Quit lying. Hyper x sounds like ur talking through the mic on my razer head set. People only notice the quality when I'm using the blue yeti with virtual XLR plug in and OBS eq with a noise gate.
Quadcast feels much more natural and organic, Blue yeti you can actually hear the compression and pre-EQ applied to it. The average listener might find yeti captures a better range, but Imo it's better to have things RAW and apply compressor / EQ post, because if it's already applied you can't undo it. It's like having a selfie camera that always has smoothening / beauty filters applied, you'd have to basically try to edit out the effect to try to get it to feel natural again. Ps. This is one of the best reviews out there. This guy went straight into the details. I find that people who make mic reviews like the sound of their voice too much and just end up rambling, trying to make witty jokes, and going off too many tangents. Really appreciate this.
@FillaWolf it all depends on edits but in this video you can hear the tiny sound of the blue yeti and it's disgusting. The hyper comes already warm and crisp while the yeti sounds like a headset mic out of the box. It's all plug n play with these usb mics and hyperx takes the win there
One thing to know about the Yeti: It's not living up to its full potential straight out of the box. It needs a shock mount. It needs a pop filter. It helps a LOT to acoustically treat your room (which is true for every mic)
I find that the yeti works way better when you’re hanging it upside down instead of straight up, and, you definitely want to get a shock mount for it. Just my two cents
@@mcant17 i honestly fucking hate the blue yeti if any of you are thinking of getting it dont ive been having non stop issues returning it honestly its just been hell
@@Anthony0855 thats your problem. you either got sent a broken one or you broke it yourself. i have been using mine since it release and never had any issues... just take care of your gear and you wont need to trade it.
I found myself clicking back and forth between the two to listen to the difference. The Quadcast definitely sounds better. It's not as...sharp. The sound quality seems to be a bit richer. I'm really glad Dave did this video.
ive had the same yeti for a few years now. i have zero complaints. hearing other mics side by side really make me happy i chose it. im not an audio pro, so it works really well for me. im the target audience for a quality usb mic, and the blackout yeti is wonderful. the stand is in fact chonk though. ill give you that.
Don’t know how you’ve managed that 😂. I got my yeti a few weeks after Christmas and it broke two weeks ago (the cheap plastic in the charger cable). I’ve had to resort into buying an new mic because of it
@@Oliveralford a cable is replaceable, why would you replace the entire mic for whats clearly a bad cable? gotta uneerstand that usb cables are a wear item when youre plugging them in frequently vs leaving it plugged in and immobilized.
@@Oliveralford it became clear to me after i wrote that comment that the quality tanked when Logitech bought blue. I have one pre-buyout so thats likely the explanation.
The Blue Yeti USB Mic is so good I was thinking about getting the hyperx but now I like the Blue Yeti USB Mic way more Thank you for uploading this video
But they are in the same price range. The yeti is a 12 year old mic (give or take a few revisions) but isn't priced as such. A lot of new content creators/streamer go for the Yeti because of its reputation when in fact its by far not the best mic out there for the price
@@Oldmangamess I agree, it has changed a lot but the Yeti mic isn't priced as such. Just got my daughter full USB microphone kit (mic, boom arm, shock mount, pop filter) all for under £80 that out performs the my old Yeti. The point is that the comparison is between 2 popular mics at the similar price point. The review clearly highlights that the established Yeti mic is not worthwhile value to performance purchase
I've ordered the QuadCast S and am waiting impatiently for it to get shipped from the store I ordered it from, and every video I see about it gets me more and more hyped. Thank you for the in depth review!
Now that some time has past... how do you like the QuadCast S? And would you make the same purchase again, if yiu could go back? Ps did yoy get a arm bar for the QuadCast S?
@@sluggztube i got mine and im loving it . the only problem i have is i like mechanical keyboards so im had to do a lot of research to get rid of the clacks . and i agree that a boom arm is a must ..... luckily i picked mine up off amazon for less than $20 and it works great
@@yoremi7686 its alright been using it for the last couple of years you can def eq it to sound decent but it is not worth buyin it is too expensive for what it offers.
