The Queen's Harsh Words for Prince Charles | The Crown (Olivia Colman, Josh O'Connor)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ย. 2024
- Elizabeth (Olivia Colman) reveals to Charles (Josh O'Connor) that she knows he didn't read the speech given to him, Charles' rebelliousness bothers the Queen who says harsh words to her firstborn.
From Season 3, Episode 6: Tywysog Cymru
Stream The Crown on Netflix! www.netflix.co...
The Crown is based on Queen Elizabeth II as a young newlywed faced with leading the world's most famous monarchy while forging a relationship with legendary Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill. The British Empire is in decline, and the political world is in disarray, but a new era is dawning. Peter Morgan's masterfully researched scripts reveal the Queen's private journey behind the public façade with daring frankness. Prepare to see into the coveted world of power and privilege behind the locked doors of Westminster and Buckingham Palace.
#TheCrown #TheCrownSeason3 #QueenElizabeth #OliviaColman #TVShow
Olivia Colman and the writers did such a fantastic job depicting the queen's different relationships with her children.
Colman didn’t do it for me as the Queen.
I can't get over how well chosen these actors are. They truly look and act the part.
Churchill was a disaster
Charles was nowhere near as attractive as Josh O’Connor is
He couldnt control diana and he was full.of jealousy that the kingdom loved and wanted diana and did not care about him.
The way he says "predicament" scratches an itch in my brain
Pre,dicament
The most cruel scene of the entire show. And the most incredible thing is that later on in life, Charles crashed Diana's personality because she was shadowing his character, a cry-baby, the Queen knew that
They both wanted to be mothered. She never had a present mother and he had a very distant emotionally unavailable one. They were both painfully immature and needy. He was looking for a mother which he found in Camilla, she was looking for a supportive, loving and protective man, which she never found. Charles hated her and put her down because he was envious of her success, she was the star of the show, not him, and he loathed her for that. At the same time she enjoyed it a little bit too much and went out of her way to eclipse the royals.
Nobody wants to hear it. Speaks volumes
I think deep down Charles is a real complicated but compassionate man; but was bottled down by his standing.
@@jakecrawford1438as was the last Prince of Wales 1901-10 when his mother Queen Victoria belittled every moment cos of Albert’s death she blamed HIM FOR
DIANA DID THE TV interview FULL ON as did HARRY YEARS LATER COS THE ROYALS don’t wanna know !!!
@@Dowager666 And neither do the rest of us.
What an actress she is
One of the best
She is awesome
The price he paid for living his entire life in absolute luxury with people waiting on him day and night. If he wanted his voice heard, he could have walked away from it all, and maybe someone would have listened. But he chose the luxurious existence. Nobody held a gun to his head.
That would've been very hard to do, given the precedent of his uncle. He'd have not only lost luxury, but his whole family, only to be thrown out into a world in which he had no skills to survive. Hasn't worked out so well for Harry, and he has a wife with Hollywood connections.
You are correct. He could have " walked away".
@@jackuzi8252 How hasn't it worked out for Harry? It seems like Harry and Megan are doing quite well for themselves.
@@InTheMourning421 Well, he's living on another continent from where he was born and raised, and apparently none of his family talk to him. I'm not sure they're doing "quite well" but they get by because, as I wrote, his wife has Hollywood connections.
@@InTheMourning421 he's an outcast, his family officially cut ties with him and Megan. He is living just like his great-uncle did after his abdication to the crown, even worse because Edward was at least on same continent but Harry lives on the other side of the world
I actually felt I could relate to Charles in season 3. Then season 4 happened, then season 5. I have yet to watch season 6, but if the point of this scene is to flesh out duty's links to intergenerational trauma, then job well done.
Charles is awful but the way he says 'Mummy.. i have a voice' is so sad... it's like he become a small little boy all over again....
what a sweet lady .... warmth and caring all over
Thats DRIPPING with sarcasm. Imagine never being shown love by your own mother.
