Strange year, last french open and I think us open I think the French I can understand ,but the us open ,12 years without winning it if he had kept on winning there he would be close to 30 slams
Why do we, Federer fans, feel his triumphs as well as his pains and defeats profoundly? There's something about Roger that's just irresistible and addictive. Maybe because he's a humble, caring, talented, gorgeous and peRFect human being!
Why; All players like nadal have a bad day and they can lose even in their favorite tournament. I just don't understand why people try to justify the player who lose or take something from the player who won a slam. Nadal also won the australian open 2022 because djokovic couldn't participate. But nobody writes something about nadal. At least, federer won roland garros with nadal having participated.
Nadal fan here, and I think Roger deserves this title more than anyone that year. Look at the emotion he emanated as he kneeled down on the ground. I'm so glad that he won this to complete the career slam.
Definitely his most satisfying win at least as a fan to watch with how dominant Nadal was on clay I’m glad fed was able to get at least one major at Roland Garros before he retired
At 12:48 we know now from a 2019 interview with Tommy Haas that this was the point that turned everything around for Federer during the French open...down two sets and facing break point in the third set (fourth round I think), Fed went for a massive inside-out forehand and Tommy says in the interview that it shocked him. Tommy thought it would go out and was amazed by Fed's boldness during a huge moment. Tommy said if Fed missed that forehand, he thinks it was over and he would have won in straight sets.
It's truly incredible how one point - one shot, can drastically change a tournament let alone history. So many points and shots that totally changed everything, obviously we can name some famous ones but this one is up there. Really fascinating
I'm a big Rafa fan but I'm so happy Roger got this title. I feel with his all-surface awesomeness, Roger deserved at least 2 FOs; he was so good that he made 5 FO finals but he had the misfortune of continually running into a fellow all-time great and the greatest player on clay in history, Rafa. Until I saw this video I didn't know what a nail-biting path Roger had to his 2009 FO crown: dropping 6 sets before the final, coming through 2 very tight 5 setters, playing 6 tiebreakers and winning 5, being a point away (against Haas) from being served out of the tournament in straight sets ... Roger really showcased his phenomenal movement, defence and heart in this tournament.
In Agassi's defense it was his spine that ended his career, he was born with the issue he talks about it at length in his book. I think if not for his back he wouldn't have stopped(not saying he could have played anywhere near as long as Fed)
Most people act as if Roger didn't deserve enough credit for being such an outstanding all surface player. It's a remarkable thing for Roger to have won even if Rafael wasn't there.
I thought Roger took on an easy route to the finals. Each round gradually got tougher and gave him a challenge. Great respect for Roger. The greatest player in the history of tennis. He is the tennis.
Federer is not tennis on clay with only 1 Roland Garros title. Nadal is tennis on clay with 11 Roland Garros. It follows that Federer is not tennis overall. Plus, Federer is not better than Djokovic on hard courts, so he is far from being a synonym of tennis on hard courts.
@@srkucrickk Fed has 1 WTF title more and has 1 less AO and 5 US opens. How many does Djokovic have again? 3 So total HC GS for Djokovic is 10 Total HC GS for Federer is 11 so there you have it.
vivek s Djokovic is 6 years younger than federer and is only one hardcourt GS behind him. So its very likely that djokovic will overtake federer in terms of Hardcourt GS.
The greatest moment ever in Roland Garros...Forever wedged in my brain. I even remember where I was, who I was with, what I was drinking...This moment made me cry too😭💗. This added to his GOAT status and you can see how it really meant to him. One of his greatest battle to being the GOAT is winning one of Roland Garros championship🔥 That was really emotional &also my most glorious birthday celebration ever👀🎉
I perfectly remember where I was and the emotion which came up for this final whereas I did absolutely not give a shit about nadal’s 135 roland garros titles. I think it is exactly the same for all tennis fans
Djokovic fans have to be really glad Nadal was playing at a very insane level at a very young age (2005-2009), because without that happening while him being 17, 18, 19 years of age, Federer would have run away with literally every tournament and won like 5 or 6 more GS at the time. He was the second best clay courter of that time already anyway. He lost 1 semifinal and 3 finals at the french (2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 respectively), AO 2009 and Wimbledon 2008. By 2010 Nadal was consolidated, and much more mature and experienced so not really counting those years afterwards.
