Thanks for the review. As a former X-T2 shooter and current G9 shooter, it confirms a lot of what I have found. For me, ironically, besides the IBIS, it was the Fuji lens selection that motivated me to move to Panasonic/m43. As mainly a zoom shooter, the Leica F 2.8-4.0 trio is as near to perfect as I have ever seen and they all balance beautifully with the G9.. Fuji currently offers no 24-105mm or 24-120mm option at all, and the fast 24-70 and 70-200 equivalents are huge, heavy and horribly unbalanced with the X-T3 body. I think you, maybe more than any other reviewer, understand that "user experience" is at least as important as image quality. Let's be honest, all these new cameras provide wonderful image quality, and only with pixel peeping will we see difference. Since I'm not paid for my photographs, my enjoyment of the experience is much more important to me than the differences at ISO 6400. Thanks again.
You're welcome, if you don't fast lenses to compensate for the crop factor, M43 lens selection is indeed great. User experience is definitely very important.
" Since I'm not paid for my photographs, my enjoyment of the experience is much more important to me than the differences at ISO 6400" So true- couldn't have said it better!
Just wanted to mention that while I haven't used it, the fuji xf 18-135mm is gonna be pretty close to your 24-120mm requirement. It's not really to my tastes though, I would personally prefer the 16-55 or 18-55 xf as an all around workhorse supplemented by any of the telephoto zooms or primes. Their 16-80 f/4 is also due sometime in 2019. Both Fuji and MFT systems are great regardless.
I'd agree. I owned the 18-135 when I was shooting Fuji and for me it fell more into the travel lens category.Totally arbitrary, but to me the 12-60 is my every day and the 14-140 is my travel lens, but that lens epitomizes my issues with Fuji zooms and was one of the main reasons I left Fuji. While it was ok, it was definitely "not the sharpest knife in the drawer".Rather like the Sony E 18-135. Exact same focus range, aperture range and including IS. The Fuji however is 1cm longer, 1 cm larger in diameter and weighs 160g more than the Sony. To say it balanced poorly with the X-T20, which was my travel body, would be generous. The grip didn't help because it didn't leave enough room between the barrel and the grip, for anybodies fingers. It was just passable on the X-T2 as long as you added the accessory grip. (the Area-Swiss one, not the battery grip).Not to mention, almost 2x the weight of the Lumix 14-140mm II, with a shorter focal range, and in my opinion, opinion, optically inferior. Just my 2 cents.
Hi James. Well, obviously the preference of one system, body, ergonomics, and "balance" over another, is quite subjective indeed. As a Fuji X-System user, I find that the X-T3 WITH Grip, provides an excellent "balance", at least for the XF16-55 f/2.8, XF55-200 f/3.5-4.8, and the supremely sharp XF80mm f/2.8 Macro! Enjoy whatever gear you use, and Happy 2019!
Excellent job. I don’t think there is a bad camera out there any more. Because people aren’t comparing cameras or output when they see a print hanging on a wall it is purely the the shot, the work of the photographer, the processing, how it’s framed and lit.
Thanks for this honest review. A G9 owner. The IBIS is great and was a major selling point for someone who backpacks and bikes. No need to gimbal or tripod. Less overall weight. Coming from a G7, I noticed right away the IQ superiority of the G9. I do like the Fuji though, but since one camera is what I will be using, the G9, especially when shooting video hand held. Love it!
Hopefully you'll respond as this is years old, but you said you used this handheld did you ever find it too heavy if you used it to record video while walking?
The interesting paradox here is that it turns out that the XT3 is a LOT better hybrid video camera than anyone thought that it would be!! And that what leads to the thought process of a comparison between the XT3 and the GH5. But, I believe that you would essentially come to the same conclusions, just slightly different ones. I am not sure it is worth your time. I am also interested in how you do your excellent voice overs from an equipment and process prospective. Your level of quality is outstanding and has been very consistent over time. Thanks
Yes, that is truth, the GH5 is closer match, but I unfortunately didn't have both at the same time. I am actually trying to improve the sound quality, there are some problems with echo and essing, but I will make a video about that one I figure it out.
One thing the Panasonic can do is perfect blur free still frame from 4k video this applies to all Panasonic cameras with 4k. The stills from a Fuji are always blurred so I might be moving back to Panasonic from an X-T2. I had a Sony a6300 that also wouldn't do good 4k stills.
thank you for such an honest review, made to your usual high standards. Seems to me that if the x-t3 had IBIS, it would be a clear winner, not only against the G9 but would also take some market share from the Sony a7iii
You're welcome, it would probably be bigger camera with the IBIS, more expensive and it would mean higher requirements for the internal of the camera, so that would be a compromise. X-H1 with IBIS is similar but I didn't take much of a market share from Sony.
With the new firmware this November, the G9 will be amazing for video work. I am so tempted to buy one since here in France the body is less than 1100€.
The XT3 really caught my eye. Not a huge fan of the screen's hinge design, but those features packed into a $1500 body is really hard to beat. If they had made a proper flip screen for it, I'd sell a good amount of gear to get it. And the XF 16-55mm? I drooled a little bit.
Yes it was, very much. However, I still did not make up my mind about which camera to buy in 2019. What pushes me away from the XT3 is the lack of stabilization and the socalled watercolor and wormy effects often visible in distant detail, like foliage. Also I do not like that Fujis underexpose at the same iso settings compared to other brands. G9's drawback is its sensor size and sensor aspect ratio, which pulls me more towards the XT3, unless a metabones (or alternative) speedbooster works well enough on the G9 to compensate for its sensor size. Do you know if a speedbooster significantly deteriorates autofocus in video, in the G9? I remember seeing a video of yours where you say that it does!? Adding a speedbooster would also further increase the Price of the G9, almost to the level of the A7III and Z6. For now, the Z6 is I think my favorate choice, but I will wait until Sony releases their rumored A7000 (mini A9) and Panasonic releases pricing info on their 24MP full Frame model (S1).
What an excellent summary: thoughtful, respectful that everyone's opinion/choice need not be the reviewer's, intelligent presentation, great production values. This channel has to be in the top 1% of youtube channels for serious discussion of photography and gear. Thank you for treating us like adults!
Good reminder of G9's high res mode when looking at other cameras with 45 megapixels. Nice to know detail is there for landscape like medium format. The in body stabilization was a good move by Panasonic as hear reviews complain about other recent releases making the brand feel behind because of that trend.
The Happy Hour Hound For some it might be a problem but others are using this for purpose on waterfalls and rivers because it looks like a long time exposure.
Thank you! I really wanted to see this comparison. As you said, XT3 will be a better choice if you work in a controlled environment and for serious video color grading and flexibility but in my opinion G9 still enjoyable and have a more convenient menu and handling but the must important thing is that both of this cameras can get the job done without compromise.
@@bisibela My point is that for photographers who work mainly with their cameras on tripods (at studios, landscape photography, astrophotography, etc), IBIS is not a relevant feature.
Thanks for sharing. I chose the G9 because of IBIS and its exceptionnel handling. When you compare the weight of both cameras with lenses, the advantage is for the G9 too. And when I look at the image quality of my G9 and my wife's XT2, it is roughly equivalent, but IBIS allows much more sharp pictures.
