ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- Only adults would suck the magic out of "Harry Potter" like this. For this list, we’ll be looking at all those ideas that went right over your head when you were a young buck reading or watching “Harry Potter.” Our countdown includes Hufflepuff, love potions, Dumbledore kind of sucks, and more! Let us know if we missed any of YOUR most surprising aha moments in the comments below!
Watch more great "Harry Potter" videos here:
Every Harry Potter Movie, Ranked from Worst to Best - • Every Harry Potter Mov...
Top 10 Harry Potter Plot Twists - • Top 10 Harry Potter Pl...
Top 10 Harry Potter Fan Theories We Want to Be True - • Top 10 Harry Potter Fa...
Challenge friends and family on our multiplayer Trivia!
www.watchmojo....
Have Your Idea Become A Video!
wmojo.com/msmo...
Subscribe for more great content!
wmojo.com/msmo...
MsMojo is a leading producer of reference online video content of Top 10 Lists, Origins, Biographies, Commentary and more on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes. Your trusted authority on ranking Pop Culture.
#HarryPotter #WizardingWorld #AdultsOnly #Hogwarts #Dumbledore
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
Did you notice any of these things when you watched HP as a kid? Let us know below, and be sure to also check out our video of the Every Harry Potter Movie, Ranked from Worst to Best - th-cam.com/video/34vLiBDdQoY/w-d-xo.html
Top 10 Things Only Adults Notice in My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic!
best movie ever
I was 15 years old when the first Harry Potter movie came out
You whine like WOKE GIRL
These are the MOVIES. Very different from the books. People continously assume that what happened in the movies happened in the books. IT DIDN'T. Dumbledore only ever suspected Harry was horcrux, it wasn't until almost the end of Half-Blood Prince that he knew for sure. As for the house-elves, it was a great way of depicting how slavery & racism is still viewed, to this day. It's fight that, unfortunately, many people do not support. It was also not even mentioned in the movies. In the books, however, many people; including Harry & Ron, do join that fight and the Elves are freed. Many chose to stay at Hogwarts as that was their home & they loved the students. As for the Time Turner, look closely at the hour glass. Does it look like it is the size of one that can be set to go back years & years ago? Seriously, the last words between Snape & Dumbledore. Dumbledore: "After all this time"? Snape: "Always". What exactly was Dumbledore supposed to tell Harry? Also, it wasn't Dumbledore's story to tell. Professor Moody was kidnapped by Barty Crouch junior & drank polyjuice potion. He looked, sounded, & acted like the Professor. Professor Quirrell was probably vetted before Voldemort got a hold of him, & Prof. Lovejoy was a great liar & excellent at charms. Obviously, through the vetting process they spoke to people in his life that he used his amnesia charm on in order for his lies to pass for truth. Also, as for the other things, yes questionable. Yes, the Dementors punishment is horrific, as is stated, this is the Wizarding World. Things are done differently, mostly because of the first Wizard War & trying to prevent another one. READ THE BOOKS, stop relying on the movies. Too much of what's important is left out of the movies.
As a proud Hufflepuff, I always hated that Hufflepuffs never got any proper time to shine in either the books or films. Their kindness and loyalty is truly underlooked compared to the other houses.
Well said
As much as I didn't care for the Fantastic Beasts movies, I did love how the lead character was a Hufflepuff.
Yes, well said. 😊
Damn right. Kindness isn’t a weakness
THEY HAVE! YOU ARE CLEARLY NOT A HUFFLEPUFF IF YOU DONT KNOW THAT!!
I think a huge part of the reason why Dumbledore never told Harry everything was BECAUSE he was a horcrux and Voldemort constantly had access to Harry's mind, so if Harry knew every little detail then Voldemort would as well. If Harry knew everything from the start, Voldemort would've likely won and taken over the world.
So blatantly obvious!
Dumbledore is a complex and flawed individual. Which is why he’s such an interesting and well written character.
Dumbledore is a very problematic character, as he let child endangerment occur often at his school, sent Harry to live with the Dursleys, and was grooming Harry to be killed by Voldemort.
@@maxxymrice6200 sure, you can believe he’s “problematic” but that wasn’t the point of my comment.
See, I can respect and acknowledge the truth of that statement. At the same time i get incredibly frustrated with the character because all the other characters treat him like he's infallible. And it never really stops. At the same time, so much could be avoided if he treated other people like they had agency and could make decisions on their own. I don't mind a complex and problematic. I mind that no one ever calls him on his s***
@@a.i.ridges6652 I mean I think he does get called out by the people who know him best, like Snape and Aberforth. But of course the people who look up to him, like Harry, are gonna see him as infallible. That strikes me as true to life. We look up to our mentors and our idols and we see them as flawless even when they’re clearly not.
@@alexlazzerly3677 i see your point about Snape and Aberforth calling him out. At the same time i always got the sense other characters viewed as wrong/bitter for doing that. And at the end, at least Snape, is shut down with essentially "trust the plan" and also "you're a worse person than me". And the plan works!
I agree a lot of the times we put mentors on pedestals. But inevitably we end up reconciling the idea our authority figures are imperfect and we have to make our own way and taken off the pedestal. I just never feel like Dumbledore gets taken off the pedestal. It's mostly just - yeah that wasn't great, but greater good and all that. Someone who isn't Snape (because he gets to be the moral figure on exactly 0 subjects) saying that an action was shitty and he should feel shitty about would feel better for me.
I'm an adult. Any adult who thinks that Dumbldore sucks is short-sighted and did not take in the books properly.
I'm not going to go into a rant but if you're an adult and you believe that "Dumbldore sucks" then you're obviously in need of some more years in the oven. Only a child could read those books and come to such a basic conclusion.
