This is what happens when you don't understand cameras and test procedures. If you want anything but a white photo the camera is miles away with exposure so low most of the scene is straight up invisible. Infrared cameras may also be used. Remember this is hotter than the sun.. Don't believe me? Get a (cheap) camera and lower the exposure all the way untill you see nothing,, then point it at the sun.. Invisible earth, visible sun. Congrats you are a fake human that doesn't exist and now you're camera is permanently grainy (PS don't look at the sun though glass or with naked eyes you will go blind and so will the camera)
It's obvious to me that this guy don't know his azz from a hole in the ground. Cameras were placed in blast and radiation proof enclosures. It's called engineering and not all that hard to do. You'd be surprised at what a couple of inches of steel and concrete will withstand.
Decades ago it was also stated that various pics are done with protected camera & film inside a housing with filters and a heat activated shutter closing the box, probably similar to todays building fire damper steel shutters using a fusible link that melts at a specific temp. Similarly with rocket launches close pics of exhaust on launchpad.
I can say that right out at the Test Site about an Hr outside of Las Vegas there are still remnants of these exact tests out there 1 of the Building that didn’t completely disintegrate is still out there The Giant Craters I wouldn’t be surprised that The Gov & Military faked the ish But there’s still remnants and then what about the ones The US AND RUSSIA did in the Oceans Was that really in the tub ? Would make more sense than killing all that sea life But then You start to think if they both knew the other was faking it Then who were they really trying to scare ???? 🤔 Uhh Yeaaa… 🫵
No, it's just wild because everyone we're told about radiation is a deliberate lie. Like, they label Plutonium as "radioactive waste" when it isn't. It's that it is worth a sh*t ton and they don't want anyone else going near it.
Oh man, where's the "Japan never got nuked" dipshits? I'm sure they exist, right? I mean, people believe the Earth is flat. I'm sure some Eddie Bravo loving soy boys would get on board.
They were hardly zoomed in as you can clearly still see perspective. The blast 100% hit those camera towers. They were just built into concrete v-towers designed to withstand the blast.
@@Superabound2They only look like miniatures because it's a model of a house and a car. The military doesnt go bombing fully fleshed out buildings, thatd be time and cost ineffective. They build life sized replicas of these things or use old or dummy equipment to simulate the real deal. The blast is real, the footage is spliced between pre detonation and during. The time between, they were probably setting up things or running checks which can also be too time consuming (minutes to hours) to try to put in a 10 second clip. Film couldve also been damaged somehow requiring a splice between best shot and det shot. If that's a miniature there was a fine craftsman who did it, the finest in human history with highly advanced tech to get every fine detail right.
It takes the tiniest bit of research on this to know the footage is real. The same men who were smart enough to build the bomb were also smart enough to figure out how to film the explosion.
@@bryanfongo327 Reuters has a fact-check article on this that explains it. Something about splicing together the camera test footage (before the car arrives to the scene) and the actual bomb test footage (after the car has been placed)
@@bryanfongo327it is before the explosion quite clearly. It is an edit to bw showed to very high official it is not this second happened this and the next this. I mean you can clearly see the edit on the film it is not that great
Research wasn't even needed, it's a clip out of context as usual. Just finish watching the actual podcast and you'll see they talk about the correct answer.
Even if it’s in bunkers just look how is just completely tear’s everything up and the camera in the “bunker” is fine??? I don’t believe that the bomb was real. Plzz explain why it is and why is the camera not messed up
@@samjmk3029two separate footage reels, one showing just the house. next one was literally the very second the bomb detonated, they could have placed the car there before then.
@@samjmk3029 The footage of the explosion was running at much higher fps, no need for pre-footage to run at such high speeds. Two footages probably are hours or even days apart. Different films as well. This guy is an idiot.
@da324 no, but when Jordan Peterson was on his show talking about the bible and God he had nothing to say. But when others on his show talk about God he makes fun of them and God. Why not make fun of jordan Peterson?
@jasonsanchez3441 I agree Jason, he fully believed in moonlandings I held the belief that joe has no argument of his own but just repeats what he thinks sounds the smartest , I think your jorden peterson analogy was spot on ,, joe is slightly brighter the his dumb comedians friends he has on his mates are dumb he never has shurb n peterson on the same show 😮
@@jasonsanchez3441 He's a conversationalist Not an antagonist or provocateur ... Theres enough of that in the comments and its over done. Being a contrarian on social media is sport and most times serves no purpose other than competitive pursuit of likes.
@@Linkisssthe radiation damages the film when the film is exposed directly to the radiation. The cameras were facing away from the explosion, and were protected from the blast
@@LinkisssTelescopic lenses and mirrors shielded the film from radiation damage. The process of trinity is well known and documented. Conspiracists like this are grifters and fools. Don’t take that pill, not everything is a lie.
Or 9/11, or Pearl Harbor, or WMD’s in Iraq, or what about that time we covered for the Israelis when they killed and maimed hundreds of people on the USS Liberty, then called it an accident?
My dad was born in 59 and was a military brat. When cleaning out my grandparents attic we found my dad's and my uncles old school stuff with duck and cover pamphlets They have in big blue letters the word FLASH! and then what to do ie get under your desk or cower in the hallway facing the wall. Basically instructions on how to kiss your ass goodbye before you get vaporized in a nuclear fireball
@@limabravo6065 Most casualties from a nuclear attack aren't by vapourisation from the fireball, but by injury from flying and falling debris, and severe burns. Breaking the line of sight under a desk will protect you from flash burns and greatly improve your odds of walking away without severe lacerations from shattered windows, which without medical care due to overwhelmed medical resources, could result in life threatening blood loss, or infection, or at the very least, in the short term, impair your ability to gather resources and leave the area, and survive the immediate aftermath. If a nuclear attack is imminent, getting under something like a desk could mean the difference between life and death, so it's advisable.
@@Evan_Bell no shit Sherlock, you understand what a short sarcastic comment is? And I know exactly what happens during a nuclear explosion, from the various methods by which runaway chain reactions are created to how they help initiate the thermo portion of a thermonuclear weapon. And I know these things because my military career was spent around old Mr. Nukey and then I went to work for Sandia. So if you really want to get into the weeds of the effects caused by nuclear and thermonuclear explosions we can do that in excruciating detail. For example during an actual nuclear exchange it wouldn't go down like the end of ww2 or the movies where only 1 bomb is ever used on a target city or whatever. No, high value and strategic targets would be hit with anywhere from 10 to 36 individual warheads depending on what the target was. Take the PSA that New York city put out a few summers back about "Surviving the Big One" all that information was based on the city being hit with 1 bombwhen in reality those 12- 15 weapons have yields of about 8x the bombs used in ww2 at a minimum because almost every single modern nuke is of the variable yield variety. So that PSA should tell people how to put a will together because there's no surviving up to 15 thermonuclear detonations in your city. Or if thats a little depressing just read the snarky anecdote for what it was and move on with life, stop being a pedantic little shithead or if that's too complex don't be the "Well Actually " guy, nobody likes that guy
The cameras were in protected concrete enclosures. They weren’t stupid,they had been blowing up Nukes for years and knew how to take film of their target area.
I have good knowledge as i used to work with atoms.... everything that gets irradiated gets a higher density, it means it shrinks.... this alone destroys the camera! Tje ammount of gamma irradiation from a atom bomb is shocking high.... for normal hunans the numbers dosnt mean annything, but for ppl ho have knowledge its shocking. There is nothing existing which could save the camera! 1000% for sure!! We tryed at company to rwcord our small ass bunker when its operating, but after 1-2 secundes the cam dies.
@@MrCakocalypseThe bunker is in the ground or a maximum of 2 meters above the ground. The cameras are placed over 7-9meters above the ground. They don't build bunkers like that 😂😂😂.Shove your science up your ass
OK my dad worked on the US nuclear programs for 40 years and I can assure you the tests were real. Cameras were placed inside lead boxes on sleds. They used mirrors that were directly facing the light and blast. Thats how they did it. He told me after the late 60's most of the test were done underground for security. Those guys at the Kansas City Bannister plant, Oak Ridge TN. and Los Alamos were the front lines in the cold war.
@@barnabyjones5161literally someone could have placed that car there duh it’s not that deep, and you can clearly tell it’s a real explosion going off on the background that was a real nuclear bomb blast
Smokes enough weed to forget there were actual scientists and engineers involved that designed a V-shaped concrete and lead-lined tower that could make a camera and its footage survive right in the middle of the shock wave.
from angles i dont believe u get some of those shots. im sure its just in a cement casing and stable camera its not that hard to make a case to survive a blast.
The nukes are not as impactful as a firebombing over large area. Much cheaper too. Look at fukushima, after a "meltdown" its livable after 3 years and residents started moving back on droves after 5 years. Vs chernobyl its somehow still not safe?
"Camera set-ups used to capture nuclear weapons testing in the U.S. were specially designed to withstand intense effects from the bombs. Cameras were encased in steel and lead, and positioned on towers rooted into the ground with concrete, as outlined in declassified military reports."
@@imca30asplicing together before and after footage for the compilation. It's actual film they literally tape it together. Or it was done by whoever originally posted these old videos on the internet.
@@ericmatteson9868yup, that footage ran from when they set it up until they had the chance to recover it. There is a story behind that car, it was left there and the crew was picked up by another vehicle. The footage was dreadfully long and uneventful so they spliced it
@@ericmatteson9868 You have to remember that computer editing did not exist at the time and computers were not capable of video editing as storage was very limited and tape driven. The edited film was likely done In segments and multiple takes. This could explain the magical appearance of the car. Its not a surprise that there is NO vibration in the footage, as movies filmed in vehicles in motion were very common in the 1930s and subsequent years. Isolation rigging and vibration dampening are used for eliminating the vibration or jigging/ bouncing. Also the faster shutter speed doesn't allow for every single vibration to be recorded and it. Results in the slow motion capture of the footage as seen in this particular clip. Admittedly the whole thing looks like models from a Godzilla movie, and can clearly be seen in the electrical tower scene as it wobbles like only a plastic model could!
Why can we go to Hiroshima and Nagasaki today though? Yet we can't go to Chernobyl? Why did they keep living there since it was bombed? No cancers...Just start googling and it all unravels and sounds weak. He's right and you're just a midwit who swallowed the low information age kool-aid. He's 100% right and anyone with a conscientious skepticism should look into it, and look deep.
