The Vijayanagara Empire rose to prominence as a culmination of attempts by the Southern powers to ward off Muslim invasions by the end of the 13th century. At its peak, it subjugated almost all of Southern India's ruling dynasties and pushed the sultans of the Deccan beyond the Tungabhadra-Krishna River doab region, in addition to annexing Gajapati Empire (Odisha) up to the Krishna River, thus becoming a notable power. The Empire lasted for 300 years.
@@aamer236 he only did that to his enemies to set an example. It was a strategy to prevent them from revolting due to Mongols themselves were almost all the time outnumbered by their enemies.
Ghenghis Khan was a Emperor who had Great Mongol Empire, his childhood name was Temujin and was called Universal Ruler because he was Khan Of Khans. He is not just an Warrior, his a conqueror of the world known as war lord. Many history consider him as Brutal Emperor. “I am the flail of God. If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.” - Conqueror Ghenghis Khan
@souvikdraws1753 The empire was one of the biggest one. It conquered 1 by 3rd part of the world. The first post office system was developed by Mongols, the first administration was developed by Mongols and many others inventions. They were war Lords of the world.
"great"? what's with that metaphor. Use "cruel" and "ruthless". You call him 'great' despite his cruelty and the immense suffering he inflicted? Sure, running a kingdom might require tough decisions, but there's a difference between necessary firmness and outright brutality. Glorifying a tyrant who crossed that line is a disgrace to humanity!
@riteshsenpai6572 looks at the bright side too not only the dark side. Because he used to give punishment your saying like that. Cruel and ruthless that un necessary. Brutal is necessary. "There is no good in anything until it is finished." - Ghenghis Khan "A leader can never be happy until his people are happy." -Ghenghis Khan “He who can oppose the sovereign’s wrath and endure his anger shall be invincible.” - Ghenghis Khan That's why Ghenghis Khan is nor ruthless or cruel , he is invincible.
Ghenghiz Khan couldn't conquer Japan, Europe, etc. The so called "Mughal Empire" which showed up after Ghenghiz Khan was defeated by the Maratha Empire. Ahom a small Kingdom in Northeast India also defeated the Mughals.
@@babupasha3491 Those are facts which are written in Multiple History books. The Maratha Empire defeated Aurangzeb and expanded towards the North and the Northwest. It reached all the way towards Afghanistan. Ahoms under Lachit Borphukan defeated the Mughals and chased them away from Assam.
Pure blood Mongolian still reside in North east of India in huge numbers comprising of many states and that's the reason why they are hard to rule and suppress.
False! You are Arunachali, Arunachalis are not mongols they are mongoloid(Asians). Even though Arunachalis lived in inner Mongolia before coming to Tibet and then to Arunachal, but they were still just hill tribes genetically without horses or milk products unlike mongolians.
@@Bujbjjhfhhyfyvhvv I am Zo (Chin-Kuki-Mizo) and took my DNA Ancestry test. I had 12.6% ancestry from Mongolia like most people in North East. Though Arunachali or other Northeast ethnics are not Mongols but DNA research are scientific and people are classified Mongolids for a reason
@@AvsegnoGrisiewky I know Mizos show a bit of Mongolian ~15% in dna ancestry i.e highest in NE. But Arunachalis don't show Mongolian in genetics, Arunachalis show Siberian and east asian in genetics. Its quite surprising that Arunachalees even though geographically close to SEA show no percentage of SEA ancestry but rather show Genetic similarity with NEAsian like Japanese, Jurchens of North Korea, S koreans and Northern Chinese. Also their names are like Taki,Huto, Taro etc... very similar to Japanese(they too show NEAsian and Siberian) Most probably they are relatives of tangut people which long ago resided in Inner Mongolia and Hebei of china. They maybe most related to YI ethnic community of china.
@@t3ngristtt Temujin's father (in Kazakh pronunciation Temirshin) Yesyugei was the khan of Kiyatjv. Mother - Oyan from the Merkit family. Genghis Khan's wife, Borte, was from the Kazakh Konirat family. All the sons of the world conqueror bore Turkic names. The Mongols neither then nor still had such names. The word “khan” is also exclusively Turkic, and not Mongolian. The Mongols called their rulers by the title "kontaichi". Genghis Khan was elected at the usual Kazakh kurultai. The Mongols do not have such a word. Only Kazakhs who professed Tengrism buried their dead in secret places that few people knew about.
Alexandar is by far a better conquerer since he acomplished it 1300 years before genghis and had lesser technology. Genghis is more impress in the sense that he was destined to death after his father got assasinated yet he still were able to unit the mogol tribes. Alexandar on the other hand pretty much was planted to be a conqueror by his family
Alexander is no were near Genghis or even his general like subetai who alone conquered more territory then him. Alexander never invented phalings technique himself, his father invented it, he conquered entire greece made his army battle hardened and gifted this master piece army to Alexander like Nepo baby. There is never a Alexander without Phillips. Also the kingdom Alexander conquered were mostly tribal collusion ,had no were near fighting advance as Alexander. Even Persia was totely not uniform, there were different tribes had their own fighting techniques, stood no chance against phalings. Alaxander conquest are often equated with colonial empire conquering Africa or south America which never stood any chance to begin with due to technological gap.Forget about Genghis Khan, I don't even consider Alexander equal to his father who conquered strongest kingdom in the world that time, rubbing steel with steel.
*Alexander didn't even conquer 1/4 of what Gengis Khagan conquered.* Alexander is so overrated. Bcoz Alexander is related to Europeans, therefore they exagerrated too much about Alexander. Turk rulers and some Chinese dynasties like Qin dynasty were faar superior than clown Alexander.