I really enjoyed your review. After seeing reviews of the Olympus OM series micro 4/3 cameras, I think the Lumix G9 is a very underrated camera. It sure held it's own in your comparison even though for video the XT3 went slightly ahead. But I've seen reviews on the Lumix also and as I recall it was introduced more like a stills camera than for video. I sold my gear and I have no camera right now, but after watching your review, the G9 is very tempting since I'm not really into video. The in-body stabilization, as well as the lenses, really demonstrated that one can overlook the deficiency in the G9's higher ISO ranges since it permits you to use lower ISO's. Very nice review.
Thank you, it is indeed underrated, Panasonic is not very good at marketing. G9 is definitely a great camera for stills, but so is the X-T3 and X-T30 so it also depends on the lenses are your preferences.
@@TheHybridShooter - I am intrigued with video, but I still shoot mainly stills and create prints. From that standpoint, the G9 may be all the camera I really need. I have held both cameras, and agree the G9 has an edge in handling, but the X-T3 ergos are good too. They're just different. The only concern that I really have regarding the G9 is the magenta cast that some are getting when recovering shadow detail. I believe that the antidote to that would be to get the exposure correct in the first place. Question: Do you find that XT-3 files to be more malleable? Meaning, is there much more dynamic range captured by the X-T3 sensor than the G9...
Great review. Thanks! Having both cameras, I agree with your conclusions. Both are great, fun to shoot, provide excellent results. For me, it just comes down to which is more fun to use, and that can vary from day to day.
Man, thank you so much for your reviews. They helped me make a purchase recently (G85). After seeing this video, I'm confident the G9 will be a good upgrade once I'm ready to go for it.
Interesting review. In my opinion we are at the point in technology where the differences in actual output of these cameras are essentially the same within the boundaries of the expertise level of 90% of the photographers using these cameras. The main differential therefore is ergonomics and personal preferences. Considering the performance levels of these cameras, even the price is of little to no concern. Of all the cameras that you own and have tested, which one do you walk out the door with on a normal, non professional type of day? Thanks again for the review and keep them up!!!
I have a g85 / g7 and a bunch of native lenses. Come bonus time I'm going to sell the g7, kit lens, and 45-200. I think g85 with 15 1.7 / 42.5 1.7 / 12-35 is a sweet video set up but thinking about xt2 with kit lens and 35mm f2 to go along with it
Ryan Thomas I have or have owned an EM5ii, G85 & GX85. For lenses the 17 1.8, 25 1.4, 45 1.8, 75 1.8 & 12-40 2.8. I also have an X-T2 and a few Fujicron lenses. For me, the Fuji wins with fast action tracking and low noise files during events shot in low light. I realize that I don't have the latest and greatest in MFT anymore - or Fuji - but if I was to start again for what I shoot would have the X-T3 as my main camera. Five years ago when I bought my first MFT camera, Olympus had the only IBIS. Shortly after Panasonic came out with the first decent 4k consumer hybrid cameras. A lot has happened in the camera world since 2013 when I got into mirrorless. I still love MFT and have some great MFT gear, but in 2018 my desert island 1 brand or 1 camera setup would be Fuji hands down. It will take you a while to get used to the classical all-manual dials set up, but I think you will really like the experience and the files.
Your reviews are always highly appreciated and anticipated. You present extremely well and are extremely informative without apparent bias. Thanks very much and keep up the good work.
Special deal on G9 in Australia just now, comes with free battery grip from Camerahouse. I got mine with an Olympus 12-100 lens. I spent less than the price of a Canon EOS R or 5D anything body.
Another great review William. The G9 package of Leica 12-60 & 50-200 is about 3795 USD new. The X-T3 package of Fujinon 18-55 kit & 55-200 is about 2498 USD. The A7 III package of Tamron 28-75 & Sony 24-240 is about 3796 USD. Would you agree that that comparison makes for a compelling advantage to the X-T3 on the budget side and the A7 III on the performance side?
Thank you! that price comparison is not very suitable, since the 50-200mm Leica is in different league than Fuji 55-200 and Sony 24-240mm. G9 + Leica 12-60 and Lumix 45-200 would be better match and it is about 2500 USD so G9 and X-T3 are both great value. A7 III is great value as well, but there is not budget friendly 100-400ish mm lens available.
I use Canon fullframe camera, used sony and now Olympus. For my perspective the IBIS and size of body+lens is realy the best of the m43. I enjoy a lote the Ibis in photo with 1s or 2s without blur andd for video it's a must have If you don't want carry everything. With Ibis I let my tripod, monopod in my car.
Thank you for this video! I love her so much. I have a question and I hope you can help me: As an "enthusiastic" photographer I am hesitating to switch from my GX80 to a Panasonic G9 or Fuji XT2. I want to be able to have a better climb in iso, tropicalization and a better grip for when I go on an adventure. I might rarely need video for study projects. I do street, portrait, vacations and student nights. I am in love with the grip and all the benefits of the G9 but I wonder if it is really worth 1000 euros. I do not have big zoom and these "good" tele zoom on this system also cost 1000 euros. It's a lot of money. On the other side the XT2 and its super sensor leaves me in shock. I love the pictures that come out of this case. And the 55-200 is good and cheaper than equivalent m4 / 3. But the handle is smaller, the battery is worse, no IBIS, no articulate screen ... I'm afraid I miss it. I can not decide between image quality and handlink. I know that you love the G9 but in my case, do you have an opinion to help me decide? Or another camera? Thank you :)"
I've just sold a GX8 and GX80 and bought an X-T2 with 18-55 lens plus battery grip. I changed because the highest frame rate in 4k video on PAL Panasonics is only 25fps.this causes jitter on fast moving objects like cars or trains. So I went for the X-T2 which has a top frame rate of 30fps with 4k video this cured the jitter but I have now lost the ability to stop blur free motion in video which is something all Panasonic MFT cameras can do very well. So I am now looking at changing for a Panasonic G9 which shoots 4k at 50fps and 60fps I will only need a body as I still have a new Leica Elmar 14-50mm f3.8 lens left over. I am going to try and find a cheap way of capturing blur free stills from video so I can keep the X-T2 but if not I will go for the G9.
Greetings, Hybrid Shooter! Very nice, thorough comparison between these cameras! As a Fujifilm X-T3 landscape and product photographer, I am extremely pleased with the image quality I get from this camera, combined with the stellar, sharp Fujinon XF optics. However, I am researching a small, light "travel camera", as I don't want to expose my X-T3 system to the vagaries of landscape photography in a beach/ocean setting. For that very limited, occasional use, I was considering such cameras as this Canon G5X, Panasonic Lumix LX100 II, Sony a6300, Sony RX100V. My MAIN criteria are image SHARPNESS and detail retention, and ability to retain such detail when possibly printed to 20x24". Plus, I'd like to keep total budget under $1000. And, FYI, I'm a 100% stills guy, so don't shoot video. Based on this, which system would you recommend for maximum sharpness/compact form factor? Thank you!
Hi! Have you tried to make a comparison between X-T3 and G9 after its latest update? Can the G9 with internal 10 bit 422 (even if it is Long GOP and 150Mbps bitrate) perform as well as the X-T30, or at least close to it, in your opinion? Thanks!
Just an excellent review. Thanks. This will change with the XT4 release at the end of the month, but the price of the G9 is attractive (and I love my Fuji X100F).
Thank you, it depends on your preferences, all have different strengths and it also depends on whether you can take an advantage of advanced video features of the X-T3.