For everyone looking in the comments for answers: footage is real, the cameras were positioned in bunkers with lead protection, they are not standing on a tripod next to the blown up house. Also all of the tests involved human observers and were documented also by seismic measurements. They did not need to freak out the Russians in the 50’ bc Russians already had the bombs and whole world had seen what happened in Hiro and Nagas.
If I'm not mistaken, the Soviets didn't have a working atomic bomb yet in 1945, but they were already so close, that they obviously already had full understanding of the principles, to say the least... and therefore no reason to doubt it, or be freaked out. The Soviets would have their first atomic bomb test just 4 years and 25 days after Little Boy detonated over Hiroshima.
For those who didnt listen to the full podcast. He said that he was just theorizing and then later they concluded that they used telescopic lenses. He also basically just said it was a fun theory he had
The cameras were inside bunkers so they were safe from the blast. The car wasnt there before because that was a cut from before the building was prepared to after it was prepared. These were real bombs. You can see the layer of paint and dust that is evaporated from the surface due to the high energy em radiation before the shockwave reaches it. Forgot to mention the cameras were miles away from the buildings and had zoom lenses. The are facing away from the blast and they used mirrors to catch the shots.
It doesn’t work. The main problem is the house. Once the car appears randomly, huge alarm bells. Not sure how this was done, but it’s absolutely not something that’s real, at least with the house. Or maybe there was multiple tests? Issue with that is that it’s the same house (I think). Main issue is this car randomly appearing in the next frame. That’s the alarm bell here. It trumps any thought of “well the way the paint strips off before the explosion” or anything akin to that.
@@nick-dq1hh The first shot is from earlier, they added other things in before the test. I.e. someone said "wait, don't we want to see what it will do to a car?" then they put a car there. Not really that hard to grasp. The way the person has cut the film has unfortunately clouded your view of the events.
If you were Japan would you prefer to surrender to the US or Russia (and the Chinese whom you just massacred) when it became clear the war was going to end. Maybe it was a story to let the Japanese save face and then it just became a bogey man to keep people scared of the government
I can say that right out at the Test Site about an Hr outside of Las Vegas there are still remnants of these exact tests out there 1 of the Building that didn’t completely disintegrate is still out there The Giant Craters I wouldn’t be surprised that The Gov & Military faked the ish But there’s still remnants and then what about the ones The US AND RUSSIA did in the Oceans Was that really in the tub ? Would make more sense than killing all that sea life But then You start to think if they both knew the other was faking it Then who were they really trying to scare ???? 🤔 Uhh Yeaaa… 🫵
According to the documents on that test, said cameras were inside the hulls of heavily modified Sherman tanks that had an additional 4-6 inches of lead lining on top of the steel hull. If the logic applied to this is also applied to Tsar Bomba, how did the plane escape? How did they record it when the shockwave went around Earth 3 full times
@@Xlippo "Why would you assume anyone believes two nukes didn't hit Japan?" I can't make sense of your question. I don't assume that. The only people that believe nukes don't exist and therefore didn't hit Japan, are ones who've researched and thought about it. The non-existence of nukes is not a known or proven fact. But I believe there's a better than 50/50 chance it's true.
For anyone who doesn't know, the camera is on a in a bunker in the side of a hill up to 5 miles away using periscope and zoom lens. They created mini bunkers for these cameras in these tests.
@@sagaraid8871 Its because the film we see is edited. The film without the car is from testing the camera setup a couple of days prior tot he actual test.
Yeah he wasn't talking about the ones we dropped on Japan he's talking about the pictures or films that's showing apparently was just some cardboard fake ass nuclear bombing 🤷
@@thesuperioraffection4502 Tokyo was firebombed and the damage was worse than Hiroshima or Nagasaki but it was a lot more than one plane with more than one bomb and the type of damage was noticeably different 🤣🤷♂️🤦♂️🤫
@@MurlokDredger you said it was "literally." Meaning if we were to take it literally like you wanted us to it would mean this man wouldn't be able to start a sentence. If you're gonna make an analogy atleast make it believable.
Somewhere on TH-cam, there is a video describing what happened back in Japan with incendiary bombs that were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima because everything was wooden, so it didn’t take very much for anything to go up very quickly.
Well, the whole explanation was: "They did just, yeah. Well so there is a yeah. Okay, so here is a question, right? So what happend... okay, this will be great, you will love this. What happened to the camera?"
Because the concepts of a zoom lens is beyond your comprehension, they faked it? Okay. Now, if you want a camera on site, you put it in a concrete bunker with the camera aimed down a pipe to watch the target.
@@jonatikoisuva2695cut and edited. It would be whacky if the car was there after the explosion and just fine. The cut tells me they set up the cameras started rolling test footage, stopped for the day, finished set production then started rolling again. You do know that the test site was built as a real city with houses, shops, cars, patio furniture, plastic mannequins, everything. That bald fucker is disingenuous as fuck.
Believe it or not camera focal length at extreme Zoom will make objects look phony. Cruise ships in the distance when people try to prove Flat Earth is one example I can give you. I'm still wondering if it's real or not I mean the reaction looks exactly how you would expect from the objects the house and the sand.
I haven't watched this JRE, but apparently they were using this as an example of how easy it is to spread misinformation and create conspiracies. This guy apparently knows the videos aren't fake (which they are NOT), he was just showing how easy it is to create doubt and create conspiracies that spread (I haven't confirmed that this is actually what happened in the JRE episode to be clear). Still, you can find all the information on how the cameras were protected. The were at safe distances (some weren't and didn't survive). They were on 8inch thick poles, with buried reinforced concrete anchors that held the electronics, plus additional steal cables holding the poles. The cameras were in steel and lead plate enclosures, special film less sensitive to radiation was used, and additional mirrors allowed it to not look directly at the blast. Believe the car was just added later, but the editing just made it seem like it appeared.
This is the #2 conspiracy origin chart (#1 seems to be extreme literal interpretations of old religious books). "Humans could build the pyramids in 2,500 bc, humans couldn't build nuclear weapons with 1940s technology, humans couldn't go to the moon with 1960s technology... they underestimate the length governments will go to burn through tax money. 😅
Whatever those cameras were in would have been the greatest technology known to man, not only is it able to withstand an exploration of such magnitude the earth tremors didn’t even shake the cameras. The building quite literally disintegrated
There’s no limit to the stuff this idiot doesn’t know. I’m waiting for him to claim @airplanes can’t really fly” reason? Because he’s ignorant of how things work. The real mystery is how Rogan can repeatedly host these shitty guests, pretend they’re. Blowing his mind, and still have followers.
He’s not saying that they didn’t or don’t have Nuclear weapons he’s saying they faked the recording and that’s very likely with everything else at that time they where faking everything for to show the world USA had the power & capability to wipe out anything they wanted to & done in Japan 1945. ☮️. Think he probably has got a strong case.
,those cameras are in a bunker far away and the car was parked there before the explosion, you can literally see that they cut the video so it looks like it magically appeared behind the building. this conspiracy theory needs to stop lol, it's so stupid.
Actually he did. Look at the camera. The camera is not damaged and the film is not damaged. The last part was there was no car and then there was a car. It is all using spliced footage of a blast and fake miniture models.
@@jorgecastellanos6579you mean in the part that is obviously spliced? Like the the clips are from before the blast as after the blast. I don’t know this might sound crazy but maybe the car was parked there between the two shots?
They can't seriously not know how we protected camera equipment back then. Did people forget how powerful a lead box can be? And placed well outside of the blast zone with a zoom lens? My god the nuclear fallout tests are still paying dividends and weeding out the sophism.
Isn’t this a REALLY old video recording system? I don’t think they can zoom far enough to have no destabilization from a nuclear blast. Looks like telescopes exist lol, didnt think of that. Replying trying to debunk me would be beating a dead horse now 😅
For those who don't know, the footage of the car appearing out of no where,.. the footage is regular footage hours before the blast, then it cuts to the blast. So in this case there was no car hours before, then they parked the car there. Footage was spliced together. Also, the footage was recorded inside of heavily fortified bunkers. Some camera footage shakes, or has been edited to stabilize the footage.
@@StreetPreacherr No, they do not. The zoom lense does not exist, it's an implanted memory. Much like the semi-colon and birds; the zoom lense has never existed in the "real" world, only in our memories.
Bro you didn’t listen He’s talking about excessive tests too scare the Russians which the Russians also detonated huge stupid bombs just to say they can It was an idiotic time
Yes, there was a nuclear shelter over 3 stories built just to install a camera and protect it, right? OK... nevermind... ok... Where did that car pop up from the second the explosion happened?!
@mone4988 the car is an addition. You can clearly see the video cut from "before" to "During". Some squint probably wanted it added last minute just to see what it did.
@@RAADRAEIR Are you a for real person? It's obviously a cut in the footage. The car wasn't there before the test, then was there for the test and the footage was spliced. What's so hard to conceive about that? How are you watching a show on TV then ALL OF A SUDDEN there is just a commercial out of nowhere?!?! How is that even possible?!?
Like when he learned that no one discovered any of the *wooden* barges that the Egyptians used to move the pyramids’ bricks across rivers. And then used that as “proof” that they didn’t build the pyramids.
My favorite conspiracy theory is that they hired Kubrick to fake the moon landings, but he's such a perfectionist he made them shoot on location on the moon
@@kasparsbajarsthat's why it takes decades to build a really powerfull micro processors like we use today. Just because it's small doesn't mean that is easy to make.
I love how Joe is easily convinced of something this week and then next week he'll have someone else with the opposite opinion, and then be convinced of that.
This guy believes nukes are real. He is just explaining a conspiracy theory that people believe in. Does explaining a conspiracy theory mean you believe it?
@chigmeister1906 None of them were fake, all of them are recorded on multiple Richter scales in over twenty different countries. It's the same way we know when anybody detonates a nuclear device today, regardless of being underground or above.
@@ssherrierableoh really? Tell me how thats impossible please.. ill wait. Its not like they meant it to survive a nuclear blast and just had some dude holding it. Fr how are you this dumb? Ot was shielded. You know like how all US military hardware is shielded.. they wenrt stupid like your comment.
There is a feature on camera’s called “zoom”. When used it makes it look like you’re right next to what you’re filming. If this is video of the first test those camera’s are 10 Km from ground zero. They also placed cameras in lead boxes mounted to concrete bunkers. They also didn’t point the cameras at the explosions; they pointed them at mirrors that were facing the explosions from 10 Km away so the radiation didn’t destroy the film. Despite this, many cameras and their footage was still lost to the explosions.