Ah. Yes. Your forgetting Alexander was actually prince unlike Genghis khan who was just little tribe leaders son and that too doesn't matter cause when his dad died, he lost everything and started from the begining unlike Gemstone engraved Golden spooned Alexander the Privileged who started having a the greatest most well-trained army of its time, Alexander was also was taught by the greatest Philosophers, Generals, Tacticians of its time and actually know how to read and had access to World most best Libraries and scrolls of its time. Genghis khan was illiterate, He had to commition their people first ever Script himself. He built his armies Kingdom, had to to do the hard task of uniting all of their nomadic people unlike Alexanders who was so privileged that his Underrated Philip 2 who United the Macedonia for him. Sorry but Alexander the great would have always destined to be called "Great" wether he achieved anything or not. He was set up to be great from the beginning unlike Genghis khan who snatched that title on his own hands from other poeple who was set out to be Kings and Lords just like Alexander😅
Mongols (Duwa Khan of Chaghatai Khanate) attacked India 6 times during the reign of Sultan Alauddin Khalji. Alauudin Khalji defeated all these 6 Mongol invasions.These were large scale invasions between the year 1298 to 1306. In one of these invasions, Mongols employed 200,000 cavalry horsemen. It was more than that Halagu Khan used during his invasion of Baghdad (capital of Abbasid Caliphate) which emloyed 150,000 horsemen. You should have mentioned these details in your discussion. Sultan Alauddin Khalji successfully defended the Indian civilization from devastation by the Mongol hordes.
@@hippospoop1871 But these were continuation of the Mongol invasions and involved armies much bigger in size than those of Genghis Khan. Mongols suffered decisive defeats only at two places - in September 1260 CE in the battle of Ain Jalut (now part of Israel) and then in India. At both places they were defeated by the Memluk Generals. Mongol's power could never revive itself after suffering defeat in India.
@@Bujbjjhfhhyfyvhvv Alauddin Khalji was born in India and was also married to a Hindu lady. Even his son was also married to a Hindu lady. These people were though Muslims but their politics was not based on religion & they created a tolerant plural society in India. Your assumption that Memluk Turks & Mongols were same people is incorrect. These were two different races. Mongols however, later accepted Islam and became part of larger Muslim nation. Genghis Khan's grandson Berke was the first Mongol to accept Islsm.
This guy is a Ghengiz Khan apologist. Just because he didn’t conquer India and commit the atrocities that he did in the rest of the world, doesn’t absolve him of the crimes he committed.
1. He never said that Genghis khan didn't commit any atrocities. He only talked about his conquests. 2. People from the west assume Winston Churchill to be a hero. But, we experienced his demonic behaviour. It's global. Get over it.
@@vb98518 I am not supporting Ashoka either! 🙂My point with all these so called right wing historians is that they want to portray Islamic rulers as evil and Hindu rulers as good. I don’t think it is as simple as that. Every ruler did what he did in the interests of his own state. Chalukya killed the Pallava king and in retaliation the Pallavas went and burnt the Badami capital. Now should Kannadigas venerate Chalukya because they were Kannada Kings and hate Pallavas because they were Tamilians? Where does this lead us to nothing but hate for Tamilians? That is very crude terms what the right wing historians are doing.
Tell abt mighty Chalukya hoysalas rashtrakutas Ganga’s kadambas Vijayanagara empire our Karnataka was the best don’t know how it’s size was reduced after independence
Babur, the founder of the Mughal Empire in India, was from the Timurid dynasty. His lineage includes: 1. **Timurid Lineage**: Babur was a direct descendant of Timur (Tamerlane), the Turco-Mongol conqueror who established a large empire in Central Asia in the late 14th century. Babur's father, Umar Sheikh Mirza, was a descendant of Timur. 2. **Genghisid Lineage**: Through his mother, Qutlugh Nigar Khanum, Babur was also descended from the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan. Qutlugh Nigar Khanum was a princess of the Chagatai Khanate, one of the successor states of the Mongol Empire.
@dailyhacks4634 The concept of India existed in the form of Akhand Bharat aka Greater India during the Mauryan Era when the Mauryan Empire united the whole of the Subcontinent to defeat the Greek Invaders and covered half of Afghanistan. Akhand Bharat influenced the Tarim Basin and South East Asia in the form of Hinduism and Buddhism. At that time the Concept of your Islam didn’t exist. Islam was created around 600 A.D Also read this part and continue squirming: Bharat is another name of India, as set down in Article 1 of the Constitution, adopted in 1950, which states in English: "India, that is Bharat”
India was lucky that he did not invade India otherwise he would have destroyed the great Indian civilization into pieces. Also describe why his descendants converted to Islam?
We are talking abour Genghis Khan, Not his descendants. I think it would have been better if he conqeured India and crushed the Delhi Sultans. Even if he kiled everyone, India would have revived. Mongol Empire did not last long, China revived its Empire just 200 years after Mughal Rule. So if Genghis Khan had conquered India, Islamic Inaders would have been annilated and Hindus would have gained power sooner.
His accounting of incidences is accurate but his explanation of what happened and why it happened is 100 % incorrect. Please do not make up your mind about who Genghis khan was on the basis of this clip.
@@shivashankar-xy8zm I have read extensively about Alexander, Ceaser, Genghis, Cyrus, etc. And as I said he accounts the timeline and events correctly but he presents it in a way that entirely white-washes Khan. For example: He killed his brother not because the family was starving, he killed him because the brother took his fish once. another example - His son-in law was killed in the battle and in retaliation, he killed every man, his army brutally raped every woman in front of their family and then killed, he killed every animal, cattle, horses, dog. cat, etc. He then waited for weeks for the poor people who had somehow managed to fled the onslaught. Once they returned to mourn, he caught them and killed them too. all this for one fallen relative in a battle. Do you now think that Genghis was a man driven by Justice as Abhijit Chavda makes him out to be ??
@@saumitrad I'm just pointing out most of the rulers of history were like that. It is just always temujin they point out. Why not say the same about the likes Churchill or any other European kings. Although he is just a prime minister Churchill was considered the greatest countryman. Leave those in power they will backpedal.. ask common populace of britain about him.. they take pride in him. That is what irks me.. im not supporting chengiz just pointing out the flaw in accusations. Even alexander is considered as great but who knows whT his soldiers suffered through, he waged war on kingdom without any valid cause and killed millions but he is great. Romans utterly decimated anyone who doesn't bend their knee but they are considered great. Why not the mongol empire .. just view it like yet another ruler having his way with the world. Can you?