The Hybrid Shooter That’s a good point! So I sold my trusty GH4 and have recently purchased the A7iii, but being a Panasonic user Im having a difficult time adjusting to the Sony system and userface and I’m really thinking I should’ve gone with a G9 or the GH5. I do about 50% vlog style video as you can see on our channel, and the other 50% portrait, fashion photography.
Having both the GX8 and X-T3, using them for different circumstances, I love them both and use them both. Panasonic is a bit more versatile due to IBIS and smaller lenses, XT-3 has great IQ and the Fuji 100-400mm is superb with it!
Hello my friend. Love your videos. I see you sometimes use luminar to edit. I am interested in the x-t3. I shoot with panasonic g85 now but would like to switch. My question is how is editing on luminar with X-t3 raw files. Thank you and keep up the great work. 😀
I moved from Fuji to MFT for the bigger choice of lenses and the expense of Fuji lens . My experience definitely favoured Fuji on quality across the board but it’s a luxury you can live with Even a Olympus om d em 10 iii with the 14-42 ez works extremely well as a travel camera while some use things like Ricoh gr or similar. Tho I’m in a dilemma at the moment wanting a set up more for wildlife Even the XT2 is a great camera but I think just to keep things compatible a G90 or G9 or OM D EM 1 mk ii also weather sealing maybe a + for those odd occasions I need it ( I have used all these in the past ) all great cameras .
Great video. I wish Fuji had put IBIS in their XT-3 lineup at this price level. X-H2 when it comes is going to be at the price level of Sony's A7III and Nikon's Z-6 which are full frame cameras and offer full frame 4k which makes X-H lineup less appealing.
Amazing stuff, thank you! I was almost ready to buy GH5, but I downloaded some 10bit sample footage of both GH5 and XT3 and FCPX has huge problems with the Pana AVC 10bit codec, but the Fuji 10bit, f-log, HEVC runs absolutely smoothly. So right now I`m stucked and dont know if it is not better to go XT3 way? But the IBIS of GH5 and lenses like Nocticron and 8-18mm are so good propositions for video, Im not sure I can get these type of lenses for Fuji. Any ideas about the codec situation? HEVC on GH5 is only available for HLG, right? thank you!
You're welcome, AVC is not suitable for editing, there is no reason to shoot in AVC. MOV, which is the most suitable format, works well on both GH5 and T-X3.
@@TheHybridShooter Oh yes, I downloaded .MOV files, but the internal codec is avc1. But i just googled out, that I have to transcode and optimize media inside FCPX and now it works ok. So I guess the GH5 is better option due to IBIS, battery life and lens selection..
Offtopic question - I have only been there once, in passing, but is the city in your videos Bratislava? i think I recognize the castle. Excellent review, BTW, thanks. I was waiting for someone to do exactly that, but yours is concise and covers exactly the points I am interested in.
Great review. I have one question though. As far as I have heard the X-T3 is still dimmer using the same exposure settings. I mean ISO 6400 on Fuji will look like ISO 4000 on Panasonic. Is this true ? If yes they are probaly the same when it comes to ISO performance ?
X-T3 is darker than Sony A7 III but the G9 is also a bit darker than A7 III in high ISO situations due to the lower dynamic range, but generally yes, X-T3 exposure is about 1/2 to 2/3 stop darker at given ISO. X-T3 is still cleaner than the G9 even after that compensation.
I unfortunately haven't had time to do that, but neither is perfect in this regard, the G9 is probably slower, but the X-T3 occasionally looses the face.
I am having a hard time choosing still. I really need your final word haha:). Can you please say which one is better for video? I have to buy it tomorrow.. *low-key about to go crazy with choosing a camera* haha. And what would you recommend: fx 16-80mm lens or fx 18-55. A 2500 czk difference between the two, but both are kit lens
Great comparison. If the G9 had most of its features inside the GX9 body, it would be my travel camera for sure. Not sure why Panasonic destroyed the GX range.
Thank you. Unfortunately, it is not possible to pack most of G9 features into GX9 size body at current state of technology because of the requirements on internal components and heat dispersion. Hopefully in a couple of years...
I recently started reviewing watches. Do you think the g9 focus will be good enough for when I handle the watch closely in front of the camera or I should go for a sony instead? Any advice will be highly appreciated. Thank you
Nice video as usual, but can you take another slow motion video with the xt3, because I understand that is a matter of preference but in some other videos other reviews they said that the video at 120fps in the xt3 has a good quality when you compare with Sony cameras, but I’m not really sure, as a suggestion I think it might be better if you compare two cameras using the same footage to the same objective in both of them, just a suggestion, you videos are really good and actually every time I want to upgrade I take a look of your videos, they are really helpful.
Thank you, I am aware of that, but I unfortunately only had the X-T3 for short period of time, so I wasn't able to take side-by-side shots. Hopefully I will get to revisit this topic in the future.
I am fairly new to photography and currently have a Panasonic fz330. I am looking at getting a G9 next year but want to know how the kit lenses on G9 compare to the fixed on the fz330 any ideas?
I love my G9 - and I bought it for the flippy screen (for light video work) - that being said - when out in the real world (when shooting street style) - a quick flip down and out screen is faster. Think I might buy a fuji (a used xt3 or an upcoming xt30) as a side camera at a later date. Fuji color science is top notch (their B&W tech is nice, as well). I will say - the high resolution mode on the G9 is amazing for studio photos - it's so good - you'll find all sorts of dust and scratches (in my own personal artwork - lol). Love your videos - thanks for all your hard work!
Hi, sorry just wanted to know, when G9 records 4K60, it will automatically stops at 10mins? Or it will continue to record but each file saved is only 10mins?
@@TheHybridShooter And the X-T3 is better for video than either of those. Do a youtube search for X-T3 vs. Sony A7 III, or X-T3 vs. G9 and you'll see the vast majority give the win to the Fuji. I know because I was recently in the market for a video camera and watched about a thousand video reviews, lol.
@@adamaj74 LOL, I made the most watched A7III vs X-T3 video on TH-cam, so I might know something about that :) X-T3 has better advanced video features, but that doesn't mean that it is necessarily better video camera for all types of use.
@@TheHybridShooter I know, I watched it. Well there are a couple others not explicitly title A7 III vs. X-T3 where they still do compare them along with other cameras that have more views. For still images, it's debatable, but for video, objectively, specs-wise, etc., the X-T3 is a better camera.
I will leave now due to quality and support issues the Panasonic side. May I ask when you have deceide for a G9 replacement wich Kamera you would take if you had the choice between Fuji x-t3, Sony A7iii or Canon RP? Focus is still but 4k should possible. What do you think? Thanks Jog
Hi, I need your help, please. I sold my whole MFT System G9 + xy and would like a new System, but I have no clue which FF or APSc. IBIS is helpful. So Sony A7xy (but I don't like handling much) but they have know so many good lenses, Nikon Z6 or Z7 (good handling but less nativ lenses), Panasonic S1 (wow but sooo expensive and not so many lenses yet, but I like my G9) or wait for Fuji X-H2 (I like Fuji but is APSc).... mmm. I am a hybrid shooter but 80% photo and 20% video. Thx a lot for any tips! Jog
To be honest, I can't tell you much more besides what you wrote, I just don't think that Nikon Z6 and Z7 has better handling than III and IV series A7 cameras. You always have to sacrifice something with every system...