People in this comment section are like: "I see all these facts about cameras and nuclear physics but I'm gonna ignore them because my feelings come before facts". Imagine being so stupid that you think zoom lenses are a government conspiracy 😂😂😂
@@okayegg4597 You're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, huh? Ever heard of a jump cut? If you actually watch the original unedited footage, you'll find out that the first shot was several days before the actual bomb detonation, before they had moved everything into place. A day or two before the detonation they put the car there. It's really not that hard to figure out if you have a three-digit IQ.
For those wondering about the camera explanation, they later described in the Joe Rogan podcast that it was done using mirrors, and the camera was actually very deep underground to protect the film from radioactive radiation and the blast itself
It's old film that was literally cut with scissors. So there was a starting FILM piece with no car and then the video with a car. They just cut the film. It's why there is no car for a split second. It's just ONE or TWO frames taken BEFORE the film was taken.
Well as a film maker who studied under the wing of one of the oldest professors (dead now), who worked for Illuminatis/Hollywood/Nasa and more … We’ve been shown proofs that Nasa started as a film production to make Soviets waste money on Space Experiments so they can make them invest less in weapons to win the war, and it worked.
They did not fake them at all my grandfather worked on these tests as a civilian engineer after his service in WW2. He worked for Lawrence Livermore Labs. He actually has photos he personally took of the detonations on the islands and many trips to the desert. I wouldn’t doubt that some was faked though, but definitely not all.
Or why they added a car in the stop motion for no reason to subtract from the credibility. And how did we fake all the radiation and seismic activity that anybody could measure if properly equipped. Kodak accidentally found out about atomic testing when their film was partially exposed by radiation, but we faked the film of it. Nonsense.
@@TrumpAManiaok i know its a joke but like No insect survive a nuke blast, they are only ressistant to the radiation because the exoesqueleton.... Its like saying that Oil is made of dinossaurs
@@JEUNGURA Try google. Concrete bunkers bulletproof glass facing away from the blast. The houses were made of wood. That guy on the podcast must be an idiot. No way to fake that in the 50's.
Every conspiracy theorist’s go to “gotcha” line: Explain how the camera got there. Me & every other rational person: You’re entirely to stupid to invest the time arguing with…
@@Nagi98 if your suggesting that by me stating, “You’re entirely to stupid to invest the time arguing with…” is thereby contradictory to the statement itself, I’d tell you that you must not have much of an understanding for context let alone syntax. The YT comment section under most videos you must find to be a really really boring place for you to read from w/ that razor thin, narrow mind of yours. There are some hilarious thoughts that ppl have out there in the world & personally, I find it special when someone shares that thought w/ the world, especially when it’s one that puts me in stitches. Now I get we all have differences in what we find humorous, but if you want to take everything serious then good for you! But, for the love of god don’t spoil everyone else’s fun & STFU! Thx 😊
@@OVRxNxOUT Like I said, R E AD A G A I N W H A T Y O U W R O T I see you like to laugh reading coments let me tell you a joke, imagine ,people thinking, in 1955, they made BUNKERS, wich are UNDERGROUND shelters, to make a video recording of a nuke exploding....ABOVE GROUND...with remote camera tech wich was invented in 1962...not only that, people are wiling to die on that hill too...gets me every time, a real knee slaper this one, oh boy, let me tell you.
Zoom with that high zoom distance and resolution??, for that time that would be the resolution of a regular distanced camera, so that just wouldn't work, and that still doesn't mask the fact of the car appearing in the background. (joke)
@@snaphaan5049 How is that any less of an explenation than, "Hur hur i cant think of how they would protect a camera so it must have to exploded too duh!" with zero evedence.
Not only that but they used telescopic lenses for the close ups. Do people really think the cameras are anywhere within the vicinity of those structures toppling over??
@@AlexJasso100seriously. It takes a bit for the shockwave to hit at the distance the cameras were at. Plenty of time to film the explosion from a distance and cut before the wave hits.
It was a telephoto lens. My dad was there. Worked as a design engineer. He actually desinged that camera and wS behind 20 layers of plexiglass. Town was constructed for the test. Dad worked at test site. Had 5 cancers. My BIL had silicosis from radioactive sand on the test site. This guy's a nut.
Bro, if your dad really was on the project God Bless him, he helped save the lives of possibly a million brave Americans and at least as many or more brave Japanese soldiers.
He couldnt explain it instantly so it was a compelling arguement. They tell us our phones are way better cameras than what we had in the past and nothing would ever look that clear from so far, so the avg person would believe this arguement easily.
Joe makes his money off of only thinking so hard about anything. In this case he missed: Can people make bunkers? Can the folks who design a bomb hire someone to build a shelter to withstand it? Could this all have been faked? The answer to all of that is "yes", and Joe chooses the most interesting possibility because he's a curious guy who has never conducted a rigorous experiment in his life. Nothing wrong with it, just not a good benchmark for objectivity.
Because Eddie is dumb, but he is obviously dumb. This guy is also dumb but he presents himself as not dumb. The cameras were just far away and in a secure area. You know, the same way we film literally everything dangerous ever. Or did you guys think vulcano clips are filmed right next to the eruption instead of extremely far away but zoomed in? The car situation is just a matter of time. The explosion happend at night, so they used footage of the house during day as a sort of "before and after".
My father died from the exposure to the radiation at the test site, hence the name. A lot of the men in there valley have, because that’s where you worked. Those videos are very real a lot of families lived very close to them.
You're confusing things. The videos are fake. They did run real tests but they needed footage to leak to the Russians to make them see US superiority before the summit during WWII.
My grandpa died before i was born from cancer. He would fly planes into the area after the tests to get atmospheric data. The government denied responsibility until about 10 or so years ago, and gave my grandma a whopping 75k.
All the schizophrenics who think this is fake *literally* think someone saying "yeah trust me" is credible evidence. I suppose you have to work with what you can when you can't understand basic statistics or scientific studies.
@@philindeblanckeep telling yourself that. This guy only has distracting questions with no explanations. You've been convinced by a disinform specialist. Exactly who Russia and China want you to believe.
The camera was in a concrete bunker facing from blast, designed to withstand intact. The later footage was spliced. The before footage shot of just of the house. The blast footage started after final staging including a car. No conspiracy, no mystery.
@@someguyusathis was from the 40's, way before everyone and there mother thought they were experts about everything because they googled there opinion and only tried to find stuff to support it.
1. Idk if you’ve heard about it, but there exists something called concrete bunkers. 2. The camera was mechanical, not electrical. 3. Have you heard of film splicing???
@amatthewdouglascraigdiscov1876 So are you saying that Hiroshima didn't experience a nuclear detonation dropped by the United States? Cuz you're either saying that or you're saying that the US had a completely untested bomb that they were going to drop on a city half way around the world. You're also possibly saying that telescopic cameras don't exist or that the government can't afford them... Both of those are preposterous as well. The government lies a a lot for sure though.
@@raynjpg "no amount of zoom would keep a camera out of the zone of the bomb" that makes zero sense ... how far do you think a shock-wave travels? "that clip where the car randomly appears is pretty damning." It's just a video taken before, and the explosion video edited together, the car was moved inbetween shots. The same camera settings are not going to work for both situations.... it's pretty simple stuff.
@@raynjpg 2 things. 1) We have had the ability to zoom in on the moon to 600x magnification for at least a lifetime before these were tested, probably more than a century. Easily able to record video from miles and miles away. 2) The car situation does seem weird, until you remember that film was expensive and not digital. You would have tested the camera ahead of time, then started it back up later. From the time when they started it to the time when they recorded the blast, someone put a car there. If you were going to fake it to scare the Russians, you wouldn't fuck up and magically put a car in the scene.
that, plus how dangerous the internet is, as it gives any bloody fool a platform. and then other dimwits join them and they convince themselves that they have it all figured out.
@@americarocks1776 Education dones measure how smart someone is but more how indoctrinated. Personally i see smart more as how you fix a problem then i can repeat whatever they told me.
When something is clearly fake the "how" isn't particularly important; first of all people should acknowledge that it was very clearly ans obviously faked, only then should you start asking questions like "how?".
@@outisnemo8443 if only there were materials that were stronger than wooden houses with weatherboard siding... Like, some kind of liquid stone that could be poured and fortified with stronger materials again like steel... And then a thick sheet of something dense to stop the radiation, but we all know that lead doesn't exist...
@@bradstone2603with you, the joke really is on them, did they think the bomb was dropped 2 feet away the bomb was set mile or 2 and in those days you could watch the bombs going off from Vegas the rich n famous would go out and watch it
@@outisnemo8443there is no evidence of it being faked. In fact with what we know about nuclear explosions, this is very much how it looks like and how it would be done if you want the camera survived. Even funnier is that there is clear evidence of them testing the bombs in Nevada and multiple other places around the world.
![[[OFFICIAL MV]] เอิ้นขวัญให้อ้าย- อ๊ะอาย สกุณาพร | ค่ายเพลงเป็นหนึ่ง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/83x6L3X3qh0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.7 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2rPGOyKs0VE/mqdefault.jpg)
From #2010 with Marc Andreessen.
Timestamp: [00:32:00].
This is what happens when you don't understand cameras and test procedures.
If you want anything but a white photo the camera is miles away with exposure so low most of the scene is straight up invisible. Infrared cameras may also be used.
Remember this is hotter than the sun.. Don't believe me? Get a (cheap) camera and lower the exposure all the way untill you see nothing,, then point it at the sun.. Invisible earth, visible sun. Congrats you are a fake human that doesn't exist and now you're camera is permanently grainy
(PS don't look at the sun though glass or with naked eyes you will go blind and so will the camera)
It's obvious to me that this guy don't know his azz from a hole in the ground. Cameras were placed in blast and radiation proof enclosures. It's called engineering and not all that hard to do. You'd be surprised at what a couple of inches of steel and concrete will withstand.
Damn
Decades ago it was also stated that various pics are done with protected camera & film inside a housing with filters and a heat activated shutter closing the box, probably similar to todays building fire damper steel shutters using a fusible link that melts at a specific temp.
Similarly with rocket launches close pics of exhaust on launchpad.
Goat
We all know camera man never dies.
Watch the movie Blair witch project they kill the camera guy
Omg you you sir are the truth you put the camera guy to rest no one is safe 😂😂😂
And Cloverfield 😂😂😂
So does the car man
This is where he got his superpower from, this is where he started
The camera was miles away in a lead lined bunker with a giant lens. You can go see them today
Someone promote this comment. You beat me to it. These people need to know
And the car?
But what about the car apearing out of nowhere?
