ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2019
- antnie.com | / antnie
In my first adapting vintage lenses video I take a look at 3 Olympus OM Zuikos lenses : 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8 & 35-70mm f/3.5-4.5
Pricing & Availability:
OM 28mm f/2.8: ebay.to/3h67D43
OM 50mm f/1.8: ebay.to/2WoVwHf
OM 35-70mm: ebay.to/3h71RyP
Find an OM lens adapter here: amzn.to/2OHIJes
Music Kevin Macleod - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
I occasionally use the excellent Olympus 24mm f2.8 lens on my old Oly OMD E M5 mk1 with some great results which are better than the original kit len from 2014. Yes the 12-45 f4 Pro lens on my OMD E M5 Mk2 is better, as it should be, but it is nice to relive the OM1 manual focus film camera days. The images have that certain quality. Nice to see you are enjoying your legacy lenses.
Gran trabajo!
Tengo Olympus M10 MK2, Zuiko 28mm f2.8, Zuiko 50mm f1.8, Minolta 35-70mm f3.5 constante y algunos más aparte de los típicos del sistema M4/3. Tienen mucha calidad, creo que es lo mejor si quieres ahorrar dinero, pero los objetivos de kit de mi Olympus son más nítidos, pero no luminosos. Personalmente el 28mm f2.8 me encanta, quizás porque en micro 4/3 se aprecia como 56mm, más cercano al típico 50mm, además desde f2.8 es muy nítido, sin embargo el Zuiko 50mm es más luminoso, pero menos nítido a máxima apertura, prefiero cerrar a f2.8, así mejora el contraste, la nitidez y los negros son más precisos, a f1.8 se obtiene un bokeh muy bonito y por supuesto luminosidad. Son increíblemente pequeños y me encanta la posición de la anilla de apertura.
Un saludo
I am shooting primarily with manual focus Minolta lenses (on my Sony A7) but the few Olympus lenses which I am using are fantastic. Sharp and outstanding colors with a great handling.
Affordable and incredible image quality!
Hello! I just liked and subscribed to your channel. I have a question. I’m an old time Olympus film camera guy. I have still have some lenses from when I was using film. What digital cameras should I be looking at in order to use my Om Zuiko lenses? Thank you!!
Could you show the vignetting on the 35-70mm? Is it really bad?
Will u upload more circa videos
Thanks for the nice video. You spurred me to get out my old OM 200, 28, 50, and 100 lens from fifty years ago. WHAT adaptor would I need to use these vintage lens on the new Olympus OM-1 which has just been announced??? Thank you in advance
OM to MFT I believe.
Thanks!
Молодец отличные фото и ценная информация.
I just got the same 28mm and 50mm plus a 75-150mm f4, very nice lenses for the price!
Congrats. Are you going to be using them on a digital camera or a film camera?
@@Antnie Digital, 5D mkii
Thanks for taking out the time, could you please do a video on Nikon + vintage
You betcha, though my next Adapting Vintage Lenses video is already in the works. So after this next one I’ll get some Nikon glass to play with.
Noooiiice
Hey i wanna know if the om lens 35-70mm compatible with lumix gf9 ? .. Or have to use adapter?
Use OM to M4/3 adapter
hi , how does one adapt the 28 mm OM to Nikon Z6 ?
You’ll need an OM to Nikon Z lens adapter. Should be about $10-20
Circa!!!!!
are you still gonna do amazon unboxing videos
It is possible, though I don’t have any planned right now
@@Antnie i do a bunch of mystery amazon unboxings on my channel you should check them out
hmmm Leica iiia in the back? Looks like mine ;3
Hello Antnie. For more information about the Olympus OM Zuiko range, see: www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/olympusom1n2/shared/zuiko/index.htm .
Please make more circa cat videos
Hows she doing these days
Lots of pictures of her in my newest video :)
6:58 how does having a smaller sensor make the lens behave differently? The only difference is the shot will be cropped. Yes, if you move the camera back to achieve the same framing as a FF sensor, then yes, you will have more DOF (less "BOKEH"). But if you leave the camera right where it is, it will be the exact same shot, just cropped.
A smaller sensor does not make the lens behave differently; it only crops the projected image, as you point out. A 50mm f/1.8 lens has a focal length of 50mm and an entrance pupil of 50/1.8 = 28mm, no matter what sensor is behind it. So the physical image it projects does not change.