@@shivashankar-xy8zm no arguments there. Ceaser comitted a holocaust of all the Celtic / Germanic people. Millions, and for what - just to solidify his political standing in rome. Alexander, the so called "great", earned one more moniker. A moniker given to him by those who were on the recieving end of his glorious purpose. It was not "Great". It was the DEMON KING. Way more fitting then "Great". I totally agree with you. But then you should also be vexed by what this guy is saying. He is absolutely misrepresenting the history.
@@shivashankar-xy8zmThe topic is about Gengis Khana and he pointed out that he was a murderer, rapist and plunderer and not a person driven only by justice as presented in the video.
Wrong heading. India is very big. At that time Hoysala kings were very strong in south. So Changes Khan at most would have reached near Rajasthan. Rajputs were not an easy force to conquer.
No Empire completely conquered India. Even the Delhi Sultanate couldn't conquer Rajasthan. They were defeated by the Vijayanagara Empire in the South. The Delhi Sultanate couldn't conquer the Northeast either.
And Look at His hate for Muslim Rulers of India that he didn't even spoke the Khiljis and How the nephew of Jalal ud din Khilji , Ala Ud Din Khilji saved India From Mangols.....😂😂😂😂
The so called mughal founder babur was afraid to put his sights on south india at his time since this area was ruled by GOAT SHRIKRISHNA DEVARAYA who defeated 3 combined chuslim armies at once in a single battle.
_"The so called mughal founder babur was afraid to put his sights on south india at his time since this area was ruled by GOAT SHRIKRISHNA DEVARAYA who defeated 3 combined chuslim armies at once in a single battle."_ Goat? That's what the Mughals eat for lunch, hence it is called _gosht_ on today's Indian menu
He knew, it is the birthplace of Lord Buddha, that's the reason why he didn't invade India.. If you go through history, you will come to know it has been mentioned, this is a fact, which is true.
He wouldn't have been able to conquer the whole of India. He'd have conquered the region which never won any battles or wars throughout history. Lahore and Rawalpindi.
Iam a hindu but this man is a pseudo historian Genghis khan didn't conquered India because he had some sort of sympathy towards india is bullshit😂😂😂😂😂 If he had sympathy he would have freed india from turks rule😂
woh toh pahli bhi nahi tha....mongol nomadic log ha zydatar meat or dairy se khake survive karte hai. Ab modern age mein ake city me log vegetables or rice ye sab khate hai
Completely bias perspective. Always bashing Alexander and painting Genghis Khan as a saint. I like both but you can't study history and not wince when hearing what Genghis Khan would do in war. Alexander was a child compared to Genghis when it came to destruction.
@@thearch4162 psychology and biology are different subjects. Timur and babur can think anything what they want . This thread had a different beginning I guess. Plus timur never wrote a diary so it's very difficult to gauge what he thought of himself.
17 Mongol deployment head crushed by khilijii elephant . Mongol capture little part of Punjab and Kashmir vinod Khanna Rajesh Khanna why they look little Chinese . And mostly Hindu think the Mongols are loyal to Hindu no totally wrong
Hahahahahaha He is Praising Mongols out of His Hatred for the Chines and even Despairing Khurazm out of his hatred for Muslims and Aurangzeb Rulling India..... THANK You Soooooo much Jinnah.....❤
Aap ek baat batao ! Interviews Hindime kahe nehi lete ho ? Sabko samajme aajati ! English kitne percentage logo ki thikse samajme aati hai ? Log jada interested hote na, Samja koro
That's how less you know about history. Do you thing during an invasion people will be sitting in the side eating popcorns. Ofcourse if you have to dismantle a nation first dismantle it's populace. Our indian kings killed each others and your great ashoka killed.. every king only think about his nation nothing else. Justice only exist for your own people. And often chengiz khan retaliated not invaded. His entire conquest of China is retaliation.
Historians cast doubt whether Mugals are relate to Mongols. Babur claimed his Bloodline to Timur. This might be true but do you know that there is no Proof that Timur is direct Bloodline of Genghis Khan ? TImur simply claimed this without any Proof. Some say Timur was a Bastard child of an Illegitimate affair between Some Mongol Warlord and Turkic woman and was ashamed of his Ancestry and tried to cover this up by claimging to be a Descendant of Kublai Khan, Who was popular at that time.
There was no india there was no country before 1947 😂 ur country was boen in 47 and just adopted this name also "india" and all other names were given to us 🇵🇰 the lanf of Sindhu river ko😂
Looks like you learnt history in a madarsa. Real real history. Bharat is the oldest name of India. There was no such thing called "Islam" before 600 A.D.
This Indian “Historian” guy.. Muddling up all the historical facts about the Mongol Empire. He can't remember Genghis Khan’s actual name! Needs to do better mate 😅
According to thos bro . Mongolia was not a nation then. Why is he not saying the same about india at the time . The concept of india also did not exist then .
Jambu dweepa , Mehula , aryavart are some of the names foreign visitors of ancient India called it. Aryavart and Jambu dweep is also mentioned numerous times in our ancient scriptures. Megasthenes in ' Indica' clearly mentions the whole as India , not just one particular region . It was kind of present center ( chakravarti) and state system( rajya). Kindly get your facts right.
@@k.devika1595 by throwing in some fancy names you are trying to prove you are a knot it all. Bro the concept of ancient India is false . As a culture it extended to Afghanistan you may argue but each king held his territory it was not a country with same laws . Just a group and BORDERLESS .
@@dailyhacks4634 Gosh! You are one of those I see. It's all written my friend......the evidence exists whether you like it or not . And simply because you aren't well read, do not cast the same aspersions on me. I have read the Indica, Huang Tsang descriptions of india as well as various ' smritis' and ' intihasa'. Of course to the ignorant these all will sound like ' Fancy words '. And you say there were no laws. The whole of india followed specific rules during hostile events like wars too. It's clear you haven't a lick of what your talking. Do continue, it's futile arguing with the ignorants with arrogance...... who enjoy to be a rut of stupid assumptions, rather than doing the simple job of actually READING the said book.