In fairness, Prince Charles' "I have a beating heart" at 3:11 was particularly harsh. But the Queen hadn't the luxury of really losing her temper, so she goes to "nobody wants to hear it."
She's tough, but I get that. I'm the son of a Marine & the grandson of a three-war veteran. I know toughness. I respect it. Say what you like about her, but she stuck by her principles. You always knew exactly where you stood with her. If England's going to keep a monarchy in the 21st century, people like her have to run it, or it won't work. King Charles has big shoes to fill, and now that he's finally gotten the throne, he's gotten sick. Not at all surprising. How many people have to start a new job they've been waiting for all their lives at 73? Most people have long since retired by that age.
I hope Princess Catherine is in good health. If King Charles gets too sick to stay king, Prince William's going to need her at her best.
Charles is an adult in this scene. The reality of his position is he is not allowed to have an opinion. She is making him face reality.
Mummy
😂😂😂
Moral of story of this segment: Keep a damn poker face will ya!
Perhaps the Queen was mad because she KNOWS Charles was often ignored by her. To always excuse any mistake blaming “duty” very convenient.
Do we know that this conversation ever took place - given that The Crown has been described as fiction based on some facts - meaning that some of these events never happened. Who would have known about this conversation?
So many seasons building up Charles as a sympathetic person, so many. And then he has to go and demand an inkwell to be moved 🤦
I mean, his mother had JUST died...he's allowed to be a bit snippy.
This scene to me empathizes what many in America thinks.....the Royal Family is basically the world richest welfare household. The Queen know this. She understands the popularity of the Royals is only as strong as the people allow it to be. To choose a side that will bring disfavor to the masses will eventually break that delicate balance and the need of the monarchy will be no more. I believe Britain is starting to experience that now (2024) with all the protests and marches on the street. The actual topic is not important, who is allowing that topic to exist is.
I think one of the best lines about the Royal Family actually came from a comedy, King Ralph. Peter O'Toole's character stated (paraphrasing) "A king is not allowed to solve problem, unfortunately it does not stop him from causing them."
Diderot said "People will only be free when the last king is strangled with he entrails of the last priest" the culture wars are merely a distraction from the class war, which is the real issue.
I cannot stand that Camilla and Charles.
Growing up in a family of Irish Catholics, I had nothing but resent for the royals, whilst simultaneously knowing absolutely zero about them. This show, while sometimes embellishing the facts for the sake of entertainment and drama, has provided me with a new viewpoint I hadn't considered before. One of sympathy and compassion for people denied the right to be people.
Oh please. They could end this whole pathetic farce tomorrow if they wanted to. "Royal family as victims" makes a good TV show but that's all. Certain members of the royal family (eg Diana) as victims of other members, yes -- but that's family dynamics.
@@remycallie Have you accepted that this is drama - not historical fact?
@@Rosemary-vf5ei Yes, that's exactly what I just said. This is the "royal family as victims" TV show. It garners sympathy for the "poor" royals but has no basis in reality.
Given that the monarch is supposed to be impartial; HMTQ was not wrong. It wasn't the message, it was the way it was delivered
that cut Charles to the core. But Charles gave back as good as he got by insinuating that his mother was cold and unfeeling! That
must have hurt the Queen. Somehow, I think that Charles might have had more success discussing his Wales trip with his grandmother.
Charles isn’t the monarch though she’s talking about as if the whole family shouldn’t have a voice or opinion or exist what she is talking about was said from queen mary is just the monarch that doesn’t apply to her son princess Margaret didn’t do as her sister said she had a voice and used it so did princess Anne I’m sorry the queen is wrong
@@zakhenson9809 You're not wrong. However, it can be a difficult thing to consider the life experience of Elizabeth that led her to this point in the first place. "The crown must win...must always win." I can see no further proof than this of how she took that piece of advice to heart. And then I think back to what her father said to Phillip, her fiance. His job is to love her. And I think this scene in particular reveals to us at least some of what loving her entailed. In the specific context of this television program anyway.