@@Baytuh yes man and if your budget is a bit tight go for yeti pro. I have quadcast, yeti,sm7b and yeti pro in which yeti pro is the best in high sound but for low sound sm7b is the winner
Finally, someone who says what type of microswitches they have on their keyboard to give a good indication as to what can be expected with yours. Too many people just slam their keyboards and say "this is how it sounds typing". Well done.
I really still dont know what to choose. Cause the Blue yeti looks so clean on your setup and i think its a more warmer sound but the hyper x quadcast is amazing too. If someone could help i would apreciate it!
I bought the Blue Yeti (white) too, I agree that it really nice and clear for the set up, but in my opinion, if can you should test it first because the blue voice in G-hub (i dont really remember that app name) makes my voice like I’m talking under water in some options xD but now I’m use the Nvidia Soundboard (free) and It better. Hope you find a good mic for you :3
I can't tell if you re posted a bigger channels video 🤔 or if you're actually making quality videos with great editing and mixing. Top tier video for sure 👌
I’m a fan of both, however I own the Yeti. I do believe you can get little caps to put in the holes where the stand was, I’d have to look again though.
The yeti definitely has more body to the sound and higher quality, the quadcast is more soul less (not to the point of having a very high difference in quality tho) but to compensate it has a shockmount and a pop filter already integrated so you are gonna waste less money to make it functional compared to the yeti that you need a arm and a pop filter.
I agree, I might have to just stick to the blue yeti x when I upgrade from my blue yeti. I really do enjoy the mute button on the quadcast because it seems to work better and not break as often. I'm actually upgrading my blue yeti because the mic button no longer works. It doesn't mute me when I push the button. (It blinks its lights indicating it should be muted, but it's not.)
@@ghost-user559 I have the yeti and I gifted my nephew the quadcast. I really do think the yeti has better out the box audio, but the quadcast does have nifty features. Funny you replied so quick, I changed my mind about the blue yeti x, I'm gonna just by the quadcast for a few reasons. I do VC with friends a lot and i do use the mute button frequently so quadcast wins. Quadcast I do believe picks up less noise in general compared to the yeti. So while my voice won't sound as bassy or punchy, it'll do good not picking up background noise in my house. I can probably finetune the voice settings of the yeti with voicemeter banana or a different sound program on my PC to be perfect for me. Plus it's like $96 at my local bestbuy and on amazon so.
@@yourfavoriteMex Check out the Fifine K658 if you are trying to cut back on background sounds and you want a really nice mute button. Just a slight touch and it’s instant with no feedback. It’s a dynamic so it’s much better on background noise than a condenser like the Yeti or Quadcast. But Quadcast would probably be the most “natural” sound. The Fifine sounds a little bit more “podcast” or “radio”, but it’s very good for the price if background noise is an issue.
I use the Yeti Nano which mediates the size problem quite a bit without compromising on sound quality I also tend to have it mounted sideways on an arm, as in like, the holes where the mic screws into the default desk mount are pointing up and down and I find this helps even further with the size problem. It might look weird at first but you kind of just get used to it once you use it a bit
You cannot talk about Hyper X without bringing up the fact that the Hyper X just stops working after about a month of using it. The audio quality just goes to tr s, and I've had at least 5 of them in the past 6 months. My last mic before Hyper X, I used for over 5 years.
I mean it is an amazing mic but at its price 140$ it isn't worth it at all you could get your self an xlr mic that would sound way better for that price point
@@iceyyy8146 No you can pick up a nice audio interface the BEHRINGER Audio Interface for only 45 dollars and it would still sound better with than the quadcast
Which would you preferably suggest for recording music? I am leaning towards the Hyper X Quadcast I appreciate the functionality you went in on but when you mentioned the headphone attachment/volume control I don’t know how essential this would be for a recording music
Blue yeti will be a lot better if you aren't on a windows computer, but if you are I suggest that. But if your on MacOS like me and on PS5 I suggest the blue yeti x
I've seen a few people with this issue im not sure its common but with the blue yeti, after awhile if you just jolt it a little bit it seems to cut the headphones off. (again im not sure if its common but its a problem a lot of people and me have).