According to your madarsa history, the concept of India didn't exist but the concept known as Bharat existed for thousands of years. Bharat is the oldest name of India.
@@k.devika1595 yes I am one of those mate . The issue with throwing names as you have is to prove your point you are sticking to one time zone . For instance huna empire went from parts of UP to Iran . So we cannot safely say this is one country . Mughals never truly made it to parts of tamilnad or srilanka so thier rules did not apply in these southern parts why? Because it wasn't one nation . To justify saying I ready hyung sang hence I know everything is a fools errand
Alauddin khilji is the only indian king who defeated Mongols and proetected india ...But not for once Alauddin kihlji literally defeated Mongols 9 times ...and his uncle Jalauddin kihjli also counter attacked Mongols at the Time the Genghiz khan were The empeoror of Mongol empire ... Literally this two super powers Preotected The India from Brutal Mongole ...So indian should thankfull to this two Sultans of India ❤
The Vijayanagara Empire rose to prominence as a culmination of attempts by the Southern powers to ward off Muslim invasions by the end of the 13th century. At its peak, it subjugated almost all of Southern India's ruling dynasties and pushed the sultans of the Deccan beyond the Tungabhadra-Krishna River doab region, in addition to annexing Gajapati Empire (Odisha) up to the Krishna River, thus becoming a notable power.
The Empire lasted for 300 years.
Genghis Khan should be called Great. Not Alexander who is only rated as he was European.
Europeans exagerrated that small king alexander the clown😂😂
setting apart the double standards, genghis went went and annihilated the cities he conquered, he made it unliveable, how can he called great then?
@aamer236 he only did that with enemies. He didn't just bully and conquer everyone. Mainly just the Muslims who were ruining silk road trade.
@@aamer236 he only did that to his enemies to set an example. It was a strategy to prevent them from revolting due to Mongols themselves were almost all the time outnumbered by their enemies.
10:49 Imagine Genghis Khan standing by the Indus banks & staring at India like a Chad
That’s cinematically great
Ghenghis Khan was a Emperor who had Great Mongol Empire, his childhood name was Temujin and was called Universal Ruler because he was Khan Of Khans. He is not just an Warrior, his a conqueror of the world known as war lord. Many history consider him as Brutal Emperor.
“I am the flail of God. If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.” - Conqueror Ghenghis Khan
Killer still... Nothing Great about him... apart from Changezi chicken...
What are 'great' and 'golden' doing in you sentence...
@souvikdraws1753 The empire was one of the biggest one. It conquered 1 by 3rd part of the world. The first post office system was developed by Mongols, the first administration was developed by Mongols and many others inventions. They were war Lords of the world.
"great"? what's with that metaphor. Use "cruel" and "ruthless".
You call him 'great' despite his cruelty and the immense suffering he inflicted? Sure, running a kingdom might require tough decisions, but there's a difference between necessary firmness and outright brutality. Glorifying a tyrant who crossed that line is a disgrace to humanity!
@riteshsenpai6572 looks at the bright side too not only the dark side. Because he used to give punishment your saying like that. Cruel and ruthless that un necessary. Brutal is necessary.
"There is no good in anything until it is finished." - Ghenghis Khan
"A leader can never be happy until his people are happy." -Ghenghis Khan
“He who can oppose the sovereign’s wrath and endure his anger shall be invincible.” - Ghenghis Khan
That's why Ghenghis Khan is nor ruthless or cruel , he is invincible.
Sorry! Abhijit Sir, but the contemporary of Genghis Khan in India was Iltutmish of slave dynasty, not Prithviraj Chauhan. 🙏🙏🙏
Pritviraj 1166-died 1192) , GENGHIS 1162-1227. They existed at same time
@@socraticlogicthere are written proofs for PRC birth year to be 1149 and 1166 also .. Nevertheless PRC and Genghis khan were contemporaries
Ganghis khan is THE most BADASS WARLORD of ALL time, my guy was thanos himself🔥
Anyone here already knowing this because of playing Age of Empires 2?
i use to play long back good times ! try Age of Empires 4 edition
@@temkaa4910 my pc too poor to handle aoe 4😢
Age of empires 2 was legendary game
I still prefer Age of Empires 1
yes
Genghis Khan was not muslim
Yeah but later mongol empire became muslim, and Mughal are descendants of mongol
@@mohamedsuhail5312 yet they are not the direct descendant of Genghis Khan and there is no evidence for the same
He was hindu like modi
@@vivekkrish2001 🤣🤣🤣
His grandson berke khan become muslim @@manudubey1993
Ghenghiz Khan couldn't conquer Japan, Europe, etc. The so called "Mughal Empire" which showed up after Ghenghiz Khan was defeated by the Maratha Empire. Ahom a small Kingdom in Northeast India also defeated the Mughals.
Jai BJP University
@@babupasha3491 Those are facts which are written in Multiple History books. The Maratha Empire defeated Aurangzeb and expanded towards the North and the Northwest. It reached all the way towards Afghanistan. Ahoms under Lachit Borphukan defeated the Mughals and chased them away from Assam.
@@_wokeweaklingscryoverwords_ Yogi baba gang's members. New hindutav university
@@babupasha3491 Good. Yogi Ji should become the future PM of Bharat.
Come to assam will show you the power of Ahom JAI AI AXOM 🙏@@babupasha3491
Damn. Hope you get your channel back as soon as possible bro.. 🙏
Pure blood Mongolian still reside in North east of India in huge numbers comprising of many states and that's the reason why they are hard to rule and suppress.
False! You are Arunachali, Arunachalis are not mongols they are mongoloid(Asians).
Even though Arunachalis lived in inner Mongolia before coming to Tibet and then to Arunachal, but they were still just hill tribes genetically without horses or milk products unlike mongolians.
@@Bujbjjhfhhyfyvhvv I am Zo (Chin-Kuki-Mizo) and took my DNA Ancestry test. I had 12.6% ancestry from Mongolia like most people in North East. Though Arunachali or other Northeast ethnics are not Mongols but DNA research are scientific and people are classified Mongolids for a reason
Basically you guys are momo sellers 😂😂😂
@@Manbeasstt
Momo was invented in Nepal near Bihar.
