The reason for that 4000 set on the MCP is that’s the missed approach altitude. We set that at the Final approach fix after we cross check the far crossing altitude. Basically that’s the altitude we going to initially climb to in the event of a missed approach.
Whats a 'far crossing altitude '? Can you not set the missed approach altitude and heading after glideslope capture? When is the earliest those can be set?? Maybe when less than the missed approach altitude? M
He meant FAF, or Final Approach Fix crossing altitude, if I'm not mistaken. Once you put the airplane on approach mode and it joins the glideslope that supersedes any selected altitude set in the MCP, so you just set the next appropriate altitude. @@markcardwell
Years ago, I was flying (pax) into ORD from some departure city in the East. The time of year and conditions of this video remind me of it. Somewhere still over Lake Michigan, it felt as if the pilot dialed in the glide path perfectly as we just gradually descended on idle engine power at a constant rate until touchdown. Straight course, steady descent rate. I've never experience that kind of landing before or since and I have traveled the planet many times. I will miss the 757.
I’ll miss it, too. Boeing’s big mistake in not continuing with this marvelous aircraft in favor of constantly adapting a 60s design in the 737. There is nothing like a takeoff in a 757.
im amazed how bumpy it is up front .. Boeing needs to work on building quality aircraft such as these again . .wow .. my mother retired with Boeing in Everett Wa. in 94 circa . i used to work for a sub contractor in early 90's also .. better times back in those days for Boeing .. they have to improve their quality and safety systems now . sad to say their image is tarnished
Very interesting....no minimums, no callouts until they got the 50.....was this because it was a visual approach? When you fly a visual in by hand, are the other earlier callouts disabled?
@@flying9249,,,thanks, I never realized that about the call outs but it explains why you see so many different variations in call outs in the videos on here. I would say the airlines that go for the bare bones avionics to save money are cheap...and potentially unsafe. The MCAS on the Max 8, now that was definitely Boeing's fault for offering a "cheaper" option without redundant sensors, but really was due to the fact they totally screwed up their hazard analysis of the design.
Kuranggi. Kecepatan Pesawat Boieang Bus Kuranggih Anggin. Pesawat. Boieang Bus .USA. RI. Bandara. John. Knedchy. USA. Bandara. Juandah. RI. USA. Laut. Jawah. Laut. Lepas. Surabaya.
If I am a transitioning pre-operative, hormone supplementing, born male- with fantasies of flying for the airlines with an ATP and FAA First Class Medical, statistically suicidal- can I still be an airline pilot too?
Touch down zone? What’s that? Ahh that’s right, it doesn’t matter to “professional aviators.” The landing itself wasn’t too smooth, either. Not surprising in today’s hiring climate. 🤦🏻♂️
@V1AbortV2 now I typically ignore troll comments like yours but this one I have to interject. First, that landing WAS in the touchdown zone (barely). The 757-300 is a bit of a pig to grease because of its length and tailstrike threat. You obviously have zero experience with ORD where even greased landings are ruined by terrible runways. That kid who landed is flying for a US legacy while in his 20s and will retire a multimillionaire. I just posted one of my 757-300 landings from back when I was on the fleet for you to dream about while playing flight simulator living in your mom’s basement. th-cam.com/video/Edo0laS-uJ4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=xvQg1Lm21F_tQVNf
![[LAST ONE] B777 JFK 🇺🇸 New York | LANDING 04R | 4K Cockpit View | ATC & Crew Communications](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6MADRBeTbfM/mqdefault.jpg)
The reason for that 4000 set on the MCP is that’s the missed approach altitude. We set that at the Final approach fix after we cross check the far crossing altitude. Basically that’s the altitude we going to initially climb to in the event of a missed approach.
thank you
Whats a 'far crossing altitude '? Can you not set the missed approach altitude and heading after glideslope capture? When is the earliest those can be set?? Maybe when less than the missed approach altitude? M
I didn't ask
And what do you mean "we"?
He meant FAF, or Final Approach Fix crossing altitude, if I'm not mistaken. Once you put the airplane on approach mode and it joins the glideslope that supersedes any selected altitude set in the MCP, so you just set the next appropriate altitude. @@markcardwell
this aint the place to troll lmao@@thegrandmuftiofwakanda
The 57 is a joy to fly. A bit noisy depending on the recirc fans, but once you figure out the gotchas, its an awesome place to work.
757 is hands down my favorite plane
Years ago, I was flying (pax) into ORD from some departure city in the East. The time of year and conditions of this video remind me of it. Somewhere still over Lake Michigan, it felt as if the pilot dialed in the glide path perfectly as we just gradually descended on idle engine power at a constant rate until touchdown. Straight course, steady descent rate. I've never experience that kind of landing before or since and I have traveled the planet many times. I will miss the 757.