The fuji is to small if you have big hands My sons g9 is great I am now regretting my x-t3 purchase I have xl hand my finger hangs an inch past the shutter button I can only hold it for a short time before my hands cramp Its very light but hard to hold If they would have made it bigger like the x-h1 I would keep it
@@ZJProductionHK The sensor is 4:3 and the video 16:9 so there has to be a crop at the top and bottom like on every other camera. No crop = full sensor width.
What are your custom settings for picture profile for the G9 and the G85? Looked through a bunch of videos, but can't seem find it other than the year old video. Wondering if your picture profile preferences have changed. Your videos are the best hands down on these cameras. Thank you
Thank you, for out of camera shots it is standard picture style, for video I use Cinelike D with no changes on the G9 if I don't intend to do much color grading, and natural on G85 / GX9.
The Hybrid Shooter ahh shame ok . Do you think now with ibis ,flippy screen and larger battery this is ideal ? I’m stuck between this gh5 and the new canon r6 to release .
I personally don't like flippy screens at all, so that is a downgrade for me, but the IBIS will be great addition. Sony will also have a big announcement next month.
When it comes down to size, cost and features. Mostly for photos and traveling with some videos. What would be your suggestion. Anyone can chime in and give me your thoughts. Thanks
Hello Hybrid Shooter! Thanks for the detailed review and comparison. I own a G85 with Olympus 12-40 and I am searching for an upgrade, especially when it comes to AF and video capabilities. I find it difficult to decide between the Panasonic G9 and the Fuji X-H1 . I primarily do 60/40 Video and I ignore the XT3 due to lack of IBIS which is very important for me. Considering price factors (G9 is 1750 with Leica 12-60 and Fuji XH1 is 2000 with 16-55), what would you recommend for video work with average color grading, real estate photography, landscapes and street. Thank you!
*Sony A7III vs Fuji XT3* - bit.ly/A7IIIvsXT3
*Fujifilm X-T3 Review* - bit.ly/XT3review
*Luminar 2018 Review* - bit.ly/Luminar2018THS Code: THS10
*Slovenská / česká recenzia Fuji XT3* - bit.ly/XT3recenzia
Hi, camere name, you video?)
How come you haven't linked your video here that compares the G9 with the Fuji XT3. That would bring some required perspective
This is the video that compares xt3 and g9, so I’m not sure what do you mean.
Thanks for the review. As a former X-T2 shooter and current G9 shooter, it confirms a lot of what I have found. For me, ironically, besides the IBIS, it was the Fuji lens selection that motivated me to move to Panasonic/m43. As mainly a zoom shooter, the Leica F 2.8-4.0 trio is as near to perfect as I have ever seen and they all balance beautifully with the G9.. Fuji currently offers no 24-105mm or 24-120mm option at all, and the fast 24-70 and 70-200 equivalents are huge, heavy and horribly unbalanced with the X-T3 body. I think you, maybe more than any other reviewer, understand that "user experience" is at least as important as image quality. Let's be honest, all these new cameras provide wonderful image quality, and only with pixel peeping will we see difference. Since I'm not paid for my photographs, my enjoyment of the experience is much more important to me than the differences at ISO 6400. Thanks again.
You're welcome, if you don't fast lenses to compensate for the crop factor, M43 lens selection is indeed great. User experience is definitely very important.
" Since I'm not paid for my photographs, my enjoyment of the experience is much more important to me than the differences at ISO 6400" So true- couldn't have said it better!
Just wanted to mention that while I haven't used it, the fuji xf 18-135mm is gonna be pretty close to your 24-120mm requirement. It's not really to my tastes though, I would personally prefer the 16-55 or 18-55 xf as an all around workhorse supplemented by any of the telephoto zooms or primes. Their 16-80 f/4 is also due sometime in 2019. Both Fuji and MFT systems are great regardless.
I'd agree. I owned the 18-135 when I was shooting Fuji and for me it fell more into the travel lens category.Totally arbitrary, but to me the 12-60 is my every day and the 14-140 is my travel lens, but that lens epitomizes my issues with Fuji zooms and was one of the main reasons I left Fuji. While it was ok, it was definitely "not the sharpest knife in the drawer".Rather like the Sony E 18-135. Exact same focus range, aperture range and including IS. The Fuji however is 1cm longer, 1 cm larger in diameter and weighs 160g more than the Sony. To say it balanced poorly with the X-T20, which was my travel body, would be generous. The grip didn't help because it didn't leave enough room between the barrel and the grip, for anybodies fingers. It was just passable on the X-T2 as long as you added the accessory grip. (the Area-Swiss one, not the battery grip).Not to mention, almost 2x the weight of the Lumix 14-140mm II, with a shorter focal range, and in my opinion, opinion, optically inferior. Just my 2 cents.
Hi James. Well, obviously the preference of one system, body, ergonomics, and "balance" over another, is quite subjective indeed. As a Fuji X-System user, I find that the X-T3 WITH Grip, provides an excellent "balance", at least for the XF16-55 f/2.8, XF55-200 f/3.5-4.8, and the supremely sharp XF80mm f/2.8 Macro! Enjoy whatever gear you use, and Happy 2019!
You are the one of the best Camera Reviewers on this platform , This is extremely informative and very detail ..
Thanks you
Thank you, I appreciate your feedback!
Excellent job. I don’t think there is a bad camera out there any more. Because people aren’t comparing cameras or output when they see a print hanging on a wall it is purely the the shot, the work of the photographer, the processing, how it’s framed and lit.
Thank you, although I would say that there are some new cameras out there that are significantly behind the competition and not worth buying.
@@TheHybridShooter like which cameras
@@moenlighted7681 anything new from Canon LOL :P
The Hybrid Shooter like Canon 🤣😂🤣
Hello Peter! Fancy seeing you here!
Thanks for this honest review. A G9 owner. The IBIS is great and was a major selling point for someone who backpacks and bikes. No need to gimbal or tripod. Less overall weight. Coming from a G7, I noticed right away the IQ superiority of the G9. I do like the Fuji though, but since one camera is what I will be using, the G9, especially when shooting video hand held. Love it!
You're welcome, IBIS is indeed great on G9, definitely one of my favorite features.
@@TheHybridShooter one question. The base ISO of G9 is 200. Is there any advantage to go to the extended ISO 100?
Yes, it minimizes magenta cast when recovering shadows, but there is not much difference.
@@TheHybridShooter thank you!
Hopefully you'll respond as this is years old, but you said you used this handheld did you ever find it too heavy if you used it to record video while walking?
The interesting paradox here is that it turns out that the XT3 is a LOT better hybrid video camera than anyone thought that it would be!! And that what leads to the thought process of a comparison between the XT3 and the GH5. But, I believe that you would essentially come to the same conclusions, just slightly different ones. I am not sure it is worth your time. I am also interested in how you do your excellent voice overs from an equipment and process prospective. Your level of quality is outstanding and has been very consistent over time. Thanks
Yes, that is truth, the GH5 is closer match, but I unfortunately didn't have both at the same time. I am actually trying to improve the sound quality, there are some problems with echo and essing, but I will make a video about that one I figure it out.