Momo is not a Chinese food for your info.
Momo is a South Asian dish not east asian
@@AvsegnoGrisiewky I know Mizos show a bit of Mongolian ~15% in dna ancestry i.e highest in NE.
But Arunachalis don't show Mongolian in genetics, Arunachalis show Siberian and east asian in genetics.
Its quite surprising that Arunachalees even though geographically close to SEA show no percentage of SEA ancestry but rather show Genetic similarity with NEAsian like Japanese, Jurchens of North Korea, S koreans and Northern Chinese. Also their names are like Taki,Huto, Taro etc... very similar to Japanese(they too show NEAsian and Siberian)
Most probably they are relatives of tangut people which long ago resided in Inner Mongolia and Hebei of china.
They maybe most related to YI ethnic community of china.
The chicken Manchurians are still a formidable force to this day
😂😂
Genghis Khan was a Kazakh, and his tribe was from Turkic-speaking tribes. their religion is Tengriism 👍
Wrong it's related with shamanism & Buddhism
Islam entered later even in turkey
@@AvaniMishra-q2d
he had a personal shaman whom he killed and his name was Teb-Tengri
For more info on GK there is a great YT series called Tatarian Christianity and the Revelation by Ryan Zehm.
Khan means chief not muslim khan
Many of our clans are descendeds are connected to To him
Khan or Khagan in Mongol means Leader. It has nothing to do with Islam.
Genghis Khan was a Kazakh, and his tribe was from Turkic-speaking tribes. their religion is Tengriism
😂😂😂 no way he was borat. Kazakh appeared in on map 20th century
@@t3ngristtt Temujin's father (in Kazakh pronunciation Temirshin) Yesyugei was the khan of Kiyatjv. Mother - Oyan from the Merkit family. Genghis Khan's wife, Borte, was from the Kazakh Konirat family. All the sons of the world conqueror bore Turkic names. The Mongols neither then nor still had such names. The word “khan” is also exclusively Turkic, and not Mongolian. The Mongols called their rulers by the title "kontaichi". Genghis Khan was elected at the usual Kazakh kurultai. The Mongols do not have such a word. Only Kazakhs who professed Tengrism buried their dead in secret places that few people knew about.
Wake up!. Your dreaming
Prithvirah Chauhan was king of delhi🤦🏻♂️ not just ajmer..
ajmer too
@@mamtasingh2703 that’s why i said not just Ajmer…it means Ajmer and delhi🤦🏻♂️
Alexandar is by far a better conquerer since he acomplished it 1300 years before genghis and had lesser technology. Genghis is more impress in the sense that he was destined to death after his father got assasinated yet he still were able to unit the mogol tribes. Alexandar on the other hand pretty much was planted to be a conqueror by his family
Alexander is no were near Genghis or even his general like subetai who alone conquered more territory then him. Alexander never invented phalings technique himself, his father invented it, he conquered entire greece made his army battle hardened and gifted this master piece army to Alexander like Nepo baby. There is never a Alexander without Phillips. Also the kingdom Alexander conquered were mostly tribal collusion ,had no were near fighting advance as Alexander. Even Persia was totely not uniform, there were different tribes had their own fighting techniques, stood no chance against phalings. Alaxander conquest are often equated with colonial empire conquering Africa or south America which never stood any chance to begin with due to technological gap.Forget about Genghis Khan, I don't even consider Alexander equal to his father who conquered strongest kingdom in the world that time, rubbing steel with steel.
Alexander teacher Aristotle
Gengis khan teacher Nature
Gengis khan Started from 0
*Alexander didn't even conquer 1/4 of what Gengis Khagan conquered.*
Alexander is so overrated.
Bcoz Alexander is related to Europeans, therefore they exagerrated too much about Alexander.
Turk rulers and some Chinese dynasties like Qin dynasty were faar superior than clown Alexander.
Alexander was clown .period ..only defeated garbage kings
Ah. Yes. Your forgetting Alexander was actually prince unlike Genghis khan who was just little tribe leaders son and that too doesn't matter cause when his dad died, he lost everything and started from the begining unlike Gemstone engraved Golden spooned Alexander the Privileged who started having a the greatest most well-trained army of its time, Alexander was also was taught by the greatest Philosophers, Generals, Tacticians of its time and actually know how to read and had access to World most best Libraries and scrolls of its time.
Genghis khan was illiterate, He had to commition their people first ever Script himself. He built his armies Kingdom, had to to do the hard task of uniting all of their nomadic people unlike Alexanders who was so privileged that his Underrated Philip 2 who United the Macedonia for him.
Sorry but Alexander the great would have always destined to be called "Great" wether he achieved anything or not. He was set up to be great from the beginning unlike Genghis khan who snatched that title on his own hands from other poeple who was set out to be Kings and Lords just like Alexander😅
Mongols (Duwa Khan of Chaghatai Khanate) attacked India 6 times during the reign of Sultan Alauddin Khalji. Alauudin Khalji defeated all these 6 Mongol invasions.These were large scale invasions between the year 1298 to 1306. In one of these invasions, Mongols employed 200,000 cavalry horsemen. It was more than that Halagu Khan used during his invasion of Baghdad (capital of Abbasid Caliphate) which emloyed 150,000 horsemen.
You should have mentioned these details in your discussion. Sultan Alauddin Khalji successfully defended the Indian civilization from devastation by the Mongol hordes.
These invasions happened after the death of genghis khan right?
@@hippospoop1871 But these were continuation of the Mongol invasions and involved armies much bigger in size than those of Genghis Khan. Mongols suffered decisive defeats only at two places - in September 1260 CE in the battle of Ain Jalut (now part of Israel) and then in India. At both places they were defeated by the Memluk Generals. Mongol's power could never revive itself after suffering defeat in India.
@@ghazanfardar1630 no genghis no win 🍇.