I got the yeti nano and I am not very pleased. It picks up background noise like crazy but not my voice, and when I bring it close the noise levels vary wildly. I am not a good speaker but this is not very good quality at all as far as I am concerned. It seems you need to shout from close range to get good volume without tons of bg noise. I wish I had the quadcaster instead but I did not want to buy online and this was the best in store option I could find.
You can’t compare a mic that’s meant for voiceovers to mic for streaming, you don’t like the yeti for streaming but at the same time it’s a condenser microphone which usually isn’t meant for streaming
I like the sound from Yeti slightly more, but I think there's noticeably higher % of manufacturing defects / durability problems on them. Seems that QuadCast is better in that front.
@@MidnightPodcast Would be helpful if you provided at least some references along with your claim. LUL I'm not saying you are necessarily wrong, but simple "No." is pretty useless.
@@MidnightPodcast With mics as well as pretty much all audio equipment the "better" sound quality is highly matter of personal taste. (I have been professional audio product designer and setup designer over 20 years.) That's why I wrote: "I like the sound from Yeti slightly more..." and not that "Yeti has a better sound quality".
The only thing you can tell is that you can't hear them, you don't know if the mic is muted, or it's a connection problem, a glitch, could be anything.
The Quadcast looks way better than the Yeti imo but the software for the Yeti is far superior than the Quadcast. Way more control. Something to research before you make your choice.
I recommend stereo for discord if a lot if people are talking because you can be in places in speakers where other are not and normal people are in the middle but your wide out.
I'm a total audio novice so various settings and accessories really mean nothing to me yet. As he is using them, the Hyper X sounds better than the Yeti to me but only just.
I’m looking for a mic that will pick up clear audio between 4 people sitting around a table so something with wide range capability, Ive heard that the Blue Yeti is ideal for that but I like the sound of the Quadcast more and was just curious if it would also be good for wide range like the Blue Yeti if any of y’all had any answer or suggestions
my friend has been looking for a mic for like ever so i think im going to recommend hum the quadcast. it has a much nice look to it and the audio sounds a lot crisper on it the the yeti
Both of these mics have fantastic audio quality, surely he's using some filters on these on top of the regular mic? I doubt the vocal quality for streams will be that good just using the mic alone, no?
I have the quadcast and its really that good... It's almost ridiculous. You just need to use the right setting, the right amount of gain and talk about 20 - 30 cm away from the mic.
3:01 Cardioid Test for Hyper X vs 8:46 Cardioid Test Blue Yeti
Appreciate it
Respect. Thx man!
i love you
one year later, I’m here to thank you too
Don't you think Yeti is little better to capture audio?
The hyperx is such an amazing mic, every time I play a co op game ppl notice the high quality sound of the mic
Too bad both of them are very sensitive and can pick up background noise easily. Especially the HyperX Quadcast. Had to sell that one
@@clockspacefilms3025 I don't see any reviewers ever speaking about this. Is it really that bad? what do you recommend in its place?
do you have any sort of sound card ?
@@clockspacefilms3025 You just gotta use the right setting and the right amount of gain
Quit lying. Hyper x sounds like ur talking through the mic on my razer head set. People only notice the quality when I'm using the blue yeti with virtual XLR plug in and OBS eq with a noise gate.
Quadcast feels much more natural and organic, Blue yeti you can actually hear the compression and pre-EQ applied to it. The average listener might find yeti captures a better range, but Imo it's better to have things RAW and apply compressor / EQ post, because if it's already applied you can't undo it. It's like having a selfie camera that always has smoothening / beauty filters applied, you'd have to basically try to edit out the effect to try to get it to feel natural again.