She's actually right in this matter: No modern politician, not even Charles' later "heartfelt friend" Tony Blair, would be grateful if a crown prince, king or queen openly interfered in day-to-day politics. But I don't think King George ever treated his daughter with such icy contempt as she does here with her son and crown prince - if this conversation is anything like the facts, Elizabeth must have had other role models. By the way, Charles' "mission" was quite successful: the "emotional" Welsh agreed with their prince to such an extent that plans for rebellion and secession were off the table for the time being, and at some point Wales was given self-government rights just like the Scottish part of the country.
Sometimes you have to tell a grown child their expectations are no longer appropriate.
Possibly King George was able to treat his daughter with respect and not contempt because she was intelligent and able to take on the role. Charles however is like his father - none too bright, and given to put his foot in his mouth.
As a US citizen, this present day expectation of the monarchy has always struck me as odd. I understand it to some degree, in that you don’t want a hereditary political player, but as too often politics interweave with basic right versus wrong views, it does seem odd you don’t want the monarchy to stand for what is right. Though not a fan of Charles, in this one instance, I tend to agree with him. He was exercising active listening and repeating back what he was hearing from the people of Wales. And per your own comment, they FELT heard, and that made all the difference to them. I think I do understand the difficulty of walking that line.
It's difficult to deny that a certain ability to respond lessened in her over the years. To the point where it mostly died. At least, that is what's shown here. Where once was a place of passion is now a place of emptiness. As that is part of the job. But the job can only ever be so large...right?? There is a world outside of that job too. And it's just as real as any other world.
@@callmeswivelhips8229 You mean she got set in her ways as she got old, as most people do when they get old?
I wonder who were Elizabeth's role models, because, and according to this show, King George was never icy or emotionally distant with his daughters, quite the contrary, he adored them and was a loving father.
Charles was a father for ten years before becoming King. Elizabeth became queen much younger, and was being prepped for the role even earlier, being the direct heir, while her father was expected to fall down the line of succession once David settled down and had babies. But Anne has actually said her parents were very loving behind closed doors. They were just often away
@@MsJubjubbird You are ignorant... William was born 42 years ago. 42>10 ten. Moron.
Her mother of course. The Queen Mother was extremely mean and selfish.
@@MsJubjubbird
"Charles was a father for 10 years before becoming king"
Ha?
You do realize both boys were in their late 30s/early 40s when Charles, their father, became King.
What are you even talking about???
@@Ariana-wv4pf probably a typo
Did she ever consider Queen Mary came from an antiquated time, where emotional constipation and coldness were normalized by the upper class? She took her literally, without question. Here lies within the grave mistake of not using your own judgements and common sense rather than following a script only because thats how its always been done.
The last line - cold hearted.
How any man could choose camilla over Diana i will never never understand.
Not everyone is after aesthetic beauty. Charles has never been the kind of guy to have arm candy or chase models or anything. This is a university educated intellectual who likes gardening, environmental heritage and historical buildings. Diana hadn't finished high school, wanted to go to parties and be a socialite. There was very little in common. Camilla studied at the university of London and liked living in the country with dogs and horses and painting landscapes.
Good point , didn't consider that factor.
not true he went after flossy blondes@@MsJubjubbird
No one ever does. All they see is Dianas looks. They don't look at the personalities of Charles, Diana and Camilla@user-iw9yo9ul3o
@@Kimllg88 not really no. He was not a playboy prince. If they were blonde it was just a coincidence
It is ironic to think - when Olivia Colman is made a dame (and it has to happen at some point) it will be Charles who gives it to her.