However, people usually care less about the intrinsic physical characteristics of a lens, and more about _what their final image will look like_, which is a combo of lens AND recording medium (crop). Focal length is used as an indirect proxy for field of view, so many photographers understand what a 50mm photo will look like (46.8° on the diagonal) - but specifically, on full frame.
On 1.53x APS-C crop sensor, of course the field of view will be different, because we are cropping. But rather than standardize on e.g. a literal angle spec, we point out that our 50mm lens on APS-C will render an image with the same angle of view (~31.5°) AS IF we were using a ~77mm lens on full frame (~31.5°). So we say that "mounting the 50mm lens on APS-C yields a lens equivalent to 77mm on full-frame". Because photographers already have an intuition for what 77mm looks like (on FF).
So far, so boring, I know. But here's the kicker: many people seem to not realize this same logic ALSO applies to aperture, at least as far as background blur goes.
A 50mm f/1.8 lens on full frame renders a certain angle of view, and a certain amount of background blur. A crop sensor cuts that image down to the center portion ("77mm FF equivalent"), but does NOT change the content of that center portion optically. So what am I talking about with respect to aperture here?
Well, before, we said that a 50mm f/1.8 lens on FF becomes "equivalent to" a 77mm lens when mounted on APS-C. BUT, here is the very important bit - it does NOT become equivalent to a 77mm f/1.8 lens. A 77mm f/1.8 lens would have a physical entrance pupil of 77/1.8 = ~43mm, which is quite big! Such a lens, if it exists, would have massive background blur - much more than our lens actually produces.
But our 50mm f/1.8 lens does NOT have such a large entrance pupil. Its entrance pupil is still 50/1.8 = 28mm, not 43mm. So it would be a very big mistake to say our 55mm f/1.8 lens renders the same image on APS-C as a 77mm f/1.8 lens would render on FF.
If the "FF-equivalent lens" for a 50mm f/1.8 mounted on 1.5x crop factor APS-C is 77mm (to match the same angle of view), what is the equivalent _aperture_ our hypothetical lens would need in order to render the same amount of background blur in our final image? Turns out it is 1.8 * 1.53 = f/2.8. A 77mm f/2.8 lens has a physical entrance pupil of ~28mm, same as we started with.
So to hammer the point home, the following lenses produce images with the same angle of view and the same degree of background blur:
- On APS-C, a 50mm f/1.8 lens
- On Full Frame, a 77mm f/2.8 lens
So when we mount our 50mm f/1.8 lens on a 1.53x APS-C crop sensor camera, we speak loosely and say "the crop sensor makes the lens act like a 77mm f/2.8 lens". What we really _mean_ is "the final image we record using this 50mm f/1.8 lens on APS-C will be the same angle of view and background blur as if we used a 77mm f/2.8 lens on full frame". But that is a mouthful.
The physical image in light projected by the lens has not changed at all, we are just cropping it. But the label we use as a proxy to describe the image we will see in the recorded image by the sensor DOES change, so long as photographers understand physical lens specs in terms of the image they produce on a FF sensor, instead of in terms of angle of view and absolute entrance pupil size.
I hope this has helped cleared up the issue.
@@gabedamien Wow, that was a lot. You could have just said: If you have a FF and and APS-C and use the exact same lens, and put them on the same tripod without moving it. THEN if you crop the FF picture so it matches the APS-C. You will literally have the exact same shot.
Or: if you take a shot with a full frame camera, then you tape off the sensor to make it aps-c sized. Then crop your original FF shot. They will be exactly the same shot.
@@urwholefamilydied yes… but that doesn't explain why we say that an Xmm f/y lens on APS-C renders the same image as a 1.53Xmm f/(1.53y) on full frame, which is what I was trying to explain.
@@gabedamien I think you're just explaining it in a complicated way. Even your reply to me took me a second to get. Yes, it's as simple as taping off a FF sensor with masking tape to APS-C size. If you compare that shot to an actual APS-C size with the same lens, the shots will be identical. Do you disagree?
@@urwholefamilydied I don't disagree. Do you disagree with the statement that a 50mm f/1.8 lens when mounted on APS-C renders the same image as a 77mm f/2.8 lens would on full frame?