Ps. This is one of the best reviews out there. This guy went straight into the details. I find that people who make mic reviews like the sound of their voice too much and just end up rambling, trying to make witty jokes, and going off too many tangents. Really appreciate this.
Quadcast seems a lot better.
It already has a mic spider and a integrated pop filter.
Warmer sound and it looks better.
4/5 years different
@H2OWATER opinions
@FillaWolf it all depends on edits but in this video you can hear the tiny sound of the blue yeti and it's disgusting. The hyper comes already warm and crisp while the yeti sounds like a headset mic out of the box. It's all plug n play with these usb mics and hyperx takes the win there
@FillaWolf i cant trust anyone that cant spell which correctly lmao jk
@Basic omen87 typing fast doesn't make you spell the wrong "which" is you spell fast you might accidentally type "whch" or "wich" not "witch"
One thing to know about the Yeti: It's not living up to its full potential straight out of the box. It needs a shock mount. It needs a pop filter. It helps a LOT to acoustically treat your room (which is true for every mic)
Neither mic is in this case with the Yeti actually being cheaper.
@@jaronmarles941 nah its more expensive actually
@@hairold5680 No it isn't
$40 cheaper
@@hairold5680 No you aren't
$100 for the Yeti, and $140 for the Quadcast
I was about to buy this mic for a particular feature, but then this video taught me that my current mic also has the same feature. Im dumb,
lol what was the feature
@@she1k that Stereo setting lol
What is the mic you’re about to buy?😂
@@JPeoplzOIII yes that's exactly why i want to buy one of these two. I just want it to surprise my friends tho😂. Which one do you have?
@@re-gaming3913 its a Blue Yeti. Had it forever and it hasnt let me down. Knock on wood
I find that the yeti works way better when you’re hanging it upside down instead of straight up, and, you definitely want to get a shock mount for it. Just my two cents
I think you could hang the quadcast upside down if I'm not wrong. Because i remember people using it like that. I'll have to double check.
@jack 1122 yeah I think you just need the right adapter for it
@@mcant17 i honestly fucking hate the blue yeti if any of you are thinking of getting it dont ive been having non stop issues returning it honestly its just been hell
@@Anthony0855 thats your problem. you either got sent a broken one or you broke it yourself. i have been using mine since it release and never had any issues... just take care of your gear and you wont need to trade it.
@@inutero3516 not really they sent out another one and it wasnt working too
I found myself clicking back and forth between the two to listen to the difference.
The Quadcast definitely sounds better. It's not as...sharp.
The sound quality seems to be a bit richer.
I'm really glad Dave did this video.
ive had the same yeti for a few years now. i have zero complaints. hearing other mics side by side really make me happy i chose it. im not an audio pro, so it works really well for me. im the target audience for a quality usb mic, and the blackout yeti is wonderful. the stand is in fact chonk though. ill give you that.
Don’t know how you’ve managed that 😂. I got my yeti a few weeks after Christmas and it broke two weeks ago (the cheap plastic in the charger cable). I’ve had to resort into buying an new mic because of it
@@Oliveralford a cable is replaceable, why would you replace the entire mic for whats clearly a bad cable? gotta uneerstand that usb cables are a wear item when youre plugging them in frequently vs leaving it plugged in and immobilized.
@@BenFilley it was the part in the mic
@@Oliveralford it became clear to me after i wrote that comment that the quality tanked when Logitech bought blue. I have one pre-buyout so thats likely the explanation.
I was getting a hyper X and this really got me on board and not so unsure thanks Dave!
did you end up getting it ? if you did , was it good because im thinking of getting one
@@blabberz8430 i have one sounds good if u have a nvidia gpu download rtx voice takes care of back up noise.
@@AprilSamurai thanks dawg for the tip!