Awkward!!! :P
Well, it could be William if Charles hasn’t inherited his mother’s and the Queen Mother’s near immortality
As a human charles is right he also wanted to take support from outsiders and common people (when diana gave interview to seek help from public the whole family made her feel all alone and ignored her like she never wxist alive worst behaviour of queen and her family towards diana ) . But as a queen, lilibet is correctly following rules books and wants her son to do so as he is future heir . Both are correct in their own views .
I support charles here because he is not wholly by british rule book but also a human with heart ❤❤but the tough system changed him 😢😢😢😢
Many monarchies got abolished in the history simply bcz the ruler followed his heart.
@@fahimfaisalmahir567 u r right ruler must follow gods principles. the british queen elizabeth ii and family are Christian people's. If they followed whatever principles given by god then things might have been different .
Charles only had a wife to get an heir and a spare for the throne. Poor Dianna, they tried to make out she was crazy and she was with love for Charles, she was used abused and gaslighted by a narcissistic Charles,I find him disgusting, a liar and cheat, he should never have been king a and Camilla should never have been queen. Any wonder people are turning away from the Monarchy, they lost my support many years ago.
They take the abdication really seriously, I do think the "you have to be impartial" is based on the Duke of Windsor who followed his own heart to marry Wallis Simpson who bring a lot of troubles to the Monarchy.
They make sure that would never happen anymore.
@@loganmcallen9067WRONG. 3 of ER's children plus her sister divorced. And Phillip simply moved out.
A family where children have to make an official appointment via palace offices and personal secretaries and seek audience to speak for 10 minutes to their own mother or father and, when they manage to secure that appointment, they're talked to as Charles is in this scene (and I don't think reality was much different) is not a functional family. In a modern world, it's actually a recipe for disaster. This sort of formality and coldness may have been suited to the stiff-upper-lip times, when such an attitude was not unheard of even in normal families, but in this day and age that's simply stupid and is asking for troubles, troubles which eventually hit the Queen. That advice that she took and followed word for word from her grandmother turned out to be very poor because it almost destroyed her family in an era of emotional liberation which her grandmother could not possibly foresee, let alone understand.
Don’t give hysteria some sort of fancy name called ‘emotional liberty’. Showing emotions in public is vulnerability. Queen Mary was 100% right. People will mostly use that against you rather than showing support. Queen could survive so long with huge public support bcz she never let public know her true emotions whereas all other members of the family failed to do so and they got fried by people.
So true!
Allow me to play the world’s smallest violin. When you have dozens of palaces, hundreds of people at your service, red carpet everywhere you go, millions of the tax payers’ money, a life of unimaginable confort and luxury, so what if you are asked to give up some things? Opinions? Privacy? Anonymity? I don’t feel bad for any of them. Not for Charles not for William not for Harry of their wives and kids. People can’t afford food or heating in the dead of winter. Formality is a small price to pay for all their privileges.
@@sakaya9878OH SHUSH it ‘ ENGERY crisis 😂🤣😂🤣😂 NONONE wants to hear you
@@sakaya9878let me play the SMALLEST of 🎻 THE ROYALS are NOT CHOSEN by you OR ANY GOVERNMENT they are chosen BY GOD to lead they are CROWNED IN HIS CHURCH NOT A OFFICE BLOCK you’re jealous you haven’t got what they have and it shows !! Probably in a council Estate somewhere moaning and being nasty cos of your “opinion “ which actually is A STATEMENT OF your bitterness and resentment frankly !!! Yes they have a privilege life it’s NOT ONE for everyone there is a PECKING PRIVILEGE ORDER which btw you couldn’t hack !
Such cold hearts in this family! They don’t care about nothing or no one , but their image! So sad
It’s called PROTOCOL!! And rank that’s why
There’s a reason why I say The Royals are more objectified than strippers on a pole.
@@Dowager666 Protocol doesn't force them to act distant and cold with each other. That's a choice Elizabeth made, and her son's insecurity is the consequence of that choice.