I can say that right out at the Test Site about an Hr outside of Las Vegas there are still remnants of these exact tests out there
1 of the Building that didn’t completely disintegrate is still out there
The Giant Craters
I wouldn’t be surprised that The Gov & Military faked the ish
But there’s still remnants
and then what about the ones The US AND RUSSIA did in the Oceans
Was that really in the tub ?
Would make more sense than killing all that sea life
But then You start to think if they both knew the other was faking it
Then who were they really trying to scare ???? 🤔
Uhh Yeaaa… 🫵
What About the car? What about the car labowski?? Where's the money fuck heaaad!? 😭 🚽
That guy sounds like he's waited his entire life to have this conversation
No, it's just wild because everyone we're told about radiation is a deliberate lie. Like, they label Plutonium as "radioactive waste" when it isn't. It's that it is worth a sh*t ton and they don't want anyone else going near it.
For real😂 he’s all excited to show how the next one
Edit: I came back and read my comment and I have no idea what I was even trying to say wtf😂🤦🏽♂️
The truth shall see you free
cause nobody believe his made up crap
😂😂😂😂😂
The mere fact that they believed this guy disappoints me and street cred went down a notch.
Bro Graham Hancock got a whole show on Netflix cuz he blows Joe Rogans mind lmao
@@tonymontana1996 agreed. Leftflix definitely decided to do that because of Joe Rogan.
Wait sorry I'm idk a lot about this so they re not fake and he's just making it up? Are they real footage
@@reinaldoruiz1346It’s real footage. Are y’all watching this show for facts? You’re not gonna find any.
Who actually cares if it’s fake or real or what people believe lmao?
Im sure japan didn't think it was fake
wut
Japan isn't real.
Yeah because we dropped two actual bombs on their ass.
Oh man, where's the "Japan never got nuked" dipshits? I'm sure they exist, right? I mean, people believe the Earth is flat. I'm sure some Eddie Bravo loving soy boys would get on board.
@@Jager5509its a cover up for something big
It's almost as if the cameras were reinforced in concrete shelters and were zoomed in
They were hardly zoomed in as you can clearly still see perspective. The blast 100% hit those camera towers. They were just built into concrete v-towers designed to withstand the blast.
@@FrankyFeedler engineers back then were geniuses ngl
such technology is inconceivable
Explain the magic car
I'm glad that everyone realized how stupid this guy was being lol
"How'd they fake it?"
"They just did" impeccable.
I thought the same thing until I did research on it…the camera was stabilized inside a super thick solid block of lead…this dude just got debunked LOL
They're obviously miniatures
@@Superabound2 How do you miniaturize dust? Particles aren't even easy know with the latest and greatest processors and simulations.
@@Superabound2They only look like miniatures because it's a model of a house and a car. The military doesnt go bombing fully fleshed out buildings, thatd be time and cost ineffective. They build life sized replicas of these things or use old or dummy equipment to simulate the real deal. The blast is real, the footage is spliced between pre detonation and during. The time between, they were probably setting up things or running checks which can also be too time consuming (minutes to hours) to try to put in a 10 second clip. Film couldve also been damaged somehow requiring a splice between best shot and det shot. If that's a miniature there was a fine craftsman who did it, the finest in human history with highly advanced tech to get every fine detail right.
Mineature houses
Joe was higher than usual in this one 😂
It takes the tiniest bit of research on this to know the footage is real. The same men who were smart enough to build the bomb were also smart enough to figure out how to film the explosion.
Googled it and they're definitely real, but what about the car one?
@@bryanfongo327 Reuters has a fact-check article on this that explains it. Something about splicing together the camera test footage (before the car arrives to the scene) and the actual bomb test footage (after the car has been placed)
@@bryanfongo327it is before the explosion quite clearly. It is an edit to bw showed to very high official it is not this second happened this and the next this. I mean you can clearly see the edit on the film it is not that great
Research wasn't even needed, it's a clip out of context as usual. Just finish watching the actual podcast and you'll see they talk about the correct answer.
So how camra could survived this, because there is still no a swer
I always assumed the cameras were housed inside reinforced bunkers.
They were
They're called V barriers, iow, it slices through the blast, like a ship cutting through water.
Anyone who lived in Nevada knows they weren't faked. F'n dumb ass..
Even if it’s in bunkers just look how is just completely tear’s everything up and the camera in the “bunker” is fine??? I don’t believe that the bomb was real. Plzz explain why it is and why is the camera not messed up
The man said they fucking with he camera, Clearly. These mofuckas wanna say they were housed in bunkers. 🤦🏾♂️
For those of you curious: the camera was actually several miles away in a concrete bunker, hooked up to a telescope
Yes there was no car in the first but why did the car appear just after the flash when the guy asks to see the first clip again
@@samjmk3029 because the First bit aint split seconds before a nuclear blast the second bit is..
@@samjmk3029two separate footage reels, one showing just the house. next one was literally the very second the bomb detonated, they could have placed the car there before then.
For some of the tests they also had concrete bunkers underground with a hole to the surface and used mirrors to capture the footage.
@@samjmk3029 The footage of the explosion was running at much higher fps, no need for pre-footage to run at such high speeds. Two footages probably are hours or even days apart. Different films as well. This guy is an idiot.
I love how joe rogan never challenges anybody he thinks is smarter than him.
You think just because someone showed him something he wasn't aware of....he now believes that person is smarter than him?
@da324 no, but when Jordan Peterson was on his show talking about the bible and God he had nothing to say. But when others on his show talk about God he makes fun of them and God. Why not make fun of jordan Peterson?
@@da324 he didn't even try to challenge this guy
@jasonsanchez3441 I agree Jason, he fully believed in moonlandings I held the belief that joe has no argument of his own but just repeats what he thinks sounds the smartest , I think your jorden peterson analogy was spot on ,, joe is slightly brighter the his dumb comedians friends he has on his mates are dumb he never has shurb n peterson on the same show 😮
@@jasonsanchez3441 He's a conversationalist
Not an antagonist or provocateur ...
Theres enough of that in the comments and its over done. Being a contrarian on social media is sport and most times serves no purpose other than competitive pursuit of likes.
Proof that confidence can mask stupidity
That could not be said any better... perfect.
2 things can be true at the same time: the bombs are real, some of their filming is fake, a recreation (because radiation damages the film).
@@Linkisss Not fake. Postulate away but you can't fake this with 90 year old tech.
@@Linkisssthe radiation damages the film when the film is exposed directly to the radiation. The cameras were facing away from the explosion, and were protected from the blast
@@LinkisssTelescopic lenses and mirrors shielded the film from radiation damage. The process of trinity is well known and documented. Conspiracists like this are grifters and fools. Don’t take that pill, not everything is a lie.
Man's qualifications are watching history channel between 2 naps.
Lmao
That's most of the people on Joe Rogan
@@MasonharlowI am that person
wooow, that's insaaane!!!
You're the kind of guy to wipe your ass, get shit on your finger then wonder what is on your finger...
The camera was inside a reinforced steel shell with 4 inch bandit glass. My father retired from Los Alamos as a physicist. We didn't fake anything.
Except the gulf of Tonkin incident
And the Kennedy assassination and Pearl Harbor and the USS Maine and the last three years.
“Yeah America totally is legit. They never lied or faked anything” 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Or 9/11, or Pearl Harbor, or WMD’s in Iraq, or what about that time we covered for the Israelis when they killed and maimed hundreds of people on the USS Liberty, then called it an accident?
@@bravotoomuch4218 Did you just say Pearl Harbor? You dumb?
When a bomb siren goes off, don't crouch under a desk, just hide in the concrete and lead-lined camera box.
The camera box wasn't concrete, it was lead lined steel.
But hiding under a desk would be an advisable measure to take for many people.
My dad was born in 59 and was a military brat. When cleaning out my grandparents attic we found my dad's and my uncles old school stuff with duck and cover pamphlets
They have in big blue letters the word
FLASH! and then what to do ie get under your desk or cower in the hallway facing the wall. Basically instructions on how to kiss your ass goodbye before you get vaporized in a nuclear fireball
@@limabravo6065 Most casualties from a nuclear attack aren't by vapourisation from the fireball, but by injury from flying and falling debris, and severe burns. Breaking the line of sight under a desk will protect you from flash burns and greatly improve your odds of walking away without severe lacerations from shattered windows, which without medical care due to overwhelmed medical resources, could result in life threatening blood loss, or infection, or at the very least, in the short term, impair your ability to gather resources and leave the area, and survive the immediate aftermath.
If a nuclear attack is imminent, getting under something like a desk could mean the difference between life and death, so it's advisable.
@@Evan_Bell no shit Sherlock, you understand what a short sarcastic comment is? And I know exactly what happens during a nuclear explosion, from the various methods by which runaway chain reactions are created to how they help initiate the thermo portion of a thermonuclear weapon. And I know these things because my military career was spent around old Mr. Nukey and then I went to work for Sandia. So if you really want to get into the weeds of the effects caused by nuclear and thermonuclear explosions we can do that in excruciating detail. For example during an actual nuclear exchange it wouldn't go down like the end of ww2 or the movies where only 1 bomb is ever used on a target city or whatever. No, high value and strategic targets would be hit with anywhere from 10 to 36 individual warheads depending on what the target was. Take the PSA that New York city put out a few summers back about "Surviving the Big One" all that information was based on the city being hit with 1 bombwhen in reality those 12- 15 weapons have yields of about 8x the bombs used in ww2 at a minimum because almost every single modern nuke is of the variable yield variety. So that PSA should tell people how to put a will together because there's no surviving up to 15 thermonuclear detonations in your city.
Or if thats a little depressing just read the snarky anecdote for what it was and move on with life, stop being a pedantic little shithead or if that's too complex don't be the
"Well Actually " guy, nobody likes that guy
The cameras were in protected concrete enclosures. They weren’t stupid,they had been blowing up Nukes for years and knew how to take film of their target area.
Steel and concrete, shielded by lead, on the inside of the enclosures.
And magically appearing cars ....
It’s like these guys never heard of a telescopic lens
@@TheeShastyMcNasty watch the original, not this edited crap.
Exactly, this stoner rewriting of history is total bullshit.
"How they fake it?"
"They just did"
My new argument
Canon
Lmao
I have good knowledge as i used to work with atoms.... everything that gets irradiated gets a higher density, it means it shrinks.... this alone destroys the camera! Tje ammount of gamma irradiation from a atom bomb is shocking high.... for normal hunans the numbers dosnt mean annything, but for ppl ho have knowledge its shocking. There is nothing existing which could save the camera! 1000% for sure!! We tryed at company to rwcord our small ass bunker when its operating, but after 1-2 secundes the cam dies.
