WE WHO WRESTLE WITH GOD | JORDAN PETERSON | BOOK REVIEW

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @erikhillreviews
    @erikhillreviews  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    To add a bit more to the review, I want to elaborate more on why I think this book is inspiring and why I rated it so highly. This book is effective at taking everyday choices and tying them to a higher plane of existence. If I choose to clean my room, that might be something insignificant on a global scale, but that impulse to choose order over chaos, self-improvement over apathy, is the same impulse that is at the heart of all the great stories of the bible. My existence, though it may seem small, is taking place on the ancient and cosmic stage of the battle between good vs. evil. My conclusion from reading this book is that we tend to be underestimating the end trajectory of our lives. We can live a life that is full of adventure, challenges, and ultimate fulfillment, and at the same time we are capable of being horrible monsters. In other words, if you think your life doesn’t matter, think again.

  • @paulking9479
    @paulking9479 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The deeper you go the more you see how beautifully crafted the tapestry is, unfortunately those without clear vision don't even see the door handle, thus becoming imprisoned from their attempts to paint anew.

    • @erikhillreviews
      @erikhillreviews  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've read this several times and it sounds like a three-line poem to me. I think I like where you're going with this, though as with most good poems, I'm also still trying to figure it out. What do you mean by the last bit about people being imprisoned from their attempts to paint anew?

    • @paulking9479
      @paulking9479 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @erikhillreviews The tapestry is all there is, there to guide,there to support,there to encourage.
      To paint anew is to continually use the brush without ceasing, in an effort to create that which is beyond creation.

  • @shantanutamrakar5621
    @shantanutamrakar5621 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Hilarious yet serious and insightful review. Loved it!

    • @erikhillreviews
      @erikhillreviews  21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thanks! Happy to help :)

  • @jonrendell
    @jonrendell 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    First we have to define 'wrestle', then 'god', then 'who' - after we define 'we', of course.

    • @erikhillreviews
      @erikhillreviews  29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      We should really start by defining what it means to define something

  • @yukihirasouma4691
    @yukihirasouma4691 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Are you interested in economics? I would like you to review Thomas Sowell books.

    • @erikhillreviews
      @erikhillreviews  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I, for one, am a huge fan of Thomas Sowell. I've been thinking about doing a few of his books on the channel, so thank you for the encouragement. I'm on it!

  • @zachzeurcher6450
    @zachzeurcher6450 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great unbiased review

    • @erikhillreviews
      @erikhillreviews  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! I try to keep things even-handed :)

  • @MikeFuller-d4d
    @MikeFuller-d4d 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for this insightful TH-cam video, Erik!
    I am a very poor reader but I have bought this book.
    I do admire intellectuals like Jordan Peterson but he could be talking pure gobbledygook for all I know! 3 great intellectuals alive now - Slavoj Zizek, Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris.

    • @erikhillreviews
      @erikhillreviews  18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thanks! Zizek is an interesting addition there. I've heard of him and seen little clips, but I'm not sure where he's at philosophically. Actually, I think the clips of Zizek that I've seen was when he talked to Jordan Peterson. What stands out about him to you?

    • @MikeFuller-d4d
      @MikeFuller-d4d 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@erikhillreviews
      I think he is quite deceptive, Erik. He says a lot without appearing to be saying much? His work on popular culture, psychoanalysis, theology, Hegelianism, Marxism, and political economy, mark his as one of the world's leading philosophers and a polymath. He seems to argue that Hegel still should have some influence on modern philosophical thinking but a lot of what he says goes over my head.
      Have a GREAT New Year, Erik!