One thing the Panasonic can do is perfect blur free still frame from 4k video this applies to all Panasonic cameras with 4k. The stills from a Fuji are always blurred so I might be moving back to Panasonic from an X-T2. I had a Sony a6300 that also wouldn't do good 4k stills.
thank you for such an honest review, made to your usual high standards. Seems to me that if the x-t3 had IBIS, it would be a clear winner, not only against the G9 but would also take some market share from the Sony a7iii
You're welcome, it would probably be bigger camera with the IBIS, more expensive and it would mean higher requirements for the internal of the camera, so that would be a compromise. X-H1 with IBIS is similar but I didn't take much of a market share from Sony.
lol if the G9 had an apsc it would take a market share from Sony too, but it would all cost more
@@epicengines2565why apsc?
With the new firmware this November, the G9 will be amazing for video work. I am so tempted to buy one since here in France the body is less than 1100€.
Have you seen the info on the new Firmware 2.4? It does human and animal detect AF with more speed in detection.
The XT3 really caught my eye. Not a huge fan of the screen's hinge design, but those features packed into a $1500 body is really hard to beat. If they had made a proper flip screen for it, I'd sell a good amount of gear to get it.
And the XF 16-55mm? I drooled a little bit.
too bad 16-55 isnt IS
THE comparison I was waiting for! Thanks al lot Hybrid Shooter (for this and many other excellent videos)!
You're welcome, I hope that it was helpful!
Yes it was, very much. However, I still did not make up my mind about which camera to buy in 2019. What pushes me away from the XT3 is the lack of stabilization and the socalled watercolor and wormy effects often visible in distant detail, like foliage. Also I do not like that Fujis underexpose at the same iso settings compared to other brands. G9's drawback is its sensor size and sensor aspect ratio, which pulls me more towards the XT3, unless a metabones (or alternative) speedbooster works well enough on the G9 to compensate for its sensor size. Do you know if a speedbooster significantly deteriorates autofocus in video, in the G9? I remember seeing a video of yours where you say that it does!? Adding a speedbooster would also further increase the Price of the G9, almost to the level of the A7III and Z6. For now, the Z6 is I think my favorate choice, but I will wait until Sony releases their rumored A7000 (mini A9) and Panasonic releases pricing info on their 24MP full Frame model (S1).
What an excellent summary: thoughtful, respectful that everyone's opinion/choice need not be the reviewer's, intelligent presentation, great production values. This channel has to be in the top 1% of youtube channels for serious discussion of photography and gear. Thank you for treating us like adults!
Thank you, I appreciate your positive feedback!
You must love what Panasonic did with G9!
Good reminder of G9's high res mode when looking at other cameras with 45 megapixels. Nice to know detail is there for landscape like medium format. The in body stabilization was a good move by Panasonic as hear reviews complain about other recent releases making the brand feel behind because of that trend.
Yes, both High-res and IBIS are great stand-out futures of the G9 and even though it is possible to live without IBIS it is much less convenient.
Unfortunately it has a max shutter speed of 1 second! If you want to shoot high res waterfalls etc you are screwed.
The Happy Hour Hound For some it might be a problem but others are using this for purpose on waterfalls and rivers because it looks like a long time exposure.
@@darknessatn00n id like to see that
@Studd Muffin incorrect.
Thank you! I really wanted to see this comparison. As you said, XT3 will be a better choice if you work in a controlled environment and for serious video color grading and flexibility but in my opinion G9 still enjoyable and have a more convenient menu and handling but the must important thing is that both of this cameras can get the job done without compromise.
You're welcome, the IBIS makes a big difference, I will have to try X-H1 to see how it performs.
The Hybrid Shooter - yes please, i think it will be a more even competitor for the G9
IBIS is the key feature that makes the difference
For those who that feature is relevant.
Not really but okay.
Julio Areck Chang ibis is like being super rich... once u taste it, cant go back...all the mechanical workarounds disappear
@@bisibela My point is that for photographers who work mainly with their cameras on tripods (at studios, landscape photography, astrophotography, etc), IBIS is not a relevant feature.
Julio Areck Chang agree, for all those specialized genre of photography
Thanks to your in depth comparison, I'm now a proud owner of X-T3 and subscriber of your channel.
Thanks for sharing. I chose the G9 because of IBIS and its exceptionnel handling. When you compare the weight of both cameras with lenses, the advantage is for the G9 too. And when I look at the image quality of my G9 and my wife's XT2, it is roughly equivalent, but IBIS allows much more sharp pictures.
You're welcome, I hope that you are happy with the G9!
I really enjoyed your review. After seeing reviews of the Olympus OM series micro 4/3 cameras, I think the Lumix G9 is a very underrated camera. It sure held it's own in your comparison even though for video the XT3 went slightly ahead. But I've seen reviews on the Lumix also and as I recall it was introduced more like a stills camera than for video. I sold my gear and I have no camera right now, but after watching your review, the G9 is very tempting since I'm not really into video. The in-body stabilization, as well as the lenses, really demonstrated that one can overlook the deficiency in the G9's higher ISO ranges since it permits you to use lower ISO's. Very nice review.
Thank you, it is indeed underrated, Panasonic is not very good at marketing. G9 is definitely a great camera for stills, but so is the X-T3 and X-T30 so it also depends on the lenses are your preferences.
Thanks for this. I am considering both. Currently an M43 shooter with GX-8. It all comes down to preference, and I like both!
You're welcome, it indeed does, both are great cameras so it depends on how you will use it.
@@TheHybridShooter - I am intrigued with video, but I still shoot mainly stills and create prints. From that standpoint, the G9 may be all the camera I really need. I have held both cameras, and agree the G9 has an edge in handling, but the X-T3 ergos are good too. They're just different. The only concern that I really have regarding the G9 is the magenta cast that some are getting when recovering shadow detail. I believe that the antidote to that would be to get the exposure correct in the first place. Question: Do you find that XT-3 files to be more malleable? Meaning, is there much more dynamic range captured by the X-T3 sensor than the G9...
Jim BrennanPhotography - Thanks Jim. I thought of that option as well.
Great job again. One day people might realize sensor size isn't the only factor in a cameras overall performance!
Thank you, it indeed isn't.
Great review. Thanks! Having both cameras, I agree with your conclusions. Both are great, fun to shoot, provide excellent results. For me, it just comes down to which is more fun to use, and that can vary from day to day.
Excellent comparison. Imagine a Fujifilm camera that rivals a Panasonic in video. Just a few years ago this was unthinkable.
Thank you, yes that is truth, same as Panasonic rivaling Fujifilm in stills.
Man, thank you so much for your reviews. They helped me make a purchase recently (G85). After seeing this video, I'm confident the G9 will be a good upgrade once I'm ready to go for it.
Thank you, that is indeed very good upgrade path.
G90 looks attractive too.
@@ookiemandGreat to have all these choices isn't it?
Did you make the upgrade
The Fuji XT3 is on my shopping list
Interesting review. In my opinion we are at the point in technology where the differences in actual output of these cameras are essentially the same within the boundaries of the expertise level of 90% of the photographers using these cameras. The main differential therefore is ergonomics and personal preferences. Considering the performance levels of these cameras, even the price is of little to no concern. Of all the cameras that you own and have tested, which one do you walk out the door with on a normal, non professional type of day? Thanks again for the review and keep them up!!!
You're welcome, my personal camera for non-professional use is Panasonic GX9.