They faked it by using handmade models
@@MrCakocalypseThe bunker is in the ground or a maximum of 2 meters above the ground. The cameras are placed over 7-9meters above the ground. They don't build bunkers like that 😂😂😂.Shove your science up your ass
Nothing more infuriating than a guy laughing smuggly whilst he’s explaining something he’s completely wrong about.
Needs a word beyond smug for it
Flat earthers and religious debaters in a nutshell.
@@altingashi3927yeah, Japan was totally in on it too.
Faking all that death and surrender
@@altingashi3927 you are worse than flat earthers if you think nuclear weapons are fake.
How is he wrong
OK my dad worked on the US nuclear programs for 40 years and I can assure you the tests were real.
Cameras were placed inside lead boxes on sleds. They used mirrors that were directly facing the light and blast. Thats how they did it. He told me after the late 60's most of the test were done underground for security. Those guys at the Kansas City Bannister plant, Oak Ridge TN. and Los Alamos were the front lines in the cold war.
So we're supposed to believe you a stranger online who says their dad swears nukes are real? Are we in third grade here or what? Smh
@@brentc4593 I don't care what you believe, but even a 3rd grader would not by this "we faked the nuclear bomb images" bull shit.
@@brentc4593I guess we didn’t nuke japan then, cause nukes are fake
Who was driving the car, Matthew?
@@barnabyjones5161literally someone could have placed that car there duh it’s not that deep, and you can clearly tell it’s a real explosion going off on the background that was a real nuclear bomb blast
Smokes enough weed to forget telephoto lenses exist.
Smokes enough weed to forget there were actual scientists and engineers involved that designed a V-shaped concrete and lead-lined tower that could make a camera and its footage survive right in the middle of the shock wave.
from angles i dont believe u get some of those shots. im sure its just in a cement casing and stable camera its not that hard to make a case to survive a blast.
He talks about the mirrors other things they used like right after the clip ends
The car
You’re crazy if you expect me to believe that a Lense is stronger than a nuke
Maybe the lense, but not the camera😂
Japan: "Russia wtf, you told us it was fake"
Hawaii wasn't fake either
Dude this took place long after WWII, Russia and the United States were allies in WWII… You’re historically illiterate.
The nukes are not as impactful as a firebombing over large area. Much cheaper too. Look at fukushima, after a "meltdown" its livable after 3 years and residents started moving back on droves after 5 years. Vs chernobyl its somehow still not safe?
@@ZiggyJr The Earth is flat too right?
@@kathydeaton251no and that’s why they got their asses kicked through the pacific campaign and two atom bombs shoved up their asses
"Camera set-ups used to capture nuclear weapons testing in the U.S. were specially designed to withstand intense effects from the bombs. Cameras were encased in steel and lead, and positioned on towers rooted into the ground with concrete, as outlined in declassified military reports."
Cool, so how about that car, tho?
@@imca30asplicing together before and after footage for the compilation. It's actual film they literally tape it together. Or it was done by whoever originally posted these old videos on the internet.
@@ericmatteson9868yup, that footage ran from when they set it up until they had the chance to recover it. There is a story behind that car, it was left there and the crew was picked up by another vehicle. The footage was dreadfully long and uneventful so they spliced it
B...b...but muh kon-spear-uh-c!
@@ericmatteson9868 You have to remember that computer editing did not exist at the time and computers were not capable of video editing as storage was very limited and tape driven. The edited film was likely done In segments and multiple takes. This could explain the magical appearance of the car. Its not a surprise that there is NO vibration in the footage, as movies filmed in vehicles in motion were very common in the 1930s and subsequent years. Isolation rigging and vibration dampening are used for eliminating the vibration or jigging/ bouncing. Also the faster shutter speed doesn't allow for every single vibration to be recorded and it. Results in the slow motion capture of the footage as seen in this particular clip. Admittedly the whole thing looks like models from a Godzilla movie, and can clearly be seen in the electrical tower scene as it wobbles like only a plastic model could!
His idiocy is in the megaton range.
Yea because it's not like the whole world believes these videos when presented at face value either. Shut up
Under the current circumstances I wouldn't be surprised if he was right
You mean yours? The real idiot here is you.
Yup. What a tool.
Why can we go to Hiroshima and Nagasaki today though? Yet we can't go to Chernobyl? Why did they keep living there since it was bombed? No cancers...Just start googling and it all unravels and sounds weak. He's right and you're just a midwit who swallowed the low information age kool-aid. He's 100% right and anyone with a conscientious skepticism should look into it, and look deep.
For everyone looking in the comments for answers: footage is real, the cameras were positioned in bunkers with lead protection, they are not standing on a tripod next to the blown up house. Also all of the tests involved human observers and were documented also by seismic measurements. They did not need to freak out the Russians in the 50’ bc Russians already had the bombs and whole world had seen what happened in Hiro and Nagas.
If I'm not mistaken, the Soviets didn't have a working atomic bomb yet in 1945, but they were already so close, that they obviously already had full understanding of the principles, to say the least... and therefore no reason to doubt it, or be freaked out.
The Soviets would have their first atomic bomb test just 4 years and 25 days after Little Boy detonated over Hiroshima.
thank you for this, its sad that this needs to be explained..
@@cykeok3525 Actually traitors in the United States gave the bomb to the Russians.
shit ton of TNT... We know about Bikini Island
Thanks pal we all saw Oppenheimer
This guy is gonna lose his shit when he finds out you can zoom in
shh shhhhh . his pea sized smooth brain would explode.
did u watch the video he explain abaout the car to , where is it come from?
@@tamapratama388it was probably the reason it blew up. 😂
You all are so fucking stupid
The first camera to zoom was first used in 1927 and could only do so 1.5 times the normal focal length
For those who didnt listen to the full podcast. He said that he was just theorizing and then later they concluded that they used telescopic lenses. He also basically just said it was a fun theory he had
Nah its fake
Still doesn't explain the car
This should be pinned on top. Although i would've missed the roller coaster ride reading the comments until i got here.
@@sraitama9412tell that to the Japanese.
@@GawdsNectarwhat about the car just appearing out of nowhere. He said its a theory because he was threatened
The cameras were inside bunkers so they were safe from the blast. The car wasnt there before because that was a cut from before the building was prepared to after it was prepared. These were real bombs. You can see the layer of paint and dust that is evaporated from the surface due to the high energy em radiation before the shockwave reaches it. Forgot to mention the cameras were miles away from the buildings and had zoom lenses. The are facing away from the blast and they used mirrors to catch the shots.
Yes they were real... just REALly small dioramas
@@drkdale anything to counter what i said and support your point?
Well put. Sometimes I wonder if Joe Rogan is truly this highly regarded or if it's an act because he knows is target audience is stoners 🤤
It doesn’t work. The main problem is the house. Once the car appears randomly, huge alarm bells. Not sure how this was done, but it’s absolutely not something that’s real, at least with the house. Or maybe there was multiple tests? Issue with that is that it’s the same house (I think).
Main issue is this car randomly appearing in the next frame. That’s the alarm bell here. It trumps any thought of “well the way the paint strips off before the explosion” or anything akin to that.
@@nick-dq1hh The first shot is from earlier, they added other things in before the test. I.e. someone said "wait, don't we want to see what it will do to a car?" then they put a car there. Not really that hard to grasp. The way the person has cut the film has unfortunately clouded your view of the events.
Japan: doesn't feel fake
cold war stuff not ww2 Russia was our friends in ww2
We blew ourselves up each time,
We just shifted dimensions
If you were Japan would you prefer to surrender to the US or Russia (and the Chinese whom you just massacred) when it became clear the war was going to end. Maybe it was a story to let the Japanese save face and then it just became a bogey man to keep people scared of the government
I can say that right out at the Test Site about an Hr outside of Las Vegas there are still remnants of these exact tests out there
1 of the Building that didn’t completely disintegrate is still out there
The Giant Craters
I wouldn’t be surprised that The Gov & Military faked the ish
But there’s still remnants
and then what about the ones The US AND RUSSIA did in the Oceans
Was that really in the tub ?
Would make more sense than killing all that sea life
But then You start to think if they both knew the other was faking it
Then who were they really trying to scare ???? 🤔
Uhh Yeaaa… 🫵
@@monkmoto1887no
“Jamie, pull up that video of the bear holding the camera during the bomb testing”
Stoooopppppp omfg 😅 the fucking bear. I look at the comments just for the bear line in every one dammit
🤣😂😂🤣
Never gets old haha 😂
@@JesseHMcCauleyexactly 😂
...and pass me the DMT pipe
According to the documents on that test, said cameras were inside the hulls of heavily modified Sherman tanks that had an additional 4-6 inches of lead lining on top of the steel hull. If the logic applied to this is also applied to Tsar Bomba, how did the plane escape? How did they record it when the shockwave went around Earth 3 full times
I'm sure the two Japanese cities didn't think it was fake.
They didn't know what hit them, but it wasn't a nuke.
@@jonsmith3945 why not?
Why would you assume anyone believes two nukes didn't hit Japan?
@@Xlippobecause they were Abombs, not nukes.
@@Xlippo "Why would you assume anyone believes two nukes didn't hit Japan?"
I can't make sense of your question. I don't assume that. The only people that believe nukes don't exist and therefore didn't hit Japan, are ones who've researched and thought about it.
The non-existence of nukes is not a known or proven fact. But I believe there's a better than 50/50 chance it's true.
Clips like this is what will turn Idiocracy into a prophecy.
😅😂😅
Holy shit I forgot this movie even existed
Very prophetic
We have been here for years now.
@@sunshine23.141 Oh yeah, we're well on our way.
For anyone who doesn't know, the camera is on a in a bunker in the side of a hill up to 5 miles away using periscope and zoom lens. They created mini bunkers for these cameras in these tests.
Are those bunkers in the room with us now?
Was Dumbledore just switched the car there to get the bomb😂😂😂 why are you so ignorance
@@sagaraid8871 Its because the film we see is edited. The film without the car is from testing the camera setup a couple of days prior tot he actual test.
@@sagaraid8871why are you so ignorance??? You’re an idiot
But what about that car? That’s got notta to do with camera protection.
Nagasaki and Hiroshima would like to inform this guy that they were, in fact, real bombs.