THEY ARE DUTY BOUND AND SEE EVERYTHING THROUGH THAT PARTICULAR LENS. THEY ARE RAISED TO KEEP THEIR EMOTIONS UNDER CONTROL IN PUBLIC AND IN THIS AGE OF TELL ALL BOOKS, BLUBBERY TRUE CONFESSIONS, INTERVIEWS WITH OPRAH WHERE THEY WHINE INCESSANTLY I FIND THEIR DIGNITY ADMIRABLE.
It’s so they don’t get booted out
Keep it coming with the crown videos please. My favorite show on Netflix.
❤ Absolutely!!!
Sadly when the Princess of Wales chooses to stay silent whilst recovering from surgery, people fill the silence with nonsense.
But why release a fake photo and lie about it?
@@dosman3458 she didn't lie about it. If she wanted to lie she would have done a better job!
I don't understand why some people have got so upset. And it's gone way too far. One major news broadcaster published the meta data of the image, saying the exact time it was edited, the camera used, the shutter speed of the image etc. That's creepy af. No wonder they don't share much, that's near stalker levels of obsession under the guise of 'news'. Diana was trailed by paps till it killed her. Kate has to negotiate every random on the street having a camera and the ability to upload images to the internet immediately. No wonder she disappeared.
@@dosman3458 It's not a fake photo it's a photoshopped photo which 99% of public photographs are anyway lol
@@frname7665It’s fake, a composite. Why do you think they aren’t releasing the unedited original? It’s because it doesn’t exist and the idea that’s it’s ok for a member of the royal family to disseminate misinformation is fake the birds. Why should we believe anything she says or does from now on now that she has been shown to have zero integrity?
so fake...@@frname7665
The Queen and Charles are very temperamentally different. In personality he’s a lot more like his father, The Queen was a lot more like her father…stoic, reserved and concerned with duty rather than personal fulfilment.
Charles is without doubt more of a people person than his more aloof mother.
But as cold as it sounds she’s right, it’s cruel in a way but the Monarch does have no right to express a view…their function is constitutional and for them to express a belief undermines Democracy because they are in their position by birth rather than popular decree
Charles isn’t the monarch though she’s talking about as if the whole family shouldn’t have a voice or opinion or exist what she is talking about was said from queen mary is just the monarch that doesn’t apply to her son princess Margaret didn’t do as her sister said she had a voice and used it so did princess Anne I’m sorry the queen is wrong
@@zakhenson9809 but he’s going to be the monarch. That’s the point, you spend your whole life telling people what you think before you take the throne. Even if you remain impartial on the throne (which he has)…you’ve undermined the system.
And it is the whole family, you couldn’t have The Duke of Edinburgh publicly taking a view on Scottish independence for example
Princess Anne the queen mother and Margaret have spoken out and done as they like partying drinking etc and it didn’t bathe the queen even princess Anne told a reporter to naff off im sorry those rules may apply to Charles because he will be king but not her sister daughter or mother after all rules are made to be broken
@@zakhenson9809 do you know what any of these people’s opinions are on political issues or constitutional matters?
I also love how she’s referring to the royal family hiding feelings being impartial when queen mary said just the monarch prince Edward vii who divorced wasn’t impartial or silent and he was like that as a prince long before he was king
What Charles is missing is that, in a Constitutional monarchy, the hereditary nature of his position precludes his having an opinion. The minute he takes a side, then he is entering politics. The obvious response to that is, why should your opinion matter more than anyone else?
You want an opinion, resign your princely position and run for office. Otherwise, keep your mouth shut and enjoy the perks of royalty.
If I'm not mistaken the thinking too is that once one member of the monarchy takes a side it's assumed the whole monarchy feels the same. Since they're not allowed to be individuals and all.
Poor Charles.
…….she is right STILL!
Sorely missed. XXXXX American here but sobbed my heart out the day she passed. from Portugal
"in a box, a box"
i agree with Charles here 200%
Not a whiner, cursed by a sister and son who do little else.