*Allaudin Khilji was a Mamluk Turk, relative of mongols😂😂*
Allaudin Khilji was not Indian brother, he was a Mamluk Turk who ruled India.
@@Bujbjjhfhhyfyvhvv Alauddin Khalji was born in India and was also married to a Hindu lady. Even his son was also married to a Hindu lady. These people were though Muslims but their politics was not based on religion & they created a tolerant plural society in India.
Your assumption that Memluk Turks & Mongols were same people is incorrect. These were two different races. Mongols however, later accepted Islam and became part of larger Muslim nation. Genghis Khan's grandson Berke was the first Mongol to accept Islsm.
I was so inspired by this video that , I went straight to play ghost of tsushima
Dasha dashaaa...!!!!!
This guy is a Ghengiz Khan apologist. Just because he didn’t conquer India and commit the atrocities that he did in the rest of the world, doesn’t absolve him of the crimes he committed.
1. He never said that Genghis khan didn't commit any atrocities. He only talked about his conquests.
2. People from the west assume Winston Churchill to be a hero. But, we experienced his demonic behaviour.
It's global. Get over it.
Ashoka committed brutalatrocities yet he is called great.
@@vb98518 I am not supporting Ashoka either! 🙂My point with all these so called right wing historians is that they want to portray Islamic rulers as evil and Hindu rulers as good. I don’t think it is as simple as that. Every ruler did what he did in the interests of his own state. Chalukya killed the Pallava king and in retaliation the Pallavas went and burnt the Badami capital. Now should Kannadigas venerate Chalukya because they were Kannada Kings and hate Pallavas because they were Tamilians? Where does this lead us to nothing but hate for Tamilians? That is very crude terms what the right wing historians are doing.
he did hisab chukta with idol breakers, based chingis khan
@@jeevan007037who tells you that Genghis kha was a muslim or mangol
The vastu of India with its tip that faces in the south direction makes it vulnerable for invasion
After being somewhat anti BJP, channel is back to apply balm to its old audience by bringing Nandi back and abhijit on show
Point?
Mongolia was a weak nation during WW1 and WW2. It could've been easily conquered by any of the Major Powers.
Mongols also destroyed the Order of Assassins in CE 1275 when they recaptured Alamut Castle.
Mother of Genghis Khan!
Tell abt mighty Chalukya hoysalas rashtrakutas Ganga’s kadambas Vijayanagara empire our Karnataka was the best don’t know how it’s size was reduced after independence
Babur, the founder of the Mughal Empire in India, was from the Timurid dynasty. His lineage includes:
1. **Timurid Lineage**: Babur was a direct descendant of Timur (Tamerlane), the Turco-Mongol conqueror who established a large empire in Central Asia in the late 14th century. Babur's father, Umar Sheikh Mirza, was a descendant of Timur.
2. **Genghisid Lineage**: Through his mother, Qutlugh Nigar Khanum, Babur was also descended from the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan. Qutlugh Nigar Khanum was a princess of the Chagatai Khanate, one of the successor states of the Mongol Empire.
Folks,dont confuse khan in genghis khan with khan of muslim,genghis wasnt muslim
I agree he was beliver of tengirsm which is combination of Buddhism & shamanism
@dailyhacks4634 The concept of India existed in the form of Akhand Bharat aka Greater India during the Mauryan Era when the Mauryan Empire united the whole of the Subcontinent to defeat the Greek Invaders and covered half of Afghanistan. Akhand Bharat influenced the Tarim Basin and South East Asia in the form of Hinduism and Buddhism.
At that time the Concept of your Islam didn’t exist. Islam was created around 600 A.D
Also read this part and continue squirming: Bharat is another name of India, as set down in Article 1 of the Constitution, adopted in 1950, which states in English: "India, that is Bharat”
India was lucky that he did not invade India otherwise he would have destroyed the great Indian civilization into pieces. Also describe why his descendants converted to Islam?
We are talking abour Genghis Khan, Not his descendants. I think it would have been better if he conqeured India and crushed the Delhi Sultans. Even if he kiled everyone, India would have revived. Mongol Empire did not last long, China revived its Empire just 200 years after Mughal Rule. So if Genghis Khan had conquered India, Islamic Inaders would have been annilated and Hindus would have gained power sooner.
@@hindurashtra63so if you don’t agree with someone’s ideology you just kill?? Does that make any sense?
His accounting of incidences is accurate but his explanation of what happened and why it happened is 100 % incorrect. Please do not make up your mind about who Genghis khan was on the basis of this clip.
You can always Google.
@@shivashankar-xy8zm I have read extensively about Alexander, Ceaser, Genghis, Cyrus, etc. And as I said he accounts the timeline and events correctly but he presents it in a way that entirely white-washes Khan. For example: He killed his brother not because the family was starving, he killed him because the brother took his fish once.
another example - His son-in law was killed in the battle and in retaliation, he killed every man, his army brutally raped every woman in front of their family and then killed, he killed every animal, cattle, horses, dog. cat, etc. He then waited for weeks for the poor people who had somehow managed to fled the onslaught. Once they returned to mourn, he caught them and killed them too.
all this for one fallen relative in a battle. Do you now think that Genghis was a man driven by Justice as Abhijit Chavda makes him out to be ??
@@saumitrad I'm just pointing out most of the rulers of history were like that. It is just always temujin they point out. Why not say the same about the likes Churchill or any other European kings. Although he is just a prime minister Churchill was considered the greatest countryman. Leave those in power they will backpedal.. ask common populace of britain about him.. they take pride in him. That is what irks me.. im not supporting chengiz just pointing out the flaw in accusations. Even alexander is considered as great but who knows whT his soldiers suffered through, he waged war on kingdom without any valid cause and killed millions but he is great. Romans utterly decimated anyone who doesn't bend their knee but they are considered great. Why not the mongol empire .. just view it like yet another ruler having his way with the world. Can you?
@@shivashankar-xy8zm no arguments there. Ceaser comitted a holocaust of all the Celtic / Germanic people. Millions, and for what - just to solidify his political standing in rome.