Albus is a complex character. He is arguably the most complex character in the entire book series and only an adult with a sharp and properly enlightened mind will be able to read in between the lines and take in all his complexities to be able to appreciate the character properly.
You'll know when you've done that cuz you'll start to realise that you feel more sad for Dumbldore that you feel angry at him.
Everyone forgets too that voldemort can literally read Harry's mind. He can't be told anything because he sucks at oclumency.
Still, no valid reason to never help Harry a little more as a kid. Mrs. Figg was surely reporting things to Dumbledore that should have been adressed. She actually says she couldn't make her occasional babysitting fun so Mrs. Dudley would continue to call her.
Harry could have had a proper bed, proper clothes, proper food, reasonable chores. And still grow up a nice kid.
@@mffmoniz2948 People seem to conveniently forget that Dumbldore is human too. He had the whole plan on his shoulders. The plan that the faith of the Wizarding world rested on. He alone was carrying that heavy burden while running a school filled with children and trying to keep the ministry at bay. They were facing the darkest wizard in the entire wizardom, the plan needed to go as perfectly as it possibly could. There weren't a lot of things that could be interfered with.
Now, not only did he have to come up with this plan, alone and with the ministry breathing down his neck, he couldn't even share it with anyone. He was alone.
In the end, that plan is what saved the Wizarding world.
Dumbldore was undeniably a good person though, he cared about people. I mean he even refused to let Draco murder him so as not to "taint his soul", so he had Snape do it instead. He did good where he could, helped Hagrid and Lupin, offered to pay Dobby for work, let Sybil stay in the castle, and so much more.
I know Dumbldore comes off as this invincible God, who can do anything, so it's easy to blame him for every wrong in the story, but in the end, he's still just a brilliant but flawed, lonely old man with a heavy burden to bare on his aging back. Didn't you notice that in that Kingscross scene/chapter, he seems so much lighter, because he had finally played his part, and he was free. Don't you see, he HAD to play God, because someone had to. Someone had to shoulder that heavy,..... lonely burden. Someone had to know every part of the plan and all the pieces and variables involved in the plan but still be disciplined enough not to go moving the pieces around when things were sad or wrong or when something wasn't suiting their conscious. Like I said, very heavy burden to bare, and not a lot of people could have executed it to near perfection the way he did. It's actually very sad and that great man deserves to be cut some slack.
So yeah.... it's a lot more complicated than just simply saying "Dumbldore sucks".
In the book's all of the time turners destroyed during the battle at the ministry of magic which is why real Harry Potter fans don't count the cursed child as Canon
I am being honest Love potions being sold for commercial use seems pretty dangerous. The fact Voldemort was created because of love potions should have been reason enough to ban it's use
Well to be fair no one knew what happened if a bady was made while a love potion was active but still I argee not a good idea
It def bothered me hufflepuff never got the attention and exposure the other houses got.
The house elves dilemma is complicated; they're based on mythical creatures like boggarts (not the ones you know in HP) and broonies, basically small creatures that helped with household chores and some of them would be insulted if you tried to pay them for their work that they'd leave. This is what Rowling was portraying with the house elves, esp in the Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix books where the elves take great insult to Hermione's attempts to convince them to ask for wages and clothes that they kick the trio out of the kitchen and stop cleaning the Gryffindor common room. You might think it's a bit much on their end, but considering the creatures they're inspired by, its accurately portrayed.
Though I love Hermione, MsMojo is wrong, she isn't perfect. While Hermione *did* have good intentions, she was also misinformed by having Dobby be the first house elf she heard about. She saw and heard him being happy about his freedom and looking for paid work and thought that's exactly what all the house elves should work for too, but Hagrid himself said that there's always the one outlier (can't remember his exact words), and Fred and George told her that the house elves working in Hogwarts were happy. In fact the house elves in Hogwarts prob have it better than most house elves; you've seen how Dobby was treated by the Malfoys, and most house elves work for rich and pure-blood families expected to take care of the household by themselves, while the Hogwarts elves work with many others so the workload is divided.
It's also the only thing both sides know; house elves have always been helpful, looking to serve someone, while wizards prob (and let's face it most people would take advantage if they were real) were glad to accept their help. While it sucks that it isn't an equal partnership, and while Hermione could've started a change to this, she started too forcefully, wanting everyone to change things right away. What she didn't consider is that most students of course wouldn't be onboard cause they (unlike Hermione) have lived in the wizarding world their whole lives and to them this *is* just the norm; it'd be like if someone walked up to you saying 'i just finished my first botany class and realized flowers are actually vegetables. Please sign this petition if you also agree flowers should be sold in supermarkets and advertised as food.'
Plus, the only other house elf she knew and the first she actually met was Winky, a house elf who literally became an alcoholic cause she became so depressed cause she was freed from her master as a punishment. If Hermione had succeeded in freeing a bunch of house elves, they wouldn't exactly be jumping for joy, they'd become just as depressed or angry, esp since it's hard for a house elf to find a job when they've been freed, its the equivalent to being blacklisted in your field of work.
If I have a Wizard son/Witch daughter, I make sure a certain school is harmless. I’d be crushed and vengeful if my magical kid(s) gets killed in such a dangerous place.
Not to mention that when Myrtle was talking to Harry about putting the egg in the water, she said that it was what Cedric did, so she must have peeped on Cedric too, she even said all the bubbles were almost gone
Myrtle was 14 when she died, though, which was also Harry's age in that scene. Nothing inappropriate there. (Although, obviously, it is wrong that they picked a 40-year-old actress instead of a teen.)
@@sarammauricio a 14yr old girl spying on a naked boy is still wrong though? I mean I know she can't leave the toilet but still ...
@@renge5589 I only meant that it wasn't inappropriate age-wise. The characters were the same age, the huge gap only existed between the actors. I absolutely agree that, when it comes to respecting his privacy and boundaries, regardless of their age, it was very inappropriate.