In Tennis, if your good, your good doesn't matter that much if your teenager or in your 20's. Although ofcourse your much better when your at 23-26. My point is, Nadal wasn't the first player to show elite level at those age. Mcenroe, Becker to name a few who had their best days at those age bracket (18-22). Being older is much harder though, so that credit goes to Federer in that case...
No, we are glad that Djokovic stopped Nadal from breaking all Federer's records so that Nole can be G.O.A.T He is only 1 year younger than Nadal. Since 2011 Novak has won 18 slams, 31 masters 1000, 4 ATP finals, and spend 325+ weeks at number 1. Nadal and Federer TOGETHER have won 15 slams, 28 masters 1000, 1 ATP finals, and 132 weeks at number 1.
@@Milanche87 Two things: 1- there is no definitive GOAT, because Djokovic didn't play in the 60s, 70s, 80s, etc.. Djokovic is the best of the last 10 years. That I am ok with. 2- The differences between Djokovic, Nadal and Federer are infimal. So no, this GOAT debate is just dumb. End of story.
@@samy29987 You are comparing level of tennis played in 60's, 70's and 80's with today!? LOL Those matches look like recreative game comparing with today, by every aspect. Federer put the bar very high but he won most of the titles and spend weeks at number 1 against Roddick, Safin, Hewit, Gonzales, Philippoussis, Gonzales, Baghdatis.. Average players if you compare them with Novak and Nadal at their highest peak. He only won Garros thanks to Soderling, his score against Nadal on clay is disaster. Djokovic had much stronger competition, although people from the west don't like him there is no denying against numbers. We will see what future brings but no doubt Novak is the best so far.
@@Milanche87 Djokovic was usually winning 1 slam a year from 2008-2014 but in 2015 (when Nadal had his disaster year) he started winning everything. I don’t want to disrespect Novak but more say that the comp argument is stupid.
Compare this to any of Nadal's French Open titles and it's like night and day - as great as Federer is on clay, Nadal makes it look absurdly easy to win a French Open.
@@sakthiashwin I'm a Murray fan, but Federer and Nadal are the two greatest players ever. Their legacies will forever be intertwined, and they make each others' achievements greater by having played together. There's no need to be upset :)
Look at this man standing ON the base line even on clay ... its really what sets him apart from the other two ... I mean its a sight for sore eyes when tennis is played from 5 m behind the baseline ... look at how Roger dances on it ... it is really and truly a thing of immaculate Beauty
Federer was down Big in Multiple Matches during this Tournament...Played his BEST when against the Ropes...Not sure how many Drop shots he hits during this Tournament but they were so Beautiful...
@Shinobu Tsurubushi Like Djokovic's RG worths something... Nadal would have been beated even by Nishikori that year. Nobody defeated a great Nadal fair and square.
@Shinobu Tsurubushi the same thing about Rafa beating Roger in Wimbledon, you Rafa´s fan always forget what´s convenient for you, Roger was with the mononucleosis but he never complain about it like Rafa does EVERYTIME that he loses
Fro some Reasons, i would Rate his French Open 2009 as slightly Higher and MORE memorable because he showed his true fighting spirit. let's admit he is a born genius but what he had to do to complete the Career Slam and how he came about it. Clutch forehand against Hass. not to forget his grueling 5 Set against Del Potro - and when he wins against Soderling - when he falls - tears streaming down his check. Damn, that was emotional
The Most emotional Grand slam Win for Great Roger ? may be ... But as his ardent fan it was super emotional, satisfying for me, to say the least ! even looking back 10 yrs it clearly stands out.. #Respect #RF !
Let's win the 2nd French Open ! ! ! 9:13 WHAT A POINT, Federer's running speed. . the drop shot impossible to reach for other players. His face after winning reminds me of Sampras . .
@@teatla4801 You mean Del Potro..... ON CLAY? 😂😂😂 Then Del Potro is totally irrelevant when Rafa beats him in USO17 (who had beaten Federer in the previous round lol) just because his rank was lower coming back from injury. The hypocrissy.
@@rafagoat575 hypocrisy it seems. Anyone who follows tennis would know how good delpo was in 09, and his struggles after that due to 3 wrist surgeries and another knee surgery. Due to his wrist surgeries, he was never the same player, unable to use his backhand as a weapon like in USO 09, resorting to slices.
