More random stuff added to the files which is more likely to come in in the new year since it hasn't made it to this update. Spicy Missiles all over the place
i think the Kfir with Python 4s can be a test for the next gen Fox-2 missiles (AIM-9x, IRIS-T, ASRAAM, R-73M/R-74, MICA-IR, PL-10-IR). We would see those brought to more vehicles in one of the next updates in march or june alongside the F-18 and Su-30MK. The R-73 was famously brought to us with the Su-25BM event vehicle as well and the fact, that the game is not ready for those kind of missiles never stopped Gaijin to add comparable stuff to the game in the past.
a French Rafale pilot was asked a question.. -which was the most challenging (aircraft to fight) ? “The F-16 is pretty cool. Typhoon is a joke, very easy to shoot. "
@@tukino9124 oh well you just have to trust that french pilot, I'm sure he is very objective and impartial. He surely isnt trying to shit on the Eurofighter just because their precious french pride was shattered when Dassault wasnt put in charge of the Eurofighter's program as they requested.
@@bzorf_tng Oh damn I guess we had enough proofs with exercise and various test at which they both attended ? As a frenchman we more hate on the USA and Europe, so how can he compliment the F16 but absolutaly trashtalk the typhoon ? How can a single company among associates within France can make a better jet than the whole Europe combined ? lol + we lowkey left because Dassault lowkey has the French aura and mindset, and cause you wanted a more heavy and less versatile aircraft, and y'all have no damn aircraft carrier so why would we team up with countries that can't even throw their jet with cataputls ?
@@tukino9124 The rafale is objectively worse in every aspect as a an aircraft including air to ground. France has no equivalent to the brimstone or even maverick which is. A huge gap in capability
3:34 So they modeled the Stormbreaker with the ARH seeker radio cover? Interesting... It could be the IR seeker instead though... edit: It really seems like an radio cover for the ARH seeker. If I'm right, the IR transparent cover would be mounted in the same place as the SAL seeker, but in this datamined model the SAL/IR seeker is covered entirely. It is the same thing with the ARH brimstone. edit 2: This model can also be the GPS guided version, as one of the versions has three seekers, with IR+SAL+ARH guidance.
I think it combines GPS for INS as well as Laser/IR/ARH. This thing would be really powerful, especially when you consider that the F-15E can take potentially over 20 of them at once
@christopherchartier3017 Yeah. This first version that appears on the video, without that grey cover seems like the ARH/IR/SAL seeker, just as the dual mode brimstone, but Gaijin maybe is planing to do the same as the brimstone: only a SAL version. The model on the 3:34 is suspicious though, they maybe are considering A-G weapons with ARH seeker, if they're not doing a GPS guided only.
@@noobhue1997 I’d honestly prefer if it was only an IR guided bomb anyways, since the Fire and Forget function of the multi-mode seeker is VERY valuable.
@@christopherchartier3017 They can do two versions, one with the SAL and the other with IR. And yeah, if in game you could carry 20 of those IR guided, easily the F-15E surpasses the Su-34 on CAS power. Even more if they are considering making one version of these with a ARH seeker only. Shit would be so broken. But it would be more cautious if they tested first the power of radar guidance on A-G weapons with the Su-39, as it can guide vikhrs using the radar. Very unreliable because it seems one of those things Gaijin forget they added in the game. I suggested changes, on the forum, that would make the radar guidance on the Vikhr usable, but now there's people claiming it is a bug.
@@noobhue1997 Yeah, I figured the Vikhr would have that capability. Gaijin’s reasoning about pure mm wave radar guided munitions, like say the hellfire-L, is that it can track through smoke. Which I happen to think is pure BS, since the Vikhr can already do that so long as the person firing remembers where the tank was in the smoke plume. Also Griffith did nothing wrong >:^)
The one that has 2 different colour is a 250kg bomb from the french with the gbu kit, it literally says MBDA, how so no, its not going to the US. Most likely to some french jet
No. The Python 4 entered service for the IDF/AF in 1992 while the AIM 9X entered in 2003 for the USAF and USN. The Python 5 would be closer to the AIM 9X but War Thunder is not ready for either of them with their basically unflareable IRCCM technology. Israel has lots of domestic ordinance that Gaijin refuses to give
They will never add that for the United States it'll most likely go to China first knowing how giant gaijin is... just like the AGM114 lemmas.. why don't we have those? When we have spikes?? why does the new premium hstvl Is an exact copy and paste from the html with fake statistics and a nerfed reload rate But the 2s38 we got to make sure it fires 100 rounds a second. Obviously that's an exaggeration but this game is complete junk I quit buying anything from war thunder two years ago all of my money goes into buying Actual assets on dcs
@@pogotf block 1 9X could be added right now and would be equal to the R-73. no, it is not as strong as you think, you're thinking of the block 2 or 3, not the block 1.