The Blue Yeti USB Mic is so good I was thinking about getting the hyperx but now I like the Blue Yeti USB Mic way more Thank you for uploading this video
i'm so glad i'm not the only one who remembers simply red XD
I love comparing a 12 year old and a year old microphone against each other
But they are in the same price range. The yeti is a 12 year old mic (give or take a few revisions) but isn't priced as such. A lot of new content creators/streamer go for the Yeti because of its reputation when in fact its by far not the best mic out there for the price
@@TheBatNaz Even still technology has changed a lot the past 12 years and it gives the blue yeti a clear disadvantage
@@Oldmangamess I agree, it has changed a lot but the Yeti mic isn't priced as such. Just got my daughter full USB microphone kit (mic, boom arm, shock mount, pop filter) all for under £80 that out performs the my old Yeti. The point is that the comparison is between 2 popular mics at the similar price point. The review clearly highlights that the established Yeti mic is not worthwhile value to performance purchase
Don’t get butt hurt honey
Why buy a 12 year old mic when you can get a modern one that's just as good for the same price
The Yeti definitely needs a pop filter.
Suggestion?
I throw my furry trapper hat over the top.
But, it’s a really good mic.
I've ordered the QuadCast S and am waiting impatiently for it to get shipped from the store I ordered it from, and every video I see about it gets me more and more hyped. Thank you for the in depth review!
Now that some time has past... how do you like the QuadCast S?
And would you make the same purchase again, if yiu could go back?
Ps did yoy get a arm bar for the QuadCast S?
@@sluggztube i got mine and im loving it . the only problem i have is i like mechanical keyboards so im had to do a lot of research to get rid of the clacks . and i agree that a boom arm is a must ..... luckily i picked mine up off amazon for less than $20 and it works great
For the yeti, and using discord, my friends can’t hear anything when I use cardioid and sound suppression. Just got it today, works wonders!
Is the blue yeti good?
@@yoremi7686 its alright been using it for the last couple of years you can def eq it to sound decent but it is not worth buyin it is too expensive for what it offers.
@@AprilSamurai what do you suggest then?
This video was so helpful. I got the Blue Yeti as a gift but going to return it for the HyperX. Love the warmer sound of the HyperX way more.
bro, just give it back to me then
blue yeti is better than quadcast ngl
@@TheJapGuyFreaksOut lol same
I've had my blue yeti that i use for my videos for about 8yrs now, it works most of the time but its time for me to get an upgrade.
Hyper x quadcast
This hyper X would not be upgrade
Get shure sm7b
@@nandubhaskaran if i get the money i will.
@@Baytuh yes man and if your budget is a bit tight go for yeti pro. I have quadcast, yeti,sm7b and yeti pro in which yeti pro is the best in high sound but for low sound sm7b is the winner
Blue yeti sounds better for me. I got one last yeah and I’m very happy with it
The far away gain test killed me lmao, awesome video man.
The Yeti looks better in my opinion compared to the Hyper X one... I like the minimalistic look instead of the red gamery look...
ya the full rgb one is so much better cause u can just pick the look but its out of stock everywhere
You can get the quad cast s for 10dollars more that can completely control rgb
Finally, someone who says what type of microswitches they have on their keyboard to give a good indication as to what can be expected with yours. Too many people just slam their keyboards and say "this is how it sounds typing". Well done.
I really still dont know what to choose. Cause the Blue yeti looks so clean on your setup and i think its a more warmer sound but the hyper x quadcast is amazing too. If someone could help i would apreciate it!
i just chose the blue yeti :)
I bought the Blue Yeti (white) too, I agree that it really nice and clear for the set up, but in my opinion, if can you should test it first because the blue voice in G-hub (i dont really remember that app name) makes my voice like I’m talking under water in some options xD but now I’m use the Nvidia Soundboard (free) and It better. Hope you find a good mic for you :3
@@yenphitruong8689 nvidia is great for adjusting your mic volume. simple and easy to use, i recommend it as well
Have you tested the Sound of the keystrokes with RTX voice on?
i tried both this weekend. kept the yeti. returned the hyper x. for me, i found my voice was richer, clearer, cleaner on the yeti. =)
Could have tried turning down the gain or changing it to stereo
@@hd5783 yeti would still beat it, it’s audio quality is known to be better
@@alano6189 did u not watch the mic test?