Rafa GOAT mate that’s not his point No matter how good Nadal or anyone else is Chris is simply marvelling at the fact that Federer was called ‘old’ 10 years ago and today he’s still winning titles
God damn I can’t remember this Acususo match but I remember I was in school when Federer was facing Del Potro and I couldn’t even concentrate in my class for the whole day
Great video man! Thank you! I never realized Federer was down two sets to love to Haas. Then beating Del Potro is always tricky for Federer. Great tournament for Federer despite Nadal not being able to beat Nadal in the final.
I love Novak, and I love Johnny Mac, and I love Boris, and I actually kind of love Lendl (Connors, Sampras, Agassi, Murray and the highly overrated, one-surface clay king Nadal are all sourpuss lame cry-baby putzes) but Roger, for all he has done and meant and all his firsts and lasting records, simply is the GREATEST OF ALL TIME, EVER and EVER and EVER.
@MqchaXD at this point u r sounding like u r just making excuses seriously like imagine the amount of mental break down when u r so injury prone like Nadal is n that too in ur prime . Imagine facing so much hatred that Djokovic faced just for standing in Federers way and defeating him fare and square and still not getting the respect he deserves . Like u federer fans will always come up with excuses to make ur GOAT claim which at this point is very much in favour of Djokovic .
The time Nadal got knock-out, all the pressure was multiplied by like a 100 fold for Federer to win the FO lmao, as a fan I was so nervous he will fvck up the chance, this was the only chance.Because He's getting older, Nadal reaching his absolute peak, etc. etc. Not so surprise he had this struggle of a run against lesser opponents (asides Del Potro and Soderling ). He played nervously through out the tournament after that 4th round lol.
Federer was knocked out of 21 Slams by Nadal and Djokovic, including 10 Finals. Hard to imagine how many more trophies he would have held if those two didn't exist.
The point is that Federer established such a record-breaking number of slam titles and the others spen years chasing after him and on improving their games to try toobtain his skills.
Kinda funny to think that out of all the matches, the final was virtually the most one sided. Every other match Fed had to dig deep and get out of trouble. Honestly believe that even tho Nadal was out, it was one of the hardest tournaments he ever had to win.
If anyone is debating who the real goat is ,watch the semi final of the us open 2009, it’s probably the best and most perfect game I’ve ever witnessed... 10000000% roger is defo the greatest of all time,not because he’s won grand slams but because when he’s on there’s no player ever that can compete . People’s champion
As great as he is, he will never beat Nadal at RG, he needed to avoid Nadal to win here, but then again sometimes it works like that and you can only beat who is in front of you!! Sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good
No luck in that, Nadal lost fair and square to the very man Federer had to beat so...Can't win every single fucking time, even the king of clay with his 12 RG titles
Lucas Lopes how can you say it wasn’t lucky he avoided Rafa that year? As great a player RF is, his game does not match up well against Rafa on clay. To beat Rafa on clay you have to hit him off the court which very few people can obviously, but that is how Robin Soderling beat Nadal, he had the game that day to do it, cuz he hits BIG all the time, RF does not hit big on clay, and I say this being a huge RF fan!! It’s just in Clay Rogers game does not match up to Rafa game. It’s all about matchups on the ATP tour, every tour player will tell you that. Just because A beat B and B beat C, doesn’t mean that A will beat C....it doesn’t work that way
It is very hard to say luck, its his persistence and and consistency of 5 years. Federer had to be there in the finals to create the chance and he was there in the finals/semifinals last 3/4 years consecutively.
Of Course, He Benefited In 2009 From Nadal Losing There Early. Federer Probably Would Not Have Won The "French Open" Until Today, But He Took His Chance. You Have To Respect That.
this completed the career grand slam for Federer; the same is true for Djokovic. it is startling to note though that both have won the French Open only ONCE in their career, at least so far. to balance the equation though: Nadal has won the Australian Open only ONCE as well...
Both of them NEEDED the Bull to be out of the equation to win RG. However, Nadal beat them both to win his first 2 hard court slams(AO-09, USO-10) and complete his career slam.
Struggled? He reached all 4 GS finals that year, won 2 and lost 2. From that alone he had a very good year. Don't remember the rest of that season though.
@@erikelrojo99 Oh ok, my bad. Misunderstood your comment. For sure he struggled to win the french that year. After Nadal lost, he must have felt a lot of pressure within himself thinking it was a massive opportunity to win which is probably why he struggled so much against Haas and Delpo. He definitely earned it for sure.