The portrayal of the United States in this game is frustratingly simplistic and inaccurate. It feels like a mere copy-and-paste job that fails to capture the true essence of American military capabilities. While other nations have advanced significantly in military technology, the U.S. seems to be stuck in a time warp, reminiscent of the late 90s. There are countless vehicles that could enhance the U.S. representation, yet the game continues to underperform in this area, resulting in a disappointing 33% win rate. One has to wonder if this bias stems from historical events, such as American forces engaging with Russian troops in Syria or our support for Ukraine. It raises questions about the motivations behind these design choices in War Thunder.
The American low winrate is exclusive to GRB. They’re perfectly fine in ARB, and have been since the amraam dropped. I know because I main USA. The low winrate in GRB isn’t because any of their weapons are bad or behind, but because there’s too many top tier premiums like the clickbait, the AIM, and now the RDF/LT. New players buy these tanks and then die in them because they aren’t used to the top tier play style (which is another issue entirely). They’re then left with either low tier tanks which end up being a detriment to even spawn in, or just back out entirely after one death. US teams end up just getting outnumbered soon after this, and the more experienced players get overwhelmed by too many 2a7’s or the unlimited T80 spam (which is also another issue). The M1A2/SEP/V2 are fine for top tier, they’re just not meta. Sure, the SEP v3 would’ve been nice to have but they’re not the reason why the US sucks.
@@christopherchartier3017 You are absolutely right; there are numerous factors at play here, so let’s break it down. While we have access to Hellfires, we lack the fire-and-forget capability. The SEP V3 boasts enhanced armor against kinetic threats and includes a laser warning receiver, which would elevate the Abrams to the same level as other contemporary battle tanks in the game. The decision not to incorporate this feature speaks volumes about the game's direction. The United States has faced significant challenges in short-range air defense, and while they attempted to remedy this with lower-tier vehicles, I find myself rarely playing at that level anymore. The RDF/LT is another glaring example of how War Thunder has misrepresented American ground forces, as it fails to accurately reflect the statistics across the board. Where are the Stryker SHORAD and LAV-25? What about SLAMRAAMs? The game claims to prioritize historical accuracy, yet it misrepresents vehicles like the high HSTVL, which is known to have a fire rate of 90 rounds per minute, far superior to the 15-second interval currently depicted. In a puzzling move, War Thunder decided to severely nerf that weapon while ensuring the 2S38 remains historically accurate. Moreover, the recently released premium vehicle for the U.S., the HTVL copy, lacks upgraded armor as either a modification or a standard feature. It feels like a mere copy-and-paste job with little effort involved, while the BMD-4M receives all the modern enhancements and is dominating the battlefield. You’re correct that American air RB is performing better, but the majority of players are focused on ground RB. It seems that every effort has been made to render the United States as ineffective as possible at the top tier.
@@FXIIBeaver Absolutely! Want to know the reason? If it weren't for America, not a single country in Europe would exist as it does today. Russia would have complete control over you. How many nuclear weapons do you possess? What about aircraft carriers or stealth jets? yeah, sit boy...
That’s not why it was removed. It was removed because you could literally cruise missile bases in ARB and gaijin didn’t like players abusing the mechanic to effortlessly grind. Because they hate fun.
Well yeah, do you see these in the game? No, so no outrage is needed. The grom could steal bases from everyone in air rb which would be stupidly unfair, hence why it was removed.