@@hd5783 it sounds different for every single person who speaks into the mic, due to the differences in voice
@@PyroAceros I’ve already watched a ton of sound test, the quadcast is better in every one
What cheapboom arm options are there for the HyperX? And any video on how to properly set it up?
I like the quadcast as it has more bass than the yeti, its less sharp and doesnt hurt in the ear.
Just bought the hyper x thanks to this video! Thanks man! Big help! A lot of info and video doesn’t drag 👏
What an excellent presentation of the two microphones. Thank you.
Got the blue yeti first right, decided it wasn't for me then went with the quadcast and have been happy ever since.
Thank you very much for this info. Very informative and gave me new insight on my mic purchase.
Thanks for the sound demo. Blue yeti sounds significantly better. Quite a big difference for my ear.
Sometimes.
I can't tell if you re posted a bigger channels video 🤔 or if you're actually making quality videos with great editing and mixing. Top tier video for sure 👌
This channel has 5 mil subscribers
@@therealaccee oh ur right. I thought it said 4.5 thousand. Didn't notice the M haha 😆
@@ShiftyRightNow haha lol
I’m a fan of both, however I own the Yeti. I do believe you can get little caps to put in the holes where the stand was, I’d have to look again though.
Yes you can
The yeti definitely has more body to the sound and higher quality, the quadcast is more soul less (not to the point of having a very high difference in quality tho) but to compensate it has a shockmount and a pop filter already integrated so you are gonna waste less money to make it functional compared to the yeti that you need a arm and a pop filter.
Which one do you have?
I agree, I might have to just stick to the blue yeti x when I upgrade from my blue yeti. I really do enjoy the mute button on the quadcast because it seems to work better and not break as often. I'm actually upgrading my blue yeti because the mic button no longer works. It doesn't mute me when I push the button. (It blinks its lights indicating it should be muted, but it's not.)
@@yourfavoriteMex Do you have both the Quadcast and the Yeti?
@@ghost-user559 I have the yeti and I gifted my nephew the quadcast. I really do think the yeti has better out the box audio, but the quadcast does have nifty features. Funny you replied so quick, I changed my mind about the blue yeti x, I'm gonna just by the quadcast for a few reasons. I do VC with friends a lot and i do use the mute button frequently so quadcast wins. Quadcast I do believe picks up less noise in general compared to the yeti. So while my voice won't sound as bassy or punchy, it'll do good not picking up background noise in my house. I can probably finetune the voice settings of the yeti with voicemeter banana or a different sound program on my PC to be perfect for me. Plus it's like $96 at my local bestbuy and on amazon so.
@@yourfavoriteMex Check out the Fifine K658 if you are trying to cut back on background sounds and you want a really nice mute button. Just a slight touch and it’s instant with no feedback.
It’s a dynamic so it’s much better on background noise than a condenser like the Yeti or Quadcast. But Quadcast would probably be the most “natural” sound. The Fifine sounds a little bit more “podcast” or “radio”, but it’s very good for the price if background noise is an issue.
I use the Yeti Nano which mediates the size problem quite a bit without compromising on sound quality
I also tend to have it mounted sideways on an arm, as in like, the holes where the mic screws into the default desk mount are pointing up and down and I find this helps even further with the size problem. It might look weird at first but you kind of just get used to it once you use it a bit
i have the same mic. I want to start a podcast using the mic with multiple people. Any tips and best settings to use?
great video, Dave J
Really really useful for black Friday sales, Thank you so much.
That‘s why I came here! This guy is a godsent
bro legit that is the reason i clicked this video i ended up going with the quad cast because it was 20 dollars cheaper than the blue yeti
You cannot talk about Hyper X without bringing up the fact that the Hyper X just stops working after about a month of using it. The audio quality just goes to tr s, and I've had at least 5 of them in the past 6 months. My last mic before Hyper X, I used for over 5 years.