Половина сетки у Роджера имели шанс победить его. Содерлинг не единого шанса не имел, и иметь не мог. Он прекрасно это понимал, обреченность была на его лице ещё до матча. Неудобный соперник, практически клиент Федерера, принёсший ему самый ценный трофей карьеры!
Soderling must be Roger's favorite tennis player of all time
Roger also dislikes him for ending his slam semi final streak
😀😀👍👍
Strange year, last french open and I think us open I think the French I can understand ,but the us open ,12 years without winning it if he had kept on winning there he would be close to 30 slams
Why do we, Federer fans, feel his triumphs as well as his pains and defeats profoundly? There's something about Roger that's just irresistible and addictive. Maybe because he's a humble, caring, talented, gorgeous and peRFect human being!
Why; All players like nadal have a bad day and they can lose even in their favorite tournament. I just don't understand why people try to justify the player who lose or take something from the player who won a slam. Nadal also won the australian open 2022 because djokovic couldn't participate. But nobody writes something about nadal. At least, federer won roland garros with nadal having participated.
Always difficult for others to win the Nadal Open
Nadal Open *LMAOF*
RG: Rafa’s Grounds
Open is how Nadull's butt got by Soderling that year
lmao djokovic did the impossible today then, by winning it
@@chrisnam5490 He took advantage of Rafa's foot injury
Nadal fan here, and I think Roger deserves this title more than anyone that year. Look at the emotion he emanated as he kneeled down on the ground. I'm so glad that he won this to complete the career slam.
Definitely his most satisfying win at least as a fan to watch with how dominant Nadal was on clay I’m glad fed was able to get at least one major at Roland Garros before he retired
One of the greatest athletes of all time! Good luck for Roland-Garros 2019 Roger!
Roger's last great year- 2019.
At 12:48 we know now from a 2019 interview with Tommy Haas that this was the point that turned everything around for Federer during the French open...down two sets and facing break point in the third set (fourth round I think), Fed went for a massive inside-out forehand and Tommy says in the interview that it shocked him. Tommy thought it would go out and was amazed by Fed's boldness during a huge moment. Tommy said if Fed missed that forehand, he thinks it was over and he would have won in straight sets.
Yea well he would be serving up 5-3
It's truly incredible how one point - one shot, can drastically change a tournament let alone history. So many points and shots that totally changed everything, obviously we can name some famous ones but this one is up there. Really fascinating
11:22 timestamp I think you mean.
Federer earned this French Open title, whether Nadal was there or not. It's not as if the other guys gave it to him on silver platter. A win is a win!
You are so right ✅
That is not true. Tennis fans called Federer the undisputed best after FO 2009, even though he did not defeat Nadal there. Please do not be delusional
what do you mean ? soderling beat nadal in semi-final, and federer beat him in final. Nadal WAS there.
@@SatishSingh-mk7jq Soderling beat Nadal in the 4th round.
That semi v Del Po - an all time classic. And that forehand v Haas - the most important of his career.
The day Roger saved his legacy 😊
I'm a big Rafa fan but I'm so happy Roger got this title. I feel with his all-surface awesomeness, Roger deserved at least 2 FOs; he was so good that he made 5 FO finals but he had the misfortune of continually running into a fellow all-time great and the greatest player on clay in history, Rafa. Until I saw this video I didn't know what a nail-biting path Roger had to his 2009 FO crown: dropping 6 sets before the final, coming through 2 very tight 5 setters, playing 6 tiebreakers and winning 5, being a point away (against Haas) from being served out of the tournament in straight sets ... Roger really showcased his phenomenal movement, defence and heart in this tournament.
"to me you are the greatest player in history"! Thank you Robin ... (for everything)
Agassi at the age of 39 is a host while Roger Federer is still playing at the age of 39 👍
In Agassi's defense it was his spine that ended his career, he was born with the issue he talks about it at length in his book. I think if not for his back he wouldn't have stopped(not saying he could have played anywhere near as long as Fed)
@@Blinkncali21 true, and players typically retired earlier back then, agassi playing until 34/35 was a remarkable feat in itself
Most people act as if Roger didn't deserve enough credit for being such an outstanding all surface player. It's a remarkable thing for Roger to have won even if Rafael wasn't there.