I have a g85 / g7 and a bunch of native lenses. Come bonus time I'm going to sell the g7, kit lens, and 45-200. I think g85 with 15 1.7 / 42.5 1.7 / 12-35 is a sweet video set up but thinking about xt2 with kit lens and 35mm f2 to go along with it
Ryan Thomas I have or have owned an EM5ii, G85 & GX85. For lenses the 17 1.8, 25 1.4, 45 1.8, 75 1.8 & 12-40 2.8. I also have an X-T2 and a few Fujicron lenses. For me, the Fuji wins with fast action tracking and low noise files during events shot in low light. I realize that I don't have the latest and greatest in MFT anymore - or Fuji - but if I was to start again for what I shoot would have the X-T3 as my main camera. Five years ago when I bought my first MFT camera, Olympus had the only IBIS. Shortly after Panasonic came out with the first decent 4k consumer hybrid cameras.
A lot has happened in the camera world since 2013 when I got into mirrorless. I still love MFT and have some great MFT gear, but in 2018 my desert island 1 brand or 1 camera setup would be Fuji hands down. It will take you a while to get used to the classical all-manual dials set up, but I think you will really like the experience and the files.
Your reviews are always highly appreciated and anticipated. You present extremely well and are extremely informative without apparent bias. Thanks very much and keep up the good work.
Thank you, I will do my best to keep it up!
Special deal on G9 in Australia just now, comes with free battery grip from Camerahouse. I got mine with an Olympus 12-100 lens.
I spent less than the price of a Canon EOS R or 5D anything body.
Please please do another Lumix G9 video, the new update boosted the G9's capabilities
I don't have the G9 anymore, so I am not able to do that.
@@TheHybridShooter what happened to it?:/
Another great review William. The G9 package of Leica 12-60 & 50-200 is about 3795 USD new. The X-T3 package of Fujinon 18-55 kit & 55-200 is about 2498 USD. The A7 III package of Tamron 28-75 & Sony 24-240 is about 3796 USD. Would you agree that that comparison makes for a compelling advantage to the X-T3 on the budget side and the A7 III on the performance side?
Thank you! that price comparison is not very suitable, since the 50-200mm Leica is in different league than Fuji 55-200 and Sony 24-240mm. G9 + Leica 12-60 and Lumix 45-200 would be better match and it is about 2500 USD so G9 and X-T3 are both great value. A7 III is great value as well, but there is not budget friendly 100-400ish mm lens available.
I use Canon fullframe camera, used sony and now Olympus. For my perspective the IBIS and size of body+lens is realy the best of the m43. I enjoy a lote the Ibis in photo with 1s or 2s without blur andd for video it's a must have If you don't want carry everything. With Ibis I let my tripod, monopod in my car.
Thank you for this video! I love her so much. I have a question and I hope you can help me: As an "enthusiastic" photographer I am hesitating to switch from my GX80 to a Panasonic G9 or Fuji XT2. I want to be able to have a better climb in iso, tropicalization and a better grip for when I go on an adventure. I might rarely need video for study projects. I do street, portrait, vacations and student nights. I am in love with the grip and all the benefits of the G9 but I wonder if it is really worth 1000 euros. I do not have big zoom and these "good" tele zoom on this system also cost 1000 euros. It's a lot of money. On the other side the XT2 and its super sensor leaves me in shock. I love the pictures that come out of this case. And the 55-200 is good and cheaper than equivalent m4 / 3. But the handle is smaller, the battery is worse, no IBIS, no articulate screen ... I'm afraid I miss it. I can not decide between image quality and handlink. I know that you love the G9 but in my case, do you have an opinion to help me decide? Or another camera? Thank you :)"
I've just sold a GX8 and GX80 and bought an X-T2 with 18-55 lens plus battery grip. I changed because the highest frame rate in 4k video on PAL Panasonics is only 25fps.this causes jitter on fast moving objects like cars or trains. So I went for the X-T2 which has a top frame rate of 30fps with 4k video this cured the jitter but I have now lost the ability to stop blur free motion in video which is something all Panasonic MFT cameras can do very well. So I am now looking at changing for a Panasonic G9 which shoots 4k at 50fps and 60fps I will only need a body as I still have a new Leica Elmar 14-50mm f3.8 lens left over. I am going to try and find a cheap way of capturing blur free stills from video so I can keep the X-T2 but if not I will go for the G9.
@@colinmcnab6145 What did you ever do? Still on FUJI?
Thanks for the video - it was very helpful for me! :) Looking forward to seeing next ones!
Greetings, Hybrid Shooter! Very nice, thorough comparison between these cameras! As a Fujifilm X-T3 landscape and product photographer, I am extremely pleased with the image quality I get from this camera, combined with the stellar, sharp Fujinon XF optics. However, I am researching a small, light "travel camera", as I don't want to expose my X-T3 system to the vagaries of landscape photography in a beach/ocean setting. For that very limited, occasional use, I was considering such cameras as this Canon G5X, Panasonic Lumix LX100 II, Sony a6300, Sony RX100V. My MAIN criteria are image SHARPNESS and detail retention, and ability to retain such detail when possibly printed to 20x24". Plus, I'd like to keep total budget under $1000. And, FYI, I'm a 100% stills guy, so don't shoot video. Based on this, which system would you recommend for maximum sharpness/compact form factor? Thank you!
I have a X-T2 and X-T20. But now most of the time I use Canon G7X Mark II.
I really like yr videos, details, comparisons. Your doing great job. Bravo
Thank you, I appreciate your feedback!
How does the new Fujifilm X-T4 compare vs the Panasonic G9 with the updated firmware for photos, video, image stabilization, controls and ergonomics?
I don’t know, I haven’t tested one yet.
Will you be getting the Fuji XT4? Looking forward to your findings if and when you do
I won't be getting one, but it is possible that I will get a sample for the review.
Hi! Have you tried to make a comparison between X-T3 and G9 after its latest update? Can the G9 with internal 10 bit 422 (even if it is Long GOP and 150Mbps bitrate) perform as well as the X-T30, or at least close to it, in your opinion? Thanks!
I haven't tried that yet.
Great video again man. Well done!
Thank you!
Great informative video thanks
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
Just an excellent review. Thanks. This will change with the XT4 release at the end of the month, but the price of the G9 is attractive (and I love my Fuji X100F).
Very curious to see you trying the X-T4... thanks for your video !
Could you redo this review when the G9 firmware update comes out this month with 10bit?
Unfortunately, I can't I don't have either of these anymore.
@@TheHybridShooter No problem just curious . Great videos keep up the good work ! cheers
Good job, well done.
I can't wait to see how well Pana's full frames compare early next year.
Thank you, neither can, but I will be able to test it pretty soon.
Thank you. This is one of my favorite videos that you have done. Both are excellent cameras
You're welcome, I'm glad that you like this video!
Another great video!! May I ask what you would choose between the A7iii/ X-T3/ and G9 for someone who shoots 50/50 video and stills?
Thank you, it depends on your preferences, all have different strengths and it also depends on whether you can take an advantage of advanced video features of the X-T3.
The Hybrid Shooter That’s a good point! So I sold my trusty GH4 and have recently purchased the A7iii, but being a Panasonic user Im having a difficult time adjusting to the Sony system and userface and I’m really thinking I should’ve gone with a G9 or the GH5. I do about 50% vlog style video as you can see on our channel, and the other 50% portrait, fashion photography.