@@sarammauricio right, sorry for misunderstanding then
We're not gonna talk about the lack of representation of Ravenclaw? The sorting hat didn't even say the house name.
Well there was Cho and Luna who were prominent characters.
Barty Crouch Jr was also a Ravenclaw.
But I get what you mean, there definitely should've been more.
@@LewisRJHope Barty Crouch Jr.? 🤨
@@stephenking5852
Yes, Barty Crouch Jr was a Ravenclaw, everyone knows that.
Not all death eaters were Slytherins
🙄
@@LewisRJHope well Dolores Umbridge and Narcissa Malfoy were Slyhtherins who sided with Voldemort, but they weren’t officially Death Eaters. 😝
@@stephenking5852
Yes, and? What exactly is the point you're making?
Peter Pettigrew was a Gryffindor and an official Death Eater.
Fun Fact: In the ending credits of Prisoner Of Azkaban, there’s a couple getting it on, on the Marauders Map.
One more thought. If dumbledore did reveal things earlier and the kids skipped a year to find the horcruxes and ended voldemort, I wonder who the new villain of the series be.
LOL. The Dursley’s treated Harry horrible. They treated him like a 3rd class citizen, he slept underneath the stairs in a closet, and they were verbally and physically abusive to him. Yet we’re supposed to feel bad because the book made them fat?
It is the implications of fat=evil. Their physical build wouldn't have had anything to do with their behaviour. They could have been portrayed as health nuts and nothing would have changed.
Its a complaint about using fat as a proxy for laziness and gluttony. Unfortunately as a byproduct of these character traits and combined with the characters themselves it works. The content creators have mistakenly credited the fatness as the whole picture, but honestly watching old John Candy movies that guy is fantastic and everyone loves him and nobody cares hes fat. Its a combination of attitudes and fatness that we see here but instead of recognising it as an acceptable literary allusion they just call it fat shaming, which is somewhat lazier than the original material.
Fun fact: In the scene in Chamber Of Secrets where Ron barfs up slugs, Rupert Grint had fake slugs in his mouth but the slime was actually candy in Grint’s favourite flavours!
Well, that worked! Pretty funny! XD
As a Hufflepuff, I may not be hardworking at times but I am extremely loyal to my friends and family.
When I think back, I realise how Nazi Germany the whole thing was:
The snatchers essentially represented the gestapo
The purity of wizard blood and the hatred of non pure bloods related to Germany.
The hunting of muggle borns etc was the hunting of Jews
The forced enrollment into Hogwarts by deathly hallows reminded me off the forced enrollment into the Hitler Youth
This was the second wizarding war (representing ww2)
Fudge being in denial about voldermort's return. This represents Neville chamberlain's attempts to convince Hitler not to attack Poland in 1938 (Munich agreement)
The failure for Fudge to do anything- chamberlain's approach to dealing with Hitler was limited and did not stop Poland's invasion.
Killing of lupin and Tonks leaving Teddy behind shows how war tears families apart and leaves orphans.
IF ANYONE THINKS OF ANYMORE, I'D LOVE TO HEAR THEM
Maybe it´s just because I´m German but these comparisons were clear to me even as a child.
@@maja-kehn9130 I was just a really ignorant child I guess
The most disturbing thing about Myrtle was the actress who played her was in her 40's.
Wow! I had to look that one up. I had no idea!
I knew that one already. 🤣
She was actually 37 is chamber of secrets
@@victoriaR587 And 40 in Goblet of Fire
@@victoriaR587 Daniel Radcliffe was 16 or 17.
Let's not forget that Dumbledore let Harry participate in the Goblet of Fire, even though it was clearly against the rules. And then there was the time that he sent a bunch of kids to a dark forest instead of detention. Honestly, if it didn't seem like child endangerment was the status quo for wizarding society, Dumbledore would have been in a lot of trouble. 😄
And let Harry stay with Dursleys even THOUGH he KNEW they were neglecting him!! 😣
Don't forget when the Basilisk was attacking students three 12-year-olds did more to stop it than all the adults combined.
Dumbledore was forced to let Harry compete in the tournament because all the champions were bound by a magical contract. What we don’t know is what would happen if said contract was broken. We know what would happen if the Unbreakable Vow was broken, but not the Triwizard champion contract.
@@stephenking5852 I don't think the consequences of breaking a Triwizard contract are as serious as breaking an Unbreakable Vow.
@@AHufflepuffAndASwiftie you clearly didn’t pay attention to the details, because it’s made pretty clear in the 5th book why Harry was with the Dursleys
Everybody except for Ron had a sad backstory in this franchise and paid the price for it immediately after.😢
What were Hermione and Ginny's sad back story ?? 🙄
Umm Hermione didn’t, the Weasley’s (despite being poor) didn’t, Seamus and Dean didn’t, Lavender Brown didn’t, the Patil twins didn’t, Cedric Diggory didn’t and that’s just the top of my head. Why pick on Ron, just cause he got a bit jealous of Harry at times doesn’t make him unworthy.
@@keirarees3179 thank you ........just seems like people never miss an opportunity to throw shade at Ron, the video isn't even about him.😒
i think you mean not tragic because being overlooked to the point that his mother doesnt even know he hates corned beef, being traumatized by his elder brothers, everything he owns being hand-me-downs, his bestfriend being the famous harry potter, those all seem sad enough to me, no tragic but sad
@@amandafelix-amadi5334 so true, just because they took a few lines of his from the books, now they treat his character like crap
I believe the scene with Dudly is worse than described, wasn't Hagrid trying to turn him into a pig, and it didn't work properly because Hagrid was using his broken wand?