Alexander, the so called "great", earned one more moniker. A moniker given to him by those who were on the recieving end of his glorious purpose. It was not "Great". It was the DEMON KING. Way more fitting then "Great".
I totally agree with you. But then you should also be vexed by what this guy is saying. He is absolutely misrepresenting the history.
@@shivashankar-xy8zmThe topic is about Gengis Khana and he pointed out that he was a murderer, rapist and plunderer and not a person driven only by justice as presented in the video.
Our ancestors is Mongols from Northeast indian but we dnt about aryan race in our genes contain of mongolian blood
It's crazy to think that France and Vietnam had only one country between them at one point in history
May the Song dynasty last a 10000 years
Wrong heading. India is very big. At that time Hoysala kings were very strong in south. So Changes Khan at most would have reached near Rajasthan. Rajputs were not an easy force to conquer.
No Empire completely conquered India. Even the Delhi Sultanate couldn't conquer Rajasthan. They were defeated by the Vijayanagara Empire in the South. The Delhi Sultanate couldn't conquer the Northeast either.
@@_wokeweaklingscryoverwords_ no empire except the british I guess, I appreciate your comments by the way
Need more videos on world history and post independence
And Look at His hate for Muslim Rulers of India that he didn't even spoke the Khiljis and How the nephew of Jalal ud din Khilji , Ala Ud Din Khilji saved India From Mangols.....😂😂😂😂
When you say saved he also did the killing and conquering so it's not saved exactly
All the Khiljis & Mamluks were occupiers, they were not our own.
Chengiz Khan's rule would have been far better than these turks
Khiljis were Mamluk Turks not indian
Turks are relatives of mongols.😂
None of them faced ‘genghis’
The so called mughal founder babur was afraid to put his sights on south india at his time since this area was ruled by GOAT SHRIKRISHNA DEVARAYA who defeated 3 combined chuslim armies at once in a single battle.
_"The so called mughal founder babur was afraid to put his sights on south india at his time since this area was ruled by GOAT SHRIKRISHNA DEVARAYA who defeated 3 combined chuslim armies at once in a single battle."_
Goat? That's what the Mughals eat for lunch, hence it is called _gosht_ on today's Indian menu
@@YouCantHandleTheTruth. GOAT also abreviates Greatest of all Time. Not an animal.
@@srikarnv9834 _"GOAT also abreviates Greatest of all Time. Not an animal."_
No shyte Sherlock.
Buhara is derived from indian word vihara
He knew, it is the birthplace of Lord Buddha, that's the reason why he didn't invade India..
If you go through history, you will come to know it has been mentioned, this is a fact, which is true.
Where it is mentioned
@@kiyotakaayanokouji7339 he also believes in achhe din don't argue with them
@@dailyhacks4634 Achhe din is false, what I said is true..
He wouldn't have been able to conquer the whole of India. He'd have conquered the region which never won any battles or wars throughout history. Lahore and Rawalpindi.
Ghenghiz Khan is not a invader Mogul. In Mongolia Khan titile was given for the Leader and not Islamic Khan.
सिर्फ एक विनती है भाई हिंदी में करिए अपने शो को
According to these pseudo self claimed historians Genghis Khan and Alexander were great conquerors but Babur was an invader??😂😂
The only worrld conqueror i respect is lalitaditya
😂😂
At the time of prithviraj chauhan Alha udal were there in india whome no one can defeat.
All Demons arnt Evil. Some define "Power"
Just like taimur
Exactly like Ghenghis Khan (The Great)
Very good
If you want to learn more detaily bout khan then fetch a cbse book of class 11.
PANJAB NI JIT HOYAA💪
Ghenghis khan had fear of delhi muslim warriors
2mins silence to all bullas who say, allauddin khilji saved india from mongol invasion
Explain
brahmin media😢
Lack of common sense 😂
@@a_36_rajdeep_ray12 brahmins crying in the commment
Its Genghis kahn...And actual was Quann
When did Mongols become muslim from Buddhist ?
Chengis khan was not muslim. It’s just name
Mongols follow Buddhism and Shamanism. Just he is called Khan doesn't make him Muslim. 😂😂😂 hilarious
Mangol followed tengrism not Buddhism
@@sikasbkoju3715you failed your history class or what?
Khan or Kahn in Mongolia means leader of a clan.
Iam a hindu but this man is a pseudo historian
Genghis khan didn't conquered India because he had some sort of sympathy towards india is bullshit😂😂😂😂😂
If he had sympathy he would have freed india from turks rule😂
Mongolia mein ab tamatar nhi hote... hume bhejne padege...
Aur gobi bhi...
woh toh pahli bhi nahi tha....mongol nomadic log ha zydatar meat or dairy se khake survive karte hai. Ab modern age mein ake city me log vegetables or rice ye sab khate hai
Completely bias perspective. Always bashing Alexander and painting Genghis Khan as a saint. I like both but you can't study history and not wince when hearing what Genghis Khan would do in war. Alexander was a child compared to Genghis when it came to destruction.
His descendant Babur conquered India, and Mughals literally became the greatest Indian empire ever
Lol 😂
Babur considered himself as a timurid rather than a mongol
@@vatsalpantand Timur considered himself from the lineage of great khan
@@thearch4162 psychology and biology are different subjects. Timur and babur can think anything what they want . This thread had a different beginning I guess. Plus timur never wrote a diary so it's very difficult to gauge what he thought of himself.
No ‘hard evidence’ of that.
This guy brought Chavda, "sab kuch jantaa bhai"... This is totally inaccurate description of Genghis khan...
Bhai hindi me nahi milega kya..
Why don't you make branches of your own TH-cam channel like Telugu tamil kannada and other languages
👍
17 Mongol deployment head crushed by khilijii elephant . Mongol capture little part of Punjab and Kashmir vinod Khanna Rajesh Khanna why they look little Chinese . And mostly Hindu think the Mongols are loyal to Hindu no totally wrong
Hahahahahaha
He is Praising Mongols out of His Hatred for the Chines and even Despairing Khurazm out of his hatred for Muslims and Aurangzeb Rulling India.....