@@RT42069 uhhh no. python 4 and 5 are both able to circle around for the target. their seekers and upper body are the same. All the python 5 improved was the burn rate/time and acceleration of the missile allowing it to go further and last longer in the air. its why when people talk about the python 5 it typically gets banned with the python 4 due to how similar they are.
i just hope that the kfir get more stuff like this for air nad more stuff for ground cuz the BR for air is ok if they are going to give him stuff like this but we nead to see the raddar first but to have only 2 LASER bombs at 12,7 ground is criminal like look at mirage RMV at 12,0 bruh and so on..
More random stuff added to the files which is more likely to come in in the new year since it hasn't made it to this update. Spicy Missiles all over the place
Another difference from the python 3 and 4 is the python 4 almost DOUBLES the G limit of the python 3 at around 60-65 Gs
Is that the one that can do a 180 deg turn?
@ yes and more
So 50-62%?
python 4 has 70-80 G while python 5 has 80 to 90G
@@courage04and python 5 can do 360s very reliably, theres also a theoretical python 6 which was transferred to the I-Derby-ER project
i think the Kfir with Python 4s can be a test for the next gen Fox-2 missiles (AIM-9x, IRIS-T, ASRAAM, R-73M/R-74, MICA-IR, PL-10-IR). We would see those brought to more vehicles in one of the next updates in march or june alongside the F-18 and Su-30MK. The R-73 was famously brought to us with the Su-25BM event vehicle as well and the fact, that the game is not ready for those kind of missiles never stopped Gaijin to add comparable stuff to the game in the past.
I think Gaijin will introduce a super powerful SPAA than encounter these bombs
Omg typhoon with ASRAAM will be a absolute menace only thing that i have to be worried is a f15 at light speed anything else are just bodies
a French Rafale pilot was asked a question..
-which was the most challenging (aircraft to fight) ?
“The F-16 is pretty cool. Typhoon is a joke, very easy to shoot. "
@@tukino9124 oh well you just have to trust that french pilot, I'm sure he is very objective and impartial.
He surely isnt trying to shit on the Eurofighter just because their precious french pride was shattered when Dassault wasnt put in charge of the Eurofighter's program as they requested.
@@bzorf_tngcope
@@bzorf_tng Oh damn I guess we had enough proofs with exercise and various test at which they both attended ?
As a frenchman we more hate on the USA and Europe, so how can he compliment the F16 but absolutaly trashtalk the typhoon ?
How can a single company among associates within France can make a better jet than the whole Europe combined ? lol
+ we lowkey left because Dassault lowkey has the French aura and mindset, and cause you wanted a more heavy and less versatile aircraft, and y'all have no damn aircraft carrier so why would we team up with countries that can't even throw their jet with cataputls ?
@@tukino9124 The rafale is objectively worse in every aspect as a an aircraft including air to ground. France has no equivalent to the brimstone or even maverick which is. A huge gap in capability
3:34 So they modeled the Stormbreaker with the ARH seeker radio cover? Interesting... It could be the IR seeker instead though...
edit: It really seems like an radio cover for the ARH seeker. If I'm right, the IR transparent cover would be mounted in the same place as the SAL seeker, but in this datamined model the SAL/IR seeker is covered entirely. It is the same thing with the ARH brimstone.
edit 2: This model can also be the GPS guided version, as one of the versions has three seekers, with IR+SAL+ARH guidance.
I think it combines GPS for INS as well as Laser/IR/ARH. This thing would be really powerful, especially when you consider that the F-15E can take potentially over 20 of them at once
@christopherchartier3017 Yeah. This first version that appears on the video, without that grey cover seems like the ARH/IR/SAL seeker, just as the dual mode brimstone, but Gaijin maybe is planing to do the same as the brimstone: only a SAL version.
The model on the 3:34 is suspicious though, they maybe are considering A-G weapons with ARH seeker, if they're not doing a GPS guided only.
@@noobhue1997 I’d honestly prefer if it was only an IR guided bomb anyways, since the Fire and Forget function of the multi-mode seeker is VERY valuable.
@@christopherchartier3017 They can do two versions, one with the SAL and the other with IR. And yeah, if in game you could carry 20 of those IR guided, easily the F-15E surpasses the Su-34 on CAS power.
Even more if they are considering making one version of these with a ARH seeker only.
Shit would be so broken.