Yup. Dudley was the result of his parents spoiling him rotten and letting him get away with everything. It wasn't really his fault, since he didn't know any better.
I know Snape himself can be a controversial character, but I feel one thing not brought up enough is how the Marauders actually tortured him... and got away with it. Sirius actively tried to murder him, and Dumbledore did nothing about it except swear Snape to secrecy about Remus. The pensive scene is also horrific, and yes, of course, Snape shouldn't have called Lily a mudblood, I don't think that excuses the marauders either. Still, until they think Sirius was a traitor, he was still considered a golden boy. Both Minerva and Albus are all praise for James. Also, James's continued harassment of Lily for seven years until she says yes is seen as a great live story, harassmentthat included actual harm to her best friend, whom he deemed a 'competitor'.
Looks like narrator doesn't read books 80% questions answer are there in books .
Professor moody was locked up in a chest compartment, he wasn’t a death eater in disguise 🤣
Rewatching Harry Potter now, you realize there are various problematic plot holes, the Wizarding World is alarmingly authoritarian, Dumbledore is frankly a villain, and child endangerment is normalized.
The Wizarding world is basically fascist. Government control information, there is no democracy at the ministry, and the leader is chosen internally by a select few. Moreover, the ministry is openly accepting bribes and it is treated as normal.
Additionally, the wizarding world is a meritocracy. As in, your accomplishments determine your status. Being talented and well read is supposed to be good things. Yet, Hermione is treated like crap for being studious and dedicated to learning. Basically a genius. In a society based on meritocracy, she would have a very high status because of that alone.
But that's not how she is portrayed.
@@Ikajo not to mention they have potions that make people tell the truth, telepaths, and magic objects that let u relive other people's memories, but its common for innocent people to get a cruel and unusual punishment in their justice system
@@maxxymrice6200 Indeed. I'm a writer myself, so I have a different insight into the process of creating a story. Creating a flawed society is not an issue, but in Harry Potter, the society is treated as separate from the people within.
Voldemort only represented a wider issue, he had followers because they agreed with him. Rowling is still presenting the wizarding world as good, even though nothing changes about the fundamental issues.
In some ways, it could have been more interesting to read about a character that started out within the system. First, that's all they know so they don't question it. As time passes, their worldview shifts as they are exposed to more ideas. Making them want to change how things work for the better. Setting them up against the establishment.
Instead we got a golden boy character with no real flaws and no real personality who in the end defended status quo, took down the boogie man, and did nothing to actually change people's minds.
And why is Voldemort half the villain he is?
Let’s be honest no matter how you look at it Harry Potter‘s “family” is just horrible
Exactly 😂
Omg, the Dumbledore point! Like yes, yes, YES! He is so manitulative and endangers the children constantly🤷🏼♀️😅
Why is it so hard for people to understand that the time Turner doesn't alter time it just sends you to a different point in time. In the Prisoner of Azkaban movie you can clearly see that the events that happened still happen.
Time travel has limitations and dire consequences, which is why it is highly regulated and guarded, also they destroyed every time turner in the fifth book by accident when fighting the Death Eaters.
@@maxxymrice6200 yet another reason why Cursed Child is terrible, since time turners were a major plot point there
Perhaps because that's not how it's shown to work in the film. It also makes zero sense why Hermoine was given one in the first place. The way the movies portray time travel suggests that in their universe, time travel is on a semi-closed loop. So instead of it being that you can't change the past by time traveling (i.e. going back in time to prevent Harry's parents from getting killed would then prevent you from having a reason to go back in time, meaning his parents would be killed), its more that you create the present you experienced already by time traveling- except Hermoine using the time turner to take extra classes contradicts that, which is a problem of poor writing. Even the phrase "Terrible things happen to wizards who mess with time" makes it clear that, at least to some degree, you can affect the past by time traveling.
@@Ori_Kohav I just reread the Harry Potter books, Hermione said the time turners were destroyed or something like that
@@divinelangene6813 EXACTLY!!! That’s the main reason bringing them back was a bad idea
Hulpuff stoner, have you lost your mind their known for their loyalty and compassion. Also their comman was near the kichen because Helga invented alot and I mean alot of food charms so that makes sense she would want her comman room there. I'm a raveclaw myshelf shout out to my sister house.
And Buckbeak!! They also save Buckbeak!! AND the thing with the time-turners is, that Hermione EXPLAINS in the book AND movie (I think), I might add, is that time-turners are EXTREMELY dangerous to use & awful things can happen to those "who mess with time"; that's why they're not used more often. Plus, J.K. purposefully DESTROYED ALL the time-turners in the 7th book just for THIS VERY reason. Of course, then the Cursed Child came along and messed all that up, but most Potterheads (including me) don't really count that as cannon, anyway, so. . . AND Mad-Eye Moody was NOT a Death-Eater; that was Brady Couch Jr. DISGUISED as Moody!! Jeez, DO YOUR RESEARCH!! AND I'm also really tired of all the Hufflepuffs being labeled as "stoners"!! That is NOT who we are; we are KIND, LOYAL, FRIENDLY, PATIENT, HARD-WORKING, & FAIR!! We are NOT lazy & a bunch of "stoners"!!! JEEZ!!! Read the darn books!! Or watch Fantastic Beasts & look @ Newt!! He is NOT a "stoner"!!! AND Book Hermione wasn't "perfect", either!! Nobody is!! That's kinda a point in the story, too!! 😡😡😡
The Cursed Child felt like cheap fanfiction.
If you are going to write a story about time travel, don't make it into a problem like J.K. Rowling did.😒⏳
I'm going to label The Cursed Child as a story from an alternate universe
I love your rant! That is spot on! :)
But didn't the Time Turners get destroyed in the 5th book and not the 7th? Lol
@@andreasmeelie1889 Oh yeah, you’re right. Oops 🙊! 😅
This last point is interesting bc house elves are less pronounced in the movies.
