ME"
Thank you for the Video
is there a sound problem or it is at my side?
Looks good to me. What is the problem?
@@KingsandGenerals i found few times that the sound is distorted
works for me
2020: Russia may be the second strongest army in the world
2022: Russia might be the second strongest army in Ukraine
2024: Russia is now the second strongest army in Russia
Whats all the hate about? i dont see you complaining when usa invaded vietnam. zombie.
@@skankhunt_4319nam was bad too bruh
I think you should go check on lunch, your borscht is getting cold
This is the fiftieth time Ive seen this joke, it's getting pretty stale
Same with "Referendum in People's Republic of Kursk" and whatever
@@ShadowOfThePit did you know that around 1/4 Russians do not have indoor plumbing, if you want jokes, you don't need to look any farther than Russia, the whole thing is a joke.
@@ShadowOfThePit its even more stale than the shovel jokes
Ukraine should award millions for private companies to come up with a cheaper anti-drone system.
To which date are you referring to at the start of video vovchansk completely fell in July and they are advancing in Kharkiv direction, please check the latest sources and if the video is with respect to old incidents then it's okay.
July 1 to 31
It seems like only half of Vovchansk is occupied today, check your sources, it seems they smell like Russia
@@osazenomwan i think vovchansk fell in late july
@@simple17226 Sure, and how close they got? 5 meters? Or -5 because Hlyboke is now not russian, but contested area
How do u know all the army positions and their plans?is it satellite images?if so can u tell us how u did it?
Several units have social media (for example, Azov and the 3rd Assault brigade both have youtube channels where they post-combat footage) or the soldiers in each unit have social media and mention the area of the front they are in. That being said not every unit has its exact location known at every moment so I wouldn't be surprised if the unit icons you see in the video are a rough guess based on people and equipment seen operating on that part of the front.
As for plans, it's mostly guesses about what people see happening and what soldiers on the ground are saying about how they are being attacked.
Compared to 2023, more sides want to talk about negotiation, this is still better than there no attempt to negotiatiate at all
A compromise could be eastern Ukrainian land broken off to form separate country. Of course this is if Ukrain cannot reclaim any lost land at all militarily.
@@nomooon It doesn't matter either way, unfortunately. It's all too clear that Russia will just attack again to take the territory, when they're better prepared.
Thank you for making these videos, they're very informative. It will take a long time before historians can accurately chronicle how everything happened, but articles and content like this will have to do for now. I hope you can parse through the propaganda.
This sittte is real
"Once again, for the second time in this war" You pay the script writers by word count?
No. Emphasized it myself. I know it is a tautology, but sometimes you want to really accentuate something
@@KingsandGenerals That makes sense.
At this point If Russia keep advancing Ukraine will definitely lose their country
Russia is advancing yes but with their speed it will take millions of casualties and years to occupy all of ukraine
@@siebedegryse Ukrainian frontlines are collapsing leading to faster advances
The preface of "unprovoked invasion" please needs to stop. Anyone who knows geopolitics in any depth knows this is untrue. You can argue and debate that it is indeed unjustified, and I tend to agree, but that is not what unprovoked means.
Multiple accounts who have never commented on this channels videos, are making the same claim
This channel made a video explaining why Russia’s invasion was unprovoked
I know what unprovoked means, do you? We are talking about international relations and law, not a street fight. Ukraine did nothing to provoke Russia.
@@KingsandGenerals This guys already a lost cause, he's subscribed to Tucker Carlson.
War is going so slow that it almost feels like its halted