I have the blue yeti. It works just fine for my and I’m fond of it, it is a great mic
Thanks this was perfect for what I needed. I just used your link to kick some support your way. Well done on the video!
What boom arm are you using for the Hyperx Quadcast?
What boomarm do you have? I've been looking for one and yours looks great!
We gonna just ignore the fact that he juat smelled a mic that had a sock on it
11:24
The quadcast is an amazing mic! No complaints here! It's beautiful, durable, and amazing sound. Good review sir👍💯👏
I mean it is an amazing mic but at its price 140$ it isn't worth it at all you could get your self an xlr mic that would sound way better for that price point
@@blabberz8430 but then you’d need an audio interface which will cost you another $120 depending on which one you buy
@@iceyyy8146 No you can pick up a nice audio interface the BEHRINGER Audio Interface for only 45 dollars and it would still sound better with than the quadcast
@@blabberz8430 the quadcast costs like 90 dollars u must be talking abouit the quadcast s which ahs rgb and is not worth it
Which one u think would be better for recording music out of them 2 ?
got the quadcast s and a $20 boom . with that combo i love it
Just bought the hyperx mic, thanks for your help!
Yeti looks like a studio rap booth mic. Which I like and it sounds good get the extra stuff for it. Won’t disappoint 👏🏿
Nice one! Was thinking the blue yeti would be better for asmr, but now I might be leaning towards the quadcasr
What do you use for EQ settings or audio processing in these videos? Sounds really good!
Yeti all the way I prefer to utilize the volume knob for mic monitoring.
No.
Hyper X is the best microphone EVER.
No matter how old it is, It's insane how good it still is.
Boom Arm: 07/09/23 Which boom arm are you using on this clip, or do you recommend another, at this point?
Which would you preferably suggest for recording music? I am leaning towards the Hyper X Quadcast I appreciate the functionality you went in on but when you mentioned the headphone attachment/volume control I don’t know how essential this would be for a recording music
I dont like rgb or just red so imma stick with the Yeti (: great vid tho
i have a blue snowball should i upgrade to a hyper x?
Blue yeti will be a lot better if you aren't on a windows computer, but if you are I suggest that. But if your on MacOS like me and on PS5 I suggest the blue yeti x
I've seen a few people with this issue im not sure its common but with the blue yeti, after awhile if you just jolt it a little bit it seems to cut the headphones off. (again im not sure if its common but its a problem a lot of people and me have).
I got the yeti nano and I am not very pleased. It picks up background noise like crazy but not my voice, and when I bring it close the noise levels vary wildly. I am not a good speaker but this is not very good quality at all as far as I am concerned. It seems you need to shout from close range to get good volume without tons of bg noise. I wish I had the quadcaster instead but I did not want to buy online and this was the best in store option I could find.
Thought the yeti was much better sounding. Fuller, more intimate.
I just bought the hyperX because it is on sale for under 100, can't wait to try it!
Thanks for this vid! Friend wanted to start streaming and I wasn't sure which of these to get him. Choice is obvious, hyperx seems insanely good!
Great video!! Helped sooo much in the decision making!
You can’t compare a mic that’s meant for voiceovers to mic for streaming, you don’t like the yeti for streaming but at the same time it’s a condenser microphone which usually isn’t meant for streaming
The thing I don't like in the QuadCast is the light, I wished it was less intense and that it was possible to turn it off.
I like the sound from Yeti slightly more, but I think there's noticeably higher % of manufacturing defects / durability problems on them. Seems that QuadCast is better in that front.
No.
@@MidnightPodcast Would be helpful if you provided at least some references along with your claim. LUL
I'm not saying you are necessarily wrong, but simple "No." is pretty useless.
@@tkermi The HyperX is better.
@@MidnightPodcast With mics as well as pretty much all audio equipment the "better" sound quality is highly matter of personal taste. (I have been professional audio product designer and setup designer over 20 years.) That's why I wrote: "I like the sound from Yeti slightly more..." and not that "Yeti has a better sound quality".