For those who did not read the books the Hogwarts kitchen is run by a mass of house elf slaves. So all the food for all the students and staff for each meal is prepared and served by these elves.
In the movies, you only see Dobby and Kreacher briefly. Also Hermione's opinion against their treatment is never brought up.
I might be wrong on this last point, but if I remember right, I think Dumbledore is the master of the Elves that work in the kitchen.
I still stand by Hagrid and the pig’s tail though.
Lockhart enjoyed and encouraged women and girls to crush on him, imagine what could have happened if one of his students got her hands on a love potion and dosed him with it.
In regards to Quirrel, he was the Muggle Studies professor for quite some time before he became the DADA professor.
Don't forget...the actress playing Moaning Myrtle was nearly FORTY, and Radcliffe was 16 at the time, which doubles the creepy factor.
Didn’t herminie literally curse a student? Something about the room of requirement and betraying “dumbledore’s army”?
In the book I’m not sure about the movie. She also does in the 6th book so Ron can make the Quidditch team.
That student deserved it, for siding with a clearly corrupted ministry, and with an abusive teacher who clearly can’t teach.
@@Ori_Kohav I’m not denying the student deserved it for ratting the group out. But I don’t think that the students knew that that would happen for betraying the group, however..
Yes. Marietta Edgecombe in the fifth book. Later, Cormac McLaggen in the sixth book to make sure Ron got the keeper position.
@@ChibiProwl actually, I think it was more for the team, because McLaggen was clearly NOT a team player
Seriously? There's an entry about Hufflepuff being stoners, but not one about the fact that Hermione kidnapped, false-imprisoned, and blackmailed someone? Or the fact that she disfigured Marietta for life? No? We're gonna leave it at "she is perfect"? Ok, then...
I haven't read the books in ages. Who did Hermione kidnap?
Marietta brought it on herself. She sided with an abusive teacher, and a corrupted minister who interfered with the school. That’s why the DA was formed in the first place.
@@charleysonnydickinsonvuori7833 Rita Skeeter, Hermione kept her in a jar with nothing but some twigs and leaves for about a week. I know Rita wasn't a great person, but that's insane.
The older i get the more I realize how extreme Hermione could be
i completely disagree with the points about dumbledore. he could not have told harry all this information because voldemort is excetionally good at legilemency therefor telling harry all this information is a giant risk and who would tell a 11 year old "hey kid there is a part of the soul of the dude who killed your parents inside of you and you have to die to get rid of it and save the wizarding world" dumbledore did not know harry was a horcrux until he got the gaunt ring (6th book) by then dumbledore also knew about voldemort returning using harrys blood and therefor keeping lilys protection up. so the dumbledores only fault was not telling harry he was horcrux in half blood prince but at this point he knew harry sucked at occlumency so telling him everything would just be information for voldemort + harry needed to conviced he would die so he could cast the sacrifical protection on all others during the batlle of hogwarts
in conclusion dumbledore did everything right
3:49 Hagrid gave Dudley that pig’s tail because he was greedy - being fat isn’t the ONLY reason one can be called a pig 🐷
The bigger problem with the Time Turners is they go out if their way to make a excuse for why there not more often used talking about how dangerous they are, but then they still gave one to a student so she could take extra classes.
I feel like it's because Hermione uses it for smart reasons.
I just keep wondering why they never used it to stop Voldemort from being born
@@femkebrassinne5147 the time turners could only go back for a few hours max, and you'll have to live the time you spend in the past, you can't magically go back, so that's the reason😊
What I don’t get: in GOFire, in the movie and book, at Karkaroff’s trial, he names Snape as a Death Eater, but Dumbledore announces that Snape was one but is now on their side as a spy..in a room full of people, a nosy reporter, and someone going back to prison where his & Snape’s buddies are-and nobody rats him out? Karkaroff doesn’t tell the other Death Eaters in prison or when he got out?
I never understood why death eaters mostly appear in one film, and also in GOF it's Barty jr that tortures Neville's parents but then in the next one, it's Bellatrix
Idk if this is a movie only thing, but it really undermined the twist at the end of GOF
That’s because Voldemort believed Snape was being a double agent spy at Hogwarts. The death eaters believed that too.
You’re forgetting Snape was believed as a double agent in the books and we didn’t know his true alliance till DH.
There are better ADULT questions to ask: HOW is it possible that NO muggle employee at King’s Cross has ever questioned why a bunch of school age children show up EVERY September 1st with VERY strange animals (ex. owls 🦉, rats 🐀, toads 🐸)? And how is teen pregnancy just not a thing at Hogwarts? You got a bunch of hormonal teenagers all sneaking out at night & seemingly no ADULT supervision in the Common Rooms at night, too … Okay, yes, you got Head Boys & Girls, BUT they’re still hormonal teenagers, too, don’t forget … Is there just a form of magical birth control that stops ALL pregnancies from even happening at all?? … If so, I want it! 😅 Also, why doesn’t Molly Weasley have a job?? I get why she didn’t when her kids were all little & she had no one to look after them , but they all grown or at school now … and she’s clearly a gifted witch … Another person working COULD help with the money problem … 😊 Maybe she just doesn’t want a job, which is more than fine with me; I’m not judging her (or anyone) for not wanting to work, but still, it always just seemed a little odd to me for her NOT to be working … Plenty women work in the Wizarding World and I mean, it’s not like she needed any further education TO work in the Wizarding World, unless she wanted to be an Auror (which also seemed a little bit odd to me, thinking about it now 😅) … 🤔 Oh, and: How is Newt still able to keep his wand & keep practicing magic 🪄 when he was expelled while Hagrid (who was also expelled, btw) wasn’t even allowed to keep his wand and had it COMPLETELY destroyed??