Hes not saying that the bombs werent real. Hes saying that the footage is fake. Has nobody watched the full thing 🤣🤣🤦♂️
F I R E B O M B S
Yeah he wasn't talking about the ones we dropped on Japan he's talking about the pictures or films that's showing apparently was just some cardboard fake ass nuclear bombing 🤷
He's not saying that the bombs were fake what he is saying is that the USA faked the power of the bomb 😂😂😂
@@thesuperioraffection4502 Tokyo was firebombed and the damage was worse than Hiroshima or Nagasaki but it was a lot more than one plane with more than one bomb and the type of damage was noticeably different 🤣🤷♂️🤦♂️🤫
This guy is like a golden retriever. Man just couldn't finish a sentence.
Coke is a crazy drug
I see I found the real deep thinkers
that doesnt make sense😅
@@MurlokDredgera retriever wouldn't be able to START a sentence.
@@MurlokDredger you said it was "literally." Meaning if we were to take it literally like you wanted us to it would mean this man wouldn't be able to start a sentence. If you're gonna make an analogy atleast make it believable.
Wow. They faked the footage but also actually made the bomb. That's what I call an epic prank.
I bet hell tell you that they never had the bomb and they just hired a few hundred thousand japanese crisis actors. This is such a stupid Theory
Moon landing much?
@@AB-nb2ic no you?
@@manmandersonhow can the comment exist then?
how do we know?
Japan: “Are you sure about that?”
What does Japan have to do with this the Cold War was long after that. Did he say "The bombs dropped on Japan were fake"?
to be fair. There wasn't really a car there in the first place. Where did that come from?
Somewhere on TH-cam, there is a video describing what happened back in Japan with incendiary bombs that were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima because everything was wooden, so it didn’t take very much for anything to go up very quickly.
@@koollio9724 Its a joke dude
😂😂😂😂 nice
This is how conspiracy theories spread.
NO it's not. When too many "Coincidence": Occur along certain lines THEN people will think about a conspriacy!
"They just did, yeah" the clearest explanation I've ever heard
😂
Well, the whole explanation was: "They did just, yeah. Well so there is a yeah. Okay, so here is a question, right? So what happend... okay, this will be great, you will love this. What happened to the camera?"
The comment I was looking for...
Lmao exactly lol
At least back in the day, they would say "You could do that with mirrors!". And they would be right on this. Magic!
-How did they fake it?
-They just did.
Brilliant.
Truly an impenetrable argument bravo 👏😂😂
Because the concepts of a zoom lens is beyond your comprehension, they faked it? Okay. Now, if you want a camera on site, you put it in a concrete bunker with the camera aimed down a pipe to watch the target.
@@donaldkasper8346 Yeah the camera is even facing away from the explosion
Except the used real men in navada and New Mexico I’ve been there radiation still in the ground and wa stayed 2 months plus there
Thier models
This guy's mind is gonna be blown when he finds out about the zoom lens
Yes because nobody took into account a zoom lens. You really that dense?
Then explain the car no car picture 🤷
@@jonatikoisuva2695cut and edited. It would be whacky if the car was there after the explosion and just fine. The cut tells me they set up the cameras started rolling test footage, stopped for the day, finished set production then started rolling again.
You do know that the test site was built as a real city with houses, shops, cars, patio furniture, plastic mannequins, everything. That bald fucker is disingenuous as fuck.
@@danieljoseph9439 yeah, you don't believe in nukes but I'm dense 🤣
@@jonatikoisuva2695that's called a jump cut, there was footage of the site before, after and during the test.
Hope that helps!
How tf do you think they get pictures from an SR71? Or a U2? Or a satellite? It’s called a telescopic lens.
Cameras had pretty damn good zoom back then guys. This is what happens when your stoned and someone tells you a lie
Lol, take your next booster😂
Believe it or not camera focal length at extreme Zoom will make objects look phony. Cruise ships in the distance when people try to prove Flat Earth is one example I can give you. I'm still wondering if it's real or not I mean the reaction looks exactly how you would expect from the objects the house and the sand.
@@moefritz9568
What does that have to do with this one, junior?
I haven't watched this JRE, but apparently they were using this as an example of how easy it is to spread misinformation and create conspiracies. This guy apparently knows the videos aren't fake (which they are NOT), he was just showing how easy it is to create doubt and create conspiracies that spread (I haven't confirmed that this is actually what happened in the JRE episode to be clear).
Still, you can find all the information on how the cameras were protected. The were at safe distances (some weren't and didn't survive). They were on 8inch thick poles, with buried reinforced concrete anchors that held the electronics, plus additional steal cables holding the poles. The cameras were in steel and lead plate enclosures, special film less sensitive to radiation was used, and additional mirrors allowed it to not look directly at the blast.
Believe the car was just added later, but the editing just made it seem like it appeared.
@@bengsynthmusiclet the anti vaxxers be bro natural selection
"How did they fake it?"
"Uh, They just did." 😂😂😂
😂The USA is full of bullshit ones again how the fuck do they sleep at nights 😂😂
Sounds pretty conclusive to me 😂😂😂
No need for the trivia. Used the tried and tested scale modelling and composite techniques.
Joe is so fake.
Disgusting
And Ruskiz were like, oh, it must be true...
If you don’t know how something is done, doesn’t mean it can’t be done
This is the #2 conspiracy origin chart (#1 seems to be extreme literal interpretations of old religious books). "Humans could build the pyramids in 2,500 bc, humans couldn't build nuclear weapons with 1940s technology, humans couldn't go to the moon with 1960s technology... they underestimate the length governments will go to burn through tax money. 😅
Whatever those cameras were in would have been the greatest technology known to man, not only is it able to withstand an exploration of such magnitude the earth tremors didn’t even shake the cameras.
The building quite literally disintegrated
There’s no limit to the stuff this idiot doesn’t know.
I’m waiting for him to claim @airplanes can’t really fly” reason? Because he’s ignorant of how things work.
The real mystery is how Rogan can repeatedly host these shitty guests, pretend they’re. Blowing his mind, and still have followers.
@@a.a163they are far away, which is also the reason that the sky appears black.
@@oldycow
Keep telling yourself that 😂
You can see the vinyl paint off the house strip as it gets burned like real burned houses do. Two idiots talking about something they don’t know
Dam your so hurt lol
@@SouthernCali-f1ncamera was WAY back and just zoomed in. Simple
Camera was probably half a mile back and zoomed in. Of course these would've been the best cameras of the time.
He’s not saying that they didn’t or don’t have Nuclear weapons he’s saying they faked the recording and that’s very likely with everything else at that time they where faking everything for to show the world USA had the power & capability to wipe out anything they wanted to & done in Japan 1945. ☮️. Think he probably has got a strong case.
Big boy couldn’t wait to drop that “what happened to the camera” 😂😂
Man's never heard of a telephoto lens
Reinforced concrete bunkers and blockhouses apparently aren't part of his reality.
He's right. It's a big deal.
,those cameras are in a bunker far away and the car was parked there before the explosion, you can literally see that they cut the video so it looks like it magically appeared behind the building. this conspiracy theory needs to stop lol, it's so stupid.
It's funny that Joe just believes anything a guest tells him
That's becoming or now is the main aspect of the Podcast.
His WHOAs are almost better than Joey's!
But the vids were fake tho, so..
Well its crazy how the car appeared from thin air. Or maybe the bomb doesn't destroy but creates things out of thin air
He's the Sid Roth of the non-religious world.
"You son of a bitch." I died right there. 😂
Now have this mind set watching every TH-cam/tiktok. The "cameraman standing right there" ruins most videos
All because you weren't the cameraman
Was funny af 😂😂😂😂
You know Eddie Bravo is waiting by his phone for Rogan to call
😂
I have seen this countless times and cannot believe i never noticed. I feel dumb. 😂😂😂
“How did they fake it?”
“I.. du.. I.. ah..” *Doesn’t answer question*
Actually he did. Look at the camera. The camera is not damaged and the film is not damaged. The last part was there was no car and then there was a car. It is all using spliced footage of a blast and fake miniture models.
You can’t recreate the thermodynamics of a nuclear explosion that accurately using a model. Yes the footage was spliced, but no, it is not fake.
@@cainabel6356 lol, thank you professor.
@@Selatapey but but but @cainabel6356 said it was fake. Surely he's not wrong?!??!?!?1/11111
@@_-_._-.what? Maybe try that one again and have it make sense or contain a shred of substance.
This man is going to freak out when he hears about a telephoto lens for the first time. 😂
😂😂😂
What about the car
You've clearly no idea how much camera lenses can actually zoom.
What about the car?
@@jorgecastellanos6579you mean in the part that is obviously spliced? Like the the clips are from before the blast as after the blast. I don’t know this might sound crazy but maybe the car was parked there between the two shots?
They can't seriously not know how we protected camera equipment back then. Did people forget how powerful a lead box can be? And placed well outside of the blast zone with a zoom lens?
My god the nuclear fallout tests are still paying dividends and weeding out the sophism.
A man of science and god on a joe rogan podcast?
Also can you provide a link to lead boxes being stable during nuclear tests?
Hell, you don't even need the lead shielding. Just get a good-sized refridgerator and hire Indiana Jones as your cameraman.
still doesn't explain the car behind the house
This still doesn't explain the appearing car
Isn’t this a REALLY old video recording system? I don’t think they can zoom far enough to have no destabilization from a nuclear blast.
Looks like telescopes exist lol, didnt think of that. Replying trying to debunk me would be beating a dead horse now 😅
For those who don't know, the footage of the car appearing out of no where,.. the footage is regular footage hours before the blast, then it cuts to the blast. So in this case there was no car hours before, then they parked the car there. Footage was spliced together. Also, the footage was recorded inside of heavily fortified bunkers. Some camera footage shakes, or has been edited to stabilize the footage.
And don't camera's have ZOOM LENSES?
I mean this answer is a completely logical and way more believable explanation to the silly questions posed!
@@StreetPreacherr No, they do not. The zoom lense does not exist, it's an implanted memory. Much like the semi-colon and birds; the zoom lense has never existed in the "real" world, only in our memories.
You can tell the camera was nearby. The ground shakes but the camera doesn’t.
That’s more impressive than faking a moon landing hands down.
ok drop out
@@_-_._-. when you point the finger at someone else you point three back at yourself
HOLD ON !!
I GOTTA CALL THE MOON !!!
LOL. LOLOLOLOLLOL. LOL
LOL. LOL. LOL. LOL
LOL. LOL. LOL. LOL
LOLLOLLOL. LOL. LOL. LOLLOLOLOL
LOLLOLLOL LOLLOLOLOLOL. LOLLOLOLOL
Joe rogan creating millions of morons a day… there is a reason the cameras were affected. Google the reason.