I’ll miss it, too. Boeing’s big mistake in not continuing with this marvelous aircraft in favor of constantly adapting a 60s design in the 737. There is nothing like a takeoff in a 757.
damn microsoft flight simulator getting more and more realistic
Are you kidding ? Not even a single cloud in the sky, just a plain grey block there… :)
@@ObsidianParis Obviously X-Plane graphics
@@falsonix-vh5qo look at xenviro and then cry "bu-bu msfs is betar"
Good job!😊
Congratulations to all the scientists and engineers at Boeing for yet another successful landing.
@@flying9249
" and i fly the 737 "
No you don't.
What is your pfp
@@Zmix777 You mean what is your Ph.D, surely.
99.8 percent of landings are hand flown in all transport category airplanes.
Floated like crazy and didn't follow glideslope whatsoever.
Great video. I hate ORD, but great video. I love flying the 757 and 767.
실제로 보니깐 웅장하네여 ^0^ 밍키아빠 잘보고 갑니다
nice, really like the view from your office!
757 is the only plane that pinned me in my seat on takeoff.
im amazed how bumpy it is up front .. Boeing needs to work on building quality aircraft such as these again . .wow .. my mother retired with Boeing in Everett Wa. in 94 circa . i used to work for a sub contractor in early 90's also .. better times back in those days for Boeing .. they have to improve their quality and safety systems now . sad to say their image is tarnished
ORD = O’Hare International Airport
The 757, the sports car of the sky.
Love the 757. Too bad Boeing underestimated its belly cargo capacity needs when it was designed or there would be a helluva lot more flying today.
Nice video!
Anybody getting tired of these cokpit videos of planes landing? No? I don't either!
As @citationmax1 would say, “Greased it!”
B757
I love the magical left turn on the 757
Beautifull video
Whatever happened to “approaching minimums” “minimums” “continue”?
re-todd, re-todd.......
Very interesting....no minimums, no callouts until they got the 50.....was this because it was a visual approach? When you fly a visual in by hand, are the other earlier callouts disabled?
I wouldn't think so just guessing. I always wondered that
Yes, at my company we do not set minimums on a visual approach so no call out.
depends on the operator. at alaska there are NO auto call outs. you wouldnt even hear 50 etc. its all operator specific as boeing is very cheap.
@@flying9249,,,thanks, I never realized that about the call outs but it explains why you see so many different variations in call outs in the videos on here. I would say the airlines that go for the bare bones avionics to save money are cheap...and potentially unsafe. The MCAS on the Max 8, now that was definitely Boeing's fault for offering a "cheaper" option without redundant sensors, but really was due to the fact they totally screwed up their hazard analysis of the design.
I miss my old friend.
7 yrs. Me too.
Is it RNAV approach?
Had the approach mode selected. You can't do that on an rnav approach. Don't think the 75 can do IAN approaches.
ILS 28C but disconnected once runway was in sight and hand flew from then on.
ILS
ILS, flight director shows G/S and LOC
Why was the MCP altitude set so low?
Thats the go-around alititude for the ILS 28C into ORD. So its "low" but appropriate.
SOP for that company.
@@prorobo literally the go around altitude. what would you set
@@mporio101 he’s talking about the 700 which is set in the beginning of the video. That’s TDZE.
@@prorobosurprised you didn't go around. Almost landed outside the landing zone.
Kuranggi. Kecepatan Pesawat Boieang Bus Kuranggih Anggin. Pesawat. Boieang Bus .USA. RI.
Bandara. John. Knedchy. USA.
Bandara. Juandah. RI. USA.
Laut. Jawah. Laut. Lepas.
Surabaya.
If I am a transitioning pre-operative, hormone supplementing, born male- with fantasies of flying for the airlines with an ATP and FAA First Class Medical, statistically suicidal- can I still be an airline pilot too?
Well, suicide risk is already a no go. If you're going to go off the medicine, you will get your FAA Med Cert, but check with the regulations.
Yes but be sure to be 100% honest in the job interview
@Enzoxvx is that supposed to be some sort of joke?
@@TB-um1xz No of course it’s 100% cereal, you should apologize
@@Enzoxvxfor what? You being wrong?
I've done that a hundred times in MSFS.
haha!!!!!
Yup, sandboxes are alot of fun, till poo poo needs to go pee pee.
Touch down zone? What’s that? Ahh that’s right, it doesn’t matter to “professional aviators.” The landing itself wasn’t too smooth, either. Not surprising in today’s hiring climate. 🤦🏻♂️
@V1AbortV2 now I typically ignore troll comments like yours but this one I have to interject.
First, that landing WAS in the touchdown zone (barely). The 757-300 is a bit of a pig to grease because of its length and tailstrike threat. You obviously have zero experience with ORD where even greased landings are ruined by terrible runways. That kid who landed is flying for a US legacy while in his 20s and will retire a multimillionaire.
I just posted one of my 757-300 landings from back when I was on the fleet for you to dream about while playing flight simulator living in your mom’s basement.
th-cam.com/video/Edo0laS-uJ4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=xvQg1Lm21F_tQVNf
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burn_centers_in_the_United_States
yeah well let me see then@@prorobo
I fly R/C