I don't remember that. 🤔Was Newt expelled? 🤔Where'd you read or hear that out of curiosity?🤔
@@ChibiProwl Yeah he was … it was mentioned in the 1st Fantastic Beasts movie 🎥 but, unfortunately, we never really got a real answer as to WHY EXACTLY he was expelled & will probably never know now … 😢 All we know is that it involved a magical creature somehow, so perhaps something similar to what happened to Hagrid … 🤔
There's a fan theory that Dumbledore brought in Lockheart to show Harry what giving into fame and admiration can do to a person. Regardless of whether you believe that theory or not, it's hard to assume that Dumbledore himself didn't know he was a fraud. There's a similar theory for why he brought in Lupin.
He even says "impaled upon your own sword gilderoy." When he finds him with no memory.
The only thing inappropriate about Myrtle is the actress' age. The character herself was Harry's age when she died, so, in the book, none of it was inappropriate age-wise.
You forgot the HUGE plot hole of the goblet of fire. It was getting Harry to win the tournament so he can touch the trophy which is a port key.
"Harry, hand me that book over there."
There are many plotholes in the books. The biggest being the reason Harry has to stay at Private Drive. According to the books, the spell only works if Harry consider the place his home. He doesn't. So the spell shouldn't work.
Then you have all the stuff that is treated as canon even though it was never in the book. Not in the book. Not canon.
@@Ikajo Like the Burrow scene in Half-Blood Prince.
@@grahamdamberger7130 Are you talking book or movie?
@@Ikajo Movie. The scene where Bellatrix and Fenrir burn the Burrow was never in the book.
Top 10 Things Only Adults Notice in My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic!
To be fair when it comes to the pig tail i always felt that was more because he just starts eating a cake made for his cousin with his bare hands. At the age of 11. Within about 5 mins of hagrid being there.
Altering time is extremely dangerous and unpredictable? Oh, let's give the ability to a 13 year-old just so she can take a couple extra classes. Seems fine.
And when heromine stands up ⬆️ to Lavender lol ❤😂😅😅!
My favorite 🤩 stoner jokes at the beginning lol 😂!0:00-5:55!
Goof at 06:55: "HARRY! DID YA PUT YA NAM IN DA GOBLA DEH FIYA?" You forgot to highlight how Dumbledore was incredibly out of character in the Goblet of Fire for the most part.
"Hermione is perfect" 😆😂😂😂😂😂...
Ya'll really need to read the books properly before you make these videos.
The house elves LIKED being enslaved. All Hermione ever succeeded in doing was insulting them and trying to force them into freedom that they DID NOT WANT.
Is it really slavery if it's your choice?? Hermione was trying to take their choices away because she believed it was right. She believed that her way was the right way, the only way for them to live and she tried to force them into it. How was she any better than the slave masters??
Don't get me wrong, I love Hermy. But she could have gone about it differently. I mean House elves definitely deserved to be treated with more kindness but she should not have disrespected them by spitting in the face of their traditions. It was their way of life, it was what they loved doing with their lives. Taking care of wizards was an honour to them.
It is okay, welcomed even, to fight for their better treatment and working conditions but not okay to take away their choice by forcing or tricking them into freedom. Yes, she actually tried to trick them by making wolly hats and hiding them around the common room for the house elves to accidentally pick up. Ron actually had to take to bringing out the hats form where she had buried them and said that the house elves should at least have a choice in the matter.
One other thing that shocks me, other than for plot, there is no reason the Weasleys, despite being poor, should be allowed a pet rat at school. The school notices with supply lists state clearly a cat, owl or toad ONLY. Yet, first Percy and then Ron get in no trouble whatsoever for bringing a rat. It seems that school rules are arbitrary.
icon
9:26 Excuse me, PERFECT?! 🤦♀️
Hermione may have had the right idea about improving the lives of House elves but she went about it in ALL the wrong ways! She expected all the Hogwarts House elves to just change their tune overnight about their servitude when they’d been indoctrinated into it for CENTURIES & were actually happy where they were (even though they should’ve thought more for themselves like Dobby - who was considered abnormal among elf kind) she knitted hats to FORCE them to leave servitude, leading them to feel so uncomfortable only Dobby was willing to clean the Gryffindor common room, meaning Hermione’s actions left him with FAR more work to do.
And for someone who struggles with the stigma of being muggle born, Hermione certainly isn’t afraid to put others down whom she sees as beneath her like Professor Trelawney simply because she sucked at Divination or Luna Lovegood because she was unique & had a different way of thinking.
She also tends to think she knows best, given how she went behind Harry’s back when she told Professor McGonagall about his mystery Firebolt broom - yes she feared for his safety but it was Harry’s choice in how to deal with something that was HIS, even if it was potentially dangerous (which it turned out not to be). As well as dismissing when Harry (or others) hears or sees something she can’t.
Granted, she’s not as bad in the films with these flaws but her having them is kind of the point - she is also brilliant, brave & reliable in a pinch but like all great characters, no one’s perfect.
Although I’m not sure how much I’d like Hermione as a person if her annoying features presented as often as her good points 🤷♀️
I really appreciate your comment. You're a legend. Thanks to say this, at least they're some people who've payed attention
Btw you dropped this 👑❤
Voldemort had cursed the defense against the dark arts position so that no one could stay in the position for more than one year. This is why Dumbledore gave the positions to them. It's also why Dumbledore never let Snape have the position until he knew his end was approaching.
I just noticed.. In Prisoner, at The Leaky Cauldron. The wizard stirring his tea with magic. He's reading A Brief History of Time...
5:00 Dear MsMojo,
I really love your Harry Potter content, but the thing you said about time turners is not quite right.