@@RoadSurferOfficialehhh nah you really are a drop out I see
That’s one hell of a placebo affect on Japan
Bro you didn’t listen
He’s talking about excessive tests too scare the Russians which the Russians also detonated huge stupid bombs just to say they can
It was an idiotic time
There’s a Theory that fatman and little boy were actually not nukes, but daisy cutters
😂😂
@@exiledhebrew1994or fire bombs
This was afterwards during the Cold War
What a clown. The cameras were inside reinforced concrete shelters that protected them.
Yes, there was a nuclear shelter over 3 stories built just to install a camera and protect it, right? OK... nevermind... ok... Where did that car pop up from the second the explosion happened?!
@@RAADRAEIR 20+ miles out. Can't explain the car tho
@@RAADRAEIRyou do know how camera lenses work right?
@mone4988 the car is an addition. You can clearly see the video cut from "before" to "During". Some squint probably wanted it added last minute just to see what it did.
@@RAADRAEIR Are you a for real person? It's obviously a cut in the footage. The car wasn't there before the test, then was there for the test and the footage was spliced. What's so hard to conceive about that? How are you watching a show on TV then ALL OF A SUDDEN there is just a commercial out of nowhere?!?! How is that even possible?!?
This guy doesnt know what he's talking about. Everyone knows Chuck Norris was holding the cam. His body shielded the cam from the blast.
That wasn't a nuclear blast, Chuck Norris just farted
Ah the good old Chuck Norris meme... how have you been? Its been years since I've seen you.
Yeah the video Is definitely fake, the USA doesn’t need a bomb to scare the Russians when they have Chuck Norris.
💯💯💯💯🥊😂😂😂😂😂
@@the98themperoroftheholybri33damn it you beat me to it.
In response, the Tsar Bomb came, haha it worked really well 😂
Joe never met a conspiracy he didn't buy.
lol
😂😂😂 big facts
Joe MAMA
Like when he learned that no one discovered any of the *wooden* barges that the Egyptians used to move the pyramids’ bricks across rivers. And then used that as “proof” that they didn’t build the pyramids.
@@handleonafridge6828I don’t know if he heard that they literally found boats that specifically moved the big bricks across river
The military just didn't leave the camera out there on a tripod.
You’re trying to talk sense to Rogan fanboys.
Yeah, I assume they put it under concrete with thick glass.
@@aceboogisback9946I don't think Rogan fan boys are set on this at all.
@@aceboogisback9946wtf does being a fan of Rogan have to do with his guest's opinions?
@@anony_mouse1the radiation would still damage the film
at some point it’s easier to just do the real thing than fake it
My favorite conspiracy theory is that they hired Kubrick to fake the moon landings, but he's such a perfectionist he made them shoot on location on the moon
So it’s easier to design the world most powerful weapon than to build a scaled model, set up a micro explosives and a massive fan? You sure?
@@kasparsbajarsthat's why it takes decades to build a really powerfull micro processors like we use today. Just because it's small doesn't mean that is easy to make.
Wrong
@@kasparsbajarsyup, that's what he's saying. Just let the moron talk.
"Oh my God, i never wondered how the camera survived. You must be telling the truth" --Dim Wit
The cameras were about 5 miles away in a reinforced housing with a very impressive zoom
Not impressive enough since it didn’t catch the car 😂
Telescopic zoom would distort the parallel lines. This isn’t happening.
@@dontworrybout2664some were close in the ground in cement doghouse with thick glass. They show you in documentaries.
@@dontworrybout2664they used 52 cameras man
THE CAR BRO! THE CAR! DON'T TELL ME IT WAS JUST THE BLINDSPOT OF THE LENS!
I love how Joe is easily convinced of something this week and then next week he'll have someone else with the opposite opinion, and then be convinced of that.
Yah not much of a thinker but boy do people follow him around like puppy dogs
He's not, he's allowing people to say their piece. He judges slowly which is good for hosting podcasts
Ooooooo boy you sure got 'im.
This guy believes nukes are real. He is just explaining a conspiracy theory that people believe in. Does explaining a conspiracy theory mean you believe it?
Can u say SUCKER😂
I’m sure the 55,000 servicemen who died of cancer from being exposed to the nuclear bomb tests don’t feel like they were fake
Tell that to people who threw sway their lithium prescriptions.
The cancer deaths came 💉... wake up
Did he say they were all fake? I don't believe he did.
@chigmeister1906 None of them were fake, all of them are recorded on multiple Richter scales in over twenty different countries. It's the same way we know when anybody detonates a nuclear device today, regardless of being underground or above.
The footage is fake but they clearly did real test
"How did they fake it?" "They just did." Well, that cleared up nothing professor.
right! lolol
Basically the camera that was filming the nuclear explosion couldn’t possibly survive the blasts that it supposedly recorded 😂
Mom i want hank schrader..
We have hank at home.
Hank at home... 😂
@@ssherrierableoh really? Tell me how thats impossible please.. ill wait. Its not like they meant it to survive a nuclear blast and just had some dude holding it. Fr how are you this dumb? Ot was shielded. You know like how all US military hardware is shielded.. they wenrt stupid like your comment.
@@ssherrierable couldn't possibly secure the camera in a hardened case
There is a feature on camera’s called “zoom”. When used it makes it look like you’re right next to what you’re filming. If this is video of the first test those camera’s are 10 Km from ground zero. They also placed cameras in lead boxes mounted to concrete bunkers. They also didn’t point the cameras at the explosions; they pointed them at mirrors that were facing the explosions from 10 Km away so the radiation didn’t destroy the film. Despite this, many cameras and their footage was still lost to the explosions.
thx
People in this comment section are like: "I see all these facts about cameras and nuclear physics but I'm gonna ignore them because my feelings come before facts". Imagine being so stupid that you think zoom lenses are a government conspiracy 😂😂😂
@@okayegg4597 You're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, huh? Ever heard of a jump cut? If you actually watch the original unedited footage, you'll find out that the first shot was several days before the actual bomb detonation, before they had moved everything into place. A day or two before the detonation they put the car there. It's really not that hard to figure out if you have a three-digit IQ.
@@jacobb7608 there is no need to be so rude. Can you not explain something that someone doesn’t understand in a respectful way.
@@jacobb7608 Hey, three--digits?
Wait: 100?
That's just the average....
_/\_
;-)
For those wondering about the camera explanation, they later described in the Joe Rogan podcast that it was done using mirrors, and the camera was actually very deep underground to protect the film from radioactive radiation and the blast itself
So I can just nuke-proof my house with mirrors? Phew
@@junkiedropouts3186 It worked like a submarine periscope. There was one mirror at the top angled to send the light down a shaft
@@asicdathens So why mirrors did not shake
@@junkiedropouts3186you have the iq of a fucking 5 year old and its honestly so embarrassing for humanity
@harleyquinn8202 Telescopic lenses vs time before the Shockwave hit camera position.
The camera housing was a great great of engineering in itself
Bro graduated from Mcdonald University 😭
This Videos are confirmed fakes u dmb useless human being
He is your teacher
Which year you paseed from that? Or you even failed that ?
@@tikooashish😂😂 you double roasted him.
shame you us
Right before a nuclear bomb
Blows up. It creates a plastic automobile. Everyone knows that....
Eddie Bravo was right...
On original video there is no automobile
😂😂
It's old film that was literally cut with scissors. So there was a starting FILM piece with no car and then the video with a car. They just cut the film. It's why there is no car for a split second. It's just ONE or TWO frames taken BEFORE the film was taken.
@@VolodymyrBurmistr
“How did they fake it”
“They just did”
Well as a film maker who studied under the wing of one of the oldest professors (dead now), who worked for Illuminatis/Hollywood/Nasa and more … We’ve been shown proofs that Nasa started as a film production to make Soviets waste money on Space Experiments so they can make them invest less in weapons to win the war, and it worked.
I thought the same thing until I did research on it…the camera was stabilized inside a super thick solid block of lead…this dude just got debunked LOL
They just did, yeah
The old "just trust me bro" 😂
@@PrlytheWn Ah yes, the hallmark of an intelligent person; being so gullible that you accept whatever people tell without any explanation or evidence.
They did not fake them at all my grandfather worked on these tests as a civilian engineer after his service in WW2. He worked for Lawrence Livermore Labs. He actually has photos he personally took of the detonations on the islands and many trips to the desert. I wouldn’t doubt that some was faked though, but definitely not all.
Share said pics
"They faked it" but doesn't answer how. We used to do atmospheric testing decades ago, so they didn't have to fake it.
It's literally all faked and you know it.
Or why they added a car in the stop motion for no reason to subtract from the credibility.
And how did we fake all the radiation and seismic activity that anybody could measure if properly equipped. Kodak accidentally found out about atomic testing when their film was partially exposed by radiation, but we faked the film of it. Nonsense.
He does answer, "they just did" got to be the way it was done obviously because he said it, he just did, you see how that works right?
This isn’t fake. You can put cameras in concrete bunkers that can withstand the blast at distance.
@kevindutton3676 I agree. Maybe it was filmed by a cockroach. Cockroaches and cameras are the only things that can survive a nuclear blast...
It is fake a concrete above ground bunker can’t survive a nuke
@@TrumpAManiaok i know its a joke but like
No insect survive a nuke blast, they are only ressistant to the radiation because the exoesqueleton....
Its like saying that Oil is made of dinossaurs
Not fake? did you see the appearing car? and the cameras were not in bunkers, they were on poles according to the government
@@arablues4142The exposure changes in that shot, the sky turns black from how much light there is, that scene is "dark"
it's so well documented how cameras were setup
where
Yea we’ll wait on it
Tell us.
@@JEUNGURA Try google. Concrete bunkers bulletproof glass facing away from the blast. The houses were made of wood. That guy on the podcast must be an idiot. No way to fake that in the 50's.
A couple minutes of searches will get you there boys, don’t be lazy, do your research.
Every conspiracy theorist’s go to “gotcha” line: Explain how the camera got there.
Me & every other rational person: You’re entirely to stupid to invest the time arguing with…
Brother, READ AGAIN WHAT YOU TYPED!