I thought Roger took on an easy route to the finals. Each round gradually got tougher and gave him a challenge. Great respect for Roger. The greatest player in the history of tennis. He is the tennis.
Federer is not tennis on clay with only 1 Roland Garros title. Nadal is tennis on clay with 11 Roland Garros. It follows that Federer is not tennis overall. Plus, Federer is not better than Djokovic on hard courts, so he is far from being a synonym of tennis on hard courts.
@@srkucrickk Got it. I have one question, though. Who won the most grand slam so far?
Marcos Villavicencio A
@@srkucrickk Fed has 1 WTF title more and has 1 less AO and 5 US opens. How many does Djokovic have again? 3
So total HC GS for Djokovic is 10
Total HC GS for Federer is 11 so there you have it.
vivek s Djokovic is 6 years younger than federer and is only one hardcourt GS behind him. So its very likely that djokovic will overtake federer in terms of Hardcourt GS.
The greatest moment ever in Roland Garros...Forever wedged in my brain. I even remember where I was, who I was with, what I was drinking...This moment made me cry too😭💗. This added to his GOAT status and you can see how it really meant to him. One of his greatest battle to being the GOAT is winning one of Roland Garros championship🔥
That was really emotional &also my most glorious birthday celebration ever👀🎉
One of the most deserved titles for Federer. So interesting this hard way was to his 1st French Open, really special victory. Great video ;)
This title and Australian open 2017 for sure
Federer really won the title defeating Tommy Haas. What a comeback made Roger! Come on Roger, to the 21th Grand Slam!
@@josemariacasadoberbel4214 th-cam.com/video/lSTK7EhJGuI/w-d-xo.html
Flynn never beat Rafa at RG and Roger’s sponsors paid off Soderling to throw the final. Hardly deserved.
@Hersh Shorsh Federer had two five setter and two four setters. Maybe his toughest won Slam
I perfectly remember where I was and the emotion which came up for this final whereas I did absolutely not give a shit about nadal’s 135 roland garros titles. I think it is exactly the same for all tennis fans
Djokovic fans have to be really glad Nadal was playing at a very insane level at a very young age (2005-2009), because without that happening while him being 17, 18, 19 years of age, Federer would have run away with literally every tournament and won like 5 or 6 more GS at the time. He was the second best clay courter of that time already anyway. He lost 1 semifinal and 3 finals at the french (2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 respectively), AO 2009 and Wimbledon 2008. By 2010 Nadal was consolidated, and much more mature and experienced so not really counting those years afterwards.
In Tennis, if your good, your good doesn't matter that much if your teenager or in your 20's. Although ofcourse your much better when your at 23-26. My point is, Nadal wasn't the first player to show elite level at those age. Mcenroe, Becker to name a few who had their best days at those age bracket (18-22). Being older is much harder though, so that credit goes to Federer in that case...
No, we are glad that Djokovic stopped Nadal from breaking all Federer's records so that Nole can be G.O.A.T He is only 1 year younger than Nadal. Since 2011 Novak has won 18 slams, 31 masters 1000, 4 ATP finals, and spend 325+ weeks at number 1. Nadal and Federer TOGETHER have won 15 slams, 28 masters 1000, 1 ATP finals, and 132 weeks at number 1.
@@Milanche87 Two things: 1- there is no definitive GOAT, because Djokovic didn't play in the 60s, 70s, 80s, etc.. Djokovic is the best of the last 10 years. That I am ok with. 2- The differences between Djokovic, Nadal and Federer are infimal. So no, this GOAT debate is just dumb. End of story.
@@samy29987 You are comparing level of tennis played in 60's, 70's and 80's with today!? LOL Those matches look like recreative game comparing with today, by every aspect. Federer put the bar very high but he won most of the titles and spend weeks at number 1 against Roddick, Safin, Hewit, Gonzales, Philippoussis, Gonzales, Baghdatis.. Average players if you compare them with Novak and Nadal at their highest peak. He only won Garros thanks to Soderling, his score against Nadal on clay is disaster. Djokovic had much stronger competition, although people from the west don't like him there is no denying against numbers. We will see what future brings but no doubt Novak is the best so far.
@@Milanche87 Djokovic was usually winning 1 slam a year from 2008-2014 but in 2015 (when Nadal had his disaster year) he started winning everything. I don’t want to disrespect Novak but more say that the comp argument is stupid.