You see, the time turners in Harry Potter can only go back a few hours max, so they can't solve all problems.
Also, the sort of time turner is one with a closed time loop, so without paradoxes. This means that everything that happens with the time turner is what happens because the time turner was there all along. So saving Harry's parents or solving any other problems would be impossible due to these reasons...
And even if you could go back in time for more that 6 decades to kill Voldemort, you would have to stay that amount of time in that world. Just look at the Prisoner of Azkaban, Hermione spends here time in 2 classed at once, so technically, she would have aged at least 8 months or so. Keeping that in mind, if someone could go back and killed Voldemort, he would have aged arount 60 years.
Lastly, in the Order of the Phoenix book, when they get into the Ministry of Magic, they see that all the time turners are broken and gone. J. K. Rowling did this on purpose because she realized that the time travel plot would be to complicated.
This is not a hate comment, this is just some explanation on why this statement is false using the books and the internet.
You're making me feel old.
I was a Senior in high school when the first book came out 🤣🤣
the first book was published exactly a month before I was born in 97.
@@charleysonnydickinsonvuori7833 dee, that's why it makes me feel old 🤣
@@BigJeremyBeyer don't worry my dad was 52 when I was born. it's now 25 years later.
I hate the Time Turner arguments! Are people who read the books forgetting how difficult it’s supposed to be to get one and that the Ministry of Magic owned all of them? Why are people acting like wizards could buy them at a store? I’ve never understood this argument.
If Dumbledore told Harry everything, Voldemort would have access to the same knowledge due to their connection. And Voldemort is absolutely experienced enough to leverage that.
And they’re right about the fat shaming..’Large Marge’ and in the books she writes about Portly Duddly or about his big bottom, or about his size many times..also with the Time Turners, I think there’s a time limit of how far back you can go-in the remake of The Time Machine..he built the machine to go back to save his girl but if she hadn’t died, he wouldn’t had built the machine -so to use the machine, she had to die..same thing with the Turners I think-might gave put a time limit so you don’t loop
Can we just discuss Sirius Black for a minute? When arrested for the supposed murder of Peter Pettigrew, he was sent straight to Azkaban without trial, Veritaserum, or any chance to defend himself. Dumbledore knew the truth about Peter as the secret keeper for the Potters yet did not speak up about it, leaving everyone thinking Black had betrayed them to Voldemort. He condemned Black to more then a decade in prison for something he could prove he didn’t do.
Then when Sirius provides his house to help the Order, Dumbledore confines him to it. One prison for another. At a time when he could help the most, Dumbledore put him in a position he could help the least. What a way to say thank you.
And locking the deadly perils that protected the Philosophers Stone behind a door you could unlock with a spell from a first years’ spell book, then telling kids “don’t go there”. Brilliant thinking if ever I heard it.
Salazar Slytherin was a parcel tongue, everyone knows. He hid a mysterious chamber in the school, everyone knows. “The castle has been searched several times” we are told. Sherlock Holmes, they ain’t.
I don't think Hufflepuffs are secretly stoners at all. Dumbledore definitely had some favoritism. Harry and his friends definitely got away with a lot more.
Love potions dark joke lol ❤😂😅😅!
Come on, just let a really good series be a really good series.
Hufflepuffs are just kind nice people not stoners!!!! Sheeesh!!!!
Isn’t Cedric enough proof of that? Not to mention Tonks and Sprout
It's no wonder Voldemort can't love, considering he was conceived via a Love Potion. Merope literally drugs him in order to have him. Yes, her life was terrible, but that's no excuse to trap your partner when they clearly don't love you. It is interesting she was able to brew such a complicated potion when she was not the best at magic, she definitely put a lot of effort into mastering it.
And that seems like the kind of thing that would automatically lead to an unhealthy upbringing, being raised by parents who had an entire relationship without consent or love.
@@as3957 Exactly. What made it worse is that his father abandoned them before he was even born and his mother died giving birth to him so he was raised in an orphanage without familial love
That's not actually canon. Not in the books, not canon.
You know the real villain of the Harry Potter world is the adults who are committed to giving super powerful magical items and teaching super dangerous spells to children and then act surprised when fuckery happens as if they had nothing to do with it. Why was Hermoine given a time turner? Harry the invisibility cloak? The Weasley brothers that map? Why did we teach Voldemort about horcruxes? A room full of teenagers how to make magical roofies? The unforgiveable curses? Why was Draco tasked with killing the most powerful wizard outside of Voldemort? Hmm??? Dolores was a monster but she was right about one thing; they need some serious oversight in the wizarding world cause ya'll out of pocket. Ironic given that she's top 10 on that list lol
Fred and George weren't given the map they stole it in their first year from the caretakers office
The thing about House Elves being slaves is they like it this way. As long as they aren't being abused, they're very happy with their lives serving their masters. It's been a while since I read the books, but I think I remember a mention of Dumbledore trying to introduce them to being paid and they rejected it. Dobby was happy with his freedom because he was being abused by the Malfoy's several times a day, every day. When Winky was freed, she would get drunk and cry all day because she wanted to go back and serve her masters. Hermione trying to free the elves through SPEW annoyed them and was insulting to them. House Elves are slaves, because that is precisely what THEY want to be
1. Quirrell was the muggle professor first, and did not have Voldemort on the back of his head when he was fired. Lockhard was the only one who applied for the job. No one got hurt when Lupin was a student which was for 7 years, so why would he hurt someone when he became a professor? Dumbledore had known Moody for years, and Moody was resposible for filling up half of Azkaban, and he never took drinks from others to protect him from poison, so why would Dumbledore double check on Moody? and noone applied for the DADA in Harry's 5'th year, so the ministry decided to give it to Umbridge to keep the students in line..