@@Nagi98 if your suggesting that by me stating, “You’re entirely to stupid to invest the time arguing with…” is thereby contradictory to the statement itself, I’d tell you that you must not have much of an understanding for context let alone syntax. The YT comment section under most videos you must find to be a really really boring place for you to read from w/ that razor thin, narrow mind of yours. There are some hilarious thoughts that ppl have out there in the world & personally, I find it special when someone shares that thought w/ the world, especially when it’s one that puts me in stitches. Now I get we all have differences in what we find humorous, but if you want to take everything serious then good for you! But, for the love of god don’t spoil everyone else’s fun & STFU! Thx 😊
@@OVRxNxOUT Like I said, R E AD A G A I N W H A T Y O U W R O T
I see you like to laugh reading coments let me tell you a joke, imagine ,people thinking, in 1955, they made BUNKERS, wich are UNDERGROUND shelters, to make a video recording of a nuke exploding....ABOVE GROUND...with remote camera tech wich was invented in 1962...not only that, people are wiling to die on that hill too...gets me every time, a real knee slaper this one, oh boy, let me tell you.
Man in the 21st century learns what zoom is
Same thing with the moon landing!!
Zoom with that high zoom distance and resolution??, for that time that would be the resolution of a regular distanced camera, so that just wouldn't work, and that still doesn't mask the fact of the car appearing in the background.
(joke)
@@ThanoSaltare u serius? Its optical zoom, it dosent affect quality
So no your wrong! Bc telescopes aren't real and made by the government and so are bad cameras (joke)
@@Saabpatrioten mb it was a joke but i didn't get to specify
The cameras fine because it was in a 4-ft thick concrete bunker with 4 in of reinforced glass
Uh huh...
@@snaphaan5049 How is that any less of an explenation than, "Hur hur i cant think of how they would protect a camera so it must have to exploded too duh!" with zero evedence.
Not only that but they used telescopic lenses for the close ups. Do people really think the cameras are anywhere within the vicinity of those structures toppling over??
@@AlexJasso100seriously. It takes a bit for the shockwave to hit at the distance the cameras were at. Plenty of time to film the explosion from a distance and cut before the wave hits.
@@AlexJasso100 I guess this guys never heard of zooming.
It was a telephoto lens. My dad was there. Worked as a design engineer. He actually desinged that camera and wS behind 20 layers of plexiglass. Town was constructed for the test. Dad worked at test site. Had 5 cancers. My BIL had silicosis from radioactive sand on the test site. This guy's a nut.
S the F up ... Trying to get some attention? Congrats you got mine !
Bro, if your dad really was on the project God Bless him, he helped save the lives of possibly a million brave Americans and at least as many or more brave Japanese soldiers.
My grandfather got to go see a nuke test when he was in the Marines in the 50s or 60s out in Vegas
wow thats crazy man i came on your dad ass
this is so obvious yet Rogan somehow is clueless like we never heard of those
It's actually funny how even though this COULD be fake, the fact still remains that this is what they're focused on.
Sometimes, Joe's enthusiasm overwhelms his common sense.
operative word: "sometimes"
I don't see how that applies here...
He couldnt explain it instantly so it was a compelling arguement. They tell us our phones are way better cameras than what we had in the past and nothing would ever look that clear from so far, so the avg person would believe this arguement easily.
Joe makes his money off of only thinking so hard about anything. In this case he missed:
Can people make bunkers?
Can the folks who design a bomb hire someone to build a shelter to withstand it?
Could this all have been faked?
The answer to all of that is "yes", and Joe chooses the most interesting possibility because he's a curious guy who has never conducted a rigorous experiment in his life. Nothing wrong with it, just not a good benchmark for objectivity.
It’s called a zoom lens in a protected bunker😂😂😂
Can’t explain the car appearing out of no where bud.
How far away?
@@boosthub3143it could just be two shots cut together with no transition.
@@boosthub3143video may have been cut between having the building sit there and the car being put next to it.
@@boosthub3143They decided to add the car at the last minute. It's called an edited clip genius. Dont be a bozo conspiratard
One day joes gonna have a conspiracy theorist that just denies that ww2 happened
my wife does thxs gab!!!!!!
@@jesusfreak3587ww2 ?
Maybe some things were massively exaggerated, at best utter propaganda at worst.
@@jesusfreak3587huge red flags. Get out while you can
If someone tries denying that then they run foul of the law because they would be denying something else happened
@@jesusfreak3587divorce her
Around 900 separate tests in Nevada alone stopped in 1992
Las Vegas used to advertise to tourists to "Come see the Giant Mushrooms" when a test would be going on.
“How’d they fake it”
“They just did”
💯
Trueeeee😂😂😂
Miniatute sets, napalm, and a zoomed in camera? You realize that it isn't hard to fake nuclear explosions.
CGI, and Practical Effects exist.
Because science
Best argument ever...lol
Eddie tried to tell Joe this exact thing and he shut Eddie up.
its how you present the context. Eddie is way too passionate it’s blinding.
Came here to say that
@@Bmh26Win your a wise human😉👽🛸
Because Eddie is dumb, but he is obviously dumb. This guy is also dumb but he presents himself as not dumb.
The cameras were just far away and in a secure area. You know, the same way we film literally everything dangerous ever. Or did you guys think vulcano clips are filmed right next to the eruption instead of extremely far away but zoomed in?
The car situation is just a matter of time. The explosion happend at night, so they used footage of the house during day as a sort of "before and after".
I didn’t have to scroll down to far to find this. I was going to say, “Edgie Brah has entered the chat.”
My father died from the exposure to the radiation at the test site, hence the name. A lot of the men in there valley have, because that’s where you worked. Those videos are very real a lot of families lived very close to them.
You're confusing things. The videos are fake. They did run real tests but they needed footage to leak to the Russians to make them see US superiority before the summit during WWII.
My grandpa died before i was born from cancer. He would fly planes into the area after the tests to get atmospheric data. The government denied responsibility until about 10 or so years ago, and gave my grandma a whopping 75k.
Let the Alex Jones wannabe have his moment 😂
Same story goes with Russians. Something that can't be hidden. Many dead.
Hence what name? Father? Radiation?
If a cameraman can survive over 2 hrs Filming Nemo underwater, you bet it can survive a nuclear explosion
His source is “trust me bro”
All the schizophrenics who think this is fake *literally* think someone saying "yeah trust me" is credible evidence. I suppose you have to work with what you can when you can't understand basic statistics or scientific studies.
the car…
How original
his source is comin directly from the moon camera man
Bro needs a source for something he sees with his own eyes. I swear you can herd people off a cliff today, if you make a "source"
These guys are going to lose their minds when they discover zoom.
its not zoomed. it IS fake footage.
@@philindeblanckeep telling yourself that. This guy only has distracting questions with no explanations. You've been convinced by a disinform specialist. Exactly who Russia and China want you to believe.
I did nt listen to the guy. I watched the video in full length and slow motion. its FAKE.@@mattmarzula
@@mattmarzula explain the car then...
How old are you??? They didn't have internet back then
The camera was in a concrete bunker facing from blast, designed to withstand intact.
The later footage was spliced. The before footage shot of just of the house. The blast footage started after final staging including a car. No conspiracy, no mystery.
Thank you! I'm glad you use logical, independent thinking to counter this misinformation.
That kind of sloppiness with the car is a great way to discredit oneself. I don’t buy it if your goal is to intimidate during a war situation.
There’s a clear cut where the car appears, it’s obviously put there after that cut, fucking Joe doesn’t question ANYTHING. He eats conspiracy theories
@@someguyusathis was from the 40's, way before everyone and there mother thought they were experts about everything because they googled there opinion and only tried to find stuff to support it.
The full video also has a camera inside the house. Hmm ok
1. Idk if you’ve heard about it, but there exists something called concrete bunkers. 2. The camera was mechanical, not electrical. 3. Have you heard of film splicing???
When you bring two brain cells to a 10 brain cell fight
@amatthewdouglascraigdiscov1876 So are you saying that Hiroshima didn't experience a nuclear detonation dropped by the United States? Cuz you're either saying that or you're saying that the US had a completely untested bomb that they were going to drop on a city half way around the world. You're also possibly saying that telescopic cameras don't exist or that the government can't afford them... Both of those are preposterous as well. The government lies a a lot for sure though.
Maybe you need better comprehension skills. He said the videos and testing are fake to show their powers. Not the bombs are fake.
Joe would be totally lose his mind when he find out what zoom in camera meant
he would lose it when he learned about cameras.
@@raynjpg "no amount of zoom would keep a camera out of the zone of the bomb" that makes zero sense ... how far do you think a shock-wave travels?
"that clip where the car randomly appears is pretty damning." It's just a video taken before, and the explosion video edited together, the car was moved inbetween shots. The same camera settings are not going to work for both situations.... it's pretty simple stuff.
There are video footage from inside the houses, explain that please
Most are so willing to just say, crazy conspiracy without even taking a 2nd look
@@raynjpg 2 things.
1) We have had the ability to zoom in on the moon to 600x magnification for at least a lifetime before these were tested, probably more than a century. Easily able to record video from miles and miles away.
2) The car situation does seem weird, until you remember that film was expensive and not digital. You would have tested the camera ahead of time, then started it back up later. From the time when they started it to the time when they recorded the blast, someone put a car there.
If you were going to fake it to scare the Russians, you wouldn't fuck up and magically put a car in the scene.
These men are a prime example why good schools and good high quality education is important for any nation.
that, plus how dangerous the internet is, as it gives any bloody fool a platform. and then other dimwits join them and they convince themselves that they have it all figured out.
dude, they make these people famous and popular, and reward them with so much money they don't even know how to spend
Well i can understand people dont believe anything if you see how much they lied. Ever seen the rat/mouse on mars? you can see it on nasa own pics.
What is the education of these two individuals?
@@americarocks1776 Education dones measure how smart someone is but more how indoctrinated. Personally i see smart more as how you fix a problem then i can repeat whatever they told me.
Stoned Joe Rogan having his mind blown is a whole mood....🔥
Gay
"how did they fake it?"
"They just did, yeah"
Wow, I'm convinced...
When something is clearly fake the "how" isn't particularly important; first of all people should acknowledge that it was very clearly ans obviously faked, only then should you start asking questions like "how?".
@@outisnemo8443you need evidence either way
@@outisnemo8443 if only there were materials that were stronger than wooden houses with weatherboard siding... Like, some kind of liquid stone that could be poured and fortified with stronger materials again like steel... And then a thick sheet of something dense to stop the radiation, but we all know that lead doesn't exist...
@@bradstone2603with you, the joke really is on them, did they think the bomb was dropped 2 feet away the bomb was set mile or 2 and in those days you could watch the bombs going off from Vegas the rich n famous would go out and watch it
@@outisnemo8443there is no evidence of it being faked. In fact with what we know about nuclear explosions, this is very much how it looks like and how it would be done if you want the camera survived. Even funnier is that there is clear evidence of them testing the bombs in Nevada and multiple other places around the world.