Federer's is great, the part where he gets excited when he listens to his country's anthem, that part shows how big he is.
Compare this to any of Nadal's French Open titles and it's like night and day - as great as Federer is on clay, Nadal makes it look absurdly easy to win a French Open.
That's why nadal is king of clay
There's another Nadal fan commenting things totally unrelated to the video
@@sakthiashwin I'm a Murray fan, but Federer and Nadal are the two greatest players ever. Their legacies will forever be intertwined, and they make each others' achievements greater by having played together. There's no need to be upset :)
As federer made look easy win on grass at wimbledon
@@mz2250 Yes, Roger is at home whenever he wields his magic wand in Centre Court. In there he plays unmatched tennis.
Thank you for including the ceremony with the beautiful Swiss national anthem and the emotions. Roger is one of our national treasures.
Look at this man standing ON the base line even on clay ... its really what sets him apart from the other two ... I mean its a sight for sore eyes when tennis is played from 5 m behind the baseline ... look at how Roger dances on it ... it is really and truly a thing of immaculate Beauty
The most emotional championship! Unexpected gift for Roger and fans!
Commentators said: "Nadal the best clay court player of this generation" Now.... Best Clay Court Tennis player EVER
The most doped player of all time
@@MattyOyola217 cry
Federer was down Big in Multiple Matches during this Tournament...Played his BEST when against the Ropes...Not sure how many Drop shots he hits during this Tournament but they were so Beautiful...
He had to fight in almost every match, like in Australia 2017.
@Shinobu Tsurubushi Like Djokovic's RG worths something... Nadal would have been beated even by Nishikori that year. Nobody defeated a great Nadal fair and square.
@Shinobu Tsurubushi the year Novak won wasn't the year he defeated Nadal.
@Shinobu Tsurubushi the same thing about Rafa beating Roger in Wimbledon, you Rafa´s fan always forget what´s convenient for you, Roger was with the mononucleosis but he never complain about it like Rafa does EVERYTIME that he loses
@@alfrednite6398 Federer reached semifinal in AO, final in RG, final in Wimbledon and won USO with mononucleosis?
@@radilev1996 yes, he wasn't at his best and yet was competitive
Love the emotion federer showed here. The title thats eluded him throughout his illustrious career. He finally won the elusive roland garros trophy
Fro some Reasons, i would Rate his French Open 2009 as slightly Higher and MORE memorable because he showed his true fighting spirit. let's admit he is a born genius but what he had to do to complete the Career Slam and how he came about it. Clutch forehand against Hass. not to forget his grueling 5 Set against Del Potro - and when he wins against Soderling - when he falls - tears streaming down his check. Damn, that was emotional
The most welcomed champion of the French Open...win another FO....RF
Lol no. He's gonna get steamrolled tomorrow
Greatest champion but cries after every win shows his passion that is unmatched
He gonna get the second Rolang Garros Title this year!👍
I'm hoping for it
Lol
🤣🤣🤣😂
Rather his withdrawal from tennis
Nice prediction
That IO Forehand at 11:25 has to be the most important shot for Fed ever.
The Most emotional Grand slam Win for Great Roger ? may be ... But as his ardent fan it was super emotional, satisfying for me, to say the least ! even looking back 10 yrs it clearly stands out.. #Respect #RF !
What a great video thank you i remember this french open 2009 like it's yesterday
Let's win the 2nd French Open ! ! ! 9:13 WHAT A POINT, Federer's running speed. . the drop shot impossible to reach for other players.
His face after winning reminds me of Sampras . .
Probably the most awaited win of his career...
Nothing about this win was easy, what an absolute beauty this man is!
Not even avoiding Nadal? lol
Rafa GOAT he still had to face tough opponents like del potro sure it wasn’t the hardest but it sure has heck wasn’t the easiest
@@teatla4801 You mean Del Potro..... ON CLAY? 😂😂😂
Then Del Potro is totally irrelevant when Rafa beats him in USO17 (who had beaten Federer in the previous round lol) just because his rank was lower coming back from injury.
The hypocrissy.
What a joke! Nothing... Really!?🤣🤣🤣 He avoided the greatest ever on this surface. Nothing else!
@@rafagoat575 hypocrisy it seems. Anyone who follows tennis would know how good delpo was in 09, and his struggles after that due to 3 wrist surgeries and another knee surgery. Due to his wrist surgeries, he was never the same player, unable to use his backhand as a weapon like in USO 09, resorting to slices.