Charles really thinks the monarchy would survive getting involved in politics.
He will be proven WRONG big time. His Darling Boy is going to bring down the monarchy
Read for filth with a few words, "no one wants to hear it".😳
One of the greatest scenes!
Yes. But did it ever happen or, like most of The Crown, was it more fiction?
They present Charles as a pompous twit. Probably accurate.
He should not be king.
Did you know that Charles is technically the landlord of 80% of the world’s privately owned land? Maybe he should just STFU.
Not how hereditary monarchy works, lol.@@jws1948ja
@@jws1948ja would Anne have been better? Probably. He’s doing a fine job though. Far more warm and accessible that his mother was.
He's been into politics forever but the ignorant chattel and sheep don't educate themselves about it and assume things they don't know anything about. King Charles is the world's biggest globalist and most powerful man in the world now.
I admire the Queen, but I think she was totally wrong in this instance. Saying 'thank you' and 'well done' isn't expensive or time consuming and it goes a long way to good family relations.
Diana was a princess through marriage
Love the clumsy writing, "when your great-grandmother Queen Mary", as if Charles had no idea who she meant.
Olivia Coleman is a fine actress but I hated her portrayal of Queen Elizabeth 2nd. She played the Queen according to a script of course but it was cold, hard, frustrated, hurt, tearful, suppressed, confused, unsure, joyless and cruel. I am sure the Queen was none of those things even though she led such an unnatural life. Her duty ruled everything but I’m sure, did a lot to destroy her human nature and natural instincts. God bless her., what a sacrifice.
I do wonder at this myself. This portrayal seems fanciful at times.
damn, she definitely took some life out of him with that one
Prince Charles is just a spoiled & ungrateful brat. I never liked him.
Neither did his mother. That's the problem. Only people who were completely neglected and unloved by their parents know what his life was like.
if even a tenth of this relationship is true, Elizabeth is hands down, the worst mother. her spite and guilt dominate every interaction she has with charles
He wasn’t her favorite. That was Prince Andrew. Even though he embarrassed the monarchy.
@@rykenshaving a favourite child so obviously is disgusting and damaging
No wonder Charles was/is so messed up
I agree. She was the consulate a hole
@@Rat_Queen86 You can have a "favorite" (a kid that you generally get along with better), and still not treat your kids differently. I'm not saying it's a good thing to have favorites, but some people's personalities just mesh better.
The problem with Elizabeth and Charles is that it's more than not being her favorite; she actively pushes him down and dismisses everything that makes him who he is. As far as this show is concerned, Elizabeth has no real interest actually knowing who her son is, and then she's surprised when he behaves in ways she disapproves of. Ways that could have been avoided if she had bothered to connect with him and try and learn about who he is/what he wants.
Who are you actually kidding? Charles was a selfish, whinging, narcissistic, vindictive and vicious man most of his life. "Who he was" was repulsive to the core. His tyrannical terrorizing of Diana for years proved that. Sickens me that he is now king, thank all the gods that won't last long.
She was fuming because he said she had no character and was only good for cutting ribbons, after all she has been through to that point he gave her no credit.
Considering he made a speech which could have scandalised and weakened the monarchy; she went quite lightly on him.
The part of the speech that HM complained about was not in the speech. Charles read it as written. There was no secret message to the Welsh, it was fictionalized like most of "The Crown."
@@kevinmorgan8534it’s all fiction I’m responding to a scene, that’s all.
I like these two actors very much, but am relieved I have never watched an episode, and don't intend to - I cant imagine for one minute that they ever had a conversation like this one, no one knows exactly what they have discussed in private. It's wrong to have a drama that many people believe is factual, and because many of the characters it is about are alive today.
Ironic how Diana said all those things to Charles.
Wow, we now know who harry takes after
She contradicted herself
Charles is absolutely right. It is poignant irony that Charles realizes he is perhaps too human to be king. The people watching this as some kind of a gotcha for Diana are missing the point.