Having both the GX8 and X-T3, using them for different circumstances, I love them both and use them both. Panasonic is a bit more versatile due to IBIS and smaller lenses, XT-3 has great IQ and the Fuji 100-400mm is superb with it!
Great comparison of the two cameras. Your experience of really using both cameras shows. 👍
Thank you!
Wow nice comparison and very informative !
Hello my friend. Love your videos. I see you sometimes use luminar to edit. I am interested in the x-t3. I shoot with panasonic g85 now but would like to switch. My question is how is editing on luminar with X-t3 raw files. Thank you and keep up the great work. 😀
I moved from Fuji to MFT for the bigger choice of lenses and the expense of Fuji lens . My experience definitely favoured Fuji on quality across the board but it’s a luxury you can live with Even a Olympus om d em 10 iii with the 14-42 ez works extremely well as a travel camera while some use things like Ricoh gr or similar. Tho I’m in a dilemma at the moment wanting a set up more for wildlife Even the XT2 is a great camera but I think just to keep things compatible a G90 or G9 or OM D EM 1 mk ii also weather sealing maybe a + for those odd occasions I need it ( I have used all these in the past ) all great cameras .
Good comparison. Maybe the best "hybrid" cameras on the market atm, outside of the expensive, FF models
Thank you, these are indeed some of the best hybrid cameras in category.
thanks the one ive been waiting for!
You're welcome!
Nice video and explanation! Out of subject: these castles are in Slovakia? I think i've recognised the "redstone" castle
Thank you, yes, it is Red Stone in Slovakia.
Excellent review. 2 great cameras. Likely the best of their formats.
Thank you!
love u videos as always. Could you please do a video how u shoot and edit and what gear you are using?
Thank you
The G9 has a great handling, I loved it to take with me, i wish my Sony A9 would have this body
Great video. I wish Fuji had put IBIS in their XT-3 lineup at this price level. X-H2 when it comes is going to be at the price level of Sony's A7III and Nikon's Z-6 which are full frame cameras and offer full frame 4k which makes X-H lineup less appealing.
Thank you, so do I. X-H2 could really be a great camera with X-trans 4 sensor and IBIS.
Thank you for another great video!
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
Does the amazing IBIS of the G9 means you can actually shoot in "lower" light than what the small M43 sensor would suggest?
Yes, but only if you shoot still subjects.
Amazing stuff, thank you! I was almost ready to buy GH5, but I downloaded some 10bit sample footage of both GH5 and XT3 and FCPX has huge problems with the Pana AVC 10bit codec, but the Fuji 10bit, f-log, HEVC runs absolutely smoothly. So right now I`m stucked and dont know if it is not better to go XT3 way? But the IBIS of GH5 and lenses like Nocticron and 8-18mm are so good propositions for video, Im not sure I can get these type of lenses for Fuji. Any ideas about the codec situation? HEVC on GH5 is only available for HLG, right? thank you!
You're welcome, AVC is not suitable for editing, there is no reason to shoot in AVC. MOV, which is the most suitable format, works well on both GH5 and T-X3.
@@TheHybridShooter Oh yes, I downloaded .MOV files, but the internal codec is avc1. But i just googled out, that I have to transcode and optimize media inside FCPX and now it works ok. So I guess the GH5 is better option due to IBIS, battery life and lens selection..
Offtopic question - I have only been there once, in passing, but is the city in your videos Bratislava? i think I recognize the castle. Excellent review, BTW, thanks. I was waiting for someone to do exactly that, but yours is concise and covers exactly the points I am interested in.
Yes, it Bratislava.
Great review/comparison. You are the best.
Thank you!
Great review. I have one question though. As far as I have heard the X-T3 is still dimmer using the same exposure settings. I mean ISO 6400 on Fuji will look like ISO 4000 on Panasonic. Is this true ? If yes they are probaly the same when it comes to ISO performance ?
X-T3 is darker than Sony A7 III but the G9 is also a bit darker than A7 III in high ISO situations due to the lower dynamic range, but generally yes, X-T3 exposure is about 1/2 to 2/3 stop darker at given ISO. X-T3 is still cleaner than the G9 even after that compensation.
Thanks. Did you compare Eye AF in continous focus mode on both ? Is X-T3 significantly ahead in this area ?
I unfortunately haven't had time to do that, but neither is perfect in this regard, the G9 is probably slower, but the X-T3 occasionally looses the face.
Getting a g9
I am having a hard time choosing still. I really need your final word haha:). Can you please say which one is better for video? I have to buy it tomorrow.. *low-key about to go crazy with choosing a camera* haha. And what would you recommend: fx 16-80mm lens or fx 18-55. A 2500 czk difference between the two, but both are kit lens
Take a look at my X-S10 review th-cam.com/video/Kdoc2Vp79ZI/w-d-xo.html that is probably better choice than both at the moment.
Great comparison. If the G9 had most of its features inside the GX9 body, it would be my travel camera for sure. Not sure why Panasonic destroyed the GX range.
Thank you. Unfortunately, it is not possible to pack most of G9 features into GX9 size body at current state of technology because of the requirements on internal components and heat dispersion. Hopefully in a couple of years...
XT3 vs a6500 vs a7iii is where I'm stuck.
i am probally gonna go with the xt3. wanted to wait till the a7s iii but its gonna be expensive..
@@pixelstudio8510 Wait for the a7000 announcement. It's coming really really soon. I can see it beating the a7iii in video, with better IBIS and 4k60.
Xt3 w/ 23mm is a can't lose
v3z A7iii. Full frame. Got all the things in it for professional work. And priced ok.
Xt3 with kits les 35mm f1.4 ( 1400 usd ) or a6400 with kit lens 16 55mm ( 862 usd ) ? Thank you
I recently started reviewing watches. Do you think the g9 focus will be good enough for when I handle the watch closely in front of the camera or I should go for a sony instead? Any advice will be highly appreciated. Thank you
No, that is very challenging task for AF, I recommend Sony or Canon for that.
@@TheHybridShooter thank you for the quick reply
Nice video as usual, but can you take another slow motion video with the xt3, because I understand that is a matter of preference but in some other videos other reviews they said that the video at 120fps in the xt3 has a good quality when you compare with Sony cameras, but I’m not really sure, as a suggestion I think it might be better if you compare two cameras using the same footage to the same objective in both of them, just a suggestion, you videos are really good and actually every time I want to upgrade I take a look of your videos, they are really helpful.
Thank you, I am aware of that, but I unfortunately only had the X-T3 for short period of time, so I wasn't able to take side-by-side shots. Hopefully I will get to revisit this topic in the future.
Hello friend have you tried the Panasonic 35-100 lens 2.8 ? Trying to get my first decent zoom. It will be on a g9
Only briefly, it is OK lens, but I don't like bokeh on that one too much.
I am fairly new to photography and currently have a Panasonic fz330. I am looking at getting a G9 next year but want to know how the kit lenses on G9 compare to the fixed on the fz330 any ideas?
I have never used fz330 so I can't tell you that.
I love my G9 - and I bought it for the flippy screen (for light video work) - that being said - when out in the real world (when shooting street style) - a quick flip down and out screen is faster. Think I might buy a fuji (a used xt3 or an upcoming xt30) as a side camera at a later date. Fuji color science is top notch (their B&W tech is nice, as well). I will say - the high resolution mode on the G9 is amazing for studio photos - it's so good - you'll find all sorts of dust and scratches (in my own personal artwork - lol). Love your videos - thanks for all your hard work!