Outstanding video! I have seen it 10 years later, I have a feeling he can do it again!
Thank you for this video.
His face during the Swiss national anthem always gets to my tear ducts. A landmark moment in tennis.
15:44 Hahahaha, they were already calling him "old" 10 years ago.
Jesus Christ this man is Superman.
Nadal has won more slams than him after turning 30. Just saying lol
Rafa GOAT mate that’s not his point
No matter how good Nadal or anyone else is Chris is simply marvelling at the fact that Federer was called ‘old’ 10 years ago and today he’s still winning titles
@@rafagoat575 Who's talking about Rafa?
@@chrism3790 I am
@@rafagoat575 Yeah we got that. Anything else completely unrelated to my comment you want to talk about?
i also shed a tear when Mighty Fed Won the Title
God damn I can’t remember this Acususo match but I remember I was in school when Federer was facing Del Potro and I couldn’t even concentrate in my class for the whole day
Nice video! let's do it again after 10 years roger :D
I do not think so
No 3-0 vs nadal always same
Wow didn't realize how close he was to losing the R2 match against Acasuso
Nice video! GOAT
Great video man! Thank you! I never realized Federer was down two sets to love to Haas. Then beating Del Potro is always tricky for Federer. Great tournament for Federer despite Nadal not being able to beat Nadal in the final.
Wonderful video! Congratulations and thank you! :)
He definitely completed his 10 year challenge 😊
But not against Nadal
Dany Rubio not his fault that his opponent defeated Nadal earlier.
Great video! Pity about the sound during the Haas and la Monf matches, but thanks for this. And lol at 26:51
I love Novak, and I love Johnny Mac, and I love Boris, and I actually kind of love Lendl (Connors, Sampras, Agassi, Murray and the highly overrated, one-surface clay king Nadal are all sourpuss lame cry-baby putzes) but Roger, for all he has done and meant and all his firsts and lasting records, simply is the GREATEST OF ALL TIME, EVER and EVER and EVER.
Yeah, Nadal overrated. Keep crying.
Nadal overrated 😂😂😂😂 nice joke bro 20 slams btw
@MqchaXD at this point u r sounding like u r just making excuses seriously like imagine the amount of mental break down when u r so injury prone like Nadal is n that too in ur prime . Imagine facing so much hatred that Djokovic faced just for standing in Federers way and defeating him fare and square and still not getting the respect he deserves . Like u federer fans will always come up with excuses to make ur GOAT claim which at this point is very much in favour of Djokovic .
Which title means more to Roger?
2009 14th Grand Slam(French Open) or
2017 18th Grand Slam(Australian Open)
I think every GrandSlam is imp for Roger
Those 2 & Wimbledon 2009 are probably his top 3
He always says Wimbledon 2003 because it was the one that made him believe he was truly good enough.
2009 made him the goat,2017 confirmed he was the goat
2009 French Open. He would never be considered the goat if he didn’t win it
Roger Federer - G.O.A.T.!!!
Best moment
Excellent
Thanks for this great video 👍
His screams were ear piercing during this one.
Merciiii Rodger 🎾😍👏👏👏
Thank you soderling
The time Nadal got knock-out, all the pressure was multiplied by like a 100 fold for Federer to win the FO lmao, as a fan I was so nervous he will fvck up the chance, this was the only chance.Because He's getting older, Nadal reaching his absolute peak, etc. etc. Not so surprise he had this struggle of a run against lesser opponents (asides Del Potro and Soderling ). He played nervously through out the tournament after that 4th round lol.
fedrer deserve this trophy after missing so many opportunities
Good job with the video!
Federer was knocked out of 21 Slams by Nadal and Djokovic, including 10 Finals. Hard to imagine how many more trophies he would have held if those two didn't exist.
The point is that Federer established such a record-breaking number of slam titles and the others spen years chasing after him and on improving their games to try toobtain his skills.
Fantastic film
RForever thank you Roger
Hey! Nice video buddy!
Roger please make it another RG this year.
The film should be called "Thank you Robin Soderling!"
Kinda funny to think that out of all the matches, the final was virtually the most one sided.
Every other match Fed had to dig deep and get out of trouble. Honestly believe that even tho Nadal was out, it was one of the hardest tournaments he ever had to win.