@@tkermi You're allowed to have an opinion, but you're wrong.
had the blue yeti for years you convinced me to check out hyper x. My blue yeti is doing weird feedback noises. So I'm going to check hyper x.
How is the hyper? I'm new to this
@@Nova9_9 I like it no complaints
"your stream can see your mic is muted" well no shit im pretty sure they could tell by the fact they cant hear you talking
The only thing you can tell is that you can't hear them, you don't know if the mic is muted, or it's a connection problem, a glitch, could be anything.
In this video did you do any editing to the hyperx quadcast with something like voice meeter but if you did please do a showcase
The Quadcast looks way better than the Yeti imo but the software for the Yeti is far superior than the Quadcast. Way more control. Something to research before you make your choice.
what software?
No.
witch one should I buy?
The audio quality through headphones from the HyperX seemed better than the Yeti. Is it just me or has that been everyone’s experience…?
Ty this was very helpful 😊
I recommend stereo for discord if a lot if people are talking because you can be in places in speakers where other are not and normal people are in the middle but your wide out.
It's insane how good the quality is for this price!
I'm a total audio novice so various settings and accessories really mean nothing to me yet. As he is using them, the Hyper X sounds better than the Yeti to me but only just.
The Elgato Wave 1 & 3 are cheaper than the yeti and are much better mics options.
No one mentions the Audio Technica At2020 USB+, which is an awesome mic.
Fifine
I was excited to see this video because my brother has that same blue yeti and I have a quadcast s
What time I was actually looking for a new mic the hyper X quad cast S maybe the one I’m getting
I’m looking for a mic that will pick up clear audio between 4 people sitting around a table so something with wide range capability, Ive heard that the Blue Yeti is ideal for that but I like the sound of the Quadcast more and was just curious if it would also be good for wide range like the Blue Yeti if any of y’all had any answer or suggestions
Did you end up buying the quadcast?
Hi, i just bought a Hyper X Quadcast S microphone but i dont know what stand do i have to buy. Any recommendations?
my friend has been looking for a mic for like ever so i think im going to recommend hum the quadcast. it has a much nice look to it and the audio sounds a lot crisper on it the the yeti
Getting it next week or Friday. Super excited!
Which one
@@ArelloYT hyperx
How is it?
@@razo5557 i have it, it's solid the voice quality is decent but the features are even better.
Which one do you recommend?
i reccomend the blue yeti
I recommend the blue yeti as well
Hi. Compared to Audio Technica ATR2500x-UBS, which one is better in sound quality and noise cancellation?
the audio technica
Both of these mics have fantastic audio quality, surely he's using some filters on these on top of the regular mic? I doubt the vocal quality for streams will be that good just using the mic alone, no?
I have the quadcast and its really that good... It's almost ridiculous. You just need to use the right setting, the right amount of gain and talk about 20 - 30 cm away from the mic.
@@hover6662 What settings would you recommend.
@@hover6662 im thinking of getting the quad cast. what gain level and windows gain settings do you recommend for the best possible sound
@@hover6662 what settings are good?
@@hover6662 what are your recommendations?
ty for the review to me the blue yeti sounds crisper and a little louder which i like so ty
No.
it’s great to here thst the quad cast is better than my blue yeti when i got it for chrismas and now i want to blow the money to get a quad cast
Great reviews, very well done
I was about to buy a new mic but realized that I mounted my blue yeti backwards and it’s been like that for a year 💀
This was soooo useful thankkkk you so much...
What kind of stand for the mic you're using?!
Perfect timing with this I really need something more professional that won't break the bank...thank you!😊
the Hyper X Quadcast was 600 dollars for me
I find the elgato wave 3 being way better than either of these because of the super customizeable software. Still a great video tho.
Can I ask please which of two are good for asmr sounds? Blue yeti or hyperx? Thanks
The ASMR part cracked me up haha
A hiking sock as a pop filter was a pretty great idea still lol
What is the shocker to combine with this blue yeti