But it would be more cautious if they tested first the power of radar guidance on A-G weapons with the Su-39, as it can guide vikhrs using the radar. Very unreliable because it seems one of those things Gaijin forget they added in the game.
I suggested changes, on the forum, that would make the radar guidance on the Vikhr usable, but now there's people claiming it is a bug.
@@noobhue1997 Yeah, I figured the Vikhr would have that capability. Gaijin’s reasoning about pure mm wave radar guided munitions, like say the hellfire-L, is that it can track through smoke. Which I happen to think is pure BS, since the Vikhr can already do that so long as the person firing remembers where the tank was in the smoke plume.
Also Griffith did nothing wrong >:^)
will all the AESA radar planes in wt they better add the mitsubishi F-2 in the next 2 updates
Hope to see the Python 4 in the game ive been waiting for this one for so long
GBU-53???
HOLY SH
YEAAAAAAA
16 inch battleship?? That's tiny
If we go one patch without SPICE or POPEYE im finna crash out for real (no cap)
huh..
no "WE ARE DOOOMED!! THE END OF WAR THUNDER AS WE KNOW IT!!1!" title ?
are you feeling well TEC ? ;D
CBEMS bomb are just standard mk80 series bomb built by mbda for carrier operation it should be used by rafale M and Super Etendard Modernisé only
The one that has 2 different colour is a 250kg bomb from the french with the gbu kit, it literally says MBDA, how so no, its not going to the US. Most likely to some french jet
Shits bout to get real with the gbu 53, as an american main imma start praying for other nations at top tier
Aim9x when gaijin?? 😂
No. The Python 4 entered service for the IDF/AF in 1992 while the AIM 9X entered in 2003 for the USAF and USN. The Python 5 would be closer to the AIM 9X but War Thunder is not ready for either of them with their basically unflareable IRCCM technology. Israel has lots of domestic ordinance that Gaijin refuses to give
@@pogotfcould be worse they could add ASRAAM’s
@@pogotfthe 50g thrust vectoring MICA is already in the game and it has unflarable radar homing technology
They will never add that for the United States it'll most likely go to China first knowing how giant gaijin is... just like the AGM114 lemmas.. why don't we have those? When we have spikes?? why does the new premium hstvl Is an exact copy and paste from the html with fake statistics and a nerfed reload rate But the 2s38 we got to make sure it fires 100 rounds a second. Obviously that's an exaggeration but this game is complete junk I quit buying anything from war thunder two years ago all of my money goes into buying Actual assets on dcs
@@pogotf block 1 9X could be added right now and would be equal to the R-73. no, it is not as strong as you think, you're thinking of the block 2 or 3, not the block 1.
with the multi-mode guide system of the stormbreaker, this is gonna be nuts 😆 unless ofc Gaijin decides to fuck it up.
If they add A2SM of 1000 kg they need to add the Rafale f4
Can someone explain to me why they didn't add pzh2000 to Italy?
because the Hungarian version is there but they will surely add it in the future
One of them would be free in the tech tree and one of them would be 50€. What would you want people to get if you were Gaijin?
Meteor????
why are they slacking so heavily on Israeli weaponry?
The portrayal of the United States in this game is frustratingly simplistic and inaccurate. It feels like a mere copy-and-paste job that fails to capture the true essence of American military capabilities. While other nations have advanced significantly in military technology, the U.S. seems to be stuck in a time warp, reminiscent of the late 90s. There are countless vehicles that could enhance the U.S. representation, yet the game continues to underperform in this area, resulting in a disappointing 33% win rate. One has to wonder if this bias stems from historical events, such as American forces engaging with Russian troops in Syria or our support for Ukraine. It raises questions about the motivations behind these design choices in War Thunder.
The American low winrate is exclusive to GRB. They’re perfectly fine in ARB, and have been since the amraam dropped. I know because I main USA. The low winrate in GRB isn’t because any of their weapons are bad or behind, but because there’s too many top tier premiums like the clickbait, the AIM, and now the RDF/LT. New players buy these tanks and then die in them because they aren’t used to the top tier play style (which is another issue entirely). They’re then left with either low tier tanks which end up being a detriment to even spawn in, or just back out entirely after one death. US teams end up just getting outnumbered soon after this, and the more experienced players get overwhelmed by too many 2a7’s or the unlimited T80 spam (which is also another issue).