2. Dumbledore didn't suck, he just did what he could to finally defeat Voldemort.
3. The houseelfs didn't want to be freed, it was only Dobby. The others saw it as an honor to work, so it's more confusing than saying noone supported freeing houseelfs, they just knew houseelfs wouldn't want that.
Harry was a means to an end of finally ridding the world of Voldemort. Dumbledore knew this.
A lot of these I myself noticed as a kid such as the fact that they keep on calling Hogwarts the safest school and yet all of that danger happens. Lol
The teacher background checks I always questioned since I was a kid too. Lol
However I feel like most of this video is kind of too harsh.
Dumbledore wasn't always purposely perfect but he had to let Harry be ready to sacrifice himself as the Horcrux which is why he didn't tell him or anything or else Harry wouldn't be brave enough.
Also, even as a kid I always caught onto the fact that having your souls sucked by the dementors by the Dementor's Kiss was something I never really wanted.
As for the number one pick, the other characters did care that the elves were slaves and Hermione even got Harry to be nice to Kreacher in the 7th book making Kreacher come around.
Just sometimes the elves just loved working and Hermione at times took things way too far.
I don't remember how old I was but I was nine when I learned that love potions isn't right due to controlling someone to fall in love with you instead of doing that naturally.
It even sounds way too judgmental to accuse the Hufflepuffs as stoners. People who honestly come up with that are thinking way too much, no offense.
The "slavery question" was covered rather extensively in the novels but seemed glossed over in the films (And frankly? In Chamber of Secrets, I found "Dobby" irritating or annoying. Sort of.... the Jar Jar Binks of the Harry Potter universe. My attitude softened later). I can't help but wonder if someone didn't encourage Rowling to tone this down for the films, as the issue might not play well with American audiences.
I never realised how messed up these aspects of Harry Potter were until now
I’m sorry, but most of those entries are easily countered by just paying attention to details. Do your research next time, okay?
I don’t think you need spoiler alerts for such old films lollll
I don't know how background checks would help. Lockhart fooled everybody, whole wizard world, about his deeds. Moody was replace by death eater like day before school started long after any background check would be made. Quirell was teaching in Hogwart for at least few years before he sprouted Voldemort on his head, long after they would do background check on him. Question with Moody and Quirell is why, despite Dumbledore being so smart and powerful, it took like year to figure out what's wrong with them.
Even if they had done a background check, they would have run it on Madeye Moody and except for his occasional paranoia, he would have been deemed teacher material, as he, if I remember it correctly, taught before being offered the position as a Hogwarts teacher, since he taught the young Aurors in training. At least that is how I remember it. I could be wrong though...
The love potion is such a dark joke lol I ❤😅😅😎😊😍
I’m 11 years old and watching this. This is really interesting 😮
And can we also please mention the corruption, the inconsistency and the hypocrisy of the ministery of magic? The ministeries lack of self-critisism, selfreflection and selfimprovement. And their complete lack of logic and above all, lack of fairness. And worst of all, enforcing their way of thinking, working and behaving to everyone within the wizarding world and sometimes even onto the muggle world?
I don’t agree with the Hufflepuff one at all :/
Not kinda- Dumbledore the worst
In #3, he didn't simply asked Harry if he put his name in the Goblet of Fire calmly...🤨
Horribly out of character from the Dumbledore in the books. Such a shame Richard Harris passed away. He was so well cast as Dumbledore.
Honestly can't remember if I thought about it as a kid but, "they were starving him mum, there were bars on his windows!", totally brushed off. Letters sent to the cupboard under the stairs. No one asked or cared why Harry hated the dursleys, they, adults in general, had a good idea what was going on there but "Dumbledore knows best" Every adult on the light side acted against their conscience regarding harry or anything really when it came to Dumbledore, even if they told him they didn't agree, Dumbledore gives some claptrap and "oh well then" Just a little of the messed up stuff, it drives me bonkers.
But I said I’m not watching Harry Potter, but I’ll just keep watching it and coming on this video!
Not really! I’m just lying!
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
But the house elves wanted to work. 😅 I think freeing them all would have been a bad idea. The wizards knew this and Ron showed kindness to them along with Harry in the books
The worst thing about the Moaning Myrtle storyline in movie form was that the woman who played Myrtle was so much older than the rest of the cast. That bathroom scene hits hard when you consider that the kids were cast in age-appropriate roles and there's a 30 year old woman in the tub with Daniel.
It isn't just adults that notice Dumbledore kinda socks. Plenty if kids and teens are also aware of this.
I never liked Harry Potter, the books were so boring I couldn’t get through the first page of the first book. Funny enough I found the time turner on the playground as a kid and never knew what it was, one girl harassed me for weeks to give it to her. Never did give it to her. The adult bits in the movies were pretty damn obvious, same as Palpatine being obvious about his “evilness”. Sad how bad movies suck.
They house elves should work but for pay and actual freaking living decency
I wish that that Harry Potter and Ginny were not shown in the movies as much as they were shown in the books
In the books it say the time turner can only go back a few hours, they are kept in the department of mystery and need permission to have them and also when in the 5th book they have the battle at the department of mysteries all the time turners are destroyed x x
does anyone remember in goblet when the carriage was rocking post yule ball 😂
3:24 - I've noticed that almost all the evil or dislikable characters in HP are either fat or ugly or both.
7:57 Damn. I like how Rebecca described Order of the Phoenix
Rebecca isn't narrating this video.
Ms. Mojo, Please tell me you don’t *actually* think Hermione is perfect… I could point out SEVERAL things about her that have not aged well…
Dumbledore does not sucks. Please
May I remind you all of that happened at Hogwarts, and half of the students that went there still, sent there KIDS there, like what.
Hufflepuff Gang where you at??
#BadgerUp