THANK You Soooooo much Jinnah.....❤
😮
Worst explanation of Genghis khan
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
K2A 🚨
Wrong history Jin sakai the Ghost of tshumia defeated the Mongols 🤐
Isn't ghost of tshumia the a virtual computer game.
Aap ek baat batao ! Interviews
Hindime kahe nehi lete ho ?
Sabko samajme aajati ! English kitne
percentage logo ki thikse samajme
aati hai ?
Log jada interested hote na, Samja koro
This guy is trying to sympthis a monster who killed and destroyed millions of people shame on you
Read more history books 📚!
Mongols offer all : follow great khan empire or against as you’re die
That's how less you know about history.
Do you thing during an invasion people will be sitting in the side eating popcorns. Ofcourse if you have to dismantle a nation first dismantle it's populace. Our indian kings killed each others and your great ashoka killed.. every king only think about his nation nothing else. Justice only exist for your own people. And often chengiz khan retaliated not invaded. His entire conquest of China is retaliation.
He didn't just almost conquered India, his bloodline _Mughal_ basically RULED over India!
Bhai mughals were not mongols. Read Babur: The Chessboard King
Book by Aabhas K. Maldahiyar
Agree with you. Mughals are mix breed of Turks and Mongols.
@ElN246 what a hypocrisy.
@@sikasbkoju3715 who were Turks? Turkish language started in mangolia what are you talking about man
@@notofyourneed5728 according to your logic, everyone in the Indian subcontinent is a Hindu
Safe
Both of your education is questionable. Period.
yeh aadmi historian nahi hain, isko mat bulaao
A Mongol named Akbar and his decedents also ruled India for a while.
Historians cast doubt whether Mugals are relate to Mongols. Babur claimed his Bloodline to Timur. This might be true but do you know that there is no Proof that Timur is direct Bloodline of Genghis Khan ?
TImur simply claimed this without any Proof. Some say Timur was a Bastard child of an Illegitimate affair between Some Mongol Warlord and Turkic woman and was ashamed of his Ancestry and tried to cover this up by claimging to be a Descendant of Kublai Khan, Who was popular at that time.
Lol Mughal's Never Called Themselves Mongol
But Taimurid And Mughal's Were Mostly Defeated By Locals
They Had Collab With Local King's ✌️
There was no india there was no country before 1947 😂 ur country was boen in 47 and just adopted this name also "india" and all other names were given to us 🇵🇰 the lanf of Sindhu river ko😂
Bharatvarsh that is India comes from Vedas Our Temples Older than yr Cult Religion 😂
Looks like you learnt history in a madarsa. Real real history. Bharat is the oldest name of India. There was no such thing called "Islam" before 600 A.D.
This Indian “Historian” guy.. Muddling up all the historical facts about the Mongol Empire. He can't remember Genghis Khan’s actual name! Needs to do better mate 😅
Temujin, now find kagaz
Btw there was no india before 1947 jsut a divided subcontinent in the rule of empires
No. Bharat existed way before islam was created. India came into being during the British regiment.
@@Ishbr Bharat never existed and India was given to us 🇵🇰 all other names too all names came from "Sindhu" river
@@arhamsheikh9346 ashoka s empire
@@arhamsheikh9346 sindhu (indus) also lie in india
@@mamtasingh2703 Nah that's kashmir IOK
Rtta maara hai bnde ne bhai
This guy talking any crap
According to thos bro . Mongolia was not a nation then. Why is he not saying the same about india at the time . The concept of india also did not exist then .
Jambu dweepa , Mehula , aryavart are some of the names foreign visitors of ancient India called it. Aryavart and Jambu dweep is also mentioned numerous times in our ancient scriptures.
Megasthenes in ' Indica' clearly mentions the whole as India , not just one particular region . It was kind of present center ( chakravarti) and state system( rajya).
Kindly get your facts right.
@@k.devika1595 by throwing in some fancy names you are trying to prove you are a knot it all. Bro the concept of ancient India is false . As a culture it extended to Afghanistan you may argue but each king held his territory it was not a country with same laws . Just a group and BORDERLESS .
@@dailyhacks4634 Gosh! You are one of those I see. It's all written my friend......the evidence exists whether you like it or not .
And simply because you aren't well read, do not cast the same aspersions on me. I have read the Indica, Huang Tsang descriptions of india as well as various ' smritis' and ' intihasa'. Of course to the ignorant these all will sound like ' Fancy words '.
And you say there were no laws. The whole of india followed specific rules during hostile events like wars too. It's clear you haven't a lick of what your talking. Do continue, it's futile arguing with the ignorants with arrogance...... who enjoy to be a rut of stupid assumptions, rather than doing the simple job of actually READING the said book.
According to your madarsa history, the concept of India didn't exist but the concept known as Bharat existed for thousands of years. Bharat is the oldest name of India.
@@k.devika1595 yes I am one of those mate . The issue with throwing names as you have is to prove your point you are sticking to one time zone . For instance huna empire went from parts of UP to Iran . So we cannot safely say this is one country . Mughals never truly made it to parts of tamilnad or srilanka so thier rules did not apply in these southern parts why? Because it wasn't one nation . To justify saying I ready hyung sang hence I know everything is a fools errand
Brainwashed historian 😂
Yess definitely, he is not a madrachaap like u.
Alauddin khilji is the only indian king who defeated Mongols and proetected india ...But not for once Alauddin kihlji literally defeated Mongols 9 times ...and his uncle Jalauddin kihjli also counter attacked Mongols at the Time the Genghiz khan were The empeoror of Mongol empire ...
Literally this two super powers Preotected The India from Brutal Mongole ...So indian should thankfull to this two Sultans of India ❤
Mamluk Turk not indian😂😂
Mamluk Turks and mongols come from same Altai origin.
Everyone is historian these days on social media😂
He didn't conquer because of the smell and dirty streets.
Say something that makes sense ... Otherwise people will just call you dumb and move on..
He was not talking of China here… pay attention.
But the bloodlines of Genghis Khan - The Mughals did, and they ruled over India!
First let ur people decide there gender 😂
Makes no sense