Thank you, I also like both style of screens depending on what I am doing.
Hi, sorry just wanted to know, when G9 records 4K60, it will automatically stops at 10mins? Or it will continue to record but each file saved is only 10mins?
It will stop recording.
@@TheHybridShooter ok thanks
My question for U is
What camera would u use for ur future videos?
Depends on what kind of videos, but I use Sony A7 III and Panasonic G9 for video.
@@TheHybridShooter And the X-T3 is better for video than either of those. Do a youtube search for X-T3 vs. Sony A7 III, or X-T3 vs. G9 and you'll see the vast majority give the win to the Fuji. I know because I was recently in the market for a video camera and watched about a thousand video reviews, lol.
@@adamaj74 LOL, I made the most watched A7III vs X-T3 video on TH-cam, so I might know something about that :) X-T3 has better advanced video features, but that doesn't mean that it is necessarily better video camera for all types of use.
@@TheHybridShooter I know, I watched it. Well there are a couple others not explicitly title A7 III vs. X-T3 where they still do compare them along with other cameras that have more views. For still images, it's debatable, but for video, objectively, specs-wise, etc., the X-T3 is a better camera.
I will leave now due to quality and support issues the Panasonic side. May I ask when you have deceide for a G9 replacement wich Kamera you would take if you had the choice between Fuji x-t3, Sony A7iii or Canon RP? Focus is still but 4k should possible. What do you think? Thanks Jog
I would consider A7 III and X-T3, take a look at my comparison video: bit.ly/A7IIIvsXT3
@@TheHybridShooter thanks for the link...perfect, exactly what I am looking for. Really helpful and I guess I know my decission 😍
Hi, I need your help, please. I sold my whole MFT System G9 + xy and would like a new System, but I have no clue which FF or APSc. IBIS is helpful. So Sony A7xy (but I don't like handling much) but they have know so many good lenses, Nikon Z6 or Z7 (good handling but less nativ lenses), Panasonic S1 (wow but sooo expensive and not so many lenses yet, but I like my G9) or wait for Fuji X-H2 (I like Fuji but is APSc).... mmm. I am a hybrid shooter but 80% photo and 20% video. Thx a lot for any tips! Jog
To be honest, I can't tell you much more besides what you wrote, I just don't think that Nikon Z6 and Z7 has better handling than III and IV series A7 cameras. You always have to sacrifice something with every system...
@@TheHybridShooter OK, thx a lot. It helps already 👍😉
The fuji is to small if you have big hands
My sons g9 is great
I am now regretting my x-t3 purchase
I have xl hand my finger hangs an inch past the shutter button
I can only hold it for a short time before my hands cramp
Its very light but hard to hold
If they would have made it bigger like the x-h1
I would keep it
Will you be comparing G9 firmware 2.0 with XT-4 in the future?
No, but I will compare GH5 and X-T4.
Looking at getting one of these cameras. December 2019, which would you choose now that the G9 had a FW update
still 4k crop make me hesitate ... probably make me using 1080p, but then what's the point of getting G9
@@ZJProductionHK There is no 4K crop on G9.
@@TheHybridShooter I heard there is top and bottom cut? could you confirm, thanks mate
@@ZJProductionHK The sensor is 4:3 and the video 16:9 so there has to be a crop at the top and bottom like on every other camera. No crop = full sensor width.
Great comparison - great points -
Thank you!
What camera and lens did you use for shooting this video? Thank you.
I have used multiple cameras and lenses to shoot this - A7 III, A6500, G9 and GH5S with various lenses.
@@TheHybridShooter For example this shot th-cam.com/video/kEAztipqsmE/w-d-xo.html pls.
@@ukrstreet That was hot on Panasonic G9 + Leica 12-60.
Have you done a 4k60P video comparison between these two cameras? Would;d be nice with the new G9 firmware. Thanks
4K60p is the same in terms of the video quality as 25p on both cameras.
love your channel.
Subcribed.
Thanks for this informative video
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
Also a great watch the Omega Speedmaster.
Do you consider user experience and larger viewfinder big advantages?!
That is always relative, and it is also a matter of what suits your need better.
Would like to upgrade from d3400 to the G9 with a lens suitable of capturing good landscape images...is utva suitable camera for landscape??
Take a look at Fuji X-S10, that one is better for landscapes th-cam.com/video/Kdoc2Vp79ZI/w-d-xo.html
@@TheHybridShooter its not weatherproof : ( it has good ibis for handheld...maybe better with XT3?...
I prefer X-S10, but it depends on your presences.
@@TheHybridShooter Good grip and built in ibis for handheld...
I had G6, g7 and G85 and I did like the system, but AF is terrible.... Fuji color are superior, glass is much better and Xt3 Af is really good now.
Fortunately, the AF is completely different experience on the G9 in comparison with G7 and G85.
Which would be better for video, GH5 or XT3?
Both are great for video, X-T3 is better in low light, but GH5 has stabilization and better handling, so it depends on your preferences.
@@TheHybridShooter Would it be worth giving up my GH5 for the low light, the AF, and the Cinema 4K@60?
Thank you for making this video
You're welcome!
what is your favorite wildlife camera/lens combo?
Probably the G9 with Panasonic Leica 50-200 F2.8-4 and teleconvertors.
@@TheHybridShooter do you agree 100-400 is not sharp at 400mm? I have a hard time focusing. Soft or out of focus
Very useful content.
Thank you.
What are your custom settings for picture profile for the G9 and the G85? Looked through a bunch of videos, but can't seem find it other than the year old video. Wondering if your picture profile preferences have changed. Your videos are the best hands down on these cameras. Thank you
Thank you, for out of camera shots it is standard picture style, for video I use Cinelike D with no changes on the G9 if I don't intend to do much color grading, and natural on G85 / GX9.
According to the spec sheet the G9 EVF magnification is 0.83.
Any reviews or comparisons on the xt4 coming ?
Probably not, I didn't get a review unit.
The Hybrid Shooter ahh shame ok .
Do you think now with ibis ,flippy screen and larger battery this is ideal ?
I’m stuck between this gh5 and the new canon r6 to release .
I personally don't like flippy screens at all, so that is a downgrade for me, but the IBIS will be great addition. Sony will also have a big announcement next month.
When it comes down to size, cost and features. Mostly for photos and traveling with some videos. What would be your suggestion. Anyone can chime in and give me your thoughts.
Thanks
Both are very suitable for that, G9 has IBIS which is very useful, but the X-T3 is also OK with OIS lens, so it depends on your preferences.
Hello Hybrid Shooter! Thanks for the detailed review and comparison.
I own a G85 with Olympus 12-40 and I am searching for an upgrade, especially when it comes to AF and video capabilities. I find it difficult to decide between the Panasonic G9 and the Fuji X-H1 . I primarily do 60/40 Video and I ignore the XT3 due to lack of IBIS which is very important for me. Considering price factors (G9 is 1750 with Leica 12-60 and Fuji XH1 is 2000 with 16-55), what would you recommend for video work with average color grading, real estate photography, landscapes and street.
Thank you!
I would probably recommend the GH5 for video. The AF on GH5 with 2.4 is much better than on G85.
This man is a machine!!