The Queen gets all GOT on poor Charles.
She was the queen
Such a whiney man... always complaining. She is cold, but she has to be. In a world where countless monarchies have been removed (violently), those remaining are left alone with the understanding that they are impartial. So no, the country does not care what you think, you just have to perform. No, the family does not want to hear you complaining about the things they cannot change if they want to remain in their privileged positions..... Also the parallel with the scene after Diana succesfuly completes her tour. He acted just like his mother here, even worse considering him being mad about his mistress feeling bad.
Sorry I love how Josh shows what a weak girl Charles is. Charles wants the attention Diana got but will never get it. Camilla is the same. People want William and Catherine than Charles and Camilla.
"she's in a box , in a box . in a box"
What did do wrong? I don't understand why she is mad at him.
His speech was too personal.
If the Queen was really like this then she must have been a terrible mother! 😒.
Of course she wasn't "really" like this -- or, at least, we'll never know. This series was written with high drama in mind, and -- very likely -- the Crown preferred to engender the least amount of drama possible in situations with her own family and, indeed, with the nation itself.
It would have probably been more along the lines but far less aggression
Charles isn’t the monarch though she’s talking about as if the whole family shouldn’t have a voice or opinion or exist what she is talking about was said from queen mary is just the monarch that doesn’t apply to her son princess Margaret didn’t do as her sister said she had a voice and used it so did princess Anne I’m sorry the queen is wrong
From what I read she was pretty hard core but in her defense she realized that most of her family were pretty much spoiled by priviledge which she mentioned quite often. Also I dont think she ever got over having to take the throne because she wasnt supposed to.
@@ronaldjackson2290 Princess Anne the queen mother and Margaret have spoken out and done as they like partying drinking etc and it didn’t bathe the queen even princess Anne told a reporter to naff off im sorry those rules may apply to Charles because he will be king but not her sister daughter or mother after all rules are made to be broken
She’s a cold hearted woman 💪🏽💪🏽🥷🏿
dignified and stoic...
I don't think she was it was just the way she was brought up.
Charles is such a putz...
¡Hola, buenas tardes!
How much is reality and how much is made up know one will ever know
She was doing her job, Charles was/is not a good man and/or person. In my opinion
That's a hell of an assessment of a person you've never met.
You just say it because everybody hates him, and you don't even know him.
Charles is a good person. The Dianas of this world, with all their issues, are impossible to live with for long
His own father didn’t have any confidence in him.
I found Germans to be very kind. Why wouldn't it be better to be under a German thumb than an English one?
Seriously?
Savage
She has ice water running through her veins!
Well she was very misogynistic like her husband who cheated on her repeatedly.
Perhaps she was a narcissist? All misogynists are regardless of whether they're male or female.
@@Cherrylipgloss2025how was she misogynistic?
She was a cold person.
She had to be. That’s what made her so successful in her reign. She followed the rules.
That was her job
No, I think she had feelings but was not so much raised as she was trained to be the sovereign. And keeping her emotions under control was part of the deal. She was stoic and dignified and in a world where people tend to spill their guts out and reveal far too much, she maintained a quiet dignity. It took a lot of strength not to speak her mind. Hers was a life of duty first, self second. Altogether admirable and very rare.
Multi Billionaires and their unique problems.
Oh I'm sure your issues should take center stage then?
If this conversation truly happened, this may be why King Charles isn't doing anything about the H & M debacle.
I’m not sure what he is supposed to do?
I don’t want to say that Olivia Colman is miscast in this, but she played the private QEII all wrong. She erased all traces of QEII’s gentleness that Claire Foy gave her. The only time we heard Claire speak in this angry tone was when she was arguing with Philip about “being lost” and it was a release of years of pented-up rage over his affairs. No way do I believe she would ever speak to Charles like this; this personality doesn’t jibe with Seasons 1&2.
