Heidegger's Basic Phenomenology of Things - Intro to Being and Time

This is a basic introduction to help readers understand Heidegger's "Being and Time" or other related works. I explain a few of Heidegger's terms and how they are related as well as how Heidegger believed we interacted with and experience things-in-the-world.
Follow me
- Instagram - bradleygear...
- Twitter - / bradleygearhar7
- Medium Articles - / bradleygearhart
- Public Facebook Page - / bradleyegearhart
- BitChute - www.bitchute.com/channel/MIqG...
Consider joining my Patreon! - / bradleygearhart
Amazon Affiliate Link - Please use this link if you plan on making an Amazon purchase. I will get a small cut of your purchase and by doing so, you are helping me be able to make more videos :) - www.amazon.com/b?_encoding=UT...
#Heidegger #BeingAndTime #Phenomenology
TIMESTAMPS
Introduction / How do we Understand Things? - 0:00
Notes on "Being and Time", Ontology, & Phenomenology - 0:48
Being-in-the-world - 2:00
Dasein - 2:44
Concern / Care - 3:29
Equipment - 4:45
Readiness-to-hand - 5:31
What does this all mean? / Wrapping it all together - 7:11

[@misanek007]

In understanding Da-sein, it is important to distinguish with Dasein without the hyphen. The Dasein (without the hyphen) is a normal German word, that is used equivalently with existence in German. Da-sein (with a hyphen) is a uniquely Heideggerian word meaning being-there. I read the Czech translation of the work, where Da-sein is translated as dwelling, to dwell, this understanding of Da-sein is also talked about in the English speaking circles.

[@PartyComrade]

Good video

[@BradleyGearhart]

Thanks!

[@nataliekennedy4646]

Tooth brush moustaches were a strange thing back in the day

[@ekszentrik]

Good vid. I always found it very sus and crypto-dualist how material physics pretends human observers are somehow some disembodied entity from the outside universe. I don't refer to quantum weirdness which legitly has nothing to do with consciousness, more with its unwillingness to entertain an idea beside determinism. It's most parsimonious if mind and matter are one ontological substance.

[@Ahmed-qn5wj]

Why was this randomly recommended to me xdxd

[@BradleyGearhart]

Good question

[@Ahmed-qn5wj]

:) Your channel is very underrated

[@BradleyGearhart]

@@Ahmed-qn5wj thank you!

[@thomaslee8088]

There are ZERO good intros to Heideggers 'Sein und Seit' on youtube. Simply put, its a bunch of descriptive pieces of wordsalad. Subjects and defintions presented outside of their context, making Heidegger seen as someone just finding his own way in the philosophical world (academically speaking he is), but the point being that he was always answering another question that other philosophers before him didnt answer "properly" ...I suggest an intro on Heideggers 'Sein und Seit' should be a historical analysis on how the prime substance had been interpreted (the true, God, forms, etc.), and that Heidegger saw that the question was wrong, and the answer to this was 'Dasein'. Then focus on that and that only, wait with the 'Vorhandenheit'; if you dont understand how and what 'Dasein' is an answer to in the philosophical history, the rest is just wordsalad.