The M1A2/SEP/V2 are fine for top tier, they’re just not meta. Sure, the SEP v3 would’ve been nice to have but they’re not the reason why the US sucks.
@@christopherchartier3017 You are absolutely right; there are numerous factors at play here, so let’s break it down. While we have access to Hellfires, we lack the fire-and-forget capability. The SEP V3 boasts enhanced armor against kinetic threats and includes a laser warning receiver, which would elevate the Abrams to the same level as other contemporary battle tanks in the game. The decision not to incorporate this feature speaks volumes about the game's direction.
The United States has faced significant challenges in short-range air defense, and while they attempted to remedy this with lower-tier vehicles, I find myself rarely playing at that level anymore. The RDF/LT is another glaring example of how War Thunder has misrepresented American ground forces, as it fails to accurately reflect the statistics across the board.
Where are the Stryker SHORAD and LAV-25? What about SLAMRAAMs? The game claims to prioritize historical accuracy, yet it misrepresents vehicles like the high HSTVL, which is known to have a fire rate of 90 rounds per minute, far superior to the 15-second interval currently depicted. In a puzzling move, War Thunder decided to severely nerf that weapon while ensuring the 2S38 remains historically accurate.
Moreover, the recently released premium vehicle for the U.S., the HTVL copy, lacks upgraded armor as either a modification or a standard feature. It feels like a mere copy-and-paste job with little effort involved, while the BMD-4M receives all the modern enhancements and is dominating the battlefield.
You’re correct that American air RB is performing better, but the majority of players are focused on ground RB. It seems that every effort has been made to render the United States as ineffective as possible at the top tier.
its a Russian company, what do you expect
US main detected.
@@FXIIBeaver Absolutely! Want to know the reason? If it weren't for America, not a single country in Europe would exist as it does today. Russia would have complete control over you. How many nuclear weapons do you possess? What about aircraft carriers or stealth jets? yeah, sit boy...
So the Grom was Op when it was just a GNSS glide bomb (useless in ground) but people don't bat a eye with these munitions... What a joke.
That’s not why it was removed. It was removed because you could literally cruise missile bases in ARB and gaijin didn’t like players abusing the mechanic to effortlessly grind. Because they hate fun.
honestly, stuff like the AASMs are more like the KH-38 than the GROM. (kh-38 are mach2 still)
@@christopherchartier3017 it took over 15 minutes to get to a base from spawn..... Most games end in under 8....
@@dragonlord2451 Bro- don’t tell me that, Tell gaijin
Well yeah, do you see these in the game? No, so no outrage is needed.
The grom could steal bases from everyone in air rb which would be stupidly unfair, hence why it was removed.
Missile
AIM-260 when? 😂
python4 with aim9m should be fine come on bruh
python 4 can literally hit a u turn to hit targets.
@phantomraptor8851 that's the python 5, which is basically a 9X on blow
@@RT42069 uhhh no. python 4 and 5 are both able to circle around for the target. their seekers and upper body are the same.
All the python 5 improved was the burn rate/time and acceleration of the missile allowing it to go further and last longer in the air.
its why when people talk about the python 5 it typically gets banned with the python 4 due to how similar they are.
hello
Where is R-77-1
bhobishhot e
Misile
i just hope that the kfir get more stuff like this for air nad more stuff for ground cuz the BR for air is ok if they are going to give him stuff like this but we nead to see the raddar first but to have only 2 LASER bombs at 12,7 ground is criminal like look at mirage RMV at 12,0 bruh and so on..
NO more modnern stuff its bad
Where is the meteor missile? LMAO
not coming
nothing for the Eurofighter even in the files ? ... id love some Mavericks or anything fire and forget ..
Yeah atleast get the AGMs that already exist in game
Where is our MICA-IR ?!
check behind u!
More no-brainers on top-rank with 2 clicks...
Womp womp play a lower BR
@@40rollsonly no brainer detected....
@@SuperTitoneli no skill detected, go play reserve arcade lil bro
@@40rollsonly sure 👌
welcome to modern combat, son