You’re forgetting that times changed by the time we got to Olivia Coleman‘s Queen Elizabeth. People change, we all do. By the time of the 1960s, the world was much different and she had seen so much
@@stevencramsie9172 I agree that people change and the very nature of her demanding role, having to put on that public face day after day no doubt toughened her up. But Colman played her too tough, IMO.
@@pam0626 I agree. I like Olivia Coleman but in her portrayal there's not much of the warmth the Queen could show. Despite her many talents Olivia is my least favorite in this role.
@@cherylhulting1301 Colman’s QEII was more intimidating than Thatcher.
But then gets mad at Diana for doing something and being a symbol
Just a reminder folks. This is fiction with real peoples names.
No one wants to hear it what a totally messed up world they live in it’s anything but normal
I wonder if the Queen really said " to not " instead of " Not to "
Horrible Mohter
Rather too much of a voice for my liking 😂😂😂
She was so very wrong.
One scene that made me hate Elizabeth II. Cold uncaring mother. I don't care what anyone thinks, I'll always see Diana and Harry as the best of the best.
Diana and Harry 😂😂😂
Zero respect for Harry...
@@micheleM-wn8qfTotal Respect for Harry. .....
@@micheleM-wn8qfI have. Just because he got away from this vile family!
Charles isn’t the monarch though she’s talking about as if the whole family shouldn’t have a voice or opinion or exist what she is talking about was said from queen mary is just the monarch that doesn’t apply to her son princess Margaret didn’t do as her sister said she had a voice and used it so did princess Anne I’m sorry the queen is wrong
While the monarch has a unique status, other members of the royal family indeed have their own roles, responsibilities, and, to a degree, platforms to voice opinions. However, there are traditional expectations around the “royal protocol,” which generally encourage members of the royal family to refrain from public expressions of personal opinion on political matters to maintain a neutral stance on politics.
While Margarete had a voice and used it, her actions often stirred controversy within the context of royal expectations. Charles as the sovereign „in-waiting“ certainly has to adhere to royal protocol more than every other member of the family. And lastly, the Queen was never wrong 😉
Thankyou but you forgot princess Anne who I mentioned the queen mother was also opinionated as was queen mary the queen dowager when her husband king George v died queen Elizabeth’s grandfather as dud prince Edward and also prince Phillip I studied history not from watching the crown
@@zakhenson9809 That‘s quite impressive indeed. Could you quote some of Princess Anne‘s political statements, just so I can learn from your studies? Maybe not the subtle once that could be interpreted as political statements- like when she refused to shakes US president Donald Trump‘s hand. I missed those clear political statements she made, my bad. Could you help me out?
She told reporters to naff off a man tried to kidnap her in her carriage and she said not bloody likely i never said I can quote from politics I said she was outspoken I wish you wouldn’t take things out of context
She looked bored on royal tours as well and hated the idea of cameras being in Buckingham palace and when she’s with her brothers you can tell what she says goes and she said she never liked jewellery or puffy dresses like princess Margaret queen mother or her mother queen Elizabeth ii she likes staying out of the limelight doing her work and not getting much coverage from the press and says she wants to keep it that way
If all this is true , we shouldn't blame Harry
Oh do shut up Charles! We like to think this is drama based on real people but now we're stuck with a real life version of this spoiled self-obsessed pampered whiny prince--Harry. The queen is right, NO ONE CARES. So maybe I should have said, Oh do shut up harry!
I was once proud of my UEL heritage and admired and respected our late Queen. However, I despise King Charles for his activism, his self-centeredness and his support for the WEF agenda. I now believe that Canada should cut its ties to a foreign monarchy.
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
Mummy!
She had facelift 4:29
Ok, well?!!
This particular encounter is very hard to believe. Queen Elizabeth had a beauty regimen? I think not.😅
Evil Queen From Snow And The Seven Dwarfs The Movie