The GOAT...
Great video
Roger has framed Robin's photo in his bedroom out of respect. 🙏
If anyone is debating who the real goat is ,watch the semi final of the us open 2009, it’s probably the best and most perfect game I’ve ever witnessed... 10000000% roger is defo the greatest of all time,not because he’s won grand slams but because when he’s on there’s no player ever that can compete . People’s champion
Roger Federer at his clutchiest
As great as he is, he will never beat Nadal at RG, he needed to avoid Nadal to win here, but then again sometimes it works like that and you can only beat who is in front of you!! Sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good
No luck in that, Nadal lost fair and square to the very man Federer had to beat so...Can't win every single fucking time, even the king of clay with his 12 RG titles
Lucas Lopes how can you say it wasn’t lucky he avoided Rafa that year? As great a player RF is, his game does not match up well against Rafa on clay. To beat Rafa on clay you have to hit him off the court which very few people can obviously, but that is how Robin Soderling beat Nadal, he had the game that day to do it, cuz he hits BIG all the time, RF does not hit big on clay, and I say this being a huge RF fan!! It’s just in Clay Rogers game does not match up to Rafa game. It’s all about matchups on the ATP tour, every tour player will tell you that. Just because A beat B and B beat C, doesn’t mean that A will beat C....it doesn’t work that way
It is very hard to say luck, its his persistence and and consistency of 5 years. Federer had to be there in the finals to create the chance and he was there in the finals/semifinals last 3/4 years consecutively.
6:00 its not chumjetze not camon inot vamos...... its TRUE and WILD emotion for Federer
why the FFFF wouldnt this "movie" show the championship point!?!? incomprehensible
21:29 "that was the noise made by Roger Federer"
23 seed vs number 2 seed on the 7th june 2+3=5, 5+2=7, 7+7=14
Fed’s 14th slam
IT WAS DESTINY!
Still couldn't digest how he blew up the chance for Calender Grandslam😥
Of Course, He Benefited In 2009 From Nadal Losing There Early. Federer
Probably Would Not Have Won The "French Open" Until Today, But He Took His Chance. You Have To Respect That.
Same goes to Nadal, he took his change when Nole disallowed at AO this year.
It seemed the easiest matches in the final in straight sets than what he had in previous rounds, almost saved by te whisker in the match s Haas
Imagine if Robin hadn't defeated Nadal.
Roger would have never completed his career slam. And that would have been one of his biggest regrets in life
Thanks to soderling
the cut of the championship point is so anticlamactic lol still the video is great
Where did the sound go from the Haas match?
Soy argentino pero festejé este Grand Slam más que el de Gaudio en 2004 y el de Del Potro en 2009.
this completed the career grand slam for Federer; the same is true for Djokovic. it is startling to note though that both have won the French Open only ONCE in their career, at least so far. to balance the equation though: Nadal has won the Australian Open only ONCE as well...
Both of them NEEDED the Bull to be out of the equation to win RG. However, Nadal beat them both to win his first 2 hard court slams(AO-09, USO-10) and complete his career slam.
GOAT!!
Man he really struggled in 09, and to think he was way better in RG 2011 than here
Struggled? He reached all 4 GS finals that year, won 2 and lost 2. From that alone he had a very good year. Don't remember the rest of that season though.
@@samy29987 I meant he struggled in RG to win it, not the whole season.
@@erikelrojo99 Oh ok, my bad. Misunderstood your comment. For sure he struggled to win the french that year. After Nadal lost, he must have felt a lot of pressure within himself thinking it was a massive opportunity to win which is probably why he struggled so much against Haas and Delpo. He definitely earned it for sure.
If natal didn't exist how many French opens would roger have won?
C le meilleur sportif de tt les temps perfect Rf
Lucky
Thank you Robin Soderling!
Surely Roger has Robin face frame at his house.
YEEESSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A one sided final, Federer V Del Potro would have been a great final to watch.
30:00 Here he shows all the frustration accumulated for years by losing against Nadal.
Половина сетки у Роджера имели шанс победить его. Содерлинг не единого шанса не имел, и иметь не мог. Он прекрасно это понимал, обреченность была на его лице ещё до матча. Неудобный соперник, практически клиент Федерера, принёсший ему самый ценный трофей карьеры!
Why didn't they show Roger winning on match point? They skipped right to the trophy presentation.